7 Amendments of Fredrick FEDERLEY related to 2015/2137(INI)
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the full implementation of the Nature Directives is essentialimportant for the strategy as a whole, and calls on all parties concerned to do their utmost to achieve this;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Urges the Commission and member states when implementing legislation and strategies to consider important factors such as regional differences, acceptance of regulations among local and regional actors as well as the public. It is also important in order to achieve the targets set out in the EU biodiversity efforts to work closely and in collaboration with individual land-owners as well as local and regional actors.
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes and regrets that there has not yet been a measurable improvement of the biodiversity status in agriculture; urges the Commission and Member States to monitor, assess and increase the effectiveness of greening measures and other rural development measures of the CAP; calls on the Commission to take into account its findings and especially considers possible new incentives for supporting environmental measures within the CAP, in the mid-term review of the CAP;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Notes that the greening of Pillar I of the CAP was designed to improve and ensure the conservation of biodiversity; underlines the potential of such measures; urges the Commission to evaluate the impact on biodiversity in light of the increased flexibility afforded by the greening measures;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Highlights the need to move from a means-based approach to a results-based approach;
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Is convinced that thone problem lies not with the legislation itself but primarily with itimary obstacle concerns incomplete and inadequate implementation; opposes a possibleconsidering this, opposes any revision of the Nnature Ddirectives because thiswhich would jeopardisze the implementation of the biodiversity strategy, bring about a protracted period of legal uncertainty and possibly weaken the legislation; whilst it is vital that regulations and implementation consider regional and local conditions as well as socio-economic factors;
Amendment 361 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Strongly believes that the environment and innovation complement one another, and draws particular attention to nature- based solutions which provide both economically and environmentally smart solutions to address challenges such as climate change, scarcity of raw materials and, pollution and antimicrobial resistance; calls on the Member States to take up these ‘calls’ under Horizon 2020;