Activities of Jytte GUTELAND related to 2015/2147(INI)
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (5)
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Supports the establishment during 2016 of an EU-wide dispute resolution platform for consumer protection; emphasises that consumer rights cannot be guaranteed without effective legislation and access to legal instruments; takes the view that e-commerce could also flourish if consumers are able to shop online with similar terms applying throughout Europe;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Shares the Commission’s view that the digital single market has major potential in terms of Europe’s growth and competitiveness, calls on the Commission to seize the opportunities presented by digitisation and takes the view that in this regard the Commission ought in particular to support and harness the potential that the green and social economy has for a sustainable European single market;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -3 a (new)
Paragraph -3 a (new)
-3a. Emphasises the need to overhaul and harmonise copyright law to ensure it is suited to a modern and increasingly digitalised society; points out that a harmonised framework must ensure that copyright holders are legally protected and receive adequate remuneration for their works, including within the digital single market; takes the view that a modern copyright law reform involves striking a balance between the interests of rights holders and users; welcomes the proposals in the harmonisation measures on the portability of legally acquired material and the ‘follow the money’ approach for those who infringe intellectual property rights on a commercial scale;
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -3 b (new)
Paragraph -3 b (new)
-3b. Supports the Commission’s view that there is a need for further analysis of certain areas before decisions on specific measures are taken, and thus calls on the Commission to carry out thoroughgoing evidence-based impact assessments before new proposals are brought forward;
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that internet service providers should bear greater responsibility for illegal content made available on Calls on the Commission to consider, in an evidence-based manner, whether a ‘duty of care’ should be introduced in order to ascertain whether internet and should, along with other actors in the supply chain such as payment providers, play a significant role in tackling copyright abusemediaries can be required to exercise greater responsibility in the way the manage their networks;