Activities of Max ANDERSSON related to 2016/2273(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the EU eGovernment action plan 2016-2020
Amendments (8)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU e-Justice Portal is an essential tool for access to information and to justice, and constitutes an important step in achieving the modernisation of EU public administration;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas better access to information and the increased use of improved digital tools for company-law- related formalities throughout the lifecycle of companies would reduceincrease transparency and legal certainty, while supporting Member States in the fight against tax evasion and reducing the administrative burden for companies, particularly where the relevant electronic public services are available across borders;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas single access to these registers through the e-Justice Portal is not yet possible because of differences in the technical standards used by Member States; considers that further efforts are needed to achieve accessible, interoperable and user-friendly eGovernment tools available to the public in the EU;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the use of open standards is fundamental in order to allow EU citizens to participate in governmental platforms, and in order not to force citizens to use vendor-specific programs in order to communicate with their government;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to consider further ways to promote digital solutions for formalities throughout a company’s lifecycle, in particular for online registration processes, the electronic filing of company documents and, the provision of information for business registers and the reporting of corporate income tax; notes that in this field legislation may be the only way to create an appropriate legal framework for EU- wide digital solutions, while ensuring that the public interest principles, such as tax liability, are complied with;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission to support Member States when putting in place automated centralised mechanisms which allow the identification, in a timely manner, of any natural or legal persons holding or controlling land and buildings within their territory, in order to prevent the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing; considers that this information should be directly accessible, at national level, to Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) and competent authorities, and should be accessible and searchable through the centralised mechanisms by the FIUs of other Member States;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member states to promote open standards when developing public digital solutions.