12 Amendments of Harald VILIMSKY related to 2018/2092(INI)
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considerwelcomes the proposal for splitting the abolition of checks at internal borders into two legal acts in order to set different timeframes for the abolition of checks at land, sea and air borders a significant departure from the text of the draft Council decision of 29 September 2010 approved by Parliamentsince the security situation has deteriorated in recent years;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Expresses concern that the introduction of a two-step approach could negatively impact the future enlargement of the Schengen area; emphasises that the failure to reach consensus in the Council calls into question the credibility of the EU and continuously erodes public support for common EU policies by demonstrating unequal treatment of Member States and introducing artificial lines of division within the Union; voices its concern that such practices contribute to the rise of populism and nationalism across the continent, which poses a fundamental challenge to the functioning of the EUan enlargement of the Schengen area could negatively impact the future;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the fact that the free movement of persons across internal borders is one of the main achieat the fundamental safety interests outweigh the principle of free movements of the EUpersons; stresses that the enlargement of the Schengen area should not bedoes negatively impacted by shortcomings in other EU policies, such as the Common European Asylum System other EU policies;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the adoption of the Council decision of 12 October 2017 granting Bulgaria and Romania passive access to the Visa Information System and the Council’s proposal for the full application of the remaining provisions of the Schengen acquis relating to the Schengen Information System in both Member States; regrets the fact that the adoption of these decisions did not immediately follow verification of the successful completion of the Schengen evaluation process in 2011, but was initiated as an ad-hoc measure to ensure compliance with the preconditions for the implementation of the Entry/Exit System, expected to be operational by 2020; considers that these legal acts constitute a step towards closing information gaps between those Member States applying the Schengen acquis in full and those applying it partially; firmly insists that the adoption of these acts should not serve to further delay the abolition of checks at internal land, sea and air borders; notes that with the adoption of these decisions, Bulgaria and Romania will share all the responsibilities and obligations, but not all the benefits, of fully fledged Schengen area membershipconsiders that these legal acts constitute a step towards closing information gaps between those Member States applying the Schengen acquis in full and those applying it partially;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that with regard to the full application of the Schengen acquis, no additional criteria should be introduced or links to other Union mechanisms and policies made, other than the specified prerequisites laid down in the 2005 Act of Accessionto address security concerns and other deficiencies regarding the management of external borders or links to other Union mechanisms and policies; calls on the Member States to takenot rush a decision on the enlargement of the Schengen area solely on the basis of the simple fulfilment of the relevant conditions for applying the Schengen acquis following the completion of the Schengen evaluation procesoutdated conditions;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11