6 Amendments of Angelika MLINAR related to 2014/2243(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas a series of important pre- conditions still need to be addressed and met in order to ensure that RPAS do not pose serious risks for citizens' fundamental rights to privacy and data protection, to security and to safety and that RPAS can be fully integrated into the European civil aviation system, as demonstrated by a series of accidents and incidents, which reveal that a series of technological advances and legal requirements still need to be developed, integrated and implemented across the whole RPAS chain to ensure that citizens are fully protected;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas only a clear and complete EU and Member States' regulatory framework, addressing the whole RPAS chain and guaranteeing safety, security, privacy and data protection, environmental protection, responsibility and liability, law enforcement action, insurance, identification and transparency, can guarantee the safe integration of RPAS into the civil aviation system;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that rules at EU and national level should clearly set and indicate the provisions applicable to RPAS in relation to the internal market and international commerce (production, sale, purchase, trade and use of RPAS), safety and security (pilot licences, flight authorisation, identification and monitoring of RPAS and of RPAS flights, including in no-fly zones, such as airports and other critical infrastructure, and rules that should be followed when operating a drone, such as those on visual contact), privacy and data protection and also any other applicable law, such as criminal, intellectual property, aviation, and environmental law, which should be specified in a notice for buyers;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Is concerned about the fact that currently law enforcement action against illegal, unsafe or irresponsible use of drones is extremely difficult if not impossible and invites law enforcement authorities to indicate possible ways to ensure that they can carry out their activities to defend citizens' rights, safety and security;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls the Commission to report in detail and in straightforward terms, for instance in its upcoming impact assessment, about which actions it plans to undertake in the "drones' chain" to ensure that the objectives of safety, security, respect of fundamental rights, namely privacy and data protection, environment, responsibility and liability, law enforcement action, insurance, identification and transparency, technological development, can be achieved, with recommendations for MS and/or EU action, and possible options.
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the Commission to present an overview and evaluation of the regulatory approaches at Member State level, so as to allow a comparison and to identify best practices, including past, present and future use of EU funds for civilian and military drones development;