30 Amendments of Olaf STUGER
Amendment 37 #
2018/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The programme shall be open only to:
Amendment 39 #
2018/0227(COD)
2. Acceding countries, candidate countries and potential candidates , in accordance with the general principles and general terms and conditions for their participation in Union programmes established in the respective framework agreements and Association Council Ddecisions, or similar agreements, and in accordance with the specific conditions laid down in agreements between the Union and them;
Amendment 40 #
2018/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
2a. Countries with a satisfactory score on the Transparency International Corruption Index.
Amendment 41 #
2018/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Amendment 42 #
2018/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Amendment 53 #
2018/0227(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) where applicable, the economic, social, climate and environmental impact, and accessibility;
Amendment 15 #
2018/0206(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The Committee on Regional Development calls for the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) to be rejected, and for the funds that are released as a result to be directly refunded to those Member States which are net contributors.
Amendment 580 #
2018/0199(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
A review mayust be organised by the Commission to examine the performance of Interreg programmes.
Amendment 82 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(ja) countries with an unsatisfactory score on the Transparency International Corruption Index.
Amendment 83 #
2018/0197(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. In addition, the Cohesion Fund shall not support investment in housing unless related to the promotion of energy efficiency or renewable energy use, including housing for non-western immigrants.
Amendment 5 #
2014/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas cohesion policy for 2014-2020 is the EU’s maian investment policy based on Member States contributions and aligned with the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, with a budget of EUR 350 billion until the end of 2020;
Amendment 21 #
2014/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas there is a growing need for stronger co-ownership of the strategy by the different levels of governance and for shared responsibility at all levels of project implementation; whereas multi-level governance should be enhancedto enhance the principle of solidarity at all levels of project implementation;
Amendment 29 #
2014/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the goals of cohesion policy have unquestionably evolved over the time, demonstrating their effectiveness; whereas the European Fund for Strategic Investments brings new elements to the overall EU strategy aimed at creating growth and jobsweak impact on economic development and the fight against social exclusion;
Amendment 75 #
2014/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 120 #
2014/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 175 #
2014/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that the review of the Europe 2020 strategy, which will probably precede the launch of the proposal for the mid-term review/revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2014-2020, will already give an indication of trends for future cohesion policy post-2020, as well as for other MFF instruments; stresses, in this context, the importance of effectively addressing all the concerns raised above, while ensuring the continuity of the strategic approach; recalls, also, the added value of an EU-wide cohesion policy, both in terms of growth and jobs objectives and with a view to ensuring balanced, harmonious development across the EU;
Amendment 6 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the macro-regional strategies represent a new model of multilevel governancemay secondarily represent a cooperation model in which the involvement of stakeholders representing the EU, national, regional and local levels and different policies and programmes is essential for success;
Amendment 19 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the EUSAIR is a new form of regional cooperation and platform for enlargement and an exercise in preparedness prior to EU accession;
Amendment 33 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 41 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 60 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 93 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises that the region faces serious migration problems in the Mediterranean; stresses that controlling these problemsmbating mass immigration is essential for the further development of the southern part of the region;
Amendment 212 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 236 #
2014/2214(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Underlines the crucial importance of tourism for the European economy, especially for the Mediterranean countries and for the region as a whole; urges more support for the financing of tourism projects from the ESIF and other sources;
Amendment 3 #
2014/2155(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with concern that 321 irregularities reported as fraudulent and 4 672 reported as non- fraudulent were cohesion-policy related; points out that in both categories the number of reports increased by 15 % as compared to 2012 while the related amounts decreased; observes that, as in previous years, the largest share of amounts that involved irregularities in 2013 (63 %) is nonetheless still related to cohesion policy;
Amendment 9 #
2014/2155(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that this statistical data still only gives an approximate indication of the impact of irregularities on the EU budget; believes that the inaccuracy stems from different approaches between and within Member States to the detection and classification of irregularities; takes the view, moreover, that it is highly inadvisable to accord financial aid to manifestly corrupt countries;
Amendment 20 #
2014/2155(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. AppreciateConsiders the efforts made by the Member States to detect, evaluate and/or report irregularities, including fraud, to be inadequate; calls on the Member States and their authorities to ensure stronger ex- ante coordination and evaluation;
Amendment 23 #
2014/2155(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Urges the Council and Commission to withhold financial assistance from countries with unsatisfactory scores on the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index;
Amendment 32 #
2014/2155(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – point b
Paragraph 4 – point b
(b) the Council to support the directive on the fight against fraud to the EU’s financial interests by means of criminal law and, in addition, to withhold further financial aid from countries manifestly guilty of fraud; and
Amendment 35 #
2014/2155(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – point c
Paragraph 4 – point c