7 Amendments of Annie SCHREIJER-PIERIK related to 2019/2160(INI)
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. To ensure better information on the marine litter landed in ports, i.e. get a better overview of the amounts of different kinds of waste and their recyclability, ports should be key collaborative partners responsible for the handling of waste and ensuring possible reuse of fishing gear.
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. A properly managed logistics around waste and end-of-use gear collection should be ensured to assist the fishers in their largely voluntary endeavours. This includes unified collection of the gear on board vessels in bags or containers, and provision of adequate facilities in the ports.
Amendment 179 #
11a. Pilot projects to explore reduction of materials, easier and faster disassembly and testing of gear functionality may be established to aid the (gradual) transition
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that the role of fishermen in voluntary collection programmes which make it possible to identify, collect and recycle marine waste, such as the ‘Fishing for Litter’ programme must be promoted and supported;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Fishing harbours should be discouraged to charge for disposal of litter brought to shore by fishers, as this would pose a counter-incentive to fishers.
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. There is a market for recycled material from fishing gear, which provides a potential to make the use of recyclable materials a legal requirement. Together with the EMFF provisions on the programming for support under shared management, this is an important incentive for the fishers and a way to see the value of their contribution to recycling.
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. International discussion on circularity should be encouraged featuring all stakeholders, including fishers, and especially, the rope and netting manufacturers from third countries.