BETA

Activities of Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY related to 2014/2233(INI)

Plenary speeches (2)

External impact of EU trade and investment policy on public-private initiatives (A8-0182/2015 - Jan Zahradil) ES
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2233(INI)
External impact of EU trade and investment policy on public-private initiatives (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2014/2233(INI)

Amendments (45)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to Article 208 TFEU, which establishes eradication of poverty as the primary objective of the EU development policy and the principle of policy coherent for development,
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 f (new)
2f. Notes that Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are high on the development agenda and they are increasingly being promoted as a way of closing the infrastructure financing gap in developed and developing countries alike;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 g (new)
2g. Stresses that the use of PPPs have been problematic due to a lack of contract transparency regarding PPPs, lack of assessing methodologies and lack of clear and transparent regulatory framework to prevent corruption;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that properly structured and efficiently implemented PPPs can bring many benefits such as innovation; outlines that PPPs in developing countries are so far concentrated mostly in the energy and telecommunications sectors, whereas private engagement in social infrastructure remains rare;deleted
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are high on the development agenda and they are increasingly being promoted as a way of closing the infrastructure financing gap in developed and developing countries alike;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the EU´s support and cooperation with the private sector can and must contribute to reducing poverty and inequality and promote human rights, environmental standards and social dialogue;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the global economic crisis has severely affected mature, emerging and developing countries since 2007 and has had an impact on budgetary policies and on the access of both institutional and private entities to the funds needed to carry out projects, affecting the development of infrastructure and other capital-intensive projects and the provision of basic services;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, owing to public budgetary constraints exacerbated by the economic and public debt crisis, it is important to improve the costs, effectiveness, efficiency and quality of public services and to ensure the timely delivery of public infrastructure, and whereas appropriate involvement of public and private actors can contribute to this;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas, in addition, there are new areas to be developed which have not been provided in the past by public services, together with newly designed financial instruments and a network of free trade agreements which provide, or pave the way, for further participation in investment projects abroad bringing together private companies and public entities;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 f (new)
3f. Stresses that the capacity of PPPs to deliver positive development outcomes cannot be assumed; PPPs should be promoted and designed in a way that delivers real results for the poor;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 g (new)
3g. Notes that PPPs must not be the way to transfer the risk from rich private companies taxpayers in poor countries;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 h (new)
3h. Notes that PPPs may be problematic as the financial risks are often disproportionately carried by the public sector, whereas profits are enjoyed by private investors;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 i (new)
3i. Stresses that PPPs should always comply with international agreed development principles such us the Development Effectiveness Principles and aligned with partner countries' national development and respect local knowledge and ownership are key ingredients of PPP models and implementation;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 j (new)
3j. Calls to consider PPPs only when other less expensive and risky financing options are not available;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for increased technical assistance to the governments of the partner countries;deleted
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas many emerging and developing countries face a mismatch between the dynamism of private businesses and the lack of reliable public infrastructure; whereas such gaps (which are striking in India or Brazil) have undermined potential growth, limiting export/import capacities or disturbing production lines owing to the absence of sufficient port infrastructure, deficiencies in internal transport (railways, freight or highways) or dysfunctional power generation units and power distribution grids; whereas they also have a negative impact on human welfare (owing to scarcity of sewage and water distribution networks); whereas PPPs allow integrated solutions whereby a partner or a consortium provides ‘building’ (construction, engineering and architecture services), ‘financing’ (injection of private funds, at least to pre- finance a project) and ‘exploitation’ (maintenance, surveillance and management services);deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas intergovernmental organisations have also used PPPs to devote aid to least-developed countries through partnerships operating in the field of development and cooperation: the World Bank, regional reconstruction banks, the Food and Agriculture Organisation, the World Health Organisation and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), to name but a few, have used PPPs to implement actions; whereas, as regards geographical focus, the USA, Australia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates and other Asian and Latin American countries (led by Chile) have experience of PPPs; whereas OECD countries (Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Ireland, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain) also have relevant legislation; whereas the UK has the most developed programme in respect of PPPs (with the Private Finance Initiative accounting for around 20 % of public investment); whereas the EU leads the PPP infrastructure market, concentrating more than 45 % of the nominal value of PPPs;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas PPPs have been used in the context of the Structural Funds, enlargement, the trans-European networks, Joint Technology Initiatives, Europe 2020, R&D (factories for the future, energy-efficient buildings, the green vehicles initiative, the sustainable process industry, photonics, robotics, high-performing computing, and 5G networks), e-learning, research projects with universities and other programmes in the health field (such as the innovative medicines initiative); whereas the European Investment Bank and the European PPP Expertise Centre have carried out projects in the EU, its neighbourhood and beyond; whereas the EU has also contributed through the Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund; whereas the European Fund for Strategic Investments intends to support a number of PPPs in the EU, in which companies from trading partners may participate;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas EU free trade agreements include provisions which pave the way for companies to bid in PPPs via market access and pre-establishment; whereas the treatment and possibilities open in respect of Korea, Colombia/Peru, Central America, Singapore and Canada (and Vietnam and Japan) are defined differently and specifically; whereas there has to be a relatively flexible approach as regards negotiations with different partners; whereas, at the multilateral level, the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) also establish a number of commitments, as may other plurilateral instruments such as the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA); whereas the environment in the EU is therefore becoming more competitive;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need to stimulate decent job creation, competitiveness and productivity through new endeavours designed to stimulate the activity of economic actors in order to re-launch growth; in a sustainable way;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that companies involved in PPPs respect corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate social accountability principles throughout the whole lifecycle of projects as PPPs cannot function effectively without an adequate regulatory framework;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls the EU to set up a regulatory framework that stimulates fair, responsible, transparent and accountable investment;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that SMEs and larger companies can provide unique private-sector know- how, experience, and networks involving public authorities in non-EU countries; considers that SMEs can achieve their potential if they perform at the global level and enter markets outside Europe, inter alia through PPPs, often by acting as subcontractors for larger EU companies;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Rejects the use public-private partnerships (PPPs) as a mechanism used to enforce developing countries to privatise state-run utilities and transfer the responsibility for improving public services into private hands;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it regrettable that while the EU has so far kept its government procurement markets largely open to international competition, many companies competing at EU level operate from protected countries, with such protection taking different forms such as state-owned enterprises, trade barriers in the field of government procurement, services or investment, preference for domestic bidders, restrictions on national treatment and market access, regulatory barriers to the establishment of branches or subsidiaries, and restrictions on access to financing;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that the use of PPPs has been problematic due to a lack of transparency regarding PPPs-contracts, lack of assessing methodologies and lack of a clear and transparent regulatory framework to prevent corruption;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stress the link between PPPs and the risk of debt unsustainability; Notes that PPPs must not be the way to transfer the risk from rich private companies taxpayers in poor countries;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Acknowledges that PPP-related challenges can be overcome through principles of good governance, such as transparency of rules, decisions and implementation, respect of countries sovereign policy space to take decisions in accordance to their populations’ demands, adequate planning, medium- and long-term cost-effectiveness, stakeholdercivil society organisations (CSOs) participation, reliability, accountability, fairness, efficiency and effectiveness, corruption deterrents, expertise of officials, debt risk assessments and appropriate overall risk assessment (from geopolitical contexts to interest rates) and allocation, and adequate investment protection;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that PPPs projects are opening up developing countries’ health sector to the private sector leading to the diversion of the scarce public funds from primary healthcare services instead of strengthening the universal public healthcare delivery systems with catastrophic consequences as it was again revealed during the struggle against the Ebola disease;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Stresses that PPPs should always comply with internationally agreed development principles such us the Development Effectiveness Principles, and should aligned with the partner countries’ national development and should respect local knowledge and ownership as key ingredients of PPP models and implementation;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Warns that the PPPs projects make it impossible to achieve the goal of food sovereignty as the PPPs harm small farmers by requiring developing countries to change their policies to facilitate the expansion of agribusiness and land grabbing in exchange of investment;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the delivery of high-quality, cost-effective public services to the public is essential in order to ensure successful implementation and viabilityfor reaching sustainable development; recalls that the complex choice of models and contracts has an impact on a project’s evolution; warns that at some stages PPPs have been used to exploit loopholes in fiscal accounting and reporting, which has led Eurostat to adopt targeted accounting rules; highlights the need for an adequate institutional framework combining political commitment, good governance and adequate underlying legislation;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the increasing potential of PPPs to foster innovative solutions mobilising long-term private finance and domestic resources for development objectives, given that massive investments are required in developing countries in terms of infrastructure, water supply and energy, the majority of which will need to come from the private sector; believes thatBelieves that that only if properly regulated PPPs canould also generate innovation in technologies and business models, and build mechanisms for holding the private sector accountable;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Notes that PPPs are high on the development agenda and they are increasingly being promoted as a way of closing the infrastructure financing gap in developed and developing countries alike;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses the need for the EU trade policy to respect developing country policy space for the maintenance of robust import tariffs that facilitate creation of skilled and decent jobs within local manufacturing and agro-processing industries as possible enablers of higher domestic value added, industrial growth and diversification which is a key component of economic and social upgrading; stresses that, opposite to the negative impacts of PPPs, which allow private partners to have their risk almost completely covered by governments by transferring the business risk to the public sector, the increase of the public-public partnership is a mechanism to rehabilitate or improve government-operated infrastructure enterprises;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Calls to consider PPPs only when other less expensive and risky financing options are not available
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Stress the capacity of PPPs to deliver positive development outcomes cannot be assumed; PPPs should be promoted and designed in a way that delivers real results for the poor;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on EU bodies to encourage EU companies participating in PPPs in third countries, in particular in least-developed countries, to work in accordance with the principle of policy coherence so that development cooperation objectives are taken into consideration; calls on the Commission, furthermore, to encourage sustainable investdevelopments and promote projects focused on poverty reduction, environmental protection, waste management or the use of renewable energies, for instance;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to work towards gaining substantial market access commitments internationally in the World Trade Organisation and in ongoing bilateral negotiations with third countries in order to redress the asymmetries in the level of openness of EU government procurement markets as compared with those of other trading partners;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to monitor EU businesses abroad and draw conclusions on success stories, models and good practices, with a view to drawing up guidelines, and to consider creating virtual documentation centres or observatories, to promote user-friendly platforms and networks for informing EU SMEs about opportunitievelop a legally binding framework ensuring accountability of the EU companies for their actions in developing countries in cases when they violate standards on human rights, gender equality, decent work, union rights, environmental protection, universal access to participate in PPPs abroad and to provide technical support as regards the legal framework and expected challengesquality public services, social protection, public and universal health coverage, universal access to medicines, and food and product safety; also calls on the Commission to promote the use of clear and comprehensive accounting rules at the international level so as to reduce the uncertainties associated with PPPs, while at the same time promoting sound budgetary policies and the sustainability of projects;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that companies involved in PPPs respect corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate social accountability principles throughout the whole lifecycle of projects as PPPs cannot function effectively without an adequate regulatory framework;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Given that in order to attract cross- border private-sector funds into PPPs, it is paramount to provide sufficient assurances that long-term investment will benefit from a clear, stable and secure environment, good governance and effective dispute settlement; calls on the Commission and the Council to collaborate to ensure that the necessary legal set-up in this area exists and is transparent, effective and cost- efficient (the new EU competence for investment allows synergies between investment and government procurement in a way that adds value in terms of market access and protection of acquired rights and assets);
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
PPPs outside the EU: new decent jobs and growth opportunities for EU companiesequitable and sustainable growth
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Is convinced that increased participation by EU companies in large- scale international PPPs would lead to substantial benefits in terms of decent job creation, productivity, competitiveness, technology and innovation development in Europe; recalls that the report ‘Internationalisation of European SMEs’ highlights the positive link between internationalisation and innovation in terms of product, service and processes;
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls the achievements in the EU through the use of PPPs in infrastructure development and vanguard fields of technology, research, e-learning and other high-added-value sectors, and encourages the Commission to identify those projects which have yielded the best results in the EU and to promote participation by EU companies in such ventures abroad;deleted
2015/04/20
Committee: INTA