BETA

6 Amendments of Jonás FERNÁNDEZ related to 2017/0136(COD)

Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) The degree of risk posed by a systemically-important CCP to the financial system and stability of the Union varies. The requirements for systemically- important CCPs should therefore be applied in a manner proportionate to the risks that the CCP may present to the Union. Where ESMA and the relevant central bank(s) of issue conclude that a third-country CCP is of such systemic importance that additional requirements will not ensure the financial stability of the Union, ESMA should be able to recommend to the Commission that that CCP should not be recognised. In its recommendation, ESMA should assess the net benefits of such a move with regards to safeguarding the interests of EU taxpayers and financial stability. The Commission should be able to adopt an implementing act declaring that the third- country CCP should be established in the Union and authorised as such to provide clearing services in the Union.
2018/04/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010
Article 44b – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) tasks, actions, and decisions for the supervision of systemically important CCPs established in the Union pursuant to Article 22g of Regulation (EU) 648/2012.
2018/04/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) the relevance of the CCP for EU central banks of issue and their monetary policy operations;
2018/04/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 2 a – subparagraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) the liquidity risks of the CCP embedded by the CCP activities, in particular the physical settlement requirements it implies in Union currencies.
2018/04/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 2 c – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The recommendation shall assess the net benefits of such a move with regards to safeguarding the interests of EU taxpayers and financial stability.
2018/04/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point g a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012
Article 25 – paragraph 7 a (new)
(g a) In Article 25, the following paragraph 7a is inserted : 7a. ESMA shall establish effective cooperation arrangements with the competent authorities of the Tier 2 CCPs covering the following: (a) the mechanism for the coordination of supervisory activities, including the exchange of information and reporting to be made; (b) procedures for the coordination of supervisory activities between ESMA and the third country competent authority in case of a default of a clearing member established in the Union; (c) access to all relevant information requested by ESMA regarding CCPs authorised in that third country; (d) the coordination of supervisory activities including, where appropriate, on-site inspections; (e) the consultation of ESMA in the drawing up of the resolution plan of a Tier 2 CCP; (f) the notification process from a third country competent authority to ESMA when it deems a Tier 2 CCP to be in breach of the conditions of its authorisation; (g) the coordination of recovery and resolution activities between ESMA and the resolution authorities of the third countries concerned in case where a CCP is deemed failing of likely to fail.
2018/04/13
Committee: ECON