BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

4 Amendments of Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ related to 2017/0035(COD)

Amendment 21 #
Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) The voting rules for the appeal committee should be changed in order to reduce the risk of no opinion being delivered and to provide an incentive for Member State representatives to take a clear position. To this end only Member States which are present or represented, and which do not abstain, should be considered as participating Member States for the calculation of the qualified majority. In order to ensure that the voting outcome is representative a vote should only be considered valid if a simple majority of the Member States are participating members of the appeal committee. If the quorum is not reached before expiry of the time-limit for the committee to take a decision, it will be considered that the committee delivered no opinion, as is the case today.deleted
2017/10/13
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 22 #
Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The Commission should have the possibility, in specific cases, to ask the Council and the European Parliament to indicate itstheir views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of an opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implications. The Commission should take account of any positions expressed by the Council and the European Parliament within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.
2017/10/13
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 27 #
Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Article 6 – paragraph 1
a) in paragraph 1, the following second subparagraph is added: "However, only members of the appeal committee who are present or represented at the time of the vote, and do not abstain from voting, shall be considered as participating members of the appeal committee. The majority referred to in Article 5(1) shall be the qualified majority referred to in Article 238(3) (a) TFEU. A vote shall only be considered to be valid if a simple majority of the Member States are participating members.";deleted
2017/10/13
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 29 #
Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
3a. Where no opinion is delivered in the appeal committee, the Commission may refer the matter to the Council for an opinion indicating its views and orientation on the wider implications of the absence of opinion, including the institutional, legal, political and international implicatand the European Parliament for an opinions. The Commission shall take account of any positions expressed by the Council and the European Parliament within 3 months after the referral. In duly justified cases, the Commission may indicate a shorter deadline in the referral.
2017/10/13
Committee: AGRI
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation