BETA

39 Amendments of Kostas CHRYSOGONOS related to 2017/0355(COD)

Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure effectiveness of the rights provided by the Union law, the personal scope of Directive 91/533/EEC should be updated. In its case law, the Court of Justice of the European Union has established criteria for determining the status of a worker34 which are appropriate for determining the personal scope of application of this Directive. The definition of worker in Article 2(1) is based on these criteria. They ensure a uniform implementation of the personal scope of the Directive while leaving it to national authorities and courts to apply it to specific situations. Provided that they fulfil those criteria, domestic workers, on-demand workers, intermittent workers, voucher based-workers, platform workers, trainees and apprentices couldmust come within scope of this Directive. __________________ 34 Judgments of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85; 14 October 2010, Union Syndicale Solidaires Isère, Case C-428/09; 9 July 2015, Balkaya, Case C-229/14; 4 December 2014, FNV Kunsten, Case C-413/13; and 17 November 2016, Ruhrlandklinik, Case C- 216/15.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the increasing number of workers excluded from the scope of Directive 91/533/EEC on the basis of derogations made by Member States under Article 1 of that Directive, it is necessary to replace these derogations with a possibility for Member States not to apply the provisions of the Directive to a work relationship equal to or less than 8 hours in total in a reference period of one month. That derogation does not affect the definition of a worker as provided for in Article 2(1).deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Due to the unpredictability of on- demand work including zero-hour contracts, the derogation of 8 hours per month should not be used for employment relationships in which no guaranteed amount of paid work is determined before the start of the employment.deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Several different natural or legal persons may in practice assume the functions and responsibilities of an employer. Member States should remain free to determine more precisely the person(s) who are considered totally or, partially or jointly responsible for the execution of the obligations that this Directive lays down for employers, as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. Member States should also be able to decide that some or all of these obligations are to be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. Member States should be able to establish specific rules to exclude individuals acting as employers for domestic workers in the household from the obligations to consider and respond to a request for a different type of employment, to provide cost-free mandatory training, and from coverage of the redress mechanism based on favourable presumptions in the case of missing information in the written statement.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) Probationary periods allow employers to verify that workers are suitable for the position for which they have been engaged while providing them with accompanying support and training. Such periods may be accompanied by reduced protection against dismissal. Any entry into the labour market or transition to a new position should not be subject to prolonged insecurity. As established in the European Pillar of Social Rights, probationary periods should therefore be of reasonable duration. A substantial number of Member States have established a general maximum duration of probation between three and six months, which should be considered reasonable. Probationary periods may be longer than six months where this is justified by the nature of the employment such as for managerial positions and and should not be extended under any circumstance. Probationary periods may be longer than three months only where this is in the interest of the worker, such as in the case of long illness or in the context of specific measures promoting permanent employment notably for young workers.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) A reasonable minimum advance notice of fifteen days, understood as the period of time between the moment a worker is informed about a new work assignment and the moment the assignment starts, constitutes another necessary element of predictability of work for employment relationships with work schedule which are variable or mostly determined by the employer. The length of the advance notice period may varybe longer according to the needs of sectors, while ensuring adequate protection of workers. It applies without prejudice to Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.40 __________________ 40 Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 35).
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Pursuant to Directive 91/533/EEC the majority of workers in the Union have the right to receive written information about their working conditions. Directive 91/533/EEC does not however cover all workers in the Union, which is a necessity. Moreover, gaps in protection have emerged for new forms of employment created as a result of labour market developments since 1991.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) Social partners may consider that in specific sectors or situations different provisions are more appropriate, for the pursuit of the purpose of this Directive, than the minimum standards set in Chapter Three of this Directive. Member States should therefore be able to allow sSocial partners tocan conclude collective agreements modifying the provisions contained in that chapter, as long as the overall level of protection of workers is not lowered or is improved.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) The consultation on the European Pillar of Social Rights showed the need to strengthen enforcement of Union labour law to ensure its effectiveness. As regards Directive 91/533/EEC, the REFIT evaluation41 confirmed that strengthened enforcement mechanisms could improve its effectiveness. It showed that redress systems based solely on claims for damages are less effective than systems that also provide for sanctions (such as lump sums or loss of permits) for employers who fail to issue written statements. It also showed that employees rarely seek redress during the employment relationship, which jeopardises the goal of the provision of the written statement to ensure workers are informed about their essential features of their employment relationship. It is therefore necessary to introduce enforcement provisions which ensure the use either of favourable presumptions where information about the employment relationship is not provided, orand of an administrative procedure under which the employer may be required to provide the missing information and subject to sanction if it does not. That redress should be subject to a procedure by which the employer is notified that information is missing and has 15 days in which to supply complete and correct information. __________________ 41 SWD(2017)205 final, page 26.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) In implementing this Directive Member States should avoid imposing administrative, financial and legal constraints in a way which would hold back the creation and development of small and medium-sized undertakings. Member States are therefore invited to assess the impact of their transposition act on SMEs in order to make sure that SMEs are not disproportionately affected, with specific attention for micro- enterprises and for administrative burden, and to publish the results of such assessments.deleted
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure effectiveness of the rights provided by the Union law, the personal scope of Directive 91/533/EEC should be updated. In its case law, the Court of Justice of the European Union has established criteria for determining the status of a worker34 which are appropriate for determining the personal scope of application of this Directive. The definition of worker in Article 2(1) is based on these criteria. They ensure a uniform implementation of the personal scope of the Directive while leaving it to national authorities and courts to apply it to specific situations. Provided that they fulfil those criteria, domestic workers, on-demand workers, intermittent workers, voucher based-workers, platform workers, trainees and apprentices cshould come within scope of this Directive. __________________ 34 Judgments of 3 July 1986, Deborah Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85; 14 October 2010, Union Syndicale Solidaires Isère, Case C-428/09; 9 July 2015, Balkaya, Case C-229/14; 4 December 2014, FNV Kunsten, Case C-413/13; and 17 November 2016, Ruhrlandklinik, Case C- 216/15.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive lays down minimum rights that apply to every worker in the Unpublic and private sector in the European Union without exception.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the increasing number of workers excluded from the scope of Directive 91/533/EEC on the basis of derogations made by Member States under Article 1 of that Directive, it is necessary to replace these derogations with a possibility for Member States not to apply the provisions of the Directive to a work relationship equal to or less than 8 hours in total in a reference period of one month. That derogation does not affect the definition of a worker as provided for in Article 2(1).deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that employers are required to inform workers of the essential aspects of the employment relationship and that the workers have the right to demand such information.
2018/07/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
(9) Due to the unpredictability of on- demand work including zero-hour contracts, the derogation of 8 hours per month should not be used for employment relationships in which no guaranteed amount of paid work is determined before the start of the employment.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Several different natural or legal persons may in practice assume the functions and responsibilities of an employer. Member States should remain free to determine more precisely the person(s) who are considered totally or, partially or jointly responsible for the execution of the obligations that this Directive lays down for employers, as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. Member States should also be able to decide that some or all of these obligations are to be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. Member States should be able to establish specific rules to exclude individuals acting as employers for domestic workers in the household from the obligations to consider and respond to a request for a different type of employment, to provide cost-free mandatory training, and from coverage of the redress mechanism based on favourable presumptions in the case of missing information in the written statement.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) A reasonable minimum advance notice of fifteen days, understood as the period of time between the moment a worker is informed about a new work assignment and the moment the assignment starts, constitutes another necessary element of predictability of work for employment relationships with work schedule which are variable or mostly determined by the employer. The length of the advance notice period may varybe longer according to the needs of sectors, while ensuring adequate protection of workers. It applies without prejudice to Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.40 __________________ 40 Directive 2002/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 on the organisation of the working time of persons performing mobile road transport activities (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 35).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) In implementing this Directive Member States should avoid imposing administrative, financial and legal constraints in a way which would hold back the creation and development of small and medium-sized undertakings. Member States are therefore invited to assess the impact of their transposition act on SMEs in order to make sure that SMEs are not disproportionately affected, with specific attention for micro- enterprises and for administrative burden, and to publish the results of such assessments.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) The Member States mayshould entrust and consult social partners withabout the implementation of this Directive, where social partners jointly request to do so and as long as the Member States take all the necessary steps to ensure that they can at all times guarantee the results sought under this Directive.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The purpose of this Directive is to improve working conditions byto promoting more secure ande safe, predictable employment while ensuring labour market adaptabilityand with decent conditions, having in consideration technical and scientific developments.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive lays down minimum rights that apply to every worker in the Unpublic and private sector in the European Union without exception.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may decide not to apply the obligations in this Directive to workers who have an employment relationship equal to or less than 8 hours in total in a reference period of one month. Time worked with all employers forming or belonging to the same enterprise, group or entity shall count towards that 8 hour period.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. Paragraph 3 shall not apply to an employment relationship where no guaranteed amount of paid work is predetermined before the employment starts.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 5
5. Member States may determine which, after consulting social partners, shall determine which natural or legal persons are responsible for the execution of the obligations for employers laid down by this Directive as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. They mayshall also decide that all or part of these obligations shall be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. Where one or more natural or legal person(s) who is or are directly or indirectly party to an employment relationship with a worker, shall be jointly and severally liable for obligations under this Directive. This paragraph is without prejudice to Directive 2008/104/EC.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 6
6. Member States may decide not to apply the obligations set out in Articles 10 and 11 and Article 14(a) to natural persons belonging to a household where work is performed for that household.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ‘worker’ means a natural person who for a certain period of time performs services for and/or under the direction of another natural or legal person in return for remuneration;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that employers are required to inform workers of the essential aspects of the employment relationship and that the workers have the right to demand such information.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall include at least:
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) in the case of a temporary employment relationship, the end date or the expected duration thereof; the name of the user undertaking in case of temporary agency workers as well as the pay scales of the user undertaking;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i
(i) the procedure, including the length of the period of notice, to be observed by the employer and the worker should their employment relationship be terminated or, where the length of the period of notice cannot be indicated when the information is given, the method for determining such period of notice; the procedure and the deadline for taking legal action contesting the dismissal;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) the initial basic amount, any other component elements, the frequency and method of payment of the remuneration to which the worker is entitled, in addition, payments of overtime, bonuses and other entitlements and the method of calculation;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l – point ii
(ii) the minimum advance notice the worker shall receive before the start of a work assignment, that shall be at least fifteen days;
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The information referred to in paragraph 1(b) and 2(a) may, where appropshall be handed to the worker in a wriatte, be givn document in the form of a reference to the laws, regulations and administrative or statutory provisions or collective agreements governing those particularlanguage of the worker and, when requested by the worker, can additionally be provided and transmitted also electronically as long as it is easily accessible by the worker, the receipt is acknowledged and can be stored and porintsed.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Unless Member States provide otherwise, paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply if the duration of each work period outside the Member State in which the worker habitually works is four consecutive weeks or less.deleted
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) if the worker is informed by their employer of a work assignment a reasonable period in advance of fifteen days, in accordance with Article 3(2)(l)(ii).
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 b (new)
When the period of notice is not respected by the employer, the worker is entitled to refuse the requirement. The employer can not penalise the worker when this refusal is made.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that where employers are required by Union or national legislation or relevant collective agreements to provide training to workers to carry out the work for which they are employed, such training shall be provided cost-free to the worker and, when possible, within working hours.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 770 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 a (new)
Article 12a Equal payment The Member States shall ensure the principle of equal pay and terms and conditions to apply to all workers regardless of their employment status. The Member States shall ensure the abolition of discrimination with regard to all aspects and conditions of remuneration and terms and conditions of employment; the employment status is not being of relevance.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 866 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive shall not constitute valid grounds for reducing the general level of protection already afforded to workers within Member States and in relation to areas to which it applies.
2018/06/28
Committee: EMPL