BETA

31 Amendments of Kostas CHRYSOGONOS related to 2018/0170(COD)

Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) According to the Commission Report on Evaluation of the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 the extent to which Regulation No 883/2013 makes national law applicable is not completely clear. Different interpretations of the relevant provisions, and differences in national law, lead to a fragmentation in the exercise of OLAF's powers in the Member States, in some cases hindering OLAF’s ability to successfully conduct investigations and ultimately to contribute to the Treaty objective of an effective protection of the financial interests across the Union.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2 a) According to the Commission Report on Evaluation of the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 the extent to which Regulation 883/2013 makes national law applicable is not completely clear. Different interpretations of the relevant provisions, and differences in national law, lead to a fragmentation in the exercise of OLAF's powers in the Member States, in some cases hindering OLAF’s ability to successfully conduct investigations and ultimately to contribute to the Treaty objective of an effective protection of the financial interests across the Union.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) In view of their common goal to preserve the integrity of the Union budget, the Office and the EPPO should establish and maintain a close relationship based on sincere cooperation and aimed at ensuring the complementarity of their respective mandates and coordination of their action, in particular as regards the scope of the enhanced cooperation for the establishment on the EPPO. Ultimately, the relationship should contribute to ensuring that all means are used to protect the financial interests of the Union and avoiding unnecessary duplication of efforts. However, in various cases, the activities of OLAF and the EPPO will not need to be coordinated due to their distinct mandates, with the EPPO conducting criminal investigations and OLAF administrative investigations focusing on financial, disciplinary and administrative follow-up.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) In view of their common goal to preserve the integrity of the Union budget, the Office and the EPPO should establish and maintain a close relationship based on sincere cooperation and aimed at ensuring the complementarity of their respective mandates and coordination of their action, in particular as regards the scope of the enhanced cooperation for the establishment on the EPPO. Ultimately, the relationship should contribute to ensuring that all means are used to protect the financial interests of the Union and avoiding unnecessary duplication of efforts. However, in various cases, the activities of OLAF and the EPPO will not need to be coordinated due to their distinct mandates, with the EPPO conducting criminal investigations and OLAF administrative investigations focusing on financial, disciplinary and administrative follow-up.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4 a) Once the EPPO is established, OLAF’s overall mandate shall not change, but its operation shall be adapted in several ways to the existence of the EPPO. OLAF shall remain competent for the administrative investigation of suspected fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities within the Union IBOAs and in all Member States, with a view to issuing recommendations to launch judicial, disciplinary, financial or administrative procedures.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Once the EPPO is established, OLAF’s overall mandate shall not change, but its operation shall be adapted in several ways to the existence of the EPPO. OLAF shall remain competent for the administrative investigation of suspected fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities within the Union IBOAs and in all Member States, with a view to issuing recommendations to launch judicial, disciplinary, financial or administrative procedures.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) The early and without delay transmission of information by the Office for the purpose of adopting precautionary measures is an essential tool for the protection of the Union's financial interests. In order to ensure close cooperation in this regard between the Office and the institutions, offices, bodies and agencies of the Union, it is appropriate that the latter have the possibility to consult at any time the Office with a view to deciding on any appropriate precautionary measures, including measures for the safeguarding of evidence.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) The early and without delay transmission of information by the Office for the purpose of adopting precautionary measures is an essential tool for the protection of the Union's financial interests. In order to ensure close cooperation in this regard between the Office and the institutions, offices, bodies and agencies of the Union, it is appropriate that the latter have the possibility to consult at any time the Office with a view to deciding on any appropriate precautionary measures, including measures for the safeguarding of evidence.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. In the exercise of these powers, the Office shall comply with the procedural guarantees provided for in this Regulation and in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96. In the conduct of an on-the-spot check and inspection, the economic operator concerned shall have the right not to make self-incriminating statements and to be assisted by a person of choice. When making statements during the on the spot checks, the economic operator shall be provided with the possibility to use any of the official languages of the Member State where he is located. The right to be assisted by a person of choice shall not prevent access by the Office to the premises of the economic operator, and shall not unduly delay the start of the check.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
At the request of the Office, the competent authority of the Member State concerned shall provide without delay the staff of the Office with the assistance needed in order to carry out their tasks effectively, as specified in the written authorisation referred to in Article 7(2).
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. In the exercise of these powers, the Office shall comply with the procedural guarantees provided for in this Regulation and in Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96. In the conduct of an on-the-spot check and inspection, the economic operator concerned shall have the right not to make self-incriminating statements and to be assisted by a person of choice. When making statements during the on the spot checks, the economic operator shall be provided with the possibility to use any of the official languages of the Member State where he is located. The right to be assisted by a person of choice shall not prevent access by the Office to the premises of the economic operator, and shall not unduly delay the start of the check.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
The Member State concerned shall ensure, in accordance with Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, that the staff of the Office are allowed access to all information and documents relating to the matter under investigation which prove necessary in order for the on-the-spot checks and inspection to be carried out effectively and efficiently, and that they are able to assume custody of documents or data to ensure that there is no danger of their disappearance. The fundamental rights, and in particular the right to privacy, shall be fully respected.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 3 – paragraph 6
At the request of the Office, the competent authority of the Member State concerned shall provide without delay the staff of the Office with the assistance needed in order to carry out their tasks effectively, as specified in the written authorisation referred to in Article 7(2).
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 3 – paragraph 6
The Member State concerned shall ensure, in accordance with Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, that the staff of the Office are allowed access to all information and documents relating to the matter under investigation which prove necessary in order for the on-the-spot checks and inspection to be carried out effectively and efficiently, and that they are able to assume custody of documents or data to ensure that there is no danger of their disappearance. The fundamental rights, and in particular the right to privacy, shall be fully respected.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 3 – paragraph 9
9. During an external investigation, the Office may have access to any relevant information and data, irrespective of the medium on which it is stored, held by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, connected with the matter under investigation, where necessary in order to establish whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union, whilst respecting the confidentiality of the investigations, the legitimate rights of the persons concerned and, where appropriate, national provisions applicable to judicial proceedings. For that purpose Article 4(2) and (4) shall apply.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 3 – paragraph 9
9. During an external investigation, the Office may have access to any relevant information and data, irrespective of the medium on which it is stored, held by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, connected with the matter under investigation, where necessary in order to establish whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union, whilst respecting the confidentiality of the investigations, the legitimate rights of the persons concerned and, where appropriate, national provisions applicable to judicial proceedings. For that purpose Article 4(2) and (4) shall apply.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 5 – paragraph – subparagraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 12d, the Director-General may open an investigation when there is a sufficient suspicion or strong indications, which may also be based on information provided by any third party or anonymous information, that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union.;
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point d
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 7 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
In addition to the first subparagraph, the institution, body, office or agency concerned may at any time consult the Office with a view to taking, in close cooperation with the Office, any appropriate precautionary measures, including measures for the safeguarding of evidence, and shall inform the Office without delay of such decision. The Office shall cooperate constructively and in full synergy with the institution body, office or agency concerned;
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Without prejudice to Article 12d, the Director-General may open an investigation when there is a sufficient suspicion or when there are strong indications, which may also be based on information provided by any third party or anonymous information, that there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union.;
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point d
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 7 – paragraph 6
In addition to the first subparagraph, the institution, body, office or agency concerned may at any time consult the Office with a view to taking, in close cooperation with the Office, any appropriate precautionary measures, including measures for the safeguarding of evidence, and shall inform the Office without delay of such decision.; The Office shall cooperate constructively and in full synergy with the institution body, office or agency concerned;
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 8 – paragraph 2
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and, unless prevented by national law, the competent authorities of the Member States shall, at the request of the Office or on their own initiative, transmit without delay to the Office any document or information they hold which relates to an ongoing investigation by the Office.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and, unless prevented by national law, the competent authorities of the Member States shall transmit without delay to the Office any other document or information considered pertinent which they hold relating to the fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union.;
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and, unless prevented by national law, the competent authorities of the Member States shall, at the request of the Office or on their own initiative, transmit without delay to the Office any document or information they hold which relates to an ongoing investigation by the Office.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The report may be accompanied by documented recommendations of the Director-General on action to be taken. Those recommendations shall, where appropriate, indicate any disciplinary, administrative, financial and/or judicial action by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and by the competent authorities of the Member States concerned, and shall specify in particular the estimated amounts to be recovered, as well as the preliminary classification in law of the facts established.;
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 (new)
The Office shall take proper internal measures to ensure the consistent quality of final reports and recommendations, and consider whether there is a need to revise the Guidelines on Investigation Procedures, to address any possible inconsistencies.
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and, unless prevented by national law, the competent authorities of the Member States shall transmit without delay to the Office any other document or information considered pertinent which they hold relating to the fight against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union.;
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Reports drawn up by the Office shall constitute admissible evidence in judicial proceedings before the Union courts and in administrative proceedings in the Union, provided that they have been drawn up lawfully.;
2018/11/26
Committee: JURI
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)
(a a) the following paragraph 5a is added: "The investigative acts carried out by OLAF are subject to judicial review by the Court of Justice pursuant to Article 263 TFEU."
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The report may be accompanied by well documented recommendations of the Director-General on action to be taken. Those recommendations shall, where appropriate, indicate any disciplinary, administrative, financial and/or judicial action by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and by the competent authorities of the Member States concerned, and shall specify in particular the estimated amounts to be recovered, as well as the preliminary classification in law of the facts established.;
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The Office shall take proper internal measures to ensure the consistent quality of final reports and recommendations, and consider whether there is a need to revise the Guidelines on Investigation Procedures, to address any possible inconsistencies.
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point b
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Reports drawn up by the Office shall constitute admissible evidence in judicial proceedings before the Union courts and in administrative proceedings in the Union provided that they have been drawn up lawfully.;
2018/12/03
Committee: LIBE