BETA

Activities of Emmanouil KEFALOGIANNIS

Plenary speeches (3)

Outcome of the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of EU Agriculture (debate)
2024/09/16
The extreme wildfires in Southern Europe, in particular Portugal and Greece and the need for further EU climate action on adaptation and mitigation (debate)
2024/10/07
Condemning the illegal unilateral declaration of independence of the secessionist entity in Cyprus and all efforts to legitimise it and reaffirming the need for European solidarity - 41 years after (debate)
2024/11/25

Written questions (16)

Cyprus is the only EU Member State still under military occupation, 50 years on from the illegal Turkish invasion
2024/07/22
Documents: PDF(63 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Unacceptable statements and actions by the new political and State leadership of Skopje
2024/07/24
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU support for livestock farmers in response to the disastrous impact of the spread of sheep and goat plague
2024/07/29
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
The conduction of the Himara election and protection of the properties of the ethnic Greek minority
2024/08/06
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU support in restoring Attica’s natural treasures
2024/08/13
Documents: PDF(53 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Lethal fires in Attica
2024/09/05
Documents: PDF(56 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Resilient policies are needed to protect agriculture from the effects of drought
2024/09/13
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU programmes to support the use of AI on small family-run farms
2024/09/30
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
EU support for Thessaly’s tourism sector, which is suffering the effects of the climate crisis
2024/10/09
Documents: PDF(55 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Orange juice cartel
2024/10/18
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Drought in Greece
2024/10/22
Documents: PDF(51 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Immediate compensation for Greek livestock farmers to deal with the sheep and goat pox outbreak
2024/10/24
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Monitoring social media pages that spread inaccurate and irredentist narratives
2024/10/28
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Measures against Azerbaijan for inviting representatives of the pseudo-state in the occupied territories of Cyprus to a meeting of the Organisation of Turkic States
2024/10/30
Documents: PDF(49 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Method of distributing reserve funds for agricultural crises
2024/11/11
Documents: PDF(52 KB) DOC(10 KB)
Support for Greek beekeeping in light of the negative consequences of climate change and increased production costs
2024/11/14
Documents: PDF(50 KB) DOC(10 KB)

Amendments (838)

Amendment 325 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – indent 1
– the need to improve relations with Türkiye; welcomes the partial de- escalation of tensions in the east Mediterranean and the Aegean; while also noting with concern that Türkiye maintains unfounded claims against the sovereignty and sovereign rights of EU Member States, reiterates its concern that Türkiye’s foreign policy continues to be at odds with EU priorities under the CFSP;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 352 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – indent 2
– the urgeimportancye for the EU and the Turkish Government to move forward toward a mutual reflection process which leads to areflect on ways to develop a cooperative and mutually beneficial, more dynamic and strategic partnership, in line, most recently, with the European Council Conclusions of 17-18 April 2024,considering the key role played by Türkiye in the region and its significance as a NATO ally;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 367 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – indent 3 a (new)
– the strategic interest of the EU in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Türkiye in a phased, proportionate and reversible manner, subject to the established conditionalities set out in European Council Conclusions;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 377 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – indent 4 a (new)
– the particular importance that the European Union attaches in this regard to resumption of and progress in the Cyprus settlement talks in further enhancing EU- Türkiye cooperation;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 450 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the EU and its Member States to provide humanitarian assistance, military support, economic and financial aid and political support in every possible way until Ukraine’s victory in order to ultimately stop Russia’s war of aggression and allow Ukraine to liberate all its people and re-establish full control within its internationally recognised borders; underlines in particular the urgent need to provide Ukraine with increased air defence capacities to defend its critical energy infrastructure ahead of the forthcoming winter, and calls on the Member States to immediately lift restrictions on the use of Western weapons systems delivered to Ukraine against legitimate military targets on Russian territorynotes at the same time that military support, including supplies from third states through all available EU instruments, will be provided in full respect of the security and defence policy of certain Member States and taking into account the security and defence interests of all Member States;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 493 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Unwaveringly supports the 10-point peace plan put forward by Ukraine’s President Zelenskyy and recalls that any initiative aimed at ending the Russian war of aggression needs to be based on input provided by Ukrainethe principles of the UN Charter and international law and ultimately accepted by Ukraine and the Ukrainian people;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 507 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates that Ukraine, as a victim of aggression, has the legitimate right to self-defence in line with Article 51 of the UN Charter; calls on the VP/HR, the Commission the Council and the Member States concerned to enable effective Ukrainian countermeasures against Russia; recalls that Russia has violated international law and that the full seizure of the frozenand that, subject to the EU law, Russian's assets is an appropriate step towards enforcing Russia’s obligation to abide by international law, and to compensate Ukraine and other injured partiesshould remain immobilized until Russia ceases its war of aggression against Ukraine and compensates it for the lossesdamage caused by Russia’s war of aggressionthis war;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 521 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Underscores the urgent need for the EU and its Member States to push for the creationestablishment of a special international tribunal to prosecutetribunal for the crime of aggression committed against Ukraine by the political and military leadership of the Russian Federation and its allies; any relevant solution should pay due respect to the competences of the statutory branches of the Council of Europe and must also be based on a solid legal basis, enjoy the widest possible legitimacy and cross-regional support and address all relevant legal issues, including immunity, in accordance with international law and the highest standards of international criminal justice;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 626 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Welcomes the EU’s decision to renew sanctions against Iran until July 2025, including by sanctioning Iran’s production of unmanned drones and missiles and its supply thereof to Russia and the wider Middle Eastern region; points out that the sanctioning options that have not yet been exhausted include a much more restrictive approach to technology transfers through exports of products that are not categorised as ‘dual- use’; recalls that the European Parliament has called for Hezbollah and the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to be added to the EU list of terrorist organisations;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 638 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Highlights the strong links between Iran and the IRGC, its proxies such as the Houthis, Iraqi and Syrian militias, and organisations on the EU terrorist list, namely Hamas and Hezbollah’s military wing; calls on the Council and the VP/HR to add Hezbollah in its entirety to the EU list of terrorist organisations; deplores Hezbollah’s attacks against Israel which have resulted in an Israeli ground invasion in Lebanon; is deeply concerned about the situation in Lebanon and recalls the need for a cessation of hostilities as soon as possible to create space for a diplomatic solution along the Blue Line, consistent with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, as the only path to de- escalate tensions and stabilise the Israel- Lebanon border in a durable manner; to this end the EU deplores all recent attacks against UNIFIL and reiterates the inviolability of all UN personnel and premises. Such attacks must stop immediately;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 794 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Reiterates that Taiwan is a key EU partner and a democratic ally in the Indo- Pacific region; recognises the importance of Taiwan in securing global supply chains, especially in the high-tech sector, and urges the EU and its Member States to engage in closer cooperation with Taiwan; calls for the EU and its Member States to ensure, through clear and consistent signalling, that any attempt to unilaterally change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait, particularly by means of force or coercion, cannot be accepted and will have high costs; highlights that China’s territorial claims have no basis in international law; denounces, furthermore, China’s blocking of Taiwan’s participation in multilateral organisations; calls on the Commission and the Member States to support Taiwan’s meaningful participation in relevant international organisations;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 979 #

2024/2080(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43 – indent 3
– to reiterate his support for the ongoing work by the EU Police and Rule of Law Mission for the occupied Palestinian territory (EUPOL COPPS) and the EU Border Assistance Mission (EU BAM) in Rafah in assisting with the Palestinian authorities’ security and justice sector reform and integrated border management; reiterates the support to the European Commission’s plan for emergency financial support to the Palestinian Authority, aiming at the latter’s reform, recovery, resilience and effective governance;
2024/11/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #

2023/2106(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes with concern efforts to upgrade the secessionist entity in occupied Cyprus at the Organization of Turkic States and calls on the Central Asian states concerned to effectively uphold the respect of the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states and to not ratify the amended Statute of the Organization of Turkic States, which would put into effect the decision to grant observer status to the secessionist entity in occupied Cyprus;
2023/10/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas cohesion policy isremains and ought to remain the main investment policy for the EU’s regions and cities and the Territorial Agenda is the guiding instrument for the European Union’s territorial policy;
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 19 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas it appears that the main difficulties encountered by local actors for the period 2014-2020 were, as well as in the present, have been a lack of skills and knowledge, in addition to a slow absorption of funds and bureaucratic barriers;
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 34 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the Territorial Agenda 2030 (TA2030) invites the European Parliament and its Committee on Regional Development as responsible for economic, social and territorial cohesion, to take its objectives into account by advocating its priorities in EU legislative processes;
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 44 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas implementation of the (TA2030) priorities remains uneven across the Union;, in particular taking into consideration spatial disparities such as insularity condition.
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 53 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that, in the period 2014- 2020, only 28 % of strategies for sustainable urban development (SUDs) were implemented through ITIs; calls on the Commission to take action to encourage the use of such tools to develop the TA2030, in particular through stepped-up communication activities;
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 63 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Member States to promote strategic spatial planning that takes into account territories as a whole beyond metropolitan, urban and functional urban areas;
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 96 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the need to involve the European Parliament, and in particular its competent Committee on Regional Development, in the pilot actions, as well as to promote and extend their results at European level, which can be integrated and coordinated with initiatives such as cohesion policy, including the ERDF and Interreg;
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 107 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to promote the implementation of the TA2030 beyond pilot actions, making this instrument a reference framework for action that provides concrete guidelines for EU territories to improve their performance; highlights the opportunity to make regional funding conditional on achieving TA2030 priorities and calls on the Commission to develop monitoring indicators linking the TA2030 and the use of cohesion policy funds, in particular the ERFDF;
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 124 #

2023/2048(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for key actors, such as the European Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee, to have a more active role in the follow-up and further development of the TA2030;
2023/10/03
Committee: REGI
Amendment 2 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) It is in the common interest of the Union and its Western Balkans partners1 to advance the efforts to reform political, legal and , educational and socio-economic systems of the latter with a view to their future Union membership. The prospect of Union membership has a powerful transformative effect, embedding positive democratic, political, economic and societal change. _________________ 1 Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo*, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia.* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 2 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) It is in the common interest of the Union and its Western Balkans partners1 to advance the efforts to reform political, legal and , educational and socio-economic systems of the latter with a view to their future Union membership. The prospect of Union membership has a powerful transformative effect, embedding positive democratic, political, economic and societal change. _________________ 1 Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo*, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia.* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 11 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) To achieve these goals, special emphasis with respect to investment areas should be placed on sectors that are likely to function as key multipliers for social and economic development: connectivity, including transport, energy, green and digital transitions, education, research and skills development.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 11 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) To achieve these goals, special emphasis with respect to investment areas should be placed on sectors that are likely to function as key multipliers for social and economic development: connectivity, including transport, energy, green and digital transitions, education, research and skills development.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 24 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) Any measures under the Facility should be fully compliant with the fundamental values of the European Union as stated in Article 3 of the TFEU and contribute to the promotion of the multilevel governance and partnership principles, the place-based approach and the achievement of gradual integration on economic, social and territorial cohesion of the beneficiaries, in line with the spirit of the cohesion policy laiddown in Articles 174 and 155 TFEU.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 24 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) Any measures under the Facility should be fully compliant with the fundamental values of the European Union as stated in Article 3 of the TFEU and contribute to the promotion of the multilevel governance and partnership principles, the place-based approach and the achievement of gradual integration on economic, social and territorial cohesion of the beneficiaries, in line with the spirit of the cohesion policy laiddown in Articles 174 and 155 TFEU.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The implementation of this Regulation should be guided by the principles of equality and non- discrimination, as elaborated in the Union of Equality strategies. It should promote gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls, and seek to protect and promote women’s and girls’ rights in line with the EU Gender Action Plans and relevant Council conclusions and international conventions. The implementation of the Facility should be in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and ensure accessibility in itsStrategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030. All national plans should ensure accessibility and independent living in their investments and technical assistance for all vulnerable groups.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 30 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) The implementation of this Regulation should be guided by the principles of equality and non- discrimination, as elaborated in the Union of Equality strategies. It should promote gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls, and seek to protect and promote women’s and girls’ rights in line with the EU Gender Action Plans and relevant Council conclusions and international conventions. The implementation of the Facility should be in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and ensure accessibility in itsStrategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030. All national plans should ensure accessibility and independent living in their investments and technical assistance for all vulnerable groups.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 44 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) accelerate the socio-economic convergence of Beneficiaries’ economies with the Union and promote their territorial cohesion;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 44 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) accelerate the socio-economic convergence of Beneficiaries’ economies with the Union and promote their territorial cohesion;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 49 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) promote the cross-border cooperation within the Beneficiaries, including regions located at the EU's external borders, address common challenges, foster partnerships and boost economic development, social cohesion and environmental sustainability;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 49 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) promote the cross-border cooperation within the Beneficiaries, including regions located at the EU's external borders, address common challenges, foster partnerships and boost economic development, social cohesion and environmental sustainability;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 53 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) promote the cross-border cooperation within the Beneficiaries, including regions located at the EU's external borders in oder to achieve energy efficiency and green transition;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 53 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) promote the cross-border cooperation within the Beneficiaries, including regions located at the EU's external borders in oder to achieve energy efficiency and green transition;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 55 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) boost innovation, particularly for MSMEs, SMEs and in support of the green and digital transitions;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 55 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) boost innovation, particularly for MSMEs, SMEs and in support of the green and digital transitions;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) boost quality education, research, training, reskilling and upskilling, and employment policies based on European skills agenda;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) boost quality education, research, training, reskilling and upskilling, and employment policies based on European skills agenda;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 60 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(h a) encourage the comprehensive strategic approach, combining reforms and investments in order to reduce brain drain and promote the Harnessing Talent Platform
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 60 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(h a) encourage the comprehensive strategic approach, combining reforms and investments in order to reduce brain drain and promote the Harnessing Talent Platform
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 64 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
(i a) promote economic, social and territorial cohesion in the long term within the Beneficiaries, including at intra-regional level;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 64 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
(i a) promote economic, social and territorial cohesion in the long term within the Beneficiaries, including at intra-regional level;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 65 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i b (new)
(i b) promote national reforms that enable urban transformations and facilitate the implementation of public investment, boosting coordination with the urban national policies, including for administrative capacity support;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 65 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i b (new)
(i b) promote national reforms that enable urban transformations and facilitate the implementation of public investment, boosting coordination with the urban national policies, including for administrative capacity support;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 77 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Measures under the Reform Agendas shall be based on the "do no harm to cohesion", the subsidiarity and the multilevel governance principles, building on the involvement of regions and cities. Territorial and place-based approaches of the activities under this Facility shall allow its intervention in relevant economic areas and particularly promote the links between rural and urban areas.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 77 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Measures under the Reform Agendas shall be based on the "do no harm to cohesion", the subsidiarity and the multilevel governance principles, building on the involvement of regions and cities. Territorial and place-based approaches of the activities under this Facility shall allow its intervention in relevant economic areas and particularly promote the links between rural and urban areas.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 79 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. The qualitative measures of Reform Agendas shall be based on the Quadruple innovation helix framework, to guarantee a better impact of the reforms and investments in the societies of the Beneficiaires.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 79 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. The qualitative measures of Reform Agendas shall be based on the Quadruple innovation helix framework, to guarantee a better impact of the reforms and investments in the societies of the Beneficiaires.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 81 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6
6. The resources referred to in paragraph 2 point (b) may be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Facility, such as preparatory actions, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, which are required for the management of the Facility and the achievement of its objectives, in particular studies, meetings of experts, trainings, consultations with the Beneficiary authorities, conferences, consultation of local and regional authorities, civil society and stakeholders, information and communication actions, including inclusive outreach actions, and corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, insofar as they are related to the objectives of this Regulation, expenses linked to IT networks focusing on information processing and exchange, corporate information technology tools, as well as all other expenditure at headquarters and Union delegations for the administrative and coordination support needed for the Facility. Finally, expenses may also cover the costs of other supporting activities such as quality control and monitoring of projects or programmes on the ground and the costs of peer counselling and experts for the assessment and implementation of reforms and investments.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 81 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 6
6. The resources referred to in paragraph 2 point (b) may be used for technical and administrative assistance for the implementation of the Facility, such as preparatory actions, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities, which are required for the management of the Facility and the achievement of its objectives, in particular studies, meetings of experts, trainings, consultations with the Beneficiary authorities, conferences, consultation of local and regional authorities, civil society and stakeholders, information and communication actions, including inclusive outreach actions, and corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, insofar as they are related to the objectives of this Regulation, expenses linked to IT networks focusing on information processing and exchange, corporate information technology tools, as well as all other expenditure at headquarters and Union delegations for the administrative and coordination support needed for the Facility. Finally, expenses may also cover the costs of other supporting activities such as quality control and monitoring of projects or programmes on the ground and the costs of peer counselling and experts for the assessment and implementation of reforms and investments.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The design and implementation of the measures under the Reform Agendas shall be developed in partnership with local and regional authorities, industry, univerisities and civil society, and shall promote their institutional capacity to guarantee the ownership of the reforms and the impact of the investments.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 88 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The design and implementation of the measures under the Reform Agendas shall be developed in partnership with local and regional authorities, industry, univerisities and civil society, and shall promote their institutional capacity to guarantee the ownership of the reforms and the impact of the investments.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 90 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. Macro financial stability, sound public financial management, transparency, mutual trust between the different levels of governance and oversight of the budget are general conditions for payments that have to be fulfilled for any release of funds, as well as the capacity of national or sub-national authorities to manage funding programmes irrespective of their level of development.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 90 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. Macro financial stability, sound public financial management, transparency, mutual trust between the different levels of governance and oversight of the budget are general conditions for payments that have to be fulfilled for any release of funds, as well as the capacity of national or sub-national authorities to manage funding programmes irrespective of their level of development.
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 93 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the arrangements for the active partnership of the relevant levels of governance, industry, universities and civil society, effective monitoring, reporting and evaluation of the Reform Agenda by the Beneficiary, including the relevant indicators set out in paragraph 2;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 93 #

2023/0397(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the arrangements for the active partnership of the relevant levels of governance, industry, universities and civil society, effective monitoring, reporting and evaluation of the Reform Agenda by the Beneficiary, including the relevant indicators set out in paragraph 2;
2024/02/08
Committee: REGI
Amendment 5 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Turkey on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation,
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
– having regard to the negotiating framework for Turkey of 3 October 2005, and the fact that, as with all accession countries, Turkey’s accession to the EU depends on full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria, and to the need to normalise its relations with all EU Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus,
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the declaration issued by the European Community and its Member States on 21 September 2005 following the declaration made by Turkey upon its signature of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement on 29 July 2005, including the provision that the recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the negotiations, and to the need for Turkey to proceed with the normalisation of its relations with all Member States and to fully implement the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement towards all Member States by removing all obstacles to the free movement of goods, including restrictions on means of transport, without prejudice or discrimination,
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 b (new)
– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 of 11 November 2019 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s illegal drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean, as most recently renewed by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2186 of 8 November 2022
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to the UNESCO statement of 10 July 2020 on Hagia Sophia, Istanbul,
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Türkiye, in particular those of 7 June 2022 on the 2021 Commission Report on Turkey1 and of 19 May 2021 on the 2019-2020 Commission Reports on Turkey2 and of 26 November 2020 on escalating tensions in Varosha following the illegal actions by Turkey, _________________ 1 OJ C 493, 27.12.2022, p. 2. 2 OJ C 15, 12.1.2022, p. 81.
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
– having regard to the relevant resolutions by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, including the interim resolution of 16th September 2021 on the execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Cyprus v. Turkey,
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas Türkiye remains a candidate for EU accession, a NATO ally and a key trade and economic partner, as well as a key partner on migration;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the Russian war of aggression continues to cause unprecedented geopolitical shifts in Europe; whereas Türkiye’s key location allows it to play an instrumental, strategicmportant role in the events;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, in the aftermath of tensions between the EU and Turkey, particularly in relation to the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean, the European Council expressed readiness to engage with Turkey in a phased, proportionate and reversible manner in a number of areas of common interest provided that the de-escalation is sustained and that Turkey engages constructively, and subject to the established conditionalities set out in previous European Council conclusions;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 123 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reminds Türkiye that, as a candidate country, it is required to align itself with the EU acquis in all aspects, including values, interests, standards and policies, to respect and uphold the Copenhagen criteria, to align with EU policies and objectives, and to pursue and maintain good neighbourly relations with the EU and all its Member States without discrimination;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Regrets that, during the reporting period, limited or no progress at all has been registered in most fields. There was serious backsliding in key areas such as democracy, rule of law, fundamental rights and the independence of the press and the judiciary. In the field of good neighbourly relations, Türkiye’s aggression against Greece reached unprecedented levels up until the devastating earthquakes of February 2023;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Regrets Türkiye’s continued denial of access to vessels under the flag of one Member State, namely the Republic of Cyprus, to the Straits of Bosporus and the Dardanelles, as well as the additional unilateral measures taken on the flow of ships which complicated the transport of Ukrainian grain to ports outside Türkiye;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 143 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. AcknowledgesTakes note of the partial measures taken in recent months by the Turkish authorities to prevent the re-exportation to Russia of goods covered by EU sanctions, but urges them to go further in order to ensure that Türkiye stops being a hub for entities and individuals that wish to; underlines the paramount importance of preventing the circumvention of EU sanctions and urges Turkey to ensure the full respect of those sanctions, in particular taking into account the free circulation of products, including dual use goods, within the EU-Turkey Customs Union; highlights, its expectation that Turkey will avoid becoming a safe haven for Russian capital and investments, thus clearly circumvent suching EU sanctions;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 151 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on Türkiye to fully align itself with the sanctions and restrictive measures taken by the EU against the Russian and Belarusian authorities and individuals responsible for the illegal aggression against Ukraine and avoid becoming a safe haven for Russian capital and investments. Deplores the fact that circumvention of EU sanctions by Türkiye undermines the collective efforts of the EU and of its allies to limit Russia’s ability to continue its illegal, unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 158 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. DFurther deplores, against the backdrop of the war, the delaying of the ratification of Sweden’s NATO accession, which only plays into Russia’s hands; invites the Turkish authorities to deliver on their promise of a more constructive partnership in NATO and to ratify Sweden’s NATO membership in the Grand National Assembly as early as possible;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that, in terms of human rights and the rule of law, the desolate picture painted in its resolution of 7 June 2022 on the 2021 Commission Report on Turkey remains valid, and reiterates the content of that resolution; fully endorses the resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 12 October 2022, and the related report by its Monitoring Committee, on the honouring of obligations and commitments by Türkiye; calls on Turkey to fully implement all judgements of the European Court of Human Rights in line with Article 46 of the ECHR, as well as the payment of just satisfaction awarded by the ECtHR, an unconditional obligation deriving from Turkey’s membership of the Council of Europe;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 236 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Takes note of the efforts made by Turkey to continue hosting a large refugee population; welcomes, in this regard, the continued provision of EU funding for refugees and host communities in Turkey, and expresses its commitment to sustaining this support in the future; calls on the Commission to ensure the utmost transparency and accuracy in the allocation of funds under the successor to the Facility for Refugees in Turkey, ensuring that the funds are primarily given directly to the refugees and host communities and managed by organisations that guarantee accountability and transparency; supports an objective assessment of the cooperation between the EU and Turkey on refugees and migration matters and underlines the importance of both sides complying with their respective commitments under the EU-Turkey Joint Statement of 2016 and the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement vis-à vis all Member States, including the resumption of the readmission of returnees from the Greek islands, or the activation of the Voluntary Humanitarian Admissions Scheme; firmly objects to any instrumentalisation of migrants by the Turkish Government; notes that a continuing increase in asylum applications was registered in Cyprus over the past years and recalls Turkey’s obligation to take any necessary measures to prevent the creation of new sea or land routes for illegal migration from Turkey to the EU;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 244 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes, after a confrontational period, Türkiye’s recent steps towards normalising relations with several countries, such as Armenia, Egypt, Israel and the Gulf states, but remains concerned by the fact that Türkiye’s foreign policy still clashes in many aspects with EU interests and, far from growing closer to the EU, it has further diverged in the last year, reaching a record low of alignment with just 7 % of common foreign and security policy decisions; encourages Turkey to pave the way for genuine reconciliation between the Turkish and Armenian peoples, including settling the dispute of the Armenian Genocide, and to fully respect its obligations to protect Armenian and other cultural heritage; encourages Turkey, once again, to recognise the Armenian Genocide;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 249 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. WelcomesTakes note that, after a confrontational period, Türkiye’s recent steps towards normalising relations with several countries, such as Armenia, Egypt, Israel and the Gulf states, but remains concerned by the fact that Türkiye’s foreign policy still clashes in many aspects with EU interests and, far from growing closer to the EU, it has further diverged in the last year, reaching a record low of alignment with just 7 % of common foreign and security policy decisions;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 266 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the overall de-escalation of tensions observed in the eastern Mediterranean in recent times, particularly in the wake of the February earthquakes, and expresses its hope that a possible new era in Türkiye’s foreign policy might yield positive results in the bilateral relations between Türkiye and all EU Member States; reiterates its long-standing support for a solution to the Cyprus problem on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation and reaffirms its positions on the matter expressed in its resolution of 7 June 2022; mains fully aware that any positive dynamics can be easily reversed at any moment while the underlying issues remain unresolved; continues to urge Turkey to engage in a bona fide peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral action or threats; continues, in particular, to call Turkey to show genuine collective engagement to negotiating the delimitation of exclusive economic zones (EEZs) and the continental shelf in good faith and in line with international rules and principles; condemns, in this regard, the harassment by Turkish warships of research vessels performing surveys within the EEZ delimitated by the Republic of Cyprus; expresses its total solidarity with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus; reaffirms the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements on its EEZ and to explore and exploit its natural resources in full compliance with international law; reiterates its call on the Turkish Government to sign and ratify the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which is part of the EU acquis; supports the invitation extended to Turkey by the Government of the Republic of Cyprus to negotiate in good faith the maritime delimitation between their respective coast lines, or to have recourse to the International Court of Justice, and calls on Turkey to accept Cyprus’s invitation;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 270 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the overall de-escalation of tensions observedpositive momentum that appears to be developing recently in the eEastern Mediterranean in recent times, particularly in the wake offollowing the February earthquakes, and expresses its hopes that a possible new erAnkara will demonstrate a sin Türkiye’s foreign policy might yield positive results in the bilateral relations between Türkiycere commitment to good neighbourly relations, abandoning its aggressive and aill EU Member States; reiterates its long-standing support for a solution to the Cyprus problemegal practices and claims and engage in dialogue with Greece, in good faith and on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation and reaffirms its positions on the matter expressed in its resolution of 7 June 2022;international law, in order to resolve the only outstanding difference between the two countries, which is the delimitation of their respective EEZ and continental shelf.
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 288 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Reiterates its call on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the Akkuyu nuclear power plant, which is located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, therefore posing a major threat not only to Turkey, but also to the Mediterranean region; asks the Turkish Government to involve the governments of its neighbouring countries in relation to any further developments in the Akkuyu venture; to facilitate an experts’ mission of the International Atomic Energy Agency for inspection of the facility after the devastating earthquakes; to align its legislation with relevant EU acquis on nuclear safety and proceed with cross- border cooperation with neighboring states; to accede to the UN Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Trans-boundary Context and the UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters.
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 291 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Reiterates its long-standing support for a solution to the Cyprus problem on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation, with political equality, a single sovereignty, a single international personality and a single citizenship, in accordance with the relevant UN Security Council Resolutions, and reaffirms its positions on the matter expressed in its resolution of 7 June 2022;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 295 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Regrets the fact that the Cyprus problem remains unresolved and stresses that a solution in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and within the agreed framework will have a positive impact on Turkey’s relations with the EU; strongly reaffirms its view that the only sustainable solution to the Cyprus issue is that of a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement, including of its external aspects, within the UN framework, on the basis of a bi- communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty, single citizenship and political equality, as set out in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and in accordance with international law and on the basis of respect for the principles on which the Union is founded; deplores the fact that the Turkish Government has abandoned the agreed basis of the solution and the UN framework to defend on a two-state solution in Cyprus; calls on Turkey to abandon this unacceptable proposal for a two-state solution; strongly condemns any action to facilitate or assist in any way the international recognition of the secessionist entity in the occupied areas of Cyprus and stresses that such actions severely damages efforts to create an environment conducive to resuming settlement talks under the auspices of the United Nations; further calls on Turkey to withdraw its troops from Cyprus and refrain from any unilateral action which would entrench the permanent division of the island and to refrain from action altering the demographic balance; condemns the fact that Turkey continues to violate UN Security Council resolutions 550(1984) and 789(1992), which call on Turkey to transfer the area of Varosha to its lawful inhabitants under the temporary administration of the UN, by supporting the opening of the town of Varosha to the public; takes the view that this move undermines mutual trust and hence the prospect of a resumption of talks on a comprehensive solution to the Cyprus problem; expresses in this regard serious concern over the recent, new illegal activities in the fenced off area of Varosha for the opening of a new part of the beach; welcomes the proposals of the President of the Republic of Cyprus which aim at breaking the stalemate in the settlement process and calls for a more active engagement by the EU in this regard; calls on the Turkish Government to return to dialogue based on the UN format, which represents the only viable path towards reconciliation; urges that negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus be resumed under the auspices of the UN Secretary-General as soon as possible from where they left off at Crans- Montana in 2017; reiterates its call on Turkey to fulfil its obligation of full, non- discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement towards all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; regrets the fact that Turkey has still not made progress towards normalising its relations with the Republic of Cyprus; underlines the fact that cooperation remains essential in areas such as justice and home affairs as well as aviation law and air traffic communications with all EU Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; Remains deeply concerned about the restrictions faced by the enclaved Greek Cypriots in the free and unhindered exercise of their rights to education and freedom of religion; praises the important work of the bi-communal Committee on Missing Persons (CMP) and calls on the Turkish authorities to advance their efforts to provide the CMP proprio motu and without delay with all information at their disposal relating to burial sites and any other places where remains might be found, including information in military archives.
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 301 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Regrets that Türkiye’s position regarding the resolution of the Cyprus issue remains unchanged and that the Turkish support for a two state solution is not in line with the relevant UNSC resolutions. Further regrets that Türkiye pursues illegal activities in the maritime zones of Cyprus, has failed to implement in a non discriminatory manner the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement and continues the policy of “faits accomplis”, especially in the fenced area of Varosha.
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 303 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Deplores Türkiye’s ongoing campaign for the international upgrading of the illegal secessionist entity of the occupied part of Cyprus, mainly in international organizations such as the Organization of Turkic States and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, but also on a bilateral level, in blatant violation of the relevant UN Security Council Resolutions 541/1983 and 550/1984 and in spite of strong condemnation by the EU and others.
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 308 #
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 309 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 d (new)
13d. Notes that no significant progress was registered with regard to the protection of the rights of non-Muslim minorities and expects Turkish authorities to respect and protect the property and educational rights of minorities, and recognize the legal personality and the public use of the ecclesiastical title of the Ecumenical Patriarchate; Furthermore, urges Turkey to allow the re-opening of the Halki Seminary, respect the historical and cultural character of monuments, especially those classified as UNESCO World Heritage, apply the relevant to the religious communities and minorities recommendations of the Venice Commission and implement all relevant rulings of the European Court of Human Rights and resolutions of the CoE, including on the Greek Orthodox population of the islands Gökçeada (Imvros) and Bozcaada (Tenedos);
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 314 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 e (new)
13e. Reminds Türkiye that Hagia Sophia is a symbol of the ecumenical Christian Orthodox tradition and the Byzantine spirit, a monument globally renowned for its unparalleled historic cultural and architectural significance, inscribed since 1985 in the World Heritage List of UNESCO;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 315 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 f (new)
13f. Underlines that the decisions to turn Hagia Sophia and the Church of Holy Saviour of Chora into mosques, in July 2020 and August 2020 respectively, constitute serious challenges to the inter- faith and inter-cultural dialogue in the region, while degrading the Christian heritage in the country;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 317 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 g (new)
13g. Reminds that the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, by its decision adopted during its 44th Session in July 2021, has expressed great concern about the potential impact of status change on the Οutstanding Universal Value of Hagia Sophia and the Chora Museum and has called on Türkiye to engage in international cooperation and dialogue before any further major changes are implemented at the property;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 318 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 h (new)
13h. Regrets that no steps have been taken to open the Halki (Heybeliada) Greek Orthodox Seminary, which remains closed since 1971;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 319 #

2022/2205(INI)

13i. Calls on Türkiye to fully implement the recommendations of the Council of Europe on protecting minority property rights and education rights, especially by taking steps to revise the relevant legislation on the issue of property rights of non-Muslim minorities and legislation covering all issues of property rights;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 320 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 j (new)
13j. Reminds that past discriminatory policies implemented by Türkiye brought the Greek Minority to the verge of extinction;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 321 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 k (new)
13k. Condemns the fact that hate speech and hate crime against minorities in Türkiye continues and calls for the investigation of acts of vandalism and destruction on minority worship places and cemeteries;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 322 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 l (new)
13l. Notes that minorities continued to face difficulties in many areas, such as the lack of legal status for religious institutions, the absence of protection for languages, the lack of schooling support, and clergy training, the decrease of the number of media programs in minority languages, as well as obstacles in enjoying property rights for foundations; further notes that the lack of legal personality for minority communities’ churches, synagogues, patriarchates, monasteries, and chief rabbinates is an impediment to their freedom of association and religion and to enjoying their property rights;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 323 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 m (new)
13m. Deplores that no steps were taken to revise school textbooks, in order to remove discriminatory references, including against non-Muslim minorities;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 324 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 n (new)
13n. Calls on Türkiye to fully respect language, religion, culture, cultural heritage and fundamental rights of minorities in accordance with European standards, to put in place mechanisms that will support the participation of minorities in decision-making processes and ensure that they are duly represented in the public administration; further calls on Türkiye to continue the reform process and introduce legislation, which makes it possible for all non-Muslim religious communities to acquire legal personality as underlined by the Venice Commission in 2010;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 325 #
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 326 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 o (new)
13o. Calls on Türkiye to unequivocally commit to good neighbourly relations, international agreements and the peaceful settlement of disputes having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice and to avoid threats and actions that damage good neighbourly relations. Calls also on Türkiye to respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States as well as their sovereign rights to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with international law, including the Law of the Sea, and in particular, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS);
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 327 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 p (new)
13p. Expresses its concern that Türkiye even contested the sovereignty of Greece, over specific Greek islands of the Eastern Aegean Sea, on the unfounded basis of an alleged obligation for their demilitarization;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 328 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 q (new)
13q. Expresses deep concern that Türkiye continues to uphold a formal threat of war against Greece (casus belli), should the latter exercise its lawful right to extend its territorial waters up to 12 nautical miles in the Aegean Sea, in accordance with Article 3 of UNCLOS, which also reflects customary international law; emphasizes that such a threat is in stark violation of the UN Charter, which explicitly prohibits the threat or use of force and undermines regional peace and stability;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 329 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 r (new)
13r. Condemns the Turkish persistence on a two-state solution regarding the Cyprus issue contrary to the UN framework; recalls that the resumption of negotiations for a mutually acceptable bizonal-bicommunal federal settlement, as called for by the relevant and binding for all states UNSC Resolutions, is the only viable way forward;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 330 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 s (new)
13s. Strongly condemns the instrumentalisation of migrants by Türkiye for its own political purposes and expresses concern regarding efforts by Türkiye to place under its control yet another migration route in the Central Mediterranean;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 331 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 t (new)
13t. Requests Türkiye to honour and comply with its commitments under the EU-Turkey Joint Statement of 2016 and the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States, including the resumption of the readmission of returnees from Greece and to refrain from instrumentalizing migrants for political purposes; further requests Türkiye to uphold its obligation to take necessary measures to dismantle smuggling networks operating on its territory and to prevent the creation of new sea or land routes for illegal migration from Türkiye to the EU;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 332 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 u (new)
13u. Condemns Türkiye’s refusal to implement Articles 4 and 6 of the EU- Turkey Readmission Agreement for the readmission of third-country nationals, in disrespect of its obligations vis-à-vis the EU. Deplores that Türkiye links the implementation of these articles to visa liberalization, when full implementation of the readmission Agreement is one of the prerequisites for visa liberalization and recalls that the visa liberalization process, the upgrading of the Customs Union and the accession process have their own benchmarks and requirements, according to the EU institutional and legal framework;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 333 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 v (new)
13v. Regrets that Türkiye’s positions and policy vis-a-vis Libya have remained vastly unchanged and condemns the signature of the two memoranda of understanding between Türkiye and Libya on comprehensive security and military cooperation and on the delimitation of maritime zones; condemns furthermore, the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding on the delimitation of maritime jurisdiction areas between Türkiye and the National Accord Government of Libya (November 2019), which ignores Greece’s sovereign rights in the area concerned, infringes upon the sovereign rights of third States, does not comply with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third States;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 334 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 w (new)
13w. Notes with concern that Türkiye signed, in October 2022, a new MoU on hydrocarbons with the Libyan Government of National Unity, which could have serious consequences for regional stability, to the extent that it would entail a direct or indirect implementation of the 2019 MoU, in areas where Greece and other third countries have sovereign rights in accordance with the international Law of the Sea;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 347 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates its firm conviction that Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance in political, economic and foreign policy terms, a key partneactor for the stability of the wider region and a vital ally, including within NATO, and reaffirms that the EU is committed to pursuing the best possible relations with Türkiye based on dialogue, respect and mutual trust;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 348 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates its firm conviction that Türkiye is a country of strategic relevance in political, economic and foreign policy terms, a keyn important partner for the stabilecurity of the wider region and a vitalsignificant ally, including within NATO, and reaffirms that the EU is committed to pursuing the best possible relations with Türkiye based on dialogue, respect and mutual trust;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 359 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers, in view of all the above, that in the absence of a drastic change of course by the Turkish Government, Türkiye’s EU accession process has lost its purpose and will not endure much longer in the current circumstances; recommends, in that case, starting a reflection process to find an alternative and realisticaffirms nevertheless its support for keeping the accession process and its value-based approach as the main framework for EU-Türkiye Turkey relations in substitution for the accession process; calls on the Commission, therefore, to explore possible formats for a mutually appealing framework through a comprehensive and inclusive process, as it is still the most powerful tool to exercise normative pressure on and constructive dialogue with the Government of Turkey and the best framework to sustain the democratic and pro-European aspirations of Turkish society and promote convergence with the EU;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 362 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Considers, in view of all the above, that and, in the absence of a drastic change of course by the Turkish Government, Türkiye’s EU accession process has lost its purpose and will not endure much longer in the current circumstances; recommends, in that case, starting a reflection process to find an alternative and realistic framework for EU-Türkiye relations in substitution for the accession process; calls on the Commission, therefore, to explore possible formats for a mutually appealing framework through a comprehensive and inclusive procesfrom Türkiye, that a strategic discussion should be initiated within the European Council regarding the future of EU - Türkiye relations;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 367 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Reaffirms that the EU's policy towards Türkiye is based on a dual approach, which favours open channels of communication and cooperation with Ankara (positive agenda/High Level Dialogues) in areas of common interest, in a gradual, proportionate and reversible manner and provided that Türkiye sustains de-escalation, as well as appropriate negative measures in case Türkiye persists in its provocative, revisionist and illegal actions.
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 373 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Insists that democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights should remainas well as respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity and sovereign rights lie at the heart of good neighbourly relations between the EU and Türkiye and that any framework for those relations should be firmly underpinned by the principles of international law and multilateralism;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 392 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Reaffirms its support for an upgraded customs union with a broader, mutually beneficial scope, which could encompass a wide range of areas of common interest, including digitalisation and Green Deal alignment; insists that such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and the aforementioned principlesfundamental freedoms, respect for international law and good neighbourly relations, and that it can only be envisaged upon Turkey’s full implementation of the Additional Protocol to extend the Ankara Agreement towards all Member States without reserve and in a non-discriminatory fashion; stresses that both parties must be fully aware of this democratic conditionality from the outset of any negotiations, as Parliament will not give its consent to the final agreement if no progress is made in this field; remains ready to advance towards visa liberalisation as soon as the Turkish authorities fulfil the six outstanding benchmarks;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 393 #

2022/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Regrets the continued violation by Türkiye of the rules of the Customs Union and invites the European Council to look into the matter; reaffirms its support for an upgraded customs union with a broader, mutually beneficial scope, which could encompass a wide range of areas of common interest, including digitalisation and Green Deal alignment; insists that such a modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and the aforementioned principles; stresses that both parties must be fully aware of this democratic conditionality from the outset of any negotiations, as Parliament will not give its consent to the final agreement if no progress is made in this field; remains ready to advance towards visa liberalisation as soon as the Turkish authorities fulfil the six outstanding benchmarks;
2023/06/26
Committee: AFET
Amendment 241 #

2022/2203(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Notes North Macedonia’s commitment to positive diplomacy and good neighbourly relations; reiterates its full support for a consistent mutualand bona fide implementation of the Treaty of Friendship with Bulgaria and the Prespa Agreement with Greece;
2023/04/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 145 #

2022/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Notes the legal steps taken to eliminate discrimination against minorities, and calls for practical steps in order to ensure their inclusion, namely the inclusion of LGBTI+, Roma and Egyptian minorities; recalls the need to combat gender-based violence, step up child protection, adopt and implement legislation on minority rights, in particular the remaining by-laws, still pending to pass, with emphasis on self-identification and the use of the mother language with the local authorities, strengthen property rights and conduct a population census; underlines the importance of removing barriers to the socioeconomic inclusion of persons with disabilities;
2023/04/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 197 #

2022/2199(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Welcomes that Albania continued dialogue to ensure neighbourly relations and regional cooperation, which remain essential elements of the enlargement process, as well as of the Stabilisation and Association Process.
2023/04/03
Committee: AFET
Amendment 114 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) Member States that participate in the common procurement of defence products under the Instrument should have a right to invite Ukraine and Moldova to participate in the action. To this end, the Member States should authorise a procurement agent to enter into an agreement for procuring additional quantities of the defence product. Such an agreement would benefit the EDTIB as those countries’ participation would provide better economies of scale and scope, higher demand and interoperability at the technical level, common training, cross-servicing and maintenance, which would provide a foundation for the later inclusion of their defence industries in the EDTIB. It would also strengthen the two countries’ defence capabilities in light of Russia’s aggression and threats. The possibility to participate on the invitation of the Member States in the procurement agreement should be open only to countries that do not contravene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States, including respect for the principle of good neighbourly relations. It should also be open to Georgia.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 149 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) Russia’s brutal and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine became a turning point for European security, and in particular for Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Finland that are bordering Russia and Ukraine or have their territorial waters or Exclusive Economic Zones adjacent to those of Ukraine. Those Member States have become the target of threatening rhetoric and hostile actions by Russia, supported by Belarus. Despite facing fundamental threats to their own security, they continue to support Ukraine in providing assistance, including military assistance, thus significantly depleting their own stockpiles. The Instrument should therefore provide incentives for the participation of those Member States by granting higher Union contribution to actions where at least two such Member States participate. In addition, such a higher Union contribution should also apply for actions in which Member States decide to authorise the procurement agent to procure additional quantities of the respective defence product for Ukraine and Moldova. Given that those countries are partially occupied by Russia or its proxies, and are the targets of Russia’s military intervention, further support for Ukraine and Moldova would substantially contribute to European security, while strengthening the EDTIB and fostering cooperation in defence procurement.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 222 #

2022/0219(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The agreement between the participating Member States and the procurement agent referred to in Article 8(2) of this Regulation may authorise the procurement agent to invite and enter into an agreement for procuring additional quantities of the defence product subject to the common procurement with Ukraine and Moldova whose territory is in immediate proximity or affected by the war on Ukrainian territory and whose territory is occupied by forces supported by the Russian Federation. Such additional procurement arrangements shall be without prejudice to the applicable provisions of Union law and any relevant international obligations of the participating Member States.
2023/02/13
Committee: AFETITRE
Amendment 152 #

2022/0000(INI)

Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) increase the EU’s strategic sovereignty in specific areas that are fundamental to its continued pre-eminence on the international stage, for example by achieving full security of energy supply, energy diversification and energy independence, prioritising the reduction of energy dependencies, ensuring supply chains are diversified and that there is reciprocity in trade exchanges and the tools to counteract economic coercion, and ensuring the Union has food and agricultural sovereignty;
2022/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
— having regard to the Council’s conclusions on Enlargement and Association and Stabilisation Process of 14 December 2021, the Statement of the Members of the European Council of 25 March 2021 on the Eastern Mediterranean, to the European Council’s conclusions of 24 June 2021 and 1 October 2020, and to all previous relevant Council and European Council conclusions,
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
— having regard to the UNESCO statement of 10 July 2020 on Hagia Sophia, Istanbul
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
— having regard to the relevant resolutions of the UN Security Council on Cyprus, including resolution 550(1984) of 11 May 1984 on secessionist actions in Cyprus and resolution 789(1992) of 25 November 1992 which consider attempts to settle any part of Varosha by people other than its inhabitants as inadmissible, and call for the transfer of that area to the administration of the United Nations urging all concerned in the Cyprus question to commit themselves to the confidence-building measures set out in the resolution,
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas Turkey has been linked to the EU by an association agreement since 1964 and whereas a customs union was established in 1995; whereas the European Council granted the status of candidate country to Turkey in December 1999 and whereas accession negotiations were opened in 2005; whereas as a candidate country and as an important partner of the EU, Turkey is expected to respect and uphold the Copenhagen criteria and to uphold the highest standards of democracy, respect of human rights and the rule of law, including compliance with the international conventions acceded to by the EU; whereas being a candidate country entails the need to pursue and maintain good neighbourly relations with the EU and its Member States indiscriminately;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas Turkey, besides being a candidate for EU accession, is a key partner in relation to the economy, trade and migration, as well as a strategic partneressential areas of joint interest, such as migration, public health, climate, counter – terrorism and regional issues;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, in the aftermath of recent tensions between the EU and Turkey, particularly in relation to the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean, the European Council offered to nurture a more positive dynamic in EU-Turkey relations by expressing readiness to engage with Turkey in a phased, proportionate and reversible manner in a number of areas of common interest, provided that the de-escalation of recent tensions between the EU and Turkey, particularly in relation to the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean, is sustained and that Turkey engages constructively and subject to the established conditionalities set out in previous European Council conclusions;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas being a candidate country presumes a willingness to progressively approach in all aspects the values, interests, standards and policies of the EU; whereas an analysis of the EU’s reports in recent years reveal that Turkey’s distance from the EU’s values and its normative framework is still considerable and is even growing in fundamental areas such as the rule of law and human rights as well as good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas over the past year, EU- Turkey relations have on average remained stable, as enhanced cooperation and dialogue on a number of issues have coexisted with regular conflictsthe Council reiterated that Turkey continues to move further away from the European Union, and that Turkey’s accession negotiations have effectively come to a standstill and no further chapters can be considered for opening or closing, while according to the Commission, the underlying facts leading to this assessment still hold; nonetheless, dialogue and cooperation with Turkey increased in 2021; whereas this report reflects this situation by welcoming positive developments and pointing to further potential in the relationship, while signalling remaining problems, in particular as regards the rule of law and fundamental rights and good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 110 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates its concern about the persistent distance between the EU and Turkey, despite it being a candidate country, in terms of values and standards, and the continuing lack of political will to carry out the necessary reforms to address, in particular, the serious concerns about the rule of law and fundamental rights that continue to negatively affect the accession process; notes that, in addition to this, unilateral actions in breach of international law in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Aegean Sea as well as strong and provocative statements against the EU and its Member States have deteriorated EU-Turkey relations; considers that without clear progress in thisese fields, Parliament cannot envisage any resumption of accession negotiations with Turkey, which have effectively been at a standstill since 2018;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes, however, that there has been a slight improvement over the past year in overall EU-Turkey relations, which have on average remained stable, as enhanced cooperation and dialogue on a number of issues have coexisted with regular conflicts that good neighbourly relations form an essential part of moving towards the EU; notes that bilateral relations remained challenging with neighbouring EU Member States, particularly Greece and Cyprus; notes that tensions in the Aegean Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean were not conducive to good neighbourly relations and undermined regional stability and security; expresses its hope that this pattern of ‘conflictual cooperation’ can be overcome and replaced with a more positive dynamic;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 154 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates its firm conviction that Turkey is a country of strategic relevance in political, economic and foreign policy terms, a partner that is key for the stability of the wider region,the European Union’s strategic interest in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and ain ally with which the EU wishes to pursue the best possible relationsthe development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Turkey; welcomes, in this view, the recent statements expressed at the highest level by the Turkish authorities about the recommitment of the Turkish Government to the EU path, but urges the Turkish authorities to put their words into action and demonstrate this commitment with specific facts and decisions;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Expresses concern over the current economic situation in Turkey, which through soaring inflation and a constantly rising cost of living is pushing a high and increasing number of people into hardship and poverty as reflected in the OECD 2021 Report on Turkey;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 256 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Takes note of the adoption of the fourth and fifth judicial packages in Turkey during 2021; asserts, however, that the current problems stem not only from problematic legislation, but are often caused by a failurelack of political will to implement existing adequate provisions; remains concerned about the erosion of the rule of law and judicial independence in Turkey;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 302 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Calls on the Turkish authorities to promote positive and effective reforms in the area of the freedom of thought, conscience and religion by enabling religious communities to obtain legal personality, and by applying Venice Commission recommendations on the status of religious communities, all relevant ECtHR rulings and Council of Europe resolutions, including on the Greek Orthodox population of the islands of Gokceada (Imbros) and Bozcaada (Tenedos); notes that following the decision to turn Hagia Sophia into a mosque in July 2020, another museum among the World Heritage Sites in Turkey was converted into a mosque; notes the recent developments with regard to the historical Panaghia Soumela Monastery, when images on social media depicted a foreign band dancing to disco music inside this monument, which is included in the UNESCO World Heritage Tentative list; notes that no steps were taken to open the Halki (Heybeliada) Greek Orthodox Seminary, closed since 1971; reiterates its call on Turkey to respect the importance of the Ecumenical Patriarchate for Orthodox Christians all over the world, to recognise its legal personality and the public use of the ecclesiastical title of the Ecumenical Patriarch; notes with concern that hate speech and hate crimes against Christians and Jews continued to be reported, Alevis faced hate crimes, and investigations in this regard remained ineffective
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 307 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Is concerned that full respect for and protection of language, religion, culture, cultural heritage and fundamental rights of minorities in accordance with European standards have yet to be achieved and calls upon Turkey to take action.
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 318 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes with great concernStrongly condemns the indictment refilled by Turkey’s Chief Public Prosecutor at the Constitutional Court seeking the dissolution of the HDP and a political ban on nearly 500 HDP members, including most of its current leadership, which would prevent them from conducting any kind of political activity in the next five years and that the HDP and its party organisations have been specifically and continuously targeted by the Turkish authorities, leading to a situation where over 4 000 HDP members are currently in prison; continues to strongly condemn the continued detention since November 2016 of Selahattin Demirtaş and Figen Yüksekdağ, the former co-chairs of the HDP;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 368 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Commends the efforts made by Turkey to continue hosting the largest refugee population in the world; welcomes, in this regard, the continued provision of EU funding for refugees and host communities in Turkey, and expresses its commitment to sustain this support in the future; calls on Turkey to ensure the full and non-discriminatory implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement of 2016, including vis a vis the Republic of Cyprus, as well as to resume the readmission of returnees from the Greek islands interrupted in March 2020, and Turkey’s obligation to take any necessary measures to prevent new sea or land routes for illegal migration opening from Turkey to the EU, and its will to cooperate with neighbouring states as well as the EU to this effect and with fundamental rights as part of its implementation process; Believes that strengthening trade relations could bring concrete benefits to citizens in Turkey and the EU therefore takes note of the Commission’s proposal to work on a mandate on the potential upgrading of the Customs Union provided that it is implemented vis-à-vis all Member States would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms and that it can only be envisaged following Turkey’s full implementation of the Additional Protocol to extend the Association Agreement towards all Member States without reserve and in a non-discriminatory fashion; stresses that both parties must be fully aware of this democratic conditionality from the very onset of any negotiations, as the Parliament will not give its consent to the final agreement without results on the aforementioned preconditions in this field; notes that visa liberalisation would constitute an important step towards facilitating people-to-people contacts and is of great importance for Turkish citizens, particularly for students, academics, business representatives and people with family ties in EU Member States; continues its support for the visa liberalisation process once the set conditions have been fully and effectively implemented and encourages the Turkish Government to fully comply with the 72 criteria identified in the visa liberalisation roadmap in a non-discriminatory manner towards all member-states; stresses that there has been very little real progress on the outstanding benchmarks still to be fulfilled by Turkey; notes that the new Action Plan on Human Rights foresees the acceleration of the fulfilment of the remaining benchmarks; stresses that the revision of Turkey’s anti-terrorism legislation and Data Protection Law are key conditions for ensuring fundamental rights and freedoms; regrets that as a result of Turkey’s instrumentalization of refugees a continuing increase in asylum applications was registered in Cyprus in 2021; notes that pending the full and effective implementation of the EU- Turkey Readmission Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States, existing bilateral readmission agreements and provisions in similar agreements and arrangements with EU Member States, should be adequately implemented; cooperation in the area of justice and home affairs with all EU Member States remains essential;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 370 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Commends the efforts made by Turkey to continue hosting the largest refugee population in the world; welcomes, in this regard, the continued provision of EU funding for refugees and host communities in Turkey, and expresses its commitment to sustain this support in the future; emphasises that the instrumentalisation of migrants and refugees cannot be accepted as a tool for political leverage and blackmail; notes that pending the full and effective implementation of the Joint EU – Turkey Statement of 2016 and the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States, existing bilateral readmission agreements and provisions in similar agreements and arrangements with Member States should be adequately implemented; effective border management, as well as the resumption of returns, continue to be priorities;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 407 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Acknowledges that Turkey can pursue its own foreign policy in line with its interests and goals, but expects this policy to be defended through diplomacy and dialogue based on international law and, as a candidate country, to be increasingly aligned with that of the EU; notes that Turkey’s CFSP alignment remained at very low levels and its increasingly assertive foreign policy continued to collide with the EU priorities under the CFSP, notably due to its support for military actions in the Caucasus, Syria, Libya and Iraq; notes that the EU has repeatedly stressed the need for Turkey to respect the sovereign rights of EU member states, which include entering into bilateral agreements and exploring and exploiting their natural resources in accordance with the EU acquis and international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; stresses that Turkey needs to commit itself unequivocally to good neighbourly relations, international agreements and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 438 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the decrease in tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean during the past year, but remains fully aware that these positive dynamics could be reversed at any moment while the underlying issues remain unresolved; condemns, in this regard, the continuous harassment and hindrance by Turkish warships of research vessels from performing surveys on the potential route of the East Med Pipeline, which is an energy project of EU Common Interest (PCI), within the EEZ/ continental shelf of Member States; calls on Turkey to respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States over their territorial sea and airspace as well as their sovereign rights, including inter alia the right to explore and exploit natural resources, in accordance with EU and international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which is part of the EU acquis; continues to urge Turkey to unequivocally commit to good neighborly relations, international agreements and to the peaceful settlement of disputes, having recourse, if necessary to the International Court of Justice and to refrain from any unilateral action or threats; supports, in this respect, the invitation by the Government of the Republic of Cyprus to Turkey to negotiate in good faith the maritime delimitation between their relevant coasts, or have recourse, to the International Court of Justice, and calls on Turkey to accept Cyprus’ invitation; reiterates its call on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the Akkuyu nuclear power plant, which will be located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, therefore posing a major threat not only to Turkey, but also to the Mediterranean region; requests, accordingly, that the Turkish Government join the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo Convention), which commits its parties to notifying and consulting each other about major projects under consideration that are likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact across borders; asks the Turkish Government, to this end, to involve or at least consult the governments of its neighbouring countries in relation to any further developments in the Akkuyu venture;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 448 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. WelcomNotes theat decrease in tensspite the initial indications towards a de-escalations in the Eastern Mediterranean during the past year, but remains fully aware that these positive dynamics could be reversed at any moment while the underlying issues remain unresolved tensions continued to remain high with Member States, in particular Greece and Cyprus;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 460 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. DeploRegrets the fact that the unresolved conflict in Cyprus is a major obstacle to EU-Cyprus problem remains unresolved and stresses that a solution in line with the relevant UNSC resolutions will have a positive impact on Turkey’s relations with the EU; reaffirms its view that the only sustainable solution to the Cyprus issue is that of a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality and political equality, as set out in relevant UN Security Council Resolutions and in accordance with international law and on the basis of respect for the principles on which the Union is founded and the acquis;; deeply regrets that Turkey has abandoned this UN frameworke agreed UN framework and its insistence to a two state solution in Cyprus and that it continues to violate UN Security Council resolutions, with unilateral, illegal and provocative actions including by the opening of the fenced off area of Varosha; notes that EU funding to Turkey will be subject to rules on conditionality, including for respecting the principles of the United Nations Charter, international law and European values and principles; praises the important work of the bi- communal Committee on Missing Persons (CMP) and calls on the Turkish authorities to advance their efforts to provide the CMP proprio motu and without delay with all information at their disposal relating to burial sites and any other places where remains might be found, including information in military archives;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 468 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Deplores the fact that the unresolved conflict in Cyprus isremains unresolved, constituting a major obstacle to EU-Turkey relations; reaffirms its view that the only sustainable solution to the Cyprus issue is that of a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement, including its external aspects, within the UN framework, on the basis of a bi- communal, bi-zonal federation with a single international legal personality and political equality, in accordance with international law and on the basis of respect for, with all relevant UNSC resolutions and in line with the principles on which the EUnion is founded and the acquis; deeply regrets that Turkey has abandoned this UN framework; the EU will continue to play an active role in supporting the process;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 477 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Strongly condemns Turkey’s unilateral actions in relation to Varosha that run contrary to the UN Security Council Resolutions and recalls the importance of the status of Varosha and the need for full respect of UN Security Council Resolutions, in particular Resolutions 550, 789 and 1251, as underlined by the 24 June 2021 European Council. The Council calls for the immediate reversal of these actions and the reversal of all steps taken on Varosha since October 2020;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 488 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24 b. Strongly condemns Turkey’s illegal activities in Greek and Cypriot waters, as well as its violations of the Greek national airspace, including overflights of inhabited areas, and its territorial sea, which violate both the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of an EU Member State and international law; expresses its full solidarity with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus; reaffirms the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements on its exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and explore and exploit its natural resources in full compliance with relevant international law; expresses its grave concern about the illegal Turkish fishing activities within Greek territorial waters in the Aegean Sea and the unregulated and unreported fishing activities of Turkish fishing fleets in international waters in the Aegean Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean; calls on all sides for a genuine collective engagement to negotiate the delimitation of EEZs and the continental shelf in good faith, fully respecting international law and the principle of good relations between neighbours; notes with regret that the casus belli declared by the TGNA against Greece in 1995 has not been withdrawn yet; welcomes the continuation of exploratory talks between Greece and Turkey, which seek to address, the delimitation of the continental shelf and the EEZ in line with international law; reiterates its call on the Turkish Government to sign and ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which is part of the European Union acquis; notes that the Council’s conclusions of 15 July 2019, in the light of Turkey’s continued and new illegal drilling activities, not to hold the Association Council and further meetings of the EU-Turkey high-level dialogues for the time being remain valid, urges Turkey to unequivocally commit to good neighbourly relations, international agreements and to the peaceful settlement of disputes, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice; Turkey must stop all threats and actions that damage good neighbourly relations, normalise its relations with the Republic of Cyprus and respect the sovereignty of all EU Member States over their territorial sea and airspace as well as all their sovereign rights, including inter alia the right to explore and exploit natural resources, in accordance with EU and international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS);
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 498 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 c (new)
24 c. Strongly condemns the Turkish military interventions in Syria, which constitute grave violations of international law and risk undermining the stability and security of the region as a whole; calls on the Government of Turkey to end its illegal occupation of northern Syria and Afrin and to withdraw its military and paramilitary proxy forces; reiterates that security concerns cannot justify unilateral military action in a foreign country; recalls its position, as expressed in previous resolutions, on the introduction of an initiative in the Council for all EU Member States to halt the licencing of arms exports to Turkey in accordance with Council Common Position2008/944/CFSP;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 505 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 d (new)
24 d. Notes that the persistent foreign interference in Libya continued to challenge seriously the implementation of the UN-led Berlin process; Turkey claimed that the UN embargo provisions, the articles on withdrawal of foreign elements and the suspension of military training in the cease-fire agreement are not applicable to the legitimate government; on a regular basis, the Turkish Ministry of Defence issued statements on ongoing training with Libyan forces and the legitimate presence of Turkish military forces; the presence of mercenary forces was a complicating factor; Turkey maintained its unjustified opinion that Operation IRINI is not balanced and that it disproportionally targets the Government of National Accord. Turkey continued to assert the validity of the Turkish-Libyan maritime delimitation and military agreements of 2019 which the EU considers an infringement upon the sovereign rights of third States, not complying with the Law of the Sea and having no legal consequences for third States; the EU listed a Turkish shipping company in the framework of violations of the Libya weapons embargo;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 510 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 e (new)
24 e. Recalls the need for Turkey to address obligations as regards the implementation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union, ensuring its effective application to all Member States. regrets Turkey’s continued deviations from its obligations under the EU-Turkey Customs Union, and recalls that trade barriers or equivalent that are not in conformity with it should be removed without delay; recalls, in this sense, that the current customs union will not achieve its full potential until Turkey fully implements the Additional Protocol to extend the Ankara Agreement towards all Member States without reserve and in anon-discriminatory fashion in relation to all Member States, and until all existing trade irritants are resolved; stresses that a modernisation of the Customs Union would be beneficial for both parties and would keep Turkey economically and normatively anchored to the EU; reiterates that this modernisation would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms as prescribed by the Copenhagen criteria on good neighbourly relations with the EU and all its Member States and on its non-discriminatory implementation;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 512 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 f (new)
24 f. Continues its support for the visa liberalization process once the set conditions have been met; points out that visa liberalization would constitute an important step towards facilitating people- to-people contacts and notes that it is of great importance, particularly for students, academics, business representatives and people with family ties in EU Member States, but stresses that there has been very little real progress on the six outstanding benchmarks still to be fulfilled by Turkey; asks the Government of Turkey to fully comply with these benchmarks in a non-discriminatory manner, including with regard to all EU Member States;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 519 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Insists that democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights should remain at the heart of EU-Turkey relations under any framework; reaffirms its support for keeping the accession process and its value-based approach as the main framework for EU-Turkey relations, as it is still the most powerful tool to exercise normative pressure and sustain the democratic and pro-European aspirations of Turkish society; nevertheless remains open to the possibility of both sides reviewing, in a realistic manner, the appropriateness of this framework and its ability to function, or, if necessary, exploring other possible models for future relations;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 529 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Insists that democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights should remain at the heart of EU-Turkey relations under any framework; reaffirms its support for keeping the accession process and its value-based approach as the main framework for EU-Turkey relations, alongside the principles of international law and multilateralism, as it is still the most powerful tool to exercise normative pressure and sustain the democratic and pro-European aspirations of Turkish society; nevertheless remains open to the possibility of both sides reviewing, in a realistic manner, the appropriateness of this framework and its ability to function, or, if necessary, exploring other possible models for future relations;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 545 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Notes that the current state of ‘conflictual cooperation’ in EU-Turkey relations is prone to producing unsatisfactory results; calls for a rebalancing of the relationship by building on the solid grounds for cooperation driven by mutual interests, and also by building confidence to address the lack of trust; believes that an orderly dispute settlement mechanism may be beneficial in such an overall framework and calls on the Commission to explore the creation of such a mechanism in accordance with obligations under the Negotiating Framework;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 547 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Notes that the varying priorities of the EU institutions set out in the existing frameworks governing EU-Turkey relations make it very difficult to find an effective way to move forward; deplores the lack of a long-term strategy, a coherent policy and consistent leadership towards Turkey in the EU and among all its institutions;deleted
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 557 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Believes that the EU should continue to pursue all possible instances of dialogue, common understanding and convergence of positions with Turkey; invites Turkey to engage in constructive and bona fide dialogue –including on issues of foreign policy where Turkey and the EU have been on opposing terms- with a view to once again finding common ground and a common understanding with the EU, restarting dialogue and cooperation on good neighbourly relations, and relaunching the process of reforms in Turkey; reiterates that, failing that, and in the event of renewed unilateral actions or provocations in breach of international law, the EU should use all the instruments and the options at its disposal, including targeted sanctions as a last resort, which should not have an adverse impact on the Turkish people, civil society or refugees in Turkey;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 559 #

2021/2250(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 b (new)
27 b. Considers that, as a necessary step in order to improve the overall state of relations, both sides need to use respectful language, make efforts to fight existing prejudices and misconceptions, and allow for a more objective and complete consideration of the other side’s image in the respective public opinion, reversing the mutually deteriorating perceptions; calls on this view on the Commission to launch a communication policy towards Turkish society aimed at raising awareness about the EU; stresses that a belligerent, revisionist and aggressive rhetoric only reinforces extreme positions on both sides and that a purely confrontational approach plays into the hands of those who are aiming to pull Turkey and the EU apart;
2022/03/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 65 #

2021/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Underscores that the pace of EU accession is determined by the progress on the due functioning of all institutions and is grounded in the rule of law, good governance and fundamental rights; urges Albania to sustain and intensify efforts to reinforce the functioning of the judiciary, strengthen the rule of law and human rights, including the protection of persons belonging to minorities, counter corruption and organised crime, and ensure media freedom;
2022/03/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2021/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Encourages the government to accelerate administrative preparations for the upcoming accession negotiations and to make the best possible use of assistance and transfer of know-how provided by EU Member States in this regard; stresses the importance of having in place coherent government structures to effectively coordinate EU integration matters; underlines the need to improve intra- service coordination, evaluation and monitoring of EU-related reforms, to advance decentralisation, country-wide modernisation and depoliticisation of the civil service and to enable conditions to conduct the upcoming population census;
2022/03/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 97 #

2021/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the adoption to the Population Census Law and looks forward to the smooth conduct of the upcoming Population Census in full transparency and in line with international standards..
2022/03/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 141 #

2021/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes advances in ensuring equal opportunities and calls for further improvements in the enforcement of gender equality, property rights, data protection, and rights of people with disabilities and minority rights;
2022/03/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 147 #

2021/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Urges Albania to swiftly adopt and implement the remaining by-laws, related to the 2017 Framework Law on the protection of national minorities, in line with European standards and with the involvement of all relevant stakeholders.
2022/03/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #

2021/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Calls on Albania to continue the ongoing efforts to implement a comprehensive land sector reform and to consolidate property rights, in transparent manner by holding consultations with all relevant stakeholders, including by addressing cases of falsification of documents and swiftly advancing the process for registration and compensation.
2022/03/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 224 #

2021/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 f (new)
29f. Recalls the urgency of the fight against drug trafficking networks in Albania, which are gaining increased international access.
2022/03/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 276 #

2021/2244(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. WelcomEncourages the Albanian Government’s to continued steps promoting good neighbourly relations, ands well as enhancing inclusive regional integration by developing a Regional Economic Area;
2022/03/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #

2021/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 a (new)
— having regard to the European Council Conclusions of 12 December 2019,
2022/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 127 #

2021/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
L a. whereas the Turkey-Libya Memorandum of Understanding on the delimitation on maritime jurisdictions in the Mediterranean Sea infringes upon the sovereign rights of Third States does not comply with Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for Third States;
2022/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 293 #

2021/2064(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
(o a) urge the Libyan authorities to proceed to the cancelation of the Turkey - Libya Memorandum of Understanding on the delimitation on maritime jurisdictions in the Mediterranean Sea;
2022/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
— having regard to the amending budget No 5/2020 of the European Union for the financial year 2020, on the mobilization of the Contingency Margin in 2020 to provide continued humanitarian support to refugees in Turkey, as set out in document 8857/2020,
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 18 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas in June 2020, the Amending Budget (DAB) No 5 for the year 2020 was adopted by the Council, in order to continue providing support to refugees and host communities in response to the Syria crisis; Under the MFF Heading 4, Global Europe, EUR 100 million in commitment and payment appropriations will be provided as resilience support to refugees and host communities in Jordan and Lebanon whereas EUR 485 million in commitment appropriations and EUR 68 million in payment appropriations will be provided to ensure the continuation of the urgent humanitarian support to refugees in Turkey;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 54 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the Turkey Facility is made up of two tranches of EUR 3 billion each; regrets the fact that, unlike in the first tranche 2016-2017, where the EU budget contributed EUR 1 billion and Member States EUR 2 billion, in the second tranche 2018-2019 the ratio of contributions was reversed, to the detriment of existing Union projects;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 122 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the fact that the EUTF for Africa has contributed to the triple humanitarian-development-peace nexus approach, which was not possible with the EU financial instruments under the previous MFF;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 188 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates its request that Turkey respect the principle of non-refoulement, in particular on the Syrian border, and that it not use the flows of refugees against the EUdoes not instrumentalize the migratory flows against the EU, for political purposes, and that it abides fully by the EU-Turkey statement especially with regard to the effective prevention of flows, dismantle of smuggling networks, control of its borders and acceptance of returns, in a non- discriminatory manner;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 212 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Welcomes the Council’s extended invitation to the Commission to present a proposal to the Council for the continuation of financing for Syrian refugees in Turkey, as well as in Jordan, Lebanon and other parts of the region;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 250 #

2020/2045(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Expects the Commission to fully make use of the possibilities afforded by the programme-based approach under the geographic pillar of the NDICI-Global Europe and IPA III, complemented by global thematic programming, rapid response funding and the large unprogrammed reserve under the NDICI- Global Europe;
2021/05/05
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 38 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) A fixed and unanimously accepted by the Member States long-term objective is crucial to contribute to economic and societal transformation, jobs, growth, and the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, as well as to move in a fair and cost-effective manner towards the temperature goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change following the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the ‘Paris Agreement’).
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) Achieving climate neutrality should require a contribution from all economic sectors, proportional long-term commitment by the EU budget and should be adapted to sectoral and regional specificities in order to make the transition economically viable, just and socially fair. In light of the importance of energy production and consumption on greenhouse gas emissions, the transition to a sustainable, affordable and secure energy system relying on a well-functioning internal energy market is essential. The digital transformation, technological innovation, and research and development are also important drivers for achieving the climate-neutrality objective.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 104 #

2020/0036(COD)

(15) In taking the relevant measures at Union and national level to achieve the climate-neutrality objective, Member States and the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should take into account the contribution of the transition to climate neutrality to the well- being of citizens, the prosperity of society and the competitiveness of the economy; energy and food security and affordability; fairness and solidarity across and within Member States considering their economic capability, national circumstances and the need for convergence over time; the need to make the transition just and socially fair; best available scientific evidence, in particular the findings reported by the IPCC; the need to integrate climate change related risks into investment and planning decisions; cost-effectiveness and technological neutrality in achieving greenhouse gas emissions reductions and removals and increasing resilience; progression over time in environmental integrity and level of ambition; different regions need an individual pace towards achieving climate neutrality, which can only be set after comprehensive impact assessment taking into account the effect on regional development, industry and employment.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 116 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The transition to climate neutrality requires changes across the entire policy spectrum, ambitious and sustained financing and a collective effort of all sectors of the economy and society, as illustrated by the Commission in its Communication ‘The European Green Deal’. The European Council, in its Conclusions of 12 December 2019, stated that all relevant Union legislation and policies need to be consistent with, and contribute to, the fulfilment of the climate- neutrality objective while respecting a level playing field, and invited the Commission to examine whether this requires an adjustment of the existing rules.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 124 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The Commission, in its Communication ‘The European Green Deal’, announced its intention to assess and make proposals for increasing the Union’s greenhouse gas emission reduction target for 2030 to ensure its consistency with the climate-neutrality objective for 2050. In that Communication, the Commission underlined that all Union policies should contribute to the climate-neutrality objective and that all sectors should play their part. By September 20201, the Commission should, based on a comprehensive impact assessment and taking into account its analysis of the integrated national energy and climate plans submitted to the Commission in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 , reviewpropose a revision of the Union’s 2030 target for climate and, explore options for a new 2030 target of 50up to 55 % emission reductions compared with 1990 levels and propose commensurate funding through the EU budget to achieve the possible new target. Where it considers necessary to amend the Union’s 2030 target, it should make proposals to the European Parliament and to the Council to amend this Regulation as appropriate. In addition, the Commission should, by 30 June 2021, assess how the Union legislation implementing that target would need to be amended in order to achieve emission reductions of 50up to 55 % compared to 1990. _________________ 36Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 128 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The Commission, in its Communication ‘The European Green Deal’, announced its intention to assess and make proposals for increasing the Union’s greenhouse gas emission reduction target for 2030 to ensure its consistency with the climate-neutrality objective for 2050. In that Communication, the Commission underlined that all Union policies should contribute to the climate-neutrality objective and that all sectors should play their part. By September 2020, the Commission should, based on a comprehensive impact assessment and taking into account its analysis of the integrated national energy and climate plans submitted to the Commission in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 , review the Union’s 2030 target for climate and explore options for a new 2030 target of 50up to 55 % emission reductions compared with 1990 levels. Where it considers necessary to amend the Union’s 2030 target, it should make proposals to the European Parliament and to the Council to amend this Regulation as appropriate. In addition, the Commission should, by 30 June 2021, assess how the Union legislation implementing that target would need to be amended in order to achieve emission reductions of 50up to 55 % compared to 1990. _________________ 36Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 133 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) To ensure the Union and the Member States remain on track to achieve the climate-neutrality objective and progress on adaptation, the Commission should regularly assess progress. Should the collective progress made by Member States towards the achievement of the climate-neutrality objective or on adaptation be insufficient or Union measures inconsistent with the climate- neutrality objective or inadequate to enhance adaptive capacity, strengthen resilience or reduce vulnerability, the Commission should take the necessary measures in accordance with the Treaties. The Commission should also regularly assess relevant national measures, and issue recommendations where it finds that Union measures have led to loss of regional competitiveness and jobs in sectors of the economy or that a Member State’s measures are inconsistent with the climate-neutrality objective or inadequate to enhance adaptive capacity, strengthen resilience and reduce vulnerability to climate change.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 136 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The Commission should ensure a robust and objective assessment based on the most up to date scientific, technical and socio-economic findings, and representative of a broad range of independent expertise, and base its assessment on relevant information including information submitted and reported by Member States, reports of the European Environment Agency, best available scientific evidence, including the reports of the IPCC and a comprehensive socio-economic and sectoral impact assessment of any proposed new target. Given that the Commission has committed to exploring how the EU taxonomy can be used in the context of the European Green Deal by the public sector, this should include information on environmentally sustainable investment, by the Union and Member States, consistent with Regulation (EU) 2020/… [Taxonomy Regulation] when such information becomes available. The Commission should use European statistics and data where available and seek expert scrutiny. The European Environment Agency should assist the Commission, as appropriate and in accordance with its annual work programme.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 151 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In order to provide predictability and confidence for all economic actors, including businesses, workers, investors and consumers, to ensure that the transition towards climate neutrality is well adjusted to the socio-economic realities in all regions and irreversible, to ensure gradual reduction over time and to assist in the assessment of the consistency of measures and progress with the climate- neutrality objective, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to set out a trajectory for achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the Union by 2050Commission should carry a comprehensive socio-economic and sectoral impact assessment. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making37 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 37 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 158 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) Climate change is by definition a trans-boundary challenge and a coordinated action at Union level is needed to effectively supplemenort and reinforce national and regional policies. Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely to achieve climate neutrality in the Union by 2050, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone, but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives,
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 163 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
This Regulation sets out a binding objective of climate neutrality in the Union by 2050, adopted unanimously by the Member States, in pursuit of the long-term temperature goal set out in Article 2 of the Paris Agreement, and provides a framework for achieving progress in pursuit of the global adaptation goal established in Article 7 of the Paris Agreement.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 179 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. TUpon agreement, the relevant Union institutions and the Member States shall take the necessary measures at Union and national level respectively, to enable the collective achievement of the climate- neutrality objective set out in paragraph 1, after taking into account the social, economic and territorial context as well the importance of promoting fairness and solidarity among Member States.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 185 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. By September 20201 and after conducting socio-economic and sectoral impact assessment, the Commission shall reviewpropose a revision of the Union’s 2030 target for climate referred to in Article 2(11) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 in light of the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1), and explore options for a new 2030 target of 50up to 55% emission reductions compared to 1990 and propose commensurate funding through the EU budget to achieve the possible new target. Where the Commission considers that it is necessary to amend that target, it shall make proposals to the European Parliament and to the Council as appropriate.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 202 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 4
4. By 30 June 20212, the Commission shall assess how the Union legislation implementing the Union’s 2030 target would need to be amended in order to enablpropose the achievement of 50up to 55 % emission reductions compared to 1990 and to achieve the climate-neutrality-objective set out in Article 2(1), and consider taking the necessary measures, including the adoption of legislative proposals, in accordance with the Treaties.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 220 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. When settproposing a trajectory in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission shall consider the following:
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 230 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) ongoing and projected economic downturns due to symmetric or asymmetric shocks resulting in loss of jobs and regional decline;
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 262 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point j
(j) the best available and most recent scientific evidence, including the latest reports of the IPCC and a comprehensive socio-economic and sectoral impact assessment.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 277 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall develop and implement adaptation strategies and plans that include comprehensive risk management frameworks, based on robust climate and vulnerability baselines and progress assessments, taking into consideration regional specificities and the need for differentiated pace.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 280 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
By 30 September 20234, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall assess, together with the assessment foreseen under Article 29(5) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999:
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 293 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the adequacy of Union measures and funding to ensure progress on adaptation as referred to in Article 4.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 296 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Where, based on the assessment referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission finds that Union measures are inconsistent with the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1) or inadequate to ensure progress on adaptation as referred to in Article 4, or that the progress towards either the climate-neutrality objective or on adaptation as referred to in Article 4 is insufficient, or that Union measures have led to loss of competitiveness and jobs in specific regions, it shall take the necessary measures in accordance with the Treaties, at the same time as the review of the trajectory referred to in Article 3(1).
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 302 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
By 30 September 20234, and every 5 years, thereafter the Commission shall assess:
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 306 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the adequacy of relevant national measures to ensure progress on adaptation as referred to in Article 4 and the various external to the Member States factors that influence the progress, including a state of force majeure.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 309 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Commission finds, under due consideration of the collective progress assessed in accordance with Article 5(1), that a Member State’s measures are inconsistent with that objective as expressed by the trajectory referred to in Article 3(1) or inadequate to ensure progress on adaptation as referred to in Article 4, or that Union measures have led to loss of competitiveness and jobs in specific regions, it may issue recommendations to that Member State. The Commission shall make such recommendations publicly available.
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 313 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the Member State concerned shall take due account of the recommendation in a spirit of solidarity between Member States and the Union and between Member States, unless the latter have duly-justified objections to the draft recommendation;
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 323 #

2020/0036(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) best available scientific evidence, including the latest reports of the IPCC; and a comprehensive socio-economic and sectoral impact assessment; and
2020/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) The resources from the JTF should complement the resources available under cohesion policy. The establishment of the JTF should not lead to cuts to, or transfers from, the funds covered by Regulation (EU) .../... [new CPR].
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 95 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12 a) Inclusive policies and strategies are necessary to avoid exacerbating inequalities in a just transition process. The promotion of social cohesion should be a guiding principle for support under the JTF, promoting gender equality, ensuring vibrant rural areas, improved conditions for migrants, seasonal workers, young and older workers and low-skilled workers and ensuring no one is left behind.
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 160 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) investments in the deployment of technology and infrastructures for affordable clean energy, in greenhouse gas emission reduction, including the deployment of environmentally-friendly means of transportation, energy efficiency and renewable energy;
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 168 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) investments in digitalisation and digital connectivity, in particular for the roll-out of broadband in rural and remote areas, digital and precision farming;
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 182 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) investments in regeneration and decontamination of sites, land restoration and repurposing projects; while ensuring appropriate respect for the "polluter pays" principle
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 193 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point h
(h) upskilling and reskilling of workers and jobseekers;
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 225 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) undertakings in difficulty, as defined in Article 2(18) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/201416 ; _________________ 16Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).deleted
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 227 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) investment related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels;deleted
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 232 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) investment in broadband infrastructure in areas in which there are at least two broadband networks of equivalent category.deleted
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 242 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The JTF priority or priorities shall comprise the JTF resources consisting of all or part of the JTF allocation for the Member States and the resources transferred in accordance with Article [21a] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR]. The total of the ERDF and ESF+ resources transferred to the JTF priority shall be at least equal to one and a half times the amount of support from the JTF to that priority but shall not exceed three times that amount.
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 268 #

2020/0006(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Where the Commission concludes, based on the examination of the final performance report of the programme, that there is a failure to achieve at least 65% of the target established for one or more output or result indicators for the JTF resources, it may make financial corrections pursuant to Article [98] of Regulation (EU) [new CPR] by reducing the support from the JTF to the priority concerned in proportion to the achievementsBased on the final performance report of the programme, the Commission may make financial corrections in accordance with Regulation (EU) [new CPR].
2020/05/06
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 5 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 2
— having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, particularly to Articles 3, 15, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26 and 2647 thereof,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 25 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 5
— having regard to the Concluding Observations of the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD Committee) of 2 October 2015 on the initial report of the European Union, including those on the European Union institutions’ compliance with the Convention as public administration,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 28 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the General Comments of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, as the authoritative guidance on the implementation of the UN CRPD,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 42 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 20 a (new)
- having regard to the exploratory opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee requested by the European Parliament on the situation of disabled women,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 47 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 21 a (new)
- having regard to the study of the European Parliament Policy Department C of 2016 on European Structural and Investent Funds and people with disabilities in the European Union,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 48 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 22
— having regard to the Annual Report 2018 of the European Ombudsman, and specifically her strategic inquiries into how the European Commission ensures that disabled people can access its websites (OI/6/2017/EA), how the European Commission treats disabled people under the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme for EU staff (OI/4/2016/EA), and the Decision in the joint inquiry in cases 1337/2017/EA and 1338/2017/EA on the accessibility for visually impaired candidates of selection procedures to recruit EU civil servants, organised by the European Personnel Selection Office,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 59 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Citation 28 a (new)
- having regard to the Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provision on the European Structural and Investments Funds, particularly to articles 4, 6 and 7 12
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 74 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Recital A
A. whereas, as full citizens, all persons with disabilitiedisabled persons have equal rights in all fields of life and are entitled to inalienable dignity, equal treatment, independent living, autonomy and full participation in society;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 88 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas disability is a social construction and according to the social model of disability: - Impairment is a physical, mental or sensory functional limitation within the individual. - Disability is the loss or limitation of opportunities to take part in the "normal life" of the community equally with others due to physical and social barriers. Therefore, the term ‘disabled people’ defines “people with impairments who are disabled by socially constructed barriers”; furthermore, the term ‘people with disabilities’ refers to the disabling that effect rests within the individual person rather than from society. The term ‘disabilities’ when used in this context refers to a person’s medical condition and thus confuses disability with impairment. In addition it denies the political or ‘disability identity’
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 93 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Recital F b (new)
F b. whereas article 19 of the UN CRPD states that "States Parties to the present Convention recognize the equal right of all persons with disabilities to live in the community, with choices equal to others, and shall take effective and appropriate measures to facilitate full enjoyment by persons with disabilities of this right and their full inclusion and participation in the community";
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 109 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Recital G a (new)
G a. whereas a considerable proportion of the four million people experiencing homelessness every year have disability, having been largely overlooked as a target group of the UNCRPD and the EU Disability Strategy;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 158 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Calls on the Commission to proposepare a comprehensive, ambitious and long-term post-2020 European Disability Strategy (the post-2020 Strategy)
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 177 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 4 a (new)
- reflecting the guidance and interpretation of the UNCRPD given by the General Comments of the UNCRPD Committee, including definitions of the key terms,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 180 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 5
- mainstreaming the rights of the children with disabilities into all areas, disabled elders, women and children into all areas; regarding children making sure that the educational institutions are fully inclusive and there will be measures against the Member States that fail to fully include them in their educational systems,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 196 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 5 a (new)
- abolishing the institutionalisation in a specific time frame and supporting the practice of personal assistants for disabled people, in all Member States,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 200 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 5 b (new)
- recognising and addressing the multiple and intersectional forms of discrimination they may face, and in particular the challenges faced by women, girls, children, older and LGBTI disabled people, as well as persons from racial and ethnic minorities.
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 202 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 5 c (new)
- setting new rules for the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) in order to protect the rights of the disabled passengers concerning the safety of the integrity of both their body and equipment when transferred, and the recognition of the need for extra seats in cases of a personal assistant or laying,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 2 – indent 6 a (new)
- by creating mechanisms for the coordination of portability and adaptability of benefits and services for the disabled people between Member States inside the EU;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the post -2020 Strategy should be based on a cross-cutting, comprehensive review of all EU legislation and policy in order to ensure full harmonisation with the provisions of the UNCRPD; insists that it should include a revised declaration of competences including all policy areas in which the EU has legislated or adopted soft law measures that have an impact on persons with disabilitiesdisabled people;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to prepare the post-2020 Strategy with the close and systematic involvement of persons with disabilitiesdisabled people and of their representative organisations, and to ensure their accessible and meaningful participation in the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the post-2020 Strategy also through funding their capacity-building;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 274 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need for continuous monitoring of the implementation of the UNCRPD; calls for the collection of robust, disaggregated, comparable data on the situation of persons with disabilities to facilitate proper monitoring of progress; urges the Commission to provide adequate resources to the EU CRPD Framework to enable it to perform its functions independently and adequately;For that purpose, calls for:
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 282 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 6 – indent 1 (new)
- the collection of robust, disaggregated, comparable data on the situation of disabled people to facilitate proper monitoring of progress,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 285 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 6 – indent 3 (new)
- a flexible mechanism that can provide incentives for the optimal implementation of the CRPD. To that extent, commends initiatives like the Access City Awards and calls for relevant initiatives on the national level;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 300 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to systematically mainstream the rights of persons with disabilitiesdisabled people in all the relevant EU laws, policies and programmes;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 318 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to safeguard the UNCRPD-compliant use of EU funds and to ensure that EU funds, in a specific time period of five years, will not contribute to the construction or refurbishment of institutional care settings or any other kind of settings that could easily turn into an institution;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 327 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of legislative and non-legislative proposals regarding the Independent Living strategy that reflects the European Way of Life for the disabled people, by mainstreaming best practices - concerning Independent Living and Personal Assistance, - regarding the assistance for starting a family, - in the field of employment, - in removing all barriers (physical, intellectual, psychological, financial), that prevent disabled people from accessing quality and affordable healthcare services, and provide information in accessible formats, especially for people with lifelong disabilities, - in familiarising disabled and non- disabled people with the social model of disability and combating all stereotypes, like in the area of sexuality, through the development of campaigns and cooperation with the creative industries;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 364 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive campaign in accessible format to raise awareness of the UN CRPD among the persons with disabilitiesdisabled people and the society in general, and promote, coordinate and create educational material that can be used by the national systems;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 371 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure the EU Disability Strategy post-2020 includes the end of acts of gender-based violence, such as forced sterilisation and forced institutionalisation;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 381 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 9 c (new)
9 c. Calls on the Commission to create, in cooperation with the private sector, one portal that collects all the instruments provided for the optimal social participation of disabled people,
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 387 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Member States to re- affirm their commitment to promoting, protecting and ensuring the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disabilities, including the right to free movement and residence, by all disabled people, and to promoting respect for their inherent dignity also by implementing the post-2020 Strategy and to allocate adequate human and financial resources to its implementation;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 395 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the post-2020 Strategy will specially promote guaranteed access to employment, trainings, inclusive education, to affordable quality healthcare services, to digital services, to sport activities for disabled people;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 424 #
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 429 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to promote the term 'disabled people' rather than persons with disabilities and replace it in official documents and websites;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 446 #

2019/2975(RSP)


Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the Member States to grant voting rights to every disabled person regardless of intelligence impairments or their ability capacity and facilitate them in the voting process;
2020/02/04
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 53 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that reducingthe Commission proposal for the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 55 % by 2030 represents an enormous challenge, notably with regard to building insulation, developing public transport and achieving both an agricultural transition and a socially just transition; insists that in order to succeed in this unprecedented enterprise in only ten years, urgent action is needed, backed by a strong EU budget as of 2021;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 90 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Underlines that a timely agreement on the annual budget is crucial for the continuation of payments to fundamental policies such as cohesion and agriculture, and for their contribution to the objectives of the European Green Deal;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 105 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes, however, that in order to attain the 40 % GHG emissions reduction target by 2030, the Commission has estimated that it will be necessary to bridge a funding gap of at least EUR 500 billion every year, including social adaptation measures; considers that this funding gap is strongly underestimated even for the 40 % target, not to mention the 55 %Commission proposal for a future target, and is yet to be addressed at EU or national level; stresses the urgent need for another quantum leap in political and financial efforts in order to achieve these objectives; believes that introducing genuine new own resources is key to bridging this gap; considers that a just transition requires just funding;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 112 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers, therefore, that the whole 2021 budget must comply with the 55 %current GHG emissions reduction target, as requested in itsuntil a decision on a different target has been made, as requested in the European parliament resolution of 15 January 2020 on the European Green Deal, and with the social commitments made by the President of the Commission, in order to send the right signals to EU citizens and businesses;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 183 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3 a (new)
Sustainable transport & transport infrastructure
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 189 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Stresses that commensurate funding for transport infrastructure is instrumental in the shift to sustainable mobility through road, rail and multimodal transport, including through the completion of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T); underlines in this regard the role of Shift2Rail and the Connecting Europe Facility; calls for a stronger commitment to the deployment of sustainable alternative fuels;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 199 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3 b (new)
Ensuring the security of European citizens
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 200 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11 b. Takes note of the most recent developments in regards to the migration situation at the Greek and Bulgarian borders; therefore, underlines the need for robust EU support in the area of external and internal security, EU cross- border cooperation and law enforcement, information exchange and the fight against security threats with the support of strengthened security-related programmes and agencies; acknowledges the pivotal role and considerably increased responsibilities of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) and Europol;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 207 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3 c (new)
Continued commitment to our neighbourhood
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 212 #

2019/2213(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11 c. Welcomes the commitment of the EU towards the Western Balkans; reiterates the key role of the Union budget for the steady investments in sustainable cross-border projects and particularly in transport infrastructure and border connectivity; underlines that budget 2021 should provide adequate funding to further support to public administration, institutions, regional and local governments, and the civil society in the region;
2020/03/04
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 9 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that Europe’s economy is showing signs of less dynamic growth; points out that vulnerabilities persist ;highlights that more must be done to support Member States which are most affected by the crisis and experiencing slower growth and high unemployment, particularly where young people are concerned;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that Europe’s economy is showing signs of less dynamic growth; highlights that more must be done to support Member States which are experiencing slower growth and high unemployment, particularly where young people and vulnerable groups are concerned;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 15 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that Europe's economy is showing signs of less dynamic growthcontinues growing, although with great disparities; highlights that more must be done to support Member Stateregions which are experiencing slower growth and high unemployment, particularly where young people are concerned;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 28 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the European Semester must consistently contributetribute consistently to the elimination of social, economic and territorial inequalities and disparities between EU regions;the different regions of the EU; stresses that the continuing geographical imbalance in EIB investments is of great concern
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 43 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the European Semester should further economic and social convergence between regions and Member States by adjusting trade imbalances, reducing the excessive surplus and giving effect to existing sanctions; highlights the fact that the European goal of more inclusive growth means greater investment in growth-enhancing sustainable infrastructure, education and training, health, and research and innovation; stresses that increases in productivity should lead to increased pay;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 46 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the European Semester should further accelerate economic and social convergence between regions and Member States by adjusting trade imbalances, reducing the excessive surplus and giving effect to existing sanctions; highlights the fact that the European goal of more inclusive growth means greater investment in infrastructure, education and training, health, and research and innovation; stresses that increases in productivity should lead to increased pay;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates the crucial role of cohesion policy, as the main investment policy in Europe, in the recovery process; underlines the need to increase the budget for cohesion policy for the 2021-2027 period and increase synergies and complementarity with other EU funds, in order to maintain its European added value, thus contributing to economic growth, social inclusion, innovation and environmental protection;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 72 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the inclusion of the Sustainable Development Goals in the European Semester, with the aim of putting people, their health and the planet at the centre of economic policy; notes that, in this respect, special attention must be paid to the labour market, by safeguarding existing jobs and creating new ones; stresses that low earnings in Europe remain a challenge and that the gender pay gap, coupled with precarious employment, especially among young people, remains a serious problem that needs to be resolved urgently;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 77 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the inclusion of the Sustainable Development Goals in the European Semester, with the aim of putting people, their health and the planet at the centre of economic policy; notes that, in this respect, special attention must be paid to the labour market, by safeguardingadjusting the existing jobs and creating new ones in the context of a sustainable economic model;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 79 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the inclusion of the Sustainable Development Goals in the European Semester, with the aim of putting people, their health and the planet at the centre of economic policy; notes that, in this respect, special attention must be paid to the labour market, by safeguarding existing jobs and creating new ones in order to ensure optimal employment for all and recognizes the importance of social economy to that end;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 95 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the best response to citizens’ concerns is to support an increase in real earnings, seek greater investment in quality jobs, boost domestic demand and ensure a fairer distribution of the wealth generated; considers that the implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact should be more flexible so as to take into account cyclical conditions, structural reforms and government investment and allow optimal and inclusive growth throughout the EU;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 97 #

2019/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the best response to citizens’ concerns is to support an increase in real earnings, seek greater investment in quality jobs, boost domestic demand and ensure a fairer and inclusive distribution of the wealth generated; considers that the Stability and Growth Pact should be more flexible so as to take into account cyclical conditions, structural reforms and government investment;
2020/01/27
Committee: REGI
Amendment 5 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
– having regard to the Presidency conclusEU-Western Balkans Summit Declarations of the Thessaloniki European Council of 19 and 20, 21 June 2003, concerning the prospect of the Western Balkan countries joining the European Union,
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
– having regard to the Presidency conclusEU-Western Balkans Summit Declarations of the Thessaloniki European Council of 19 and, 201 June 2003, concerning the prospect of the Western Balkan countries joining the European Union,
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to enhance the accession process by ensuring that it strengthens fundamental values and brings sustainable democratic and economic transformation and social convergence, and by making sure that the internal reform of the EU and its enlargement run in parallel; Good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation remain essential elements of the Enlargement Process, as well as of the Stabilization and Association Process;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 71 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to enhance the accession process by ensuring that it strengthens fundamental values and brings sustainable democratic and economic transformation and social convergence, and by making sure that the internal reform of the EU and its enlargement run in parallel; Good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation remain essential elements of the Enlargement Process, as well as of the Stabilization and Association Process;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to ensure that the enhanced methodology sustains fully-fledged EU membership as the final goal and that the EU sets clear andmore predictable rules and criteria and applies them consistently, thus restoring its credibilityand credible criteria based on positive and negative conditionality, and reversibility making the accession process more dynamic and subject to strict and continuous evaluation;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to ensure that the enhanced methodology sustains fully-fledged EU membership as the final goal and that the EU; EU sets clear andmore predictable rules and criteria and applies them consistently, thus restoring its credibilityand credible criteria based on positive and negative conditionality, and reversibility making the accession process more dynamic and subject to stronger political steering;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to provide clear and consistent accession benchmarks as well as continued support throughout the process, and to improve the measuring of progress, ensuring that each accession country is assessed on the basis of itsbased on strict and fair conditionality and the principle of own merits;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 99 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to provide clear and consistent accession benchmarks as well as continued support throughout the process, and to improve the measuring of progress, ensuring that each accession country is assessed on the basis of itsbased on strict and fair conditionality and the principle of own merits;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 146 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) to consider introducing qualified majority voting on EU accession issues and maintaining the unanimity rule in the Council only for the opening and closing of accession negotiations;deleted
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 180 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
(n) to immediately open accession negotiations with Albania and North Macedonia before the upcoming EU- Western Balkans Summit of Zagreb, in May 2020, based on the positive evaluation of the progress made and of the fulfilment of the conditions identified by the EU;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 192 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o
(o) to grant visa liberalisation to Kosovo1a, as the benchmarks have been fulfilled; __________________ 1athis designation is without prejudice to position on status, and in line with UNSCR 1244/199 and ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of independence;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 193 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o
(o) to grant visa liberalisation to Kosovo1a, as the benchmarks have been fulfilled; __________________ 1athis designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and in line with UNSCR 1244/199 and ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of independence;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 199 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) to bring the primacy of democracy and the rule of law back to the very centre of the enlargement process by opening first and closing last the chapters related to the judiciary, corruption and organised crime, as well as those related to respect for humanthe protections of human rights including rights belonging to minorities and property rights and media freedom;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 200 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) to bring the primacy of democracy and the rule of law back to the very centre of the enlargement process by opening first and closing last the chapters related to the judiciary, corruption and organised crime, as well as those related to respect for humanthe protection of human rights including rights belonging to minorities and property rights and media freedom;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 256 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x
(x) to increase EU engagement in solving outstanding bilateral issues and to urge the Western Balkan countries to commit to reconciliation and peaceful solutions to longstanding disputes;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 257 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point x
(x) to increase EU engagement in solving outstanding bilateral issues and to urge the Western Balkan countries to commit to reconciliation and peaceful solutions to longstanding disputes;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 275 #

2019/2210(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z
(z) to promote and actively support the implementation of anti-discrimination policies and to insist on the prosecution of hate crimes; to encourage swifter progress towards gender equality, and in tackling discrimination and ensuring social inclusion of ethnicnational and religious minorities, people with disabilities, Roma and LGBTQI+ people by establishing inclusive policies to protect the fundamental rights of citizens;
2020/03/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 4 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to its recent Resolution of 26 November 2020 on escalating tensions in Varosha following the illegal actions by Turkey and the urgent need for the resumption of talks,
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
- having regard to the Negotiating Framework for Turkey of 3 October 2005, and to the fact that, as is the case for all candidate countries, Turkey’s accession to the EU depends on full compliance with the Copenhagen criteria, and to the need to normalize its relations with all EU Member States , including the Republic of Cyprus;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the declaration issued by the European Community and its Member States on 21 September 2005, following the declaration made by Turkey upon signature on 29 July 2005 of the Ankara Protocol, including the provision that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process, and the need for Turkey to fully implement the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement in relation to all Member States, by removing all obstacles to the free movement of goods, without restrictions or discrimination,
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to the Council Conclusions of 26 June 2018 and 18 June 2019 to the effect that the accession negotiations effectively come to a standstill and no further chapters can be considered for opening or closing and no further work towards the modernisation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union is foreseen,
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
- having regard to the Council conclusions of 26 June2018 and 18 June 2019 on enlargement and stabilisation and association process, to the Council Conclusions of 15 July and 14 October 2019 on Turkey’s illegal drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean, to the European Council conclusions of 12 December 2019, 1-2 and 15-16 October 2020, to the statements of the EU Foreign Ministers of 15 May 2020 and 14 August 2020 on the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean, to the outcome of the informal meeting of EU Foreign Ministers (Gymnich) of 28 August 2020, and to all previous relevant Council and European Council conclusions,
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
- having regard to the Council conclusions of 26 June 2018 and 18 June 2019 on enlargement and stabilisation and association process, to the Council Conclusions of 15 July and 14 October 2019 on Turkey’s illegal drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean, to the European Council conclusions of 12 December 2019, 1-2 and 15-16 October 2020, to the statements of the EU Foreign Ministers of 15 May 2020 and 14 August 2020 on the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean, to the outcome of the informal meeting of EU Foreign Ministers (Gymnich) of 28 August 2020, and to all previous relevant Council and European Council conclusions,
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #

2019/2176(INI)

- having regard to the Council conclusions of 26 June 2018 and 18 June 2019 on enlargement and stabilisation and association process, to the Council Conclusions of 15 July and 14 October 2019 on Turkey’s illegal drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean, to the European Council conclusions of 12 December 2019, 1-2 and 15-16 October 2020, to the statements of the EU Foreign Ministers of 15 May 2020 and 14 August 2020 on the situation in the Eastern Mediterranean, to the outcome of the informal meeting of EU Foreign Ministers (Gymnich) of 28 August 2020, and to all previous relevant Council and European Council conclusions,
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 48 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas being a candidate country presumes a willingnessthe commitment to progressively approachlign in all aspects with the values, interests, standards and policies and the acquis of the EU;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas being a candidate country presumes a willingnessthe commitment to progressively approachlign in all aspects with the values, interests, standards and policies and the acquis of the EU;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, in spite of this principled stance by Parliament and all of the current circumstances, the European Council, in its conclusions of 1-2 October 2020, offered Turkey a renewed and broad positive agenda, provided that constructive efforts by Turkey to stop illegal activities vis-à-vis Greece and Cyprus are sustained, in a further attempt to restore our relations;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 75 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, in spite of this principled stance by Parliament and all of the current circumstances, the European Council, in its conclusions of 1-2 October 2020, offered Turkey a renewed and broad positive agenda, provided that constructive efforts by Turkey to stop illegal activities vis-à-vis Greece and Cyprus are sustained, in a further attempt to restore our relations;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 76 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, in spite of this principled stance by Parliament and all of the current circumstances, the European Council, in its conclusions of 1-2 October 2020, offered Turkey a renewed and broad positive agenda, provided that constructive efforts by Turkey to stop illegal activities vis-à-vis Greece and Cyprus are sustained, in a further attempt to restore our relations;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 80 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, the European Council, in the same conclusions, highlighted that, in case of renewed unilateral actions or provocations in breach of international law by Turkey, the EU will use all the instruments and the options at its disposal, including in accordance with Article 29 TEU and Article 215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of its Member States, and take decisions as appropriate at the latest at its December meeting;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 81 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, the European Council, in the same conclusions, highlighted that, in case of renewed unilateral actions or provocations in breach of international law by Turkey, the EU will use all the instruments and the options at its disposal, including in accordance with Article 29 TEU and Article 215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of its Member States, and take decisions as appropriate at the latest at its December meeting;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 82 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, the European Council, in the same conclusions, highlighted that, in case of renewed unilateral actions or provocations in breach of international law by Turkey, the EU will use all the instruments and the options at its disposal, including in accordance with Article 29 TEU and Article 215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of its Member States, and take decisions as appropriate at the latest at its December meeting;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 133 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned that, over the years, the lack of progress in Turkey’s convergence has now transformed into a full withdrawal, marked by a stark regression in three main areas: backsliding on the rule of law and fundamental rights, adopting regressive institutional reforms and pursuing a war-mongering and confrontational foreign policy; is further concerned by the fact that this regression has increasingly been accompanied by an explicit anti-EU narrative; calls, in this context, on Turkey to reassess the sincerity of its commitment to the EU path, as an indispensable component of the viability of the entire accession process;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 138 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned that, over the years, the lack of progress in Turkey’s convergence has now transformed into a full withdrawal, marked by a stark regression in three main areas: backsliding on the rule of law and fundamental rights, adopting regressive institutional reforms and pursuing a war-mongering and confrontational foreign policy; is further concerned by the fact that this regression has increasingly been accompanied by an explicit anti- EU narrative; calls, in this context, on Turkey to reassess the sincerity of its commitment to the EU path, as an indispensable component of the viability of the entire accession process;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 173 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the current lack of understanding between the EU and Turkey, but reaffirms its firm conviction that Turkey ithe EU has a strategic neighbourinterest in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Turkey with which the EU wishes to have the best possible relations; Pursuing dialogue in good faith and abstaining from unilateral actions which run counter to the EU interests and violate international law, the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of EU Member States is an absolute requirement in this regard;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 174 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the current lack of understanding between the EU and Turkey, but reaffirms its firm conviction that Turkey ithe EU has a strategic neighbour and ally with which the EU wishes to have the best possible relations; interest in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Turkey with which the EU should build the best possible relations; Pursuing dialogue in good faith and abstaining from unilateral actions which run counter to the EU interests and violate international law, the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of EU Member States is an absolute requirement in this regard;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 175 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the current lack of understanding between the EU and Turkey, but reaffirms its firm conviction that Turkey ithe EU has a strategic neighbourinterest in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Turkey with which the EU wishes to have the best possible relations; pursuing dialogue in good faith and abstaining from unilateral actions which run counter to the EU interests and violate international law, the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of EU Member States is an absolute requirement in this regard;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 219 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that this fundamental area, which is at the core of the accession process, cannot be disconnected and isolated from overall relations and that it remains along with the full respect of international law and the fundamental principle of good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation, the main obstacles to progress on any positive agenda that could be offered to Turkey;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 220 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that this fundamental area, which is at the core of the accession process, cannot be disconnected and isolated from overall relations and that it remains along with the full respect of international law and the fundamental principle of good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation, the main obstacles to progress on any positive agenda that could be offered to Turkey;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 221 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that this fundamental area, which is at the core of the accession process, cannot be disconnected and isolated from overall relations and that it remains along with the full respect of international law and the fundamental principle of good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation, the main obstacles to progress on any positive agenda that could be offered to Turkey;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 230 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes with deep concern that, despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in July 2018, its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt; , as, inter alia, a plethora of legal provisions and restrictive elements of the emergency rule have been integrated into law
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 231 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes with deep concern that, despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in July 2018, its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt;, as, inter alia a plethora of legal provisions and restrictive elements of the emergency rule have been integrated into law.
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 234 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes with deep concern that, despite the formal lifting of the state of emergency in July 2018, its impact on democracy and fundamental rights continues to be strongly felt;, as, inter alia, that a plethora of legal provisions and restrictive elements of the emergency rule have been integrated into law.
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 357 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Notes that EU funding to Turkey will be subject to rules on conditionality, including for respecting the principles of the United Nations Charter, international law and European values and principles.
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 396 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Strongly condemns the Turkish decision to convert such an emblematic World Cultural Heritage Monument, as Hagia Sophia Museum, to a mosque and calls on the Turkish authorities to urgently reverse their decision;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 397 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Strongly condemns the Turkish decision to convert such an emblematic World Cultural Heritage Monument, as Hagia Sophia Museum, to a mosque and calls on the Turkish authorities to urgently reverse their decision;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 398 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. 22. Strongly condemns the Turkish decision to convert such an emblematic World Cultural Heritage Monument, as Hagia Sophia Museum, to a mosque and calls on the Turkish authorities to urgently reverse their decision;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 440 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Is concerned about the ever more frequent use of a hyper-nationalist and war- mongering narrative among the ruling elite that increasingly gives rise to antagonistic approaches towards the EU or its Member States; is concerned about the increasing clout of religious conservatism in political life;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 443 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Is concerned about the ever more frequent use of a hyper-nationalist and war- mongering narrative among the ruling elite that increasingly gives rise to antagonistic approaches towards the EU or its Member States; is concerned about the increasing clout of religious conservatism in political life;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 450 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Calls on the Turkish government to respect and fully implement the legal obligations deriving from the Conventions to which it is a contracting party, and to halt the destruction of the cultural heritage in the occupied areas of Cyprus; calls on Turkey to ratify the 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; calls on Turkey to cooperate with the relevant international organisations, especially the Council of Europe, in preventing and combating illicit trafficking and the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 462 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Strongly condemns the removal of 47 democratically elected mayors from office on the basis of questionable evidence and, in particular, their arbitrary replacement by unelected trustees appointed by the central government; strongly believes these unlawful decisions constitute a direct attack on the most basic principles of democracy, depriving millions of voters of their democratically elected representation;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 463 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Strongly condemns the removal of 47 democratically elected mayors from office on the basis of questionable evidence and, in particular, their arbitrary replacement by unelected trustees appointed by the central government; strongly believes these unlawful decisions constitute a direct attack on the most basic principles of democracy, depriving millions of voters of their democratically elected representation;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 467 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. 26. Is alarmed by the fact that Turkey’s foreign policy increasingly collides with the priorities and goals of EU’s common foreign and security policy; notes with deep concern that the rate of Turkey’s alignment with the common foreign policy of the EU is constantly deteriorating and is at present reduced to 14%, which is a historic low.
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 468 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. RWhile recallsing the laudable role played by Turkeysubstantial efforts Turkey has made in responding to the migrationrefugee crisis resulting from the war in Syria; takes the view that the EU should continue to give the necessary support to Syrian refugees and host communities in Turkey; supports an objective assessment of, the EP strongly rejects Turkey's instrumentalisation of migratory pressure for political purposes that took place at the EU’s external borders in late February-March 2020; takes the view that the EU should continue to give the necessary support to Syrian refugees and host communities in Turkey in line with strict conditionality, including for respecting the principles of the United Nations Charter and International Law, and monitoring mechanisms of Turkey’s performance; underlines that Turkey has to fully and effectively implement the provisions of both the 2016 EU – Turkey Statement and the EU – Turkey Readmission Agreement with regard to all Member States; supports the EU-Turkey Statement and underlines the importance of both parties’Turkey’s compliance with theirits respective commitments;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 469 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. RWhile recallsing the laudable role played by Turkeysubstantial efforts Turkey has made in responding to the migration-refugee crisis resulting from the war in Syria, the EP strongly rejects Turkey's instrumentalisation of migratory pressure for political purposes that took place at the EU’s external borders in late February-March 2020; takes the view that the EU should continue to give the necessary support to Syrian refugees and host communities in Turkey; supports an objective assessment of in line with strict conditionality including for respecting the principles of the United Nations Charter and International Law, and monitoring mechanisms of Turkey’s performance; underlines that Turkey has to fully and effectively implement the provisions of both the 2016 EU – Turkey Statement and the EU – Turkey Readmission Agreement with regard to all Member States; supports the EU-Turkey Statement and underlines the importance of both parties’Turkey’s compliance with theirits respective commitments;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 493 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Is alarmed by the fact that Turkey’s foreign policy increasingly collides with the priorities and goals of EU’s common foreign and security policy; notes with deep concern that the rate of Turkey’s alignment with the common foreign policy of the EU is constantly deteriorating and is at present reduced to 14%, which is a historic low.
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 494 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Is alarmed by the fact that Turkey’s foreign policy increasingly collides with the priorities and goals of EU’s common foreign and security policy; notes with deep concern that the rate of Turkey’s alignment with the common foreign policy of the EU is constantly deteriorating and is at present reduced to 14%, which is a historic low;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 502 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that a modernisation of the Customs Union could be beneficial for both parties and would keep Turkey economically and normatively anchored to the EU; reiterates that this would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms and the full respect of international law and the fundamental principle of good neighbourly relations; highlights that it seemis unrealistic to envisage any modernisation of the Customs Union givenas long as Turkey continues to move further away from the cEurrent circumstances; recalls that the current Customs Union will not achieve its full potential until Turkey fullyopean Union, in accordance with Council conclusions of 26 June 2018 and 18 June 2019 recalls that the current Customs Union needs to be implemented by Turkey in a full and non- discriminatory way; this is not the case as long as Turkey has been systematically refusing to implements the Additional Protocol in relation to all Member States; and it has been systematically violating critical provisions of the current Customs Union; calls on Turkey to eliminate immediately all the technical barriers, the localisation schemes and domestic requirements that discriminate against EU products and still prevent the free movement of goods in profound breach of the Customs Union obligations;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 503 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses that a modernisation of the Customs Union could be beneficial for both parties and would keep Turkey economically and normatively anchored to the EU; reiterates that this would need to be based on strong conditionality related to human rights and fundamental freedoms and the full respect of international law and the fundamental principle of good neighbourly relations; highlights that it seemis unrealistic to envisage any modernisation of the Customs Union givenas long as Turkey continues to move further away from the cEurrent circumstances; recalls that the current Customs Union will not achieve its full potential until Turkey fullyopean Union, in accordance with Council conclusions of 26 June2018 and 18 June 2019 recalls that the current Customs Union needs to be implemented by Turkey in a full and non- discriminatory way; this is not the case as long as Turkey has been systematically refusing to implements the Additional Protocol in relation to all Member States; and it has been systematically violating critical provisions of the current Customs Union; calls on Turkey to eliminate immediately all the technical barriers, the localisation schemes and domestic requirements that discriminate against EU products and still prevent the free movement of goods in profound breach of the Customs Union obligations;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 530 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the Eastern Mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation;Turkey’s unprecedented illegal and aggressive behaviour in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Aegean Sea, its warmongering rhetoric and the related risk of a military escalation by an EU candidate country against EU Member States ; strongly condemns Turkey’s violations of Greek national airspace, including over flights of inhabited areas, and territorial sea, a conduct which not only constitutes a serious, ongoing violation of international law, but also creates the risk of an armed incident ;strongly condemns Turkey’s illegal activities in Greek and Cypriot waters, which violate bothe sovereignty, the sovereign rights of EU Member States and international law; expresses its full solidarity with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; expresses its grave concern for the illegal Turkish fishing activities within Greek territorial waters in the Aegean Sea and the unregulated and unreported fishing activities of Turkish fishing fleet in international waters in the Aegean Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean; urges Turkey to fully respect international law and the law of the sea, to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; notes that the Council’s Conclusions of 15 July 2019 in light of Turkey’s continued and new illegal drilling activities , not to hold the Association Council and further meetings of the EU-Turkey high-level dialogues for the time being, along with the Council’s Decision 2019/1894, of11 November 2019, to impose restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorized drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean, are the first instances where such reactions were deemed necessary in view of the conduct of a candidate country;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 531 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the Eastern Mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; condemns Turkey’s illegal activities in Turkey’s unprecedented illegal and aggressive behaviour in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Aegean Sea, its warmongering rhetoric and the related risk of a military escalation by an EU candidate country against EU Member States ; strongly condemns Turkey’s violations of Greek national airspace, including overflights of inhabited areas, and territorial sea, a conduct which not only constitutes as serious, ongoing violation of international law, but also creates the risk of an armed incident ;strongly condemns Turkey’s illegal activities in Greek and Cypriot waters, which violate bothe sovereignty, the sovereign rights of EU Member States and international law; expresses its full solidarity with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threatexpresses its grave concern for the illegal Turkish fishing activities within Greek territorial waters in the Aegean Sea and the unregulated and unreported fishing activities of Turkish fishing fleet in international waters in the Aegean Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean; urges Turkey to fully respect international law and the law of the sea, to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; notes that the Council’s Conclusions of 15 July 2019 in light of Turkey’s continued and new illegal drilling activities , not to hold the Association Council and further meetings of the EU-Turkey high-level dialogues for the time being, along with the Council’s Decision 2019/1894, of11 November 2019, to impose restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorized drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean, are the first instances where such reactions were deemed necessary in view of the conduct of a candidate country;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 536 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the Eastern Mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; strongly condemns Turkey’s illegal activities in Greek and Cypriot waters, which violate both the sovereign rights of EU Member States and international law; expresses its full solidarity with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone, explore and exploit its natural resources and calls on Turkey to respect relevant international law (UNCLOS); urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations. Urges Turkey to show restraint and to respect Cyprus’ sovereignty over its territorial sea and Cyprus’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone.
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 547 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Is deeply concerned by the ongoing dispute in the Eastern Mediterranean and the related risk of a military escalation; strongly condemns Turkey’s illegal activities in Greek and Cypriot waters, which violate both the sovereign rights of EU Member States and international law; expresses its full solidarity with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes and to refrain from any unilateral and illegal action or threat;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 556 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Condemns the partial reopening of Varosha beach, which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the Cyprus issue; calls on Turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, the EU acquis, and on the basis of respect for the principles on which the Union is founded; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to begin withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN and its lawful inhabitants in accordance with UNSC Resolution 550(1984), as an effort to pave the way for a democratic comprehensive settlement, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 560 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. CStrongly condemns the partial reopening of Varosha beach, which violates international law and UN Security Council Resolutions 550 and 789 and undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the Cyprus issue; underlines the importance of the status of Varosha and calls on Turkey to immediately reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, as set out in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions;, in accordance with International law, the EU acquis and the principles on which the Union is founded;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 561 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. CStrongly condemns the partial reopening of Varosha beach, which violates international law and UN Security Council Resolutions 550 and 789 and undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the Cyprus issue; underlines the importance of the status of Varosha and calls on Turkey to immediately reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, as set out in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, in accordance with International law, the EU acquis and the principles on which the Union is founded;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 562 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. C29.Strongly condemns the partial reopening of Varosha beach, which violates international law and UN Security Council Resolutions 550and 789 and undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the Cyprus issue; underlines the importance of the status of Varosha and calls on Turkey to immediately reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality; as set out in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions;, in accordance with International law, the EU acquis and the principles on which the Union is founded;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 571 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. CStrongly condemns the partial reopening of Varosha beach, which undermines mutual trust and therefore the prospect of the resumption of direct talks on the comprehensive resolution of the Cyprus issue; calls on Turkey to reverse this action; reiterates its support for a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement on the basis of a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 575 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Calls on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the construction of the Akkuyu nuclear power plant; requests that the Turkish Government join the Espoo Convention; asks the Turkish Government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries, such as Greece and Cyprus, during any further developments in the Akkuyu venture.
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 635 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. RegretsCondemns the fact that, rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group, Turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 675 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Takes the view that enhancing communication and dialogue at all levels are key to restoring mutual trust between the EU and Turkey; deplores the continuous and unjustified refusal of the Turkish side to reinstate the normal functioning of the EU- Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee; at the same time, recalls that the Council’s decision of 15July 2019 not to hold the EU – Turkey Association Council and further meetings of the EU – Turkey high level dialogues by virtue of Turkish illegal drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean, remains valid;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 677 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Takes the view that enhancing communication and dialogue at all levels are key to restoring mutual trust between the EU and Turkey; deplores the continuous and unjustified refusal of the Turkish side to reinstate the normal functioning of the EU- Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee; at the same time, recalls that the Council’s decision of 15 July 2019 not to hold the EU – Turkey Association Council and further meetings of the EU – Turkey high level dialogues by virtue of Turkish illegal drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean, remains valid;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 687 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Takes into account not only the absence of any progress in engaging with Turkey, but also the renewed escalation on the Turkish side by unilateral actions and provocations in breach of international law by the latter, and calls on the Council to develop a list of further restrictive measures that should be sectoral and targeted; in this spirit, recalls the European Council’s conclusions of 1- 2 October 2020 that the EU will use all the instruments and the options at its disposal, including in accordance with Articles 29 TEU and 215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of its Member – States;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 688 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Takes into account not only the absence of any progress in engaging with Turkey, but also the renewed escalation on the Turkish side by unilateral actions and provocations in breach of international law by the latter, and calls on the Council to develop a list of further restrictive measures that should be sectoral and targeted; in this spirit, recalls the European Council’s conclusions of 1- 2 October 2020 that the EU will use all the instruments and the options at its disposal, including in accordance with Articles 29 TEU and 215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of its Member – States;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 697 #

2019/2176(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Instructs its President to forward35.Takes into account not only the absence of any progress in engaging with Turkey, but also thise resolunewed escalation ton the President of the European Council,Turkish side by unilateral actions and provocations in breach of international law by the latter, and calls on the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the President, Government and Parliament of the Republic of Turkey.o develop a list of further restrictive measures that should be sectoral and targeted; in this spirit, recalls the European Council’s conclusions of 1-2 October 2020 that the EU will use all the instruments and the options at its disposal, including in accordance with Articles 29 TEU and215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of its Member – States;
2020/12/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that progress in accession under the revised enlargement methodology depends on lasting, in-depth and irreversible reforms across fundamental areas, in particular the rule of law and the fight against corruption, judiciary and fundamental rights, good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the importance of implementing the electoral reform measures codified in July 2020, which are in line with the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR) recommendations; welcomes the commitment tolooks forward to the implementation of the forthcoming Venice Commission opinion regarding the amendments to the Electoral Code adopted in October 2020, in line with the relevant commitment expressed by the Albanian government;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 100 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Commends the steady progress made in implementing the comprehensive judicial reform, underpinned by the unprecedented vetting process and the establishment of the relevant institutions and specialised bodies, enablingand calls for the acceleration of these procedures in order to achieve a tangible shift towards an accountable and independent judiciary;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 110 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the fact that, as a first step, the High Court has regained its ability to function and that it has been reviewing the admissibility of more than a thousand cases, and encourages it to make further progress in the appointment of additional judges, in order to become fully functional;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 157 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls the importance of measures ensuring the pUrges to swiftly adopt the remaining five by-laws to ensure full implementation of the 2017 framework Law on the Protection of nNational mMinorities, including and the related rights to free self- identification, the use of minority languages and property rightthe right to education in minority languages;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 162 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Welcomes the law on the census (Nr.140/2020), voted by the Parliament on the 26th of November and calls on Albania to take all the necessary steps, e.g. preparation of the questionnaire and the manual, in order to effectively implement it;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Encourages Albania to make further progress on measures consolidating property rights, implementing the law on transitional ownershipprocedures ownership, mainly by advancing in a transparent manner the process of registration of properties, and completing the comprehensive land sector reform;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 252 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Welcomes Albania’s unremitting efforts in promoting good neighbourly relations and regional integration;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 255 #

2019/2170(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
46. Commends the constructive steps towards the resolution of outstanding bilateral issues, including a joint undertaking by Greece and Albania to resolve a dispute over their Ionian maritime border through ifer the delimitation of the maritime zones to the International jCourt of Justice;
2020/12/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 146 #

2019/2157(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the EU’s forests are multifunctional and characterised by great diversity, including differences in ownership patterns, size, structure, biodiversity, resilience and challenges; points out, in addition, that forests offer society a wide variety of ecosystem services including raw materials, renewable energy1a, improved air quality, clean water, erosion control, and protection from droughts, floods and avalanches; _________________ 1aBioenergy is the largest renewable energy source in Europe (covering alone 10.3% of EU energy demand in 2017). Biomass is sourced mainly locally from forestry residues and low value streams. The key role of forests in providing renewable energy should be taken into account.
302/01/01
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that cohesion is one EU objective as set up in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union, is defined in Article 174 TFEU and is a shared competence between the EU and Member States. Underlines that cohesion policy is one of the most important EU policies and also its main public investment policy, with EUR 351.8 billion budget for 2014-2020: a third of the MFF; insists that there should be no further cuts to the Cohesion Policy budget;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 15 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that budgetary year 2020 is the last one of the current MFF period and therefore stresses the importance of preparation and smooth adaptation to the new financial period;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 16 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Stresses that the 2021-2027 Cohesion Policy Fund should not decrease in volume from 2020 levels, even in case of Brexit, and that new EU initiatives must be matched with new and adequate financial resources and be dealt with under the co-decision procedure;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 17 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3 c. Is deeply concerned about the budgetary consequences of a non-deal Brexit and, since regions need to plan their activity in advance, strongly opposes any unexpected cut of cohesion policy allocations in 2020 in case there is no agreement between the Union and the United Kingdom;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 22 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the Council to consider the lessons of this programming period and avoid any further payment criseture delays;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 34 #

2019/2028(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Stresses the challenge to address the climate change goal also by supporting the 41 regions dependent on coal to decarbonize their economy and re- skilling and up-skilling workers on the coal sector and as such calls for flexibility in reprogramming, wherever necessary, with a view to allocating cohesion funding to this scope. In order to address a smooth transition for these regions, calls for the establishment of a Just Transition Fund, providing additional funding, within the Multi-annual Financial Framework 2021-2027;
2041/01/05
Committee: REGI
Amendment 150 #

2019/0254(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013
Article 25 – paragraph 12
12. For calendar year 2021s during the transitional period, Member States may decide to apply further internal convergence by applying paragraph 11 to the respective year.; (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.) Or. en (Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 Article 25 – paragraph 12)
2020/03/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 206 #

2019/0254(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Regulation (EU) No 229/2013
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The Union shall finance the measures provided for in Chapters III and IV up to an amount of EUR 23 00930 000. (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.) Or. en (Regulation (EU) No 229/2013)
2020/03/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 209 #

2019/0254(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Regulation (EU) No 229/2013
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. The amount allocated to finance the specific supply arrangements referred to in Chapter III shall not exceed EUR 6 837 110 000.' . (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.) Or. en (Regulation (EU) No 229/2013)
2020/03/04
Committee: REGI
Amendment 59 #

2018/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas new areas of tension between the EU and Russia have arisen since 2015, including: Russian intervention in Syria; large-scale military exercises (Zapad 2017); russian interference aimed at influencing elections and stoking tensions in European societies; restrictions on fundamental freedoms and extensive human rights violations in Russia, including the systemic targeting of human rights defenders and civil society in Russia, discrimination against the Tatar minority in occupied Crimeanon-Russian speaking people, in illegally annexed Crimea, which disproportionately affect the Tatar minority, and the politically motivated persecution of Alexei Navalny and many others; cyber attacks and assassinations on European soil carried out by Russian intelligence agents using chemical weapons; the intimidation, arrest and imprisonment of foreign citizens in Russia in breach of international law, including Oleg Sentsov and many others; the organisation of illegal and illegitimate elections in the Donbas; flawed presidential elections lacking any real choice and with restrictions on fundamental freedoms; violations of arms control agreements;
2019/01/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 132 #

2018/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes therefore that the EU- Russia relationship requires a new framework of cooperation only in thosein areas that are necessary and in a common interest, and with a view to guaranteeing security in the EU’s neighbourhood and a European peace order; is of the view that the PCA should be discontinued;
2019/01/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 296 #

2018/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls for more people-to-people contacts, for instance through common religious institutions, like the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, as well as regional and local level cooperation and student exchanges also in the Erasmus Mundus framework; notes that the EU provides the highest number of academic mobility opportunities to Russia in comparison with other international partner countries;
2019/01/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 326 #

2018/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that the EU should stand ready to consider adopting further sanctions, including targeted personal sanctions, in response to Russia’s continued actionsshould Russia fail to understand the need to act in line with the International Law;
2019/01/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
— having regard to its previous resolutions on Turkey, in particular those of 24 November 2016 on EU-Turkey relations1 , of 27 October 2016 on the situation of journalists in Turkey2 , and of 8 February 2018 on the human rights situation in Turkey3 , _________________ 1 2 3[3] and of 13 November 2014 on Turkish actions creating tensions in the exclusive economic zone of Cyprus, _________________ 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0450. Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0450. 2 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0423. Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0423. Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0040.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
— having regard to its previous resolutions on Turkey, in particular those of 24 November 2016 on EU-Turkey relations1 , of 27 October 2016 on the situation of journalists in Turkey2 , and, of 8 February 2018 on the human rights situation in Turkey3 , _________________ 1 2 3 and of 13 November 2014 on Turkish actions creating tensions in the exclusive economic zone of Cyprus, Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0450. Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0423. Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0040.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 4 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 15 April 2015 on the centenary of the Armenian Genocide1a _________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0094
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
— having regard to the Presidency conclusions of 13 December 2016 and the Council Conclusions of 26 June 2018, and to the previous relevant Council and European Council conclusions,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
— having regard to the Presidency conclusions of 13 December 2016 and the Council Conclusions of 26 June 2018, and to the previous relevant Council and European Council conclusions,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7
— having regard to the declaration issued by the European Community and its Member States on 21 September 2005, including the provision that the recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the negotiations, and to the need for Turkey to proceed to the normalization of its relations with all Member States and to fully implement the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement towards all MS, by removing all obstacles to the free movement of goods, withoutincluding restrictions orn means of transport, without prejudice and discrimination,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7
— having regard to the declaration issued by the European Community and its Member States on 21 September 2005, including the provision that the recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the negotiations, and to the need for Turkey to proceed to the normalization of its relations with all Member States and to fully implement the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement towards all MS, by removing all obstacles to the free movement of goods, withoutincluding restrictions orn means of transport, without prejudice and discrimination,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the Fact-finding Visit by the Committee on Petitions to Famagusta, Cyprus (07-08.05.2018),
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
— having regard to Article 46 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which states that the contracting parties undertake to abide by the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in any case to which they are parties, and to the obligation of Turkey to implement all judgements of the European Courts,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
— having regard to the Commission recommendation of 21 December 2016 for a Council dDecision authorising the opening of negotiations with Turkey on an aAgreement on the extension of the scope of the bilateral preferential trade relationship and on the modernisation of the Customs Union, as well as the Council Conclusions of 26 June 2018 stating that no further work towards the modernisation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union is foreseen,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
— having regard to the Commission recommendation of 21 December 2016 for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations with Turkey on an agreement on the extension of the scope of the bilateral preferential trade relationship and on the modernisation of the Customs Union, as well as the Council Conclusions of 26 June 2018 stating that no further work towards the modernisation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union is foreseen,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
— having regard to the Commission recommendation of 21 December 2016 for a Council dDecision authorising the opening of negotiations with Turkey on an aAgreement on the extension of the scope of the bilateral preferential trade relationship and on the modernisation of the Customs Union, as well as the Council Conclusions of 26June 2018 stating that no further work towards the modernisation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union is foreseen,
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the decision of 19 July 2018 to lifNotes that the state of emergency, which was introduced after the 2016 coup attempt and, has been extended 7 times; Welcomes, however, the decision of 19 July 2018 to lift the state of emergency; notes that the prolonged state of emergency has led to an erosion of the rule of law and deterioration of human rights in Turkey; regrets that the adoption of new legislative proposals preserves many of the abusive powers granted to the Ppresident and the executive under the state of emergency and thereby dampens any positive effect of its termination; is concerned about the serious backsliding in the areas of freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, freedom of association and procedural and property rights;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 71 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Turkish government to respect and fully implement the legal obligations, which it has entered into, concerning the protection of its diverse cultural heritage, by improving the care, restoration and enhancement of its monuments; calls on Turkey to ratify the 2005 UNESCO convention on the protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; calls on Turkey to cooperate with the relevant international organisations, especially the Council of Europe, in preventing and combating illicit trafficking and the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Deplores the fact that the Venice Commission recommendation on the status of religious communities in Turkey and the right of the Orthodox Patriarch to use the title "Ecumenical" are yet to be implemented and that the Halki (Heybeliada) Greek Orthodox Seminary remains closed. Furthermore, regrets the fact that the Council of Europe Resolution 1625 (2008) regarding property rights on the islands of Gokceada (Imvros) and Bozcaada (Tenedos) has not been fully implemented yet and that the electoral regulation for non-Muslim foundations is still not published after its annulment in 2013;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 80 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Expresses concern at the shrinking space for civil society and the promotion of fundamental rights and freedoms; notes that a large number of activists, including human rights defenders, were arrested and demonstrations were recurrently banned during the state of emergency; calls on Turkey to protect the fundamental rights of minorities, such as LGBTI people, as well as religious minorities;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Is seriously concerned about the lack of respect for the freedom of religion, about continuous discrimination against religious minorities, including Christians and Alevis and violence on religious grounds, including verbal and physical attacks, stigmatisation and social pressure at schools, and problems in relation to legally establishing a place of worship; expects the Turkish government to treat every Turkish citizen without any prejudice towards his or her religious belief; calls on the Turkish authorities to promote positive and effective reforms in the area of freedom of thought, conscience and religion, by enabling religious communities to obtain legal personality, allowing charitable foundations to elect their governing bodies, eliminating all restrictions on the training, appointment and succession of the clergy, complying with the relevant judgements of the ECtHR and the recommendations of the Venice Commission and by eliminating all forms of discrimination or barriers based on religion; calls on Turkey to respect the distinct character and importance of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and to recognise its legal personality; reiterates the need to allow the reopening of the Halki Seminary and lift all obstacles to its proper functioning; urges the Turkish authorities to combat seriously all manifestations of anti-Semitism in society; calls on the Turkish government to implement the action plan it submitted in 2016 to the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers related to the ECtHR decisions on Cem Houses and on compulsory religion classes and to put in place a comprehensive legal framework in line with European standards; believes that appropriate attention must be paid to implementing the ECtHR judgments on compulsory religion and ethics classes, indication of religious affiliation on identity cards and Alevi worship places;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 88 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on the Turkish government to respect and fully implement the legal obligations deriving from the Conventions to which it is a contracting party, and to halt the destruction of the cultural heritage in the occupied areas of Cyprus; calls on Turkey to ratify the 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; calls on Turkey to cooperate with the relevant international organisations, especially the Council of Europe, in preventing and combating illicit trafficking and the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Calls on the Turkish government to respect and fully implement the legal obligations which it has entered into concerning the protection of cultural heritage, and, in particular, to draw up in good faith an integrated inventory of Greek, Armenian, Assyrian and other cultural heritage that was destroyed or ruined in the course of the last century; calls on Turkey to ratify the 2005 UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; calls on Turkey to cooperate with the relevant international organisations, especially the Council of Europe, in preventing and combating illicit trafficking and the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Urges Turkey to end the repeated violations of Greek and Cypriot airspace and territorial waters, as these actions are not conducive to good neighbourly relations and undermine regional stability and security; calls on Turkey to avoid any kind of threat or action directed against a Member State, or any source of friction or action that damages good neighbourly relations and the peaceful settlement of disputes and reminds the need for Turkey to unequivocally commit to good neighbourly relations, international agreements, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which is part of the EU acquis and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the UN Charter, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice. In this framework, it once again expresses its regret that the casus belli threat, declared by the Turkish Grand National Assembly against Greece has not yet been withdrawn;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 171 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, taking all of the above into account andTaking all of the above into account, calls on the Commission and the Council of the European Union, in accordance with the Negotiating Framework, to formally suspend the accession negotiations with Turkey unless Turkey complies with the Copenhagen criteria and implements its contractual obligations towards all MSs; remains, however, committed to democratic dialogue with Turkey; and asks the Commission to use, during the formal suspension of negotiations, all funds available under IPA II and the future IPA III to support, through a dedicated envelope directly managed by the EU, Turkey’s civil society, and to increase opportunities for people- to- people contacts, academic dialogue, access for Turkish students to European universities and media platforms for journalists under the condition of promoting the EU relations on the basis of democratic values and principles;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 176 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, taking all of the above into account and in accordance with the Negotiating Framework, to formally suspend the accession negotiations with Turkey; remains, however,Taking all the above into account, calls on the Commission and the Council of the European Union, to exert further pressure on Turkey in order to comply with the Copenhagen criteria and implement its contractual obligations towards all Member States; remains committed to democratic dialogue with Turkey; and asks the Commission to use, during the formal suspension of negotiations, all funds available under IPA II and the future IPA III to support, through a dedicated envelope directly managed by the EU, Turkey’s civil society, and to increase opportunities for people-to-people contacts, academic dialogue, access for Turkish students to European universities and media platforms for journalists;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 181 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that while the EU accession process was at its start a strong motivation for reforms in Turkey, there has been a stark regression in the areas of the rule of law and human rights during the last few years; recalls that Parliament repeatedly called for the opening of Chapter 23 on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights and Chapter 24 on Justice, Freedom and Security at a time whe and repeats its calls on the Turkish government had pledged to conduct serious reforms; regrets deeply that the accession instruments could not be used to the fullest extent owing to a continued blockage by the Council;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 184 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that while the EU accession process was at its start a strong motivation for reforms in Turkey, there has been a stark regression in the areas of the rule of law and human rights during the last few years; recalls that the European Parliament repeatedly called for the opening of Chapter 23 on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights and Chapter 24 on Justice, Freedom and Security at a time when the Turkish government had pledged to conduct serious reforms and normalise its judicial, legal, political and diplomatic relations with all member states; regrets deeply that the accession instruments could not be used to the fullest extent owingdue to a continued blockage by the Council;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 185 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that while the EU accession process was at its start a strong motivation for reforms in Turkey, there has been a starkmassive regression in the areas of the rule of law and human rights during the last few years; recallnotes that Parliament repeatedly called for the opening of Chapter 23 on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights and Chapter 24 on Justice, Freedom and Security atTurkey has been moving further away from the EU; deeply deplores the a ntime when the Turkish government had pledged to conduct serious reforms; regrets deeply that the accession instruments could not be used to the fullest extent owing to a continued blockage by the Council-EU rhetoric of the Turkish President which has clouded the mutual relationship and thus led to the current standstill in any negotiation process;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 192 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Calls on the European Council for a EU embargo on arms sales to Turkey as a response to its expansionary and repressive policy outside of Turkey;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 198 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that a door should be left open for the modernisation and upgradinge of the 1995 Customs Union between the EU and Turkey, to include relevant areas such as agriculture, services and public procurement, which currently are not covered; recalls that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States and that Turkey is an important growth market for the EU; believes that the upgrade would provide a valuable opportunity for democratic conditionality, positive leverage and the possibility of a roadmap where the upgradinge of the Ccustoms Uunion would go hand in hand with concrete commitments by Turkey on democratic reforms with full respect to relevant agreements and the legal system of the EU and its member states; believes further that the upgradinge of the Ccustoms Uunion wcould provide an important opportunity for policy dialogue on climate change as well as on labour rights in Turkey; calls on the Commission to start preparatory works for the upgradinge of the Customs Union as soon as the Turkish Ggovernment indicates its readiness for serious reforms and at a time when it fulfils all the obligations stemming from the current custom union between Turkey and the EU including also the Additional Protocol concerning the Republic of Cyprus;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 199 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. BelievStresses that a door should be left openprerequisite for the modernisation and upgrading of the 1995 Customs Union between the EU and Turkey, to include relevant areas such as agriculture, services and public procurement, which currently are not covered; recalls that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States and that Turkey is an important growth market for the EU; believes that the upgrade would provide a valuable opportunity for democratic conditionality, positive leverage and the possibility of a roadmap where upgrading the Customs Union would go hand in hand with concrete commitments by Turkey on democratic reformis that Turkey proceeds to the full, effective and non-discriminatory implementation of the existing Customs Union vis-à-vis all MS, including the Republic of Cyprus; believes further that the upgradinge of the Ccustoms Uunion wcould provide an important opportunity for policy dialogue on climate change as well as on labour rights in Turkey; calls on the Commission to start preparatory work for the upgrading of the Customs Union as soon as the Turkish Government indicates its readiness for serious reformsReminds that EU trade agreements shall always be in line with EU principles on human rights, democracy and the rule of law;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 201 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that a door should be left open for thRecalls the need for Turkey to implement in a full and non- discriminatory manner the current customs union towards all Member States and believes that following this, the possible modernisation and upgrading of the 1995 Customs Union between the EU and Turkey, to include relevant areas such as agriculture, services and public procurement, which currently are not covered, could then proceed; recalls that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States and that Turkey is an important growth market for the EU; believes that the upgrade would provide a valuable opportunity for democratic conditionality, positive leverage and the possibility of a roadmap where upgrading the Customs Union would go hand in hand with concrete commitments by Turkey on democratic reforms; believes further that the upgrading of the Customs Union wcould provide an important opportunity for policy dialogue on climate change as well as on labour rights in Turkey; calls on the Commission to start preparatory work for the upgrading of the Customs Union as soon as the Turkish Government indicates its readiness for serious reforms;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 205 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that a door should be left open for the modernisation and upgrading of the 1995 Customs Union between the EU and Turkey, to include relevant areas such as agriculture, services and public procurement, which currently are not covered; recalls that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States and that Turkey is an important growth market for the EU; believes that the upgrade would provide a valuable opportunity for democratic conditionality, positive leverage and the possibility of a roadmap where upgrading the Customs Union would go hand in hand with concrete commitments by Turkey on democratic reforms, rule of law and good neighbourly relations; believes further that the upgrading of the Customs Union would provide an important opportunity for policy dialogue on climate change as well as on labour rights in Turkey; calls on the Commission to start preparatory work for the upgrading of the Customs Union as soon as the Turkish Government indicates its readiness for serious reforms;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 217 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Reiterates its call on Turkey to fulfil its obligation of full, non- discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus, regrets that Turkey has still not made progress towards the normalization of its relations with the Republic of Cyprus; reiterates that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process and calls for progress without any further delay;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 232 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that visa liberalisation is of great importance for Turkish citizens, particularly for students, academics, business representatives, and people with family ties in EU Mmember Sstates; encourages the Turkish Government to fully and in a non-discriminatory manner comply with the 72 criteria identified in the visa liberalisation roadmap, towards all Member States; stresses that the revision of Turkey’s anti-terrorism legislation is a key condition forto ensuring fundamental rights and freedoms, and that visa liberalisation willcould be possible once all the criteria have been metfully and effectively met, in a non-discriminatory manner, towards all Member States;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 238 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that visa liberalisation is of great importance for Turkish citizens, particularly for students, academics, business representatives and people with family ties in EU Member States; encourages the Turkish Government to fully and in a non-discriminatory manner comply with the 72 criteria identified in the visa liberalisation roadmap; towards all Member States, stresses that the revision of Turkey’s anti-terrorism legislation is a key condition for ensuring fundamental rights and freedoms, and that visa liberalisation willcould be possible once all the criteria have been metfully and effectively met, in a non- discriminatory manner towards all Member States;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 249 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls the important role played by Turkey in responding to the migration crisis resulting from the war in Syria; takes the view that Turkey’s population has shown great hospitality by offering shelter to more than 3 million Syrian refugees; calnotes that the number of irregular arrivals ton the EU and its Member States to keep their promise regarding a large-scale resettlement, anduropean Union from Turkey has significantly risen in 2018 compared to last year; calls in Turkey to increase patrolling efforts and vigilance in its western borders; underlines the importance of the full and effective implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement, with a view to bringing the flow to halt; calls on Turkey to implement fully and effectively the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement and to re-launch without further delay the implementation of the bilateral readmission protocol with Greece; highlights the importance of a large-scale resettlement, and calls on the EU and its Member States to ensure adequate financial resources for the long- term support of the Syrian refugees in Turkey;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls the important role played by Turkey in responding to the migration crisis resulting from the war in Syria; takes the view that Turkey’s population has shown great hospitality by offering shelter to more than 3 million Syrian refugees; calls on the EU and its Member States to keep their promise regarding a large-scale resettlement, and to ensure adequate financial resources for the long-term support of Syrian refugees in Turkey; is concerned that the European Court of Auditors on its last report on 13 November 2018 noted that Turkey refused to share information with the EU auditors regarding the details of the expenditures about the spending of €1.1 billion granted by the EU to Turkey to help Syrian refugees and calls on the Commission to put pressure on Turkish government to make the data on the beneficiaries available before granting the next tranche of the assistance, as per Court’s recommendation;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 267 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Reiterates the need to strengthen good neighbourly relations; calls on Turkey, in this connection, to step up efforts to resolve outstanding bilateral issues, including unsettled legal obligations and disputes with its immediate neighbours over land and maritime borders and airspace, in accordance with the provisions of the UN Charter and with international law; calls on the Turkish Government to sign and ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS); urges the Turkish Government to end the repeated violations of Greek airspace and territorial waters, as well as the practice of Turkish military aircraft flying over Greek islands; expresses its regret that the casus belli threat declared by the Turkish Grand National Assembly against Greece has not yet been withdrawn;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 276 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on Turkey to further align its foreign policy with that of the EU in accordance with provisions of the Negotiating Framework;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 277 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on Turkey to further align its foreign policy with that of the EU in accordance with the provisions of the Negotiating Framework;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 278 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Calls on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the construction of the Akkuyu nuclear power plant; points out that the envisaged site is located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, hence posing a major threat not only to Turkey, but also to the Mediterranean region; requests, accordingly, that the Turkish Government join the Espoo Convention, which commits its parties to notifying and consulting each other on major projects under consideration that are likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact across boundaries; asks, to this end, the Turkish Government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries, such as Greece and Cyprus, in relation to any further developments in the Akkuyu venture;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 283 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Calls on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the construction of the Akkuyu nuclear power plant; requests that the Turkish Government join the Espoo Convention; asks the Turkish Government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries, such as Greece and Cyprus, during any further developments in the Akkuyu venture;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 284 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Calls on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the construction of the Akkuyu nuclear power plant; requests that the Turkish Government join the Espoo Convention; asks the Turkish Government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries, such as Greece and Cyprus, during any further developments in the Akkuyu venture;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 285 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18 c. Reiterates its call on Turkey to fulfil its obligation of full, non- discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus; regrets that Turkey has still not made progress towards the normalization of its relations with the Republic of Cyprus; reiterates that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process and calls for progress without any further delay;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 287 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18 c. Calls on Turkey to cooperate with relevant international organizations, especially the Council of Europe, in preventing and combatting illicit trafficking and the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage within Turkey and the occupied part of Cyprus;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 289 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 d (new)
18 d. Reiterates its call on Turkey to comply with the EU declaration issued on September 21, 2005 and to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus, regrets that Turkey has still not made progress towards the normalization of its relations with the Republic of Cyprus; reiterates that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process, of Customs Union and of every agreement between the EU and Turkey and calls for progress without any further delay;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 290 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 e (new)
18 e. Recalls its position adopted in the report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy in 2017 about the importance of ensuring the coherence of EU policy as regards situations involving the occupation or annexation of territory; recalls, in this regard, that the immediate withdrawal of Turkish occupation forces and the full restoration of the sovereignty of the Republic of Cyprus, in line with the UNSC resolutions, should be the first step for achieving a long-term political solution, guaranteeing the well-being, security and democratic rights of all Cypriots;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 292 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes theRegrets that the International Conference held in Crans Montana with the guarantor powers and the participation of the EU failed to lead to a democratic settlement due to the Turkish policy which refuses to fully withdraw its troops from Cyprus and negate the anachronistic Treaty of Guarantors; regrets that the Turkish policy is in conflict with the EU values and principles; calls upon Turkey to immediately recognise the Republic of Cyprus and fully respect and implement the declaration issued by the EU on September 21, 2005; welcomes efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive, democratic and viable settlement in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the EU acquis, the EU acquis and the values and principles upon which the EU is founded; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to begin withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Personscity of Famagusta to its lawful inhabitants without further delay, as the relevant UN Security Council Resolution 550 (1984) provides for, and calls upon Turkey to immediately end its policy of illegal colonization at the occupied in Northern part of the Republic of Cyprus, which is contrary to the Geneva Convention and to the principles of International law; calls on Turkey to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons and calls on Turkey to allow unconditional access to military zones and all relevant sites and to provide relevant information from its military and other archives, thus maximising the effectiveness of the excavations conducted by the CMP; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action within or outside the Exclusive Economic Zone of Cyprus which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 295 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the EU acquis; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to begin withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone, explore and exploit its natural resources and calls on Turkey to respect relevant international law (UNCLOS); urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations; urges Turkey to show restraint and to respect Cyprus’ sovereignty over its territorial sea and Cyprus’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone; deeply regrets recent statements by Turkey in this regard;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 296 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the EU acquis; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to beginimmediately withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed- off area of Famagusta to the UN, and its lawful inhabitants, in accordance with UNSC Resolution550(1984), as an effort to pave the way for a democratic comprehensive settlement and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relationreiterates its calls on Turkey to respect the sovereign rights of all Member States, including those relating to the exploration and exploitation of natural resources when in line with the EU acquis and international law; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action damaging good neighbourly relations and a climate conducive to the peaceful settlement of bilateral disputes;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 297 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlementsettlement based on a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, a single international legal personality, single sovereignty and single citizenship with political equality between the two communities, in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and, the EU acquis, and on the basis of respect for the principles on which the Union is founded; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to begin withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN and its lawful inhabitants in accordance with UNSC Resolution 550 (1984), as an effort to pave the way for a democratic comprehensive settlement, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 300 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the EU acquis; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to begin withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations; and underlines that recognition of all Member States is a fundamental component of the EU- Turkish relations;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 301 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, international law and the EU acquis; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to beginimmediately withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons; recognisVarosha to its lawful inhabitants in accordance with UNSC resolution 550 (1984) as an effort to pave the way for a democratic comprehensive settlement, and echoes the rightesults of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relationsFact-finding Visit by the Committee on Petitions to Famagusta; urges Turkey to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island through its policy of illegal settlement;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 304 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Calls upon the Turkish government to halt the construction of the Akkuyu nuclear plant; points out that the envisaged site is located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, hence posing a major threat not only to Turkey but to the Mediterranean region as a whole; accordingly, requests that the Turkish government join the Espoo Convention, which commits parties to notifying and consulting each other on major projects under consideration that are likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact across boundaries; to this end, asks the Turkish government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries, such as Greece and Cyprus, during any further developments in the Akkuyu venture;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 308 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons and calls on Turkey to allow unconditional and full access to military zones and all relevant sites and to provide relevant information from its military and other archives, thus maximising the effectiveness of the excavations conducted by the CMP;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 309 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Deplores Turkey's refusal to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement vis-a-vis all member states, including the Republic of Cyprus;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 310 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Urges Turkey to show restraint and to respect Cyprus’ sovereignty over its territorial sea and Cyprus’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone; deeply regrets recent statements by Turkey in this regard;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 314 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Underlines the lawful right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone, explore and exploit its natural resources and reiterates its calls on Turkey to show restraint, to refrain from any further threat or action and to respect Cyprus’ sovereignty over its territorial sea and Cyprus’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone; expresses serious concern over Turkey's renewed threats and provocations; urges Turkey to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 315 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Deplores Turkey's policy of settlement and calls on Turkey to refrain from further settlement of Turkish citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus, which is contrary to the Geneva Convention and the principles of international law; urges Turkey to terminate all actions that alter the demographic balance on the island thus impeding a future solution;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 317 #

2018/2150(INI)

19 c. Calls on Turkey to sign and ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which has been signed and ratified by the EU and its 28 Member States, without further delay; reiterates its call on Turkey to respect the sovereignty and sovereign rights of Member States over their territorial sea and airspace and their lawful right to enter into bilateral agreements and to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with the EU acquis and international law, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 318 #

2018/2150(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 d (new)
19 d. Reiterates relevant ECtHR decisions and calls on the Turkish Government to immediately stop the violation of the human rights of the Cypriot citizens and stop depriving them of the enjoyment and exercise of their property, religious and other human rights stemming from the constitutional order of the Republic of Cyprus and the acquis communautaire, as well as the fundamental principles and values of the EU;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #

2018/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the International Law and rules-based world order is being increasingly challenged both at the political-military level and, more recently, at the commercial-economic one; notes that these systemic challenges are being accompanied by the continuous deterioration of the international environment confronted with interstate conflicts, natural disasters, terrorism, state failure and hybrid attacks on the foundational pillars of our societies;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2018/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that appropriate investment in security and defence is a matter of urgency for the Member States and the EU and that defence solidarity and cooperation should become the norm, as outlined in the EU Global Strategy (EUGS); welcomes the progress achieved so far in the implementation of the security and defence provisions of the EU Global Strategy; believes that these achievements open the perspective for important structural changes in the future;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 231 #

2018/2099(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Welcomes the main pillars of the new EU-NATO declaration adopted at the NATO Summit in Brussels on 12 July 2018; while recognising the tangible results in the implementation of the 74 common actions, believes that further efforts are needed with regard to the practical implementation of the many commitments already made; notes in particular the involvement of the European Defence Agency (EDA) in the implementation of 30 actions;
2018/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the report XXX of the European Parliament on the current situation and future prospects for the sheep and goat sectors in the EU,
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 34 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the report XXX of the European Parliament on the current situation and future prospects for the sheep and goat sectors in the EU,
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 35 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 b (new)
– having regard to the recommendations of the EU Sheep Meat Forum, held in 2015 and 2016, under the aegis of the European Commission,
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 36 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 b (new)
– having regard to the recommendations of the EU Sheep Meat Forum, held in 2015 and 2016, under the aegis of the European Commission,
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 115 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas such a new delivery model should ensure a direct relationship between the EU and European farmers;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 116 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas such a new delivery model should ensure a direct relationship between the EU and European farmers;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 127 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas direct payments provide the first substantial layer of stability and a safety net to farm incomes as they represent from a tangible portion of annual farming incomes to as much as 100% of farm revenues in certain regions and should continue to allow farmers to compete on a level playing field with third countries;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 128 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas direct payments provide the first substantial layer of stability and a safety net to farm incomes as they represent from a tangible portion of annual farming incomes to as much as 100% of farm revenues in certain regions and should continue to allow farmers to compete on a level playing field with third countries;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 132 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas direct payments must be more targeted to farmers, as those who contribute to the stability and the future of our rural regions and who face economic market risks;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 133 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas direct payments must be more targeted to farmers, as those who contribute to the stability and the future of our rural regions and who face economic market risks;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 143 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas specific tools for Mediterranean sectors should remain in the first pillar;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 144 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas specific tools for Mediterranean sectors should remain in the first pillar;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 152 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas sectorial strategies for fruits and vegetables, wine and apiculture should remain compulsory for the producing countries and the specificities of these tools and rules should be kept;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 153 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas sectorial strategies for fruits and vegetables, wine and apiculture should remain compulsory for the producing countries and the specificities of these tools and rules should be kept;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 222 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the application of the CAP framework in the Outermost Regions should fully explore the scope of Article 349 of the TFUE that should be used in its entirety;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 223 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the application of the CAP framework in the Outermost Regions should fully explore the scope of Article 349 of the TFUE that should be used in its entirety;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 246 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas direct investment support should be better targeted to the dual demands of economic and environmental performance and consider the needs of the farms themselves;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 247 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas direct investment support should be better targeted to the dual demands of Economic and environmental performance and consider the needs of the farms themselves;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 287 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas the objectives of the Cork 2.0 Declaration for a Better Life in Rural Areas stipulate vibrant rural areas, multi- functionality, biodiversity in and outside agriculture and forestry, rare animal breeds and conservation crops, as well as organic agriculture, less-favoured areas and commitments in the context of Natura 2000, the role of young people and women in rural development;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 288 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas the objectives of the Cork 2.0 Declaration for a Better Life in Rural Areas stipulate vibrant rural areas, multi- functionality, biodiversity in and outside agriculture and forestry, rare animal breeds and conservation crops, as well as organic agriculture, less-favoured areas and commitments in the context of Natura 2000, the role of young people and women in rural development;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 301 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas the CAP should give due recognition to the strong environmental benefits provided by certain sectors, like sheep and goat or protein crops;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 302 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas the CAP should give due recognition to the strong environmental benefits provided by certain sectors, like sheep and goat or protein crops;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 307 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M b (new)
Mb. whereas in the framework of the global EU strategy on forest, special attention should be paid to the Mediterranean forests, which suffer more from climate change and fires, putting at risk potential for agricultural production and biodiversity;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 308 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M b (new)
Mb. whereas in the framework of the global EU strategy on forest, special attention should be paid to the Mediterranean forests, which suffer more from climate change and fires, putting at risk potential for agricultural production and biodiversity;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 388 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Believes that any renationalisation attempts of the CAP, via co-financing of the first pillar or disproportionate use of the subsidiary principle, must be avoided as it would lead to much worst imbalances for competition in the single market;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 389 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Believes that any renationalisation attempts of the CAP, via co-financing of the first pillar or disproportionate use of the subsidiary principle, must be avoided as it would lead to much worst imbalances for competition in the single market;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 413 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that subsidiarity for Member States should only be granted within a strong common set of rules and tools agreed at EU level as part of a uniform approach to all programming efforts and eligibility criteria, should cover both of the CAP’s pillars and ensure, in particular, a European approach in Pillar I and thus a level playing field;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 430 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that farmers should be allowed to select, among those European tools, the most effective ways and means of achieving the goals set at EU level;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 431 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that farmers should be allowed to select, among those European tools, the most effective ways and means of achieving the goals set at EU level;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 478 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to ensurbe in charge of the that financial and performance control and audit functions are performed towith the aim of warranting the same standard and under the same criteria across all Member States, irrespective of enhanced flexibility for Member States in programme design and management, and with a view, in particular, to ensuring a timely disbursement of funds across Member States to all eligible famers;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 503 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that POSEI programs for outermost regions and the specific regime for Aegian Islands should be kept separated from the general EU direct payments scheme, since those regions face specific challenges due to their remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate or economic dependence on few products;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 506 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that POSEI programmes for outermost regions and programmes for small Aegean should be kept separated from the general EU direct payments scheme, since those regions face specific challenges due to their remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate or economic dependence on few products;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 574 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Is of the opinion that administrative burden in the Rural Development programs should be eliminated, and the current long approval procedure should be reviewed to avoid delaying the application of those programs in each multiannual financial framework.
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 575 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Is of the opinion that administrative burden in the Rural Development programs should be eliminated, and the current long approval procedure should be reviewed to avoid delaying the application of those programs in each multiannual financial framework.
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 585 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Considers that the development of new EU policies and objectives must not be done to the detriment of a successful CAP;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 590 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Considers that those delays strongly reduce the effectiveness of the programs and create huge uncertainty to European farmers;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 594 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Considers that those delays strongly reduce the effectiveness of the programs and create huge uncertainty to European farmers;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 595 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Considers that New rural Development lines, which are not matched with extra funds, should be avoided;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 596 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Considers that NEW rural Development lines, which are not matched with extra funds, should be avoided;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 597 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Considers that the development of new EU policies and objectives must not be done to the detriment of a successful CAP;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 676 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls foronsiders that the existing system for calculating direct payments in Pillar I, which is often based on historic entitlements, tocould be replaced by an EU-wideon a voluntary basis by national uniform methods of calculating payments, in order to make the system simpler and more transparent;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 677 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls foronsiders that the existing system for calculating direct payments in Pillar I, which is often based on historic entitlements, tocould be replaced by an EU-wideon a voluntary basis by national uniform methods of calculating payments, in order to make the system simpler and more transparent;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 701 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Considers that Member States should keep the prerogative to adapt the CAP payments to their specific needs.
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 702 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Considers that Member States should keep the prerogative to adapt the CAP payments to their specific needs;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 738 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses the need for a fairNotes that the distribution of direct payments between Member States, which must take into account socio-economic differences, such as different production costs and the amounts received by Member Stateincomes, types of farming, size of farms uander Pillar II different production costs;
2018/03/22
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 774 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that, provided that a level playing field in the single market can be guaranteed, voluntary coupled support (VCS) payments should be maintained, as a tool to counteract specific difficulties, particularly those arising from the structural competitive disadvantage of less- favoured and mountainous regions, as well as those which are more temporary in nature and arise from a shift away from the old entitlement scheme, for example;.
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 796 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Believes that VCS payments should, under precise and limited conditions, support sectors, especially livestock production, in regions where other policy tools are not available or are less efficient;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 801 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Notes the importance and value of VCS for many Member States for specific sectors and types of farming;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 805 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Special support for mountain areas, islands, outermost regions, and other less favoured areas should be maintained while special treatment should be granted to farmers who have extra costs due to specific constraints linked to high value natural areas;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 806 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Special support for mountain areas, islands, outermost regions, and other less favoured areas should be maintained while special treatment should be granted to farmers who have extra costs due to specific constraints linked to high value natural areas;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 812 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 c (new)
14c. Considers that generational renewal is one of the key challenges of the farming sector in the EU and should be one of the main crosscutting objectives of the next reform;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 814 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 c (new)
14c. Considers that generational renewal is one of the key challenges of the farming sector in the EU and should be one of the main crosscutting objectives of the next reform;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 856 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses that better support should be given to young farmers since the current second-pillar start up support is not always efficient and does not encompass investment support;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 859 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses that better support should be given to young farmers since the current second-pillar start-up support is not always efficient and does not encompass investment support;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 866 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Considers that financial instruments of the second pillar should also be further mobilised to support the entry of young farmers in the sector;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 867 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Considers that financial instruments of the second pillar should also be further mobilised to support the entry of young farmers in the sector;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 869 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Supports initiatives aimed at promoting succession planning, facilitating and encouraging collaborative arrangements, such as partnerships, shared farming, contract rearing and leasing between old and young farmers;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 870 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Supports initiatives aimed at promoting succession planning, facilitating and encouraging collaborative arrangements, such as partnerships, shared farming, contract rearing and leasing between old and young farmers;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 873 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 d (new)
15d. Believes that an effective exit scheme, allowing old farmers to retire and young farmers to entry into the sector should be introduced to reach effectively the objective of generational renewal;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 874 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 d (new)
15d. Believes that an effective exit scheme, allow old farmers to retire and young farmers to entry into the sector should be introduced to reach effectively the objective of generational renewal;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 883 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the importance of rural development, including the LEADER initiative, in supporting multi-functional agriculture and in fostering additional entrepreneurial activities and opportunities, in order to generate income from agri- tourism, and to secure community- supported agriculture and the provision of social services in rural areaforestry and in fostering the investments and innovation, additional entrepreneurial activities and opportunities, enhancing the provision of environmental and climate actions;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 884 #

2018/2037(INI)

16. Underlines the importance of rural development, including the LEADER initiative, in supporting multi-functional agriculture and in fostering additional entrepreneurial activities and opportunities, in order to generate income from agri- tourism, and to secure community- supported agriculture and the provision of social services in rural areaforestry and in fostering the investments and innovation, additional entrepreneurial activities and opportunities, enhancing the provision of environmental and climate actions;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 906 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Underlines that rural development provides opportunities in order to generate income from agri-tourism, and to secure community-supported agriculture and forestry, the provision of social services in rural areas;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 908 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Underlines that rural development provides opportunities to generate income from agri-tourism, and to secure community-supported agriculture and forestry, the provision of social services in rural areas;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 957 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Underlines that Mediterranean EU regions are more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, such as drought, fires and desertification, so greater efforts will be required by farmers in these areas to adapt their activities to the altered environment;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 960 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Underlines that Mediterranean EU regions are more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, such as drought, fires and desertification, so greater efforts will be required by farmers in these areas to adapt their activities to the altered environment;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 974 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Underlines that such efforts should be reflected and supported in the CAP policy framework, as climatic cohesion should be transversal to all common policies;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 975 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Underlines that such efforts should be reflected and supported in the CAP policy framework, as climatic cohesion should be transversal to all common policies;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1007 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Recalls that some challenges, such as climate change, biodiversity and water management, go beyond the CAP and serve other policy objectives;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1008 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Recalls that some challenges, such as climate change, biodiversity and water management, go beyond the CAP and serve other policy objectives;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1015 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Recalls that their funding should also be ensured by other instruments;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1016 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Recalls that their funding should also be ensured by other instruments;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1018 #

2018/2037(INI)

18c. Considers that the greater use of field residues as a renewable, efficient and sustainable source of energy for rural areas should be supported and promoted;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1019 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Considers that the greater use of field residues as a renewable, efficient and sustainable source of energy for rural areas should be supported and promoted;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1050 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Considers that the revision of the Single Common Market Organisation (SCMO) should not be detached from the proposals on the new delivery model, as it is still necessary to improve the mechanisms in place to deal with crises and to reinforce the role played by farmers in the food chain;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1103 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Insists on maintaining the fruits and vegetables regime under the current rules, which are based on the application of operational programs by the Producer Organisations and the absence of dedicated national envelopes, and also on maintaining the EU current marketing standards in fruits and vegetables;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1104 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Insists on maintaining the fruits and vegetables regime under the current rules, which are based on the application of operational programs by the Producer Organizations and the absence of dedicated national envelopes. The EU current marketing standards in fruits and vegetables should be maintained.
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1111 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Recalls that management systems should be reinforced, mainly in fruits and vegetables, wine and olive oil.
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1112 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Recalls that management systems should be reinforced, mainly in fruits and vegetables, wine and olive oil;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1116 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Calls for the introduction of a new self-help management tool for olive oil that would allow storage action in those years where there is an overproduction, to release it in the market when the production is below the demand;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1117 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Calls for the introduction of a new self-help management tool for olive oil that would allow storage action in those years where there is an overproduction, to release it in the market when the production is below the demand;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1121 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20d. Recalls that management systems should be reinforced, mainly in fruits and vegetables, wine and olive oil.
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1150 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls for better support to be given to increase the leguminous plant productions in the EU and for specific aids for extensive sheep and goat breeders, taking into consideration the positive impact on the environment of those sectors and the need to reduce the EU dependency on imports of proteins for feed;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1151 #

2018/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls for better support to be given to increase the leguminous plant productions in the EU and for specific aids for extensive sheep and goat breeders, taking into consideration the positive impact on the environment of those sectors and the need to reduce the EU dependency on imports of proteins for feed;
2018/03/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2 #

2018/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,
2018/03/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #

2018/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) to ensure that EU funds are effectively deployed in development projects that help the Libyan population and civil society and that adequate support is provided to municipalities in their provision of essential services and in building local governance, so as to ensure basic living standards for the peopulationle and the potential of a stable and developing society; to ensure coordination between central authorities and local municipalities in order to identify the priorities to invest in and to ensure that the European industry will be fully involved in the reconstruction of Libya; to promote projects that foster locally embedded dialogue and conflict-resolution mechanisms, involving young people in particular; to ensure the money under the EU Emergency Trust Fund is only granted when accompanied by a sound analysis of local authorities and recipients;
2018/03/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 112 #

2018/2017(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) to further encourage the Libyan authorities and institutions to work towards improving the living conditions of all Libyans, and to implement the necessary financial and economic reforms requested by the international financial institutions to help economic recovery and stabilisation; to urge the Libyan authorities to ensure that natural resources are exploited for the benefit of the whole population, including at the local level; to urge the Libyan authorities to ratify the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea and proceed with delimiting its maritime zones according to it; to help the Libyan authorities to fight against the criminalisation of the economy;
2018/03/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #

2018/0247(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The enlargement process is built on established criteria and fair and rigorous conditionality. Each beneficiary is assessed on the basis of its own merits. The assessment of progress achieved and the identification of shortcomings aim to provide incentives and guidance to the beneficiaries listed in Annex I to pursue the necessary far-reaching reforms. For the prospect of enlargement to become a reality, a firm commitment to the principle of the 'fundamentals first'15 remains essential. Progression towards accession depends on each applicant's respect for the Union's values and its capacity to undertake the necessary reforms to align its political, institutional, legal, administrative and economic systems with the rules, standards, policies and practices in the Union. In addition, the Negotiating Framework of each and every candidate country conducting the accession negotiations sets out clear requirements against which progress in the accession negotiations is being measured. _________________ 15 The 'fundamentals first' approach links rule of law and fundamental rights with the two other crucial areas of the accession process: economic governance – strengthened focus on economic development and improved competitiveness – and the strengthening of democratic institutions and public administration reform. Each of the three fundamentals is of crucial importance for the reform processes in the candidate countries and potential candidates and addresses key concerns of the citizens.
2018/11/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2018/0247(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The enlargement process is built on established criteria and fair and rigorous conditionality. Each beneficiary is assessed on the basis of its own merits. The assessment of progress achieved and the identification of shortcomings aim to provide incentives and guidance to the beneficiaries listed in Annex I to pursue the necessary far-reaching reforms. For the prospect of enlargement to become a reality, a firm commitment to the principle of the 'fundamentals first'15 remains essential. Furthermore, good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation are also essential elements of the enlargement process. Progression towards accession depends on each applicant's respect for the Union's values and its capacity to undertake the necessary reforms to align its political, institutional, legal, administrative and economic systems with the rules, standards, policies and practices in the Union. _________________ 15 The 'fundamentals first' approach links The 'fundamentals first' approach links rule of law and fundamental rights with the two other crucial areas of the accession process: economic governance – strengthened focus on economic development and improved competitiveness – and the strengthening of democratic institutions and public administration reform. Each of the three fundamentals is of crucial importance for the reform processes in the candidate countries and potential candidates and addresses key concerns of the citizens.
2018/11/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 174 #

2018/0247(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) To support territorial and cross- border cooperation, including across maritime borders.
2018/11/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 378 #

2018/0247(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The following list of key performance indicators shall be used to help measure the Union’s contribution to the achievement of its specific objectives and the progress made by the beneficiaries:
2018/11/29
Committee: AFET
Amendment 802 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the partners’ commitments and performance, including those jointly agreed with the Union, and efforts, established on the basis of criteria such as political reform and economic and social development;, progress in good governance and human rights and economic and social development, the effective use of aid and compliance with rules and obligations concerning migration management, including as regards cooperation on readmission of irregular migrants.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 1149 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part A – point 4 – point h
(h) Promoting integrated and sustainable management of water resources and transboundary water cooperation in accordance with international law;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 1151 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part A – point 4 – point k
(k) Supporting ocean governance, including the protection and restoration preservation of coastal and marine areas in all its forms, including ecosystems, the fight against marine litter, the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing and the protection of maritime biodiversity in accordance with the UNCLOS;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 1206 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part A – point 6 – point h
(h) Promoting transboundary cooperation regarding the sustainable management of shared natural resources in accordance with the UNCLOS;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 299 #

2018/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 63 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 12% of the total area actually planted with vines in their territory, as measured on 31 July of the previous year; or (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02013R1308-(This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.) Or. en 20180101&from=FR)
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 302 #

2018/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 63 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) 12% of an area comprising the area actually planted with vines in their territory, as measured on 31 July 2015, and the area covered by planting rights granted to producers in their territory in accordance with Article 85h, Article 85i or Article 85k of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 and available for conversion into authorisations on 1 January 2016, as referred to in Article 68 of this Regulation.; (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02013R1308-(This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.) Or. en 20180101&from=FR)
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 439 #

2018/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 119 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(aa) In Article 119, paragraph 1, the following point is added: (ga) the nutrition declaration of which the content may be limited to energy value and sugar addition
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 716 #

2018/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 15 – point 1
Those implementing acts shall be adopted without applying the examination procedure referred to in Article 57(2).;deleted
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 727 #

2018/0218(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 49 – Paragraph 8
8. The Member State shall inform the Commission without delay if any procedure is initiated before a national cdeleted (This amendment applies throughourt or other national body concerning an application lodged with the Commission, in accordance with paragraph 4.the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 465 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The Common Agriculture Policy continues to play a key role in the development of the European Union’s rural areas and the level of self- sufficiency of EU citizens is to a large extent dependent on it. It is therefore necessary to attempt to slow down the gradual abandonment of agricultural activity by keeping a CAP that is strong, with adequate resources, to mitigate the depopulation of rural areas and to continue meeting consumer expectations in terms of the environment, food safety and animal welfare. In view of the challenges faced by EU producers in responding to new regulatory requirements and a higher level of environmental ambition, against a background of price volatility and EU borders that are more open to imports from third countries, it is appropriate to keep the CAP budget at least at the same level as during the 2014-2020 period.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 473 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Since the CAP needs to sharpen its responses to the challenges and opportunities as they manifest themselves at Union, international, national, regional, local and farm levels, it is necessary to streamline the governance of the CAP and improve its delivery on the Union objectives and to significantly decrease the administrative burden on beneficiaries. In the CAP based on delivery of performance (‘delivery model’), the Union should set the basic policy parameters, such as objectives of the CAP and basiccommon requirements, while Member States should bear greater responsibility as to how they meet the objectives and achieve targets. Enhanced subsidiarity makes it possible to better take into account local conditions and needs, tailoring the support to maximise the contribution to Union objectives. Nevertheless, in order to ensure that such subsidiarity does not translate into a renationalisation of the CAP, this Regulation must include a strong body of European Union provisions designed to prevent the distortion of competition and ensure non- discriminatory treatment for all Community farmers throughout EU territory.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 538 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) In order to give substance to the objectives of the CAP as established by Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as well as to ensure that the Union adequately addresses its most recent challenges, it is appropriate to provide for a set of general objectives reflecting the orientations given in the Communication on ‘The Future of Food and Farming’. A set of specific objectives should be further defined at Union level and applied by the Member States in their CAP Strategic Plans. While striking a balance across the dimensions of sustainable development, in line with the impact assessment, these specific objectives should translate the general objectives of the CAP into more concrete priorities and take into account relevant Union legislation, particularly with regard to climate, energy and environment. The CAP must expressly take into consideration the European Union’s equality policy, paying particular attention to the need to boost the participation of women in the development of the socio-economic fabric of rural areas. This Regulation should contribute to making women’s work more visible, and therefore it should be taken into account within the specific objectives to be addressed by Member States in their strategic plans.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 746 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The CAP should ensure that Member States increase the environmental delivery by respecting local needs and farmers' actual circumstances. Member States should under direct payments in the CAP Strategic Plan set up Eco-schemes voluntary for farmers, which should be fully coordinated with the other relevant interventions. They should be defined by the Member States as a payment granted either for incentivising and remunerating the provision of public goods by agricultural practices beneficial to the environment and climate or as a compensation for the introduction of these practices. In both cases they should aim at enhancing the environmental and climate performance of the CAP and should consequently be conceived to go beyond the mandatory requirements already prescribed by the system of conditionality. Member States may decide to set up eco- schemes forto promote production models that are beneficial for the environment, particularly extensive livestock rearing, and to promote all kinds of agricultural practices such as, among other measures, the enhanced management of permanent pastures and, landscape features, and organic farming. These schemes may also includeenvironmental certification schemes, such as organic farming, integrated production or conservation agriculture. These schemes may include measures of a type other than rural development environmental and climate commitments, as well as measures of the same type that may be classified as ‘entry-level schemes’ which may be a condition for taking up more ambitious rural development commitments.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 925 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
(49) In order to facilitate the management of EAFRD funds, a singlegeneral contribution rate for support from the EAFRD should be set in relation to public expenditure in the Member States. In order to take account of their particular importance or nature, specific contribution rates should be set in relation to certain types of operations. In order to mitigate the specific constraints resulting from the level of development, the remoteness and insularity, an appropriate higher EAFRD contribution rate should be set for less developed regions, the outermost regions referred to in Article 349 TFEU and the smaller Aegean islands as defined in Article 1(2)of Regulation (EU) No 229/2013.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1051 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 76
(76) Mechanisms should be in place to take action to protect the Union’s financial interests in case the CAP Strategic Plan implementation deviates significantly from the targets set. Member States may thus be asked to submit action plans in case of significant and non-justified underperformance. This could lead to suspensions and, in the end, reductions of the Union funds if the planned results are not achieved. Moreover, an overall performance bonus is established as part of the incentive mechanism based on allocating the performance bonus, in view of encouraging good environmental and climate performances.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1064 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 87
(87) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation and to avoid unfair competition or discrimination between farmers, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the fixing of reference areas for the support for oilseeds, rules for the authorisation of land and varieties for the purposes of the crop- specific payment for cotton and related notifications, the calculation of the reduction where the eligible area of cotton exceeds the base area, the Union financial assistance for distillation of by-products of wine-making, the annual breakdown by Member State of the total amount of Union support for types of interventions for rural development, rules on the presentation of the elements to be included in the CAP Strategic Plan, rules on the procedure and time limits for the approval of CAP Strategic Plans and the submission and approval of requests for amendment of CAP Strategic Plans, uniform conditions for the application of the information and publicity requirements relating to the possibilities offered by the CAP Strategic Plans, rules relating to the performance, monitoring and evaluation framework, rules for the presentation of the content of the annual performance report, rules on the information to be sent by the Member States for the performance assessment by the Commission and rules on the data needs and synergies between potential data sources, and arrangements to ensure a consistent approach for determining the attribution of the performance bonus to Member States. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.22 _________________ 22 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1148 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) 'agricultural activity' shall be defined in a way that it includes both the production of agricultural products listed in Annex I to the TFEU, including cotton and short rotation coppice, and maintenance of the agricultural area in a state which makes it suitable for grazing or cultivation, without preparatory action going beyond usual agricultural methods and machineries;
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1450 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) promote employment, growth, social inclusion, the participation of women in the rural economy and local development in rural areas, including bio- economy and sustainable forestry;
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1538 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 138 amending Annex I to adapt the common output, result and impact indicators to take into account the experience with their application and, where needed, to add new indicators.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1575 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that the interventions based onOnce the strategic plan has been approved by the European Commission, it shall be deemed that the types of interventions which are listed in Annex II to this Regulation, including the definitions set out in Article 3 and the definitions to be formulated in the CAP Strategic Plans set out in Article 4, respect the provisions of paragraph 1 of Annex 2 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1584 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the interventions based on the crop- specific payment for cotton provided for in Subsection 2 of Section 3 of Chapter II of this Title respect the provisions of Article 6(5) of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.deleted
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1661 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall establish a system for providing the Farm Sustainability Tool for Nutrients referred to in Annex III, with the minimum content and functionalities defined therein, to beneficiaries, who shall use the Tool.deleted
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1682 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Farmers satisfying the requirements laid down in Regulation 2018/848 on organic agriculture will, in doing so, comply with rules 1, 8 and 9 on good agricultural and environmental condition laid down in Annex III to this Regulation.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1699 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. The outermost regions of the Union, defined pursuant to Article 349 TFEU and the smaller Aegean islands as defined in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 229/2013, shall be exempt from good agricultural and environmental condition requirements1, 2, 8 and 9, laid down in Annex III to this Regulation.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2130 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(b a) In the case of points (a) and (b) Member States may give priority to women with a view to helping to meet the objective referred to in Article 6(1)(h).
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2310 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall support under this type of intervention genuine farmers who make commitments to observe, on eligible hectares, agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment. These measures shall aim to preserve and promote the necessary changes to practices that make a positive contribution to the environment and climate.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2412 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 5 – point c a (new)
(ca) meet the requirements laid down in points (a), (b) and (c) and contribute to the maintenance of practices that are beneficial for the environment, in particular extensive livestock rearing.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2442 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Support for eco-schemes shall take the form of an annual payment per eligible hectare or per farm and it shall be granted as either:
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2465 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 8
8. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 138 supplementing this Regulation with further rules on the eco-schemes.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2589 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) other sectors referred to in points (a) to (h), (k), (m), (o) to (t) and (w) of Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, as well as protein crops, potatoes, rabbits, cotton and Equidae.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2792 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 7 – point a
(a) at least 210% of expenditure under operational programs covers the interventions linked to the objectives referred to in points (d) and (e) of Article 42;
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2797 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 7 – point b
(b) at least 5% of expenditure under operational programs covers the intervention linked to the objective referred to in point (c) of Article 42;deleted
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2923 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 4
4. The Union financial assistance to the interventions referred to in paragraph 2 shall be maximum 750% of the expenditure. The remaining part of the expenditure shall be borne by the Member States.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3296 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) thematic sub-programmes in favour of rural women.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3810 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall limit the support to a maximum of 75The maximum support shall be 100% of the eligible costs.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3818 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 4
4. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, in outermost regions, the smaller Aegean islands and other duly justified cases Member States may apply a higher rate or a higher amount than that set in in that paragraph to achieve the specific objectives set out in Article 6.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3827 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 a (new)
Article 72 a Measures in favour of rural women. Member States may establish a thematic subprogramme in favour of rural women within their strategic plans. Such a subprogramme must meet the objectives referred to in Article 6(1).
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3829 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 b (new)
Article 72 b Support to prevent and mitigate damage caused by attacks by predator species 1. Member States may, under the conditions laid down in this Article, support the introduction of measures to protect livestock farms and crops from attacks by predator species or other species and compensate producers for losses deriving from those attacks. 2. Member States shall provide total or partial compensation for the additional costs and loss of income taking place as a result of the prevention measures or the casualties to herds or crops as a result of these attacks. 3. Member States shall define the types of loss as well as the preventive measures that will be covered by the compensation referred to in paragraph 2.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3832 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Managing Authority of the CAP Strategic Plan or other designated intermediate bodies shall define selection criteria for interventions relating to the following types of interventions: investments, installation of young farmers and new farmers, rural business start-up, cooperation, knowledge exchange and information, specific measures in favour rural women, after consultation of the Monitoring Committee referred to in Article 111. Selection criteria shall aim to ensure equal treatment of applicants, better use of financial resources and targeting of the support in accordance with the purpose of the interventions. Beneficiaries will be selected on the basis of calls for proposals, applying effective economic, social and environmental criteria.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3923 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 7085% of the eligible public expenditure in the outermost regions and in the smaller Aegean islands within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 229/2013;
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3942 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 7085% of the eligible public expenditure in the less developed regions;
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3953 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) 675% of the eligible expenditure for payments under Article 66;
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 3967 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 85 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) 453% of the eligible public expenditure in the other regions.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 4016 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
At least 30% of the total EAFRD contribution to the CAP Strategic Plan as set out in Annex IX shall be reserved for interventions of all types addressing the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives set out in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1) of this Regulation, excluding interventions based on Article 66.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 4101 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
By way of derogation fromThe percentage referred to in the first sub- paragraph, Member States that in accordance with Article 53(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 used for the purpose of voluntary coupled support more than 13% of their annual national ceiling set out in Annex II to that Regulation, may decide to use for the purpose of coupled incommay be increased by a maximum of 2 %, provided that the amount corresponding to the percentage exceeding the 13% is allocated to the support mfore than 10% of the amount set out in Annex VII. The resulting percentage shall not exceed the percentage approved by the Commission for voluntary coupled support in respect of claim year 2018 protein crops under Subsection 1 of Section 3of Chapter II of Title III.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 4812 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 123
Performance bonus 1. attributed to Member States in the year 2026 to reward satisfactory performance in relation to the environmental and climate targets provided that the Member State concerned has met the condition set out in Article 124(1). 2. equal to 5% of the amount per Member State for financial year 2027 as set out in Annex IX. Resources transferred between the EAGF and the EAFRD under Articles 15 and 90 are excluded for the purpose of calculating the performance bonus.Article 123 deleted A performance bonus may be The performance bonus shall be
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 4844 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 124
Attribution of the performance bonus 1. of the year 2026, the performance bonus withheld from a Member State’s allocation following the second paragraph of Article 123 shall be attributed to this Member State if the result indicators applirticle 124 deleted Based ton the specific environmental- and climate-related objectives set out in points (d), (e) and (f) of Article 6(1) in its CAP Strategic Plan have achieved at least 90% of their target value for the year 2025. 2. months of the receipt of the annual performance report in the year 2026 adopt an implementing act without applyrformance review The Commission shall withing the Committee procedure referred to in Article 139 to decide for each Member State whether the respective CAP Strategic Plans have achieved the target values referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. 3. in paragraph 1 are achieved, the amount of the performance bonus shall be granted by the Commission to the Member States concerned and considered to be definitely allocated to financial year 2027 on the basis of the decision referred to in paragraph 2. 4. in paragraph 1 are not achieved, the commitments for financial year 2027 relating to the amount of the performance bonus of the Member States concerned shall not be granted by the Commission. 5. bonus, the Commission may take into consideration cases of force majeure and serious socio-economic crises impeding the achievement of the relevant milestones. 6. implementing acts laying down the detailed arrangements to ensure a consistent approach for determining the attribution of the performance bonus to Member States. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 139(2).wo Where the target values referred to Where the target values referred to When attributing the performance The Commission shall adopt
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 4911 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 135 – paragraph 2
2. For direct payments granted in the smaller Aegean islands in accordance with Chapter IV of Regulation (EU) No 229/2013 only point (a) and (b) of Article 3(2), Article 4, Section 2 of Chapter I of Title III, Sections 1 and 2 of Chapter II of Title III and Title IX of this Regulation shall apply. Article 4, Section 2 of Chapter I of Title III, Sections 1 and 2 of Chapter II of Title III and Title IX shall apply without any obligations related to the CAP Strategic Plan.
2018/12/10
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 41 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the EU ihas better equippen rather focused ton dealing with internal security and NATO ton manageing external defence; whereas the EU is developing in an accelerated way to bolster its defence;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 241 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes cumbersome procedures in sharing classified information between the two organisations; considers that both organisations share the same strategic challenges and, implicitly, will be dealing with the consequences together; believes that – by building mutual trust – cooperation in the exchange of classified information and intelligence analysis could be improved; is of the opinion that fostering reciprocity and a ‘need-to-share’ approach to intelligence exchange would also benefit missions and operations of both organisations; is of the view that the Parallel and Coordinated Intelligence Assessment could be used in fighting hybrid threats more effectively together;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 253 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers it important to ensure the complementarity and avoid unnecessary duplication of maritime capacity- building efforts in order to safeguard maritime security more efficiently; welcomes increased EU-NATO operational cooperation and coordination in the Mediterranean theatre, including the sharing of maritime information and situational awareness;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 278 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates that the EU initiatives aimed at strengthening European security and defence should also help ensure that those EU Member States which are NATO Allies meet their NATO commitments; stresses that EU Member States should be capable to launch autonomous military missions also where NATO is not willing to act or where EU action is more appropriate;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 321 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Considers that the next EU-NATO Joint Declaration, to be adopted at the upcoming NATO summit in July 2018, should initiate the process of reviewing the ‘Berlin Plus’ arrangements; considers in this context with the aim to ensure the implementation of the principles of inclusiveness, reciprocity and full respect of the decision making autonomy of both organizations, as provided for by the Council Conclusions of December 5, 2017; considers that capabilities developed under PESCO shcould be available for NATO operations and that PESCO projects shcould be opened to non- EU members of NATO, such as Norway and, in view of Brexit, the UK; stresses that the review of ‘Berlin Plus’ should provide the framework of cooperation not only for crisis management but also for ensuring security together on the continent;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 336 #

2017/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Welcomes the successful 2017 parallel and coordinated crisis management exercise, which provided an important platform for sharing best practices; looks forward to lessons learned and its continuation, notably with a view to the next, EU-led exercise planned in 2018;
2018/04/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #

2017/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes it is important to tackle the multiple causes of early and forced marriage, including age-old traditions having little regard for gender equality and women’s affairs, the lack of appropriate educational opportunities and, very often, the endemic poverty in the communities concerned;
2018/03/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 141 #

2017/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls, therefore, on all Member States to be consistent and to include a ban on early and forced marriage in their legislation; also calls on the Member States to cooperate with the civil society in order to coordinate their actions on the issue;
2018/03/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 147 #

2017/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls, therefore, on allthe Member States to be consistent and to include a ban on early and forced marriage in their legislation;
2018/03/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 225 #

2017/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recognises that the European Union, which is committed to upholding fundamental values, including respect for human dignity, must be absolutely irreproachable at Member State level, and calls on the Commission to initiate a wide- ranging awareness-raising campaign and to dedicate a European year to the fight against early and forced marriage; also calls on the European Commission to examine the possibilities of providing an open source with scientifically-approved relevant educational videos, in the form of free Massive Open Online Courses that can be used as supplementary material for any educational system globally;
2018/03/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 227 #

2017/2275(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recognises that the European Union, which is committed to upholding fundamental values, including respect for human dignity, must be absolutely irreproachable at Member State level, and calls on the Commission to initiate a wide- ranging awareness-raising campaign and to dedicate a European year to the fight against early and forced marriage;
2018/03/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas human rights treaties recognise the right of indigenous peoples to their ancestral lands and resources and provide that states must consult indigenous peoples in good faith in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent pertaining to projects that can have a negativedisrupting impact on their traditional ways of life or that can lead to the displacement of their populations;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the collective and individual rights of indigenous peoples continue to be violated in various regions of the world, and as a result they continue to face physical, psychological and sexual violence as well as racism, exclusion, discrimination, forced evictions, destructive settlement, illegalforced expropriation of their traditional domains or deprivation of access to their resources and livelihoods;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas non-binding corporate social responsibility and voluntary regulation schemes have proved insufficientrequire additional efforts in order to protect indigenous and local communities from the violation of their human rights, to prevent land grabbing and to ensure effective corporate accountability;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas a great number of EU- based investors and companies are involved in hundreds of land acquisition operations in Africa, Asia and Latin America, which sometimes leads to violadisruptions of the rightstraditional ways of living of indigenous and local communities; whereas in many cases, given the multiple foreign ramifications of those actors, it can prove difficult to trace their roots directly to the EU and its Member States;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Appeals to all states that have not yet ratified ILO Convention No 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples, and in particular to the EU Member States, to do so as quickly as possible, and calls on the EU to make every effort to supportpromote its ratification and implementation inby all partner countries;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Urges the EU and its Member States to redouble their efforts in order tocontinue working for ensureing the physical integrity and the legal assistance of indigenous, environmental and land rights defenders;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 138 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Invites the Commission to establish a register of EU-based companies that are involved in land grabbing operations in foreign countries, in order to ensure public scrutiny and proactive monitoring of their activity;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 159 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the EU to setlead a global initiative for setting up a grievance mechanism whereby indigenous and local communities can lodge complaints regarding violations and abuses of their rights resulting from EU-based business activities or EU development or investment projects, regardless of the country where the violations and abuses occurred, in order to ensure that the victims have effective access to justice, as well as to technical and legal assistance; calls on the EU and the Member States to engage in the negotiations to adopt a legally binding international human rights instrument for transnational corporations and other companies;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 176 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Invites the EU to urge its partner states to draw up inclusive social policies for indigenous peoples in anthe urban environment, in order to reduce the effects of uprooting and of the mismatch between their traditional capabilities and contemporary metropolitan dynamics;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 180 #

2017/2206(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on all states to commit themselves to ensuring that indigenous peoples have genuine access to health and education, to promoting intercultural public policies, to incorporating indigenous languages and cultures into their school programs or to providing supplementary extracurricular classes and to developing initiatives to raise awareness among civil society of the rights of indigenous peoples and the importance of respecting their beliefs and values in order to tackle prejudice and misinformation;
2018/02/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 139 #

2017/2123(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the willingness of Member States to implementmake binding commitments within the CSDP framework, thereby implementing an ambitious and inclusive Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), and calls for its swift establishment by the Council; underlines that the desired inclusiveness of participation must not compromise either full commitment to the CSDP or a high level of ambition and binding commitments among Member States;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 145 #

2017/2123(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that PESCO should develop within the Union framework and that it should benefit from effective Union support, in full respect of Member States’ competences in defence; renews its call for appropriate PESCO funding to be provided from the Union budget; considers that participation in all Union agencies and bodies falling under the CSDP, including the European Security and Defence College (ESDC), should be made a requirement under PESCO; renews its call for the EU Battle Group System to be brought under PESCO and made eligible for EU funding as far as possible;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 260 #

2017/2123(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Believes that the EU-NATO Joint Declaration has the potential to move cooperation to a higher level; welcomes the common set of 42 proposals aimed at strengthening both cooperation and coordination between the two organisations.This work will be taken forward in the spirit of full openness and transparency, in full respect of the decision-making autonomy and procedures of both organisations and it will be based on the principles of inclusiveness and reciprocity without prejudice to the specific character of the security and defense policy of any Member State; also welcomes the first joint implementation report by the two organisations published in June 2017;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 274 #

2017/2123(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Considers that the EU needs to increase its efforts to act as a regional security provider, and to become a strong European pillar of NATO through the European Defence Uniondevelop a stronger Union in security and defence, which is able to tackle today's threats and challenges more effectively, with the right capabilities, tools and structures to deliver more security for its citizens. As set out in the EUGS, the EU must contribute to: (a) responding to external conflicts and crises (b) building the capabilities of partners, and (c) protecting the Union and its citizens; is of the opinion that the security and protection of Europe will increasingly depend on both organisations; calls for improving cooperation, inter alia concerning the exchange of information and intelligence;
2017/09/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recommends that the support to the ‘Young Farmer Scheme’ should continue and the maximum level of national funding allocation be increased beyond 2 %implement the recent decisions taken in the Omnibus Regulation in order to encourage generational renewal;
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 86 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recommends that the limit placed on access to supports (currently five years from the establishment of the business) should be reviewed in order to encourage generational turnover;deleted
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 129 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform 2014- 2020 introduced new measures to support young farmers in setting up farms; expresses concern however thatthat the level of administrative burdens may be inhibitings the take-up of these measures; notes that the overall administration of the direct payments and Rural Development Programme measures is perceived as very complex and difficult, especially for new entrants who are not familiar with the payment system;
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 157 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Access to land and countering ‘land- grabbing’
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 158 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that access to land is the largest barrier to new entrants to farming in Europe and is limited by the low supply of land for sale or rent in many regions, as well as by the competition from other farmers, investors and residential users; considers that the land access problem is exacerbated by the current direct payment structure, which requires minimal active use of the land and allocates subsidies largely on the basis of land ownership; believes that the existing farmers are incentivised to retain land access in order to retain subsidy access instead of ensuring the best use of the land; recommends increasing the activity levels required to receive payments and to target subsidy payments towards the achievement of particular outcomes (e.g. production of specific environmental or social goods);
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 182 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Considers that Member States could develop tools such as land banks (already existing in some Member States) to further facilitate access to land and prioritizing new entrants to farming;
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 195 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that a proper definition of an active farmer will help generational renewal, drive structural change and aid land mobility;deleted
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 216 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that in many Member States the generational renewal and the access of young people to agricultural land is hindered by late succession; considers that the current CAP lacks any incentives for older farmers to pass their businesses to younger generations; recommends reconsidering the implementation of measures that would motivate older holders to pass their farms to young farmers, such as the ‘farm-exit scheme’ and other incentives for retirement;
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 232 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that the Member States and the regions should be given more power to regulate farmland and set restrictions to that end, particularly with a view to tackling Europe’s land-grabbing and concentration phenomenon, which is limiting young farmers’ options when starting out;
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 252 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. The same conditions and standard of living should be ensured for young people living in rural areas as well as for those living in urban areas. In order to avoid discrimination and to prevent the abandonment of rural areas, it should be provided: Wi-Fi connection, access to health, education, training and innovation, better roads;
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 261 #

2017/2088(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Encourages the setting-up of an "Erasmus" type scheme associated with vocational training to improve young farmers' skills and experience;
2018/01/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 115 #

2017/2055(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Reiterates its call from 2014for the Commission and the Member States to take all necessary measures to play an active role in facilitating thean internationally agreed ban on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil (HFO) as ship fuel in vessels navigating the Arctic seas on the basis of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) and through port state control, along similar lines to the way the waters surrounding Antarctica have been regulated; invites the Commission to include the environmental and climate risks of the use of HFO in its position on International Ocean Governance; calls on the Commission, in the absence of adequate international measures, to put forward proposals on rules for vessels calling at EU ports prior to journeys through Arctic waters, with a view to prohibiting the use and carriage of HFO;
2017/07/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 229 #

2017/2055(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Reiterates that, in accordance with the Paris Agreement, all sectors of the economy are required to contribute to the reduction of CO2 emissions; urges the adoption of clear targets to reduce international maritime CO2 emissions at global level through the IMO; notes, furthermore, that the EU should contribute in parallel to the reduction of CO2 emissions from shipping by introducing a robust pricing mechanism as soon as possible;
2017/07/06
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 67 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) In order to facilitate the cooperation with other Member States and the screening of foreign direct investment by the Commission, Member States should notify their screening mechanisms and any amendments thereto to the Commission, and should report on the application of their screening mechanisms on a regular basis. For the same reason, Member States that do not have a screening mechanism should also be invited to report on the foreign direct investments that took place in their territory, on the basis of the information available to them.
2018/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Member States and the Commission should take all necessary measures to ensure the protection of confidential and other sensitive information, particularly where the security and integrity of a Member State are concerned.
2018/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 100 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may screen foreign direct investments that are likely to affect Union projects orand programmes of Union interest on the grounds of security or public order.
2018/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 144 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Foreign investors and undertakings concerned shall have the possibility to seek judicial redress against screening decisions of the national authorities, in a way that such redress shall not compromise Member State security or infringe the decision making capacities of Member States.
2018/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 156 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shallmay inform the Commission and the other Member States of any foreign direct investments that are undergoing screening within the framework of their screening mechanisms, within 510 working days from the start of the screening. As part of the information, and when applicable, the screening Member States shall endeavour to indicate whether it considers that the foreign direct investment undergoing screening is likely to fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.
2018/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 163 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission considers that a foreign direct investment is likely to affect security or public order in one or more Member States, it may issue an advisory opinion addressed to the Member State in which the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed. The Commission may issue anits opinion irrespective of whether other Member States have provided comments.
2018/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 169 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. Comments pursuant to paragraphs 2 or advisory opinions pursuant to paragraph 3 shall be addressed to the Member State where the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed within a reasonable period of time, and in any case no later than 25 working days following receipt of the information referred to in paragraphs 1 or 4. In cases where the opinion of the Commission follows comments from other Member States, the Commission shall have 25 additional working days for issuing the opinionout delay.
2018/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 181 #

2017/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5
5. The Member States where the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed shall take utmost account of the Commission's opinion and provide an explanation to the Commission in case its opinion is not followed.deleted
2018/02/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2016/2314(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Heading 1
on the 2016 Commission Report on Kosovo *This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

2016/2314(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
— having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Council meeting of 19 and 20 June 2003 concerning the proto fully and effectively support the European perspective of the Western Balkan countries joining the European Unions,
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #

2016/2314(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Expresses concern at the persistent extreme polarisation of the political landscape; calls on all the parties to create the conditions for a fruitful, solution and result-oriented dialogue with a view to defusing tension and reaching a sustainable compromise aimed at facilitating the progress of the country on it's European patherspective;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 81 #

2016/2314(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes with concern that the post of Minister of European Integration still remains vacant and that this undermines the coherence and effectiveness of SAA implementation policies; underlines that the path towards EU integrationKosovo's EU perspective requires a strategic long-term vision and sustained commitment in the adoption and implementation of the necessary reforms;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2016/2314(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages the remainingNotes that five Member States did noto proceed with the recognition of Kosovo; stresses that recognition would be beneficial to the normalisation of relations between Belgrade and Pristina; encourages a positive approach with regard to Kosovo’s participation in international organisationsin this regard takes positive note of the decision of those five member states to facilitate the approval of the SAA, in the Council;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 107 #

2016/2314(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the proposal by the Commission to grant visa liberalisation, which would be a very positive step for Kosovo on the path to's perspective towards European integration; is concerned by the stalemate in the Assembly with regard to the ratification of the demarcation agreement with Montenegro, and stresses that visa liberalisation can only be granted once Kosovo has fulfilled all criteria, including with regard to building up a track record of high-level convictions for corruption and organised crime;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 267 #

2016/2314(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the authorities to implement all UN conventions in cultural and religious heritage at all levels regardless of the status of Kosovo vis-à-vis UNESCO; welcomes, in this connection, the EU-funded programme aimed at protecting and reconstructing small cultural and religious heritage sites;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 279 #

2016/2314(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Warmly welcomes the Council of Europe’s decision to grant Kosovo observer status in its Parliamentary Assembly as of January 2017 in respect of Kosovo-related sessions; supportstakes note of Kosovo’s efforts to integrate into the international community; calls, in this connection, for the participation of Kosovo and participate into all the relevant regional and international organisations and urges Serbia to stop interfering in this process;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas (potential) candidate countries are judged on their own merits and the quality of the necessary reforms determines the timetable for accession;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas accession negotiations are a powerful incentive for adopting and implementing accession-related reformscandidate status brings greater responsibilities for Albania to deliver on the reform agenda (in line with EU Common Positions for SA Councils); whereas the EU accession process is a powerful incentive for adopting and implementing accession-related reforms; whereas challenges still persist and need to be addressed swiftly and efficiently in order to make further progress on its path to EU accession;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the protection of religious freedom, cultural heritage and the administration of property in accordance with the rule of law are fundamental values of the European Union;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes Albania’s continuous progress on EU-related reforms, in particular the adoption of constitutional amendments paving the way for a comprehensive judicial reform; stresses that not only consistent adoption but also full and timely implementation of reforms on all five key priorities and sustained political commitment are essential in order to further advance the EU accession process; encourages Albania to establish a solid track record with regard to such reforms;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Fully supports Albania’s accession to the EU, and recalls for the accession negotiations to be opened as soon as there is credible progress in the implementation of judicial reform, in order to keep the reform momentumthat a sustained, comprehensive and inclusive implementation of all five key priorities has to be ensured before the opening of accession negotiations; expects Albania to consolidate the progress achieved and to maintainaccelerate the pace of progress on implementation of all key priorities;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 62 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Commends the consensual adoption of the constitutional amendments for judicial reform and the adoption of laws on the institutional reorganisation of the judiciary; calls for the swift adoption and credible implementation of all relevant accompanying laws and by-laws, in particular the law on the re-evaluation (vetting) of judges, prosecutors and legal advisors; notes that the application of the vetting law has been suspended by the Constitutional Court, and that the latter has requested the opinion of the Venice Commission on its constitutionality; reiterates that a comprehensive judicial reform is a major demand by Albania’s citizens for re-establishing trust in their political representatives and public institutions, and that the credibility and effectiveness of the overall reform process, including the fight against corruption and organised crime, also depend on the success of the vetting process and judicial reform; recalls that adopting and implementing such a reform is essential to the entrenchment of the rule of law, as well as to enhance the enforcement of fundamental rights in the country, also with a view to increase trust in the judicial system amongst all citizens throughout Albania, including persons belonging to minorities;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the efforts towards a more citizen-friendly public administration and steady progress in the implementation of public administration reform; stresses the need for a more efficient, depoliticised, and professional public administration; calls for further progress in strengthening the application of the Civil Service Law and the Law on Administrative Procedures, in order to safeguard the independence of regulatory bodies, improve recruitment procedures based on merit and performance, and enhance institutional and human resource capacities, with a view to ensuring efficient conduct of EU accession negotiations; commends the National Council for European Integration on its initiatives to enhance the capacities of public administration and civil society in monitoring the implementation of accession-related reforms;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 105 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the adoption of key pieces of anti-corruption legislation, including on the protection of whistle- blowers; is concerned, however, that key anti-corruption institutions continue to be subject to political interference and have limited administrative capacities; continues to be concerned about widespread corruption, in many areas particularly in education, healthcare, the judiciary, public procurement, public private partnership concessions, construction and spatial planning, local government and the public service; stresses the need for a more adequate legal framework for conflicts of interest, regulating lobbying and better interinstitutional cooperation, especially between police and prosecution services, with a view to improving their track record as regards investigation, prosecution and conviction, including in high level cases; in view of the upcoming parliamentary elections, calls for effective oversight of political party financing;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 110 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the continued implementation of the strategy and action plan on the fight against organised crime and intensified international police cooperation; welcomes recent operations against drug plantnotes that illicit proceeds of narcotics account for a significant proportion of Albania's GDP; calls on the competent authorities to strengthen their efforts in the fight against the production and trafficking of drugs and narcotics, including by stepping up international and regional cooperations; calls also for organised crime networks to be dismantled and for the number of final convictions in organised crime cases to be increased, by enhancing cooperation between police and prosecution services and by strengthening institutional and operational capacities; underlines the need to step up efforts to prevent human trafficking, in particular as regards unaccompanied children and child victims of trafficking;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 137 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. URecalls, among the key priorities, the need to reinforce the protection of human rights, minority rights and anti- discrimination policies and efficient implementation of property rights; in particular, encourages Albania to strengthen the protection of persons belonging to minorities and recalls the importance of measures to guarantee and ensure in practice their equal access to all rights including those enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, throughout Albania; calls on Albania to address legal gaps that have been identified and clarify state policy by adopting comprehensive legislation according to its relevant commitments and in line with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee of the Council of Europe Framework Convention on National Minorities; recalls that any policy or legislative proposals in the field of protection of persons belonging to minorities should fully respect the principle of free self-identification; urges the competent authorities to continue improving the climate of inclusion and tolerance for all minorities in the country, including by enhancing the role of the State Committee on Minorities; as regards Roma and Egyptians, calls for continued efforts in improving their access to employment, education, health, social housing and legal aid; is concerned that, despite improvements, the inclusion of Roma children in the education system remains the lowest in the region;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 191 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that the enforcement of property rights remains to be efficiently ensured; Calls for the process of property registration, restitution and compensation to be completed, and for the 2012-2020 strategy on property rights to be implemented effectively;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 214 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Commends Albania on its continued full alignment with relevant EU declarations and Council conclusions, thereby demonstrating its clear commitment to European integration and solidarity; underlines the importance of ensuring good neighbourly relations, which remain essential as an integral part of the Enlargement Process as well as of the Stabilisation and Association Process conditionality; commends both Albania and Serbia on their continued commitment to improving bilateral relations and strengthening regional cooperation at political and societal level, for example through the Regional Youth Cooperation Office (RYCO) headquartered in Tirana; encourages both countries to continue their good cooperation in order to promote reconciliation in the region;underlines the importance of ensuring good neighbourly relations, which remain essential as an integral part of the Enlargement Process as well as of the Stabilisation and Association Process conditionality;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 215 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Commends Albania on its continued full alignment with relevant EU declarations and Council conclusions, thereby demonstrating its clear commitment to European integration and solidarity; underlines the importance of ensuring good neighbourly relations, which remain essential as an integral part of the enlargement process as well as of the Stabilisation and Association Process conditionality; commends both Albania and Serbia on their continued commitment to improving bilateral relations and strengthening regional cooperation at political and societal level, for example through the Regional Youth Cooperation Office (RYCO) headquartered in Tirana; encourages both countries to continue their good cooperation in order to promote reconciliation in the region; recalls that actions and statements which negatively impact on good neighbourly relations should be avoided;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 230 #

2016/2312(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its request that the Commission include information about IPA support for Albania and the effectiveness of implemented measures in its reports, in particular the IPA support allocated for implementation of the key priorities and relevant projects bearing in mind the Commission's declaration on the Strategic Dialogue with the European Parliament;
2017/01/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 111 #

2016/2311(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on Serbia to progressively align its foreign and security policy with that of the EU, including its policy on Russia; welcomes Serbia’s important contribution to and continued participation in international peacekeeping operations;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #

2016/2311(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Commends Serbia’s constructive approach in dealing with the migration crisis; takes positive note of the fact that Serbia has made substantial efforts to ensure that third country nationals receive shelter and humanitarian supplies with EU and international support; stresses that Serbia should adopt and implement the new asylum law; calls on the Commission and the Council to provide continued support for Serbia in addressing migration challenges; encourages Serbia to ensure that the downward trend in the number of asylum seekers coming into the EU from Serbia continues;
2017/01/19
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
— having regard to the European Council’s decision of 16 December 2005 to grant the country the status of candidate for EU membership, to the European Council conclusions of June 2008, to the European Council conclusions of December 2015, and to the conclusions of 13 December 2016, which received the support of the overwhelming majority of delegations,
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12
— having regard to the judgment of the International Court of Justice on the Application of the Interim Accord of 13 September 1995,deleted
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas early parliamentary elections held in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia had a very high turnout;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas accession negotiations should be opened upon the fulfilment of required conditions; whereas the country has been consideredan EU candidate for many years as one of the most advanced countries in termsnd has a relative good level of alignment of alignment with the acquis;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas bilateral disputes should be duly addressed in compliance with EU and UN standards and should not represent an obstacle to the opening of accession negotiations;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 62 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas bilateral disputes should be duly addressed in compliance with EU and UN standards and should not represent an obstacle to the opening of accession negotiations; with due regards to the need for good neighbourly relations and the improvement of regional cooperation between EU Member States and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as an EU candidate country;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Expects the new government, in cooperation with other parties, to accelerate EU-related reforms; reiteratestakes positive note that the Commission its support for the opening ofprepared to extend its recommendation to accession negotiations, conditional on the progress of the implementation of the Przhino Agreement and substantial progress in the Urgent Reform Priorities; continues to be convinced that negotiat, in line with previonus can generate much-needed reforms and positively influence the resolution of bilateral disputesCouncil Conclusions and established conditionality;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 108 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Urges once again that the political will be shown to fully implement the Urgent Reform Priorities and the Przhino Agreement; calls on the Commission to assess, at its earliest convenience but before the end of 2017when appropriate, the country’s progress on implementation and to report back to Parliament; while recalling that long overdue reforms need to be launched and implemented, supports the continuation of the High Level Accession Dialogue (HLAD) for systematically assisting the country in this endeavour; draws attention to the potential negative consequences of further delays in the country’s accession process;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 150 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the Special Prosecutor has raised the first criminal indictments concerning wrongdoings arising from the wiretaps; is concerned about attacks and obstruction against her work and the lack of cooperation from other institutions; considers it essential for the democratic process to enable the Special Prosecutor’s Office to carry out thorough investigations in full autonomy; calls for the Office to be given the conditions and time necessary to complete its important work;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 229 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Remains concerned that the political situation represents a serious risk to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonian economy; continues to be concerned about weak contract enforcement, the size of the informal economy and the difficulty in obtaining access to finance; stresses that the sizeable shadow economy is an important obstacle to business; calls on competent authorities to also address judicial efficiency;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 271 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. CommendNotes the country's efforts for constructive cooperation into addressing the migration crisis; recommends further actions to ensure capacities to combat human trafficking and migrant smuggling;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 287 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes Macedonia’s continued constructive role in regional and international cooperationUnderlines the importance of regional cooperation in line with the European agenda and European values and calls for further progress in this regard; commends the increased alignment with EU foreign policy (73 %); reiterates the importance of finalising the negotiations on a bilateral treaty with Bulgaria;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 305 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the tangible results from theGreek initiative which resulted in confidence-building measures with Greece; strongly reiterates its invitation to the Vice-President/High Representative (VP/HR) and the Commission to develop new initiatives to overcomethe former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; underlines the fact that maintaining good neighborly relations, including a negociated and mutually acceptable solution to the name issue, under the auspices of the UN, remaining differences and to work, in cooperation with the two countries and the UN Special Representative, on a mutually acceptable solution on the name issue and to report back to Parliament theres essential, reiterates its full support to the UN process which remains the key framework for a solution as it is recognized by both parties; recalls that a constructive approach to relations with neighboring EU Member States remains important while avoiding gestures, controversial actions and statements which negatively impact on good neighborly relations;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 68 #

2016/2309(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Continues to be deeply concerned about the polarised domestic climate and the boycott of parliamentary activities by members of the opposition; urges again all political forces to re-engage in constructive cooperation within the Montenegrin parliament; calls for further reinforcement of the parliament’s scrutiny of the accession process and capacity for budget oversight; insists repeatedly on the need for a duewhile acknowledging that some progress has been made on the judicial follow- up ton the "audio- recordings affair", urges once again a due political follow up on the issue;
2017/02/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
— having regard to its previous resolutions, in particular those of 24 November 2016 on EU-Turkey relations1 , and 27 October 2016 on the situation of journalists in Turkey2 , and of 13 November 2014 on Turkey's actions creating tensions in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Cyprus, _________________ 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0450. 2 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0423.
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
— having regard to the declaration issued by the European Community and its Member States on 21 September 2005, including the provision that the recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the negotiations, and the need for Turkey to fulproceed to the normalisation of its relations with all Member States and to fully and effectively implement the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement to all Member States by removing all obstacles to the free movement of goods, including restrictions on means of transport, without prejudice and discrimination,
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
— having regard to Article 46 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which states that the contracting parties undertake to abide by the final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in any case to which they are parties, and to the obligation of Turkey to implement all judgements of the European Courts,
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18
— having regard to the crisis in Syria, the efforts towards a ceasefire and a peaceful settlement, and Turkey’s obligations to enhance stability and promote good neighbourly relations through intensive efforts in order to resolve outstanding bilateral issues, disputes and conflicts with the neighbouring countries over land and maritime borders and airspace, in accordance with international agreements, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the UN Charter,
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18
— having regard to the crisis in Syria, the efforts towards a ceasefire and a peaceful settlement, and Turkey’s obligations to enhance stability and promote good neighbourly relations through intensive efforts in order to resolve outstanding bilateral issues, disputes and conflicts with the neighbouring countries over land and maritime borders and airspace, in accordance with the UN Charter and the UNCLOS,
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 127 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Expresses, once again, serious concern and urges Turkey to avoid any kind of threat or action directed against a Member State;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 136 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. NotesIs gravely concerned that measures undertaken following the declaration of the state of emergency have targeted alleged members/supporters of the Gülen movement, dissent in general and political parties of the opposition in particular; strongly condemns the imprisonment of 13 MPs belonging to the People’s Democratic Party (HDP), including its co-chairs, and of 90 Kurdish municipal mayors; expresses its great concern about the severe situation of more than one hundred political prisoners, including 34 women, who are on indefinite and non-alternate hunger strike; 13 of them entered a critical stage being on hunger strike since 15 February 2017, and on the verge of irreversible damage on their health; urges the Turkish Government to lift the state of emergency immediately; underlines that the reintroduction of the death penalty would violate Turkey’s international commitments and lead to an immediate end to the EU accession talks;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 141 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that measures undertaken following the declaration of the state of emergency have targeted alleged members/supporters of the Gülen movement, dissent in general and political parties of the opposition in particular; strongly condemns the imprisonment of 13 MPs belonging to the People’s Democratic Party (HDP), including its co-chairs, and of 90 Kurdish municipal mayors; urges the Turkish Government to lift the state of emergency immediately; underlines that the reintroduction of the death penalty would violate Turkey’s international commitments and lead to an immediate end to the EU accession talks due to the fact that the unequivocal rejection of the death penalty is an essential requirement for EU membership;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 202 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on Turkey to protect the rights of the most vulnerable groups and of persons belonging to minorities; regrets that the LGBTI marches in Ankara and Istanbul were banned for the second consecutive year; is seriously concerned about gender-based violence, discrimination, hate speech against minorities, hate crime, lack of respect for the freedom of religion or belief and violations of the human rights of LGBTI persons; calls on Turkey to harmonise its domestic legislation with the Council of Europe’s Istanbul Convention, which it ratified in 2014; welcomes the government’s national strategy and action plan for Roma and encourages the authorities to address key obstacles to the social inclusion of Roma;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 218 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. WBelcomieves the deepening ofat EU- Turkey relcooperations in key areas of joint interest, such as counter-terrorism, migration, energy, the economy and trade; believes EU-Turkey cooperation in these areas to can only be an investment in the stability and prosperity of both Turkey and the EU, if it is based on the full respect of fundamental rights and the implementation of the agreements towards all Member States;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 232 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that strengthening trade relations could bring concrete benefits to citizens in Turkey and the EU, and therefore supports the Commission’s proposal to start negotiations on the upgrading of the Customs Union; reiterates that the EU is Turkey’s main trading partner and that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States; considers the involvement of social partners in negotiations as crucial; calls on the Commission to include political benchmarks on human rights and, fundamental freedoms and the principle of good neighbourly relations in the upgraded Customs Union;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 234 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that strengthening tradTakes note of the prelations could bring concrete benefits to citizens in Turkey and the EU, and therefore supports the Commission’s proposal to start negotiations on the upgrading of the Customs Unparatory work for an upgrading of the EU-Turkey Customs Union, without prejudice to Member States' position; reiterates that the EU is Turkey’s main trading partner and that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States; considers the involvementconsultation of social partners in negotiations as crubeneficial; calls on the Commission to include political benchmarks on human rights and fundamental freedoms in the upgraded Customs Unionas well as a suspension clause on the implementation towards all Member States in the upgraded Customs Union; notes that a prerequisite for the modernisation of the Customs Union is that Turkey should proceed to the full, effective and non-discriminatory implementation of the existing Customs Union vis-à-vis all MS, including the Republic of Cyprus;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Calls on Turkey to further align its foreign policy with that of the EU in accordance with the provisions of the Negotiating Framework;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 259 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that visa liberalisation is important for the Turkish population and will enhance people-to-people contacts; encouragescalls on the Turkish Government to withdraw unilateral declarations and to comply with the finall outstanding criteria, including revision of its anti-terrorism legislation; calls on the Turkish Government to fully and effectively implement both the Visa Liberalisation Road Map and the Readmission Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States, including cooperation on JHA issues and non-discriminatory access to the Turkish territory for the citizens of all EU Member States;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 274 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to take into account the latest developments in Turkey when conducting the mid-term review of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) funds in 2017, and to suspend all pre-accession funds ifsince Turkey no longer sufficiently complies withdoes not fulfil the EU’s Copenhagen criteria; calls on the Commission to use those funds to support Turkish civil society and to invest more in people-to-people exchange programmes, such as Erasmus+ for students;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 299 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Calls on European Council for EU embargo on arms sales to Turkey, following the decision of Germany and Austria;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 311 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Commends the engagement by the Turkish Government and the hospitality shown by the population in hosting around 3 million refugees; notes the EU-Turkey statement on migration and underlines the importance of a full and non- discriminatory implementation of all its aspects, and urges the Member States to initiate the voluntary resettlement scheme for the most vulnerable refugees in Turkey; calls on the Commission to ensure long- term investment in both refugees and their host communities in Turkey; encourages the Turkish Government to grant work permits to all Syrian refugees; calls on Ankara to keep up its patrolling efforts in the Aegean and to implement fully, to enhance efforts to combat migrant smuggling and to implement fully and effectively the EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement and the bilateral readmission agreements signed with Bulgaria and Greece;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 335 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls upon the Turkish government to halt its plans for the construction of the Akkuyuy nuclear power plant; points out that the envisaged site is located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, hence posing a major threat not only to Turkey but to the Mediterranean region as a whole; requests accordingly that the Turkish government join the Espoo Convention, which commits parties to notifying and consulting each other on major projects under consideration that are likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact across boundaries; asks the Turkish government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries, such as Greece and Cyprus, during any further developments in the Akkuyuy venture;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 344 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18 b. Calls on Turkey to cooperate with relevant international organizations, especially the Council of Europe, in preventing and combatting illicit trafficking and the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage within Turkey and the occupied part of Cyprus;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 345 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18 c. Recalls its position adopted in the report on the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy in 2016 about the importance of ensuring the coherence of EU policy as regards situations involving the occupation or annexation of territory; recalls, in this regard, that the immediate withdrawal of Turkish occupation forces and the full restoration of the sovereignty of the Republic of Cyprus, in line with the UNSC resolutions, should be the first step for achieving a long-term political solution, guaranteeing the well-being, security and democratic rights of all Cypriots;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 347 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines that a settlement of the Cyprus problem would have a positive impact on the entire region, while first and foremost benefiting both Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots, would have a positive impact on the entire region; praises the leaders of the Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots communities in Cyprus for having achieved major progress in the settlement talks; welcomes the exchange of preferred maps, thus far unprecedented, and the first international conference held with the guarantor powers; supports thfirst international conference held at Geneva with the guarantor powers and the participation of the EU; regrets the lack of tangible progress during the discussion of security-related aspects, due to the unproductive stance demonstrated by Turkey; supports a just, viable and comprehensive settlement based on a bi- communal, bi-zonal federation with political equality, a single international legal personality, single sovereignty and single citizenship with political equality between the two communities, in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutionss set out in the relevant Security Council resolutions and High Level agreements, with a single international legal personality, single sovereignty and single citizenship , in line with international law and on the basis of respect for the principles on which the Union is founded and the acquis communautaire; welcomes the intensified engagement by the parties to achieve the settlement of the Cyprus problem; expectscalls on Turkey to show activecomply with the EU declaration issued on September 21,2005 and to actively and concretely support for the negotiations, and reiterates that Turkey’s commitment and contribution to a comprehensive settlement remain crucial; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons (CMP), and calls on Turkey to allow access to all relevant sites and to assist the CMP by providing information from its military archivecalls on Turkey to immediately withdraw its troops from Cyprus and to transfer Varosha to the UN and to its lawful inhabitants in accordance with UNSC resolution 550 (1984) as an effort to pave the way for a democratic comprehensive settlement; notes that the EU has much to gain from a viable and functional settlement of the Cyprus problem, thus creating the conditions for good neighbourly relations and improvement in EU-Turkey relations;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 362 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Stresses that Turkey needs to commit itself unequivocally to good neighbourly relations, according to international agreements, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which is part of the EU acquis, as well as to the peaceful settlement of disputes, in accordance with the United Nations Charter, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice. In this context, the European Parliament expresses serious concern and urges Turkey to avoid any kind of threat or action directed against a Member State, or source of friction or actions that damage good neighbourly relations and the peaceful settlement of disputes;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 367 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons (CMP), and calls on Turkey to allow unconditional access to military zones and all relevant sites and to provide relevant information from its military and other archives, thus maximising the effectiveness of the excavations conducted by the CMP; welcomes, in this respect, the appointment of EP standing rapporteur on missing persons;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 376 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19 b. Calls on Turkey to fulfil its obligation of full, non-discriminatory implementation of the Additional Protocol to the EC-Turkey Association Agreement vis-à-vis all Member States, including the Republic of Cyprus, the fulfilment of which could provide a significant boost to the negotiation process; regrets that Turkey has still not made progress towards the normalization of its relations with the Republic of Cyprus; reiterates that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process and calls for progress without any further delay;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 385 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 c (new)
19 c. Deplores Turkey's policy of illegal settlement and calls on Turkey to refrain from further settlement of Turkish citizens in the occupied areas of Cyprus, which is contrary to the Geneva Convention and the principles of international law; urges Turkey to terminate all actions that alter the demographic balance on the island thus impeding a future solution;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 389 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 d (new)
19 d. Reiterates that Turkey needs to commit itself unequivocally to good neighbourly relations, international agreements and to peaceful settlement of bilateral disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice; expresses serious concern over Turkey's renewed threats and provocations as well its decision to issue a NAVTEX purporting to reserve an area within the territorial sea, continental shelf and exclusive economic zone of the Republic of Cyprus; urges Turkey to refrain from any further threat or action which might lead to friction and crisis and might have negative effects on the negotiations for ending the unacceptable status quo; calls on Turkey to sign and ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which has been signed and ratified by the EU and its 28 Member States, without further delay; reiterates its call on Turkey to respect the sovereignty and sovereign rights of Member States over their territorial sea and airspace and their lawful right to enter into bilateral agreements and to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with the EU acquis and international law, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 393 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 e (new)
19 e. Reiterates relevant ECtHR decisions and calls on the Turkish Government to immediately stop the violation of the human rights of the Cypriot citizens and stop depriving them of the enjoyment and exercise of their property, religious and other human rights stemming from the constitutional order of the Republic of Cyprus and the acquis communautaire, as well as the fundamental principles and values of the EU;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 395 #

2016/2308(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 f (new)
19 f. Is concerned about reports indicating the collaboration of Turkey with ISIL, including the purchase of oil products and urges Turkey to refrain from such practices;
2017/05/12
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 b (new)
– having regard to the IMO Polar Code for ships operating in polar waters, entering into force on 1 January 2017,
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 19 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
– having regard to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL),
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 20 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 c (new)
– having regard to the Oil Spill Convention, the Oil Spill Fund and the Supplementary Fund,
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 103 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) is the primary regulator for the shipping industry;
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 175 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Calls on the Commission and the Member States affiliated to the work of the Arctic Council to support that the development of an Arctic Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to preserve the vulnerable ecosystem of the Arctic; notes that this special EIA should eventually be made mandatory and take account of at least the following aspects when evaluating projects taking place in the Arcticeconomic activities in the Arctic takes place in a safe and responsible manner, with due concern for the environment, safety and contingency resources:
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 184 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
- All potential environmental, socio- economic and cultural impacts both during and after the project, including cumulative effects of current and future projects,deleted
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 187 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 2
– The precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle must be applied at all stages of project planning, assessment, implementation and reclamation,deleted
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 192 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 3
– Reclamation and recovery of habitat and affected lands must be thoroughly planned and fully funded in advance,deleted
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 197 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 4
– A proven demonstration of the industry’s ability to retrieve spilled oil in frozen, broken and refreezing ice conditions,deleted
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 198 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 5
– An international liability and compensation regime for contamination of lands, waters and marine areas resulting from offshore oil exploration and exploitation must be established;deleted
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 283 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes plans to create a European Arctic stakeholder forum; agrees not to create new funding mechanisms but to enhance synergies between existing financing instruments in order to prevent possible duplications and to maximise interaction between internal and external EU programmesthe active participation of the EU to the IMO and Arctic Council discussions concerning funding opportunities in the area;
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 359 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Reiterates its position from 2014, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to actively facilitate the ban on the use of heavy fuel oil (HFO) and carriage as ship fuel in vessels navigating the Arctic seas through the MARPOL of IMO and/or through port state controlConvention and the IMO Polar Code; invites the Commission to include the environmental and climate risks of the use of HFO in its study on the risks that the increase in navigation of the Northern Sea Route would bring;
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 361 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Highlights that the route is available to shipping for only a few ice- free weeks during the summer season and that apart from climate factors, shipowners encounter challenges in polar shipping such as polar darkness, poor charts, lack of infrastructure and navigation control systems and low search-and-rescue capability; welcomes the points in the integrated European Union policy that will concretely improve polar shipping conditions and help overcome shipowners' challenges;
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 363 #

2016/2228(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Calls for the rapid ratification and accession by Member States to the Protocol of 2010 to the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Noxious and Hazardous Substances by Sea (HNS Convention);
2016/11/14
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 43 #

2016/2031(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that Turkish regulatory alignment with EU standards resulting from the conclusion of the Customs Union, when in practice applied, has made the country more competitive; believes that the modernisation of the Customs Union would provide an opportunity for Turkey to revisit its growth model and escape from the ‘middle income (country) trap’; welcomes the fact that the deepening of the Customs Union will have a positive influence on Turkey’s economic governance and strengthen Turkey’s independent regulatory institutions;
2017/02/02
Committee: AFET
Amendment 159 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation lays down rules on the definition, description, presentation and labelling of spirit drinks, as well as on the protection of geographical indications for spirit drinks. This Regulation shall also apply to the use of ethyl alcohol or distillates of agricultural origin in the production of alcoholic beverages and to the use of spirit drinks’ names in the presentation and labelling of other foodstuffs.
2017/09/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 197 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5
1. The Commission shall be empowered to adoptArticle 5 delegated acts in accordance with Article 43 concerning: (a) definitions provided for in Annex I; (b) requirements of the categories of spirit drinks provided for in Part I of Annex II and the specific rules concerning certain spirit drinks listed in Part II of Annex II. The delegated acts referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph shall be limited to meeting demonstrated needs resulting from evolving consumer demands, technological progress, developments in relevant international standards or needs for product innovation. 2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 43 concerning the addition of new categories of spirit drinks in Annex II. A new category may be added under the following conditions: (a) under a particular name and in accordance with uniform technical specifications is economically and technically necessary to protect the interests of consumers and producers; (b) market share in at least one Member State; (c) category shall either be a widely used name or where this is not possible be of a descriptive nature, in particular, by referring to the raw material used for the production of the spirit drink; (d) new category shall be laid down and based on an evaluation of existing quality and production parameters used on the Union market. When laying down the technical specifications, the applicable Union consumer protection legislation shall be respected and account shall be taken of any relevant international standards. They shall ensure fair competition amongst union producers as well as the high reputation of Union spirit drinks. 3. exceptional cases where the law of the importing third country so requires, also be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 43 concerning derogations from the requirements under the technical definitions provided for in Annex I, the requirements under the categories of spirit drinks provided for in Part I of Annex II and the specific rules concerning certain spirit drinks listed in Part II of Annex II.Delegated powers the amendment of the technical the amendment of the the marketing of a spirit drink a spirit drink has a significant the name chosen for the new the technical specifications for the The Commission shall, in
2017/09/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 297 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. In order to take into account traditional ageing processes in the Member States, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 43 concerning derogations from Article 11(3) concerning the specification of a maturation period or age in the presentation or labelling of a spirit drink.deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 363 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, gGeographical indications of spirit drinks protected under Regulation (EC) No 110/2008, shall automatically be protected as geographical indications under this Regulation. The Commission shall list them in the Register.
2017/09/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 367 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. For a period of up to two years following the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission, by means of implementing acts, may, on its own initiative, cancel the protection of geographical indications referred to in Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 110/2008 if they do not comply with point (6) of Article 2(1). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 44(2).deleted
2017/09/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 413 #

2016/0392(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 17
(17) ‘Packaging’ means the protective wrappings, cartons, cases, containersuch as papers, envelopes of all kinds, cartons and bottlcases, used in the transport and/or sale of spirit drinkone or more containers.
2017/09/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 370 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 269 – paragraph 1 – point 5 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013
Article 52 – paragraph 3
5b. In Article 52, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: “ “3. Coupled support may only be granted to those sectors or to those regions of a Member State where specific types of farming or specific agricultural sectors, including quality systems, that are particularly important for economic, social or environmental reasons undergo certain difficulties. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32013R1307&rid=1). “ Or. it
2017/03/28
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 372 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 269 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013
Article 52 – paragraph 3a (new)
5a. In Article 52, the following paragraph is added: 3a. “Coupled support may be granted to milk producers in island areas, in particular for product quality and animal welfare”
2017/03/28
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 497 #

2016/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 270 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 221a (new)
4 a. The following Article is inserted: Article 221a Measures to address a sudden and significant drop in farm income 1.The Commission shall adopt implementing acts taking necessary and justifiable emergency measures to address a sudden and significant drop in farm income in a particular sector in a region of the Union. Such measures should by targeted and may include but not be restricted to a top up to direct payments or a once-off lump sum payment to the member state concerned to be distributed to affected farmers with targeted measures. 2.Support under paragraph 1 shall only be granted in duly justified cases and where the drop of income exceeds 30 % of the average annual income of farmers, derived from that particular sector, in the preceding three-year period or a three- year average based on the preceding five- year period excluding the highest and lowest entry. Income for the purposes of this and the preceding paragraphs shall refer to the sum of revenues the farmer receives from the market, for that particular sector, including any form of public support but excluding any payments from insurance schemes of any kind, and after deducting input costs. Payments to farmers shall compensate for less than 70 % of the income loss in the year the producer becomes eligible to receive this assistance; where the farmer receives additional income from any insurance schemes of any kind, the total compensation should not exceed 100% of the income loss in the year concerned. 3. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament and the Council of any measure adopted under paragraph 1 or 2 within two working days of its adoption
2017/03/28
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 155 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency shall be an independent centre for gathering relevant, reliable, accurate and up-to date information on countries of origin of persons applying for international protection, including child-specific information and targeted information on persons belonging to vulnerable groups. It shall draw up and regularly update reports and other products providing for information on countries of origin at the level of the Union including on thematic issues specific to countries of origin.
2016/10/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) make use of all relevant sources of information, including its information analysis on the situation of asylum and other information gathered from governmental, non-governmental and international organisations, including through the networks referred to in Article 9, fact finding missions, as well as Union institutions, agencies, bodies, offices and the European External Action Service;
2016/10/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #

2016/0131(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) manage and further develop a portal for gathering and disseminating information on countries of origin;
2016/10/31
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2015/2279(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that investing in accessibility, infrastructures and services is crucial for decreasing the effects of peripherality and isolation of disadvantaged and less developed mountainous areas;
2016/01/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 257 #

2015/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that inclusive multilateral diplomacy under the leadership of the VP/HR is a crucial tool in conflict resolution in the neighbourhood, in full conformity with the international law, including the no use of force and territorial integrity; believes that more links and synergies need to be made between diplomacy and home affairs;
2016/02/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #

2015/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas the EU is the most dedicated defender and promoter of human rights, cultural valuesdiversity, democracy and the rule of law, whose provisions are included in all its bilateral partnerships and have a central position in its multilateral policy;
2015/09/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 209 #

2015/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Is of the conviction that the economic and social dimension of the UN System must be substantially strengthened, and that this could be achieved through the establishment of a Sustainable Development Council as the main decision making body for all sustainable development related matters (based on the three pillars, social, economic and environmental), ensuring coordinated and efficient assessment of the needs, and adoption of necessary roadmaps, decisions and binding measures; stresses that this is necessary to effectively implement the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by the UN Summit in September;deleted
2015/09/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 228 #

2015/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. With a view to ensure the necessary legitimacy, efficiency and effectiveness of the decisions that this Sustainable Development Council would take, considers that its status and composition should be similar to those of the Security Council with a few permanent members, including the EU, and rotating ones; considers however that no justification whatsoever can be found to entitle a country or a regional organisation to the right to stop any decision taken by a majority or a qualified majority of the members, and therefore rejects any form of veto right;deleted
2015/09/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 238 #

2015/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that this Council should also have a strong coordinative role in all other fields in the UN System but security; in light of the recurring human catastrophes linked to illegal migrations, and considering that sustainable development of the countries of origin could facilitate in the long run a drying up of illegal migration flows, is of the conviction that this Council should coordinate the work of all agencies related to this concern;deleted
2015/09/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 258 #

2015/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Is of the view that the Sustainable Development Council should coordinate also the work of the World Bank Group, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organisation, to ensure that their respective decisions are taken and actions are carried out in an efficient and coherent fashion; in the same spirit, is therefore of the opinion that the activities of the unofficial G-20 Group should be merged to those of this Council;deleted
2015/09/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 273 #

2015/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that, besides promoting economic and social development in the world, the Sustainable Development Council should also be responsible for human well-being related matters; considers that the Sustainable Development Council should also be responsible for cultural sustainability, since culture is recognized as a key factor for building sustainable societies together with social, economic and environmental development, by integrating education, cultural diplomacy, protection of heritage, creative sector and scientific research in the policy-making approach;deleted
2015/09/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the need for a holistic EU approach to migration which ensures coherence between its internal and external policies; underlines that it is important to address the root causes of migration, while dealing with the symptoms; stresses that the EU should define a new approach to its external policies in order to effectively tackle the root causes;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the persistent instability and conflicts in the EU's neighbourhood have a serious impact on the mass influx of migrants; believes that a genuine response to the migration crisis in the Mediterranean will come only from tackling the root causes, namely poverty, instability, wars, terrorism, persecution, and violations of human rights and natural disasters;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on key origin and transit countries for irregular migration to the EU to immediately implement the existing bilateral readmission agreements fully and effectively; highlights, furthermore, the need to improve cross-border cooperation with neighbouring EU Member States in this respect, including through enhanced operational and technical cooperation with FRONTEX; believes, at the same time, that the EU should establish a binding resettlement programme with yearly quotas and a permanent mandatory and automatically triggered relocation system across the EU;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the launch of the EUNAVFOR Med operation against smugglers and traffickers in the Mediterranean andwhich since its establishment has been involved in 9 rescue activities contributing to saving more than 1400 lives; supports the reinforcement of the management of the Union's external borders; insists, however, on the need for sustained, coordinatedeffective search and rescue operationmechanisms in the Mediterranean to save lives and for an EU policy on asylum, subsidiary protection and temporary protection which fully comply with binding obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and respect the non- refoulement principle;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 151 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for a clear distinction between legitimate asylum seekers and irregular migrants in EU internal and external policies to achieve fair and swift procedures that either lead to effective integration or return in cases of unfounded applications; in this regard, it highlights the importance of setting up the concepts of "safe and unsafe" third countries;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 155 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Points out that additional EU budget resources will be required to tackle the migration crisis in the Mediterranean through the implementation of new proposals and actions; underlines the need for the immediate provision of technical and financial assistance to the frontline countries bearing the brunt of the migratory crisis and measures to ease the pressure on, initial reception facilities resulting from the massive increase in the mixed migrant influx;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Stresses out that agreements with third countries should encourage control and reduce migration flows before migrants arrive at EU borders; calls for establishment of migration information centres in third countries financed in cooperation with the government concerned and the UNHRC;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Calls for development of protection capabilities in third countries of transit; calls for more targeted humanitarian aid in order to ease the burden of countries bordering war zones such as regional relocation and support programmes as well as regional cooperation networks;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 167 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6e. Highlights the impact of ISIS and its evolution on the mass influx of legitimate asylum seekers and irregular migrants; acknowledges a crucial role of security and counter-terrorism policies in tackling root causes of migration;
2015/09/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #

2015/2010(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital U – point iii
(iii) whereas the overall principle of corporate taxation in the Union should be that taxes are paid in the countries where a company's actual economic activity and value creation takes place; whereas criteria should be developed to ensure that this occurs; whereas any use of 'patent box' or other preferential tax regimes must also ensure that taxes are paid in the place where value is generated; whereas, any policy, strategy and measures decided on a legal and economic level should be in line with the Union principles taking also into consideration that the corporate sector is inherent with the free services and competition as main pillars of the free market;
2015/10/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 174 #

2015/2010(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Recital V – introductory part
V. whereas improved coordination alone will not solve fundamental problems arising from the fact that different rules regarding corporate taxation exist in different Member States; whereas part of the overall response to aggressive tax planning must involve the convergence of a limited number of national tax practices; whereas this can be achieved while still preserving the sovereignty of Member States in relation to other elements of their corporate tax systems; whereas, we should take into consideration the sovereign rights of Member States and the diversities on economic, commercial and corporate sectors in terms of affecting the growth, development and national income on which they depend on as well as the social cohesion within the Member State and the Union as such;
2015/10/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 326 #

2015/2010(INL)

Motion for a resolution
Annex – title 2 – subtitle 1 – paragraph 1
As a first step, by June 2016, a mandatory Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB) in the Union, with an exemption for small- and medium-sized enterprises and companies with no cross-border activity, in order to have only one set of rules for companies operating in several Member States to calculate their taxable profits, with respect to the acquis communautaire, the sovereign rights of Member States and their economic and social cohesion and stability ;an exception should also be implemented regarding the economies of Member States depending on corporate and service providing sectors will also contribute to the growth and development of the Union economy.
2015/10/13
Committee: ECON
Amendment 125 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes in the continued value of its initially stated objective of creating an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, based on the founding values and principles of the Union, through a deep structural transformationsignificant reforms in the neighbouring countries; stresses therefore the need to go back to basics and bring this objective back to the top of the agenda;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 189 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Urges that short-, medium- and long- term priorities and strategic objectives be defined, bearing in mind that the ENP should aim to create different levels of cooperation in different areas among and with the ENP countries; stresses that in defining its approach the EU should look at its interests and priorities and those of the individual countries concerned, together with their level of development, considering the interests of society on the whole and not only those of the political elite;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 223 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EU to improve its coordination with other donors and international financial institutions and calls for joint programming with its Member States; considers that better coordination with the Member States is necessary in order to achieve a common approach to the short- and medium-term goals of the EU's cooperation with neighbouring cou, including through the implementation of the Southern Mediterranean Investment Coordination Initiative (AMICI) in the Southern Neighbourhood which aims at bringing together the EU, MS, EFIs and IDI's and other multilateral and bilateral donors as appropriate, in cooperation with partner countries to promote coordination, complementarity and synergies in investment-related programmes;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 236 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls for joint programming with its Member States; is of the view that better coordination with the Member States is necessary in order to achieve a common approach to the short-and medium term goals of the EU's cooperation with the neighbouring countries;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 266 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the ENP should deploy its own methodology and tools, which correspond to the level of ambition and goals thatof the partnership between the different ENP countries aspire to in their relations withnd the EU;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 281 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to focus on sectors identified together with its partners, in which progress and universal added value can be achieved, and to gradually expand cooperation based on progress and ambitioninterests;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 357 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the ENP to be developed into a more tailor-made and flexible policy framework able to adapt to the diversity that exists; underlines that differentiation should not take place not only between Eastern and Southern partners but alsorather among the ENP countries themselves; notes that more differentiation and tailor made approach should be based on ownership and shared interests, without rigid clarifications or ranking of partners and building on a comprehensive joint evaluation of the potential of our relationship with each partner;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 372 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the need to implement conditionalityan incentive-based approach in relation to reform processes; emphasises that the EU cannot compromise its fundamental values and should avoid creating double standards; stresses that countries that are making progress in implementing reforms and following European policy should be granted more substantial support;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 392 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that the EU should invite non-association partner countries to engage in sectorial cooperation in line with an ‘ENP Plus' model, including the possibility of concluding sectorial agreements that would facilitate the integration of non-association partner countries into specific sectorial parts of the single area of the four basic freedoms of the EU;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 550 #

2015/2002(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
31. Calls for the EU to explore and identify, together with its partners, priorities for integcooperation in different policy fields, such as economic development, infrastructure and regional development, the environment, competition policies, SMEs, migration, security, energy and energy efficiency, with the aim of creating an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness;
2015/05/13
Committee: AFET
Amendment 79 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In a spirit ofUndertaking a shared responsibility with the Member states, the role of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be to regularly monitor the management of the external borders. The Agency should ensure proper and effective monitoring not only through risk analysis, information exchange and Eurosur, but also through presence of experts from its own staff in Member States. The Agency should therefore be able to deploy liaison officers to specific Member States for a period of time during which the liaison officer reports to the Executive Director. The report of the liaison officers should form part of the vulnerability assessment.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 80 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should organise the appropriate technical and operational assistance to Member States so as to reinforce their capacity to implement their obligations with regard to the control of the external borders, and to face challenges at the external border resulting from irregular immigration or cross-border crime, without prejudice to the national responsible authorities competence to initiate criminal investigations. In this respect, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, organise and coordinate joint operations for one or more Member States and deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams as well as the necessary technical equipment, and it may deploy experts from its own staff.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In cases where there is a specific and disproportionate pressure at the external borders, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should, at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, organise and coordinate rapid border interventions and deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams from a rapid reserve pool as well as technical equipment. Rapid border interventions should provide reinforcement in situations where immediate response is required and where such an intervention would provide an effective response. To ensure the effective operation of such intervention, Member States should make border guards and other necessary relevant staff available to the rapid reserve pool as soon as possible.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 88 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should have the necessary equipment and staff at its disposal to be deployed in joint operations or rapid border interventions. To this end, when launching rapid border interventions at the request of a Member State or in the context of a situation requiring urgent action, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency should be able to deploy European Border and Coast Guard Teams from a rapid reserve pool which should be a standing corps composed of a small percentage of the total number of border guards in the Member States, which should amount to a minimum of 1 500. The deployment of the European Border and Coast Guard Teams from the rapid reserve pool should be immediately complemented by additional European Border and Coast Guard Teams as appropriate.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 89 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) On 8 October 2015, the European Council called for enlarging the mandate of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union to assist Member States in ensuring the effective return of illegally staying third-country nationals, including by organising return operations on its own initiative and enhancing its role regarding the acquisition of travel documents. For this purpose, the European Council called for the establishment of a Return Office within the European Border and Coast Guard Agency which should be tasked with the coordination of the Agency’s activities in the field of return.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should step up its assistance to Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, subject to the Union return policy and in compliance with Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.15 In particular, following the request of one or more Member States it should coordinate and organise return operations from one or more Member States and it should organise and conduct return interventions to reinforce the return system of Member States requiring increased technical and operational assistance when complying with their obligation to return illegally staying third-country nationals in accordance with that Directive. __________________ 15 Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in member states for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ L 348, 21.12.2008, p. 98).
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 91 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency should monitor and contribute tokeep abreast of the developments in research relevant for the control of the external borders in order to use the most adequate resourses, including the use of advanced surveillance technology, and it should disseminate this information to the Member States and to the Commission.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) The European Border and Coast Guard Agency, in agreement with the Member State(s) concerned, should facilitate and encourage operational cooperation between Member States and third countries in the framework of the external relations policy of the Union in cooperation with the Commission and EEAS, including by coordinating operational cooperation between Member States and third countries in the field of manageafter risk assessment of the EU external borders neighboring third countries and by deploying liaison officers to third countries, as well as by cooperating with the authorities of third countries on return, including as regards the acquisition of travel documents. In their cooperation with third countries, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and Member States should comply with norms and standards at least equivalent to those set by Union legislation also when the cooperation with third countries takes place on the territory of those countries.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 95 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) This Regulation establishes a complaint mechanism for the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, in cooperation with the Fundamental Rights Officer, to monitor and ensure the respect for fundamental rights in all the activities of the Agency. This should be an administrative mechanism whereby the Fundamental Rights Officer should be responsible for handling complaints received by the Agency in accordance with the right to good administration. The Fundamental Rights Officer should review the admissibility of a complaint, register admissible complaints, forward all registered complaints to the Executive Director and Management Board, forward complaints concerning border guardmembers of the teams to the home Member State and register the follow-up by the Agency or that Member State. This data should be included in the annual report of the Agency .Criminal investigations should be conducted by the Member States.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 103 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
A European Border and Coast Guard is hereby set up to ensure a European integrated border management at the EU external borders with a view to managing migration effectively and ensuring a high level of internal security within the Union, while safeguarding the free movement of persons therein.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 106 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘EU external borders’ means the land and sea borders of the Member States with third countries and their airports and seaports, to which the provisions of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council 38 apply; __________________ 38 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1).
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 113 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency and the national authorities of Member States which are responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks, shall constitute the European Border and Coast Guard missions.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency , by decision of the Management Board,shall establish an annual operational and technical strategy for the European integrated border management, taking into account, where justified, the specific situation of the Member States, in particular their geographical location. This strategy shall be in line with Article 4 of this Regulation. It shall promote and ensure the implementation of European integrated border management in all Member States.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) analysis of the risks for internal security and analysis of the threats that may affect the functioning or security of the EU external borders;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) cooperation with third countries in the areas of covered by this Regulation, focusing in particular on neighbouring countries and on those third countries which have been identified through risk analysis as being countries of origin and/or transit for irregular immigration in cooperation with the Commission and the EEAS;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall implement the European integrated border management as a shared responsibility of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency and of the national authorities responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 131 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall facilitatesupport the application of Union measures relating to the management of EU external borders by reinforcing, assessing and coordinating the actions of Member States in the implementation of those measures, and in return. Member States shall ensure the management of their section of the external borders, in their interests and in interest of all Member States which have abolished internal border control, in full compliance with Union law and in accordance with the technical and operational strategy referred to in Article 3(2), and in close cooperation with the Agency.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 137 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall be responsible for the management of the EU external borders in the cases foreseen in this Regulation, in particular where the necessary corrective measures based on the vulnerability assessment are not taken or in the event of disproportionate migratory pressure, rendering the control of the external borders ineffective to such an extent that it risks putting in jeopardy the functioning of the Schengen area.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 145 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In view of contributing to an efficient, high and uniform level of border control and uniform application of international standards for returns, the Agency shall perform the following tasks:
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 146 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) establish a monitoring and risk analysis centre with the capacity to monitor migratory flows and to carry out risk analysis as regards all aspects of integrated border management by making use of available resources such as the Union satellite center and situation center;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 147 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) carry out a vulnerability assessment including the assessment of the capacity of Member States to face threats and pressures at their external borders;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 148 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) assistprovide support to Member States in circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance at the external borders by coordinating and organising joint operations, taking into account that some situations may involve humanitarian emergencies and rescue at sea;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 153 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) support the development of common technical standards for equipment, especially for tactical level command, control and communication as well as technical surveillance to ensure interoperability at Union and national level;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 154 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point k
(k) set up pools of forced return monitors, forced return escorts and return specialists using resources allocated by member States;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 156 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point n
(n) participate inmonitor the development and management of research and innovation activities relevant for the control and surveillance of EU external borders, including the use of advanced surveillance technology such as remotely piloted aircraft systems and develop pilot projects regarding matters covered by this Regulation;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 159 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point q
(q) cooperate with the European Fisheries Control Agency and the European Maritime Safety Agency to support the national authorities carrying out coast guard functions by providing services, information and, where necessary, equipment and training, as well as by coordinating multipurpose operations;
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 161 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point r
(r) assist Member States and third countries in the context ofin their operational cooperation between themwith third countries in the fields of external border management and return.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States may continue cooperation at an operational level with other Member States and/or third countries at the EU external borders, including military operations on a law enforcement mission and in the field of return, where such cooperation is compatible with the action of the Agency.and in the field of return, Member States shall refrain from any activity which could jeopardise the functioning of the Agency or the attainment of its objectives.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 170 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
The Agency and the national authorities which are responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks, shall be subject to a duty to cooperate in good faith, and an obligation to exchange information.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 172 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency shall establish a monitoring and risk analysis centre with the capacitymake intelligence- driven use of available Union resources to monitor migratory flows towards and within the Union. For this purpose, the Agency shall, by a decision of the Management Board develop a common integrated risk analysis model, which shall be applied by the Agency and the Member States.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 181 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – title
Liaison officers in Member States and third countries
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 183 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency shall ensure regular monitoring of the management of the external borders through liaison officers of the Agency in Member States and third countries.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 184 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The Executive Director shall appointdraw expertsise from the staff of the Agency to be deployed as liaison officers. The Executive Directorliaison officers to be appointed and deployed in the member States and third countries. The Management Board shall, based on risk analysis and ion consultation with the Management Board, determina proposal of the Executive Director, decide the nature of the deployment, ,the Mmember State to which a liaison officer may be deployed and the duration of the deployment and notify its decisions to the Member State concerned. The Executive Director shall notifyconsult the Member State concerned ofn the appointment and shall determine, together with the Member State, the location of deploymentnature and duration of the deployment before making its proposal and on the tasks which are not covered by paragraph 3.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 193 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. The results of the vulnerability assessment shall be submitted to the Supervisory BoarMember State concerned, which shall advise the Executive Director on the measures to be taken by the Member States based on the results of the vulnerability assessment, and taking into account the Agency’s risk analysis and the results of the Schengen evaluation mechanism.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 195 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. The Executive Director shall adopt a drecisommendation setting out the necessary corrective measures to be taken by the Member State concerned, including by using resources under the Union financial instruments. The decision of the Executive Director shall be binding on the Member State and shall lay down the time-limit within which the measures are to be taken and laying down the time- limit within which the measures are to be taken. The Executive Director shall adopt this recommendation in an advisory capacity and the Member State concerned shall justify not implementing the recommendations.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 199 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6
6. Where a Member State does notis unable to adopt the necessary corrective measures within the time-limit set, the Executive Director shall refer the matter to the Management Board and notify the Commission. The Management Board shall adopt a decision setting out the necessary corrective measures to be taken by the Member State concerned, including the time-limit within which such measures shall be taken. If the Member State does not take the measures within the time-limit foreseen in that decision, fFurther action may be taken by the Commission in accordance with Article 18.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 203 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – title
Actions by the Agency at the EU external borders
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 211 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – title
Initiating joint operations and rapid border interventions at the EU external borders
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 216 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The Executive Director and the management board shall evaluate, approve and coordinate proposals for joint operations made by Member States. Joint operations and rapid border interventions shall be preceded by a thorough, reliable and up-to-date risk analysis, thereby enabling the Agency to set an order of priority for the proposed joint operations and rapid border interventions, taking into account the impact level to external border sections in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1052/2013 and the availability of resources.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 235 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Where a Member State does notis unable to take the necessary corrective measures in accordance with a decision of the Management Boardmeasures referred to in Article 12 (5) and (6) or in the event of disproportionate migratory pressure at the external border, rendering the control of the external borders ineffective to such an extent that it risks putting in jeopardy the functioning of the Schengen area, the Commission, after consulting the Agency, may adopt a decision by means of an implementing act, identifying the measures to be implemented by the Agency and requiring the Member State concerned to cooperate with the Agency in the implementation of those measures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 79(2).
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 241 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
5. The rapid reserve pool shall be a standing corps placed at the immediate disposal of the Agency and which can be deployed from each Member State within three working days from when the operational plan is agreed upon by the Executive Director and the host Member State. For that purpose, each Member State shall, on a yearly basis, make available to the Agency a number of border guards commensurate to at least 3% of the staff of Member States without land or sea external borders and 2% of the staff of Member States with land or sea external borders, andor other relevant staff which shall amount to a minimum of 1 500 border guards, corresponding to the profiles identified by the decision of the Management Board.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 251 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall at least on a monthly basisregularly inform the Agency of their planned national return operations, as well as of their needs for assistance or coordination by the Agency. The Agency shall draw up a rolling operational plan to provide the requesting Member States with the necessary operational reinforcement, including technical equipment. The Agency may, on its own initiative, include in the rolling operational plan the dates and destinations of return operations it considers necessary, based on a needs assessment. The Management Board shall decide, on a proposal of the Executive Director, on the modus operandi of the rolling operational plan.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 255 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4
4. The Agency may provide the necessary assistance and ensure, at the request of the participating Member States or a third country, or propose on its own initiative, the coordination or the organisation of return operations, during which a number of returnees subject to a third-country return decision are passed from this third country to another third country of return (‘mixed return operations’), provided that the third country that issued the return decision is bound by the European Convention on Human Rights and in line with the Union list of safe countries of origin established by Regulation .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. The participating Member States and the Agency must ensure that the respect of fundamental rights and the proportionate use of means of constraints are guaranteed during the whole removal operation, notably with the presence of forced return monitors and of third-country forced return escorts. __________________ 1aRegulation .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an EU common list of safe countries of origin for the purposes of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, and amending Directive 2013/32/EU.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 258 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall guarantee the protection of fundamental rights in the performance of its tasks under this Regulation in accordance with relevant Union law, in particular the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, relevant international law, including the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and obligations related to access to international protection, in particular the principle of non-refoulement. For that purpose, the Agency shall draw up and further develop and implement a Fundamental Rights Strategy.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 263 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2
2. In the performance of its tasks the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall ensure that no person is disembarked in, forced to enter, conducted to or otherwise handed over or returned to the authorities of a country in contravention of the principle of non-refoulement, or from which there is a risk of expulsion or return to another country in contravention of that principle.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 264 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 3
3. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall, in the performance of its tasks, take into account the special needs of childrenminors, especially if unaccompanied, victims of trafficking in human beings, persons in need of medical assistance, persons in need of international protection, persons in distress at sea and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 266 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 4
4. In the performance of its tasks, in its relations with Member States and in its cooperation with third countries, the Agency shall take into accountensure appropriate follow up to the reports of the Consultative Forum and the Fundamental Rights Officer.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 271 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency shall proactively monitor and contribute to research and innovation activities relevant for the control of the EU external borders, including the use of advanced surveillance technology such as remotely piloted aircraft systems, and for return. The Agency shall disseminate the results of that research to the Commission and the Member States. It may use those results as appropriate in joint operations, rapid border interventions, return operations and return interventions.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 278 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – title
AcquisitionUse of technical equipment
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 279 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency may acquire, itself or in co-ownership with ause technical equipment provided by Member States, or lease technical equipment to be deployed during joint operations, pilot projects, rapid border interventions, return operations, return interventions or technical assistance projects in accordance with the financial rules applicable to the Agency.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 280 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. The Agency may acquire technical equipment, such as fingerprinting equipment, by decision of the Executive Director in consultation with the Management Board. Any acquisition or leasing of equipment entailing significant costs to the Agency shall be preceded by a thorough needs and cost/benefit analysis. Any such expenditure shall be provided for in the Agency’s budget as adopted by the Management Board.deleted
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 281 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Agency acquires or leases major technical equipment, such as open sea and coastal patrol vessels, helicopters or other aircraft or vehicles the following conditions shall apply: (a) in case of acquisition by the Agency or co-ownership, the Agency shall agree with one Member State that that Member State shall provide for the registration of the equipment in accordance with the applicable legislation of that Member State; (b) in case of leasing, the equipment shall be registered in a Member State.deleted
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 282 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. On the basis of a model agreement drawn up by the Agency, the Member State of registration and the Agency shall agree on modalities ensuring the periods of full availability of the co-owned assetsequipment for the Agency, as well as on the terms of use of the equipment. Technical equipment owned solely by the Agency shall be made available to the Agency upon its request and the Member State of registration may not invoke the exceptional situation referred to in Article 38(4).
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 283 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 5
5. The Member State of registration or the supplier of technical equipment shall provide the necessary experts and technical crew to operate the technical equipment in a legally sound and safe manner.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 284 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency shall set up and keep centralised records of equipment in a technical equipment pool composed of equipment owned either by the Member States or by the Agency and equipment co- owned by the Member States and the Agency for external border control or return purposes.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 311 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1
1. In matters covered by its activities and to the extent required for the fulfilment of its tasks, the Agency, in agreement with the concerned Member State(s), shall facilitate and encourage operational cooperation between Member States and third countries, within the framework of the predefined operational plan, of the external relations policy of the Union and especially of the European neighborhood and development policy, including with regard to the protection of fundamental rights. The Agency and the Member States shall comply with norms and standards at least equivalent to those set by Union legislation also when cooperation with third countries takes place on the territory of those countries. The establishment of cooperation with third countries shall serve to promote European border management and return standards.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 317 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 3
3. In circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance, the Agency may , in agreement with the concerned Member State(s) ,coordinate operational cooperation between Member States and third countries in the field of management of the EU external borders, and it shall have the possibility of carrying out joint operationactivities at the external borders involving one or more Member States and a third country neighbouring at least one of those Member States, subject to the agreement of that neighbouring third country, including on the territory of that third country. The Commission, the EEAS, Eurojust and Europol shall be informed of such activities.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 325 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 5
5. The Agency may also, with the agreement of the Member States concerned invite observers from third countries to participate in its activities at the external borders referred to in Article 13,including in an observer capacity, return operations referred to in Article 27, return interventions referred to in Article 32 and training referred to in Article 35, to the extent that their presence is in accordance with the objectives of those activities, may contribute to improving cooperation and the exchange of best practices, and does not affect the overall safety of those activities. The participation of those observers may take place only with the agreement of the Member States concerned regarding the activities referred to in Articles 13, 27 and 35 and only with the agreement of the host Member State regarding those referred to in Article 13 and 32. Detailed rules on the participation of observers shall be included in the operational plan. Those observers shall receive the appropriate training from the Agency prior to their participation.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 335 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 9
9. The Agency shall inform the European Parliament of the activities referred to in paragraphs 2 and 31 to 5.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 339 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1
1. The Agency may deploy experts of its own staff as liaison officers, who should enjoy the highest possible protection to carry out their duties, in third countries. They shall form part of the local or regional cooperation networks of immigration liaison officers and security experts of the Union and of the Member States, including the network set up pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 377/2004.49 __________________ 49 Council Regulation (EC) No 377/2004 of 19 February 2004 on the creation of an immigration liaison officers network (OJ L 64, 2.3.2004, p. 1).
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 350 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 68 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Executive Director shall bePrior to his/her appointedment by the Management Board on the grounds of merit and documented high- level administrative and management skills, as well as senior professional experience in the field of management of the external borders and return, the Executive Director shall be heard by the appropriate bodies of the European Parliament. The Management Board shall take its decision by a two-thirds majority of all members with a right to vote.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 354 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall hold regular exchange of views with the competent bodies of the European Parliament and report on complaints and their follow-up.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 360 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. The Executive Director shall report to the Fundamental Rights Officer as to the findings and follow-up given by the Agency to a complaint
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 361 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 7
7. The Fundamental Rights Officer shall report toinform the Executive Director and to the Management Board as tof the findings andregarding the complaints deemed eligible. The Executive Director and the Management Board shall then report on the follow-up given to complaints by the Agency and the Member States.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 364 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
The Agency shall ensure that the standardized complaint form is available in most common languagesEU languages as well as in Arabic and in any other languages most commonly used and that it shall be made available on the Agency’s website and in hardcopy during all activities of the Agency. Complaints shall be considered by the Fundamental Rights Officer even when they are not submitted in the standardized complaint form.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 367 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
By three years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation to assess particularly the impact, effectiveness and efficiency of the Agency’s performance and its working practices in relation to its objectives, mandate and tasks. The evaluation shall, in particular, address the possible need to modify this regulation, the mandate of the Agency, and the financial implications of any such modification.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 369 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The evaluation shall include a specific analysis on the way the Charter of Fundamental Rights was complied with in the application of this Regulation as well as of cases of complaints and their handling.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 370 #

2015/0310(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The Executive Director shall hold regular exchanges of views with the appropriate bodies of the European Parliament, notably regarding specific cooperation with third countries, and shall present the annual report of the Agency.
2016/04/22
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2014/2214(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Is of the view that good and stable governance mechanisms are crucial in order to provide strategic direction, take key decisions and oversee effective implementation of EUSAIR; supports the strengthening of the involvement of all relevant stakeholders, including civil society, in implementation; considers it important to ensure adequate visibility of EUSAIR on all levels; calls for close cooperation with relevant European organisations and programmes with regard to migration challenges, including the South East Europe 2020 Strategy, and for the duplication or overlapping of activities to be avoided;
2015/06/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 35 #

2014/2214(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the fact that EUSAIR inadequately addresses issues of growing concern such as irregular and illegal migration and cross-border crime; while noting that major European migration and criminal flows pass through this part of Europe, calls for a major component on migration, movement of persons and cross-border crime to be included in EUSAIR;deleted
2015/06/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 38 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The experience gained with the application of the current schemes, together with the conclusions of the external evaluations and subsequent analysis of different policy options, point to the conclusion that the rationale which led to the establishmentcontinuation of the two school schemes is still relevantfully justified. In the current context of declining consumption of fruit and vegetables including bananas and milk products, exacerbated by amongst other things, the modern trend towards the consumption ofand of an increasing incidence of overweight among children as a result of consumption habits geared to highly processed foods which, additionally, are often high in added sugars, salt and fat, the Union aid to finance the supply to children in educational establishments of selected agricultural products should therefore continue to existdo more to promote healthy eating habits.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 59 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) A trend of declining consumption in particular of fresh fruit and vegetables including bananas and drinking milk has been identified. It is therefore appropriate to focus the distribution under the school schemes on these products as a priority. This would in turn also help reduce the organisational burden for schools, increase the impact of the distribution within a limited budget and would be in line with the current practice, as these products are most frequently distributed. However, in order to follow nutritional recommendations on calcium absorption, and given the increase in problems associated with intolerance of lactose in milk, provision should be made for a derogation so that certain other milk products, such as yoghurt and cheese, can also continue to be distributed under specific conditions.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 77 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Educational measures that support the distribution are necessary in order to make the scheme effective in reaching its short- and long-term objectives of increasing the consumption of selected agricultural products and shaping healthier diets. Considering their importance, these measures should support both the fruit and vegetables including bananas and milk distribution. They should be eligible for the Union aid. As supporting measures they represent a critical tool to reconnect children with agriculture and its different products and to meet the objectives that the scheme is pursuing, Member States should be allowed to include in their thematic measures a wider variety of agricultural products into their thematic measures, such as products derived from fruit and vegetables processed without the addition of sugar, salt, fat or sweeteners, and other local, regional or national specialities like honey, table olives and olive oil. However, so as to promote healthy eating habits, the national health authorities should be involved in this process and approve the list of these products, as well as the two groups of products eligible for the distribution, and decide on their nutritional aspects.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 87 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) In order to ensure a sound budgetary management, a fixed ceiling of the Union aid towards the distribution of fruit and vegetables including bananas and milk, supporting educational measures and related costs should be provided for. This ceiling should reflect the current situation. In light of the experience gained and with a view to simplify the management, the financing models should be approximated and based on a single approach as regards the level of Union financial contribution. It is therefore appropriate to limit the level of Union aid towards the price of products through a maximum Union aid per porchild and per distribution operation both for fruit and vegetables including bananas and for milk and to abolish the principle of obligatory co-financing for fruit and vegetables including bananas. Considering the price volatility of the products in question, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of measures setting the levels of the Union aid towards the price of a portion of products and laying down the definition of a portionceilings for the Union aid.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 104 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure the efficient and targeted use of Union funds, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of measures fixing the indicative allocations of the Union aid to each Member State and the methods for reallocating aid between Member States on the basis of aid requests received. The indicative allocations should be fixed separately for the fruit and vegetables including bananas and milk in line with the voluntary approach to distribution. The allocation key for fruit and vegetables including bananas should reflect the current allocations by Member States, based on the objective criteria of the number of children in the age group of six- to ten-year olds as a proportion of the population, taking into the account also the development status of regions concerned. In order to allow Member States to maintain the scale of their current programmes and with a view of encouraging others to take up the distribution of milk, it is appropriate to use the combination of two keys for the allocation of the funds for milk, namely the historical use of funds by Member States under the School Milk Scheme-except in the case of Croatia, for which a specific fixed amount needs to be determined- and the objective criteria of the number of children in the age group of six- to ten-year olds as a proportion of the population used for the fruit and vegetables including bananas. In order to find the right proportion for these two keys, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of adopting additional rules concerning the balance between the two criteria, including setting a minimum level of spending of the Union aid per child per year. Furthermore, considering the recurrent changes in the demographic or development situation of regions in Member States, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of assessing every three years whether the Member States' allocations, based on those criteria, are still up to date.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 116 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) To simplify the administrative and organisational procedures for the schools taking part in the two programmes, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission, in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in respect of the introduction of single procedures for schools’ applications to participate and for monitoring.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 119 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) The national strategy should be considered as the condition for the Member State's participation in the scheme and as a strategic multiannual document, setting out targets to be achieved by Member States and their priorities. To simplify procedures and reduce the administrative burden on national authorities, the national strategies should be submitted every six years. Member States should be allowed to update them regularly, in particular in light of the evaluations and reassessment of priorities or targets.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 171 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. Member States wishing to participate in the aid scheme established in paragraph 1 (“the school scheme”) may distribute either fruit and vegetables including bananas or milk falling within CN code 0401, or both. By way of derogation from the provisions of the first paragraph and in accordance with paragraph 7, Member States may also distribute other milk products covered by Annex Va.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 184 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall, in order to make the school scheme effective, also provide for the supporting educational measures, which may include measures and activities aimed at connecting children with agriculture and the distribution of a wider variety of agricultural products, and educating about related issues, such as healthy eating habits, combating food waste, local food chains or organic farming.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 196 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 – paragraph 5
5. When drawing up their strategies, Member States shall determine a list of agricultural products, in addition to fruit and vegetables, bananas and milk, that may occasionally be included for distribution under the supporting educational measures. With regard to processed fruit, and vegetables, the products listed in Annex V may not be distributed. With regard to dairy products other than milk, the list of authorised products is drawn up in line with Annex Va.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 218 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 – paragraph 7
7. Member States shall, in order to promote healthy eating habits, to be followed also by children with lactose intolerance, ensure that their competent health authorities endorse the list of all the products supplied under the school scheme and decide on their nutritional aspects in line with Annexes V and Va.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 229 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 a –paragraph 1– subparagraph 2
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 227 determining the level of Union aid that may be paid towards the price of the portion of fruit and vegetables including bananas and milk distributed and laying down the definition of a portion. The Commission shall also be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 227 fixing a minimum amount and a maximum amount for the financing of supporting educational measures from Member States' annual definitive allocations.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 235 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 a – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Member States shall ensure that a minimum of 15% of their annual allocation is earmarked for educational measures.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 265 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 a – paragraph 2 – point b
b) for milk: with the exception of Croatia, the historical use of funds under previous schemes for the supply of milk and milk products to children and objective criteria based on their proportion of six- to ten-year old children. For Croatia, the historical criterion shall be replaced by flat-rate payments. In order to guarantee a fair distribution of funds to each member State and each child and ensure that member States are able adequately to meet the objective of encouraging children to drink milk, it is necessary to establish a minimum annual amount of Union aid per child in the age group referred to above.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 277 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 a – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States shall ensure that a minimum of 15% of their annual allocation is earmarked for educational measures.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 292 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 a – paragraph 4
4. Without exceeding the global ceiling of EUR 230 million resulting from the amounts referred to under points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1, Member States may transfer up to 150% of their indicative allocations for fruit and vegetables including bananas or for milk to the other sector under the conditions to be specified by the Commission by means of delegated acts adopted in accordance with Article 227.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 309 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 a – paragraph 8
8. Member States participating in the school scheme shall publicise, at the places where the food is distributed, their involvement in the scheme and the fact that it is subsidised by the Union, for example, by putting up posters at school entrances. A common identifier and Union logo shall be used on all accompanying information material. Member States shall ensure the added value and the visibility of the Union school scheme in relation to the provision of other meals in educational establishments.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 319 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. In order to ensure the efficient and targeted use of European funds, ensure their fair distribution between the Member States and limit the administrative workload for schools taking part in the scheme and for Member States, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 227 concerning:
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 321 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point - a (new)
-a) the maximum amount of Union aid per child and per distribution operation by way of contribution to the cost of the distributed fruit and vegetables, including bananas and milk;
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 322 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
-aa) the maximum percentage of total annual allocations to Member States to the earmarked for accompanying educational measures;
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 329 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) the indicative allocation of aid between Member States for fruit and vegetables including bananas and milk and where appropriate its revision following the assessment referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 23a(2), the minimum amount of annual Union aid spent per child referred to in Article 23 a (2)(b), the minimum amounts of Union aid for each Member State, the method for reallocating the aid allocation between Member States based on aid applications received, and the additional rules concerning how the criteria referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 23a(2) shall be taken into account for the allocation of the funds,
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 337 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
c a) the introduction of single application procedures for educational establishments seeking to participate and single control procedures;
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 343 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 24 – paragraph 3– introductory part
3. In order to promote awareness of the school scheme and heighten the visibility of Union aid, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 227, requiring Member States with a school scheme to publicise the subsidising role of the Union aid.regarding:
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 344 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 24 – paragraph 3– point a (new)
a) the stipulation that Member States having introduced schemes for schools shall publicise the fact that they are receiving Union assistance;
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 345 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point b (new)
b) the establishment of specific criteria regarding the presentation, composition, size and design of the common identifier and Union logo.
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 355 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 217 – subparagraph 1
Member States may, in addition to Union aid provided for in Article 23, make national payments for supplying the products to children, together with accompanying educational measures, in educational establishments or for the related costs referred to in Article 23(1)(c).
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 358 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 225 – point b a (new)
7 a) In Article 225, the following point is inserted: "b a) by 31 December 2018, on the possibility of reviewing the criteria for the allocation of funds to the member States by way of aid for the distribution of agricultural products to educational establishments in line with more objective criteria, such as consumption statistics by product type and age bracket; the report shall be accompanied by any appropriate proposal."
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 361 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Annex V
8) Annex V is deletedamended as follows: "ANNEX V LIST OF PRODUCTS EXCLUDED FROM THE DISTRIBUTION OF PROCESSED FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO SCHOOLS IN CONNECTION WITH EDUCATIONAL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 23 (5) Products containing any of the following: -added sugar -added fat, -added salt -added sweeteners".
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 366 #

2014/0014(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
8 a) The following annex shall be inserted: "ANNEX Va LIST OF OTHER DAIRY PRODUCTS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 23 (1) -Buttermilk, curdled milk, yoghurt, kefir and other fermented or acidified milk and cream falling within CN code 0403, excluding those containing added flavouring or non-lactic materials falling within CN codes 0403 10 51 to 99 and 0403 90 71 to 99; -cheese and curd falling under CN code 0406; -lactose-free milk consisting of natural milk whose composition has been changed with respect to its lactose content and not containing other non-lactic matter falling under CN code 0404 90.".
2015/02/05
Committee: AGRI