BETA

21 Amendments of Georgios EPITIDEIOS related to 2016/0225(COD)

Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Building on the existing initiatives, a stable and reliable Union Resettlement Framework should be established for the resettlement of persons in need of international protection to be implemented in accordance with annual Union resettlement plans and targeted Union resettlement schemes which effectively deliver on Member States' concrete commitments. The national rules of Member States shall take precedence over the Resettlement Framework.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Such a framework is a necessary part of a well-managed migration policy to reduce divergences among national resettlement practices and procedures, provide for the legal and safe arrival to the territory of the Member States only of third- country nationals and stateless persons in need of international protection, help reduce the risk of a large-scale irregular inflow of third-country nationals and stateless persons to the territory of the Member States and thereby reducing the pressure of spontaneous arrivals on the Member States' asylum systems, be an expression of solidarity with countries in regions to which or within which a large number of persons in need of international protection has been displacgathered by helping to alleviate the pressure on those countries, and help achieve the Union's foreign policy objectives by increasing the Union's leverage vis-à-vis third countries, and effectively contribute to global resettlement initiatives through speaking with one voice in international fora and with third countries.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to help reduce the risk of a large-scale irregular inflow of third- country nationals and stateless persons to the territory of the Member States, show solidarity with countries in regions to which or within which a large number of persons in need of international protection has been displaced by helping to alleviate the pressure on those countries, and help achieve the Union's foreign policy objectives, the regions or third countries from which resettlement is to occur should fit in a tailored engagement with third countries to better manage migration as foreseen in the Commission's Communication of 7 June 2016 on Establishing a new Partnership Framework with third countries under the European Agenda on Migration32. _________________ 32deleted COM(2016) 377 final.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Both types of procedure consist of the following stages: identification, registration, assessment and, decision and execution of decision.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) An expedited procedure should be established with the same level of security checks as in the ordinary procedure in order to speed up the procedures of refoulement and the allocation of applicants and those who have been granted asylum according to the planned quota to all EU countries. However, in the expedited procedure, the assessment of the international protection needs of third- country nationals or stateless persons should be limited to an assessment of their eligibility for subsidiary protection without assessing their qualification for refugee status.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The resettlement procedure should be concluded as soon as possible in order to discourage persons in need of international protection to use irregular ways to enter the European Union to seek protection. Furthermore, measures should be taken to avoid concentrating large numbers of applicants within the territory of the country of entry which is likely to lead to pressure also to grant asylum to those with no claim to it. At the same time it should ensure that Member States have sufficient time for a full and adequate examination of each case. The time-limits should correspond to what is necessary to make the different types of assessment foreseen for the ordinary and expedited procedure.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) Any personal data collected for the purpose of the resettlement procedure should be stored for a maximum period of five years from the date of resettlement. Given that third-country natioequal to the longest period of limitation for criminals or stateless persons who have already been resettled by onffences provided by the legislation of the Member State orin who during the last five years refused to resettle to a Member State should be excluded from resettlement to another Member State, that period should be considered a necessary period for the storage of personal details, including fingerprints and facial imagesich the application for asylum or subsidiary protection had originally been submitted, from the date of resettlement.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the Union Resettlement Framework, implementing powers should be conferred on the Council for establishing the annual Union resettlement plan, fixing the maximum total number of persons to be resettled, the details about the participation of the Member States in the plan and their contributions to the total number of persons to be resettled, as well as overall geographical priorities.deleted
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the Union Resettlement Framework, the Commission should be empowered to establish targeted Union resettlement schemes laying down the precise number out of the total number of persons to be resettled and participation of the Member State, consistent with the annual Union Resettlement plan which should take account of capacity of each State to absorb asylum seekers. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers34. The examination procedure should be used for establishing targeted Union resettlement schemes given that those schemes have substantial implications. The Commission should aim to establish targeted Union resettlement schemes as soon as possible after the adoption of the annual Union resettlement plan and whenever necessary during the period covered by the annual Union resettlement plan. The Commission should take into account the discussions within the High-Level Resettlement Committee. _________________ 34 OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) Resettled persons should be granted international protection. Accordingly, the provisions on the content of international protection contained in the asylum acquis should apply as of the moment when resettled persons arrive on the territory of the Member States, including the rules to discourage secondary movement of beneficiaries of international protection.deleted
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) This Regulation does not affect the ability of the Member States to adopt or implement national resettlement schemes, which do not jeopardise the attainment of the Union’s objectives under this Regulation, for example where they contribute an additional number of resettlement places to targeted Union resettlement schemes established under this Regulation going beyond their contribution to the maximum number of persons to be resettled under the annual Union resettlement pla operating in the Union.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) (i) third-country nationals, who, owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership of a particular social group, are outside the country of nationality or the part of that country in which they formerly habitually resided, and are unable or, owing to such fear, are unwilling to avail themselves of the protection of that countrto stay in their country of nationality, or stateless persons, who, being outside of the country of former habitual residence or of the part of that country in which they formerly habitually resided, for the same reasons as mentioned above, are unable tor, owing to such fear, unwilling to return to or stay in it, or, failing that,
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) third-country nationals, who are outside the country of nationality or the part of that country in which they formerly habitually resided, or stateless persons, who are outside of the country of former habitual residence or of the part of that country in which they formerly habitually resided, and in respect of whom substantial grounds have been shown for believing that they, if returned to or staying in their country of origin or former habitual residence, would face a real risk of suffering serious harm and risk their lives, and are unable, or, owing to such risk, are unwilling to avail themselves of the protection of that country;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i – indent 6
– persons with socio-economic vulnerability;deleted
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – indent 1
– the spouse or unmarried partner in a stable relationship, where the law or practice of the Member State concerned treats unmarried couples in a way comparable to that of married couples under its law relating to third-country nationals or stateless persons;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – indent 3
– the father, mother or another adult responsible for the unmarried minor to be resettled, whether by law or by the practice of the Member State where the adult is present;deleted
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – indent 4
– the sibling or siblings of the third- country nationals or stateless persons to be resettldeleted;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – indent 5
– third-country nationals or stateless persons to be resettled who are dependent on their child or parent for assistance as a result of pregnancy, a newborn child, serious illness, severe disability or old age, provided that family ties existed in the country of origin, that the child or parent is able to take care of the dependent person and that the persons concerned expressed their desire in writing;deleted
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall store the data referred to in paragraphs 2 to 4 for five years from the date of resettlementa maximum period equal to the longest period of limitation for criminal offences provided by the law, as determined by the national legislation of the Member State in which an application for asylum was submitted.
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Upon expiry of that period, Member States shall erase the data. Member States shall erase data relating to a person who has acquired citizenship of any Member State before the expiry of that period as soon as the Member State becomes aware that the person concerned has acquired such citizenship.deleted
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Where the Commission implementing act adopting a targeted Union resettlement scheme provides for an expedited procedure, and by way of derogation from Article 10, Member States: (1) shall not assess whether the third- country nationals or the stateless persons meet the requirements referred to in point (a)(i) of Article 5; (2) shall not require UNHCR to assess whether the third-country nationals or the stateless persons qualify as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the 1951 Geneva Convention; (3) shall take a decision on resettlement as soon as possible and not later than four months from a third-country national's registration referred to in Article 10(2); the Member States may extend that time- limit of four months by a period of not more than two months, where complex issues of fact or law are involved. (4) shall grant the third-country nationals or the stateless persons concerned subsidiary protection status. The subsidiary protection status granted on the basis of point (4) shall be considered to have been terminated where a final decision has been taken on an application for international protection made by the beneficiary of that status.Article 11 deleted Expedited procedure
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET