Activities of Eleftherios SYNADINOS related to 2015/2233(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Negotiations for the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) (A8-0009/2016 - Viviane Reding) EL
Amendments (3)
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
(c) to ensure that personal data can be transferred outside the Union only if the provisions on third-country transfers in EU data protection laws are complied with; to negotiate on provisions which touch upon the flow of personal data only if the full application of EU data protection rules is guaranteed and respected, in accordance with the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data and the relevant case law established further to Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) to keep in mind that EU rules on the transfer of personal data may prohibit the processing of such data in third countries if they do not meet the EU adequacy standard; to insist that any requirements for the localisation of data processing equipment and establishments be in line with EU rules on data transfers;, to ensure the creation of appropriate supervisory authorities and the establishment of central data access points and to cooperate with third countries in the appropriate settings with a view to adopting adequate high data protection standards around the world;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) to show full regard for the need for transparency and accountability in the negotiations throughout the entire process, and to fulfil its obligation under Article 218(10) TFEU, which a recent Court of Justice ruling confirmed as being of statutory character2, to keep Parliament fully informed on an immediate basis at all stages of the negotiations; to ensure public access to relevant negotiation documents from all parties, with the exception of those which are to be classified with clear justification on a case-by-case basis, with a public justification of the extent to which access to the undisclosed parts of the document in question is likely to specifically and actually undermine the interests protected by the exceptions, in line with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents3; and Article 42 TFEU concerning the right of access to documents, to ensure that the agreement in no way weakens the laws of the EU or of its Member States on public access to official documents. __________________ 2 Case C-658/11 Parliament v Council, judgment of 24 June 2014. 3 OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43. OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.