8 Amendments of Massimiliano SALINI related to 2017/2087(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas ecodesign brings economic benefits for industry and consumers and contributes to the Union’s climate, energy and circular economy policies;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recommends that more consumer products are included within the scope of the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC); emphasises that priority should be given to ICT products, which are sold in large numbers and replaced frequently; highlights, in particular, the urgent need to improve the sustainability of mobiles/smartphones;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the need to adopt measurable and enforceable product requirements fully harmonised at Union level and supported by harmonised standards, in order to preserve the functioning of the Internal Market and ensure protection and fair competition;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the Commission to support innovation, research and the competitiveness of European manufacturers protecting European Property Rights, trade secrets, confidential business information and know-how in further Ecodesign implementation;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the ecodesign criteria to be broadened to includesystematically assessing resource efficiency, parameters for the circular economy and health; considers it necessary to assess combineing resource efficiency and circularity of materials with continuous energy savings; stresses that energy should be considered a key resource and that products should be optimised for both energy consumption and material use; believes that focusing on the criteria of from a lifecycle perspective; believes that durability, upgradability, reparability and recyclability willcan also provide a unique opportunity forsupport job development;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to optimise and safeguard the decision-making process; emphasises that ecodesign measures should be adopted individually and within the deadlines; calls on the Commission to justify delays and to set aside the necessary resources for implementation; believes, in addition, that voluntary agreements should no longer be given priority;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Insists on the need to optimise the market surveillance of products placed on the market through better cooperation between the Commission and the Member States, and among the Member States themselves, and to consider certification by an independent body (third-party certification); stresses that test protocols should be closer to real-life conditions;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the development ofsuggests that synergies with EU structural fuand ing so thatvestment funds could be considered in the future by Member States canto ensure adequate monitoring of policy development, undertake market surveillance, consult at national level and design proactive communication strategies.