5 Amendments of Philippe LOISEAU related to 2014/2228(INI)
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
a. prioritise an ambitious and balanced result of the negotiations for agriculture, the three main components of which (market access, geographical indications and sanitary and phytosanitary measures) should be tackled early and in parallel in the negotiation process, in order to give Parliament enough time to discuss and evaluate this chapter with stakeholders and European citizensensure that agricultural products, in particular meat, are taken off the table at the TTIP negotiations without delay;
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
b. firmly commit to the strict preservation of standards on food safety and human and animal health, as defined under EU legislation, and ensure that fundamental values of the EU such as the precautionary principle are not undermined, and to reject the agreement if they are;
Amendment 142 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
c. ensure a positive final outcome of the negotiations for agriculture reflecting both the offensive and defensive interests of the EU agricultural sector concerning the abolition or reduction of both tariff and non-tariff barriers, including in particular sanitary and phytosanitary standards and procedures, so that EU producers make genuine gains in terms of access to the US market; stresses that these sanitary and phytosanitary standards and procedures must not be lowered below the level which currently prevails in the European Union, and must not be covered by the legal arrangements which will govern the agreement after its signature;
Amendment 197 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
e. secensure significantly improved protection ofthat EU geographical indications, and better consumer informs currently defined, cannot be altered in any way during the negotiation as an essential element of a balanced agreement, taking the relevant chapter of the CETA with Canada as a good exampld that they are not covered by the legal arrangements which will govern the agreement after its signature;
Amendment 222 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
fa. halt the negotiations if the previous points are not taken into account.