3 Amendments of Elmar BROK related to 2009/2216(INI)
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Fully supports the Minsk Group Co- chairs’ mediation efforts, the Madrid Principles and the Moscow Declaration; condemns the idea of a military solution and calls on both sides to avoid militant rhetoric; furthermore calls on both sides to show more constructive ambition in the peace talks and to abandon the tendency to prefer perpetuatinge the status quo created through military conquestsfrontation in defiance of UN Security Council resolutions; calls on the EU, FN and the rest of the international community likewiseto do their utmost to show courage and political will to overcome the remaining sticking points which hinder anassist the parties to reach a peace agreement;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that interim status for Nagorno- Karabakh could imply interim legitimisation of the de facto authorities there; believes that inter alia in order to raise their credibility with a view to such a prospect, these authorities should rapidly abandonoffer a solution until the final status will be determined; believes that the positions that Nagorno- Karabakh includes all Armenian-occupied Azerbaijani lands and that displaced persons’ right of return cannot even be discussed at the present stageshould rapidly be abandoned; calls on the Government of Armenia to exercise its influence in this respect and on the Council and Commission to join this call;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the protocols on the establishment and development of diplomatic relations, border opetween Armeninga and cooperationTurkey, which i.e. foresee the prospect for the opening of the joint border; calls on both sides to seize this opportunity to mend their relations through ratification and implementation without preconditions and in reasonable timeframe; does not support the introduction of conditions for ratification not mentioned in the protocols, but; notes that if implemented, they will have wide- ranging, potentially overall very positive consequences in the region and that they can therefore not be seen in isolation; calls on Armenia, as well as Azerbaijan, to intensify their efforts in the Minsk Co- chairs-led talks on the principles for a settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflictwhole region of South Caucasus;