8 Amendments of Gilles PENNELLE
Amendment 4 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of thethat only EUR 53,75 billion in commitments and EUR 51,12 billion in payment for agriculture; regrets the decrease compared to 2024 and calls for a budget increase considering the challenges farmers will face in 2025 and promises made by the Commission following the protest movements, which it must now fully honour;
Amendment 15 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reminds that farmers and rural communities are key actors in food quality, security and affordability and the preservation of rural areas;
Amendment 24 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Deplores the ongoing negative cascade effects Russia’s war against Ukraine has on European agriculture, such as high input prices, inflation or market disturbances; regrets that some of these disruptions were caused by the EU's own decisions, which allowed Ukrainian products to enter its market without worrying about quotas or unfair competition;
Amendment 40 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Deplores the CAP budget cut in the MFF revision and calls for a CAP budget increase in the next MFF to ensure food security and a fair income for farmers, as was promised after the protests;
Amendment 58 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the recent CAP simplification package and notes it has no budgetary impact; calls for additional measures and resources to address a clear answer to the causes of farmers’ discontent across the EU;
Amendment 73 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for the strengthening of support measures for young and new farmers;
Amendment 81 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to provide sufficient funding for the agricultural reserve to safeguard food security and food sovereignty;
Amendment 102 #
2024/0176(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Deplores the excessive bureaucracy of the CAP and the difficult application of some rules on conditionality with inevitable repercussions on the effectiveness of expenditure;