16 Amendments of Linnéa ENGSTRÖM related to 2015/2092(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the reform of the common fisheries policy (CFP) included among its objectives the achievement of maximum sustainable yield (MSY), using an ecosystem-based approach; whereas technical measures and multiannual plans, which are concerned with conservation, are the main tools to achieve these objectiveso restore and maintain populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield (MSY), using an ecosystem-based approach;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the main changes introduced under the 2013 CFP reform also include discard eliminthe landing obligation and regionalisation;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the discard ban and maximum sustainable yield objectiveachieving the objectives of the new CFP require the use of more selective fishing gears and practices;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the failure of the Council to adopt a clear position has prevented the alignment of legislation regarding technical measures with the Treaty of Lisbon; whereas, following the CFP reform, the deadlock is apparently being resolved through delegated acts adopted by the Commission on the proposal of Member States;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas codecision is not necessary for measures taken at regional level and based on standards and objectives decided by the co-legislators or subject to frequent changes, but must be used for the adoption of rules that are common to all sea basins or not likely to be amended in the foreseeable future;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas the adoption of technical measures on a regional basis should follow the model agreed by the co-legislators under the new common fisheries policy, namely for adoption by the Commission of delegated acts on the basis of joint recommendations from the Member States concerned that meet the standards and objectives decided by the co-legislators, or, if the concerned Member States do not submit a joint recommendation within the designated time, on the Commission's own initiative;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital T
Recital T
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital U
Recital U
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AA
Recital AA
AA. whereas the plans must set a general objective that is achievable in administrative and scientific terms; whereas it should include high and stable yields while maintaining stocks above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield, something which must be reflected in annual Council decisions regarding fishing opportunities in the light of the latest scientific intelligence; whereas these annual decisions should be strictly confined to the allocation of fishing opportunities, and should as far as possible seek to avoid large fluctuations in this respect;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AE
Recital AE
AE. whereas, in the absence of multiannual plans, minimum conservation reference sizes may be modified under discard plans adopted by the Commission in delegated acts on the recommendations of the Member States concerned;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that technical measures must be reviewed in a bid to improve selectivity, reduce discards and the impact of fishing on the environment, simplify and standardise current rules, improve the scientific base and make it more consistent and more acceptable to the fisheries sector;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it necessary to maintain the co-decision procedure for the adoption of rules common to all sea basins, including the establishment of standards and objectives for technical measures, or for those are not likely to be amended within the foreseeable future;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that rules regarding technical measures should be structured on three co- decisional axes and a fourth regionalisation axis. The first three would comprise a set of common centralised rules including common objectives and standards to apply throughout the EU, a set of specific rules for the larger sea basins and a number of specific technical regulations, all off which would be adopted by co- decision; Notes that regionalisation would apply to rules applicable at regional level or subject to frequent changes
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Maintains that it is necessary to devise future multiannual plans for achievingrestoring and maintaining stocks at levels above those that can produce the maximum sustainable yield, including an advance timetable, a conservation safeguard trigger, a mechanism for adapting to changes in scientific thinking and a review clause;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17