Activities of Tom VANDENKENDELAERE related to 2022/0278(COD)
Plenary speeches (1)
Single market emergency instrument (debate)
Amendments (10)
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The advisory group shall be composed of one representative from each Member State. Each Member State and one representative from umbrella orgisations of economic operators at Union level. Each Member State and umbrella organisation of economic operators at Union level shall nominate a representative and an alternate representative.
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall chair the advisory group and ensure its secretariat. The Commission mayshall invite a representative of the European Parliament, representatives of EFTA States that are contracting parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area49 , representatives of economic operators, stakeholder organisations, social partners and experts, to attend meetings of the advisory group as observers. It shall invite the representatives of other crisis-relevant bodies at Union level as observers to the relevant meetings of the advisory group. __________________ 49 OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. For the purpose of contingency planning under Articles 6 to 8, the advisory group shall assist and advise, in close cooperation with the Commission as regards, perform the following tasks:
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. For the purpose of of the Single Market vigilance mode as referred to in Article 9, the advisory group shall assist, in close cooperation with the Commission in, perform the following tasks:
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point f a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point f a (new)
(f a) consult the representatives of economic operators, including SMEs, to collect specific market information;
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. For the purposes of the Single Market emergency mode as referred to in Article 14, the advisory group shall assist, in close cooperation with the Commission in, perform the following tasks:
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point a
(a) analysing crisis-relevant information gathered by Member States or, the Commission or representative umbrella organisations of economic operators at Union level;
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) establishing, based on sufficient and reliable evidence, whether the criteria for activation or deactivation of the emergency mode have been fulfilled;
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 9
Article 4 – paragraph 9
9. The advisory group may adopt opinions, recommendations, decisions or reports in the context of its tasks set out in paragraphs 4 to 6.
Amendment 848 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Where the economic operator to which the decision referred to in paragraph 2 is addressed declines to accept the requirement to accept and prioritise the orders specified in the decision, it shall provide to the Commission, within 130 days from the notification of the decision, a reasoned explanation setting out duly justified reasons why it is not possible or appropriate, in light of the objectives of this provision, for it to comply with the requirement. Such reasons include the inability of the operator to perform the priority rated order on account of insufficient production capacity or a serious risk that accepting the order would entail particular hardship or economic burden for the operator, or other considerations of comparable gravity. These reasons could entail the legitimate aims of the undertaking concerned and the cost, effort, technical practicality, and long-term business consequences, required for any change in production sequence.