4 Amendments of Gunnar BECK related to 2020/2018(INL)
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that since the online activities of individuals allow for deep insights into their personality and make it possible to manipulate them,big data aggregation and information engineering tools, such as natural language processing allow for mapping personal preferences and consumer behaviour and could potentially influence them: suggest that the collection and use of personal data concerning the use of digital services should be subjected to a specific privacy framework and limited to the extent necessary to provide and bill the use of the service;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that automated tools are unot always able to differentiate illegal content from content that is legal in a given context; highlights that human review of automated reports by service providers does not solve this problem as private staff lack the independence, qualification and accountability of public authorities; stresses, therefore, that the Digital Services Act shcould explicitly prohibit any obligation onset out the terms for hosting service providers or other technical intermediaries to use automated tools for content moderation, and refrain from imposing notice-and- stay-down mechanisms; insists that content moderation procedures used by providers should not lead to any ex-ante control measures based on automated tools or upload-filtering of content;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the responsibility for enforcing the law, deciding on the legality of online activities and ordering hosting service providers to remove or disable access to illegal content as soon as possible should rest with independent judicial authorities; considers that only a hosting service provider that has actual knowledge of illegal content and its illegal nature should be subject to content removal obligations;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the spread of false and racist information on social media should be contained by giving usersusers should have control over social media content proposed to them; stresses that users should be able to opt out of curating content on the basis of tracking user actions should require the user’s consent; proposes that users of social networks should have a right to see their timeline in chronological order; suggests that dominant platforms should provide users with an API to have content curated by software or services of their choice;