1711 Amendments of Jordi SOLÉ
Amendment 1 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the report of the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change of 15 June 2023 entitled ‘Scientific advice for the determination of an EU-wide 2040 climate target and a greenhouse gas budget for 2030-2050’,
Amendment 5 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU is a party to the Paris Agreement and has committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 % by 2030 compared to 1990 levels and to achieving climate neutrality by 2050; whereas the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change recommends reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 95% by 2040 compared to 1990 levels;
Amendment 6 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas hydrogen can be usedtechnologies have extremely variable readiness levels along their value chain, with low technology readiness levels for transport and selected uses such as combustion; whereas hydrogen uses, including as a feedstock, a fuel or, an energy carrier and has the potential to decarbonisor as energy storage, differ in terms of energy efficiency, cost efficiency and greenhouse gas emission abatement potential; whereas renewable hydrogen should be prioritised in applications where no more energy or cost-efficient alternatives are available, such as no-regret uses in the hard-to- abate industriesal and heavy transport sectors;
Amendment 10 #
2023/2123(INI)
Amendment 12 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Amendment 13 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the EU hydrogen strategy has set an objective of installing at least 40 GW of renewable hydrogen electrolysers and producing 10 million tonnes of renewable hydrogen in the EU by 2030 and the REPowerEU plan has proposed to complement this objective by importing the same amount of renewable hydrogen; whereas the vast majority of emission reduction scenarios analysed by the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change stay well below the target for domestic production of renewable hydrogen, and only one surpasses it;
Amendment 18 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas fuel cells and electrolysers require chemicals, technology-intensive components and several critical raw materials, in particular platinum-group metals, the main producers of which are not located in the EU; whereas these critical raw materials are often sourced from countries in which mining is linked to serious human rights violations, deterioration of governance, conflicts, and environmental degradation;
Amendment 22 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas a market for renewable hydrogen remains to be built and will require appropriate customer protection and significant investments; whereas price discovery is crucial for consolidating the foundations of this market, targeting public financial support where needed and allowing for effective regulatory oversight and public monitoring;
Amendment 33 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission communication on the European Hydrogen Bank (EHB); notes that the name ‘European Hydrogen Bank’ can be misleading, as this is not a bank but an initiative aiming to coordinate activities and financing to support renewable hydrogen projects, acting as a one-stop- shop for producers and off-takers; proposes therefore to rename it ‘European Renewable Hydrogen Platform’;
Amendment 40 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the only sustainable form of hydrogen is renewable hydrogen; notes that electrolysers account for less than 4 % of total hydrogen production in the EU; notes that low-carbon hydrogen could play a role during the transition to a net-zero economy;
Amendment 51 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that, to secure the EU’s industrial sovereignty in a context of open strategic autonomy, the EHB should strongly prioritise ramping up domestic production in closed industrial loops;
Amendment 59 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that hydrogen production via electrolysis is water- intensive; calls on the Commission and the Member States to pay specific attention to resource efficiency and to the Water Framework Directive, in particular for regions at risk of drought; advocates for further research on technologies for water desalinisation that minimise energy consumption and environmental impacts, particularly of brine pollution;
Amendment 63 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that Hydrogen Valleys can play an important role inas an instrument to support the decarbonisation of industrial districts, thus fostering innovation and contributing to the local economy;
Amendment 80 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Asks the Commission to consider complementary mechanisms such as grants, contracts for difference and carbon contracts for differencedemand-side mechanisms;
Amendment 87 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates the importance of geographical balance to enable the production and use of renewable hydrogen across the EU and to ensure that hydrogen is produced as closely as possible to its end users, avoiding unnecessary infrastructure development and risks of leakage during transport; calls on the Commission to develop regional auctions;
Amendment 91 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that the design of future auctions should restrict the sale of renewable hydrogen to no-regret applications in sectors where no more energy or cost efficient alternatives are available, including hard-to-abate industries and heavy transport, and specifically aviation and shipping;
Amendment 102 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Asks the Commission to not only consider price, but also to include a clear system of bonus points for the ranking of bids; notes that such a system should reward bids that deliver the highest level of sustainability or, energy efficiency and greenhouse gas abatement potential, and lead to significant job creation and promote high-quality traineeships and the reskilling or upskilling of workers;
Amendment 104 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recognises the urgent need to scale up the production of electrolysers in the EU; proposes differentiating between operating and capital expenditure; considers that potential support for capital expenditure on low-carbon hydrogen should only be directed towards investments that can contribute to the production of renewable hydrogen at a later stage, in particular the purchase of electrolysers, and should not cover operating expenditure on low-carbon hydrogen;
Amendment 107 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Takes note that the production costs of renewable hydrogen are expected to decrease, also thanks to public financing; recommends the Commission to identify a price ceiling under which there should not be further public financial support, and to introduce a clawback mechanism to reassess production costs at the end of each contractual arrangement, and at least every 5 years;
Amendment 114 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Subheading 2
Non-financial support for the EU hydrogen ecosystem within the EU energy transition
Amendment 115 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the Commission’s idea of launching the concept of ‘auctions as a service’; considers that this could lower the administrative costs for the Member States and promote a genuinely European pathway to the energy transition; encourages the Commission to explore its further development for other renewable energy technologies, providing additional incentives for Member States to participate and contribute;
Amendment 124 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 132 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that, despite an increase in the domestic production of renewable hydrogen, growing demand wouldmay require imports from non-EU countries;
Amendment 144 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Urges the Commission to prepare guidelines with clear and transparent criteria for the selection of producers from non-EU countries that would be eligible for support, based on geopolitical risks, alignment with EU values and commitment to sustainabilityvailability of resources for the domestic energy transition, alignment with EU values and environmental and social standards, including labour conditions and indigenous rights;
Amendment 149 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. StressRecalls that the EU energy diplomacy should promote the development of rules-based, transparent, and undistorted global hydrogen markets based on reliable international standards and certification schemes; stresses that the EU's hydrogen diplomacy should aim at enabling partner countries, globally and especially in the EU’s neighbourhood, to achieve their energy transitions and improve their environmental, social and democratic standards; underlines the importance of diversifying suppliers and maintaining a fair global playing field when providing support for renewable hydrogen production in non-EU countries; proposes requiring the use of the euro for imports of renewable hydrogen receiving EU support; urges the Union to reinforce its leadership in international standard setting and certification schemes for renewable hydrogen in close cooperation with like- minded partners, the International Energy Agency and the International Renewable Energy Agency;
Amendment 161 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Takes note of the budget of EUR 3 billion for the EHB that was announced in the 2022 State of the Union address; calls on the Commission to increase this budget as appropriate;
Amendment 169 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Asks the Commission to clarify the yearly budget available under each pillar of the EHB, prepare a road map of planned auctions and, where appropriate and compatible with the provisions under the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, make a legislative proposal for a financial instrument targeting imports from non-EU countries;
Amendment 177 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Takes note of the Commission’s proposal establishing the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (‘STEP’), where renewably hydrogen is identified as a critical clean technology requiring further support; asks for the highest level of synergy between the STEP and the EHB, avoiding duplications and possibly through the use of a single portal for renewable hydrogen producers and off-takers;
Amendment 180 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Welcomes the role of the EHB in increasing transparency on flows, transactions and prices in the emerging renewable hydrogen market; underlines that this function is crucial for increasing market confidence, strengthening regulatory oversight and public monitoring, and informing the integrated planning of energy infrastructure;
Amendment 187 #
Amendment 191 #
2023/2123(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Invites the Commission to reassess the hydrogen production targets for 2030 and reduce them by aligning with the emission reduction pathways identified by the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change;
Amendment 9 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas Parliament’s role as co- legislator and co-budgetary authority covers not only EU internal policies, but also to a large extent the external dimension of the EU’s action;
Amendment 10 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Parliament’s consent is required for the entry into force of most international agreements; whereas article 218(10) TFEU provides that the European Parliament shall be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure;
Amendment 11 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas Parliament scrutinises and discusses the conduct of EU external affairs, in particular through the work of its Committee on Foreign Affairs and its two subcommittees on Human Rights and on Security and Defence, as well as through its Committees on International Trade and on Development; whereas this scrutiny role includes matters pertaining to the adoption, implementation and review of EU thematic, regional and country strategies and other policy documents, financial assistance as well as appointments to senior positions within the EU external representation;
Amendment 16 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas Parliament has become one of the most active parliaments in terms of its parliamentary diplomatic activity and the resources devoted to it; whereas parliamentary diplomacy can contribute to the achievement of EU objectives and to the promotion of EU values and policies, thereby bringing added value by promoting more coherent and cohesive EU external action;
Amendment 21 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas Parliament holds public debates in plenary and in committees and adopts reports and resolutions, related to EU foreign and security policy and to the situation in third countries, notably regarding human rights, and thus contributes to raising public attention and discussion both within the EU, but also in the countries concerned; whereas such reports and resolutions are closely scrutinised by actors from third countries, including governments, parliaments, civil society and media;
Amendment 23 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas Parliament has a unique network of standing delegations covering the entire world;
Amendment 35 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the Inter-institutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 between the European Parliament and the Council concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of CSDP needs to be updated; whereas Article 36 TEU mandates the VP/HR to appear before Parliament at least twice a year to report on the current state of affairs regarding the CFSP/CSDP and to answer questions;
Amendment 36 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas thein addition to European Parliament ha's Liaison Offices (EPLOs) outside the EU, in New York, Addis Ababa and Jakarta, in addition to London and Washington in London and Washington, Parliament has antenna offices in New York, Addis Ababa and Jakarta;
Amendment 38 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas Parliament is an internationally recognised election observation actor; whereas Parliament's election observation delegations are embedded either in EU electoral observation missions (EOMs) or in international election observation missions (IEOMs);
Amendment 42 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas political groups and individual members of Parliament enjoy a dense and plural network of contacts with parliamentarians, government officials as well as with actors from the private sector and civil society in third countries, notably in EU accession countries and the EU neighbourhood;
Amendment 46 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Recital E c (new)
Ec. whereas Article 5(7) of the Decision establishing the EEAS (2010/427/EU) states that 'Union Delegations shall have the capacity to respond to the needs of other institutions of the Union, in particular the European Parliament, in their contacts with the international organisations or third countries to which the Delegations are accredited';
Amendment 89 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that Parliament’s official missions outside the EU form an integral part of EU external policy, which must therefore enjoy the full support of the EU delegations; considers that a better coordination, planning and priority- setting of these missions between the different Parliament’s bodies would increase the impact of Parliament’s diplomatic role and allow for a more efficient use of limited resources;
Amendment 106 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that the political dialogue carried out by Parliament with governmental, parliamentary and civil society actors across the world contributes to promoting EU views and values on global standards in areas such as climate and energy diplomacy, connectivity, artificial intelligence and digital and technological policies; stresses the importance that Parliament strives to reflect the diversity of the European Union, including in terms of gender and national origin, in the composition of all its external missions to non-EU countries ;
Amendment 113 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the consistent dedication of Parliament to placing human rights and democracy at the heart of EU external action and providing a key forum in which to hear and amplify the voice of civil society and democratic actors from around the world; highlights in this regard its actions in support of human rights defenders, parliamentarians at risk and participation of women in political life and the fight against disinformation, and calls for their further development in the next parliamentary term;
Amendment 118 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the importance and unique nature of Parliament’s democracy support programmes, such as the ‘Jean Monnet Dialogues for peace and democracy’ aimed at fostering a democratic parliamentary culture and facilitating institutional reform processes and consensus-building between political parties in non-EU countries;
Amendment 134 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Insists on Parliament’s right to information on CFSP matters under Article 36 TEU, including in terms of access to reports and country strategies and other confidential information guiding the conduct of EU foreign and security policy; in this respect, stresses the importance of finalising, as soon as possible, the update of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 November 2002 between the European Parliament and the Council concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy5 ; _________________ 5 OJ C 298, 30.11.2002, p. 1.
Amendment 139 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses that Parliament’s oversight function and power to monitor the negotiation and implementation of international agreements grants it a critical role in shaping the Union’s engagement with third countries and its overall action in the international arena; deplores in this regard so-called informal or ad hoc arrangements which do not require Parliament consent and hence undermine the Parliament’s authority as co-legislator and its oversight role;
Amendment 141 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Takes the view that EU Ambassadors in strategic countries and EU Special Representatives should only be confirmed after a positive evaluation by Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs;
Amendment 147 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for a further strengthening of Parliament’s relations with the Member States’ national parliaments, which are well-placed bodies to act as a relay towards Member States’ executive branches; underlines therefore that the Inter- parliamentary Conference (IPC) on the Common Foreign and Security Policy and Common Security and Defence Policy as well as the IPC held annually by the Human Rights Subcommittee provide a prime forum for the exchange of information and best practices between national parliaments and the European Parliament in the areas concerned and should be reinforced;
Amendment 151 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that Parliament has a unique role to play in bringing EU foreign policy closer to European citizens, in particular by engaging with sub-state entities such as regional governments and parliaments and thus allowing "sub-state diplomacy" to feed into and build on EU- level external action;
Amendment 155 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Takes the view that, in the context of backsliding in terms of respect for human rights and democracy worldwide, Parliament has a specific role to play in helping democratically elected parliaments globally to consolidate their institutional role and internal working methods and that it could offer targeted programmes to a wider range of parliaments, including from the “Global South”, building on past achievements;
Amendment 169 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Highlights the specific role of Parliament in helping partner countries and, in particular, enlargement countries to strengthen their role in the EU accession process, given the specific and key role the parliaments play in the process through, among other, legislative approximate, oversight and outreach to citizens;
Amendment 171 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Welcomes innovative approaches such as the Committee-to-Committee cooperation recently launched between the European Parliament and the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, and encourages the development of further initiatives in this field given the political importance of the enlargement process;
Amendment 175 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates its call to enhance the EU’s institutional capacities for conflict prevention and mediation, and believes that Parliament can provide expertise and a substantial contribution through its bodies and actions in this area, including by engaging with early warning mechanisms and on-site visits;
Amendment 192 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Considers that while Parliament should maintain its full autonomy in carrying out its external policy agenda, joint ad hoc visits and statements by Parliament alongside Commission and Council representatives in relation to key developments in non-EU countries offer a promising area for enacting the Team Europe approach; calls in this regard for an inter-institutional pilot programme of Team Europe to be launched in a selected number of third countries, where Parliament’s tools are fully integrated within a joined-up inter-institutional approach towards the countries concerned;
Amendment 193 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Insists that the EEAS and Member States take immediate and robust action, including up to sanctions, when Parliament's bodies or individual MEPs are targeted by restrictive measures from third countries;
Amendment 194 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24b. Reiterates its request for the VP/HR, in cooperation with the Member States and Parliament, to adopt an annual list of focus countries of serious concern in relation to the plight of human rights defenders and democracy activists, which would, inter alia, allow for a fully coordinated Team Europe practical response on the ground; believes that Parliament could play a decisive role through using its institutional and other means in support of this targeted and joined up approach;
Amendment 198 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Reiterates its call for more strategic coordination between EU institutions in relation to urgent individual human rights defenders (HRD) cases; is convinced that parliamentary diplomacy may prove an effective and complementary mechanism for engaging with non-EU countries on such cases; calls for an inter-institutional task force on HRDs to coordinate European efforts on priority HRD cases;
Amendment 199 #
2023/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls for the more systematic participation of the Chairs of the external committees of the Parliament in high level CFSP meetings and events, including the FAC; calls for joint EEAS/COM and EP delegations to major multilateral and regional gatherings;
Amendment 10 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The Programme is implemented by the PRIMA-implementation structure (PRIMA-IS), established in Barcelona, and this location has been instrumental to the effectiveness and efficiency of the Partnership.
Amendment 11 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Since the initial rationale and objectives of PRIMA partnership are still valid, especially, as Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has further destabilised already fragile Southern Mediterranean agriculture markets, making the transition to unpolluted natural resources and healthy, equitable, resilient and sustainable food systems an even more urgent priority for Mediterranean societies and the interim evaluation report20 concluded that PRIMA is a successful instrument with an added value for the Union, the Union should continue to provide financial support to allow PRIMA to fund research and innovation actions under the same thematic scope until 2027, and bring that instrument in synchronisation with the Union’s multiannual financial framework (MFF) and MFF-aligned programming cycles of R&I programmes. Moreover, the overall duration of PRIMA should be extended until 2031 to allow for the full implementation of supported research and innovation actions. _________________ 20 COM(2023) 285final
Amendment 13 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) According to the 6th Assessment Report of Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Mediterranean ecosystems are expected to be among the most impacted by the consequences of the progressing climate change. Therefore, the share of funding for climate-related projects must increase further.
Amendment 15 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Although the thematic scope of PRIMA should be maintained, changes are necessary in the management of the program. The assessment of the program reveals some potential for improvement. The success rate in Section 1 is so low that this may discourage potential applicants in the future. Additional resources, smaller but numerous projects, more tailored calls and further refinement of the call procedure in a two-stage call process could improve the situation and make participation in the Section 1 calls more attractive.
Amendment 16 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5 b (new)
Recital 5 b (new)
(5b) Another worrying finding of the interim assessment is that South Mediterranean Participating States (SM PS) received only 28% of total funds. It is imperative that PRIMA supports a range of research and innovation activities, including capacity building, training, awareness-raising and dissemination actions in order to increase the absorption rate of the SM PS.
Amendment 22 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The Union’s financial contribution to the PRIMA Partnership should be subject to a formal commitment by the Participating States to make a financial contribution at least at the level of the Union contribution. For that reason, compliance with the formal financial commitments should be closely monitored by the PRIMA implementation structure (PRIMA-IS) on a regular basis. The Commission should assess on a regular basis the fulfilment of commitments undertaken by the Participating States and, following this assessment, should be authorised to take appropriate measures, where necessary.
Amendment 25 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) To maximise the impact of the programme, as well as to utilise the value of science diplomacy, there is a need to strengthen communication and dissemination activities that would increase the awareness about the programme and ensure the broad diffusion of its results.
Amendment 35 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Decision (EU) 2017/1324
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
The Commission shall assess on an ongoing basis the fulfilment of commitments undertaken by the Participating States and, following this assessment, may take appropriate measures, including those in Article 9. particular the measures defined in Article 9, including the decision to terminate, reduce or suspend the Union financial contribution;
Amendment 37 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Decision (EU) 2017/1324
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. PRIMA shall support a wide range of research and innovation activities, addressing a wide range of Technology Readiness Levels and ensuring an appropriate balance between small and large projects, including capacity building and training in South Mediterranean Participating States (SM PS), as described in its annual work programme, by means of:
Amendment 38 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Decision (EU) 2017/1324
Article 6 – paragraph 10 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 10 – point b
(b) the proposals shall be selected following transnational calls for proposals and shall be evaluated by at least three independent experts, on the basis of the following award criteria: excellence, impact, andfulfilment of sustainability criteria, quality and efficiency of the implementation;
Amendment 42 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Decision (EU) 2017/1324
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The activities of PRIMA, efficiency and transparency of PRIMA as well as evaluation of the success rates shall be continuously monitored and subject to periodic reviews to ensure the highest impact, scientific excellence and the most effective and efficient use of resources. The outcome of the monitoring and of the periodic reviews shall feed into the monitoring of European partnerships as part of the Horizon Europe evaluations, pursuant to Articles 50 and 52 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695.
Amendment 44 #
2023/0207(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Decision (EU) 2017/1324
Article 14 – paragraph 4
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. The interim and final evaluations referred to in paragraph 3 shall examine the success rates and the absorption rates of the SM PS as well as how PRIMA fulfils its mission and objectives, cover all its activities and evaluate its European added value, effectiveness, efficiency, including its openness and transparency, the relevance of the activities pursued, including in NGOs, civil society, industry and by SMEs, and their consistency and complementarity with relevant regional, national and Union policies, including synergies with other parts of Horizon Europe, such as other partnerships, missions, clusters and thematic or specific programmes. The evaluations shall take into account the views of all relevant stakeholders, at both Union and national level. They shall include, where relevant, an assessment of the most effective policy intervention mode for any future action, as well as the relevance and coherence of any possible renewal of PRIMA, given the overall policy priorities and the research and innovation support landscape, including the positioning against other initiatives supported through Horizon Europe. When carrying out those evaluations, the Commission shall fully consider the administrative impact on PRIMA and shall seek to reduce the administrative burden and to ensure that the evaluation process is kept simple and fully transparent. Interim and final evaluation shall also examine the possibility of adding new climate-related R&I topics.
Amendment 68 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) For some raw materials, the Union is almost fully dependent on a single country for its supply. Such dependencies entail a high risk of supply disruptions. To limit such potential riskLikewise, a large number of strategic raw materials are sourced from countries in which mining is linked to serious human rights abuses, the deterioration of governance, conflicts, and environmental destruction. To limit such adverse effects and increase the Union’s economic resilience, efforts should be undertaken to ensure that, by 2030, it is not dependent on a single third country for more than 65% of its supply of any strategic raw material, unprocessed and at any stage of processing, giving however special consideration to countries with whom the Union has established a Strategic Partnership on raw materials giving rise to greater assurances regarding supply riskand has implemented autonomous and collaborative measures to mitigate the risk of human rights abuses and environmental destruction in the raw material supply chain, including via the use of Strategic Partnerships.
Amendment 71 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) In order to diversify the Union's supply of strategic raw materials, the Commission should, with the support of the Board, identify Strategic Projects in third countries that intend to become active in the extraction, processing or recycling of strategic raw materials. To ensure that such Strategic Projects are effectively implemented, they should benefit from improved access to finance. In order to ensure their added value, projects should be assessed against a set of criteria, taking into account that in the past for a majority of resource-rich developing countries, mining, oil or gas exploitation has not translated into broader-based economic, human and social development. Like projects in the Union, all Strategic Projects in third countries should strengthen the Union's security of supply for strategic raw materials, show sufficient technical feasibility and be implemented sustainably. For projects in emerging markets and developing economies, the project should be mutually beneficial for the Union and the third country involved and add value in that country, taking into account also its consistency with the Union’s common commercial policy, in compliance with due diligence processes as defined by EU legislation and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct and Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, addressing adverse impacts on human rights and environmental, rule of law and good governance, as well as the FAO Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests, where land tenure rights are concerned . For projects in emerging markets and developing economies, the project should be mutually beneficial for the Union and the third country involved and add value in that country, taking into account that for mineral-rich developing countries, realising the full potential of the mining sector as a catalyst for sustainable development is fraught with many challenges, which includes i.a.: the finite nature of mineral deposits; the “enclave” nature of the extractive industry, with few links to the local economy; the volatility in commodity prices; limited national capacities, which leaves ill-equipped national administrations vulnerable to large multinational companies; corruption and conflicting stakeholders interests. Such value may be derived from the project’s contribution to more than one stage of the whole value chain, including raw material processing, as well as from creating through the project wider economic and social benefits, including the creation of employment in compliance with international standards, notably the core labour standards of the International Labour Organisation, as well as the right to the free, prior, and informed consent of Indigenous peoples and local communities, in line with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and ILO Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples. Where the Commission assesses these criteria to be fulfilled, it should publish the recognition as a Strategic Project in a decision.
Amendment 74 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The definition of mutually beneficial partnership with third countries entails, in particular for low-income resource-rich countries, to breaking away from the enclave nature and extractivist model of the mining sector and to afford developing countries sufficient policy space facilitate knowledge and technology, local value addition by facilitating the manufacturing of finished and semi-finished goods in relevant downstream industries, economic and social development in partner countries, as well as the uptake of environmentally sustainable and circular economy practices and decent working conditions.
Amendment 79 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Any promoter of a strategic raw materials project should be able to apply to the Commission for the recognition of their project as a Strategic Project. The application should include several documents and evidence related to the criteria. To better assess the social, environmental and economic viability, the feasibility of the project as well as the level of confidence in the estimates, the project promoter should also provide a classification of the project according to the United Nations Framework Classification for Resources, and to allow for objective validation, they should support this classification with relevant evidence. A timetable for the project should also be attached to an application, in order to estimate when the project would be able to contribute towards the benchmarks for domestic capacity or for diversification. As public acceptance of mining projects is crucial for their effective implementation, the promoter should also provide a plan containing measures to facilitate public accepensure public participation. This is also valid for projects in third countries, where the respect of the Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of local communities and indigenous people is of primary importance. . Special attention should be paid to social partners, civil society and other oversight actors. The promoter should also provide a business plan providing information regarding the project’s financial viability and giving an overview of funding and off- take agreements already secured as well as estimates for potential job creation and for the project’s needs in terms of skilled workforce, including upskilling and reskilling.
Amendment 82 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) As the cooperation of the Member State on whose territory a Strategic Project will be implemented is necessary to ensure its effective implementation, that Member State should have the right to object to and thereby prevent that a project is granted the status of Strategic Project against its will. If it does so, the relevant Member State should provide a reasoned justification for its refusal referring to the applicable criteria. Similarly, the Union should not grant the status of Strategic Project to projects that will be implemented by a third country against the will of its government and should therefore refrain from doing so where a third country government objects, taking into account that environmental and social impacts are the main factors leading to a lack of public acceptance in the extractive sector.
Amendment 86 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Land use conflicts can create barriers toarise from the deployment of critical raw material projects, notably in developing countries, where forced eviction or relocation are common features of mining operations. This is a serious human rights violation, especially for indigenous people whose livelihoods are closely intertwined with the land and who derive much of their livelihoods from biodiversity services. Well-designed plans, including spatial plans and zoning, that take into account the potential for implementing critical raw material projects and whose potential environmental impacts are assessed, have the potential to help balance public goods and interests, decreasing the risk of conflict and accelerating the sustainable deployment of raw materials projects in the Union. Responsible national, regional and local authorities should therefore consider including provisions for raw materials projects when developing relevant plans.
Amendment 88 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) In order to overcome the limitations of the currently often fragmented public and private investments efforts, facilitate integration and return on investment, the Commission, Member States and promotional banks should better coordinate and create synergies between the existing funding programmes at Union and national level as well as ensure better coordination and collaboration with industry and key private sector stakeholders. To that end, a dedicated sub-group of the Board bringing together experts from the Member States and the Commission as well as relevant public financial institutions should be set up. This sub-group should discuss the individual financing needs of Strategic Projects and their existing funding possibilities in order to provide project promoters with a suggestion on how to best access existing financing possibilities. When discussing and making recommendations for the financing of Strategic Projects in third countries, the Board should in particular take into account the Global Gateway strategy42 . Also the Board shall ensure that the financing of Strategic Projects in third countries comply with the objectives and general principles set in NDICI - Global Europe regulation and the international guidelines and Conventions on investiment, including the UN Principles for Responsible Investment, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, ILO conventions, international human rights law and the development effectiveness principles. _________________ 42 Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank The Global Gateway (JOIN/2021/30 final).
Amendment 101 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 53 a (new)
Recital 53 a (new)
(53a) The Agenda 2030 has given a new impetus to deliver improved livelihoods from extractive resources, provided that careful consideration is paid to the views and expectations of all the key actors in home and host countries, to reconcile issues of sustainable development and security of supply, such as the Africa Mining Vision and the EU Raw Materials Initiative. At the local level, inclusive business models should be implemented in which local communities participate in decision-making, their rights are protected and they benefit from extractive industries.
Amendment 102 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
Recital 54
(54) The Union has concluded Strategic Partnerships covering raw materials with third countries in order to implement the 2020 Action Plan on Critical Raw Materials. In order to diversify supply, these efforts should continue. Nevertheless, the Union shall fully take into account that extractive activities in developing countries often operate in complex social environments surrounded by vulnerable communities, where the role of human rights defenders, among others, is very crucial. To develop and ensure a coherent framework for the conclusion of future partnerships, the Member States and the Commission should, as part of their interaction on the Board, and with full involvement of the European Parliament, discuss and ensure coordination on, inter alia, whether existing partnerships achieve the intended aims, the prioritisation of third countries for new partnerships, the content of such partnerships and their coherence and potential synergies between Member States' bilateral cooperation with relevant third countries. The Union should seek mutually beneficial partnerships with emerging market and developing economies, in coherence with its Global Gateway strategy, which contribute to the diversification of its raw materials supply chain as well as add value in the production in these countries. Strategic partnerships should include commitments from the Union to offer technical assistance to tackle illicit financial flows, improve regulation of the activities of trans-national corporations and financial regulation, as well technical assistance to governements and private actors to support compliance with Union legislation on supply chain due diligence.
Amendment 106 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 55
Recital 55
(55) In order to support the implementation of tasks pertaining to the development of Strategic Projects and their financing, exploration programmes, monitoring capacities or strategic stocks and to advise the Commission appropriately, a European Critical Raw Materials Board should be established. The Board should be composed of Member States and of the Commission, while being able to ensure participation of other parties as observers, such as academics, think tanks, CSOs and EU agencies. To develop the necessary expertise for the implementation of certain tasks, the Board should establish standing sub-groups on financing, exploration, monitoring and strategic stocks, that should act as a network by gathering the different relevant national authorities and, when necessary, consult industry, academia, civil society and other relevant stakeholders. The Board’s advice and opinions should be non-binding and the absence of such an advice or opinion should not prevent the Commission from performing its tasks under this Regulation.
Amendment 108 #
2023/0079(COD)
1. The general objective of this Regulation is to improve the functioning of the internal market by establishing a framework to ensure the Union's access to a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materialsimprove the resilience of the Union regarding the supply of critical raw materials, by prioritising sustainability, efficiency and circularity, with the view to reduce global demand for virgin materials to achieve Sustainable Development Goals, notably to address the challenges of climate change, water stress and pollution and loss of biodiversity.
Amendment 129 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 62
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 62
(62) ‘Strategic Partnership’ means a commitment between the Union and a third country to increase cooperation related to the raw materials value chain that is established through a non-binding instrument setting out concrete actions of mutual interes, setting out concrete measures of mutual interest in areas such as environmental and human rights protection, technology and knowledge transfer, research and development, value distribution, working conditions and national socio-economic development.
Amendment 144 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) for projects in third countries that are emerging markets or developing economies, the project would be mutually beneficial for the Union and the third country concerned by adding value in that countryrespecting international standards and conventions and the highest environmental and human rights standards in that country and by adding local value, notably through inclusive business models in which local communities participate in decision-making, their rights are protected and they benefit from extractive activities.
Amendment 178 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point c
(c) factors that might affect supply, including but not limited to the geopolitical situation, logistics, energy supply, workforce or natural disasters, as well as the risk of human rights violations and lack of compliance with international sustainability standards and, when applicable, Union legislation;
Amendment 200 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 33 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Strategic Partnerships concluded by the Union with third countries shall contain concrete measures contributing towards: (i) improving the resilience and sustainability of the Union's supply of critical raw materials listed in Annex II; (ii) the benchmark set out in Article 1, paragraph 2, point (b); (iii) improving cooperation and shared responsibility along the critical raw materials value chain between the Union and partner countries in achieving the agreed partnership objectives, while respecting the policy space of the EU and of the partner countries; (iv) the economic and social development in partner countries, in particular for emerging and developing economies, through a governance framework that prioritises human rights, while also promoting the uptake of environmentally sustainable and circular economy practices and decent working conditions; (v) the increase of local value addition by facilitating the manufacturing of finished and semi-finished goods in relevant downstream industries, including via the facilitation or support of private and public investment; (ix) The transfer of knowledge and technology as well as transfer of patents where this would be determinant for moving up the value chain for the partner country (vi) the recognition of the rights of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPCI) of Indigenous People and Local Communities; (vii) the full transparency of the mining sector in relation to revenues and contracts, in line with Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) requirements, including regarding environmental transparency; (viii) implementation of the United Nations Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP) and the Protect, Respect and Remedy framework.
Amendment 203 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part
(a) the extent to which Strategic Partnerships concluded by the Union contribute towards the objectives laid down in paragraph 1:
Amendment 204 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Amendment 206 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Amendment 207 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
Amendment 214 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i a (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i a (new)
(ia) whether strategic environmental impact assessments and integrated spatial planning are implemented;
Amendment 215 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i b (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i b (new)
(ib) whether the principle of prevention and precautionary principle is respected;
Amendment 216 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) whether a third country's regulatory framework expresses interest in ensuring that its regulatory framework or its effective implementation ensures the monitoring, prevention and, minimisation ofand compensation of adverse social and environmental impacts of mining, the use of socially responsible practices including respect of human and labour rights and meaningful engagement with local communitiesand active participation in strategic projects decision-making by of affected local communities, in particular indigenous people, the use of transparent and responsible business practices, in line with the UN Principles on Business and Human Rights, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Entreprises and Due Diligence Guidelines for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from conflict- affected and high-risk areas the Convention on Biodiversity and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, and the prevention of adverse impacts on the proper functioning of public administration and the rule of law;
Amendment 220 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii a (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii a (new)
(iiia) whether civil society participation processes are in place in the partner country to enable participation of the public in the implementation of the partnership;
Amendment 221 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii b (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii b (new)
(iiib) contributing to the economic and social developments in partner countries, in particular for emerging and developing economies, through a governance framework that prioritises human rights, while also promoting the uptake of environmentally sustainable and circular economy practices and decent working conditions;
Amendment 224 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2
Article 33 – paragraph 2
2. The Board shall, in the context of paragraph 1 and 2 and in so far as relates to emerging market and developing economies, ensure cooperation and policy coherence for sustainable development, as enshrined in the UN 2030 Agenda, with other relevant coordination fora, including those established as part of the Global Gateway strategy. and the Union´s common commercial policy, including its investment components, and its Trade and Sustainable Development approach;
Amendment 237 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Article 35 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Where appropriate, the Board may invite experts, academics, think tanks, CSOs and other third parties or representatives of third countries to attend meetings of the standing or temporary sub- groups referred to in paragraph 6 as observers or to provide written contributions.
Amendment 257 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point i a (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point i a (new)
(ia) The principles of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) as established in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2007;
Amendment 259 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point i b (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point i b (new)
(ib) The International Bill of Human Rights, including the international covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;
Amendment 261 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point i c (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point i c (new)
(ic) ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work;
Amendment 263 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point i d (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point i d (new)
(id) Eight fundamental ILO Conventions as defined under the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at work;
Amendment 265 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point i e (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point i e (new)
(ie) Ten Principles of the United Nations Global Compact;
Amendment 266 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point i f (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point i f (new)
(if) UN Paris Agreement;
Amendment 267 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point i g (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point i g (new)
(ig) ILO Convention 169 related to Indigenous and Tribal Peoples;
Amendment 270 #
2023/0079(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 a (new)
Annex III – point 4 a (new)
Amendment 20 #
2022/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
– Having regard to its previous resolutions, in particular those of 15 April 2015 on the centenary of the Armenian Genocide,
Amendment 108 #
2022/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of the results of the recent presidential and parliamentary elections in Türkiye and considers them a sign foreboding political continuity in the country; notes with appreciation the presence of the Prime Minister of Armenia at the inauguration of the newly- elected President of Turkey; considers this as a highly important development which can have a positive impact on prosperity and security in the region; acknowledges the peaceful manner in which the Turkish people conducted this process and applauds the high turnout; regrets, however, that, as reflected by the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission, the elections did not take place on a level playing field and were impacted, among other things, by essential freedoms being heavily hindered by the current legal framework and practice, and by the unjustified advantage enjoyed by the ruling parties;
Amendment 117 #
2022/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates its profound sadness about the deadly, devastating earthquakes that shook south-eastern Türkiye and Syria on 6 February 2023 and its heartfelt condolences to the victims’ families; welcomes the international relief and recovery effort, including by the EU and its Member States; commends the humanitarian aid and rescue team provided by Armenia during the devastating earthquake as well as the historic visit of the Armenian Foreign Minister to Ankara.
Amendment 275 #
2022/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 – point 1 (new)
Paragraph 13 – point 1 (new)
(1) Welcomes the ongoing process of normalization of relations between Armenia and Turkey without any preconditions, encourages Turkey to pave the way for genuine reconciliation between the Turkish and Armenian peoples, including settling the dispute of the Armenian Genocide, fully respecting its obligations to protect Armenian and other cultural heritage, and to fulfill the agreements reached during the bilateral talks such as opening the airspace and the border between two countries; encourages Turkey, once again, to recognize the Armenian Genocide;
Amendment 116 #
2022/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – point c a (new)
Paragraph 12 – point c a (new)
(c a) ensuring that every decision throughout the whole procedure is aligned with the Paris Agreement, the Green Deal’s objectives and the principle of “do no significant harm";
Amendment 117 #
2022/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – point c b (new)
Paragraph 12 – point c b (new)
(c b) improving the gender balance and the geographical balance across the Union’s regions of EIC beneficiaries;
Amendment 118 #
2022/2063(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – point c c (new)
Paragraph 12 – point c c (new)
(c c) ensuring an efficient collaboration with National Contact Points as well as regional authorities if applicable;
Amendment 37 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The European Cross-Border cooperation between public administrations in NUTS III regions from at least two different Member States lying directly on the borders or adjacent to them can tackle common challenges identified jointly in the border regions and ensure interoperability and seamless cross-border data flows, while enhancing the cooperation process for the purposes of the citizens and bussinesses access to tools that facilitate democratic processes and growth.
Amendment 45 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) It is in the interest of a coherent approach to public sector interoperability throughout the Union, of supporting the principle of good administration and the free movement of personal and non- personal data within the Union, to align the rules as far as possible for all public sectors that are controllers or providers of network and information systems used to facilitate or manage public services. In the establishment, improvement or operation of common solutions all initiatives should, where appropriate, build on or be accompanied by the sharing of experience and solutions and the exchange and promotion of good practices, technological neutrality and adaptability, while principles of security, privacy and protection of personal data should always be applied. This objective includes the Commission and other institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union, as well as public sector bodies in the Member States across all levels of administration: national, regional and local. Agencies are playing an important role in collecting regulatory reporting data from Member States. Therefore, the interoperability of this data - should also be in scope of this Regulation.
Amendment 51 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Cross-border interoperability is not solely enabled via centralised Member State digital infrastructures, but also through a decentralised approach. This entails data exchange between local administrations in different Member States without necessarily going through national nodes. Therefore, it is necessary to develop common solutions across all administrative levels, particularly for specifications and applications. Needs for cross-border digital interactions are increasing, which requires solutions that can fulfil these needs. With this Regulation, the intention is to facilitate and encourage the exchange between all levels of administration and has a great potential for avoidance of cross-border electronic barriers, further securing the emergence of non-existing or the consolidation of still immature common public services at the European level.
Amendment 58 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Interoperability facilitates successful implementation of policies, in particular those with a strong public sector connection, such as justice and home affairs, taxation and customs, transport, health, agriculture, as well as in business and industry regulation. However, a single sector interoperability perspective is associated with the risk that the adoption of different or incompatible solutions at national or sectoral levels will give rise to new electronic barriers that impede the proper functioning of the internal market and the associated freedoms of movement. Furthermore, it risks undermining the openness and competitiveness of markets and the delivery of services of general interest to businesses and citizens. Therefore, this Regulation should also facilitate, encourage and apply to cross- sector interoperability, removing electronic barriers, public service incompatibilities and fragmentation.
Amendment 62 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to eliminate fragmentation in the interoperability landscape in the Union, a common understanding of interoperability in the Union and a holistic approach to interoperability solutions should be promoted. A structured cooperation should support measures promoting digital-ready and interoperable by default policy set-up. Furthermore, it should promote the efficient management and use of digital service infrastructures and their respective components by public sector bodies and institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union that permit the establishment and operation of sustainable and efficient cross-border public services with the aim of ensuring accesibility up to the lowest administrative divison.
Amendment 65 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) One of the barriers for interoperability, reuse of solutions and establishment of cross border services is the language barrier, therefore standardisation of logical structures is a key aspect in the creation of interoperable systems. To that regard special care must be given to multilingualism in the public service sector and linguistic diversity, aiming to facilitate the use and preservation of regional languages and dialects.
Amendment 70 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Public sector bodies or institutions, bodies or agencies of the Union that search for interoperability solutions should be able to request from other public sector bodies or institutions, bodies or agencies of the Union the software code those organisations use, together with the related documentation. Sharing should become a default among public sector bodies, and institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union while not sharing would need a legal justification. In addition, public sector bodies or institutions, bodies, or agencies of the Union should seek to develop new interoperability solutions or to further develop existing interoperability solution, incentivising the public procurement of free and open source solutions.
Amendment 73 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The next versions of the EIF should be developed by the Interoperability Europe Board, composed, among others, by one representative of each Member State. The Member States, with the other members of the Interoperable Europe Board, are thus at the centre of the development and implementation of the EIF. The Interoperable Europe Board should update the EIF when necessary.
Amendment 74 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) An Interoperable Europe portal should be built on existing initiatives and established as a point of reference for interoperability solutions, knowledge and community. The portal should be established as a link to official sources but should also be open to input from the Interoperable Europe Community.
Amendment 78 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) It is necessary to establish a governance mechanism to facilitate the implementation of Union policies in a way that ensures interoperability. This mechanism should focus on the interoperable digital implementation of policies once they have been adopted in the form of legal acts and should serve to develop interoperability solutions on a needs-driven basis. The mechanism should support public sector bodies. Projects to support public sector bodies should be proposed by the Interoperable Europe Board to the Commission who should decide whether to set up the projects, with due regard to the need to encourage the development and deployment of free and open source solutions at all levels, including the local and regional ones.
Amendment 81 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
Amendment 82 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
Amendment 86 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) The Interoperable Europe Community should be facilitated open to all interested parties. Access to the Interoperable Europe Community should be facilitated and made as easy as possible, avoiding unnecessary barriers and burdens. The Interoperable Europe Community should bring together public and private stakeholders, including citizens, with expertise in the field of cross-border interoperability, coming from different backgrounds, such as academia, research and innovation, education, standardisation and specifications, businesses and public administration at all levels. As resources are scarce in the civil society field, and their participation in the policy and decision making process is essential, the Comission should establish special support mechanisms for participation.
Amendment 89 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) An Interoperable Europe Agenda should be established as the Union’s main instrument for the coordination of public investments in interoperability solutions. It should deliver a comprehensive overview of funding possibilities and funding commitments in the field, integrating where appropriate the related Union programmes. This should contribute to creating synergies and coordinating financial support related to interoperability development and avoiding duplication. The Interoperable Europe Agenda should also include clear objectives and key performance indicators on the use of Free and Open Source software among public administrations, in order to enhance a proper measurement of progress and achievement of those objectives
Amendment 95 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
Amendment 105 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The interoperability assessment shall be carried out before taking decisions on the legal, organisational, semantic or technical requirements for the new or modified network and information system in a binding manner. A single interoperability assessment may be carried out to address a set of requirements and several network and information systems, if the level of detail is appropriate.
Amendment 107 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The public sector body or the institution, body or agency of the Union concerned shall publish a report presenting the outcome of the interoperability assessment on its website in a machine readable format, facilitating automated translation.
Amendment 111 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
Amendment 112 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b b (new)
(bb) a list of the potential re-usable solutions created, or of the use of such existing solutions;
Amendment 113 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b c (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – point b c (new)
(bc) the technical documentation, version history and, where applicable, the documented source code of the intended network and information system;
Amendment 115 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 5
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. The public sector body, or institution, body or agency of the Union concerned shall consult recipients of the services affected or their representatives on the intended operation if it directly affects the recipients. This consultation is without prejudice to the protection of commercial or public interests or the security of such systems.
Amendment 119 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) a list of the potential re-usable solutions created, or of the use of such existing solutions;
Amendment 120 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
Amendment 123 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. In order to support the creation of reusable solutions, the public sector body or an institution, body or agency of the Union shall prioritise public procuremtnt of free and open source software solutions, or other solutions that do not carry restrictive licensing terms and allow sharing and reuse. The European Comission shall provide support in identifying, developing and deploying such solutions, as provided for in article 9.
Amendment 125 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall publish Interoperable Europe solutions and the European Interoperability Framework on the Interoperable Europe portal , by electronic means, in formats that are open, machine-readable, accessible42, findable and re-usable, if applicable, together with their metadatadocumented source code andmetadata . Multilingualism should be the rule, with due care being given to regional public administrations and users, supporting regional and minority languages. _________________ 42 Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 70–115).
Amendment 126 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Measurable indicators to monitor the implementation and to report on the progress of the implementation and steps towards the achievement of the objectives shall be established by the board. To that regards the Board shall establish a methodology to provide for indicators that ensure an accurate reflection of actions and activities up to local and NUTS III level.
Amendment 129 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. Where a Member States shall develops a national interoperability framework ands or other relevant national policies, strategies or guidelines, it shall take intotaking outmost account of the EIF.
Amendment 130 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
(1) The Interoperable Europe Board shall recommend interoperability solutions for the cross-border interoperability of network and information systems which are used to provide or manage public services to be delivered or managed electronically in the Union. (2) When an interoperability solution is recommended by the Interoperable Europe Board, it shall carry the label ‘Interoperable Europe solution’ and shall be published on the Interoperable Europe portal. (3) In order to qualify the label ‘Interoperable Europe solution’ and be published on the Interoperable Europe portal, a solution shall: (a) be available for re-use with appropriate code transparency licenses; (b) be based on European open standards; (c) be in use in at least one Member State or European institution; (d) comply with the guidelines set by Interoperable Europe Board.
Amendment 135 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Amendment 138 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) involve CivicTech andGovTech actors.
Amendment 139 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Amendment 141 #
Amendment 148 #
Amendment 153 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, assisted by the Interoperable Europe Board, shall provide training material on the use of the EIF and on Interoperable Europe solutions such as Free and Open Source solutions. Public sector bodies and institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union shall provide their staff entrusted with strategical or operational tasks having an impact on network and information systems in the Union with appropriate training programmes concerning interoperability issues.
Amendment 159 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i a (new)
(ia) the European Parliament
Amendment 164 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Board shall be chaired by the Commission. Countries participating in the European Economic Area and, candidate countries and regional administrations and representatives of the Free and Open Source community may be invited as observers. In addition, the Chair may give the status of observer to individuals and organisations after consultation with the Interoperable Europe Board. The Chair may invite to participate, on an ad hoc basis, experts with specific competence in a subject on the agenda. The Commission shall provide the secretariat of the Interoperable Europe Board.
Amendment 170 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point d
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) establish indicators up to local and regional level and monitor the overall coherence of the developed or recommended interoperability solutions;
Amendment 171 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point h
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point h
(h) approve guidelines for awarding the and Interoperable Europe label and recommend Interoperable Europe solutions;
Amendment 173 #
2022/0379(COD)
(k) review reports from innovation measures, on the use of the regulatory sandbox and on the peer reviews and propose follow-up measures, if necessary;
Amendment 174 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point l a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point l a (new)
(la) propose measures to support the public administrations in development and deployment of interoperability solutions, including direct support for developers of free and open source software that meets the EIF requirements;
Amendment 177 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point r a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point r a (new)
Amendment 178 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point r b (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – point r b (new)
(rb) provide guidance and support to Member States in establishing a common and harmonised European cross-border procurement for Free and Open Source interoperable solutions.
Amendment 179 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Public and private stakeholders residing or having their registered office in a Member State may register on the Interoperable Europe portal as a member of the Interoperable Europe Community. Registration and membership shall be free of charges and fees. In order to promote participation, the Commision shall establish support programs for individuals, civil society, academia, small bussinesses and local administrations.
Amendment 183 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
(ca) attend the Interoperable Europe Board meetings and activities as observers
Amendment 189 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) clear objectives and key performance indicators on the use of Free and Open Source software among public administrations in order to enhance a proper measurement of progress and achievement of those objectives.
Amendment 191 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
(db) the identification of the available budget dedicated to assisting the performance of the priorities included in the Agenda.
Amendment 193 #
2022/0379(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission and the Boad shall monitor the progress of the development of cross- border interoperable public services to be delivered or managed electronically in the Union. The monitoring shall give priority to themake use of the indicators set by the Board and reuse of existing international, Union and national monitoring data and to automated data collection in order to achive a detailed representation of interoperability progress up to local and regional level.
Amendment 1 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
— having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 22 June 2022 on the power of trade partnerships: together for green and just economic growth,
Amendment 2 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
— having regard to its resolution of 6 October 2016 on Thailand, notably the situation of Andy Hall,
Amendment 3 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
— having regard to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol,
Amendment 4 #
Amendment 5 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 c (new)
Citation 11 c (new)
— having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) of 1966 to which Thailand is a state party,
Amendment 6 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 d (new)
Citation 11 d (new)
Amendment 7 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 e (new)
Citation 11 e (new)
— having regard to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance,
Amendment 8 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 f (new)
Citation 11 f (new)
— having regard to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment,
Amendment 9 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 g (new)
Citation 11 g (new)
— having regard to the Convention on the Rights of the Child,
Amendment 10 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 h (new)
Citation 11 h (new)
— having regard to the Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court,
Amendment 11 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
— having regard to the letter from the Committee on Fisheries,
Amendment 13 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the EU and Thailand completed negotiations on a PCA in March 2013, but the military coup in Thailand in 2014 halted the process; whereas elections for a civilian government were constantly delayed by the military junta until 2019; whereas the current 2017 constitution was approved in a military-dominated referendum and moved the country away from an elective legislative;
Amendment 15 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas throughout 2020-2021, following flawed elections in 2019 and the dissolution of major political parties, Thailand saw mass street protests, in particular of young people and students, demanding a new democratic institution, a reform of the monarchy and the resignation of the former army chief and current Prime Minister, who has been ruling the country since the 2014 coup; whereas these mostly youth-led protests were met with violent force by the police and protesters, including children, were prosecuted for political reasons; whereas recent constitutional court rulings added further conditions and procedural roadblocks to amend the constitution;
Amendment 16 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas Thailand was among the first countries to sign the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but its overall human rights record remains highly problematic;
Amendment 20 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
L a. whereas Thailand's draconian lèse-majesté laws, including the outrageously disproportionate punishments, continue to be used to stifle dissent and persecute human rights defenders, democracy defenders, civil society activists, journalists and others;
Amendment 21 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas the death penalty continues to be applied in Thailand, even though the country’s fourth National Human Rights Plan (2019-2023) contains a commitment to moving towards the abolition of capital punishment; whereas Thailand is not a signatory to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty;
Amendment 23 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
N. whereas Thailand is not a signatory to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention; whereas there are well-documented reports of people fleeing Myanmar being forcibly deported back to Myanmar, in an apparent violation of the right to asylum and the principle of non-refoulement;
Amendment 27 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N a (new)
Recital N a (new)
Na. whereas Thailand has not yet ratified fundamental ILO conventions, notably the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention;
Amendment 32 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that the EU is committed to a free, open and rules-based Indo-Pacific region; reiterates that the EU’s new Indo-Pacific Strategy needs to be implemented swiftly, as it offers our partners in the region an opportunity to address the common challenges together, to defend the rules-based international order and to stand up for the values and principles we share; advocates for stronger cooperation with countries in the region, including in particular with ASEAN countries;
Amendment 33 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the political value of strong trade and investment relations based on sustainability, due diligence and fair competition in full respect for high labour and environmental standards between ASEAN and the EU in general, and between Thailand and the EU in particular; welcomes the recent EU- ASEAN summit and the commitment to further deepening this strategic partnership;
Amendment 35 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates its call for a swift implementation of the EU Global Gateway strategy in coordination with the Indo- Pacific strategy; welcomes the announcement of a EUR 10 billion package to accelerate infrastructure investments in ASEAN countries, in particular with regard to the green transition and sustainable connectivity; , while emphasizing the geopolitical centrality of this strategy which integrates sustainable development- oriented, transformational, resilience- enhancing and values-based dimensions in a Team Europe approach; welcomes the announcement of a EUR 10 billion package to accelerate infrastructure investments in ASEAN countries, in particular with regard to the green transition and sustainable connectivity; calls for an effective governance of Global Gateway, which has to be taken forward under the overall steer of the President of the Commission; demands to be duly involved in the decisions on the Global Gateway investment programmes, and to be regularly informed about the respective developments, including budgetary implications;
Amendment 37 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the support of partners in the Indo-Pacific region has been and remains very valuable with regard to voting in the UN General Assembly relating to Russia’s unjustified, unprovoked and illegal war on Ukraine; welcomes the fact that Thailand voted to condemn Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and appreciates the humanitarian aid provided by Thailand to Ukraine; encourages Thailand to follow up on this commitment also within the framework of ASEAN, promoting the respect for international law, support for Ukraine and taking a clear stance against the Russian war of aggression;
Amendment 44 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the parties’ common objective of strengthening the global response to climate change and its impact and enhancing cooperation on policies to help mitigate climate change in accordance with the Paris Agreement; highlights the commitments under Article 38 that each Party shall effectively implement the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 45 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Amendment 46 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Emphasises the parties’ endeavour to enhance cooperation in the energy sector, including on access to affordable and sustainable energy services, developing sustainable and renewable forms of energy and promoting low-carbon power generation that contributes to a clean energy transition; encourages both parties to step up efforts to tackle the effects of climate change by adopting and implementing more effective climate policies towards energy transition and decarbonisation;
Amendment 47 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Highlights that Thailand faces increasing environmental degradation in many regions, including the loss of biodiversity and declining wildlife populations, deforestation, desertification, water scarcity, and air and water pollution; urges both partners to focus in their cooperation on the fight against these problems, fully in line with Article 43 of the agreement; highlights against this background, that it is crucial to significantly strengthen current procedures for comprehensive impact assessments in the context of large development projects, including public consultations with the concerned local communities and independent experts; acknowledges and commends the crucial role played by environmental rights defenders in protecting the environment and fighting abuses;
Amendment 48 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls in this context on the Thai authorities and the EU to involve civil society, trade unions and human rights defenders in transparent discussions on the FTA in a meaningful way from an early stage onwards;
Amendment 49 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Reaffirms the parties’ commitment to cooperating underStresses that Article 1(1) of the PCA on promoting and protectingvides that human rights and strengtheningthe respect of democratic principles, the rule of law and good governance constitute essential elements of the PCA;
Amendment 51 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Amendment 53 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Urges the Thai authorities to repeal its lèse-majesté provisions under Article 112 of the Criminal Code, which are among the strictest in the world and are not in line with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that Thailand has signed and ratified; urges Thailand to promptly release those individuals who have been politically arrested for criticising the Thai monarchy; is strongly concerned with the unprecedented targeting of children under this lèse-majesté provision and calls on Thailand to abide by its international obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which has been ratified by Thailand;
Amendment 54 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Encourages the Thai argument to engage in a meaningful dialogue with representatives of the protesters, opposition parties and civil society organisations in order to foster cohesion in the country; regrets the chilling effect and the dangerous precedent to the right to freedom of expression that the 10 November 2021 Constitutional Court’s ruling creates by restricting opinions that are critical of the monarchy;
Amendment 55 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 d (new)
Paragraph 13 d (new)
13d. Regrets the Thai government's proposal for a Draft Act on the Operation of Not-for-Profit Organisations of 2021; is concerned about the broad restrictions that this law would impose on NGOs, particularly on those that receive foreign funding, as well as the criminal charges that the representatives of NGOs may face in case of non-compliance with the law; calls on the Thai government to withdraw this law;
Amendment 56 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 e (new)
Paragraph 13 e (new)
13e. Regrets that the 2017 National Human Rights Commission of Thailand (NHRCT) Act stripped this body of its independence; calls on the Thai authorities to amend this law in line with the UN Principles relating to the Status of National Human Rights Institutions (Paris Principles), notably regarding the composition, competence and independence of the NHRCT, with a view to enabling this body to fulfil its duty to serve as an independent bulwark against human rights violations in Thailand;
Amendment 57 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes Thailand’s enactment in 2022Regrets the recent decree by Thailand’s government postponing the enforcement of parts of the Prevention and Suppression of Torture and Enforced Disappearance Act as, a critical milestone in combating torture, ill treatment and enforced disappearances in Thailand and callurges for its full and effective implementation; deeply regrets that none of the forced disappearance cases have been prosecuted or resolved and calls on the Thai authorities to bring the perpetrators of such crimes to justice and to provide adequate reparations for the victims; urges Thailand to swiftly ratify the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance;
Amendment 59 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Reiterates its calls urging Thailand to take concrete steps towards the abolition of the death penalty and to sign and ratify the 1951 Refugee Convention, including signing and ratifying the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty; deplores the latest execution of a prisoner in 2018, the first execution in the country since 2009; stresses the importance of the joint declaration on Article 23 of the PCA to ensure that no death sentences are carried out in the future;
Amendment 63 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Is concerned with the armed conflict between insurgent groups from the south of Thailand and the Thai armed forces, which has caused more than 7.000 deaths since 2004; calls on both sides to engage in peace talks; in this context, encourages the EU to support the mediation of the conflict; urges the Thai authorities to investigate possible war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed by the belligerents and hold the perpetrators accountable;
Amendment 66 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Encourages Thailand to ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in line with Article 5 of the PCA and the joint declaration regarding this article;
Amendment 67 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Reiterates its call on Thailand to sign and ratify the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol;
Amendment 68 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 d (new)
Paragraph 15 d (new)
15d. Underlines that cooperation on migration and any actions in this area need to be implemented in full respect of international law, including international human rights and refugee law; calls on the EU to promote, respect and protect international human rights standards and in particular the principle of non- refoulement and the principle of voluntary return in their cooperation on migration with Thailand;
Amendment 69 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 e (new)
Paragraph 15 e (new)
15e. Against this background, condemns pushbacks by neighbouring countries to Myanmar, which are in contravention of the right to seek asylum and the principle of non-refoulement; calls on all neighbouring countries, including Thailand, to ensure access to asylum/ protection to people fleeing Myanmar; calls on these governments to ensure that aid organisations and local civil society organisations are permitted, able and supported to access areas hosting internally displaced people along their borders with Myanmar;
Amendment 70 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 f (new)
Paragraph 15 f (new)
15f. Regrets the increasing use of informal readmission agreements which circumvent the role foreseen in the Treaties for the Parliament to effectively scrutinise readmission agreements; calls on the Commission and Council to pursue a formal readmission agreement with Thailand in full respect of Parliament's role;
Amendment 71 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 g (new)
Paragraph 15 g (new)
15g. Welcomes Thailand’s legislation towards the advancement of women’s rights including the adoption of the 2015 Gender Equality Act and the inclusion of gender-sensitive budgeting in the 2017 Constitution; calls on the Thai authorities to step up implementation efforts, as well as efforts to combat gender-based violence and to empower women and girls, particularly migrant women, women from rural areas and women belonging to minorities, in line with Article 21 of the PCA;
Amendment 72 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 h (new)
Paragraph 15 h (new)
15h. Encourages the Thai authorities to provide an improved framework for the protection and support of all minority and indigenous groups in the country, with due respect to their fundamental rights, including improving laws governing land rights to protect the economic, social, and cultural rights of indigenous communities;
Amendment 73 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 i (new)
Paragraph 15 i (new)
15i. Notes the increased protection that the 2015 Gender Equality Act provides to the LGBTI community; calls on Thailand to adopt a law on gender recognition and to swiftly recognise same-sex marriages and/or partnerships; regrets the Constitutional Court Ruling No. 20/2564 of 2021 that rejects same-sex marriage, as well as the anti-LGBTQI+ language of this ruling;
Amendment 74 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 j (new)
Paragraph 15 j (new)
15j. Welcomes the adoption of the Second National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (2023-2027) and calls for its effective implementation; welcomes that Thailand is the first country in the Asia-Pacific region to adopt a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 75 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 k (new)
Paragraph 15 k (new)
15k. Regrets the increase in Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs), especially after the coup d’état in 2014, targeting human rights defenders, environmental activists, journalists and other civil society stakeholders; condemns the SLAPPs lodged by private companies and state authorities targeting the communities affected by the environmental impact of mining activities; is concerned with the fact that the majority of the SLAPP cases in Thailand are of criminal nature and are initiated by the public prosecutors; calls on the Thai authorities to adopt and enforce an anti-SLAPPs legal framework in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 76 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls that if either party considers that the other has failed to fulfil any of its obligations under the PCA, notably with regards to its essential elements, it may take appropriate measures, including the suspension of the PCA;
Amendment 77 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to make sureStresses that human rights concerns are duly taken into accountto be considered during any future negotiations on an EU-Thailand FTA; and that outstanding issues must be solved as a precondition to concluding the negotiations; stresses that EU FTAs provide for the so-called “non-execution clause” leading to the suspension of trade preferences in case of violations of PCAs’ essential elements;
Amendment 79 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Recalls that Article 1(2) of the PCA confirms the Parties’ commitment to promoting sustainable development in all its dimensions, to cooperating in addressing challenges of climate change and globalisation, and to contributing to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; expects the Parties to agree to an FTA’s Trade and Sustainable Development Chapter that is fully in line with the new EU’s approach outlined in the Commission Communication “The power of trade partnerships: together for green and just economic growth”, and which is therefore sanctionable under the main dispute settlement mechanism of the FTA;
Amendment 81 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Welcomes the agreement to cooperate and to provide technical assistance with a view to working towards the ratification and implementation of the fundamental ILO Conventions as well as to cooperate on promoting the ratification and implementation of other up-to-date ILO Conventions, including but not limited to the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise and on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining; recalls that ratification and effective implementation of relevant ILO conventions is a key feature of the enforceable commitments under EU’s FTA, specifically TSD chapters, and expects the same level of ambition also in view of an FTA with Thailand;
Amendment 83 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 c (new)
Paragraph 17 c (new)
17c. Acknowledges efforts made by the Government to tackle human rights abuses related to trafficking and forced labour; remains, however, concerned about the labour conditions of migrant workers, including of workers in the fishing sector, as well as about the situation of women migrant workers; in this context, calls on the Thai authorities to take the necessary steps to tackle forced labour and other human rights abuses;
Amendment 84 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 d (new)
Paragraph 17 d (new)
17d. Welcomes the inclusion of provisions on Sustainable Food System underpinning cooperation in such an area, thereby providing a basis for the inclusion of a dedicated chapter in the FTA, and in line with the relevant EU flagship policies, such as the Farm to Fork Strategy; stresses that the agriculture sector has important sensitivities for both Thailand and the EU which should allow for a mutual understanding on a limited liberalisation that is anchored on sustainability principles;
Amendment 85 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 e (new)
Paragraph 17 e (new)
17e. Notes the relevant PCA provisions on investment aimed at enhancing understanding and cooperation on investment issues; takes the view that future investment-related provisions in the FTA should only aim at ensuring non- discrimination of respective investors and provide support to Thailand to continue improving administrative procedures and the general business environment;
Amendment 86 #
2022/0252M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 f (new)
Paragraph 17 f (new)
17f. Notes that Thailand is expected to hold its next elections on 7 May 2023; highlights that holding democratic, fair and free elections and the formation of a stable democratic government that respects, protects and fulfils human rights are important preconditions for successful future EU-Thailand FTA negotiations;
Amendment 1 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
— having regard to the communication from the Commission of 22 June 2022 on the power of trade partnerships: together for green and just economic growth,
Amendment 2 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
— having regard to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights aiming to the abolition of the death penalty,
Amendment 3 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 b (new)
Citation 8 b (new)
— having regard to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and its Optional Protocol,
Amendment 4 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 c (new)
Citation 8 c (new)
— having regard to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) and its Optional Protocol,
Amendment 5 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 d (new)
Citation 8 d (new)
— having regard to the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICERD),
Amendment 6 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 e (new)
Citation 8 e (new)
— having regard to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol,
Amendment 7 #
Amendment 8 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 g (new)
Citation 8 g (new)
— having regard to the Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court,
Amendment 10 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
— having regard to its resolution of 17 December 2015 on Malaysia,
Amendment 11 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 b (new)
Citation 9 b (new)
— having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) of 1966 and its Optional Protocol,
Amendment 12 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas both parties to the EU- Malaysia PCA have reaffirmed their respect for democratic principles and human rights, as laid down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in other relevant international human rights instruments; whereas Malaysia’s human rights record is highly problematic;
Amendment 13 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas following a period of repression and political instability, Malaysia’s November 2022 general elections led to the appointment of long- time opposition leader and former political prisoner Anwar Ibrahim as the country’s prime minister; whereas the new unity government faces steep challenges in pursuing democratic reforms, including in the area of rule of law, upholding human rights and overcoming a deep societal polarisation;
Amendment 17 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
M. whereas Malaysia is not a signatory to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention; whereas about 185 000 refugees and asylum seekers, including over 100 000 ethnic Rohingya Muslims, are registered with the United Nations refugee agency (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) but have not been granted legal status; whereas Malaysia has been deporting refugees back to Myanmar, in an apparent violation of the right to asylum and the principle of non- refoulement;
Amendment 21 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
Amendment 23 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines that the EU is committed to a free, open and rules-based Indo-Pacific region; reiterates that the EU’s new Indo-Pacific Strategy needs to be implemented swiftly, as it offers our partners in the region an opportunity to address the common challenges together, to defend the rules-based international order and to stand up for the values and principles we share; advocates for stronger cooperation with countries in the region, including in particular with ASEAN countries;
Amendment 24 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that ASEAN is a strategic partner for the EU in the Indo- Pacific; welcomes the EU-ASEAN commemorative summit of 14 December 2022; expresses hope that the implementation of the EU-ASEAN joint leaders’ statement will result in stronger cooperation with the Southeast Asian countries and with Malaysia in particular; reiterates the political value of strong trade and investment relations based on sustainability, due diligence and fair competition in full respect for high labour and environmental standards between ASEAN and the EU in general, and between Malaysia and the EU in particular;
Amendment 25 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Reiterates its call for a swift implementation of the EU Global Gateway strategy in coordination with the Indo-Pacific strategy, while emphasizing the geopolitical centrality of this strategy which integrates sustainable development- oriented, transformational, resilience- enhancing and values-based dimensions in a Team Europe approach; welcomes the announcement of a EUR 10 billion package to accelerate infrastructure investments in ASEAN countries, in particular with regard to the green transition and sustainable connectivity; calls for an effective governance of Global Gateway, which has to be taken forward under the overall steer of the President of the Commission; demands to be duly involved in the decisions on the Global Gateway investment programmes, and to be regularly informed about the respective developments, including budgetary implications;
Amendment 26 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that the EU- ASEAN leaders reaffirmed their mutual respect for the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity as espoused in the Charter of the United Nations; reiterates that Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine is a blatant violation of international law; welcomes the fact that Malaysia voted in favour of the UN resolution demanding that Russia immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its military forces from the territory of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders; encourages Malaysia to follow up on this commitment also within the framework of ASEAN, promoting the respect for international law, support for Ukraine and taking a clear stance against the Russian war of aggression;
Amendment 28 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes in general the conclusion of thea PCA with Malaysia; considers that this PCA provides a solid legal framework for further enhancing long-standing bilateral political and economic relations and for discussing issues of regional and global concern such as counter-terrorism, the fight against corruption, the promotion of human rights and of international justice and the strengthening of the international framework for the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; underlines that a modern and future oriented PCA needs to provide an ambitious framework regarding the cooperation to fight climate change, as well as regarding the promotion of gender equality and women’s rights; calls on the EU to put these aspects also in the centre of the EU- Malaysia relations when implementing the PCA;
Amendment 30 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the aim of both parties to strengthen their cooperation on the protection of the environment, including addressing the challenges of climate changeRecalls that Article 1(3) of the PCA confirms the Parties’ commitment to promoting sustainable development, to cooperating to address the challenges of climate change as well as of globalisation, and to contributing to the internationally agreed development goals, in particular to strengthening a global partnership for development as renewed in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; encourages both parties to step up efforts to tackle the effects of climate change by adopting and implementing more effective climate policies towards energy transition and decarbonisation; highlights the commitments made under Article 39 of the PCA that the Parties should enhance cooperation to address climate change mitigation and adaptation issues under the UNFCCC; stresses that as per Article 39, the implementation of the applicable multilateral environmental agreements, including the Paris Agreement, shall be taken into account in all activities undertaken by the Parties under the PCA; regrets that there is not explicit reference to the Paris Agreement included in the PCA;
Amendment 31 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Highlights that Malaysia faces increasing environmental degradation in many regions, including deforestation, the loss of biodiversity, air and water pollution; urges both partners to put an important focus their cooperation on the fight against these problems, fully in line with Article 39 of the agreement; highlights against this background, that it is crucial to significantly strengthen current procedures for comprehensive impact assessments in the context of large development projects, including public consultations with the concerned local communities and in full respect of their fundamental rights, including their land rights; acknowledges and commends the crucial role played by environmental rights defenders in protecting the environment and fighting abuses;
Amendment 35 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Calls on the Malaysian authorities and the EU to involve civil society, trade unions and human rights defenders in a meaningful way in the implementation of this agreement;
Amendment 36 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that the PCA is based on respect for democratic principles and human rightsStresses that Article 1(1) of the PCA provides that human rights and the respect of strengthening democratic principles, the rule of law and good governance constitute essential elements of the PCA; calls for bilateral cooperation to be strengthened in the promotion and protection of human rights, in particular as regards exchanges of best practices, human rights education, the establishment of a meaningful, broad-based human-rights dialogue and cooperation within the relevant UN human rights bodies; commends Malaysia against this background for issuing a standing invitation to the UN Special Procedures on 26 February 2019; encourages Malaysia to invite the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders for a country visit;
Amendment 39 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Reiterates its call on the Malaysian authorities to repeal the Sedition Act and to bring all legislation, including the Communications and Multimedia Act,excessively broad Sedition Act, which has been used by successive governments to stifle dissent and persecute human rights defenders, journalists and others who express critical opinions against the government and the King; reiterates its call on the Malaysian authorities to bring all legislation, including the Prevention of Terrorism Act, the Printing Presses and Publications Act, the Communications and Multimedia Act, the Peaceful Assembly Act, and other relevant provisions of the Criminal Code in line with international standards on freedom of expression and assembly and the protection of human rights; reiterates its calls on the Malaysian authorities to facilitate peaceful assemblies, and to guarantee the safety of all participants and their freedom of expression;
Amendment 42 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Reiterates its concerns about the adoption of the National Security Council Act in 2016, which grants extraordinary powers to the National Security Council and the security forces; reiterates its call on Malaysia to repeal this law, which contravenes international human rights standards; stresses that the need to safeguard national security cannot ignore the obligation to protect civil and political rights;
Amendment 44 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Amendment 48 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Expresses deep concerns about the situation of refugees in Malaysia, in particular as regards the detention and deportation of Rohingya refugees; in this context, calls on Malaysia to grant legal status to the approximately 185,000 refugees and asylum seekers that are registered with the UNHCR; condemns the summary deportation of thousands of Myanmar citizens without assessing their asylum claims or other protection needs in clear violation of the principle of non- refoulement; calls on the Malaysian authorities to swiftly allow the UNHCR to access immigration detention centres; deplores the dire conditions of immigration detention centres, which have caused the death of at least 150 people only in 2022; reiterates its call on Malaysia to sign and ratify the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol;
Amendment 52 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Underlines that cooperation on migration and any actions in this area need to be implemented in full respect of international law, including international human rights and refugee law; calls on the EU to promote, respect and protect international human rights standards and in particular the principle of non- refoulement and the principle of voluntary return in their cooperation on migration with Malaysia;
Amendment 54 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11 b. Regrets the EU’s increasing use of informal readmission agreements which circumvent the role foreseen in the Treaties for the Parliament to effectively scrutinise readmission agreements; calls on the Commission and Council to pursue a formal readmission agreement with Malaysia in full respect of Parliament's role;
Amendment 55 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11 c. Deplores that at least 105 people died in police custody and immigration detention centres only between January 2020 and September 2021; urges the Malaysian government to ensure that cases of torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment against detainees and migrants are properly investigated and its perpetrators are brought to justice; in this context, regrets that none of the perpetrators has been criminally charged for these crimes; reiterates its call on Malaysia to sign and ratify the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and its Optional Protocol;
Amendment 57 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Commends the Malaysian Government’s announcement that it will abolish the country’s mandatory death penalty; encourages Malaysia to take concrete steps to pass the agreement into law;
Amendment 58 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Deeply regrets that the PCA does neither include an Article on Gender Equality nor any provisions referring to the empowerment of women and girls; highlights that gender equality is a core value of the EU and a universally recognised human right; recalls the necessity of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls as a goal in its own right, as well as a driver for democracy, good governance, sustainable and inclusive development, economic growth, prosperity, peace and security; strongly denounces that Malaysian women are not granted equal citizenship rights and that those discriminatory nationality and citizenship laws in Malaysia embody patriarchal values that undermine women’s basic human rights and expose them and their children to harm and further discrimination; calls on the EU to promote gender equality as a key political objective of its external action and common foreign and security policy also in their cooperation and relations with Malaysia, fully in line with the EU's own commitment and priorities;
Amendment 60 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12 b. Is seriously concerned about child marriages, which predominantly affect young women and girls who are more vulnerable to domestic violence, poverty and poor school attendance; encourages the Malaysian authorities to set the marriageable age at 18 years both under civil and Islamic law in line with the recommendations of the Committee on the Rights of the Child;
Amendment 61 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12 c. Condemns the pervasive nature of State-sponsored widespread discrimination against the LGBTIQ+ community, including but not limited to the promotion and funding of conversion therapies, the ban of LGBTIQ+ marches and the prohibition of cross-dressing; in this context, strongly urges the Malaysian authorities to swiftly decriminalise same- sex sexual activities, which are currently punished under colonial-era anti-sodomy laws with up to 20 years of imprisonment and corporal punishment; calls on the Malaysian government to swiftly adopt a legal framework that protects the rights of the LGBTIQ+ community from discrimination, in full respect for fundamental rights and in line with international standards;
Amendment 62 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 d (new)
Paragraph 12 d (new)
12 d. Is concerned about the situation of religious and ethnic minorities and indigenous communities in the country; encourages the Malaysian authorities to provide a comprehensive framework for the protection and support of all minority and indigenous groups in the country, with due respect to their fundamental rights, including religious freedom and cultural rights, as well as promoting tolerance and overcoming polarization and ethnic divide; calls on Malaysian authorities to ratify the 169 ILO Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention;
Amendment 63 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Reiterates its call on the Commission to make sureStresses that human rights concerns are duly taken into accountto be considered during any future negotiations on an EU-Malaysia FTA; and that outstanding issues must be solved as a precondition to concluding the negotiations; stresses that EU FTAs provide for the so-called “non-execution clause” leading to the suspension of trade preferences in case of violations of PCAs’ essential elements;
Amendment 64 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Stresses the commitment to respect, promote and realise the principles of the internationally recognised core labour and social standards, as referred to, in particular, in the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Rights and Principles at Work, and to implement applicable ILO Conventions that are binding on the Parties; welcomes the obligation to cooperate and exchange information on relevant employment and labour matters as agreed by the Parties; against this background, calls on Malaysia to ratify the fundamental ILO Conventions, notably the 1948 Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention and the 1958 Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention;
Amendment 65 #
2022/0221M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Welcomes the recent ratification by Malaysia of the 2014 Protocol to the 1930 Forced Labour Convention and urges for its implementation; is concerned with the reports of forced labour, in particular in the palm oil industry; calls on the Malaysian authorities, the EU as well as EU and Malaysian companies, in order to implement their international responsibility for the respect of human rights, to actively support and use the work of independent civil society actors as a key complement to supply chain monitoring in order to bring to the companies’ and authorities' attention possible problems including suspected cases of labour exploitation, forced labour, human trafficking and irresponsible or unethical recruitment practices; recalls the ongoing legislative work to ban products made with forced labour on the EU market, which will also apply in the context of the EU-Malaysia PCA;
Amendment 31 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to foster energy efficiency of installations within the scope of Directive 2010/75/EU which are carrying out activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC, it is appropriate to submit those installations to energy efficiency requirements in respect of combustion units or other units emitting carbon dioxide on the siter other greenhouse gases on the site. Similarly, emission limits for greenhouse gases should be set, where necessary in order to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest.
Amendment 34 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The contribution of Directive 2010/75/EU to resource and energy efficiency and circular economy in the Union should be made more effective, taking into consideration the ‘Energy Efficiency First’ as a guiding principle of the Union energy policy. Therefore, the permits should establish, where possible, mandatory environmental performance limit values on consumption and resource efficiency levels, including on the use of water, energy and recycled materials, based on the environmental performance levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT AEPLs) set out in decisions on BAT conclusions. Where those environmental performance levels are expressed in a range of values, competent authorities should be required to set in permits the lowest possible emission limit values which reflect the performance of BAT for the specific installations, taking into consideration the whole range of BAT-AELs and aiming at the best environmental performance possible for the installations;
Amendment 44 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Achieving Union objectives regarding a clean, circular and climate neutral economy by 2050 calls for a deep transformation of the Union economy. Consistently with the 8th Environmental Action Programme, operators of installations covered by Directive 2010/75/EU should therefore be required to include transformation plans in their environmental management systems. Such transformation plans will also complement the Corporate Sustainability Reporting requirements under Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council75 by providing a means for concrete implementation of these requirements at installation level. The first priority is the transformation of energy- intensive activities listed in Annex I. Therefore, the operators of energy- intensive installations should produce transformation plans by 30 June 2030. Operators of installations carrying out other activities listed in Annex I should be required to produce transformation plans as part of the permit reconsideration and update following the publication of decisions on BAT conclusions published after 1 January 2030. Whilst the transformation plans should remain indicative documents prepared under the responsibility of the operators, trefore, the operators of activities listed in Annex I should produce transformation plans by 30 June 2027. After this date, competent authorities should be required to check that permits contain transformation plans in line with Union environmental and climate objectives Transformation plans should be regularly reviewed and updated in order to follow technological progress. The audit organisation contracted by the operators as part of their environmental management systems should check that they contain the minimum information to beset according to this Directive and set by the European Commission in an implementing delegated act, and the operators should make the transformation plans publicas well as the progress in their fulfilment publicly accessible and easy to find. _________________ 75 Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC; OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19–76.
Amendment 105 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Amendment 155 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Directive 2010/75/EU
The competent authority shall set the strictest possible emission limit values that are consistent with the lowest emissions achievable by applying the most effective BAT in the installation, and that ensure that, under normal operating conditions, emissions do not exceed the emission levels associated with the best available techniques (BAT- AELs) as laid down in the decisions on BAT conclusions referred to in Article 13(5). The emission limit values shall be based on an assessment by the operator analysing the technical non- feasibility of meeting the strictest end of the BAT-AEL range and demonstrating the best performance the installation can achieve by applying the most effective BAT as described in BAT conclusions. The emission limit values shall be set through either of the following:
Amendment 163 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a
3a. The competent authority shall set the strictest environmental performance limit values that are consistent with the best performance achievable by applying the most effective BAT in the installation, and that ensure that, under normal operating conditions, such performance limits values do not exceed the environmental performance levels associated with BATs as laid down in the decisions on BAT conclusions referred to in Article 13(5). The environmental performance limit values shall be based on an assessment by the operator analysing the technical non-feasibility of meeting the strictest end of the BAT- AEPL range and demonstrating the best performance the installation can achieve by applying most effective BAT(s) as described in BAT conclusions
Amendment 200 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 a (new) – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 27 a (new) – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The centre shall develop guidance on transformation indicators that contribute to the emergence of a sustainable, clean, non-toxic, circular and climate-neutral economy respecting the planetary boundaries by 2050.
Amendment 201 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 a (new) – paragraph 3 – point (g)
Article 27 a (new) – paragraph 3 – point (g)
(g) non-governmental organisations promoting environmental protectionthe protection of human health or the environment;
Amendment 205 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 b (new)
Article 27 b (new)
Without prejudice to Article 18, the competent authority may grant temporary derogations from the requirements set out in Article 15(2) and (3) and from the principles set out in Article 11, points (a) and (b), for the testing of emerging techniques for a total period of time not exceeding 124 months.
Amendment 214 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – title
Article 27 d (new) – title
Transformation towards a clean, non-toxic, circular and climate neutral industry
Amendment 220 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 1 – first part
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 1 – first part
Member States shall require that by 30 June 2030 27the operator includes in its environmental management system referred to in Article 14a a transformation plan for each installation carrying out any activity listed in points 1, 2, 3, 4, 6.1 a, and 6.1 b of Annex I. The transformation plan shall contain information on how the installation will transform itself during the 2030-2050 period in order to contribute to the emergence of a sustainable, clean, non- toxic, circular and climate-neutral economy by 2050, using the format referred to in paragraph 4.
Amendment 228 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 1 – second part
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 1 – second part
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that by 31 December 203128, the audit organisation contracted by the operator as part of its environmental management system assesses the conformity of the transformation plans referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 with the requirements set out in the implementing act referred to in paragraph 4.
Amendment 230 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 2 – first part
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 2 – first part
Amendment 241 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 2 – second part
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 2 – second part
Amendment 242 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Transformation plans shall include clear objectives, planned measures and a concrete timeline at least for each of these transformation indicators, taking into account the guidance developed in accordance with Article 27a (2b), where available: (a) climate neutrality, including a greenhouse gases emissions reduction pathway; (b) zero pollution, including measures planned regarding the phase out and substitution of substances of concern; (c) circularity, including a planned trajectory of the evolution of water, energy and virgin and secondary materials consumption; (d) ecosystem restoration; (e) local and sustainable economic development, including an estimate of the needs to re- and upskill the workforce; For each indicator intermediary targets at least for 2030, 2035 and 2040 shall be established.
Amendment 243 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 2 b (new)
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The operator shall annually assess the progress made towards intermediate targets and update its transformation plan every five years at the latest.
Amendment 247 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 3
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 3
3. The operator shall make its transformation plan, its updates as well as the results of the assessment referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 2b public, as part of the publication of its environmental management system.
Amendment 249 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities perform adequate checks of transformation plans, taking into account sectors and operators with the highest potential for transformation. Where competent authority finds the transformation plan inadequate to achieve the objectives of this Directive, the operator shall be required to adopt an updated plan within three months.
Amendment 253 #
2022/0104(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22
Directive 2010/75/EU
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 4
Article 27 d (new) – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall by 30 June1 December 20285, adopt an implementing act establishing the format for the transformation plans. This implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 75(2). delegated act accordance with Article 76 to supplement this Directive by establishing mandatory sector specific transformation indicators to be included and the format for the transformation plans.
Amendment 2 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
— having regard to the new Israeli Government´s Coalition Framework Agreement and Government Guidelines;
Amendment 12 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
— having regard to the Arab Peace Initiative of 2002,
Amendment 13 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 b (new)
Citation 15 b (new)
— having regard to the EU Guidelines on International Humanitarian Law and those on Human Rights Defenders,
Amendment 14 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 a (new)
Citation 18 a (new)
Amendment 29 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Amendment 36 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the Palestinian leadership has recognized the state of Israel and the establishment of a state of Palestine in the pre-1967 border , which has not been reciprocated by the successive Israeli governments; whereas the Palestinian leadership has repeatedly called for renewed peace talks leading to a two-state solution, which has not been reciprocated by the Israeli Government;
Amendment 52 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory has been ongoing for 55 years; whereas the number of settlersunder international law permanent occupation is unlawful; whereas the number of settlers and the construction of related infrastructure in the West Bank and East Jerusalem has dramatically increased since the signing of the Oslo Accords inand contravention of international law and the objective of peace; stitute a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-state solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace ; whereas this has profoundly changed the social and demographic landscape of the West Bank and led to the fragmentation of Palestinian areas; whereas Israel treats the settlements as a permanent and integral part of its territory, which is tantamount to de facto annexation; whereas this has severely undermined the possibility to establish a Palestinian state as part of a two-state solution and instead entrenched a one-state reality of unequal rights, perpetual occupation, and conflict; whereas major Israeli, Palestinian and international human rights organisations as well as several United Nations Special Rapporteurs have recently issued reports concluding that the Israeli government systemically oppresses and institutionally discriminates against Palestinians across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories;
Amendment 58 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas demolitions and seizures in the West Bank as well as the displacement of Palestinians continue increasing; whereas the separation wall in the West Bank constructed by Israel is illegal; whereas 2022 has been the deadliest year for Palestinians in nearly two decades;
Amendment 64 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
C b. whereas the new Israeli government in its coalition framework agreement and government guidelines lays claim to the occupied Palestinian territories, notably the West Bank; whereas coalition chairman and Member of Knesset Yariv Levin announced a government strategy of de-facto annexation of the West Bank; whereas all members of this government support at least partial annexations of Palestinian territories; whereas the new Israeli government has announced to advance and develop settlements in the West Bank; whereas the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies concluded from the coalition agreements that Israel is in the process of an accelerated annexation;
Amendment 91 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas EU funding includes a multiannual contribution to UNRWA, whose essential humanitarian and development work Parliament continually supports and advocates to be continued;
Amendment 93 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas the Palestinian Authority and Palestinian population in the West Bank and Gaza depend on international assistance; whereas the international assistance is essential to the stability of Palestine, Israel and the region at large; whereas according to international law Israel as an occupying power is required to ensure the protection and welfare of the occupied population;
Amendment 96 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Recital F b (new)
F b. whereas the Israeli Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) released on 20 October 2022 a new “Procedure for the Entry of Foreigners to the Areas of Judea and Samaria”, requiring third-country nationals, including EU-citizens, to request a permit to enter the West Bank as of October 2022; whereas the new COGAT rules restrict travel of foreign spouses to Palestinians, as well as of volunteers, academics or business people working in the West Bank, thus undermining relations between the EU and Palestine;
Amendment 114 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas the Palestinian Authority has adopted authoritarian practices, including a chilling campaign of repression cracking down on peaceful protests with unlawful force, targeting journalists, civil society activists, and lawyers with arbitrary arrests and torturing detainees; whereas according to Human Rights Watch Palestinian authorities are systematically mistreating and torturing Palestinians in detention, including critics and opponents; whereas Palestinian Authorities have failed to ensure accountability for the killing of Palestinian activist Nizar Banat;
Amendment 121 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Recital H b (new)
H b. whereas in October 2022 Palestinian President Abbas issued a decree to form the Higher Council of Judicial Authorities and Bodies, subordinating all Palestinian authorities under his control and dismantling the last pillar of judicial independence in Palestine; whereas according to the Palestinian Center for Human Rights the decree violates the Palestinian Basic law and is a grave breach of Palestine’s obligations, particularly under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);
Amendment 124 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
Recital H c (new)
H c. whereas the Palestinian Authority has consistently maintained security coordination with Israel; whereas the PA´s security coordination with Israel constitutes a contribution to the security of Israel; whereas large parts of the Palestinian public oppose the PA´s security coordination with Israel;
Amendment 125 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H d (new)
Recital H d (new)
H d. whereas the the European Union Police and Rule of Law Mission for the Palestinian Territory (EUPOL COPPS) was established in January 2006 to assists the Palestinian Authority in Palestinian state building; whereas studies show that the work of EUPOL COPPS promotes Palestinian policing practices that reproduce borders and spatial logics established by the occupation;
Amendment 127 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas socioeconomic and employment conditions in Palestine have severely deteriorated; whereas the Israeli occupation involvmposes significant restrictions on the Palestinian economy, whichdue to the the lack of control over land, water, physical boundaries, revenues and mobility which prevent the Palestinian society and economy from realising their potential; whereas UNCTAD estimates the economic cost for Palestinians of Israeli restrictions only on Area C of the West Bank at $50 billion between 2000 and 2020; whereas this inhibits Palestinian exports to the EU under the EU-PLO Interim Association Agreement; whereas this also undermines the effectiveness of EU aid and increases Palestinian dependence on foreign aid;
Amendment 135 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
I a. whereas the Israeli government frequently uses its authority over tax collection of the PA for punitive purposes; whereas in response to the adoption of a UN resolution calling for the ICJ to give an opinion on the legality of Israeli policies in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, Israel's new far-right government seized $39m of tax revenues collected on behalf of the Palestinian Authority; whereas more than 90 countries in a statement expressed their "deep concern" about Israel´s punitive measures;
Amendment 145 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Recital I b (new)
Amendment 149 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I c (new)
Recital I c (new)
I c. whereas a study commissioned by the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament (AFET) entitled: “Prospects for reinvigorating the Middle East Peace Process” concluded that the so-called Abraham Accords served attempts to further derail and marginalise the Palestinians;
Amendment 157 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) reiterate the EU’s strong support for the two-state solution, as the only viable solution to the conflict, with the state of Israel and the state of Palestine living side by side, together in peace, security and mutual recognition under the 1967 borders with mutually agreed upon equivalent land swaps and Jerusalem as the capital of both states; reiterate the EU’s commitment to equal rights of all Israelis and Palestinians;
Amendment 168 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) continue to underline that Israeli settlements in the oPt are illegal and constitute a major impediment to the viability and prospects of the two-state solution; call for an end to all actions that undermine the viability of the two-state solution on the ground; consider targeted EU measures against Israeli individuals leading the planning of settlement expansion in the West Bank or implementing annexation; prevent EU- based operators from doing business with and in illegal settlements or annexed territories; ensure that all EU policies and EU-funded programmes with Israel comply with international and EU law;
Amendment 177 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
(c) stress the importance of direct negotiations between Israel and Palestine based on internationally agreed parameters and remind both sides of the importance of the participation of women in all levels of the negotiations; set up a European peace initiative in order to restore a political horizon for fair, comprehensive, long-lasting peace between Israel and Palestine;
Amendment 192 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) support Palestinian calls for renewed and inclusive political representation; strongly urge the PLO, PA and President Abbas to hold free and fair nationlegislative and presidential elections in order to strengthen the legitimacy of the Palestinian political leadership; call on Israel to respect its obligations to allow these elections to take placeurge the Palestinian leadership in the West Bank and Hamas to provide for the necessary conditions to hold free and fair elections, including an independent judiciary and the respect for freedom of expression; call on Israel to respect its obligations to allow these elections to take place in East Jerusalem; provide all necessary political and technical assistance to facilitate this process, notably in East Jerusalem; promote the participation of youth and women;
Amendment 207 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) strongly call for East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip to be brought under one legitimate, democratic PA rule; facilitate political consensus and reconciliation among Palestinian political factionsnational dialogue reconciliation and consensus-building among all political and societal actors in Palestine; stress the importance of democratic elections and their results being respected by all parties involved, including by the EU;
Amendment 216 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) encourage measures to include youth and women in all levels of societal decision-making regardless of their socio- economic background; call for concrete measures to be enacted to fight discrimination against women and LGBTQI+ persons as well as human rights defenders, activists, journalists and artists;
Amendment 220 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) urge the PA to eliminate repressive restrictions on the funding and registration of non-governmental organisations and to respect the freedom of assembly and expression; urge the PA to respect the exercise of freedom of association, peaceful assembly and expression and the right to public participation, both offline and online and in conformity with international law and standards;
Amendment 230 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) demand that the PA establish independent and reliable mechanisms to investigate occurrences of torture or ill- treatment in line with its obligation under the Optional Protocol of the Convention Against Torture which it acceded to in 2017; support an independent investigation into the death of Nizar Banat and call for those responsible to be held accountable; urge Palestinian authorities to hold security forces accountable for arbitrary arrest, abuse and torture;
Amendment 243 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) call on the PA to guarantee respect for the principles of the rule of law, and establish the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary by repealing the decree of October 2022 establishing the Supreme Council of Judicial Bodies and Authorities also in order to restore public confidence in institutions;
Amendment 255 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l
Paragraph 1 – point l
(l) comply with the commitment to fully and effectively implement existing EU legislation and the bilateral arrangements applicable to settlement products; ensure that the principle of legal differentiation between the territory of the state of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967 is applied consistently to the full scope of EU bilateral relations with Israel, in accordance with existing CJEU rulings and UNSC Resolution 2334; demand the adoption of EU legislation banning trade with settlements in the oPt, in compliance with international humanitarian law;
Amendment 261 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
(l a) is concerned about the new restrictive policy on the entry and stay of foreigners in the West Bank adopted by Israel which impedes exchange between EU citizens and Palestinians; discuss with Israel its obligation to abide by the reciprocity requirements under its visa- free regime with the EU;
Amendment 264 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m
Paragraph 1 – point m
(m) engage with the PA to jointly establish a more regular political dialogue at the ministerial level and toconvene an Association Council; launch, as soon as possible, negotiations on a full association agreement between the EU and Palestine; convene an association council when an agreement has been reacheddesignate the EU Office in Palestine to a fully-fledged EU Delegation;
Amendment 269 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
(m a) press for the reopening of Palestinian institutions in annexed East Jerusalem, as stipulated in the 2003 Roadmap; host regular meetings with Palestinian officials in East Jerusalem and support their engagement in the political, economic, social and cultural development of East Jerusalem; oppose efforts to impose Israeli curricula on Palestinian schools;
Amendment 274 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
Paragraph 1 – point n
(n) work towards an immediate end to the blockade of the Gaza Strip including the possibility for Palestinians to travel outside for work, study, medical reasons or to visit family relatives in the West Bank as well as the circulation of goods;
Amendment 294 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) enhance funding, including humanitarian aid and development assistance, for the green transition, good governanceyouth participation, democratisation and anti- corruption efforts, including public financial management reform; ensure continuous funding for essential services for the Palestinian people including education and health; expand aid to Palestinian civil society, including to human rights defenders under attack;
Amendment 302 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
(p a) continue and expand EU funding and programmes in vulnerable areas around East Jerusalem and rural areas of the West Bank and actively defend the rights of Palestinians living in Area C;
Amendment 303 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point p b (new)
(p b) call on Israel to reduce physical and administrative restrictions on Palestinian economic activities and trade, and to cease favouring Israeli settler companies over Palestinians, as regards construction permits, licensing for operation, and access to natural resources in Area C;
Amendment 304 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p c (new)
Paragraph 1 – point p c (new)
Amendment 305 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p d (new)
Paragraph 1 – point p d (new)
(p d) protect and strengthen Palestinian civil space by increasing aid to Palestinian civil society organisations, including human rights defenders under attack; implement the EU Guidelines on human rights defenders, taking concrete action when HRDs and CSOs are under attack; privately and publicly condemn and take action against initiatives contributing to the shrinking space for civil society in Palestine; consistently consult Palestinian CSOs and HRDs in EU policy-making and positioning towards the situation in Israel and Palestine; urge Israeli authorities to reverse their unfounded designation of leading Palestinian civil society groups as “terrorist organisations” and allow them to continue their vital work;
Amendment 307 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
Paragraph 1 – point q
(q) provide Palestinian partners with long-term planning security and predictability by accompanying the 2021- 2024 joint strategy with a multiannual action plan; underlines that the European Commission must not suspend any funds to Palestinian civil society or the Palestinian Authority without tangible evidence of misuse;
Amendment 309 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r
Paragraph 1 – point r
(r) express concern about how EU policy and effectiveness of financial assistance in Palestine are undermined by illegal settlements, the Israeli occupation and related restrictions on the Palestinian economy; demand compensation for the demolition of all EU-funded infrastructure in the oPt; bring policies towards Israel in line with the EUʼs goal to the achievement of an “independent, democratic and viable Palestinian State and the Two-State solution” and hold the Israeli government to account for explicit opposition to and policies that obstruct a viable Palestinian state;
Amendment 319 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(r a) review the mandate of EU POL COPPS and focuses on ensuring the viability of the two-state-solution on the ground, guaranteeing the right for Palestinian self-determination;
Amendment 320 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point r b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point r b (new)
Amendment 321 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point s
Paragraph 1 – point s
(s) advocate the adjustmentoverhaul of the Paris Protocol on Economic Relations to provide the PA with more autonomy in economic and fiscal governance, for instance by allowing them to set their own VAT ratfiscal policy (e.g.VAT rates) and tax collection; urge Israeli authorities to refrain from non- transparent deductions of tax revenues to the Palestinian authorities for political purposes;
Amendment 325 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t
Paragraph 1 – point t
(t) exclude the PA Ministry of Interior from EU financial assistance through PEGASE to the PA, while retaining the overall level of financial support, until authorities take effective steps to end arbitrary arrests and torture and to investigate and prosecute those responsible for abuses; consider redirecting funds dedicated to the PA Ministry of Interior to Palestinian civil society and human rights watchdogs until the ministry fulfils benchmarks;
Amendment 326 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point t a (new)
(t a) support the initiative by the Palestinian Authority, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, to request an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories; defend the ICC and insist that the EU and Member States continues to support its work in investigating potential violations of the Rome Statute;
Amendment 328 #
2021/2207(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point t b (new)
(t b) take action to ensure unhindered access by MEPs and EP bodies to Palestine, in particular the Gaza strip;
Amendment 336 #
2021/2207(INI)
(u) ensure continued and additional financial support to Palestinian refugees through UNRWA to meet the increasing needs on the ground; earmark the additional funds for the agency incorporated in the joint text on the EU general budget for 2023 towards UNRWA’s core programme budget, which supports the delivery of core essential services;
Amendment 55 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the importance of both the new Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) – Global Europe and the EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020–2024 for this goal; recalls that the use of the rule of qualified majority voting within the Council on human rights issues would result in a more effective and proactive EU foreign and security policy, and would strengthen cooperation on matters of key strategic interest for the EU, while reflecting its fundamental values; stresses the importance of Member States taking ownership of the EU Action Plan and publicly reporting on their action under this strategic document; encourages national and regional parliaments, national human rights institutions and local civil society organizations to engage with their authorities at Member State level on their contribution to the conduct of the EU's external human rights policy;
Amendment 62 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. calls for greater transparency regarding human rights-related provisions in financing agreements under the NDICI and a clarification of the mechanism and criteria for the suspension of such agreements in the event of a breach of human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law as well as in cases of serious cases of corruption; calls on the Commission to strictly refrain from using budget support to third countries’ governments as an operational modality for aid delivery in countries witnessing widespread violations of human rights and repression of HRDs;
Amendment 73 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for the EU to take particular care to assess and prevent any violation linked to the Union’s own policies, projects and funding in third countries, including by creating a complaints mechanism for individuals or groups whose rights may have been violated by EU activities in these countries;
Amendment 74 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Amendment 80 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that the right to self- determination is a human right, enshrined inter alia in the UN Charter and the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, as well as an erga omnes obligation, as recalled by the International Court of Justice in its advisory opinion on the Chagos Archipelago of 2019 and the recent rulings of the EU Court of Justice on Western Sahara; calls on the EU and Member States to uphold this human right in their dealings with the relevant territories;
Amendment 85 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law is a cross-cutting objective in the whole NDICI – Global Europe Instrument as stipulated in Article 3 (objectives) of the Regulation; underlines the importance of the Human Rights and Democracy thematic programme adopted under the NDICI – Global Europe Instrument for the promotion of human rights around the world; calls for the level and creativity of the funding to civil society and human rights defenders provided under the NDICI's thematic programme on human rights and democracy, including to ProtectDefenders.eu and the European Endowment for Democracy, to reflect the seriousness of the current illiberal backlash and the shrinking of the civil society space worldwide;
Amendment 101 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that the visibility of the EUSR’s role should be enhanced in order to have a meaningful impact on human rights; underlines that the EUSR has a flexible mandate which could be adapted to evolving circumstances; is of the opinion that the EUSR’s position could be made more effective by enhancing communication activities and developing a more public profile through, inter alia, the publication of public statements in support of human rights activists at risk, including Sakharov Prize laureates and finalists, and of human rights defenders imprisoned for long periods, thereby helping to protect their physical integrity and their essential work; stresses the importance for the EUSR on HR to cooperate closely with the EUSRs on countries and regions with a view to streamline human rights into EU regional policies;
Amendment 106 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Reiterates the commitment undertaken in the EU Guidelines on human rights defenders to raise individual cases of human rights defenders at risk during EU human rights dialogues with partner/third countries, and deplores the lack of consistency in ensuring such cases are raised on these occasions; expects the European External Action Service to pay particular attention to the individual cases raised by the Parliament, notably in its urgency resolutions, as well as to the Sakharov Prize laureates at risk, and to report back on action taken on such cases;
Amendment 125 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Condemns the increase in attempts to undermine the functioning of the UN’s bodies, in particular the Human Rights Council, and to obstruct the rules-based international order; strongly condemns all attacks against UN Special Procedure mandate holders and against the independence of their mandates; calls on the EU Member States and the EU’s democratic partners to decisively counter these attempts and to strengthen their response to serious violations of international human rights; reiterates its call on the EU and Member States to step up their financial support to these Special procedures and treaty bodies; stresses that state sovereignty cannot be used as a pretext to avoid human rights monitoring by the international community since, according to the Founding Charter of the United Nations and UN General Assembly resolution 60/251, all states, regardless of their political, economic and cultural systems, have the duty and the responsibility to promote and protect all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, and the UN Human Rights Council should address situations of violations of human rights;
Amendment 129 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on all members of the UN General Assembly Committee on Non- Governmental Organizations that reviews applications by NGOs for ECOSOC consultative status to be guided by the sole consideration of the general interest rather than politicised objectives of restricting access by reputable organizations; supports the EU call for the approval of the long-delayed applications from certain NGOs;
Amendment 130 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Amendment 131 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 c (new)
Paragraph 14 c (new)
14c. Denounces the reprisals and intimidation against some 240 individual members of civil society, activists and journalists in 45 countries for cooperating with the UN over the past year, as reported by the United Nations Secretary General; calls on the EU and Member States to take robust action against such reprisals, including by a global demarche towards the countries concerned, and to take all possible measures to help provide safe and open spaces for interaction by individuals and civil society organizations with the United Nations, its representatives and mechanisms;
Amendment 135 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Reiterates its strong support for the International Criminal Court (ICC) as the only international institution able to prosecute some of the world’s most heinous crimes and to bring justice to their victims; calls on the EU and the Member States to provide adequate financial support to enable the ICC to carry out its tasks; supports the universality of the Rome Statute and calls for the EU to include a specific clause on its ratification and access in agreements to be concluded with third countries, and to include it under the future GSP scheme; strongly condemns any attack on the staff or on the independence of the ICC; is of the opinion that attempts to undermine the credibility and essential role of the ICC constitute attacks on multilateralism and should be contested as such by the EU and its Member States, including when originating from close partner countries; stresses that the ICC needs full access to the countries it investigates to be able to perform its tasks; underlines the potential of other innovative tools to bring perpetrators of international crimes to account, including universal jurisdiction at national-level judiciaries; underlines, in this context, the current discussions in the UN International Law Commission on the immunity of state officials and calls for follow-up to them; calls for the EU to continue to strengthen capacity building at national level in third countries, while supporting international criminal tribunals and mechanisms, as well as platforms and organisations dedicated to the fight against impunity such as the Coalition for the International Criminal Court;
Amendment 172 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Call for an EU-wide scheme for issuing short-term visas for the temporary relocation of human rights defenders, in particular through the inclusion of instructions in the EU Visa Handbook and amending the legal instruments on visas, particularly the Visa Code; deplores the little progress on this issue over the past year and alerts that the current situation in Afghanistan must be a wake- up call on the need to urgently revisit, in a meaningful way, a more coordinated EU policy regarding the issuing by Member States of emergency visas for human rights defenders;
Amendment 176 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Expresses its serious concern about the restriction of academic freedom and the increase in the censorship and imprisonment of scholars worldwide, which has important consequences for the right to education; urges the EU and the Member States to step up their diplomatic efforts through bilateral and multilateral engagement in relation to threats or attacks on academic freedom by state and non-state actors; calls on the EEAS and the Commission to revisit existing support and protection mechanisms for HRDs, in order to develop the capacity to identify and provide assistance, including emergency protection and support, in cases involving attacks on academic freedom; calls on the Commission to ensure continued high-level support to the European Inter-University Centre for Human Rights and Democratisation and the Global Campus of Human Rights and Democracy, as a flagship of the EU’s support to human rights education worldwide;
Amendment 177 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Denounces the increasing practice by authoritarian states of hosting mega sports or cultural events in order to boost their international legitimacy whilst further restricting domestic dissent; calls on the EU and Member States to engage with national sports federations, corporate actors and civil society organizations on the modalities of their participation in such events, including with regards to the Olympic Games in Beijing in 2022; calls for the development of an EU policy framework on sports and human rights;
Amendment 198 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Urges the EU to seek to counter the effects of the global climate crisis inter alia by introducing effective and sustainable policy actions and to comply with the goals of the Paris Agreement; stresses that biodiversity and human rights are interlinked and interdependent and recalls the human rights obligations of States to protect the biodiversity on which those rights depend, including by providing for the participation of citizens in biodiversity-related decisions and providing access to effective remedies in cases of biodiversity loss and degradation;
Amendment 235 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Reiterates its call for the EU and its Member States to step up their efforts to eliminate all forms of abuse against children; welcomes the new EU Strategy on the Rights of the Child adopted by the Commission, but stresses that children continue to be victims of violence, early and forced marriage, sexual abuse, including genital mutilation, trafficking, child labour and recruitment as child soldiers, and that they suffer from a lack of access to education and healthcare, and from malnutrition and poverty, in particular in humanitarian crises and armed conflicts; stresses that 2021 is the International Year for the Elimination of Child Labour; calls for the streamlining of the rights of the child and the children and armed conflicts (CAAC) agenda in all the EU’s external policies; urges the EU to ensure that its trade and development policies work in full coherence in order to eradicate child labour; in this regard, highlights the pilot multi-stakeholder dialogue on sustainable cocoa; calls on the Member States to uphold their responsibilities with regard to the protection of foreign fighters’ children who are EU citizens;
Amendment 249 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Notes with great concern the scale and consequences of caste hierarchies, caste-based discrimination and the perpetuation of caste-based human rights violations, including the denial of access to the legal system or employment, continued segregation, poverty and stigmatisation, and caste-related barriers to the exercise of basic human rights and facilitation of human development; reiterates its call for the EU and its Member States to intensify efforts and support initiatives at the UN and in the relevant third countries to eliminate caste discrimination;
Amendment 281 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Recalls the obligations of States to protect the rights of their national, ethnic, cultural, religious or linguistic minorities within their respective territories; calls on the Commission to support the protection of the rights of persons belonging to minorities worldwide, including as a priority under its human rights and democracy thematic programme;
Amendment 290 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Considers that corruption also constifacilitates, perpetuates a majornd institutionalises violations of human rights and disproportionately affects the most vulnerable and marginalised individuals and groups in society; insists that the EU and its Member States must address it as such in their external action by applying the highest transparency standards to their funding to third countries, as well as by supporting anti-corruption civil society organisations, journalists and whistle- blowers, promoting the establishment of effective anti-corruption institutions and the adoption of robust regulatory frameworks and addressing secrecy jurisdictions and tax havens; deplores that EU-based individuals and entities are regularly reported to be directly involved in grave acts of corruption in third countries, including as initiators, enablers or end-receivers; calls on the EU to acknowledge and address the complicity of EU-based actors in the global phenomenon of corruption;
Amendment 308 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Welcomes the adoption of the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime (EU GHRSR-EU Magnitsky Act) as an essential addition to the EU’s human rights and foreign policy toolbox, which strengthens the EU’s role as a global human rights actor by allowing it to take restrictive measures against legal and natural persons involved in grave human rights violations in the world; condemns any arbitrary and unjustified retaliatory restrictive measures imposed on the EU or other entities as a response to the EU’s decisions under the EU GHRSR-EU Magnitsky Act; regrets the fact that the Council has decided to apply unanimity instead of qualified majority voting when adopting sanctions on human rights issues;
Amendment 316 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Calls for the extensadoption of the scope of the EU GHRSR-EU Magnitsky Act to includea new thematic sanctions regime to address serious acts of corruption in order to ensure inter alia the effective targeting of the economic and financial enablers of human rights abusers, thus complementing the EU GHRSR; stresses the need for an effective strategy to implement the EU GHRSR-EU Magnitsky Act, consistent both with the EU’s other external policies, in particular with its human rights policies, and with the existing international frameworks on sanctions, international criminal law and international humanitarian law; welcomes the Commission’s announcement that in 2021, it will conduct a review of practices undermining sanctions and of the existing reporting obligations for Member States on their implementation and enforcement;
Amendment 326 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Reaffirms the inalienable human rights of migrants and refugees, and calls for the EU and its Member States to fully uphold them in their cooperation with third countries, both in terms of the establishment of high legal standards and, equally importantly, their operationalisation in order to ensure the effective protection of these rights in practice; reiterates its call on the Commission to carry out a review of the human rights impact of migration policy frameworks and of the EU’s cooperation on migration with third countries; underlines the risks related to informal arrangements on return and readmission, which are not subject to judicial scrutiny and therefore do not allow for effective redress for human rights violations suffered by migrants and asylum seekersintegrate pre-assessment as well as monitoring mechanisms to evaluate the human rights impact of cooperation on migration with third countries, and to increase transparency and ensure parliamentary scrutiny and democratic oversight over its activity in this area; underlines the risks related to informal arrangements on return and readmission, which are not subject to judicial scrutiny and therefore do not allow for effective redress for human rights violations suffered by migrants and asylum seekers; reiterates, therefore, its call on the EU to ensure that all migration cooperation and readmission agreements with non-EU states strictly comply with international human rights, refugee and maritime law, particularly with the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees; emphasises as well the need to delink development cooperation from cooperation on readmission or migration management; insists that human rights need to be mainstreamed and monitored in all the activities carried out by Frontex and EASO;
Amendment 348 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Amendment 355 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Insists on the importance of ensuring the coherence of EU policy in relation to situations of occupation or annexation of territory; recalls that international humanitarian law should guide EU policy in relation to all such situations, including in cases of protracted occupation; highlights the responsibility of EU-based corporations to apply the most stringent due diligence policy towards any economic or financial activity in or with these territories, and to ensure strict compliance to international law as well as to EU sanctions policy when applicable towards these situations;
Amendment 358 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Welcomes the new concept of EU peace mediation, extending the EU’s toolbox of crisis management tools to the broader goal of conflict transformation, and encourages the development of further dialogue tools and capacities in this field; reiterates its call on the Member States to help contain armed conflicts and serious violations of human rights or international humanitarian law by strictly abiding by the provisions of Article 7 of the UN Arms Trade Treaty on Export and Export Assessment and of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports, including by refusing any transfer of arms and surveillance equipment which would result in the risk that the importing state or non-state actors may commit or facilitate violations of human rights or international humanitarian law; reiterates its calls for stricter EU-wide controls on EU arms exports, better end-use control of exported arms, more coordination of national decisions on arms exports, a publicly accessible database on national arms exports and, for arms subsidised through the European Defence Fund, a sanctions mechanism for breaches of the eight EU export criteria;
Amendment 369 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Emphasises that the EU has a unique opportunity to exert leverage on businesses to uphold human rights at global level with the upcoming EU binding legislation on corporate due diligence and corporate accountability, obliging companies to prevent, identifyidentify, prevent, communicate, account for and remedy potential and/or actual adverse impacts on human rights, the environment and good governance in their value chain; calls for the strategy to apply to all large undertakings governed by the law of a Member State, established in the territory of the Union or operating in the internal market, as well as publicly listed small and medium-sized companies (SMEs) and SMEs in high risk sectors; stresses the need to establish and enforce sanctions to make the legislation effective; calls and ensure a level playing field for undertakings; considers it a necessary element for companies’ due diligence strategies to be made public; welcomes the full entry into force in 2020 of the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation and the EU Taxonomy Regulation as constructive steps in this field;
Amendment 396 #
2021/2181(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Stresses the specific threat that the new digital technologies pose for human rights defenders, opposition figures, journalists and others in controlling, restricting and undermining their activities, as illustrated recently by the Pegasus revelations; calls on the EU to take an initiative to promote an immediate, global moratorium on the sale, transfer and use of spyware technology and the adoption of a robust regulatory framework in this field; calls on the EU and Member States to ensure full due human rights diligence and proper vetting of exports of European surveillance technology and technical assistance; calls on the EU and Member States to engage with third country governments to end repressive cybersecurity and counter- terrorism legislation practices and legislation;
Amendment 26 #
2021/2066(INI)
A. whereas corruption is a human rights violation, directly undermining the enjoymentfacilitates, perpetuates and institutionalises violations of human rights, directly undermining the observance and implementation of human rights and disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable and marginalised individuals and groups in society, barring them, in particular women, from equal access to political participation, basic services, justice, natural resources, jobs, education, health and housing, while exacerbating poverty and inequalityundermining governance, misappropriating wealth and public goods and exacerbating poverty and inequality, in some cases even leading to loss of life;
Amendment 41 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas fighting corruption is an integral part of the international commitments to fulfil human rights, protect the planet and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity by 2030, in the framework of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 16 to promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies, which commits the international community notably to strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets;
Amendment 52 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas corruption undermines institutions, checks and balances and democratic principles, weakens the rule of law, corrodes public trust and impedes sustainable development, leading to the impunity of perpetrators, the illicit enrichment of those in power and power- grabbing to escape prosecution; whereas corruption is a major factor of conflict and destabilises peacebuilding efforts;
Amendment 59 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas financial secrecy is a key facilitator of corruption; whereas illicit financial flows from developing countries are facilitated and encouraged by secrecy jurisdictions and tax havens, as well as financial and legal actors, notably from within the European Union;
Amendment 60 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Germany and Malta rank respectively 6th, 8th, 14th and 18th out of 133 countries on the 2020 Financial Secrecy Index of the Tax Justice Network, which ranks jurisdictions according to their secrecy and the scale of their offshore financial activities;
Amendment 61 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
D c. whereas EU-based individuals and entities are regularly reported by investigative journalists and civil society organizations to be directly involved in grave acts of corruption in third countries, including as initiators, enablers or end-receivers; whereas the investigation and prosecution of such crimes remains very limited;
Amendment 88 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the adoption of the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime (EU Magnitsky Act) is an essential addition to the EU’s toolbox; whereas Parliament has requested the extenscreation of its scope to includea complementary sanctions regime in order to address acts of corruption; whereas the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom have adopted similaruch anti-corruption sanctions regimes;
Amendment 99 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) placeacknowledge the interrelationship between corruption and human rights and thus adopt a human rights-based approach to the fight against corruption fr, with victims of corruptiont and centre in allState responsibility placed at its core, and place the fight against corruption prominently in EU efforts and policies promoting human rights and democracy around the world;
Amendment 104 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) recognise the own role and responsibility of a critical number of individuals and entities based in the European Union, as the initiators, enablers and beneficiaries of corruption in third countries; address therefore the phenomenon of corruption as a global one, which requires robust action also within the European Union, including through effective anti-corruption institutions and regulatory framework, asset recovery and criminal prosecution;
Amendment 105 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a b (new)
(a b) acknowledge that corruption is closely related to activities such as money laundering, tax evasion and illicit trade; in this light, consider that transparency should be the cornerstone of all anti- corruption strategies and include: lifting excessive professional secrecy; automatic exchange of information on tax matters; public country-by-country reporting of multinationals and public registries of beneficial owners of companies;
Amendment 123 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) insist on the full implementation and enforcement of existing national and international anti-corruption instruments such as the UNCAC, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the Council of Europe’s Criminal Law Convention on Corruption; launch an inclusive and comprehensive process tocarry out the long-delayed review of the EU’s implementation of the UNCAC;
Amendment 124 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) recognise that the return of misappropriated assets stolen by, and the identification of the odious debt contracted under authoritarian regimes are, beyond their economic significance, a moral imperative with significant implications in terms of justice and accountability, as well for the credibility of the Union’s democracy support policy; draw lessons from its experience of asset recovery involving the Arab Spring countries, including with regard to shortcomings in the EU and Member States’ legal and policy frameworks, as well as at international level, on this matter; draft a communication outlining possible initiatives at EU and international levels to ensure swift and efficient recovery of illicitly acquired assets following democratic transition processes in third countries and to ensure that there are no safe havens for assets stolen by corrupt regimes within the European financial system in particular and around the globe in general; advance efforts in all EU Member States to freeze and confiscate stolen assets in their jurisdictions, in line with the UNCAC, and to return them in a transparent and accountable manner to the country of origin; , including by involving civil society organizations;
Amendment 130 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(f a) advance efforts to ensure that victims of corruption –individuals as well as communities – are identified, informed and receive compensation for the damages caused by corruption when cases are resolved by court decisions or out of court;
Amendment 134 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) strengthen the credibility of EU external anti-corruption action by more effectively combating corruption and money laundering within the EU and by stepping up the investigation and prosecution of EU entities and individuals involved in acts of corruption in or involving third countries; recognise that systemic corruption in some EU Member States and the failure to effectively prosecute foreign bribery undermines anti- corruption efforts in third countries; recognise that a lack of determined action, delays and a gap in implementing the anti- corruption regulations within the EU emboldens enablers of global corruption within the EU and corrupt actors outside of the EU;
Amendment 141 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(g a) acknowledge that international reviews conducted by the OECD Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes and the Financial Action Task Force have documented serious shortcomings in the Member States, and take corrective action with a view to strengthening the EU's external credibility in these areas;
Amendment 152 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) mainstream a rights-based anti- corruption approach into EU external action in the programming of the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI), the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) and the EU trust funds; prioritise binding anti-corruption commitments with targets and timetables; strengthen monitoring and enforcement; improve communication between specialised EU agencies and partners on the ground; invest in digital and data- driven methods to fight corruption; ensure a consistent, comprehensive and accessible data base of the ultimate beneficiaries of EU funds across the full procurement cycle;
Amendment 161 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(i a) suspend the use of budget support as an aid-delivery modality in countries where corruption is widespread and where authorities manifestly fail to take genuine action; insist that the Commission, in the context of budget support, pays particular attention to the transparency in operations involving privatisation of and deals related to public assets, notably land, and to participate in OECD support programmes for developing countries in corporate governance of state owned enterprises;
Amendment 181 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
Paragraph 1 – point n
(n) monitor the corruption risks involved in authoritarian third countries’ large-scale construction and investment projects, undertaken globally but also in Member States, particularly in the energy and, extractive, infrastructure and arms sectors; note that these projects often raise concerns of non- transparent financing or fiscal risks; proceed with the swift implementation of the EU’s ‘Globally Connected Europe’ programme, approved by the Council on 12 July 2021, with the potential to counter these efforts;
Amendment 189 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
Paragraph 1 – point p
(p) design programmes to promote the adoption and implementation of comprehensive legislation on whistleblower protection and to provide more financial support to CSOs, independent media, whistleblowers and HRDs working on preventing and exposing corruption, advancing transparency and accountability, including support against strategic lawsuits (strategic lawsuits against public participation, SLAPP suits) and the establishment of an ambitious and effective EU anti-SLAPP directive, that also ensures protection from judicial harassment triggered in relation to the denunciation of corruption cases outside EU borders; improve smaller CSOs’ access to EU funding;
Amendment 197 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q
Paragraph 1 – point q
(q) strengthen protection of witnesses, whistleblowers and anti-corruption HRDs, including through the allocation of dedicated resources to EU delegations and Member States representations, the issuing of emergency visas and providing temporary visa schemlter in EU Member States;
Amendment 220 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point v
Paragraph 1 – point v
(v) welcome the landmark political declaration on corruption adopted by the UN General Assembly and take this opportunity to follow up on its recommendations and strengthen cooperation with UN bodies such as the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC); insist on the importance of systematic civil society participation in UN-level discussions and monitoring mechanisms on corruption;
Amendment 234 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z
Paragraph 1 – point z
(z) support the establishment of an International Anti-Corruption Court, which would serve as a court of last resort to prosecute cases of grand corruption; advance discussions about an international infrastructure to address the impunity of powerful individuals involved in large-scale corruption cases, including international investigative mechanisms, prosecutors and courts;
Amendment 252 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ae a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point ae a (new)
(ae a) support the reform, both within the EU and worldwide, of beneficial ownership laws, in order to enable appropriate transparency of ownership of trusts and shell companies and thus to allow victims of corruption-related human rights violations, as well as law enforcement and tax authorities, to identify the effective owner of such entities;
Amendment 253 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point ae b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point ae b (new)
(ae b) encourage third countries to allocate adequate resources for national contact points and to establish other non- judicial grievance mechanisms to provide remedies to individuals and communities affected by corrupt business practices;
Amendment 256 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – subheading 8
Paragraph 1 – subheading 8
Sanctioning corruption through the EU Magnitsky Acta new EU anti-corruption sanctions regime
Amendment 261 #
2021/2066(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point af
Paragraph 1 – point af
(af) swiftly come forward with a legislative proposal to acomplemendt the current EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime by extending its scope to include acts ofstablishing a new EU thematic sanctions regime, dedicated to address acts of corruption; address the particular responsibility of individuals and entities that enable corruption; note the risk of corrupt actors moving their assets to the EU as more and more countries adopt stricter frameworks;
Amendment 287 #
2021/2056(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Warns of the high average age of the fleet in small-scale fishing, which means a programme to renew and update the small-scale fleet is needed with a view to improving safety and on-board living conditions, improving energy efficiency andfacilitating the energy transition and improving environmental sustainability, while ensuring the social and economic sustainability of the fishing communities that depend on the fleet;
Amendment 292 #
2021/2056(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Considers that the renewal of the fleet through the construction of new vessels is necessary in cases of developing alternative propulsion systems aligned with the EU Green Deal and the decarbonisation of the fishing fleet; further considers that this will also contribute to a reduction in operational costs;
Amendment 295 #
2021/2056(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Reiterates that the renewal of the fleet is necessary for improving the safety, the working conditions and the economic and environmental sustainability of activities, and therefore cannot be confused with expanding it or increasing fishing capacity;
Amendment 302 #
2021/2056(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Takes the view that ignoring the need for fleet renewal, particularly ofbut not only obsolete and inefficient vessels, would jeopardise the future of small-scale fishing;
Amendment 351 #
2021/2056(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Believes therefore that management initiatives at local level through co-management need to be considered eligible for EMFAF funding;
Amendment 97 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Commission’s Communication on the European Green Deal35 emphasised that Europe should leverage the potential of the digital transformation, which is a key enabler for reaching the Green Deal objectives. The Union should promote and invest in the necessary digital transformation as digital technologies are a critical enabler fordigital technologies designed to attaining the sustainability goals of the Green Deal in many different sectors. Digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, 5G, cloud and edge computing and the internet of things canshould accelerate and maximise the impact of policies to deal with climate change and protect the environment. Digitalisation also presents new opportunities for distance monitoring of air and water pollution, orand for monitoring and optimising how energy and natural resources are used. Europe needs a digital sector that puts sustainability at its heart, ensuring that digital infrastructures and technologies become verifiably more sustainable and energy- and resource efficient, and contribute to a sustainable circular and climate-neutral economy and society in line with the European Green Deal. _________________ 35 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “The European Green deal”, 11.12.2019, COM/2019/640 final.
Amendment 105 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In order to follow the trajectory of the Union regarding the pace of digital transformation, digital targets should be established. These targets should be linked to concrete areas, where progress should collectively be made within the UnionDigital targets should be established, rigorously guided by clear societal objectives. The targets follow the four cardinal points identified in the Digital Compass Communication, identified as the essential areas for the digital transformation of the Union: digital skills, digital infrastructures, digitalisation of businesses and of public services.
Amendment 115 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Digital skills, basic and advanced, are essential to reinforce the collective resilience of the Union’s society. Digitally empowered and capable citizens will be able to take advantage of the opportunities of the Digital Decade. Moreover, digital training and education should support a workforce in which people can acquire specialised digital skills to get quality jobs and rewarding careers in much greater numbers than today, with convergence between women and men. In addition, an essential enabler for taking advantage of the benefits of digitisation, for further technological developments and foreliminating and avoiding gender divides. In addition, Europe’s digital leadership ineeds a sustainable digital infrastructure for connectivity, microelectronics and the ability to process vast data. ExcellenReliable, fast and secure connectivity for everybody and everywhere in Europe including in rural and remote areas40 is needed. Societal needs for upload and download bandwidth are constantly growing. By 2030, networks with gigabit speeds should become available at accessible conditions for all those who need or wish such capacity. Moreover, microprocessors which are already today at the start of most of the key, strategic value chains are expected to be in even higher demand in the future, in particular the most innovative ones. Climate neutral highly secure edge node guaranteeing access to data services with low latency wherever businesses are located and quantum capacity are also expected to be critical enablers. _________________ 40 Long-term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas. COM(2021) 345 final.
Amendment 122 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Beyond enablers, all the above mentioned technologies will be at the core of new products, new manufacturing processes and new business models based on fair and secure sharing of data in the data economy, while ensuring effective protection of privacy and data protection. The transformation of businesses will depend on their ability to adopt new digital technologies rapidly and across the board, including in industrial and services ecosystems that are currently lagging behind.
Amendment 129 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Democratic life and public services will also crucially depend on digital technologies and therefore they should be fully accessible for everyone, as a best–in- class digital environment providing for easy-to-use, efficient and personalised services and tools with high security and privacy standards. To this end, encryption should be encouraged and the avoidance of gender, social, geographical or age divides should be mainstreamed into every action.
Amendment 134 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10 a) Where public funds are used, it is crucial that maximum value is gained for society and businesses. Therefore, funding should be, whenever possible, contingent on the outputs of funded projects not being subject to any restrictions, under the principle “public funding, public code”.
Amendment 146 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) In particular, the Commission should report on how effectively the objectives of this Decision have been mainstreamed into the planning and development of projects and any problems identified, as well as the progress towards the digital targets, detailing the degree of Union progress in relation to the projected trajectories for each target, the assessment of the efforts necessary to reach each target, including investment gaps in digital capacities and raising awareness about the actions needed to increase digital sovereignty. The report should also include an assessment of the implementation of relevant regulatory proposals as well as of the actions undertaken at Union and Member States level.
Amendment 149 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) On the basis of this analysis the report would include specific recommended policies, measures and actions. When recommending policies, measures or actions in the report, the Commission should take into account the most recent data available, the joint commitments undertaken, the policies and measures defined by Member States as well as progress regarding recommended actions identified in earlier reports and addressed in the course of the annual cooperation. In addition, the Commission should take into account the differences in individual Member States’ potential to contribute to the digital targets, as well as the policies, measures and actions already in place and considered appropriate to achieve the objectives and targets, even if their effects have not yet materialised.
Amendment 154 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) In order to ensure that cooperation between the Commission and the Member States is efficient and effective, Member States should submit to the Commission national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps covering the period up to 2030 (‘national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps’) proposing, where possible and measurable at national level, national trajectories, describing all the instruments adopted, planned or implemented with a view to contributing to the achievement at Union level of the objectives of this Decision and the digital targets and objectives. These national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps should be a crucial tool for the coordination of the policies of the Member States and for ensuring predictability for the market. Member States should take into account relevant sectoral initiatives, both at Union and national level, and ensure consistency with them. During the annual cycle of cooperation, Member States could propose adjustments to their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps to take into account the evolution of the digital transition at Union and national level and to respond, in particular, to the Commission recommended policies, measures and actions.
Amendment 161 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) The cooperative dialogue between the Commission and the Member States should commence with the assessment of their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps and should be based on the data provided and assessment made in the report of the state of the Digital Decade, as well as on the feedback received by relevant stakeholders, including civil society.
Amendment 168 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) In order to ensure transparency and public participation, the Commission should engage with all interested stakeholders. To that end, the Commission should closely cooperate with stakeholders including private and public actors, such as bodies governed by public laws of the educational or health sector, as well as civil society and consult them on measures to accelerate the digital transformation at Union level. The involvement of stakeholders would be important at the level of Member States as well, in particular when adopting their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps and their adjustments.
Amendment 192 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) promote a human-centered, inclusive, secure and open digital environment where digital technologies and services respect and enhance Union principles, rights and values;
Amendment 206 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) reinforce Member States’ collective resilience and bridge the digital divides, whether social, economic, geographical or gender-based, notably by promoting basic and specialised digital skills for all and fostering the development of high- performing digital education and training systems;
Amendment 215 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ensure digital sovereignty notably by a secure and accessible digital infrastructure capable tof processing vast volumes of data that enables other technological developments, supporting the competitiveness of the Union's industry;
Amendment 219 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) promote the deployment and the use of digital capabilities giving access to digital technologies and data on easyon open, accessible and fair terms in order to achieve a high level of digital intensity and innovation in Union’s enterprises, in particular small and medium ones;
Amendment 223 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) ensure access to data, while ensuring protection of security and fundamental rights;
Amendment 225 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) ensure that democratic life, public services and health and care services are accessible online for everyone, in particular disadvantaged groups including persons with disabilities, offering inclusive, efficient and personalised services and tools with high security and privacy standards;
Amendment 229 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) ensure that everyone, in particular disadvantaged groups including persons with disabilities, has easy access to inclusive, efficient and personalised services and tools with high security and privacy standards such as state-of-the-art encryption and free and open source solutions;
Amendment 233 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) ensure that digital infrastructures and technologies become more sustainable and energy- and resource efficient, are used more efficiently and contribute to a sustainable circular and climate-neutral economy and society in line with the European Green Deal;
Amendment 236 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(f a) ensure that robust methodologies for measuring energy and resource efficiency are developed and used;
Amendment 242 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) facilitate convergent conditions for investments in digital transformation throughout the Union, including by strengthening the synergies between the use of Union and national funds, and developing predictable regulatory approachesnd support approaches that also involve the regional and local level;
Amendment 248 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) ensure that all policies and programmes which are relevant to the achievement of the digital targets, are taken into account in a coordinated and coherent way to fully contribute to the twin green and digital transition.
Amendment 261 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘Digital Economy and Society Index (‘DESI’)’ means an annual set of analysis and measurement indicators on the basis of which the Commission monitors the Union’s and Member States’ overall digital performance across several policy and geographic dimensions, including NUTS 2 level and their progress towards the digital targets set out in Article 4 ;
Amendment 276 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
(b) at least 20 million employed information and communications technology (ICT) specialists are employed, with convergence between women and menout a gender divide;
Amendment 282 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) all European households are covered by a Gigabit network, with all populated areas covered by 5Gsustainable high speed networks;
Amendment 286 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
(b) the sustainable and environmentally suitable production of cutting-edge and sustainable semiconductors in the Union is at least 20% of world production in value;
Amendment 287 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
(c) at least 10 000 climate neutral highly secure “edge nodes” are deployed in the Union, distributed in a way that guarantees a significant contribution to achieving energy consumption reduction, contribute to climate goals and offers secure access to data services with low latency (few milliseconds) wherever businesses are located;
Amendment 299 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part
(a) at least 75% of relevant Union enterprises have taken up:
Amendment 301 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
(b) more than 90% of Union Small and Medium Enterprises (‘SME’) reach at least a basic level of digital intensity, while 75% of the Union's support is targeted at regional and local level for small and micro enterprises;
Amendment 306 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
(c) the Union grows the pipeline of its innovative scale ups and improves their access to finance, leading to at least doubling the number of unicornsfacilitates the growth of scale ups, including their access to finance;
Amendment 314 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
(a) 100% online accessible provision of keyof public administrations and public services for Union citizens and businesses;
Amendment 328 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c
(c) at least 8100% of Union citizens usehave acces to a digital identification (ID) solution.
Amendment 332 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
(4 a) Participatory democracy tools are available for 100% of Union citizens, including online consultation tools.
Amendment 339 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
(1) The Commission shall monitor the progress of the Union against each of the objectives and digital targets set out in Articles 2 and 4. To this end, the Commission shall rely upon Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), and for the purpose of this decision, in accordance with Article 25 (2), shall set out in an implementingdelegated act the key performance indicators (‘KPIs’) for each digital target. .
Amendment 342 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
(2) Member States shall provide to the Commission in a timely manner the necessary statistics and data required for the effective monitoring of the digital transition and of the degree of achievement of the digital targets set out in Article 4 and the objectives set out in Article 2. This shall include relevant information on the availability and accessibility of spectrumdetailed information at NUTS 2, regional and local level. Where the relevant statistics from Member States are not yet available, the Commission may use an alternative data collection methodology, such as studies or direct collection of data from the Member States, in consultation with the Member States, in order to ensure that the regional and local level are properly documented. The use of that alternative data collection methodology shall not affect the tasks of Eurostat as laid down in Commission Decision 2012/504/EU47 . _________________ 47 Commission Decision 2012/504/EU of 17 September 2012 on Eurostat (OJ L 251, 18.9.2012, p. 49).
Amendment 346 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
(3) The Commission, in close cooperation with the European Parliament and the Member States, shall define Union-level projected trajectories for the attainment of each of the digital targets, which would serve as basis for the monitoring and the national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps. Where necessary, in light of technical, economic or societal developments, the Commission shall update one or more of these projected trajectories.
Amendment 352 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Amendment 353 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
(3) In the report on the “State of the Digital Decade”, the Commission may recommend policies, measures or actions to be taken by Member States in areas where progress was insufficient to achieve the digital targets set out in Article 4, where the objectives set out in article 2 were not respected or where significant gaps and shortages have been identified based on the results of the report on the “State of the Digital Decade”. Those recommended policies, measures or actions may, in particular, address:
Amendment 354 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) policies, measures and actions at Member State- and regional level and other policies and measures of potential cross- border relevance;
Amendment 359 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) national projected trajectories contributing to relevant digital targets measurable at national leveland regional level and how the objectives are mainstreamed in these trajectories;
Amendment 361 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Amendment 362 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
(4) Member States shall provide a general overview of the investment needed to contribute to the achievement of the objectives and digital targets as set out in their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps, as well as a general description on the sources of that investment, including, where applicable, planned use of Union programmes and instruments. The national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps may include proposals for Multi-Country Projects.
Amendment 368 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
(1) Member States and the Commission shall closely cooperate to identify ways to address deficiencies in areas where progress was insufficient to achieve one or more of the digital targets set out in Article 4, the objectives in Article 2 or where significant gaps and shortages have been identified based on the results of the report on the ”State of the Digital Decade”. This analysis shall take into account, in particular, the different capacities of Member States to contribute to some of the digital targets and the risk that delays on certain of these targets may have a detrimental effect on the achievement of other digital targets.
Amendment 370 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
(3) Within five months from the publication of the report on the “State of the Digital Decade”, the Member States concerned shall submit to the Commission adjustments to their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps consisting of policies, measures and actions they intend to undertake, including, where relevant, proposals for Multi-Country Projects, to foster progress in the areas concerned by the digital targets set out in Article 4 and to fulfillachieve the objectives set out in Article 2. If a Member State considers that no action is required and that its national Digital Decade strategic roadmap does not require updating, it shall provide its reasons in writing.
Amendment 371 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 4
(4) At any point of the annual cooperation, the Commission and one or more Member States may undertake joint commitments, consult with other Member States on policy, measures or actions or establish Multi-Country Projects as provided for in Article 12. The Commission or aA Member State which has proposed a policy, a measure or an action may also request a peer review process to be launched regarding specific aspects of that policy, measure or action, and in particular on its suitability to contribute to achieving a specific digital target. The outcome of the peer review process may be included in the following Report on the “State of the Digital Decade”.
Amendment 382 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
(1) The Commission shall closely cooperate with private and public stakeholders, including social partners and civil society, to collect information and develop recommended policies, measures and actions for the purposes of the implementation of this Decision.
Amendment 385 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
(2) The Member States shall cooperate with private and public stakeholders, including social partners, in line with the national legislation, and civil society when adopting their national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps and their adjustments.
Amendment 387 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
(1) The general objective of the Multi- Country Projects shall be to facilitate the achievement of the digital targets. , while ensuring that the objectives laid down in Article 2 are achieved.
Amendment 388 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
(2) Multi-Country Projects shall aim at one or more of the following specific objectivegoals:
Amendment 390 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) reinforcing the Union’s technology excellence and industrial competitiveness in critical technologies, digital products, services and infrastructures that are essential for economic recovery and prosperity, for citizens’the economic well-being, security and safety of individuals;
Amendment 394 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) contributing to a sustainable digital transformation of society and the economy that benefits all businesses and citizen, all socio- economic groups and individuals across the Union;
Amendment 405 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 5
Article 12 – paragraph 5
(5) The Commission may adopt a recommendation to set up a Multi-Country Project or to invite a Member State to participate in a Multi-Country Project meeting the requirements of paragraphs (1) to (3) , taking into account the progress implementing the national Digital Decade strategic roadmaps and theobjectives, as well as adherence to the Commission’s recommended actions. The Commission and Member States may also undertake to set up, or join, a Multi- Country Project as a joint commitment.
Amendment 408 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 13 – paragraph 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
(3) Other entities, whether public or private, may contribute to Multi-Country Projects where appropriate. Private contributions must not result in restrictions to the availability of the outcomes of the projects for individuals and businesses in the Union.
Amendment 410 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
(3) An EDIC shall have in each Member State the most extensive legal capacity accorded to legal entities under the law of that Member State. It may, in particular, acquire, own and dispose of movable, and immovable and intellectual property, conclude contracts and be a party to legal proceedings.
Amendment 415 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 17 – paragraph 4
Article 17 – paragraph 4
(4) An EDIC may be open to the participation of entities other than Member States, which may include inter alia international organizations and private entities, as specified in the Statutes. If this is the case, Member States shall hold jointly the majority of the voting rights in the assembly of members or enough votes to make any decision, regardless of the amount of contributions from entities other than Member States.
Amendment 419 #
2021/0293(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) rules on the ownership of infrastructure, intellectual property and other assets, as applicableproperty.
Amendment 323 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the placing on the market, putting into service or use of an AI system that deploys subliminal techniques beyond a person’s consciousness in order to materially distort a person’s behaviour in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person, economic, physical or psychological harm;
Amendment 362 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the AI systems pose a risk of harm to the health and safety, a risk to climate or environment or a risk of adverse impact on fundamental rights, that is, in respect of its severity and probability of occurrence, equivalent to or greater than the risk of harm or of adverse impact posed by the high-risk AI systems already referred to in Annex III.
Amendment 366 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. When assessing for the purposes of paragraph 1 whether an AI system poses a risk of harm to the health and safety, a risk to climate or environment or a risk of adverse impact on fundamental rights that is equivalent to or greater than the risk of harm posed by the high-risk AI systems already referred to in Annex III, the Commission shall take into account the following criteria:
Amendment 368 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the extent to which the use of an AI system has already caused harm to the health and safety, to climate or environment or adverse impact on the fundamental rights or has given rise to significant concerns in relation to the materialisation of such harm or adverse impact, as demonstrated by reports or documented allegations submitted to national competent authorities;
Amendment 371 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point g
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) the extent to which the outcome produced with an AI system is easily reversible, whereby outcomes having an adverse impact on the climate, the environment or negatively affecting the ability to achieve energy efficiency targets or the health or safety of persons shall not be considered as easily reversible;
Amendment 396 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. The risk management system shall always identify significant impact on the environment through, inter alia, AI compute-related energy consumption, efficiency in data use, when compared with other, state-of-the-art AI systems or if it may result in significant environmental impacts or greenhouse gas emissions through the way AI is applied.
Amendment 397 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9 a (new)
Amendment 400 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems which make use of techniques involving the training of models with data shall be developed on the basis of training, validation and testing data sets that meet the quality criteria referred to in paragraphs 2 to 5.
Amendment 455 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that they achieve, security by design and by default in the light of their intended purpose, thus reaching an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness, safety and cybersecurity, and perform consistently in those respects throughout their lifecycle.
Amendment 460 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. The levels of accuracy and the relevant accuracy metrics of high-risk AI systems shall be assessed by an independent entity and declared in the accompanying instructions of use. The language used shall be clear, free of misunderstandings or misleading statements.
Amendment 471 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
High risk AI shall be accompanied by security solutions and patches for the lifetime of the embedded product, or in case of the absence of dependence on a specific product, for a time that needs to be stated by the manufacturer and cannot be less then 10 years.
Amendment 484 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Providers of high-risk AI systems shall, upon request by a national competent authority, provide that authority with all the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate the conformity of the high-risk AI system with the requirements set out in Chapter 2 of this Title, in anone or several official Union languages determined by the Member State concerned. Upon a reasoned request from a national competent authority, providers shall also give that authority access to the logs automatically generated by the high- risk AI system, to the extent such logs are under their control by virtue of a contractual arrangement with the user or otherwise by law.
Amendment 517 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
Article 44 – paragraph 1
1. Certificates issued by notified bodies in accordance with Annex VII shall be drawn-up in anone or several official Union languages determined by the Member State in which the notified body is established or in anone or several official Union languages otherwise acceptable to the notified body.
Amendment 561 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 3
Article 53 – paragraph 3
3. The AI regulatory sandboxes shall not affect the supervisory and corrective powers of the competent authorities and can only be implemented in a specified area with approval of the regional or local authorities. Any significant risks to environment, health and safety and fundamental rights identified during the development and testing of such systems shall result in immediate mitigation and, failing that, in the suspension of the development and testing process until such mitigation takes place.
Amendment 566 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 5
Article 53 – paragraph 5
5. Member States’ competent authorities that have established AI regulatory sandboxes shall coordinate their activities and cooperate within the framework of the European Artificial Intelligence Board. They shall submit annual reports to the Board and the Commission on the results from the implementation of those scheme, including goodbest practices, computational energy use and efficiency, lessons learnt and recommendations on their setup and, where relevant, on the application of this Regulation and other Union legislation supervised within the sandbox.
Amendment 641 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
4a. Environmental impact and energy use: (a) AI systems that require a higher frequency of training and re-training of models than 60% of comparable state-of- the-art systems; (b) AI systems that require training or re- training of data quantities that exceed 60% of comparable state-of-the-art systems; (c) AI systems that require the re-training of partial data-sets involved where these exceed 20% of the data globally available to the system; (d) AI systems other than those which make use of techniques involving the training of models that are resource intensive than 60% of the comparable state-of-the-art systems
Amendment 656 #
2021/0106(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point 3
Annex IV – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. Detailed information about the monitoring, functioning and control of the AI system, in particular with regard to: its capabilities and limitations in performance, environmental sustainability and energy efficiency, including the degrees of accuracy for specific persons or groups of persons on which the system is intended to be used and the overall expected level of accuracy in relation to its intended purpose; the foreseeable unintended outcomes and sources of risks to energy grids and policy, climate and environmental protection, health and safety, fundamental rights and discrimination in view of the intended purpose of the AI system; the human oversight measures needed in accordance with Article 14, including the technical measures put in place to facilitate the interpretation of the outputs of AI systems by the users; specifications on input data, as appropriate;
Amendment 34 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The widespread use of internet- enabled mobile devices means that data roaming is of great economic significance. This is relevant for both users and providers of applications and content. In order to stimulate the development of this market, charges for data transport should not impede growth , in particular considering that the deployment of 5Gnext generation, high speed networks and services is expected to grow steadily .
Amendment 38 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital new(14
Recital new(14
new(14) In order to allow for the development of a more efficient, integrated and competitive market for roaming services, there should be no restrictions preventing undertakings from effectively negotiating wholesale access for the purpose of providing roaming services. Ofulfilling their consumer- contracts while providing roaming services. Lowering the quality of service due to commercial barriers is unacceptable, and obstacles to access to such wholesale roaming services, due to differences in negotiating power and in the degree of infrastructure ownership of undertakings, should be removed. To that end, wholesale roaming access agreements should respect the principle of technology neutrality and ensure all operators an equal and fair opportunity to accessing all networks and technologies available and be negotiated in good faith allowing the roaming provider to offer retail roaming services equivalent to the services offered domestically. Mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and resellers of mobile communication services without their own network infrastructure typically provide roaming services based on commercial wholesale roaming agreements with their host mobile network operators in the same Member State. Commercial negotiations, however, may not leave enough margin to MVNOs and resellers for stimulating competition through lower prices. The removal of those obstacles and balancing the negotiation power between MVNOs/resellers and mobile network operators by an access obligation and wholesale caps should facilitate the development of alternative, innovative and Union-wide roaming services and offers for customers. Directive (EU) 2018/1972 does not provide for a solution to this problem via the imposition of obligations on operators with significant market powers.
Amendment 48 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Certain conditions may be included in the reference offers in order to allow mobile network operators to preventaddress permanent roaming or anomalous or abusive use of wholesale roaming access . In particular, where the visited network operator has reasonable grounds for considering that permanent roaming by a significant share of the roaming provider’s customers or anomalous or abusive use of wholesale roaming access is taking place, it should be able to require the roaming provider to provide, in an aggregated manner and in full compliance with Union and national data protection requirements, information allowing the determination of whether a significant share of the roaming provider’s customers is in a situation of permanent roaming or whether there is anomalous or abusive use of wholesale roaming access, such as information on the share of customers with insignificant domestic consumption compared to the roaming consumption. Moreover, termination of wholesale roaming agreements with a view to preventing permanent roaming or anomalous or abusivefraudulent use of wholesale roaming access should be effected only where less stringent measures have failed to address the situation. Such termination should be subject to prior authorisation by the national regulatory authority of the visited network operator, taking the utmost account of the opinion of BEREC where it has been consulted. Less stringent measures could consist of setting higher wholesale charges not exceeding the maximum wholesale charges provided for in this Regulation for volumes exceeding an aggregated volume specified in the agreement. Such higher wholesale charges should be set in advance, or from the moment when the visited network operator has established and informed the home network operator that, based on objective criteria, permanent roaming by a significant share of the roaming provider’s customers or anomalous or abusive use of wholesale roaming access is taking place. Less stringent measures could also consist of a commitment by the home network operator to adopt or revise the fair use policies applicable to its customers in accordance with the detailed rules adopted pursuant to Article 8 of this Regulation , or the possibility for the visited network operator to request that the wholesale roaming agreement be revised. In the interests of transparency, the national regulatory authority should make information concerning requests for authorisation to terminate wholesale roaming agreements available to the public, subject to business confidentiality.
Amendment 59 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Roaming customers should, to the greatest extent possible, be able to use the retail services that they subscribe to and benefit from the same level of quality of service as at home, when roaming in the Union. To that end, roaming providers should take the necessary measures to ensure that regulated retail roaming services are provided under the same conditions as if such services were consumed domestically. In particular, the same quality of service should be offered to customers when roaming, if technically feasible. Throttling consumer experience has been in the past employed in order to nudge consumers into higher tiers of services, therefore reduction in quality of service for commercial reasons is not acceptable.
Amendment 65 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital new(29
Recital new(29
new(29) RIn exceptional cases roaming providers should be able to apply a ‘fair use policy’ to the consumption of regulated retail roaming services provided at the applicable domestic retail price. The ‘fair use policy’ is intended to prevent abusive or anomalous usage of regulated retail roaming services by permanently roaming customers, such as the use of such services by roaming customers in a Member State other than that of their domestic provider for purposes other than periodic travel. Roaming providers should, in cases of force majeure caused by circumstances such as pandemics or natural catastrophes which involuntarily extend the period of temporary stay of the roaming customer in another Member State, consider extending the applicable fair use allowance for an appropriate period, upon a justified request by the roaming customer . Any fair use policy should enable the roaming provider’s customers to consume volumes of regulated retail roaming services at the applicable domestic retail price that are consistent with their respective tariff plans and shall not be used to artificially limit the freedoms that citizens and business are entitled in the European Union.
Amendment 71 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Roaming customers and home operators sometimes unwittingly incur large bills as a result of the lack of transparency on the numbers used for value added services across the Union and on the wholesale prices charged for value added services. Communications to certain numbers which are used for providing value added services, for example, premium-rate numbers, freephone numbers or shared cost numbers, are subject to particular pricing conditions at the national level. This Regulation should not apply to the part of the tariff that is charged for the provision of value added services but only to the tariffs for the connection to such services. Neverthelss, the RLAH principle might create an expectation for end-users that cCommunications to such numbers while roaming should not incur any increased cost in comparison to the domestic situation. However, this is not always the case when roaming. End-users are confronted with increased costs, even when they call numbers that are free when called domestically. This could erode customers’ confidence in using their phones when roaming and could result in bill shocks, thus having a negative impact on a genuine RLAH experience. This is mainly caused, at retail level by the insufficient level of transparency on the higher charges which can be incurred because of communications to value added services numbers. Therefore measures should be introduced to increase the transparency on the conditions for communications to value added services numbers and ensure similar experience like at home. To that end, roaming customers should be informed in their contract and notified and warned, in a timely manner and free of charge, that some communications to value added services numbers in roaming can entail additional charges, while for specific numbers, like helplines, this charges should not exist.
Amendment 77 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 43
Recital 43
(43) In order to improve the transparency of retail prices for roaming services and to help roaming customers make decisions on the use of their mobile devices while abroad, providers of mobile communication services should supply their roaming customers with information free of charge on the roaming charges applicable to them when using roaming services in a visited Member State. For the purpose of this regulation the use of non- terrestrial networks onboard aircrafts or marine vessels should be assimilated to roaming in terrestrial networks and the information requirements as well as tariff regulations and quality of service should be equally applicable. Since certain customer groups might be well informed about roaming charges, roaming providers should provide a possibility to easily opt- out from this automatic message service. In addition, roaming customers should be provided with a text message including a link to a web page giving detailed information about the types of services (calls and SMS) that may be subject to increased costs. Moreover, providers should actively give their customers, provided that the latter are located in the Union, on request and free of charge, additional information on the per- minute, per-SMS or per-megabyte data charges (including VAT) for the making or receiving of voice calls and also for the sending and receiving of SMS, MMS and other data communication services in the visited Member State.
Amendment 87 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 56
Recital 56
(56) While ensuring business confidentiality and in order to monitor and supervise the application of this Regulation and developments in wholesale roaming markets, national regulatory authorities should be entitled to require information on wholesale roaming agreements that do not provide for the application of the maximum wholesale roaming charges. Those authorities should also be allowed to require information on the adoption and application of conditions in wholesale roaming agreements aiming to preventaddress permanent roaming and any anomalous or abusive use of wholesale roaming access for purposes other than the provision of regulated roaming services to roaming providers’ customers travelling within the Union.
Amendment 95 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 60
Recital 60
(60) In order to assess competitive developments in Union-wide roaming markets and to report regularly on changes in actual wholesale roaming charges for unbalanced traffic between providers of roaming services, BEREC should collect data from national regulatory authorities on the actual charges applied for balanced and unbalanced traffic respectively. BEREC should also collect data on cases where parties to a wholesale roaming agreement have opted out from the application of maximum wholesale roaming charges or have implemented measures at wholesale level that aim to preventaddress permanent roaming or anomalous or abusive use of wholesale roaming access for purposes other than the provision of regulated roaming services to roaming providers’ customers while the latter are periodically travelling within the Union. On the basis of the data collected with sufficient level of granularity , BEREC should report regularly on the relationship between retail prices, wholesale charges and wholesale costs for roaming services. BEREC should also collect the necessary data to allow the monitoring of the elements to be assessed under Article 21(1) of this Regulation.
Amendment 100 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 63
Recital 63
(63) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely to provide for a common approach for ensuring that users of public mobile communications networks, when travelling within the Union, do not pay excessive prices for Union-wide roaming services in comparison with competitive national prices, while increasing transparency and ensuring sustainability of the provision of retail roaming services at domestic prices as well as a genuine RLAH experience in terms of quality of service and access to emergency services while roaming, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Amendment 105 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) ‘visited network’ means a terrestrial public mobile communications network situated in a Member State other than that of the roaming customer’s domestic provider that permits a roaming customer to make or receive calls, to send or receive SMS messages or to use packet switched data communications, by means of arrangements with the home network operator;
Amendment 119 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
That reference offer may include conditions to prevent permanent roaming or anomalous or abusive use of wholesale roaming access for purposes other than the provision of regulated roaming services to roaming providers’ customers while the latter are periodically travelling within the Union. Where specified in a reference offer, such conditions shall include the specific measures that the visited network operator may take to preventaddress permanent roaming or anomalous or abusive use of wholesale roaming access as well as the objective criteria on the basis of which such measures may be taken. Such criteria may refer to aggregate roaming traffic information. They shall not refer to specific information relating to individual traffic of the roaming provider’s customers.
Amendment 128 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Roaming providers shall ensure, when technically feasible, that regulated retail roaming services are provided under the same conditions as if such services were consumed domestically, in particular in terms of quality of service. Commercial practices that result in lowering the quality of service for consumers are forbidden.
Amendment 137 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
Amendment 140 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. RIn exceptional cases, roaming providers may apply in accordance with this Article and the implementing acts referred to in Article 8 a ‘fair use policy’ to the consumption of regulated retail roaming services provided at the applicable domestic retail price level, in order to preventaddress abusive or anomalous usage of regulated retail roaming services by permanent roaming customers, such as the use of such services by roaming customers in a Member State other than that of their domestic provider for purposes other than periodic travel.
Amendment 146 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. In order to ensure consistent application of Articles 6 and 7, the Commission shall, after having consulted BEREC, adopt and periodically review in the light of market developments implementing acts laying down detailed rules on the application of fair use policy and on the methodology for assessing the sustainability of the provision of retail roaming services at domestic prices and on the application to be submitted by a roaming provider for the purposes of that assessment. Those implementing acts shall be adopted with the objective to limit the application of fair use policies in the Union leading to a progressive phase-out of their application. These implementing acts shall be in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 4(2).
Amendment 149 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point -a (new)
(-a) the exceptional character of fair use provisions with a view of eliminating costs that do not stem from competitive behaviour;
Amendment 151 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the professional and leisure travelling patterns in the Union;
Amendment 152 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(d a) a path towards phasing out fair use mechanisms.
Amendment 160 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The average wholesale charge that the visited network operator may levy on the roaming provider for the provision of a regulated roaming call originating on that visited network, inclusive, among others, of origination, transit and termination costs, shall not exceed a safeguard limit of EUR 0,02072 per minute. That maximum wholesale charge shall decrease to EUR 0,019053 per minute oin 1 January2023 and to EUR 0,0026 per minute in 20254, and shall, without prejudice to Articles 21, 22 and 23, remain at EUR 0,019026 per minute until 30 June 2032 .
Amendment 161 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. The wholesale caps for voice should follow the same gliding path provided for in the single Union-wide mobile voice termination rates set for the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 in accordance with Article 75 (1) of Directive (EU) 2018/1972.
Amendment 162 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The average wholesale charge that the visited network operator may levy on the roaming provider for the provision of a regulated roaming SMS message originating on that visited network shall not exceed a safeguard limit of EUR 0,0043 per SMS message . That maximum wholesale charge shall decrease to EUR 0,003 per SMS message on 1 January 2025, and shall, without prejudice to Articles 21, 22 and 23 , remain at EUR 0,003 until 30 June 2032 .
Amendment 168 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The average wholesale charge that the visited network operator may levy on the roaming provider for the provision of regulated data roaming services by means of that visited network shall not exceed a safeguard limit of EUR 2,00 per gigabyte of data transmitted of EUR 0,75/GB until 31st December 2022. That maximum wholesale charge shall decrease to EUR 10,50 per gigabyte of data transmitted on 1 January/GB until 31st December 2023, EUR 0,25/GB until 31st December 20254 and shall, without prejudice to Articles 21, 22 and 23 remain at EUR 1,500,25 per gigabyte of data transmitted until 30 June1st December 20326 .
Amendment 172 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Without prejudice to Articles 10, 11 and 12, the visited network operator shall not levy on the roaming provider any charge related to the emergency communications initiated by the roaming customer and the transmission of caller location information. By extension visited network operator shall also not levy on the roaming provider any charge related other non- emergency crucial communications initiated by the roaming customer such as free of charge local helplines and accessibility relay services for persons with disabilities.
Amendment 176 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Roaming providers shall, except when the roaming customer has notified the roaming provider that he does not require this service, provide the customer, automatically by means of a Message Service, without undue delay and free of charge, when the roaming customer enters a Member State other than that of his domestic provider, with information on the potential risk of increased charges due to the use of value added services including a link to a dedicated webpage providing information about the types of services that may be subject to increased costs and, if available, information on value added services number ranges. Roaming providers shall also ensure that the use of value added service is provided under the same conditions as if such services were consumed domestically.
Amendment 192 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
Article 15 – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. This Article, with the exception of paragraph 6, the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3, and subject to the second and third subparagraphs of this paragraph, shall also apply to data roaming services used by roaming customers travelling outside the Union and provided by a roaming provider and to using non-terrestrial networks.
Amendment 195 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
An automatic message from the roaming provider shall inform the roaming customer that the latter may access emergency services free of charge by calling the single European emergency number ‘112’ and by alternative means of access to emergency services through emergency communications mandated in the visited Member State. The information shall be delivered to the roaming customer’s mobile device by an SMS message, and via all the appropriate means established in the Directive 2018/1972, in order to ensure that end-users with disabilities can access emergency services on an equivalent basis with others, every time the roaming customer enters a Member State other than that of his domestic provider. It shall be provided free of charge at the moment the roaming customer initiates a roaming service, by an appropriate means adapted to facilitate its receipt and easy comprehension.
Amendment 200 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
BEREC shall establish and maintain a single Union-wide database of value added services numbering ranges in each Member State to be made accessible for national regulatory authorities and operators and shall create the necessary conditions for roaming providers to ensure that the use of value added service is provided under the same prices as if such services were consumed domestically. BEREC shall ensure adequate means of access to emergency services to customers, in particular to people with disabilities in the modalities set in Directive 2018/1972. The database shall be established by 31 December 2023. To that end, the NRA or other competent authorities shall, by electronic means, provide the necessary information and the relevant updates to BEREC without undue delay.
Amendment 212 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – introductory part
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – introductory part
new1. The Commission shall , after consulting BEREC, submit twobiennial reports to the European Parliament and to the Council. Where necessary, after submitting each report, the Commission shall adopt a delegated act pursuant to Article 22 amending the maximum wholesale chargesthe Commission shall propose a new legislative proposal for regulated roaming services as laid down in this Regulation. The first such report shall be submitted by 30 June 2025 and the second by 30 June15 December 2023, with a view of updating the legislative framework by 31st December 2029 5.
Amendment 222 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – subparagraph 1 – point i
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – subparagraph 1 – point i
(i) the impact of the applicdeadline for elimination of fair use policies by operators in accordance with Article 8, including the identification of any inconsistencies in the application and implementation of such fair use policies;
Amendment 224 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – subparagraph 1 – point i a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – subparagraph 1 – point i a (new)
(i a) the impact of the obligation to ensure the highest quality of service available when travelling;
Amendment 226 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – subparagraph 1 – point j
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – subparagraph 1 – point j
(j) the extent to which roaming customers and operators face problems in relation to value added services and inadvertent roaming;
Amendment 227 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – subparagraph 1 – point j a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph new1 – subparagraph 1 – point j a (new)
(j a) the impact on equal access to electronic communications by persons with disabilities when travelling within EU/EEA.
Amendment 240 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22
Article 22
Amendment 245 #
2021/0045(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23
Article 23
Amendment 4 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
— having regard to the Joint communication to the European Parliament and the Council on a strategic Partnership with the Gulf; having regard to the EU Council conclusions from 20 June 2022,
Amendment 6 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 b (new)
Citation 8 b (new)
— having regard to the UN Sustainable Development Goals,
Amendment 8 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 c (new)
Citation 8 c (new)
— having regard to European Parliament resolution of 23 October 2020 on Gender Equality in EU’s foreign and security policy,
Amendment 24 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas Yemen is in the midst of a protracted political, humanitarian and developmental crisis; whereas 80 per cent of the population, 24.1 million people, are in need of humanitarian aid and protection; whereas the war in Yemen is now the largest humanitarian crisis in the world; whereas in 2015 Saudi Arabia led a military coalition to intervene in the Yemen war to support former president Hadi against the Houthi movement sponsored by Iran; whereas following the 2 April 2022 truce between the warring parties, civilian casualties fell to the lowest level in month;
Amendment 31 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the US continues to play a relevant role in the region, including through a direct military presence; whereas Israel, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan and Egypt all have major non-NATO ally status; whereas Russia has emerged as a military actor in the region following its 2015 intervention in the Syrian war to perpetuate the Assad regime;
Amendment 36 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
C a. whereas on 15 September 2020, Israel and the UAE, as well as Bahrain, agreed to normalise their relations by signing the so-called Abraham Accords;
Amendment 39 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the summit of 27 to 28 March 2022 between Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Egypt and Morocco aiming to create a security alliance, which was also attended by the US Secretary of State, paved the way for a new regional approach to security and confirmed the countries’ intention to divide the region into blocks; whereas Iran since 2011 has significantly expanded its influence in the region, including via proxy forces in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen;
Amendment 49 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas at the 2021 Al-Ula summit Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt and Bahrain ended its boycott of Qatar after nearly four years; whereas in 2021 talks between Saudi-Arabia and Iran and high-level dialogues between Iran and the United Arab Emirates have contributed to de-escalation in the region;
Amendment 51 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas both Ukraine and Russia are leading exporters of agricultural products to many countries of the region; whereas disruptions related to the war are exacerbating already-rising food prices and deepening poverty;
Amendment 68 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
F a. whereas the broader Middle East is among the most affected by climate change worldwide with temperatures rising twice as fast as global average; whereas the region’s countries face a multitude of environmental challenges, such as desertification, biodiversity loss, pollution in marine and coastal areas, air pollution, and water scarcity and quality which will be exacerbated by climate change; whereas the frequency and intensity of sand storms is steadily increasing in the region; whereas climate- induced water shortages, desertification and food insecurity threaten human security and may aggravate existing- or trigger new conflicts in the region;
Amendment 70 #
2020/2113(INI)
F b. whereas in October 2021 the United Arab Emirates pledged net-zero emissions by 2050, Saudi Arabia pledged to achieve net-zero emissions domestically by 2060 and Qatar pledged achieving a 25% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030;
Amendment 71 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F c (new)
Recital F c (new)
F c. whereas the European Green Deal can create channels for constructive cooperation between the EU and countries in the region; whereas the EU will have to import renewable energy to meet its climate targets; whereas in the context of global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and divestment from fossil fuels the countries of the broader Middle East need to diversify their economies that strongly rely on the extraction and trade of hydrocarbons;
Amendment 84 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas in many countries of the region the death penalty is applied; whereas according to Amnesty International in 2021 520 executions were recorded in seven countries, Egypt, Iran Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates and Yemen, constituting an 19% increase in comparison to 2020;
Amendment 87 #
2020/2113(INI)
H b. whereas the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) continues to contribute to regional stability and peace in a region affected by conflicts; whereas underfunding recurrently jeopardizes its work which is yet key for the human development and humanitarian support of some of the world’s most vulnerable refugees, whose needs continue to grow;
Amendment 92 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
I a. whereas across the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), in recent years there has been significant focus to increase women representation in the workforce as well as in municipalities or parliaments;
Amendment 95 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
J a. whereas problems associated with governance and breaches of the rule of law in the region are a significant source of instability; whereas deeply rooted corruption adversely impact employment, growth and development and compromise states’ ability to fulfil their obligation to promote, respect and protect the human rights of individuals within their jurisdictions; whereas the worlds’ highest levels of youth unemployment and the imprisonment or torture of political opposition figures and social activists across the region fuel tension and conflict;
Amendment 98 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Recital J b (new)
J b. whereas the Arab Gulf countries have become leading international humanitarian and development aid donors;
Amendment 108 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the EU has its own interests in the region, asnamely promoting peace and stability and de-escalation of tensions in the broader region, fighting climate change and cooperating on the production of clean energy, promoting and implementing multilateralism, promoting the respect for human rights, the rule of law and good governance, increasing prosperity, meeting growing global development and humanitarian needs, ensuring global health; stresses that EU security is interdependent with security in the Middle East; highlights that EU funding instruments directed at the region make an important contribution to stability and prosperity;
Amendment 120 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the region is becoming increasingly polarised into blocks; considers this counterproductive for the EU’s goals in the area of stability and security; calls on the EU to foster multilateralism and regional integration in the broader Middle East through the EU-GCC inter-institutional partnership and the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, including strong inter-parliamentary relations; encourages the EU in parallel to enhance its bilateral discussions with all the different stakeholders;
Amendment 130 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the important role the EU could play in facilitating dialogue between regional stakeholders, which is key to fostering stability; calls, therefore, for cooperation with the regional supranational organisations, such as the GCC and the Arab League to be enhanced;
Amendment 133 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the European Commission’s and the European External Actions Service’s Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on a Strategic Partnership with the Gulf; considers the communication an important step to acknowledge the Arab Gulf countries´ role in the region and put inter-regional relations between the EU and the Gulf on a new footing; commends the central role of cooperation in the green transition, however, misses a more critical engagement vis-a-vis the poor human rights record and problematic foreign and security policy of the countries concerned; invites the EU and its Member States to stress that a closer partnership with Gulf countries should be linked to clear human rights benchmarks for progress in the GCC, including on accountability for war crimes in Yemen, women’s rights, freedom of expression and association, release of human rights defenders, moratorium on the death penalty, rights of migrant workers, and alignment in international fora;
Amendment 139 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. Reiterates the longstanding EU commitment reaffirmed at the UN Security Council in January 2022 for a just and comprehensive resolution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, based on the two state solution, with the State of Israel and an independent, democratic, sovereign and viable State of Palestine, living side by side in peace and security and mutual recognition, and with Jerusalem serving as the future capital of both states; acknowledges the normalisation of relations between the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan on the one hand and Israel on the other hand; stresses that while the normalisation agreements have formalised and increased cooperation, especially between the UAE and Israel, the accords have hitherto not contributed to the settlement of long-lasting conflict between Israelis and Palestinians; calls on the European Commission and the Council to revive its engagement for the two state solutions and discourage activities that undermine it, such as the continuation of settlement construction, mass evictions and property demolitions of Palestinians in East Jerusalem and the West Bank; calls on the Commission and the Council to explore with the respective Arab countries how their normalisation agreements with Israel can be conducive to the two state solution;
Amendment 143 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Amendment 148 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4 d. Recalls that the Syrian civil war is one of the region’s most deadly conflict in decades causing the death of half a million people and forcibly displacing 14 million Syrians; reiterates the European Parliament’s position rejecting any role for President Bashar al-Assad in post- conflict Syria with reference to UN Security Council Resolution 2254 (2015); welcomes the European Union’s financial support to Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan for hosting Syrian refugees; welcomes all efforts by the EU, its Member States and civil society to document and prosecute crimes against humanity by al-Assad and his associates and calls on the European Union to intensify efforts to end impunity;
Amendment 151 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 e (new)
Paragraph 4 e (new)
Amendment 163 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to align their arms export policies with the provisions of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP and to adopt a strict application of all criteria; calls for a consultation mechanism to be put in place among Member States to assess compliance with the Common Position;
Amendment 168 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Condemns in the strongest terms the ongoing violence in Yemen since 2015; recalls that there can be no military solution to the conflict in Yemen and that the crisis can only be resolved sustainably through an inclusive Yemeni-led and Yemeni-owned negotiation process involving all quarters of Yemeni society and all parties to the conflict; welcomes the UN-brokered truce from April 2022 and its renewal from June 2022; calls on all parties to respect the truce and to engage in good faith negotiations leading to viable political and security arrangements, in line with by UN Security Council resolution 2216 (2015), the Joint implementation mechanisms of the United Nations Mission to Support the Hodeidah Agreement and the global ceasefire, as called for by UN Security Council resolution 2532 (2020); urges EU and Member States to commit to re-establish accountability measures and redress for victims of international human rights and international humanitarian laws violations in Yemen, including notably the re-establishment of a UN monitoring and reporting mechanism; reiterates its call for an EU-wide ban on the export, sale, update or maintenance of arms or other security equipment to all members of the Saudi-led coalition, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE, given the serious risk of violations of international humanitarian law or humanitarian law;
Amendment 170 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Expresses concern about the situation in Iraq and underlines the deep popular frustration in the country vis-a- vis the political elite as well as persistent corruption; encourages the European Union and its Member States to contribute to stability in Iraq by supporting post-conflict re-construction and conciliation as well as accountable institution-building in order to shield the country from geopolitical rivalries and to bridge widening social cleavages; underlines that destruction of cultural heritage as well as looting of works of art and other cultural goods during armed conflicts needs to be addressed in terms of both reconstruction and restitution in order to protect and ensure the integrity of the cultural heritage and identity of societies, communities, groups and individuals;
Amendment 171 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Underlines the EU’s contribution to regional de-escalation and maritime safety in the Persian Gulf through the European Maritime Awareness in the Strait of Hormuz (EMASOH) surveillance mission;
Amendment 177 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the countries in the region to refrain from exporting arms or combatants or intervening militarily in other countries, as such interventions are some of the main causes of regional destabilisation as they undermine state structures and spon-sor a pool of fighters with different ideo-logical orientations; firmly opposes the use of drones in extrajudicial and extraterritorial killings of terror suspects and demands a ban on the use of drones for this purpose;
Amendment 186 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Holds the view that the more the policies and priorities of EU Member States vis-a-vis the broader Middle East region diverge, the less influence they can exert; calls on all European Member States to avoid being dragged into regional rivalries and refrain from engaging in one-sided partisanship with conflicting parties in the region; urges EU Member States to stop fuelling armed conflicts and halt arms exports to countries involved in armed conflict;
Amendment 205 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the negotiations on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action as a necessary step towards achieving regional stability; calls on the US and Iran to pursue meaningful negotiations with a view to returning to compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action; calls on the EU to consider setting up dialogues with the Arab Gulf countries and Israel that accom-pany the negotiations on a nuclear agreement with Iran with the aim of pro-moting regional understanding and re-ducing perceived threat;
Amendment 210 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Acknowledges the remarkable mediation efforts of countries like Oman, Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar to solve regional conflicts and disputes; calls on the European Union wherever possible to support these diplomatic tracks and to encourage regional ownership and responsibility for de-escalating tensions;
Amendment 211 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Calls on the European Union and EU Member States to incorporate UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security in all its conflict resolution efforts in the broader Middle East; asks the European Union and EU Member states to call on their interlocutors in the region to increase the participation of women in the prevention and resolution of conflicts, peace negotiations, peace-building, peacekeeping, humanitarian response and in post-conflict reconstruction; asks the EU in this regard to lead by example and ensure fair representation of women in their own EU delegations and missions; reiterates its calls for full implementation and prioritisation of Gender Action Plan III (GAP III) in every aspect of EU external action through a gender- transformative and intersectional approach as well as gender mainstreaming in all areas of external action and to address the root causes of gender inequalities; calls on the European Union and its Member States to urge all parties to conflict in the region to take special measures to protect women and girls from gender-based violence, particularly rape and other forms of sexual abuse, in situations of armed conflict;
Amendment 214 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines the need to diversify the EU’s sources of energy and calls for Calls on the European Union not to merely substitute its gas and oil imports from Russia with hydrocarbon supply from the broader Middle East but to seize the opportunity of cutting reliance on Russian gassessment of the security implications of any agree by two-thirds before 2022 to decrease the EUʼs over-all reliance on fossil fuels and boost investment into import oil, gas or hydrogen into the EUenergy generation from renewable sources as well as electricity interconnection;
Amendment 220 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Calls on the European Union to increase its engagement with the countries of the broader Middle East on the European Green Deal; calls on the European Union to encourage and support the regionʼs countries in achieving their climate targets, especially by capitalizing on their large renewable energy capacity; considers the regionʼs reliance on the extraction and trade of hydrocarbon a threat to their future stability; calls on the European Union to stress the mutual benefits of cooperation in the green transition, notably the advantages of sustainable growth, vis-a- vis their interlocutors in the region; invites the European Union to consider setting up a renewable energy partnership with the countries of the broader Middle East; holds that electricity interconnection and renewable hydrogen are the two most promising fields of clean energy cooperation between the sides.
Amendment 227 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Welcomes the proposal by the Joint Communication on a Strategic Partnership with the Gulf to step up the EU´s engagement with the Gulf countries on funding of international humanitarian and development aid; calls on the European Commission to encourage Gulf donors to channel more of their humanitarian and development aid through multilateral institutions as their aid is mainly bilateral and only 1-6% of aid goes to multilateral institutions; recommends the European Commission to offer the respective countries assistance in reconsidering their aid objectives as well as enhancing cooperation and coordination among them as well as between them and the EU;
Amendment 237 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights that people-to-people contacts and cooperation in fields such as education, science or culture play an important role in the region and can make a key contribution to regional stability and the bridging of divides both with the EU and among the different states; calls on the European Commission to facilitate the access of students from the region to the Erasmus programme;
Amendment 243 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. condemns that throughout the region, human rights defenders, activists, journalists and perceived critics continue to suffer severe and pervasive state repression; calls on EU and Member States’ delegations on the ground to prioritize human rights issues in their interaction with local authorities and ensure full and scrupulous implementation of all EU guidelines, including the Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders, and the action plan on human rights and democracy;
Amendment 253 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Stresses the specific threat that the new digital technologies pose for human rights defenders, opposition figures, journalists and others in controlling, restricting and undermining their activities, as illustrated by the Pegasus revelations; calls on the EU to take an initiative to promote an immediate, global moratorium on the sale, transfer and use of spyware technology until the adoption of a robust regulatory framework in this field; calls on the EU and Member States to ensure full due human rights diligence and proper vetting of any future exports of European surveillance technology and related technical assistance; calls on the EU and Member States to engage with third country governments to end repressive cybersecurity and counter- terrorism legislation practices and legislation;
Amendment 257 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14 b. Deplores that leaders in the region have responded with authoritarian restoration to wide spread street protests calling for democratic reforms in numerous Arab countries in 2010/2011 and again as of 2018, further restricting freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of assembly and freedom of press of citizens and residents; stresses that rule of law and human rights, good governance and anti- corruption bring benefits to people and foster stability in the region;
Amendment 261 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the EU to promote the development of a strong civil society in the region, particularly social, labour or environmental organisations as well as womenʼs or religious associations; notes that the EU has an interest in engaging with local civil society organisations to better inform and diversify its policies towards the countries of the region; highlights that the shrinking civil space in several countries poses a threat to regional stability;
Amendment 263 #
2020/2113(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Welcomes the holding of bilateral human rights dialogues with Arab Gulf countries as well as Israel, Jordan and Lebanon; stresses, however, that such dialogues should not be box-ticking exercises and should instead aim at securing concrete commitments and deliverables for specific human rights progress in partner countries; further emphasizes that yearly human rights dialogues should not be the only opportunity for human rights talks with the respective countries and urges EU and member states’ leaders to echo concerns and formulate recommendations expressed in the dialogues during all high level interactions with their counterparts;
Amendment 12 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) On 5 October 2016, the Union ratified the 2018 Paris Agreement28 adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change28 and it entered into force on 4 November 2016. This international agreement invites parties who have ratified it to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change limiting globalholding the increase in the global average temperature rise to well below 2 degrees. _________________ 28 Multilateral Treaty, Chapter XXVII Environment, 7.d Paris Agreement. Entered into force on 4 November 2016 and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels28a. _________________ 28 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 1. 28a Article 2.1.a of the Paris Agreement.
Amendment 14 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) In line with the Paris Agreement, oOn 11 December 2019 the European Commission published its communication on ‘The European Green Deal’ committing the Commission to ‘tackle climate and environmental- related challenges’ and ‘to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy where there are no net emissions of greenhouse gases in 2050 and where economic growth is decoupled from resource use’29 . The European Green Deal Communication, which sets out a new growth strategy, announces the need to support clean steel breakthrough technologies leading to a zero carbon steelmaking process by 2030 and to explore whether part of the funding liquidated under the European Coal and Steel Community can be used. The European Green Deal Communication also states that ‘all EU actions and policies should pull together to help the EU achieve a successful and just transition towards a sustainable future’. In line with the ‘do no harm principle’, enshrined in the European Green Deal Communication, the research objectives of the RFCS Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel are being revised, so as to no longer cover activities that perpetuate the extraction, processing and unabated use of coal, including for steel. _________________ 29 COM(2019)640, p. 2.
Amendment 15 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The Union has been pursuing an ambitious policy on climate action and has put in place a regulatory framework to achieve its current 2030 greenhouse gas emission reduction target. In particular, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, adopted before the entry into force of the Paris Agreement. This regulatory framework will be adapted by June 2021 in line with the revised increased 2030 climate target. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council30 sets out the legislative foundation for reliable, inclusive, cost- efficient, transparent and predictable governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action (governance mechanism), which ensures the achievement of the 2030 and long-term objectives and targets of the Energy Union in line with the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. _________________ 30 Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1–77).
Amendment 16 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In addition, the report on the monitoring and assessment of the Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (‘the Research Programme’) recommends to amend the research objectives for coal and steel set out in Sections 3 and 4 of Chapter II of Decision 2008/376/EC and to support breakthrough research in the steel sector as well as emblematic projects in the coal sector.
Amendment 17 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) It is necessary therefore to align the RFCS Research Programme objectives with international agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, as well as with the scientific, technological and political objectives of the Union on climate neutrality by 2050the best available scientific evidence, in particular the findings reported by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), as well as the technological and political objectives of the Union, in particular on climate change and zero greenhouse gas emissions.
Amendment 19 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Co-programmed partnerships have demonstrated to be effective in pooling resources for a common European research objective. In order to help to reach a climate-neutral economy by 2050 at the latest, it is necessary to set out the possibility to provide support via co- programmed European partnerships, in synergy and sequencing with other programmes. A European partnership could be an ideal instrument for pooling resources to support research on breakthrough technologies for the reduction of CO2towards zero- pollution and zero-greenhouse gas emissions in the steel industrial sector.
Amendment 21 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
The Research Programme shall provide support for collaborative research in the coal and steel sectors. The Research Programme shall also provide support for clean steellimit its support to breakthrough technologies leading to near zero- carbon and clean steel making projects andby 2030 and for research projects for managing the just transition of formerly operating coal mines or coal mines in the process of closure and related infrastructure in line with the Just Transition Mechanism and the territorial just transition plans and in compliance with Article 4(2) of Council Decision 2003/76/EC1a. The Research Programme shall be consistent with the political, scientific, climate, environmental and technological objectives of the Union, and shall complement the activities carried out in the Member States and within the existing EU research programmes, in particular the fHorizon Europe – the Framework pProgramme for rResearch, technological development and demonstration activities (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Research Framework Programme’).; and Innovation (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Research Framework Programme’).’ The Research Programme shall in particular be consistent with the Paris Agreement, which sets out a long-term goal to pursue efforts to limit the global temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels; _________________ 1aCouncil Decision 2003/76/EC of 1 February 2003 establishing the measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (OJ L 29, 5.2.2003).
Amendment 27 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
The Research Programme shall support research activities aimed at the objectives set out for coal in Section 3 and for steel in Section of Chapter II.The Research Programme shall refrain from supporting and contributing to: (a) the prolongation of the lifetimes of existing coal mines (e.g. extraction) and existing coal plants; (b) the promotion of underground coal gasification, coalbed methane (CBM) and enhanced CBM, the use of coal to produce hydrogen and steel and the use of coal for other purposes than energetic uses, such as products derived from coal tar, carbon fibre, coal to polymers, graphene, carbon nanotubes and products for agriculture;
Amendment 28 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Research projects shall supportcontribute to the achievement of the Union’s 2030 climate targets and the transition towards a climate-neutral Union economy by 205040 at the latest, with the objective to support the phasing out of fossil fuels, to develop well before that date, and to support the development of alternative activities on former coal mine sites and avoid or restore environmental damage of coal mines in the process of closure, formerly operating coal mines and their surroundings, while respecting the polluter-pays principle. Projects shall in particular focus on:
Amendment 32 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
Amendment 33 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (b)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (b)
(b) use of geothermal energy on former coal sites; development of renewable energy supply services on former coal sites, such as the exploitation of geothermal resources, including energy storage, local heating, cooling, electricity and, where found, sustainable extraction of critical raw materials;
Amendment 37 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (ba) (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (ba) (new)
(b a) conversion of coal heating and cooling infrastructure, such as district heating and cooling networks and industrial processes, to renewable heating and cooling alternatives such as geothermal energy;
Amendment 40 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (c)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (c)
(c) non-energetic uses and the production of raw materials fromonly from already existing mining wastes and residues from formerly operating coal mines or those in the closure processfrom coal mines in the process of closure, duly assessing that their climate, environmental and health impact is minimised and lower than alternative solutions, in full coherence with the circular economy approach aiming for detoxification of resource stream;
Amendment 44 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
(d) repurposing of former coal and lignite mines as well as coal-related infrastructure, including power supply services, in line withmines in line with the polluter-pays principle, a climate-neutral and environmentally- friendly transition;
Amendment 47 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 2 (a) (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 (a) (new)
2 a. The Research Program shall not support projects where the polluter-pays principle applies and where such research is part of the closure/phase out plans of coal mines and of the respective environmental impact assessments, namely projects that envisage the following but not exclusively: (a) mine remediation; (b) perpetual pit water management issues; (c) perpetual polder management, such as water drainage: (d) groundwaters protection measures and purification; (e) constant monitoring of water quality, soil subsidence and other environmental and health indicators; (f) prevention of dust emissions from mining operations.
Amendment 48 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Issues concerning safety in coal mines in the process of closure and formerly operating coal mines with a view to improving working conditions, occupational health and safety, as well as preventing environmental emissues deleterious to healthions and other pollution issues potentially harmful to health or the environment, shall be taken into account in the projects covering the activities referred to in Articles 4 and 6.
Amendment 51 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Research projects shall focus on diseases related to mining activities and its related environmental pressures with the aim of improving the health of people living in coal regions in transition. Research projects shall also ensure protective measures during the closure of mines and in formerly operating mines.;
Amendment 52 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – Title
Article 6 – Title
Amendment 54 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Research projects shall seek to prevent, and where not technically feasible, minimise the impacts of coal mines in the process of closure and of formerly operating mines on the atmosphere, water and soils. Research shall be geared towards preserving and restoring natural resources for future generations and minimising the environmental impact of coal mines in the process of closure and inof formerly operating mines.
Amendment 57 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (a)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (a)
(a) new and improved technologiesiques beyond current ‘state of the art’ (Best Available Techniques - BAT) standards, to avoid environmental pollution, including methane leakage, at local level of coal mines in the process of closure, formerly operating coal mines and their surroundings (inter alia atmosphere, land, soils and water);
Amendment 58 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (b)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (b)
(b) capturing, avoiding and minimising greenhouse gas emissions, in particular methane,avoiding methane emissions from coal depositmines in the process of closure and in formerly operating coal mines;
Amendment 61 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (c)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (c)
(c) managing and re-using mining waste, fly ash and desulphurisation products from coal mines in the process of closure and formerly operating coal mines, accompanied, where relevant, by other forms of wastesolutions that provide better implementation of the EU waste hierarchy compared to current practice which would not lead to a transfer of residues, waste or by products of concern and which can demonstrate a substantial benefit against the circular economy and toxic free environment objectives;
Amendment 63 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (d)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (d)
(d) refurbishing waste heaps and using industrially residues from coal production and consumptionfrom former coal sites in coal regions in transition;
Amendment 64 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (e)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (e)
Amendment 65 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (f)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (f)
(f) restoring the environment of former installations or installations that areoperating coal mines or coal mines in the process of closure that used coal, and their surroundings, notably water, land, soils and biodiversity, while respecting the polluter-pays principle;
Amendment 66 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (g)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (g)
Amendment 68 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (ga) (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point (ga) (new)
(g a) developing a regional concept for diversification of economic activities for local development and the creation of green and quality jobs with an adapted transformation of the employment structure and skills adjustment.
Amendment 70 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Research and technological development (RTD) shall aim to develop, demonstrate and improve near zero-carbon steel production processes with a view to raising product quality, and increasing productivity. Substantially reducing emissions, energy consumption, the carbon footprintvoiding emissions, substantially reducing energy and material consumption and other environmental impacts as well as conserving resources, shall form an integral part of the activities sought. Research projects shall address one or more of the following areas:
Amendment 72 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
(a) new and improved breakthrough near zero-carbon iron- and steel-making processes and operations, with particular attention to carbon direct avoidance and/or smart carbon usage, in particular iron- and steelmaking based on hydrogen made from renewable energy sources, and the direct electrification from renewable energy sources of steel production;
Amendment 77 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point (c)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point (c)
(c) steel process integration and process efficiency in near zero-carbon steel production;
Amendment 78 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
Amendment 79 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point (e)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point (e)
(e) techniques for increasing recyclability, recycling and re-use of steel , in particular: improved waste management, upcycling, reverse logistics, processes to decontaminate scrap steel and developing a circular economy;
Amendment 80 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 8 – paragraph 1– point (g)
Article 8 – paragraph 1– point (g)
(g) innovative technologies and solutions for the iron- and steel making processes promofacilitating cross-sectoral activities, synergies, industrial clustering and symbiosis, to enable increased circularity and create or maintain zero- carbon value chains as well as demonstration projects integrating both zero-carbon energyand renewable energy systems and production, or projects contributing to a clean hydrogen economy.renewable based economy, including hydrogen made from renewable energy sources;
Amendment 83 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
RTD shall focus on meeting the requirements of steel users to develop new near zero-carbon products and on creating new market opportunities while reducavoiding emissions and limiting environmental impacts. In the context of the technologies referred to in Article 8, research projects shall address one or more of the following areas, with the objective to deliver near zero- carbon steel production processes in the Union:
Amendment 84 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
(a) new advanced zero-carbon primary or recycled steel grades;
Amendment 85 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (b)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (b)
(b) improvement of steel properties such as mechanical and physical properties, suitability for further processing, suitability for various applications and various working conditions, with special attention to recycled steel;
Amendment 86 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (c)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (c)
(c) prolonging service life, enabling design for circularity, including modularity, and material efficiency, in particular by improving the resistance of steels, steel structures to heat and corrosion, mechanical and thermal fatigue and/or other deteriorating effects;
Amendment 87 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (e)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (e)
Amendment 88 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (f)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point (f)
Amendment 89 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 9 – paragraph 1 –point (g)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 –point (g)
(g) zero emission and high- performance steels for application, in particular light- weight steel for applications in growing sectors like e-mobility and offshore wind, including sustainability, eco-design methods, retrofitting, lightweight design and/or safety solutions.;
Amendment 91 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
(a) techniques for recycling and upcycling of obsolete steel and by-product from various sources and improvement of the quality of steel scrap, with special attention to avoiding downgrading of steel quality due to contamination with other metals (e.g. copper);
Amendment 93 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
(d) design of steel grades and assembled structures to facilitate the easy recovery of steel for recycling or re-useimproved scrap handling and disassembly at end-of- life, to enable the easy recovery, re-use and recycling of steel and other materials;
Amendment 94 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Amendment 95 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (f)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (f)
Amendment 96 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (fa) new
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (fa) new
(f a) improvement of design and/or treatment of waste for an increased recovery and reuse of critical raw materials in steel alloys;
Amendment 97 #
2020/0141(NLE)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Decision 2008/376/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (fb) (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point (fb) (new)
(f b) applications of distributed ledger technologies to enable cradle to cradle tracking and enable reverse logistics of steel products.
Amendment 130 #
2019/2178(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Considers that the environmental and economic sustainability of the fisheries sector requires the decarbonisation of the fishing fleet, which in turn will result in a reduction in current fuel spending thereby positively impacting the profitability of activities; therefore calls on the Commission to facilitate the conditions for the acquisition of new vessels operating alternative propulsion systems by using public funds, without which said decarbonisation will be unaffordable for the sector itself.
Amendment 623 #
2019/2176(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Regrets that, rather than calling for an end to the violence and for a resumption of peaceful negotiations supporting the efforts of the Co-Chairs of the Minsk Group of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group, Turkey instead decided to unconditionally sustain the military actions of one of the sides in the recent conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh through its direct engagement and transfer of foreign fighters in support of Azerbaijan; calls on Turkey to refrain from any further military interference in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict;
Amendment 10 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Subheading 1
Budget 2020: bridge to the future Europe – Investing in citizens, innovation and securitya sustainable environment
Amendment 13 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the 2020 Union budget is the bridge to the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the period 2021-2027 and should contribute to creating a common, long-term vision on the future political priorities of the Union; expects that, at the time of adoption of the 2020 budget, the Council and Parliament will be engaged in fully-fledged MFF negotiations, following a political agreement in the European Council; believes that a strong, responsible and forward-looking 2020 budget will facilitate an agreement and the transition towards the next MFF, and that to reach it, no taboo should prevail on the full use of all flexibilities and all possibilities available under the current MFF regulation and the Financial Regulation;
Amendment 24 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that, 2020 being the last year of the current MFF, the implementation of EU programmes, including those under shared management in cohesion policy, Common Agricultural Policy (second pillar) and European Maritime and Fisheries Fund will be further accelerated and reach its closing phase, which will be reflected in a substantial increase in payment requests; anticipates, therefore, a peak in the annual level of payment appropriations for 2020 and is determined to secure the necessary payments in 2020 and to prevent another payment crisis in the first years of the 2021-2027 MFF, as was the case during the current period;
Amendment 25 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that, 2020 being the last year of the current MFF, the implementation of EU programmes, including those under shared management in cohesion policy, will be further accelerated and reach its closing phase, which will be reflected in a substantial increase in payment requests; anticipates, therefore, a peak in the annual level of payment appropriations for 2020 and is determined to secure the necessary payments in 2020, to continuously improve the control and correction mechanisms, and to prevent another payment crisis in the first years of the 2021-2027 MFF, as was the case during the current period;
Amendment 45 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers the protection of the EU’s external borders with the support of a strengthened European Border and Coast Guard to be an inseparable condition for a European Union without internal borders, the proper functioning of the Schengen area and freedom of movement within the EU; considers it to be an obligation to ensure adequate funding, staffing and training of staff for all agencies operating in the field of security, including for the protection of fundamental rights, acknowledging the considerable increase in their responsibilities, the importance of cooperation among them, and their vital role in reinforcing cooperation and coordination among the Member States;
Amendment 59 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes, with reference to its resolution of 25 October 2018 on the use of Facebook users’ data by Cambridge Analytica and the impact on data protection, that the fight against disinformation and any other type of foreigninappropriate interference is a priority to ensure fair and democratic elections, in particular in the year of the European elections; requests additional financial resources to invest in tools such as the recent What the EU does for me initiative to inform citizens on the Union’s work and highlight the efforts undertaken to promote peace, democracy, the rule of law and freedom of speech;
Amendment 75 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates that social cohesion in Europe must contribute to sustainable solutionsStresses that cohesion policy programmes are now at cruising speed, and emphasises Parliament’s commitment to ensure adequate appropriations for these programmes; calls on the Member States to ensure that the implementation of the programmes is accelerated so as to catch up with the delays, and to seek the Commission’s assistance in this respect ; reiterates that social cohesion in Europe must contribute to sustainable solutions to the fight against discrimination and for better inclusion of people with disabilities, and to long-term structural demographic change; emphasises the need for financial resources to provide ageing populations in Europe with adequate support in terms of access to mobility, healthcare and public services;
Amendment 95 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Stresses that the 2020 budget must contribute to tackling environmental challenges and climate change; recalls the Union’s pledge to make the transition to a low-carbon circular economy, but and eventual full decarbonisation in line with the Paris climate agreement, regrets that the Union mightis falling short of its climate goals; requests increased financial resources for climate spending, including but not limited to LIFE and other programmes to support projects with European added value contributing to a clean energy transition and resource efficiency, as well as nature conservation, with a focus on biodiversity, habitats and endangered species; recalls the need for climate mainstreaming, including but not limited to the sectors of energy, transport and agriculture.
Amendment 104 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Recalls that, following the joint statement by the European Parliament, Council and Commission on the reinforcement of Heading 1a through an Amending budget issued in the joint conclusions on the 2019 budget, the Commission will present an amending budget raising the levels of appropriations for Erasmus+ and H2020 as soon as the technical adjustment of the MFF for 2020 is completed in the spring of 2019 in order for the Council and the European Parliament to process it swiftly;
Amendment 111 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Invites the Commission to report specifically on the amounts de-committed for research programmes and to provide all relevant information and details concerning Article 15(3) of the Financial Regulation; expects this Article and its corresponding procedure to be fully respected in the context of the 2020 budgetary procedure; asks the Council presidency to clarify early on whether Article 15(3) is now fully understood by all Member States, and if not, what it intends to do about it;
Amendment 112 #
2019/2001(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Invites the Commission to report specifically on the amounts de-committed for research programmes and to provide all relevant information and details concerning Article 15(3) of the Financial Regulation; expects this Article and its corresponding procedure to be fully respected and mobilised in the context of the 2020 budgetary procedure and expects that the 2020 draft budget will make full use of this provision to boost research and innovation on top of the financial programming;
Amendment 5 #
2018/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Principality of Andorra (Andorra), the Principality of Monaco (Monaco) and the Republic of San Marino (San Marino) arhave am long the oldest European-standing history of stateshood; whereas they have always been at the core of European history and have deep, long-standing political, economic and cultural relations with the Member States in their immediate proximity and with the EU at large;
Amendment 30 #
2018/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
a) seize the opportunity presented by the negotiations on the Association Agreement to demonstrate the value of closer relations and integration with the EU – looking at public opinion both in Andorra, Monaco and San Marino and in the EU – and to further reaffirm the value of EU membershipimportance of the inclusion in the EU bodies and policies for such countries in the longer term;
Amendment 45 #
2018/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
g a) urge Andorra, Monaco and San Marino to step up efforts as regards tax and bank transparency even though fiscal policy is not part of this agreement;
Amendment 56 #
2018/2246(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
j) conclude before the end of the current mandate a joint political agrestatement with Andorra, Monaco and San Marino in order to take stock of and preserve the agreement reached in the negotiations thus far, so that the new European Commission and the European External Action Service can take stock of and build on this common understanding and advance negotiations further;
Amendment 17 #
2018/2176(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Council and the EEAS to fulfil their legal obligation to send to the European Parliament, without delay and without requiring requests, all relevant documents related to negotiations on international agreements, including negotiating directives, agreed texts and minutes of each negotiation round in line with Article 218(10) TFEU;
Amendment 20 #
2018/2176(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Welcomes the Union’s decision, in line with the European Ombudsman's recommendation, to offer paid traineeships with its foreign delegations and to suspend unpaid traineeships, thereby making them accessible also to young people of limited financial resources in accordance with the principle of non-discrimination.
Amendment 16 #
2018/2166(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes with concern that the Commission has made little use of conditionality to support reforms in the priority sectors in Turkey where progress in democracy and rule of law were unsatisfactory; stresses the importance of redirecting funds to civil society and making more use of the direct management mode; asks the Commission to implement all recommendations made by the ECA on the Facility for Refugees in Turkey, notably improving monitoring and reporting on cash-assistance projects and improving with the Turkish authorities the operating environment for (I)NGOs; notes that the ECA in its report on the EU pre- accession assistance to Turkey stresses that funds spent under IPA have barely addressed some fundamental needs, including press freedom, impartiality of justice and reinforcing civil society.
Amendment 17 #
2018/2166(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Insists on the need to closely monitor the use of funds of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey, ensuring that these funds are accurately targeting refugee projects and not used for any other purposes; calls on the Commission to report regularly to the budgetary authority on the compatibility of the actions financed with the underlying legal basis;
Amendment 18 #
2018/2166(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Is concerned that the use of other financial mechanisms alongside the EU budget to deliver EU policies, such as trust funds, seriously risks to undermine accountability and transparency;
Amendment 8 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the set of EU thematic guidelines on human rights, including on Human Rights Dialogues with third countries and on Human Rights Defenders,
Amendment 75 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with concern that, eight years after the first upheavals, most of the expectatthe legitimate aspirations of dignity, human rights and social and political reform of the people of the regions have in most countries still not been met; condemns the persistent and continuing violations of human rights, the rule of law and fundamental freedoms in several cases, the widespread discrimination against minorities and the repressive response to demands of self-determination; is worried about the socio-economic situation in the region, which continues to be dire and, in particular, about the high levels of youth unemployment and social exclusion, which cause disillusionment and disenfranchisement on a large scale; deplores the persistent levels of corruption, nepotism and unaccountability of many ruling elites of the region;
Amendment 85 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Notes with particular concern that civil society and human rights defenders across the MENA region face increasing threats, reprisals, judicial harassment, arbitrary detention, torture and ill- treatment and other forms of persecution; emphasises the need for the EU and Member States to prioritise and step up their support to civil society and human rights defenders whose work is indispensable for the long-term stability and security of these countries; stresses in this context, the critical importance for EU and Member States officials to act on individual cases, including through public statements, demarches and trial observation, as well as to enhance assistance to human rights defenders at risk, including through direct meetings and emergency support;
Amendment 91 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Notes with concern the particular role and responsibility of the military and the security services in the deterioration of the political trajectory of several countries in the aftermath of the Arab Spring and their persistent and dominating control over State and economic resources; calls on the EU and Member States to adequately incorporate this fundamental dimension within their engagement with the MENA region; urges the EU to prioritise the support of parliamentary and civil society efforts towards greater accountability and transparency of the security and military services;
Amendment 93 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Notes with serious concern the increasing recourse by the governments in the MENA region to repressive counter- terrorism and cybersecurity legislation as a means to stifle dissent and to criminalise and persecute human rights defenders; calls on the EU and Member States to engage with national authorities to end such practices and to repeal repressive legislation, and to ensure that exports of European surveillance technology and technical assistance strictly comply with EU legislation and are not complicit in human rights violations;
Amendment 99 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the EU’s efforts to promote democracy, the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms in post-Arab Spring countries, and acknowledges the complexity of such a task; takes the view, however, that, despite a fifteen-year policy focus on Southern and Eastern Mediterranean countries, renewed policy efforts and increased budgetary resources in the wake of the Arab Spring, the EU’s goals and policies have not yet been achieved; considers that the lack of EU leadership and initiative towards the resolution of protracted conflicts, such as Western Sahara or Palestine, have undermined its diplomatic clout and its holistic ambitions towards the region;
Amendment 128 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Takes the view that for far too long the policy stance towards the Maghreb and Mashreq countries was marred by an approach which was State-centred, based to too great an extent on the EU’s expectations and objectives, with little incentive for and ownership by beneficiary countrieinsufficient attention for addressing the root causes of the Arab Spring and the aspirations of the local populations; regrets that the initial efforts after the Arab Spring to introduce stricter conditionality and delivery incentives in relation to beneficiary countries through the ‘more for more’ principle did not lead to greater leverage on the part of the EU in its ability to promote real change in the areas of democracy, human rights and fundamental freedoms in most countries;
Amendment 143 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Acknowledges the initial efforts by the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Commission, in cooperation and dialogue with the European Parliament, to substantially reform the EU policy framework for post- Arab Spring countries in the hope of attaining real democratic and political leverage in the Maghreb and Mashreq regions; points to the Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy and its added value as regards the potential for achieving synergies in actions at EU level, building on political and economic dialogue and securing adequate support and implementation through the Financial Instruments for the external action of the EU; takes note of the 2015 revision of the European Neighbourhood Policy aimed at taking into account the changing scenarios in the region; insists on the importance of in-depth, annual country by country reporting on the implementation of the ENP;
Amendment 145 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Is concerned by the social and political impact of the austerity measures carried out across the region, which by reducing public spending and the provision of public services, contribute to increasing social and economic hardship among a large share of the population, which in turn fuels social unrest; notes with concern the direct role of international donors, notably the European Union through its macro- financial assistance programmes, in this process;
Amendment 154 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned, however, that the complexity of managingresponding adequately to the migration and refugee flows from and through the Maghreb and Mashreq regions, the nexus between security andan excessively security-focused perspective on migration, the challenge of terrorism and the legitimate concerns about the fragility of certain countries in the region, reduced consideration to climate change imperatives as well as the lack of a cohesive approach by the Member States, is encouraging the EU’s action towards the region to rely excessively on an narrow and short-sighted ideology of stability; takes the view that when stability and security become the predominant objectives, they lead to a counterproductive, shorter-term policy vision and deprivundermine EU action directed at reaffirmingand credibility in its support of human rights and fundamental freedoms of the required intensity; is convinced that sustainable stability and security can only be achieved through longer-term objectivesan approach centered on the preservation of the environment and on human rights, rule of law and democracy;
Amendment 170 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomesarns that the concept of co- ownership put forward by the revised European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP); is concerned, however, that it runs the risk of allowing authoritarian regimes in certain partner countries to cherry-pick priorities according to their national agenda, instead of advancing along the path towards democratisation; notes with concern that some programmes agreed under this revised policy notably in the field of counter-terrorism, security, judiciary and migration, might actually be conducive to strengthening negative human rights trends; stresses, therefore, the importance of a long-term policy framework and synergies in programming for post-Arab Spring countries based on the primacy of democracy, the inclusion of all democratic political forces and the primacy of the rule of law, human rights and fundamental values; reiterates that strengthening these aspects is in the interests of the partner countries and their populations, as well as of the EU, and calls for stronger conditionality in this sense; insists that in cases of systematic violations of human rights by the authorities, EU assistance should exclude budget support, as a direct endorsement of public policy, and should be restricted to supporting local civil society;
Amendment 191 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes the view that, as the EU strugglefails to come up with a renewed vision for the management of migration and assistance to refugeesforward-looking, rights-based and people-centred vision for its migration and asylum policy, there is an increasing risk that some countries in the region might use migration containment and their role therein to seek greater leverage in their political and policy dialogue with the EU and to side-line human rights and democracy priorities therein; stresses, instead, the importance of a policy framework promoting democratic, political and socio- economic inclusion as mutually reinforcing factors; is convinced that, where the prerequisites for the negotiation of Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements, conditional on democratic progress, are not yet in place, the EU should provide increased access to trade and investment, and assistance for reconstruction and infrastructure modernisation in strict correlation with progressive political and economic reforms;
Amendment 203 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Points out the risk that the EU’s action for the region and theis undermined by uncoordinated and unilateral approaches pursued by Member States through bilateral relations may not be in harmony, and that the EU’s capacity to make a political impact might be lost as a result; welcomes, in this context, the proposal made by the President of the Commission to move beyond unanimity in Council decision-making in foreign affairs, as it could help the EU to speak with one voice in its foreign relations and have greater leverage;
Amendment 206 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Expresses concern at the continued export of arms and security equipment by Member States to authorities in the region which fail to respect human rights and international humanitarian law; urges Member States to strictly comply with the EU Common Position on Arms Exports, which among others states that export licences should be denied where there is a clear risk that the military technology or equipment to be exported might be used for internal repression or for the commission of serious violations of international humanitarian law; calls on the VP/HR to provide to Parliament a detailed overview of the Member States' arms exports to the MENA region;
Amendment 211 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for closer and genuine involvement of local civil society in the identification of needs in the partner countries; welcomes the efforts by the EEAS and the Commission to broaden civil society outreach and include the private sector, and encourages them to do more in this regard; takes the view that the EU shouland human rights defenders in the elaboration, implementation and evaluation of Partnership Priorities and Single Support Frameworks with the partner countries and the bilateral dialogue with national and local authorities; welcomes the efforts by the EEAS and the Commission to broaden civil society outreach and include the private sector, and encourages them to do more in this regard; emphasises the need to ensure the participation of genuinely independent civil society, including unregistered groups, as well as that of interlocutors located in remote and rural areas; takes the view that the EU should refrain from engaging through government-controlled agencies and make access to available funds for smaller civil society organisations (CSOs) easier, streamline the application processes and focus on local CSOs while avoiding government-organized NGOs (GONGOs); points out the perception among local civil society interlocutors of a primary focus by the EU on large, international CSOs; calls on the EU to invest more resources in promoting the capacity building of local CSOs and facilitating enhanced partnerships between them and large, international CSOs, with a view to increasing local ownership; calls for direct financial support for independent civil society organizations to be clearly earmarked and secured in EU assistance programming;
Amendment 222 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls the importance of securing adequate visibility for EU efforts and EU assistance and investment in the region; calls in particular for the reinstatement of the mandate of an EU Special Representative for the Southern Mediterranean, which would spearhead EU engagement with the region and provide hightened EU visibility;
Amendment 229 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that with a view to increasing the EU’s capacity to make a political and policy impact and to promote ownership and widespread support by beneficiary countries, each EU Delegation should set up high-level advisory councils comprising economic, media, cultural, academic and civil society leaders from the country concerned, including those living in exile or abroad, and providing input as regards policy priorities and the policy architecture devised by the EU;
Amendment 242 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls the added value of parliamentary diplomacy and of the regular bilateral interparliamentary meetings which Parliament holds with its counterparts from the Southern Neighbourhood as a tool for exchanging experiences and fostering mutual understanding; encourages the EU’s national parliaments to hold bilateral interparliamentary meetings within the framework of the ENP; underlines once more that political parties in the national parliaments and the European Parliament can play a role in this regard; takes the view that dialogue between the European Parliament, EU national parliaments and the parliaments of the Southern Neighbourhood could provide a very valuable opportunity to foster regional dialogue and cooperation in the Southern Neighbourhood; points, moreover, in this context, tonotes with regret, however, that the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean as(PA UfM) has yet to meet the expectations of being a venue where regional integration and an ambitious political and economic agenda for this organisation could be re- dynamised; expresses concern at the institutional duplication of the PA UfM and the Parliamentary Assembly for the Mediterranean and believes that interparliamentary dialogue around the Mediterranean would gain in efficiency, visibility and purpose by merging both institutions; regrets also the side-lining of the PA UfM within the regional framework of the Union for the Mediterranean and calls for greater transparency and parliamentary oversight of UfM activities, notably the UfM labelled projects;
Amendment 246 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that women’s rights, gender equality and the right to non-discrimination of vulnerable groups are fundamental rights and key principles of the EU’s external action; observes that while some encouraging progress may be noted in these areas in some countries, notably Tunisia, the overall situation remains characterised by deep-rooted patriarchy, gender inequality and violence against women; notes also that women's rights defenders face arbitrary detention, judicial harassment, smear campaigns and intimidation;
Amendment 254 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Denounces the widespread and systematic persecution against LGBTI persons and LGBTI rights defenders across the MENA region, including judicial harassment, physical attacks and smear campaigns; calls on the EU and Member States to enhance their support to LGBTI defenders and to engage effectively with the national authorities on the matter;
Amendment 9 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
– having regard to the granting of the European Parliament Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought and Expression to Saudi blogger and activist Raif Badawi in 2015 for his remarkable efforts to foster open discussion of religion and politics in his country; having regard to his continued detention following his sentencing to 10 years in jail, 1000 lashes and a large fine for supposedly "insulting Islam",
Amendment 12 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief, commonly referred to as the right to freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) is a human right inherent to all human beings and a fundamental right of individuals which should be subjected to no kind of discrimination, as enshrined by international and European founding texts, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas FoRB implies the right of the individual to choose what to believe and not to believe, the right to change or abandon one’s religion and convictions without any constraints, and the right to practise and manifest the religion or theistic, non-theistic or atheistic belief of one’s choice, whether individually or in community and whether in private or in public, the right to not to profess any religion or belief, and the right to express critical or satirical opinions on religions and religious authorities as a legitimate expression of freedom of thought or artistic creation; whereas the manifestation of religion or belief can be expressed in worship, teaching, practice and observance; whereas FoRB entails the right of believers’ and non-believers’ communities to preserve their ethos and to act in accordance with it, and the entitlement for their religious and non- confessional organisations to have recognised legal personality; whereas protecting individuals adhering to any religion or none and effectively addressing violations of FoRB, such as discrimination or legal restrictions based on religion or belief, are primordial conditions to ensure that individuals may enjoy FoRB on an equal basis;
Amendment 32 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas FoRB directly contributes to democracy, development, the rule of law, peace and stability; whereas violations of FoRB are increasingly widespread, affect people in all parts of the world and may exacerbate intolerance, often constituting early indicators of potential violence and conflicts;
Amendment 39 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas 22 countries still criminalise apostasy, including 12 where it is punishable by death; whereas blasphemy is criminalized in 43 countries and is punishable by death in 6 countries; whereas at least 14 EU Member States maintain criminal blasphemy or religious insult laws; whereas the UN-sponsored Rabat Plan of Action on the prohibition of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence of 2013, recommends that "States that have blasphemy laws should repeal them, as such laws have a stifling impact on the enjoyment of freedom of religion or belief, and healthy dialogue and debate about religion;"
Amendment 40 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas the non-religious, and secular and humanist organizations are facing growing persecution, including unprecedented waves of incitement and hatred and killings, in a number of countries; whereas countless individuals and civil society organisations are under assault for peacefully questioning, criticizing or satirizing religious beliefs; whereas this ongoing violation of their freedom of thought and of expression occurs across geographic and cultural borders, including within EU Member States;
Amendment 50 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that religion or belief is an importor non-belief continues to represent ant undeniable pillaraspect of human identity, greatly impacting individuals and societies, and is therefore a reality that must not be neglected or denied in policies but requires proper recognition and addressing; observes that atheism and the non- religious population are growing rapidly worldwide and should not be neglected in the EU policy framework on freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief;
Amendment 65 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses its deep concern at the fact that recent years have seen a dramatic rise inwidespread violations of FoRB worldwide, including persecution based on thought, conscience, religion or belief; stresses that these violations are frequently at the root of or increasingly exacerbate wars or other forms of armed conflict, resulting in violations of humanitarian law, including mass murders or genocide; stresses that violations of FoRB undermine democracy, impede developdeplores in particular the ongoing rollback and regression on sexual and reproductive rights of woment, and negatively affect the enjoyment of other fundamental freedoms and rights; emphasises that this obligates the international community, the EU and its Member States to reaffirm their determination and strengthen girl and rights of LGBTI persons, notably under the guise of religious principles or doctrine; stresses that violations of individual rights, including FoRB, negatively affect the enjoyment of otheir actions in promoting FoRBfundamental freedoms and rights;
Amendment 70 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Denounces the recourse to blasphemy, apostasy or other accusations based on religious grounds , in order to crack-down on human rights defenders in relation to their legitimate activities, including on the Internet and social media, and more broadly to restrict civil society space; in this context, denounces the continued detention of Sakharov Prize laureate Raif Badawi after an unlawful trial and presses the Saudi authorities to immediately and unconditionally release him;
Amendment 72 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, in accordance with Article 21 TEU, the EU and its Member States have pledged to enhance respect for human rights, as a principle guiding EU foreign policy; strongly welcomes the fact that the 2013 EU Guidelines mainstream this fundamental freedom into EU foreign policy and external actions, and in this regard calls for its further strengthening;
Amendment 74 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that, in accordance with Article 17 TFEU, the EU is committed to maintaining open, transparent and regular dialogues with churches and religious, philosophical and non-confessional organisations; highlights the supporting effect of these dialogues for respect for other human rights, equal rights for women, children’s rights, as well as for democracy, development, the rule of law, good governance, peace and stability, and environmental and labour standards; stresses that such interreligious and intercultural dialogues are often met by greater openness by some EU international partners and create a starting-point for progress in other areas;
Amendment 86 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. CommendsTakes note of the creation of the post of Special Envoy for the promotion of FoRB outside the EU in 2016 by the President of the Commission, in response to the resolution of Parliament of 4 February 2016; considersyet regrets that the appointment of theMr Figel as Special Envoy was an important step forward andnounced by European Commission President Juncker from Vatican City; considers the appointment of the Special Envoy as a clear recognition of FoRB as one of the core parts ofwithin the human rights agenda of EU foreign policy and external actions, both bilateral and multilateral, and within development cooperation; praistresses the Special Envoy for his continuous engagement and cooperation and complementarity of actionsimportance of the Special Envoy's engagement and cooperation with the EU Special Representative for Human Rights on this issue, including the promotion of the EU Guidelines; commends the Commissioner on International Cooperation and Development, together with the Commission’s DG DEVCO, for actively supporting the Special Envoy;
Amendment 92 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of linking up efforts to promote FoRB and inter- and intra-religious as well as inter-convictional dialogues with the prevention of violent extremism on a complementary and mutually reinforcing basis, in particular within neighbouring and other countries with which the EU has special relations;
Amendment 103 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Deplores the fact that some countries have, enforce or seek to introduce penal laws providing punishment for blasphemy, conversion or apostasy, including the death penalty; also draws attention to the situation of some other countries facing or being at risk of conflicts of a religious dimension; calls for the EU to prioritise in its foreign policy efforts towards all the countries concerned with a view to the repeal of such discriminatory laws and to put an end to the repression of human rights defenders and the shrinking of civil society space on religious grounds;
Amendment 109 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the fact that the Special Envoy has developed effective working networks within the Commission, the Council, and the European Parliament, as well as with other stakeholders; deplores, however, the fact thatcalls on the Special Envoy to coordinate closely also with the European External Action Service and the EU Special Envoy’s mandate was not established and consolidated wiRepresentative for Human Rights and to report annually on the countries visited and his thematic priorities; encourages the Special Envoy not to neglect the sufficient human and financial resourcesituation of non- believers and to enhance his outreach and advocacy in relation to the non- confessional dimension of his mandate;
Amendment 116 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Council and the Commission to strengthen the Special Envoy’s institutional mandate and capacity, by earmarking funding and human resources adequate to the Envoy’s duties, developing a systemic institutionalisation of working networks established by the Special Envoy within all relevant EU institutions or establishing the posicarry out a transparent and comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness and added value of the creation of the position of the Special Envoy, including in terms of possible duplication ofwith the EU Special Representative for FoRBHuman Rights, before considering to renew the mandate;
Amendment 124 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – introductory part
Paragraph 12 – introductory part
12. Calls on the Council and the Commission to reflect on creating the EU Special Representative for FoRB; considers that the competavoid duplication of and to clarify the distribution of tasks and responsibilities between the Special Envoy for FoRB and the EU Special Representative for Human Rights, noting that the mandate of the latter includes the promotion of freedom of thought, consciences and mandate of this Special Representativebelief and the EU policy in that field; considers that EU external action in this area should include:
Amendment 130 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – point b
Paragraph 12 – point b
(b) providing the European Parliament, the Council, the Vice- President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission with an annual progress report and a comprehensive implementation report on the mandate at the end thereofinclude a FoRB-dedicated chapter in the Commission and Council's annual report on human rights;
Amendment 138 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 145 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 153 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recommends the setting up of a regularn informal advisory working group of Member States’ FoRB institutions and European Parliament representatives together with experts, scholars, and representatives of civil society, including churches and other faith-basedonfessional and non-confessional organisations, providing advice on FoRB issues to assist the Special Envoy;
Amendment 158 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recommends that the EU Special EnvoyRepresentative for Human Rights further develop cooperation with counterparts outside the EU, in particular by working in close cooperation with the UN Special Rapporteurs, including on FoRB, as well as exploring the possibility of EU-UN joint annual reporting on discriminationinitiatives on discrimination against non- believers (including atheists, apostats, agnostics, humanists etc.) as well as against religious minorities, also formulating common proposals on how to put an end to such acts;
Amendment 169 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Urgently calls for the implementation of all EU thematic Guidelines on Human Rights, including the EU Guidelines on FoRB to be increased in intensity and effectiveness; notes that further dedicated efforts need to be made by the EU and its Member States to implement more effectively the EU Guidelines and make the EU more influential in advancing FoRBthem worldwide; stresses that understanding how societies may be shaped and influenced by religions and other beliefs, including non-belief, is instrumental to better comprehending the promotion of FoRB in EU foreign policy and international cooperation; calls for a particular attention to be paid to the situation of non-believers facing discrimination and violence;
Amendment 175 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Commends, in this respect, the efforts made to date by the EEAS and the Commission to provide training on religious literacy to EU officials and national diplomats; stresses, however,Stresses the need for broader and more systematic training programmes which would raise awareness of and increase the use of the EU Gthematic human rights guidelines among the EU’s and Member States’ officials and diplomats and strengthen cooperation with the Special Envoy; asks for churches and religious communities and associations to be involved in this training process; calls on the Commission and the Council to earmark resources for establishing such training programmes;
Amendment 183 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to producensure a FoRB-dedicated chapter in the EU Annual Reports on FoRBHuman Rights and Democracy in the world, to be communicated to the European Parliament and the Council; notes that the EU Guidelines on FoRB provide for an evaluation of their implementation by COHOM after a period of three years, and that no such evaluation has been communicated or made public; calls for the evaluation to be made public without delay; considers that the evaluation should highlight best practices, identify areas for improvement, and provide concrete recommendations on implementation in accordance with a specified timeline and milestones subject to regular annual evaluation; calls for the evaluation to be included in the EU Annual Reports on FoRB on Human Rights and Democracy in the wWorld;
Amendment 188 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines the responsibilities fulfilled by human rights focal points within all EU Delegations and CSDP Missions; calls for the designating of FoRB-specific focal points in every, including in relation to FoRB, within all EU Delegations and CSDP Missions; calls for more resources to be allocated to EU Delegations and CSDP Missions so as to allow them to carry out their work of promoting FoRB;
Amendment 208 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Expresses its satisfaction that FoRB is identified as a priority of the European Instrument of Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR); welcomes the significantnotes the increase of EIDHR funding allocated to FoRB-related projects since the adoption of the EU Guidelines; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to ensure that EU diplomatic work for the promotion of human rights, including FoRB, and EIDHR-funded projects is mutually reinforcing; insists that funds allocated to FoRB-related projects be fairly distributed among confessional and non-confessional groups; stresses that FoRB can also be supported by other instruments than human rights- oriented funds, among others those dedicated to the conflict prevention dimension or to education and culture; calls on the Commission and the Council to maintain sufficient funding for FoRBhuman rights-related projects under the EU external financial instruments, within the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2021-2027;
Amendment 215 #
2018/2155(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that the EU’s policies in the fields of peace, security and conflict prevention and development and cooperation face challenges, for which solutions can be devised among others with the participation of secular and non- confessional groups and activists, churches, religious leaders, academics, religious communities and associations or faith-based organisations that are a critical part of civil society; acknowledges the importance of being mindful of the diversity of non-confessional organizations, churches, religious communities and associations and faith- based organisations which perform actual development and humanitarian work for and with communities; calls on the Council and the Commission to incorporate, where relevant, objectives and activities relating to the promotion and protection of FoRB into the programming of funding instruments linked to those policies, namely the EDF, the DCI, the ENI, the IcSP and the IPA;
Amendment 27 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
— having regard to the Commission recommendation of 21 December 2016 for a Council decision authorising the opening of negotiations with Turkey on an agreement on the extension of the scope of the bilateral preferential trade relationship and on the modernisation of the Customs Union, and to the decision of the Council of June 2018 of not undertaking further work towards the modernisation of the EU-Turkey Customs Union,
Amendment 30 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
Citation 22 a (new)
- having regard to the Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the impact of the state of emergency on human rights in Turkey, including an update on the South-East, of March 2018,
Amendment 33 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the decision of 19 July 2018 to lift the state of emergency, which was introduced after the 2016 coup attempt and extended 7 times; notesstresses however that the prolonged state of emergency has led to an eros serious deterioration of the rule of law and deteriorof human rights in Turkey which may have long-lasting implications of human rights inn the institutional and socio-economic fabric of Turkey; regrets that the adoption of new legislative proposals preserves many of the abusive powers granted to the President and the executive under the state of emergency including the possibility for local governors to impose curfews and to restrict access to parts of the territory they govern, and thereby dampens any positive effect of its termination;
Amendment 43 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. RecallsIs deeply concerned that over 150 000 people were taken into custody in the post-coup crackdown and 78 000 have been arrested on terrorism charges, while more than 50 000 people remain in jail in most of the cases without any convincing proof for the charges or links to violence and often solely based on "evidence" allegedly linking them to the Gülen movement; expresses concern at the excessively lengthy pre-trial detention and judicial proceedings, the fact that in several cases no indictment has been issued yet, and the harshness of detention conditions; is particularly concerned at the fact that such arrests seem to also target legitimate voices of dissent, human rights defenders or members of the opposition; is very worried at the allegations of ill-treatment and torture of those in prison, as reported by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and several human rights organisations;
Amendment 52 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that since the introduction of the state of emergency more than 152 000 civil servants - including teachers, doctors, (peace) academics, lawyers, judges and prosecutors - have been dismissed on the basis of alleged coup links; notes that 125 000 people applied to the Inquiry Commission on the State of Emergency Measures (CoSEM), which is tasked with reviewing and deciding within two years on complaints against measures taken under the state of emergency and related decrees, and 89 000 of them are still awaiting a decision; is concerned about the narrow scope of the mandate of the Inquiry Commission, its lack of independence, and the fact that examinations are made on the sole basis of documents in the case-file, without participation of the person concerned; notstresses that the dismissals have had an extremely harsh impact on the individuals concerned and on their families, including financially, and come with a lasting social and professional stigma; calls on the Turkish government to ensure that all individuals have the right to have their cases reviewed by an independent court in accordance with international standards that can award compensation for the material and moral damage caused by their arbitrary dismissal;
Amendment 57 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that more than 300.000 passports have been confiscated since the start of the State of Emergency in 2016; notes that no progress has been made after the presidential statement that promised the enabling of the passports of the relatives of detainees;
Amendment 62 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Condemns the increased executive control over and political interference with the work of judges and prosecutorsand the extreme political pressure on the work of judges and prosecutors; stresses that the legislative proposals adopted after the lifting of the state of emergency further hinder judicial independence; stresses that a serious reform of the legislative and judicial branches of power is needed for Turkey to comply with its obligations under international human rights law; is awaiting, in this regard, the Reform Action Group’s action plan on judicial reforms;
Amendment 66 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Expresses serious concern about the disproportionate and arbitrary measures curtailing freedom of expression, media freedom and access to information; stresses that Turkey is the world´s biggest jailer of journalists, with more than 300 arrested since the coup attempt; condemns the closure of more than 160 media outlets and the large number of arrests of journalists in the aftermath of the coup attempt; urges Turkey to guarantee media freedom as a matter of priority and to immediately release and acquit all unlawfully detained journalists; regrets the fact that more than 100 000 websites were blocked in Turkey during the last year, including a high number of pro-Kurdish websites and satellite TV channels;
Amendment 81 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. ExpressesIs extremely concern aed about the shrinking space for civil society and the promotion of fundamental rights and freedoms; notecondemns that a large number of activists, including human rights defenders, were arrested and demonstrations were recurrently banned during the state of emergency; calls on Turkey to protect the fundamental rights of minorities, such as LGBTI people;
Amendment 93 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on all EU Member States not to follow through on extradition requests by the Turkish government concerning individuals with alleged “terror links”, including former Sakharov prize finalist Can Dündar; stresses that those individuals would not have their right to a fair trial in Turkey guaranteed; calls on all EU Member States to grant humanitarian visa to citizens that are persecuted so that they can travel to the EU in a safe way in order to find protection;
Amendment 101 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Calls on Turkish authorities to immediately and unconditionally release all detained human rights defenders and to drop all charges against them; stresses that Turkish authorities must enable them to carry out their work free of threat and impediment in all circumstances;
Amendment 123 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Is deepseriously concerned atby the situation in Turkey’s South-East and the serious allegations of hnumerous cases of excessive use of force; killings; enforced disappearances; torture; destruction of housing and cultural heritage; incitement to hatred; prevention of access to emergency medical care, food, water and livelihoods; violence against women; and severe curtailment of the right to freedom of opinion and expression as well as political participation in the South East, as documented by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human rRights abuses, especially since the collapse of the Kurdish settlement process in 2015; reiterates its firm condemnation of the return to violence by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which has been on the EU list of terrorist organisations since 2002praises the work of human rights defenders such as Nurcan Baysal whose activity has allowed the documentation of human rights violations in the region; regrets the long-lasting consequences that the civil war in the South East of Turkey has had on the population; expresses its deep disappointment and reiterates its firm condemnation of the return to violence in the South-East by the different parties; stresses the urgency of resuming a credible political process involving all concerned parties and democratic forces leading to a peaceful settlement of the Kurdish issue; calls on Turkey to promptly investigate serious allegations of human rights abuses and killings, to bring perpetrators to justice and to allow international observers to carry out an independent verification;
Amendment 131 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Is particularly concerned by the destruction of historical heritage sites in the South-East, including of Diyarbakir´s ancient Sur which was included in UNESCO´s World Heritage List, by the Turkish government, threatening the preservation of Kurdish identity and culture; condemns that the implementation of reconstruction programmes has been done without the participation of the concerned population;
Amendment 138 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Notes with concern that during the state of emergency a very large number of mayors and co-mayors in the South-East were dismissed or arrested and that the Government appointed trustees to replace them; stresses that as a result, a third of Turkey’s population was not represented by the people they had elected at the 2016 local elections; takes the view that the municipal elections in March 2019 must provide an important opportunity to fully reinstate the principle of direct democratic mandate;
Amendment 150 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Condemns the continued arrest of Selahattin Demirtas, opposition leader and presidential candidate; pledges to continue to follow his case very closely and calls for his immediate and unconditional release; expects the European Court of Human Rights to deliver without delay its final judgement in the cwelcomes the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights on the case of Selahattin Demirtas, which calls on the Turkish authorities to immediately release him; stresses that the European Court of Human Rights further ruled that Demirtaş’s detention, especially during two crucial electoral campaigns, namely the referendum and the presidential election, had pursued the predominant ulterior purpose of stifling pluralism and limiting freedom of political debate, which is at the very core of the concept of a democratic society; condemns the intention of Turkish authorities to contravene the ruling of the ECHR; expects the EU and its Member States to follow his case very closely and calls for his immediate and unconditional release;
Amendment 157 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Amendment 177 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. CTaking all of the above into account, calls on the Commission and the Member States, taking all of the above into account and in accordance with the Negotiating Framework, to formally suspend the accession negotiations with Turkeyo keep accession talks frozen until credible reforms with an aim to align Turkey's legal and institutional system with the EU Acquis are implemented, especially with regards to the protection and promotion of the principles of democracy, human rights and rule of law; remains, however, committed to democratic dialogue with Turkey; asks the Commission to use, during the formal suspension of negotiations, all funds available under IPA II and the future IPA III to support, through a dedicated envelope directly managed by the EU, Turkey’s civil society, and to increase opportunities for people-to-people contacts, academic dialogue, access for Turkish students to European universities and media platforms for journalists;
Amendment 209 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. BelievNotes that a door should be left openthe Commission proposal for the modernisation and upgrading of the 1995 Customs Union between the EU and Turkey, to includes relevant areas such as agriculture, services and public procurement, which currently are not covered; recalls that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States and that Turkey is an important growth market for the EU; believes that the upgrade would provide a valuable opportunity for democratic conditionality, positive leverage and the possibility of a roadmap whercalls on the Commission not to start preparatory works for the upgradinge of the Customs Union would go hand in hand with concrete commitments by Turkeyuntil the Turkish government indicates its readiness for serious reforms in the fields onf democratic reformscy, human rights and rule of law; believes further that the upgrading of the Customs Union wouldincentive of an upgrade provides an important valuable opportunity for policy dialogue on climate change as well as on labour rights in Turkey; calls on the Commission to start preparatory work for the upgrading of the Customs Union as soon as the Turkish Government indicates its readiness for serious reformsex ante democratic conditionality; calls on the Commission to include a binding and enforceable non-execution clause on human rights and fundamental freedoms in any future upgraded Customs Union between Turkey and the EU;
Amendment 215 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Calls on the Turkish Government to halt its plans for the construction of the Akkuyu nuclear power plant; points out that the envisaged site is located in a region prone to severe earthquakes, hence posing a major threat not only to Turkey, but also to the Mediterranean region; requests, accordingly, that the Turkish Government join the Espoo Convention, which commits its parties to notifying and consulting each other on major projects under consideration that are likely to have a significant adverse environmental impact across boundaries; asks, to this end, the Turkish Government to involve, or at least consult, the governments of its neighbouring countries in relation to any further developments in the Akkuyu venture;
Amendment 225 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Points out that trade union freedom and social dialogue are vital to the development of a pluralistic society; regretcondemns the legislative shortcomings on labour and trade union rights and stresses that the right to organise, the right to collective bargaining and the right to strike are fundamental rights of workers; is seriously concerned about the working conditions for workers during the construction of the new Istanbul airport, given that reportedly 38 workers have died in work-related accidents since the start of construction in May 2015 and 31 people, including a union leader, are currently held in prison for protesting against poor working conditions; calls on the Turkish authorities to consult closely with the relevant trade unions on the issue of necessary safeguards for workers on-site, to carry out a thorough investigation into the deaths and injuries, and to allow trade unions full access to the workers;
Amendment 240 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. NContinues its support to the visa liberalisation process once the set conditions have been met; notes that visa liberalisation is of great importance for Turkish citizens, particularly for students, academics, business representatives and people with family ties in EU Member States; encourages the Turkish Government to fully comply with the 72 criteria identified in the visa liberalisation roadmap; stresses that the revision of Turkey’s anti-terrorism legislation is a key condition for ensuring fundamental rights and freedoms, and that visa liberalisation will be possible once all the criteria have been met;
Amendment 253 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls the important role played by Turkey in responding to the migration crisis resulting from the war in Syria; takes the view that Turkey’s population has shown great hospitality by offering shelter to more than 3 million Syrian refugees; calls on the EU and its Member States to keep their promise regarding a large-scale resettlement, and to ensure adequate financial resources for the long-term support of Syrian refugees in Turkey; is concerned by reports that the border with Syria has been effectively closed to new asylum seekers, that several provinces suspended registration of newcomers, as well as by reports of abuses, excessive use of force, expulsions, returns and deportations of Syrian nationals, in contradiction of the non-refoulement principle, and calls on the European Commission to seek information and publicly report about abuses reportedly committed;
Amendment 293 #
2018/2150(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the efforts by the UN to resume negotiations on the reunification of Cyprus; supports a fair, comprehensive and viable settlement in line with the relevant UN Security Council resolutions and the EU acquis; reiterates its call on Turkey to commit and contribute to a comprehensive settlement, to begin withdrawing its troops from Cyprus, to transfer the sealed-off area of Famagusta to the UN, and to refrain from actions altering the demographic balance on the island; praises the important work of the Committee on Missing Persons which deals with both Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot missing persons; recognises the right of the Republic of Cyprus to enter into bilateral agreements concerning its exclusive economic zone; urges Turkeyboth parties to engage in the peaceful settlement of disputes, and to refrain from any threat or action which might have negative effects on good neighbourly relations; stresses the need for the implementation of the EU acquis in the northern part of the island; acknowledges in this regard the importance of the uninterrupted continuation of the work of the bi- communal ad-hoc committee on EU preparation; encourages both the European Parliament and the Commission to intensify their efforts to engage with Turkish Cypriots in preparation to fully integrate into the EU;
Amendment 9 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
8a having regard to its resolution of 11 April 2018 on protection of investigative journalists in Europe: the case of Slovak journalist Jan Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová
Amendment 12 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 29 November 2018 on The Cum Ex Scandal: financial crime and the loopholes in the current legal framework;
Amendment 19 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
Citation 19 a (new)
- having regard to the infringement procedures against 21 Member States for having not or only partially transposed AMLD4 into national law of which three are currently at the stage of court referrals (Romania, Ireland and now Luxembourg), with one on hold (Greece), nine at the stage of Reasoned Opinions, and eight at the stage of Letters of Formal Notice,
Amendment 20 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
Citation 20 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication on strengthening the Union framework for prudential and anti- money laundering supervision,
Amendment 21 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
Citation 21 a (new)
- having regard to the Recommendation of the EBA to the Maltese FIAU,
Amendment 22 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 b (new)
Citation 21 b (new)
- having regard to the Formal Opinion to the Maltese FIAU of the Commission,
Amendment 26 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 25 a (new)
Citation 25 a (new)
- having regard to reports on tax avoidance and tax evasion as challenges for governance, social protection and development in developing countries1a, and gender equality and taxation policies in the EU1b; _________________ 1a Report on tax avoidance and tax evasion as challenges for governance, social protection and development in developing countries (2015/2058(INI)) (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/get Doc.do?pubRef=- //EP//TEXT+REPORT+A8-2015- 0184+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN) 1b Gender equality and taxation policies in the EU (2018/2095(INI)) (https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oei l/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=&refere nce=2018/2095(INI)
Amendment 41 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Notes that money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance have important economic, political, and social impacts, including loss of tax revenue, productivity loss, unfair competition and inequality, and incentivise certain economic outcomes that undermine both the countries’ political stability and social contract; stresses that the negative effects on public resources also impact the realisation of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
Amendment 45 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Notes with regret that tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning are important factors causing income and wealth inequality, and have shifted the tax burden from rich individuals to poorer citizens, from capital income to labour income and consumption, from MNEs to SMEs and from the financial sector to the real economy; notes that this has resulted in weaker and less efficient tax-and- transfer systems that are essential to finance public goods and stabilise the economy;
Amendment 47 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Notes that tax evasion and tax avoidance are major contributors to gender inequality in the Union and globally as they limit the resources available to governments to increase equality at national and international level; calls on the Commission, the Council and the Member States to include a gender perspective in the formulation of its proposal to tackle tax evasion;
Amendment 51 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses that during the work of the TAX3 Special Committee more revelations concerning financial crimes, tax evasion and tax avoidance have come to light, particularly connected to cases such as those of the ABLV Bank in Latvia, the murder of investigative journalists Ján Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová, the Danske Bank in Denmark and Estonia or the Cum Ex scandal involving at least 11 EU countries; stresses that as a result of the Panama Papers scandal, four people have been charged in the US;
Amendment 60 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that during its current term the Commission has put forward 22 legislative proposals aimed at closing some of the loopholes, improving the fight against financial crimes and aggressive tax planning, and enhancing tax collection efficiency and tax fairness; calls for the swift adoption of initiatives that have not yet been finalised before the end of this legislature, particularly the key legislative proposals for public Country by Country reporting, Common Corporate tax Base and Common Consolidated Corporate tax base and digital taxation; and for careful monitoring of the implementation to ensure efficiency and proper enforcement, in order to keep pace with the versatility of tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Regrets that the Council has repeatedly failed to pass the measures that are necessary to require transnational corporations to fulfil their part of the social contract; notes that such failure undermines faith in the ability of democratic politicians to solve issues of injustice that are deeply troubling for our citizens;
Amendment 70 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Regrets that due to resistance of Member States, several legislative proposals in the field of tax justice have not been adopted yet to the detriment of European citizens.
Amendment 75 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Deplores again ‘the lack of reliable and unbiased statistics on the magnitude of tax avoidance and tax evasion [and] stresses the importance of developing appropriate and transparent methodologies to quantify the scale of these phenomena, as well as their impact on countries’ public finances, economic activities and public investments’; notes that transparency in general is central to the fight against money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance, and that some jurisdictions have interest in keeping the secrecy at place;
Amendment 84 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Council and Member States to prioritise projects, notably with the support of the Fiscalis programme, aimed at quantifying the magnitude of tax avoidance in order to better address the current tax gap; urges the Commission and Member States to analyse their tax gaps in the EU and Member States including VAT gaps in order to design tax policies in an effective manner.
Amendment 86 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on the Member States to estimate their tax gaps, and publish the results annually;
Amendment 91 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Highlights that close to 40 % of MNEs’ profits are shifted to tax havens globally each year and recognizes that certain jurisdictions within the EU, namely Luxemburg, Ireland and the Netherlands, are regular receivers of financial flows and reported profits generated elsewhere in the Union due to their very low or zero corporate, dividend and capital gains tax rates, and special tax provisions25 ; _________________ 25 Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘The missing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018.
Amendment 94 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Notes the tendency of corporations to produce their own estimates of ETRs - often based on bogus methods - which are then used to influence policy in a way that diminishes their tax liabilities;
Amendment 98 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls that the fight against tax evasion and fraud tackles illegal acts, whereas the fight against tax avoidance addresses situations that are a priori within the limits of the law but against its spirit and could be considered illegal; however, recalls with concern that this strict distinction ignores the existence of grey areas and fails to take sufficient account of the ability of powerful players to change tax law to suit themselves;
Amendment 107 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that ATP describes the setting of a tax design aimed at reducing tax liability by using the technicalities of a tax system or of mismatches between two or more tax systems that go against the spirit of the law and could be considered illegal;
Amendment 111 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Notes that the growing role of intangible assets in the MNE value chain and harmful R&D tax incentives are conducive to aggressive tax planning.;
Amendment 123 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the similarity between corporate tax payers and high-net-worth individuals in the use of corporate structures and similar structures such as trusts and offshore locations for the purpose of ATP; recalls the role of intermedia, in this regard, that for the wealthy most of their income arrives in setting up such schemethe form of capital gains rather than earnings;
Amendment 128 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the Commission’s assessment and inclusion of ATP indicators in its 2018 European Semester country reports; calls for such assessment to become a regular feature in order to ensure a level playing field in the EU internal market with a clear follow-up, as well as the greater stability of public revenue in the long run; regrets that so far no recommendations to end harmful tax practices have been put forward by the Commission in the course of the European Semester country reports, calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency of this exercise, including the follow-up, and to give countries concrete recommendations regarding the fight against aggressive tax planning strategies;
Amendment 143 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Reiterates its call on companies, as taxpayers, to fully comply with their tax obligations and refrain fromstop any forms of aggressive tax planning leading to BEPS, and to consider fair taxation strategy as an important part of their corporate social responsibilityto recognise their business is enabled by tax-funded social, legal and physical infrastructure and public services, and to embrace fair taxation strategy as an important part of their corporate social responsibility; reminds them that rising inequality and the gap between the wealthy and corporate elites is undermining the cohesion of societies and faith in democratic politics;
Amendment 149 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Urges Member States to review and update bilateral taxation agreements between Member States and with third countries to close loopholes that incentivise tax-driven trading practices with the purpose of tax avoidance;
Amendment 156 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that taxes must be paid in the jurisdictions where the actual economic activity and value creation takes place or, in case of indirect taxation, where consumption takes place; especially since it is required to fund the public services that the corporations themselves depend on;
Amendment 157 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Deplores the drop in nominal corporate tax rates all over Europe in recent years and the proliferation of incentives to lower the effective tax rate (ETR) compared to the statutory corporate tax rate; notes with concern that, regarding effective tax rates in the EU, in addition to Luxembourg (2.2%), the lowest ETRs are to be found in Hungary (7.5%), Bulgaria (9.5%), Cyprus (9.6%) as well as in the Netherlands (10.4%) and Latvia (10.6%) and that most countries appear to tax MNEs regressively: the larger the MNE, the lower the ETR;
Amendment 159 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Acknowledges the harmful consequences that tax competition between jurisdictions and the resulting "race to the bottom" have on public revenues and the progressivity of taxation; underlines that the further lowering of corporate taxes will eventually put the sustainability of the Union's public finances at stake; calls on the European Commission to propose a Directive that ensures minimum effective corporate tax rates of at least 20% in the European Union;
Amendment 173 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Acknowledges that special tax and deduction regimes, including those in non-EU countries like Switzerland, bear substantial responsibility for the global downward spiral of corporate taxes rates; notes that the effective tax rate is much lower than nominal rates in most EU countries, and important disparities and pressure on lower tax rates lead to a race to the bottom;
Amendment 175 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16 b. Regrets that profit shifting is often used by companies to put pressure on governments and employees, demanding weaker regulation and labour standards with the excuse of low profit margins, even though the company is operating successfully;
Amendment 192 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Acknowledges that the G20/OECD- led BEPS project was meant to tackle in a coordinated manner the causes and circumstances creating BEPS practices, by improving the coherence of tax rules across borders, reinforcing substance requirements and enhancing transparency and certainty; regrets that OECD BEPS Action Plan concerns only tax base competition and does not address tax rate competition;
Amendment 196 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Notes that the G20/OECD 15-point BEPS action plan is being implemented and monitored and further discussions are taking place, in a broader context than just the initial participating countries, through the Inclusive Framework; notes with regret however that BEPS so far failed to deliver on the most effective solution against the base erosion and profit shifting, deplores the fact that OECD still remain rather an exclusive club of countries rather that an open global platform that could keep up with the pace and deliver the solutions to minimise the negative impacts and risks of globalisation; calls on Member States to support a reform of both the mandate and the functioning of the Inclusive Framework to ensure that remaining tax loopholes and unsolved tax questions such as the allocation of taxing rights among countries are covered by the current international framework to combat BEPS practices;
Amendment 204 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Points out that some countries have recently adopted unilateral countermeasures against harmful tax practices (such as the UK’s Diverted Profits Tax and the Global Intangible Low- Taxed Income (GILTI) provisions of the US tax reform) to ensure that the foreign income of MNEs is duly taxed at a minimum effective tax rate in the parent’s country of residence; calls for an EU assessment of these measures and a legislative proposal, if appropriate, considering the negative potential tax base and strategic spillovers the US reform can have on the EU;
Amendment 225 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Reiterates its call for a clear definition of permanent establishment, including the concept of a ‘significant digital presence’, so that companies cannot artificially avoid having a taxable presence in a Member State in which they have economic activity;
Amendment 239 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Emphasises that the EU actions aimed at addressing BEPS and ATP have equipped tax authorities with an updated toolbox to ensure fair tax collection; stresses that tax authorities should be responsible for making effective use of the tools without imposing an additional significant burden on responsible taxpayers, particularly SMEs;
Amendment 245 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Recognises that the new flow of information to tax authorities following the adoption of ATAD I and DAC4 creates the need for adequate resources to ensure the most efficient use of such information and to effectively reduce the current tax gap; notes that there are continuing loopholes in the DAC regime that need to be closed1; __________________________ [1] Greens/EFA Report Reporting taxation: Analysing loopholes in the EU’s automatic exchange of information and how to close them, October 15 2018
Amendment 247 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28 a. Is concerned by the trend amongst some Member States of facilitating onshoring of IP from low tax Third Countries to EU Member States, through the provision of amortisation relief on IP acquirement, the proliferation of ‘patent boxes’ providing reduced taxation rates on certain IP profits, high or complete capital allowances for intellectual property and the introduction or extension of research and development credits1; notes that this while may conform with the BEPS actions’ substance requirements, it is in contrast with the spirit of BEPS; reiterates concerns expressed by the European Parliament2 and European Commission in relation to revenue losses associated with such measures3; _______________________ [1] Eurodad et. al., Tax Games: the Race to the Bottom, Europe’s role in supporting an unjust tax system 2017, December 2017, pp. 22 – 24; and IMF, Fiscal Monitor: Acting Now, Acting Together, April 2016, p 44. [2] European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2015 on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect, OJ C 366, 27.10.2017, p. 26, paragraph 117. [3] European Commission, DG TAXUD, Tax Policies in the European Union. 2016 Survey, 26 October 2016, 2.1.3 R&D tax incentives, p 2.
Amendment 250 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 c (new)
Paragraph 28 c (new)
28 c. Calls on EU Institutions and Member States to support a global tax reform based on the principles of formulary apportionment as included in the CCCTB proposal;
Amendment 254 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Welcomes the fact that Member States’ tax systems and overall tax environment have become part of the European Semester in line with Parliament’s call to that effect29 ; welcomes the studies and data drawn up by the Commission30 that allow situations that provide economic ATP indicators to be better addressed, and give a clear indication of the exposure to tax planning as well as furnishing a rich data base for all Member States on the phenomenon; calls on the Commission to make full use of this information and give concerned countries precise recommendations in its Specific Country Recommendations’ (SCRs) reports; urges Member States to swiftly follow the Commission's recommendations to fight ATP; _________________ 29 European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2015 on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect, OJ C 366, 27.10.2017, p. 51, paragraph 96. 30 Referred to above. The studies provide an overview of Member States’ exposure to ATP structures affecting their tax base (erosion or increase), although there is no stand-alone indicator of the phenomenon, a set of indicators seen as a ‘body of evidence’ nevertheless exists.
Amendment 268 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Calls on the Commission to issue a proposal aimed at repealoutlawing patent boxes, and calls on Member States to favour non- harmful and, if appropriate, direct support for R&D; reiterates, in the meantime, its call to ensure that current patent boxes establish a genuine link to economic activity, such as expenditure tests, and that they do not distort competition; welcomes the improved definition of R&D costs in the common corporate tax base (CCTB) proposal;
Amendment 269 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32 a. Calls on both the EU institutions and Member States to ensure public procurement contracts do not facilitate tax avoidance or benefit ATP by suppliers. Member States should monitor and ensure that companies or other legal entities involved in tenders and procurement contracts do not participate in tax evasion and avoidance by interacting with financial intermediaries established in offshore centres and tax havens, or by facilitating illicit capital flows, and to increase their transparency policies by requiring annual public country-by-country reporting, tracing beneficial ownership and controlling transfer pricing in order to ensure the transparencyof investments and prevent tax evasion and tax avoidance; calls on the Commission to clarify existing procurement practice under the EU procurement directive, and if necessary, propose an update to it that does not prohibit the application of tax related considerations as criteria for exclusion or even as selection criteria in public procurement1. ______________ [1] Initiatives such as www.tenderhaven.eu have attempted to introduce more transparency.
Amendment 286 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Welcomes the re-launch of the CCCTB project in a two-step approach, with the Commission’s adoption of interconnected proposals on CCTB and CCCTB; calls on the Council to swiftly adopt them, taking into consideration Parliament’s opinion that already includes the concept of virtual permanent establishment that would close the remaining loopholes allowing tax avoidance to take place and level the playing field in light of digitalisationdeplores the continued refusal of certain Member States to support this proposal and the failure of EU solidarity that this refusal represents;
Amendment 289 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33 a. Urges the Council to adopt these legislative proposals as soon as possible and before the end of this legislature, taking into consideration Parliament’s opinion that already includes the concept of virtual permanent establishment; considers that the deployment of this legislation would significantly contribute to closing the remaining loopholes and level the playing field in light of digitalisation and the growing role of intangible assets in the MNE value chain, which have exacerbated the problems with transfer pricing systems; however, expresses concern about the inclusion of a super-deduction for research and development1; ________________ [1] Council of the European Union, Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee, ECO/419,5.4 (http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/docu ment/ST-12848-2017-INIT/EN/pdf)
Amendment 315 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Welcomes the digital tax package adopted by the Commission on 21 March 2018; calls on the Council to swiftly adopt these proposalsdeplores the slow approach by the Council and its inability to come to an agreement on this package yet; points out that this already led to the distortion of the Single Market as national solutions have been put in place in different Member States and warns that the distortion risks worsening as other Member States consider to put in place national digital taxes; calls on the Council to adopt these proposals as soon as possible and before the end of this legislature, taking into account Parliament’s opinion on them;
Amendment 320 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35 a. Recalls that the digital services under the scope of the digital tax package should be the processing and sale of data, online advertisement, digital interfaces and the provision of digital content; deplores that the Council is currently considering a proposal that is much less ambitious in scope than the Commission’s proposal and than the Parliament’s position;
Amendment 328 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Understands that the so-called interim solution is not optimal; believnotes that it will help speed up the search for a better solution at global level, while levelling the playing field in local markets to some extent and preventing further distortion of EU Single Market; insists on the need to take a more optimal and long-term approach by adopting the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Basis (CCCTB) with a digital factor in the formula apportionment, as voted by the Parliament in March 2018, together with the new definition of a Significant Digital Presence (SDP); strongly believes that it is the best way to tackle tax evasion of digital multinationals and deplores that these files are not progressing in the Council;
Amendment 335 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Reiterates its call on the Commission to use the power vested in the article 116 TFEU and to make proposals in the area of taxation under this article, in particular for the adoption of the Digital Services Tax (DST) and the CCCTB; believes that the conditions set out in Article 116 are met since there is a clear evidence that competition in the internal market between digital and traditional firms is distorted and that the Council failed to come to an agreement to eliminate the distortion;
Amendment 347 #
2018/2121(INI)
38a. Calls on the Commission to tackle existing loopholes in automatic exchange of information, particularly coming from the DAC3 revision; stresses in this regard that this should cover national rulings and rulings with natural persons, that information should be made public, and that information on rulings should be better exchanged with third countries;
Amendment 350 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Reiterates, furthermore, its call to ensure simultaneous tax audits of persons of common or complementary interests (including parent companies and their subsidiaries), and its calcalls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal to further enhance tax cooperation between Member States through an obligation to answer group requests on tax matters;
Amendment 355 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Emphasises that not only information exchanges between, but also the sharing of best practices among tax authorities contribute to more efficient tax collection; calls on the Commission and the Member States to give priority to the sharing of best practices among tax authorities;
Amendment 360 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Welcomes the automatic exchange of financial account information based on the global standard which has been developed by the OECD with Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino and Switzerland; calls on the Commission and the Member States to upgrade the Treaty provisions so as to match the DAC as amended; regrets that Andorra, Liechtenstein, San Marino and Switzerland are moving from secrecy jurisdictions to low taxation jurisdictions, and still have harmful regimes according to the Council assessment on the EU list;
Amendment 370 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44 a (new)
Paragraph 44 a (new)
Amendment 378 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44 b (new)
Paragraph 44 b (new)
44b. Calls on the Commission to assess the state of play of all potentially harmful taxation agreements and any possible loophole in the EU rules on common taxation of parent companies and their subsidiaries, to come up with new upgraded policy measures to tackle dividend arbitrage practices and to take the necessary steps to prevent traders from exploiting loopholes in the law;
Amendment 383 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44 c (new)
Paragraph 44 c (new)
44c. Calls on the Commission to make a proposal to strengthen the DAC6 in order to require the mandatory disclosure of dividend arbitrage schemes and all information on capital gains, including the granting of dividend and capital gains tax refunds;
Amendment 398 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
Paragraph 45
45. Stresses that the proposal for public CBCR was submitted to the co-legislators just after the Panama papers scandal on 12 April 2016, and that Parliament adopted its position on it on 4 July 2017; recalls that the latter called for an enlargement of the scope of reporting and protection of commercially sensitive information; deplores the lack of progress and cooperation from the Council since 2016; urges for progress to be made in the Council so that it enters immediately into negotiations with Parliament as soon as possible and find agreement before the end of this legislature;
Amendment 406 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Notes that transparency is still lacking in numerous areas of taxation in the EU not limited to the corporate taxation; calls on the Commission and on Member States to collect and publish data on non-doms and CBI/RBI schemes; calls on the Commission to present a proposal to make the publication of tax rulings mandatory;
Amendment 408 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 b (new)
Paragraph 45 b (new)
45b. Calls on the Commission to issue a proposal that would oblige Member States to ensure that economic operators participating in public procurement procedures comply with a minimum level of transparency regarding tax, particularly public CBCR and transparent ownership structures;
Amendment 409 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 c (new)
Paragraph 45 c (new)
45c. Reminds Member States of the legal base of the proposal for public CBCR as found in the impact assessment of the Commission published 12 April 2016; recalls that the measures on corporate tax transparency cannot be regarded as relating to fiscal provisions affecting the establishment or functioning of the internal market in the sense of Article 115 TFEU;
Amendment 413 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
Paragraph 47
47. Calls on the Commission to assess possible measures to discourage Member States from granting such State aid in the form of a tax advantage, and to develop a robust method for measuring such indirect state aid;
Amendment 419 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 a (new)
Paragraph 48 a (new)
48a. Is concerned by the lack of transparency of tax rulings and notes that the tax rulings investigated by the Commission were only available to them because of revelations by investigative journalists, civil society organisations and trade unions.
Amendment 424 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
49. Notes that despite the fact that the Commission found McDonald’s benefited from double non-taxation on certain of its profits in the EU, no decision under EU State Aid rules could be issued, as the Commission concluded that the double non-taxation stemmed from a mismatch between Luxembourg and US tax laws and the Luxembourg-United States double taxation treaty38 ; calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal to harmonise double taxation treaties of Member States and terminate existing mismatches in the qualification of profits and expenses; _________________ 38 http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP- 18-5831_en.htm
Amendment 433 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
Paragraph 51
51. Reiterates its calls to the European Commission for guidelines clarifying what constitutes tax-related State aid and ‘appropriate’ transfer pricing, with a view to removing legal uncertainties for both compliant taxpayers and tax administrations, and providing a framework for Member States’ tax practices accordingly;
Amendment 436 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51 a (new)
Paragraph 51 a (new)
51a. Points out that the scope of state aide cases proves the urgent need to for a systemic change and approval of EU-wide reforms to curb tax avoidance including mandatory public Country-by-Country Reporting, Common Corporate Tax Base and Common Consolidate Corporate Tax Base or digital taxation; calls for a reform of the European State Aid framework in order to make tackling tax avoidance schemes between multinationals and Member States faster and more effective;
Amendment 441 #
Amendment 445 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
Paragraph 52
52. Notes that there is no single definition of letterbox companiesshell companies; notes, however, that they are characterised by the absence of real economic activity in the Member State of registration, and are a means for treaty abuse or treaty shopping, usually used with the purpose of circumventing labour laws and social contributions, aggressive tax planning and tax evasion, money laundering and/or terrorist financing;
Amendment 448 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52 a (new)
Paragraph 52 a (new)
52a. Notes that shell companies offer anonymity to its ultimate beneficiaries and allow them to abuse tax treaties; notes in this regard that the central register on the beneficial ownership foreseen in AMLD4 covers shell companies but regrets that the threshold for disclosure (25% of shareholding) will not prevent owners from remaining hidden; highlights that shell companies can be used as a vehicle for money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance; calls on the Commission to propose an amendment to the AMLD5 requiring obliged entities to file a suspicious transaction report whenever they enter into business or help setting up a shell company;
Amendment 452 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53
Paragraph 53
53. Points out national measures to specifically ban commercial relationships with letterboxshell companies; highlights, in particular, the Latvian legislation which defines a letterboxshell company as an entity having no actual economic activity and holding no documentary proof to the contrary, as being registered in a jurisdiction where companies are not required to submit financial statements, and/or as having no place of business in its country of residence;
Amendment 454 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53 a (new)
Paragraph 53 a (new)
53a. Notes that Latvia adopted in May 2018 a law banning financial institutions, as well as intermediaries, from cooperating and doing business with shell companies; calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal to introduce the Latvian legislation in EU legislation and to encourage all EU Member States to follow this example;
Amendment 468 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55
Paragraph 55
55. Underlines that a high share of foreign direct investment held by special purpose entities (SPEs) exists in several Member States, particularly in Malta, Luxembourg and the Netherlands;41 highlights that foreign direct investments through SPEs can be considerably affected by small legislative changes, whether domestically or abroad, affecting tax revenues and financial stability of the concerned countries and of the EU as a whole; _________________ 41 Kiendl Kristo I. and Thirion E., op. cit., p.23.
Amendment 486 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
Paragraph 58
58. Urges the Commission and the Member States to establish coordinated, binding, enforceable and substantial economic activity requirements as well as expenditure tests;
Amendment 490 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 59
Paragraph 59
59. Calls on the Commission to carry out, within two years, fitness checks of the interconnected legislative and policy initiatives aimed at addressing the use of letterboxshell companies in the context of tax fraud, tax evasion, aggressive tax planning and money laundering; calls on the Commission to make a proposal to ban shell companies in the EU, regarding that their use is associated with aggressive tax planning indicators;
Amendment 495 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 59 a (new)
Paragraph 59 a (new)
Amendment 502 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
Paragraph 61
61. Regrets, however, that every year, large amounts of the expected VAT revenue are lost because of fraud; highlights that according to the Commission’s statistics, the VAT gap in 2016 amounted to EUR 147 billion, which represents more than 12 % of the total expected VAT revenue43 ; notes that the Commission estimates that around EUR 50 billion – or EUR 100 per EU citizen each year – is lost to cross-border VAT fraud44 ; while the Europol estimates around 60 billion EUR of the VAT gap is connected to VAT fraud, partly used also organised crime and terrorism financing; _________________ 43 Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States: 2018 Final Report / TAXUD/2015/CC/131. 44 See Commission press release: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17- 3443_en.htm
Amendment 504 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61 a (new)
Paragraph 61 a (new)
61a. Highlights with concern that the VAT gap in 2016 amounted to EUR 147 billion; notes that the Commission estimates that around EUR 50 billion each year is lost to cross-border VAT fraud and that the proceeds from criminal activity in the EU are estimated to amount to EUR 110 billion per year; notes that the UNODC estimates that between 2 and 5% of global GDP is laundered each year;
Amendment 506 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
Paragraph 62
62. Calls for additional statistics to estimate the VAT gap; stresses that there is no common approach to data collection and sharing within the EU; urges the Commission to ensure that harmonised statistics are collected and published regularly in Member States;
Amendment 510 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 63
Paragraph 63
63. Underlines that the feature of the current VAT (transitional) regime of applying an exemption to intracommunity supplies and exports within the EU has been abused by fraudsters, in particular in the VAT carousel fraud; stresses that cash transactions still remain a very high risk regarding VAT fraud;
Amendment 535 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 70 a (new)
Paragraph 70 a (new)
70a. Regards with concern the Council's adoption of a Proposal to amend the common system of value added tax as regards the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism (GRCM) in relation to supplies of goods and services above a certain threshold of 2 October 2018, which allows for a GRCM with much weaker criteria than those approved by the European Parliament; acknowledges that a generalised application of the RCM shifts the tax liability to the retail stage, transforming the VAT system into a Sales Tax, jeopardising the in-built faithful reporting incentives of the VAT fractional payments system by concentrating the risk of fraud at the end of the value chain; notes that this creates risks for other types of fraud to arise, through underreporting of sales volumes and the exploitation of the variability of VAT rates across Member States, and that VAT fraud can be passed on to neighbouring countries, creating market disruptions in those borders where some Member States apply GRCM and others do not; calls on the Commission to closely monitor the application and consequences of this new legislation;
Amendment 560 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 76
Paragraph 76
76. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that EPPO towill begin operating as soon as possible and by 2022 at the latest; calls for exemplary sanctions to be pronounced; considers that anyone engaged in an organised VAT fraud scheme should be severely sanctioned in order to avoid a perception of impunity;
Amendment 568 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78 a (new)
Paragraph 78 a (new)
78a. Highlights the importance of the implementation of a register of beneficial owners as an important tool to tackle VAT fraud; stresses the need and calls on Member States to create specialised units of police and tax services as well as to appoint specialised prosecutors and judges to deal with this type of fraud;
Amendment 583 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 81
Paragraph 81
81. Emphasises that natural persons do not generally exercise their freedom of movement for the purposes of tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning; underlines, however, that some natural persons have a tax base large enough to span several tax jurisdictions; with high income and/or high wealth use inconsistent definitions of tax residence, special regimes and insufficient enforcement within or beyond the EU to achieve double non-taxation of their income
Amendment 588 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82
Paragraph 82
82. Regrets that even without shifting tax residence high net worth individuals (HNWI) and ultra HNWI (UHNWI) continue to have the possibility to shift their earnings and funds or their purchases through different tax jurisdictions to obtain substantially reduced or zero liability by using the services of wealth managers and other intermediaries; deplores that some EU Member States have implemented tax schemed to attract high net worth individuals and create space for double non-taxation;
Amendment 592 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83
Paragraph 83
83. Notes with regret that corporate tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax planning contribute to shifting the tax burden on to honest and fair taxpayers, undermining the social contract and requiring law-abiding citizens to contribute a higher proportion of their earnings to the exchequer, as well as increasing inequality between those benefiting from the schemes and those who do not;
Amendment 594 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83 a (new)
Paragraph 83 a (new)
83a. Notes that the threat of tax evasion and avoidance has created a race to the bottom regarding taxation of wealth, inheritance and capital incomes visible in the fact that – even without all the loopholes and avoidance strategies – the headline rates for labour income are usually higher than for effortless income from wealth and capital throughout the EU;
Amendment 595 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83 b (new)
Paragraph 83 b (new)
83b. Recognizes that low top marginal rates, whether on labour income or on capital income, incentivise certain behaviour from Chief Executive Officers that result in poorer corporate economic governance and increased income inequality;
Amendment 601 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 84
Paragraph 84
84. Deplores the fact that some Member States, such as Portugal, have created tax regimes allowing non-nationals to obtain income tax benefits, hereby undermining other Member States’ tax base and fostering harmful policies which discriminate against their own citizens; these regimes offer benefits such as such as non-taxation of foreign possessions and income, lump-sum tax on foreign income, tax-free allowances on a part of incomes earn in the country, lower tax rate on pensions remitted to the country;
Amendment 605 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 84 a (new)
Paragraph 84 a (new)
84a. Reminds that the Commission in its communication of 2001 suggested to include special regimes for expatriates in its list of harmful tax practices1 but has not provided any data on the scope of the problem since; calls on the Commission to reactivate its work on this issue and to start by collecting information on the users and costs of existing regimes, including the costs of double non-taxation of cross-border capital income that is usually ignored by cost estimates of national tax agencies. __________________ [1] COM (2001) 260: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee Tax policy in the European Union - Priorities for the years ahead (https://eur- lex.europa.eu/procedure/EN/164839)
Amendment 615 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 85
Paragraph 85
85. Observes that a majority of Member States have adopted citizenship by investment (CBI) or residency by investment (RBI) schemes57 , generally known as visa or investor programmes, by which citizenship or residence is granted to non-EU citizens, whether they are from EU or non-EU countries, in exchange for financial investment; observes that these programmes do not necessarily require applicants to spend time on the territory in which the investment is made; _________________ 57 18 Member States have some form of RBI scheme in place, including four Member States that operate CBI schemes in addition to RBI schemes: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Malta, Romania. 10 Member States have no such schemes: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden. Source: study entitled ‘Citizenship by investment (CBI) and residency by investment (RBI) schemes in the EU‘, EPRS, October 2018, PE: 627.128; ISBN: 978-92-846-3375-3.
Amendment 623 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86 a (new)
Paragraph 86 a (new)
86a. Notes that Citizenship by investment and residency by investment schemes in Member States such as Latvia, Austria or the UK have been used by a significant number of actors originating from Russia and countries under Russian influence; deplores that the secrecy surrounding these money flows has significantly increased the political, economic and security risks for European countries, particularly the risks of money laundering.
Amendment 624 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86 b (new)
Paragraph 86 b (new)
86b. Notes that CBI and RBI schemes offered by third countries might pose EU security risks regarding visa issuing, and may increase the potential for tax evasion; highlights that, according to the OECD, CBI and RBI schemes are even more problematic when implemented by low or no-taxation jurisdiction and when no minimum presence is required;
Amendment 631 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 87
Paragraph 87
87. Stresses that CBI and RBI schemes carry significant risks, including a devaluation of EU citizenship and the potential for corruption, money laundering and tax evasion as well as security risks; reiterates its concern that citizenship or residence could be granted through these schemes without proper or indeed any customer due diligence (CDD) having been carried out by competent authorities; notes that the obligations contained in AMLD5 subjecting obliged entities to consider CBI or RBI applicants as a high-risk factor in the course of their due diligence process do not mitigate the risks associated with the schemes and should not constitute a way to absolve Member States from their responsibility to establish, abide by and monitor enhanced due diligence standards; notes that several formal investigations into corruption and money laundering have been launched at national and EU level directly related to CBI and RBI schemes; underlines that, at the same time, the economic sustainability and viability of the investments provided through these schemes remain uncertain; notes that one Member State’s decision to implement CBI and RBI schemes have spillover effects on other EU Member States;
Amendment 640 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 88 a (new)
Paragraph 88 a (new)
88a. Deplores that the financial benefits of such schemes accrue to a limited number of Member States whereas the potential costs of providing services to those who buy them may be borne by other states, creating an injustice across the Union;
Amendment 643 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 89
Paragraph 89
89. Worries that there is very little transparency in relation to the number and origin of applicants, the numbers of individuals granted citizenship or residency by these schemes and the amount invested through these schemes; appreciates the fact that somenotes that only a minority of Member States make explicit the name and nationalities of the individuals who are granted citizenship or residency under these schemes; calls on the Member States implementing these schemes to publish and share with other EU countries the names of all applicants, or at least the names of the politically exposed persons;
Amendment 653 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90
Paragraph 90
90. Is concerned that according to the OECD, CBI and RBI schemes could be misused to undermine the common reporting standard (CRS) due diligence procedures, leading to inaccurate or incomplete reporting under the CRS, in particular when not all jurisdictions of tax residence are disclosed to the financial institution; notes that in the OECD’s view, the visa schemes which are potentially high-risk for the integrity of the CRS are those that give a taxpayer access to a low personal income tax rate of less than 10 % on offshore financial assets, and do not require a significant physical presence of at least 90 days in the jurisdiction offering the golden visa scheme; is concerned that Malta and Cyprus have schemes59 among those that potentially pose a high risk to the integrity of CRS; notes with concern that Member States that offer this kind of schemes and refuse at the same time to receive information from other non-EU Member States via CRS create a loophole in automatic exchange of information systems; _________________ 59 The Cypriot Citizenship by Investment: Scheme for Naturalisation of Investors by Exception, the Cypriot Residence by Investment, the Maltese Individual Investor Programme, and the Maltese Residence and Visa programme.
Amendment 659 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 91
Paragraph 91
91. Concludes that the potential economic benefits of CBI and RBI schemes do not offset the serious money laundering and tax evasion risks they present; calls on Member States to phase out allban existing CBI or RBI schemes as soon as possible; stresses that, in the meantime, Member States should properly ensure that enhanced CDD on applicants for citizenship or residence through these schemes is duly carried out, as required by AMLD5nd monitored by competent authorities; and urges the Commission to identify legislative instruments to set and impose EU – wide harmonised standards of these schemes; calls on Member States to ensure that competent authorities bear the ultimate responsibility for assessing due diligence findings and decision-making, and make explicit the name and the nationalities of the individuals who are granted citizenship or residency under these schemes; calls on the Commission to monitor rigorously and continuously the proper implementation and application of CDD within the framework of CBI and RBI schemes until they are repealed in each Member State and start infringement procedures;
Amendment 667 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 92
Paragraph 92
92. Calls on Member States to prevent conflicts of interest linked to CBI and RBI schemes, which might arise when private firms which assisted the government in the design, management and promotion of these schemes, also advised and supported individuals by screening them for suitability and filing their applications for citizenship or residence; calls on Member States to require physical presence in the country as a condition for benefiting from CBI and RBI schemes before the phase out;
Amendment 675 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 93
Paragraph 93
93. Urges the Commission to finalise its study on CBI and RBI schemes in the Union; urges the Commission to examine whether, and, if so, which of these schemes posed a threat to EU legislation; calls on the Commission to assess the risks associated with the selling of citizenship and residence as part of its next Supranational Risk Assessment; urges the Commission to also assess the risks associated with the adoption of visa- waiver agreements with third countries that have CBI or RBI schemes in place; calls on the Commission to expand the scope of obliged entities covered by AMLD5 to include all agents or firms acting as intermediaries in the trade of citizenship and residency or acting as advisors in residence and citizenship planning; calls on the Commission to establish mechanisms for coordinating information sharing between Member States on rejected applications; calls on the Commission to assess the extent to which these schemes have been used by EU citizens;
Amendment 686 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 95
Paragraph 95
95. Notes that free ports within the EU can be established under the ‘free zone’ procedure; notes that free zones are enclosed areas within the customs territory of the Union where non-Union goods can be introduced free of import duty, other charges (i.e. taxes) and commercial policy measures; highlights with concern that free ports can be also used for the purpose of tax evasion;
Amendment 694 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 97
Paragraph 97
97. Notes that, apart from secure storage, the motivations for the use of free ports include a high degree of secrecy and the deferral of import duties and indirect taxes such as VAT or user tax; recognizes that the purpose of free ports is not to constitute a place for the safe and tax-free storage of value for the wealth of individuals while it has been found that they are frequently used as such;
Amendment 697 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99
Paragraph 99
99. Observes that under the Union Customs Code, customs warehouses are on an almost identical legal footing with free ports; recommends, therefore, they be put on an equal footing with free ports under legal measures aimed at mitigating money laundering and tax evasion risks therein, such as AMLD5; considers that warehouses should be equipped with the adequate staff to be able to undertake the necessary scrutiny of the operations that they host;
Amendment 700 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 101
Paragraph 101
101. Notes that under DAC5, as of 1 January 2018, direct tax authorities have ‘access upon request’ to a broad information set with regard to ultimate beneficial ownership (UBO) information collected under the AMLD; notes that EU AML legislation is built on the trust in reliable CDD research and the diligent reporting of suspicious transactions by obliged entities, which will become AML gatekeepers; notes with concern that ‘access upon request’ to information held by free ports may only have very limited effect in specific cases63 ; takes the view that direct tax offices should be able to fish into UBO data as part of their surveillance tasks; _________________ 63 EPRS study entitled ‘Money Laundering and tax evasion risks in free ports’, October 2018, PE: 627.114; ISBN: 978-92- 846-3333-3.
Amendment 710 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 102 a (new)
Paragraph 102 a (new)
102 a. Calls on the Commission to begin the process and propose concrete steps for the phasing out of the system of free ports in Europe;
Amendment 712 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 103
Paragraph 103
Amendment 715 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 103 a (new)
Paragraph 103 a (new)
103 a. Points out that tax amnesties represent a high risk of decreased tax compliance in the long run and a threat to the rule of law and the fight against money laundering;
Amendment 716 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 103 b (new)
Paragraph 103 b (new)
103 b. Calls on the Member States to refrain from further using tax amnesties as this measure only represents a source of quick tax collection in the short run while has a significantly negative impact on the overall tax systems;
Amendment 726 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 106 a (new)
Paragraph 106 a (new)
106 a. Call on Member States to do group requests and to harmonise the definition of tax crimes; call on the Commission to eliminate any obstacles in administrative and legal cooperation;
Amendment 727 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 106 b (new)
Paragraph 106 b (new)
106 b. Calls on the Commission to assess and presents proposals to close loopholes in the DAC2, particularly by including hard assets and cryptocurrencies in the scope of the directive, by prescribing sanctions for non-compliance or false reporting from financial institutions, as well as by including more types of financial institutions and types of accounts that are not being reported at the moment, such as pension funds;
Amendment 728 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 106 c (new)
Paragraph 106 c (new)
106 c. Considers that coordinated on-site inspections and joint audits should be part of the European framework of cooperation between tax administrations;
Amendment 737 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 108 a (new)
Paragraph 108 a (new)
108 a. Notes that, according to AMLD4, the Commission shall identify high risk third countries presenting strategic deficiencies in their regime on anti-money laundering and countering terrorist financing; welcomes in this regard the adoption by the Commission in June 2018 of the methodology for identifying high risk third countries; urges the Commission to publish first results as soon as possible, and acknowledges that, in the meantime, the Commission uses the list from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), however excluding Serbia, which is on the FATF list;
Amendment 741 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 109
Paragraph 109
109. Deplores the fact that a large number of Member States have failed to fully or partially transpose AMLD4 into their domestic legislation within the set deadline, and that for this reason, infringement procedures have had to be opened by the Commission against them, including referrals before the Court of Justice of the European Union67 ; calls on these Member States to swiftly remedy this situation; reminds Member States of their legal obligation to respect the deadline of 10 January 2020 for the transposition of AMLD5 into their domestic legislation; and calls on the Commission to ensure that the AMLD5 is transposed fully in a timely manner or to consider using the legal tool of a regulation instead; _________________ 67 On 19 July 2018, the Commission referred Greece and Romania to the Court of Justice of the European Union for failing to transpose the fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive into their national law. Ireland had transposed only a very limited part of the rules and was also referred to the Court of Justice. Moreover, on 8 November 2018, the Commission adopted a negative opinion on the Maltese Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit and required it to continue taking additional measures to fully comply with its obligations.
Amendment 746 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 110
Paragraph 110
110. Recalls the crucial importance of CDD as part of the know-your-customer (KYC) obligation which consists of obliged entities having to properly identify their customers and the source of their funds as well as the ultimate beneficial owners of the assets, including the immobilisation of anonymous accounts; notes that adequate resources within tax administrations are necessary for the effective implementation of this obligation;
Amendment 758 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112
Paragraph 112
112. Recalls that KYC and CDD continues throughout the business relationship, and that customers’ transactions have to be monitored for suspicious or unusual activities; recalls, in this context, the obligation for obliged entities to promptly inform national FIUs, on their own initiative, of transactions suspected of ML, associate predicate offences or terrorist financing; is concerned that AMLD5 continues to allow for managing directors to be registered as beneficial owners while the real beneficial owner of a company or trust is not known; calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal to end the practice of accepting the ultimate beneficial owners to hide behind straw men and to urge other jurisdictions at international level to do the same; calls on the Member States when transposing AMLD5 into national law to ensure that obliged entities terminate the business relationship with another company whose ultimate beneficial owners are not known;
Amendment 782 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 116 a (new)
Paragraph 116 a (new)
116 a. Is aware that the 500 euro note, the issuing of which has been abandoned by the ECB, continues to be used for money laundering and criminal activities; notes that some Member States are considering banning it; recalls that for such a measure to be effective the ban needs to be extended to all countries where the euro is accepted as a currency;
Amendment 791 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 117
Paragraph 117
117. Is aware that the current AML legal framework has so far consisted of directives and is based on minimum harmonisation, which has led to different national supervisory and enforcement practices in the Member States; calls on the Commission to assess, in the context of a future revision of the AML legislation, in the required impact assessment, whether a regulation would be a more appropriate legal act than a directive; calls, in this context, for a swift transformation into a regulation of the AML legislation if the impact assessment so advises; calls on the Commission to make, in the meantime, full use of the instruments at hand to enforce AML legislation in the Member States, starting with formal opinions and ending with infringement procedures or to consider the legal tool of a regulation instead;
Amendment 796 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 117 a (new)
Paragraph 117 a (new)
117 a. Deplores cases such as the Russian Laundromat, the Danske Banks case, the ABLV case and the Azerbaijan Laundromat that have demonstrated how hundreds of billions of euros of dirty Russian money connected to Russian ruling elites and oligarchs have been laundered via EU banks and offshore jurisdictions;
Amendment 799 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 117 b (new)
Paragraph 117 b (new)
117 b. Notes with concern that undetected flow of Russian money to Europe can create political, economic and security risks that have become clearly visible in cases such as the Salisbury attacks or the case of Cambridge Analytica and other interference in the democratic process in Europe;
Amendment 800 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 117 c (new)
Paragraph 117 c (new)
117 c. Calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that the issues of money laundering and illicit financial flows are given an adequate degree of attention in EU sanction programmes in order to cut oligarchs off from their funds; calls for an EU wide Magnitsky Act to freeze assets of human rights violators; considers that it is time to end the free flow of money from Russia to EU banks; calls on the European Commission to explore the option of reversing the burden of proof so that Russian-origin money is considered suspect until proven otherwise;
Amendment 805 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 121
Paragraph 121
121. Concludes that the current level of coordination of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) supervision of financial institutions, particularly in AML/CFT situations with cross-border effects, is not sufficient to address current challenges in this sector and that the Union’s ability to enforce coordinated AML rules and practices is currently inadequate; acknowledges that smaller EU Member States have been targeted for money laundering as a result of their lack of capacity to police illegal flows adequately; calls therefore for a new centralised system at EU level for AML/CFT supervision, with proper resources; calls on the Commission to develop specialized trainings for FIUs, particularly with respect to capacities in smaller Member States;
Amendment 810 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 122
Paragraph 122
122. Calls for an assessment of long- term objectives leading to an enhanced AML/CFT framework as mentioned in the ‘Reflection Paper on possible elements of a Roadmap for seamless cooperation between Anti Money Laundering and Prudential Supervisors in the European Union’, such as the establishment at EU level of a mechanism to better coordinate the activities of AML/CFT supervisors of financial sector entities, notably in situations where AML/CFT concerns are likely to have cross-border effects, and a possible centralisation of AML supervision via an existing or new Union body empowered to enforce harmonised rules and practices in EU Member States;
Amendment 817 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 124
Paragraph 124
124. Stresses that ESAs, and in particular the EBA, should be provided with sufficient resource capacity to carry out their oversight functions and improve AML supervision; notes the recommendation to the Maltese FIAU of the EBA pointing to uncertainties in the current banking legislation preventing the EBA from taking further actions to effectively enforce the Union law and calls on Member States to swiftly transpose the recently adopted changes to the Capital Requirements Directive into national law;
Amendment 828 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 126
Paragraph 126
126. Recalls that pursuant to AMLD5 Member States are obliged to set up automated centralised mechanisms enabling swift identification of holders of bank and payment accounts, and to ensure that any FIU is able to provide information held in those centralised mechanisms to any other FIU in a timely manner; calls on the Member States to speed up the establishment of these mechanisms so that Member States’ FIUs are able to cooperate effectively with each other in order to detect and counteract money-laundering activities; recalls that EU FIUs are strongly encouraged to use the FIU.net system; highlights that information sharing between FIUs and Law Enforcement Agencies, including with Europol, should be improved;
Amendment 843 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 127
Paragraph 127
127. Highlights that in order to fight effectively against money laundering activities, cooperation is essential not only between Member States’ FIUs but also between Member States’ FIUs and the FIUs of third countries; calls on the Commission to engage actively with Member States to find mechanisms to improve and enhance the cooperation of Member States’ FIUs with the FIUs of third countries; calls on the Commission to take opportune action in this regard at the relevant international forums, such as the OECD and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF); considers that in any resulting agreement proper consideration should be given to the protection of personal data in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/680;
Amendment 850 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 128
Paragraph 128
128. Points out that the non- standardisation of suspicious transaction report formats and non-standardisation of suspicious transaction report thresholds among Member States and with respect to the different obliged entities leads to difficulties in the processing and exchange of information between FIUs; calls on the Commission to explore mechanisms to set up standardised reporting formats for obliged entities in order to facilitate the exchange of information between FIUs in cases with a cross-border dimension; and to reflect on the standardisation of suspicious transaction thresholds
Amendment 857 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 129 a (new)
Paragraph 129 a (new)
129 a. Considers the established swift information exchange by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) of the United States Department of the Treasury as a model for the EU and calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal to set up a European Financial Intelligence Unit (EFIU) to facilitate coordination, including the exchange of information between FIUs within the Union; considers that this EFIU shall coordinate, assist and support Member Sates FIUs in cross-border cases, shall lend support to those Member States especially in maintaining and developing the technical infrastructure for ensuring the exchange of information, assisting them in joint analysis of cross-border cases and strategic analysis, and shall coordinate the work of Member States FIUs for cross-border cases; requires the Commission to provide the EFIU with adequate financial, human and technical resources in order to fulfil its tasks;
Amendment 865 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 130
Paragraph 130
130. Welcomes the fact that AMLD5 has broadened the list of obliged entities to include providers engaged in exchange services between virtual currencies and fiat currencies, custodian wallet providers, art traders and free ports; calls on the Commission to further broaden the list of obliged entities to include agents and service providers engaged in the trade of citizenship and residency or acting as advisors in residence and citizenship planning;
Amendment 875 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 133
Paragraph 133
133. Notes that the Union’s AML legislation obliges Member States to establish central registers containing complete beneficial ownership data for companies and trusts, and that it also provides for their interconnection; welcomes the fact that AMLD5 obliges Member States to ensure that the information on beneficial ownership of companies is accessible in all cases to any member of the general public; deplores that the information on beneficial ownership of trusts is, as a general rule, subject to legitimate interest and calls, therefore, on Member States to make use of the option in AMLD5 to grant open access also to information on trusts, and calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal to amend AMLD5 to make open access to information of trusts compulsory; stresses that the interconnection of registers should be ensured by the Commission; considers that the Commission should closely monitor the functioning of this interconnected system and assess within a reasonable time whether it is working properly and whether it should be supplemented by the establishment of an EU public register of beneficial ownership;
Amendment 877 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 133
Paragraph 133
133. Notes that the Union’s AML legislation obliges Member States to establish central registers containing complete beneficial ownership data for companies and trusts, and that it also provides for their interconnection; welcomes the fact that AMLD5 obliges Member States to ensure that the information on beneficial ownership is accessible in all cases to any member of the general public; calls on Member States to establish freely accessible and open data registers; stresses that the interconnection of registers should be ensured by the Commission; calls on the Commission to develop and issue technical guidelines to facilitate convergence of format, interoperability and interconnection of Member States’ registers considers that the Commission should closely monitor the functioning of this interconnected system and assess within a reasonable time whether it is working properly and whether it should be supplemented by the establishment of an EU public register of beneficial ownership;
Amendment 883 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 133 a (new)
Paragraph 133 a (new)
133 a. Is concerned of the poor quality of the beneficial ownership information collected in the national registers and calls on the EBA to monitor the correctness of the information;
Amendment 889 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 136
Paragraph 136
136. Underscores the problem of money laundering through investment in real estate in European cities through foreign shell companies; recognises that these type of practices have serious externalities on house prices in local markets that negatively affect the access to affordable housing of the residents in those cities; recalls that the Commission should assess the necessity and proportionality of harmonising the information in the land and real estate registers and assess the need for the interconnection of those registers; calls on the Commission, if appropriate, to accompany the report with a legislative proposal; is concerned that money laundering is also done through life insurance contracts and financial instruments and is, therefore, of the opinion that beneficial ownership information on these assets should also be available to authorities; is of the opinion that also beneficial owner should be registered in real estate registers and not only mere legal owners possibly hiding the ultimate beneficial owner and calls on the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal to amend the AMLD5 in this regard;
Amendment 896 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 138
Paragraph 138
138. Underlines the positive potential of new distributed ledger technologies, such as blockchain technology; notes at the same time the increasing abuse of new payment and transfer methods based on these technologies to launder criminal proceeds, to evade taxes or to commit other financial crimes; acknowledges the need to monitor technological developments to ensure that legislation addresses in an effective manner the abuse of new technologies and anonymity, which facilitates criminal activity;
Amendment 903 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 138 a (new)
Paragraph 138 a (new)
138 a. Notes that because of the anonymity provided to users by virtual currencies, transactions cannot be monitored by authorities, increasing the risk of money laundering and tax evasion; stresses in this regard that virtual currencies can be used to circumvent the exchange of information system;
Amendment 905 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 138 b (new)
Paragraph 138 b (new)
138 b. Acknowledges that the decentralised aspect of virtual currencies and the lack of clear intermediaries complicates regulation activities; welcomes the fact that AMLD5 includes some virtual currencies’ actors; regrets however that some important actors are not covered by anti-money laundering rules, like cryptocurrency exchanges, trading platforms, or software or hardware wallets;
Amendment 906 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 138 c (new)
Paragraph 138 c (new)
138 c. Calls on the Commission to issue a proposal for a EU regulation of virtual currencies, including licensing requirements and uplifting anonymity;
Amendment 926 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 141
Paragraph 141
141. Recalls that EU AML legislation requires Member States to lay down sanctions for breaches of anti-money laundering rules; stresses that these sanctions must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive; recalls that EU AML legislation requires Member States to publish information and statistics on AML enforcement actions, and in particular that a decision imposing an administrative sanction or measure for breach of EU AML legislation shall be published by the competent authorities on their official website immediately after the person sanctioned is informed of that decision and that the publication shall include at least information on the type and nature of the breach and the identity of the persons responsible; urges Member States to also publish the nature and value of the sanctions imposed; calls on Member States to also apply sanctions and measures to the members of the management body and to other natural persons who under national law are responsible for a breach of anti-money laundering rules;
Amendment 935 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 145
Paragraph 145
145. Takes note of the Methodology for identifying high-risk third countries under Directive (EU) 2015/849 published on 22 June 2018 (SWD(2018)0362) and calls on the Commission to make the blacklisting process fully transparent to the public;
Amendment 947 #
2018/2121(INI)
147. Is worried about the accelerating corporate, dividend or capital gains tax race to the bottom worldwide in terms of nominal tax rate76 77 ; _________________ 76 The average corporate income tax rate across the OECD dropped from 32.5 % in 2000 to 23.9 % in 2018. Overall, 22 of the 38 countries surveyed in the latest tax policy reform 2018 report from the OECD now have combined statutory corporate income tax rates equal to or below 25 %, compared with only six in 2000. Source: OECD and Selected Partner Economies, Tax Policy Reforms 2018. 77 It is also worth noting that the EU 28 are already well below this level, with an average corporate income tax rate in 2018 of 21.9 %, down from 32 % in 2000, according to the Commission: Taxation Trends in the European Union - Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norward, 2018 Edition (page 36) and Taxation Trends in the European Union - Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norward, 2015 Edition (page 147).
Amendment 951 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 149
Paragraph 149
149. Calls on the Commission to conduct a mapping exercise to analyse the extent of reciprocity in the exchange of information between the US and Member States; calls on the Council to give a mandate to the Commission to negotiate an agreement with the US to ensure reciprocity in the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA); calls on the Commission and Council to consider sanctions, like withholding tax on payments of EU-source income or the introduction on the list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes, if the US does not ensure reciprocity in the FATCA;
Amendment 960 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 150
Paragraph 150
150. Recalls the importance of a common EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes (hereinafter ‘EU list’) based on comprehensive, transparent, robust, objectively verifiable and commonly accepted criteria that is regularly updated, accompanied by appropriate and dissuasive countermeasures;
Amendment 966 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 151
Paragraph 151
151. Welcomes the adoption by the Council of the first EU list on 5 December 2017 and the ongoing monitoring of the commitments made by third countries; is of the opinion that also EU countries should be included in the screening of non- cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes; notes that the list has been updated several times on the basis of the assessment of those commitments; underlineregrets that this assessment is based on criteria deriving from a technical scoreboard and that Parliament had no legal involvement in this process; calls in this context on the Commission and the Council to inform Parliament in detail ahead of any proposed change to the list; calls on the Council to publish a regular progress report regarding black- and grey-listed jurisdictions as part of the regular update from the CoC Group to the Council;
Amendment 978 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 152
Paragraph 152
152. Deeply regrets the lack of transparency during the initial listing process; welcomes, however, the improvement in transparency made by the disclosure of letters sent to jurisdictions screened by the CoC Group, as well as the set of commitment letters received; calls for all remaining undisclosed letters to be made publicly available to ensure scrutiny and proper implementation of commitments; recommends to put countries that refuse to disclose their commitment letter on the blacklist;
Amendment 980 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 152 a (new)
Paragraph 152 a (new)
152 a. Recommends that the blacklisting process be made by a panel of independent experts rather than by the CoC group, so as to increase the objectivity and transparency of the EU list and to make it free from any political interference; believes that a more transparent and objective EU list will improve the credibility of the EU in its fight against tax havens;
Amendment 983 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 153
Paragraph 153
153. Welcomes the recent clarifications from the CoC Group on fair taxation criteria, especially regarding the lack of economic substance for jurisdictions having no corporate income tax rate or a rate close to 0 %; calls on the Member States to work towards the gradual improvement of the EU listing criteria to cover all harmful tax practices79 , including criteria like the advantages given to non- residents or the transparency of the tax ruling system; _________________ 79 Work on fair taxation criteria 2.1 and 2.2 of Council conclusions 14166/16 of 8 November 2016.
Amendment 996 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 154 b (new)
Paragraph 154 b (new)
154 b. Notes that the negotiations between the EU and Switzerland on the revision of the bilateral approach to reciprocal market access are still ongoing; calls on the Commission to ensure that the final agreement between the EU and Switzerland contains a tax good governance clause including specific rules on State aid under the form of a tax advantage, transparency requirements regarding the automatic exchange of information on taxation and beneficial ownership as well as anti-money laundering provisions;
Amendment 998 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 154 a (new)
Paragraph 154 a (new)
154 a. Is concerned that Austrian residents who hold bank accounts with credit institutions in Liechtenstein are not affected by the Act on Common Reporting Standards if their capital incomes are yielded from asset structures (private foundations, establishments, trusts and the like), and the credit institution in Liechtenstein takes care of the taxation in accordance with bilateral treaties; calls on Austria to change its law in this regard so as to close the loophole of the CRS;
Amendment 1009 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 155 a (new)
Paragraph 155 a (new)
155 a. Calls for the setting up of dissuasive and EU-wide harmonised sanctions for the blacklisted countries; recommends that the coordinated denunciation by Member States of bilateral tax treaties with those countries be considered as one of the last resort sanctions;
Amendment 1014 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 156 a (new)
Paragraph 156 a (new)
156 a. Notes that sanctions and countermeasures are essential to fight against money laundering, tax evasion and tax avoidance; notes in this regard that the economic weight of the European Union is a strength and can be a deterrent for tax havens and non-cooperative jurisdictions that would politically and economically suffer from such sanctions;
Amendment 1018 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158
Paragraph 158
158. Reiterates its call for the EU to have a leading role in the global fight against tax evasion, aggressive tax planning and money laundering, in particular through Commission initiatives in all related international forums; considers that the EU should also lead by example, and calls on the Commission to ensure that those with a commercial or vested interest in promoting tax avoidance and tax evasion should not have a role in guiding or advising the EU's policy- making on these matters;
Amendment 1032 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 159 a (new)
Paragraph 159 a (new)
159 a. Calls on the Commission to take a leading role in the global debate and to urgently explore the ways for the pricing of digital assets; encourages the EU institutions to take the lead in the taxing of Tech Giants to speed up the work at OECD and UN levels; recalls, however, that the EU shall not wait for a global solution and shall immediately act;
Amendment 1033 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 159 b (new)
Paragraph 159 b (new)
159 b. Asks Member States to delegate to the Commission the power to renegotiate on their behalf the tax treaties with third countries, so as to integrate the new definition of a significant digital presence in a harmonised way once it is adopted at EU level; strongly believes it is essential in order to avoid creating any loopholes in the international tax environment;
Amendment 1037 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 160
Paragraph 160
160. Calls for a global summit on remaining necessarythe urgently needed fundamental global tax reforms in order to enhance tax revenue collection, ensure an equitable tax system, strengthen international cooperation and put pressure on all countries, in particular their financial centres, to comply with transparency and fair taxation standards; calls for the Commission to take the initiative for such a summit and for the summit to allow for the establishment of the abovementioned global tax body;
Amendment 1044 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 161
Paragraph 161
161. Believes that supporting developing countries in combating tax evasion and aggressive tax planning, as well as corruption and secrecy that facilitate illicit financial flows, is of the utmost importance for strengthening policy coherence for development in the EU and improving developing countries’ tax capacities and domestic resource mobilisationretain and mobilise their own resources for sustainable economic development;
Amendment 1050 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 161 a (new)
Paragraph 161 a (new)
161 a. Notes that the intensity of losses due to tax avoidance is substantially greater in low and middle-income countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and in South Asia compared to other regions1; notes furthermore that bilateral tax treaties signed by developing countries with developed countries negatively impact their tax revenues2; ____________________ [1] Cobham, A and Petr Janský (2017) Global Distribution of Revenue Loss from Tax Avoidance https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/fil es/wp2017-55.pdf [2] http://www.actionaid.org/publications/imp act-tax-treaties-revenue-collection-case- study-developing-and-least-developed
Amendment 1060 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 164
Paragraph 164
164. Welcomes the participation on an equal footing of all countries involved in the Inclusive Framework, which brings together over 115 countries and jurisdictions to collaborate on the implementation of the OECD/G20 BEPS Package; calls on the Member States to support a reform of both the mandate and functioning of the Inclusive Framework to ensure that developing countries’ interests are taken into consideration; recalls the exclusion of over 100 developing countries in negotiating the BEPS actions; recalls calls from the Group of 77 (G77) and developing countries for global reform and decision-making to take place within a global tax body under the auspices of the UN;
Amendment 1062 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 165
Paragraph 165
165. Recalls that public development aid should be directed to a greater extent towards the implementation of an appropriate regulatory framework and the bolstering of tax administrations and institutions responsible for fighting illicit financial flows; calls for this aid to be provided in the form of technical expertise in relation to resource management, financial information and anti-corruption rules; calls for this aid to also favour regional cooperation against tax fraud, tax evasion, aggressive tax planning and money laundering; stresses that this aid should include support to civil society and media in developing countries to ensure public scrutiny over domestic tax policies;
Amendment 1064 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 166
Paragraph 166
166. Expects the Commission to come up with adequate resources to implement the ‘Collect More – Spend Better’ approach, notably through its flagships programmes81 ; calls on the Commission to further develop the element of fairness of tax systems under the ‘Collect more’ pillar, focusing on progressive taxation in order to distribute tax contributions fairly and bridge economic and gender inequalities; _________________ 81 European Commission discussion paper: A Contribution to the Third Financing for Development Conference in Addis Ababa.
Amendment 1068 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 167
Paragraph 167
167. Recalls the need for fair treatment of developing countries when negotiating tax treaties, taking into account their particular situation and ensuring a fair allocation of tax rights according to genuine economic activity and value creation; calls, in this regard, for adherence to the UN model tax convention to be used as a minimum standard and for transparency around treaty negotiations to be ensured; acknowledges that the OECD model tax treaty grants more rights to the country of residence, favouring European and North-American multinational companies; calls on EU Member States to consider as well the Model Double Taxation Agreement developed by the African Tax Administration Forum (ATAF);
Amendment 1070 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 167 a (new)
Paragraph 167 a (new)
167 a. Calls on Member States to undertake spillover analyses when negotiating tax treaties with developing countries and when adopting its tax policies; urges the Commission to consider spillover effects of EU tax regulations, in line with the Policy Coherence for Development and produce an impact assessments of European tax policies on developing countries, in order to take better into account negative spillovers on developing countries and the special needs of those countries;
Amendment 1073 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 167 b (new)
Paragraph 167 b (new)
167 b. Notes the particular importance of transparency, including through public CBCR and public registers of beneficial owners, given the limited capacity of developing countries to meet requirements through existing exchange of information procedures; calls on the EU and its Member States to enforce the principle that listed or unlisted multinational companies of all countries and sectors, and especially those companies extracting natural resources, must adopt CBCR as a standard, requiring them to publish, as part of their annual reporting and on a country-by-country basis for each territory in which they operate, the names of all subsidiaries and their respective financial performance, relevant tax information, assets and number of employees, and to ensure that this information is made publicly available, while minimising administrative burdens by excluding micro-enterprises; calls on the European Union and its Member States to ensure that, when negotiating tax and investment treaties with developing countries, income or profits resulting from cross-border activities should be taxed in the source country where value is extracted or created;
Amendment 1088 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 170 a (new)
Paragraph 170 a (new)
170 a. Recalls the article 79 of the Political Declaration Setting Out The Framework For The Future Relationship Between the European Union and The United Kingdom and insists that the future relationship must ensure open and fair competition and that provisions to ensure this should cover State Aid, competition, social and employment standards, environmental standards, climate change, and relevant tax matters, building on the level playing field arrangements provided for in Withdrawal Agreement and commensurate with the overall economic relations;
Amendment 1094 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 170 b (new)
Paragraph 170 b (new)
170 b. Notes with concerns the fact the United Kingdom was ranked 2nd biggest conduit for tax havens after The Netherlands1, and ranked 23rd on the 2018 Financial Secrecy Index, accounting for 17% of the global market in off shorefinancial services; deplores the fact the UK remains in the centre of a largenetwork of British secrecy jurisdictions, notably the Crown Dependencies Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man and to Overseas Territories including tax havens such as Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands or Bermuda; underlines that the Cayman Islands ranked on the 3rd place, Guernsey on the 10th place, British Virgin Islands on 16th and Jersey on 18th place of the respective index; ________________ [1] Offshore Financial Centers and the five largest value conduits in the world, July 2017, University of Amsterdam. http://corpnet.uva.nl/ofcs/
Amendment 1095 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 170 c (new)
Paragraph 170 c (new)
170 c. Notes that 90 % of the biggest global companies have a presence in a UK tax haven; states that the very light regulation in the past in the area of tax and money laundering encouraged criminal around the globe to use the UK and the City of London for their illegal activities; underlined that according to the National Crime Agency GBP 90 billion – about 4% of UK’s GDP – is laundered into the UK annually, large number coming from Russia;
Amendment 1096 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 170 d (new)
Paragraph 170 d (new)
170 d. Demands that the future deal must include a tax good governance clause and that the UK abides by exiting and ongoing EU tax legislation in return to any access to Single Market for those offering financial, legal or accountancy services;
Amendment 1098 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 170 e (new)
Paragraph 170 e (new)
170 e. Notes that Brexit will create a divergence of policies against financial crimes, tax evasion and tax avoidance between the EU and the United Kingdom, which will constitute new economic, fiscal and security risks; stresses the urgency to approve the necessary reforms in these areas and the need to reassess the financial agreements with the UK that will become a third country vis-à-vis the EU in the event of Brexit, both regarding London as a global financial center as well as its Overseas territories;
Amendment 1099 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 170 f (new)
Paragraph 170 f (new)
170 f. Calls on the Council to promptly assess the situation of Gibraltar once the Brexit is effective to include the territory in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions as it is obviously non- compliant with the Council’s criteria;
Amendment 1114 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 172 a (new)
Paragraph 172 a (new)
172 a. Notes that double taxation treaties between Member States and developing countries do not usually promote source taxation, therefore benefiting multinational corporations at the expense of mobilisation of domestic resources by developing countries; notes that the lack of domestic resource mobilisation prevents fully financed public services such as healthcare or education in these countries, which disproportionately impacts women and girls; urges the Member States to mandate the Commission to review existing double taxation treaties so as to examine and address these problems, and to ensure that future double taxation treaties include gender equality provisions in addition to general anti-abuse provisions;
Amendment 1128 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 177 a (new)
Paragraph 177 a (new)
177 a. Reiterates the need for enhanced cooperation between tax administrations and financial supervisors for a joint and effective surveillance of the role of financial intermediaries and in the light that some tax-driven financial instruments may pose a risk to financial market stability and market integrity;
Amendment 1131 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 177
Paragraph 177
177. Welcomes the broad definition of both ‘intermediary’ and ‘reportable cross- border arrangement’ in the recently adopted DAC683 ; calls on all Member States to deliberately apply the EU reporting obligation also to purely domestic cases; _________________ 83 OJ L 139, 5.6.2018, p. 1.
Amendment 1146 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 178 a (new)
Paragraph 178 a (new)
178 a. Recognizes that the divergent interests between the commercial interests of the tax avoidance industry and the public mandate of the EU to minimise tax avoidance can clash in situations where conflicts of interest arise, such as public procurement contracts that require the provision of paid advice, the provision of informal or unpaid advice via official advisory and expert groups, and via revolving doors;
Amendment 1151 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 178 b (new)
Paragraph 178 b (new)
178 b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that those with a commercial or vested interests in promoting tax avoidance and tax evasion, such as big accountancy firms like Deloitte, PWC, EY and KPMG, do not have an advising role in policies to fight tax avoidance and evasion; for instance, restricting their membership in advisory and expert groups, not commissioning tax-related studies and impact assessments to these actors, regulating revolving doors, and implementing full lobby transparency rules;
Amendment 1154 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 178 c (new)
Paragraph 178 c (new)
178 c. Stresses the role played by intermediaries as facilitators and beneficiaries of ATP schemes and deplores that such intermediaries develop bespoke schemes for customers in a way that undermines the cohesion of society and operate with a business model that runs counter to the social contract;
Amendment 1156 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 179
Paragraph 179
179. Reiterates that financial institutions, advisors and other intermediaries that knowingly, systematically and repeatedly facilitate, engage or participate in money laundering or tax evasion activities should face effective, proportional and dissuasive penalties, their licences to operate should undergo serious revision and, where applicable, be prestricvented from operating in the single marketSingle Market; re-iterates its request that self-regulating professions such as lawyers and auditors should be subject to an independent oversight and calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal to amend AMLD5 in this regard;
Amendment 1171 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 181
Paragraph 181
181. Worries that whistle-blowers are often discouraged from reporting their concerns for fear of retaliation; considers that the recognition in AMLD5 of the right of whistle-blowers to present a complaint in a safe manner to the respective competent authorities when exposed to a threat or retaliation and of their right to an effective remedy constitutes a significant improvement of the situation of individuals reporting suspicions of money laundering or terrorist financing internally within the company or to a FIU; calls on Member States to implement fully-fledged whistleblower protection when transposing the AMLD5 into national law;
Amendment 1178 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 182 a (new)
Paragraph 182 a (new)
182 a. Welcomes the European Commission’s April 2018 publication of a horizontal proposal on whistleblower protection; regrets that EU staff members were not incorporated in the scope; recognizes that EU staff members are not currently afforded the same level of protections as in the proposal; urges all EU institutions, agencies, and bodies to immediately address this situation by adapting their internal rules in line with international best practices for the protection of whistleblowers;
Amendment 1188 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 185
Paragraph 185
185. Strongly condemns acts of violence against journalists; recalls with dismay that in recent years journalists involved in the investigation of dubious activities with a money laundering component have been murdered in Malta and Slovakia85 ; underlines that according to the Council of Europe, abuses and crimes committed against journalists have a deeply chilling effect on freedom of expression and amplify the phenomenon of self- censorship; _________________ 85 Daphne Caruana Galizia, killed in Malta on 16.10.2017; Ján Kuciak, killed together with his partner Martina Kušnírová, in Slovakia on 21.2.2018.
Amendment 1193 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 186
Paragraph 186
186. Urges theCalls on Maltese authorities to deploy all available resources to make progress in identifying the instigator of the murder of Daphne Caruana Galizia;
Amendment 1197 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 187 a (new)
Paragraph 187 a (new)
187 a. Calls on Slovak authorities to fully investigate cases of large-scale tax evasion schemes, VAT frauds and money laundering cases brought to light by Jan Kuciak´s investigations;
Amendment 1199 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 187 b (new)
Paragraph 187 b (new)
187 b. Calls on the Commission and Bulgaria to ensure the protection of Bulgarian investigative journalists in the context of the scandal revealed by Bivol, related to the use of shell companies to misuse EU funds in the country;
Amendment 1201 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 188
Paragraph 188
188. Deplores the fact that investigative journalists are often victims of abusive lawsuits intended to censor, intimidate and silence them by burdening them with the costs of legal defence until they are forced to abandon their criticism or opposition; recalls that these abusive lawsuits constitute a threat to fundamental democratic rights, such as to freedom of expression, freedom of the press and freedom to disseminate and receive information; calls on the Commission and Member States to put in place mechanismslegislative and non- legislative proposals to protect journalists and to prevent strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP); considers that these mechanisms should take duly into consideration the right to a good name and reputation; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of taking legislative action in this area;
Amendment 1208 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 188 a (new)
Paragraph 188 a (new)
188 a. Calls on the European Commission to set up a financial support scheme for investigative journalism as soon as possible, including a permanent and dedicated budget line for the support of independent, quality media and investigative journalism in the post-2020 MFF;
Amendment 1210 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 188 b (new)
Paragraph 188 b (new)
188 b. Regrets that the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the EU refused to participate in a TAX3 committee hearing, failing to comply with the principle of sincere cooperation enshrined in the artcilec 4 of the TEU;
Amendment 1213 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 189
Paragraph 189
189. Welcomes the work done by the Platform for Tax Good Governance; notes that the mandate of the Platform applies until 16 June 2019; calls for it to be extended or renewed to ensure that civil society concerns and expertise are heard by Member States and the Commission, but considers that intermediaries with a commercial interest in tax avoidance should no longer be members; encourages the Commission to broaden the scope of the experts invited to the Expert Group on Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (EGMLTF) to include experts from the private sector (business and NGOs) so long as they do not have a commercial interest in these issues;
Amendment 1222 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 192 a (new)
Paragraph 192 a (new)
192 a. Deplores that the Council failed to cooperate with the TAX3 Committee by not allowing the access to its documents or by doing so with a significant delay, and thus failed to comply with principle of sincere cooperation and breach of article 4 of TEU; deplores that the Bulgarian Presidency repeatedly refused to come to speak to the Committee about matters concerning the tax agenda;
Amendment 1223 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 193
Paragraph 193
193. Notes the increased communication from the CoC Group and welcomes in particular the biannual publication of its report to the Council, as well as the letters sent to jurisdictions and commitments received in the context of the EU listing process of the EU tax blacklist;
Amendment 1227 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 196 a (new)
Paragraph 196 a (new)
196 a. Calls on the CoC Group to take further measures to ensure transparency of its meetings particularly recording and publishing minutes of meetings including the positions of the different Member States on the discussed agenda;
Amendment 1229 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 197
Paragraph 197
197. Believes that the mandate of the CoC Group needs to be updated, since it addresses matters beyond the assessment of harmful EU tax practices, which is more than simply providing technical input to the decisions made by the Council; calls on the extension of the scope of the CoC Group, to enable it to deal with personal taxation issues, including CBI/RBI schemes, special schemes provided by Member States, and amnesties; calls, based on the nature of the work undertaken by the Group which is also of a political nature, for such tasks to be brought back under a framework which enables democratic control or supervision, starting by applying transparency; urges the CoC Group to apply transparency principles to its decision-making process, publishing not only the final position of the Group but also the positions of its members;
Amendment 1238 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 201
Paragraph 201
201. Takes note of the persons who refused to participate in TAX3 committee hearings as referred to in Annex XX; requests to deny non-cooperative parties the access to the European Parliament and calls on the Council and the Commission to do the same;
Amendment 1275 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 206
Paragraph 206
206. Stresses that all scenarios should be envisaged and not only shifting from unanimity to qualified majority voting through a passerelle clause, since the latter clause also requires unanimity in the Council to be triggered; calls on the Commission to issue its proposal before the end of its current mandate, early 2019;
Amendment 1283 #
2018/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 208
Paragraph 208
208. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Council, the Council, the Commission, the ESAs, EPPO, the ECB, Moneyval, the Member States, the national parliaments, the UN, the G20, the FATF and the OECD.
Amendment 1 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital -A a (new)
Recital -A a (new)
-Aa. whereas under Article 8 TFEU the EU is committed to promoting gender equality and ensuring gender mainstreaming in all of its actions;
Amendment 4 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital -A b (new)
Recital -A b (new)
-Ab. whereas violence against women and girls is one of the most prevalent human rights violations in the world;
Amendment 9 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the need for the EU, in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for the 2030, the European Consensus on Development, Agenda and the Gender Equality Action Plan 2016- 2020 (GAP II), to continue to pursue its commitment to developing societies free from all forms of discrimination and violence and contributing to a secure, prosperous and sustainable world;
Amendment 12 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that the EU Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development is one of the fundamental tools of the EU to improve gender equality in third countries and therefore believes that GAP2 should take the form of a Commission communication; calls on the Commission to take into account EP’s resolution on the renewal of the GAP;
Amendment 18 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. HStresses that gender equality is a fundamental human right and highlights the affirmation of UN Secretary-General António Guterres that 'there is overwhelming evidence that investing in women is the most effective way to lift communities, companies and countries. Women’s participation makes peace agreements stronger, societies more resilient and economies more vigorous';
Amendment 24 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to provide continued support to protect human rights defenders, women’s organisations and women leaders as active actors committed to promoting, protecting and raising awareness of women’s rights;
Amendment 25 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Expresses concerns over the ongoing backlash against women’s rights and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in the world;
Amendment 26 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Highlights the need for the EU to remain committed to the full implementation of obligations and commitments to women’s rights made in CEDAW, the Beijing Platform for Action, the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population & Development, and the outcomes of their review conferences;
Amendment 30 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the need to guarantee universal access to sexual and reproductive healthcare services, to ensure an rights, including sexual education, family planning and safe and legal abortion services, to ensure women’s right to decide over their own bodies, that women receive the recommended natal care and, to prevent high-risk births and reduce child and maternal mortality;
Amendment 35 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Strongly condemns the reinstatement and expansion of the Global Gag Rule and its impact on women’s and girls’ global health and rights; reiterates its call on the EU and its Member States to fill the financing gap left by the US in that area using both national as well as EU development funding;
Amendment 38 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Member States to reinforce the implementation of policies that empower girls and women, combat poverty and social exclusion and within the framework of SDG 5 and the ILO's 2018 'Women at Work' initiative, focus on providing women and girls with equal access to primary and higher education and training, decent work and equal pay, equal access to financial services and representation in economic and political decision-making processes;
Amendment 40 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the EEAS to ensure that the outcomes of the 62st session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) will be included in its policies and will provide a renewed impetus in achieving gender equality and the empowerment of rural women and girls;
Amendment 46 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the joint efforts and investments of the EU, together with the UN, in launching the 'Spotlight Initiative', aimed at eliminating all forms of violence against women and girls, while reiterating that women around the globe remain the most vulnerable toviolence against women is one of the most widespread, persistent and devastating human rights violations around the globe, which include domestic violence, mobbing, sexual exploitation, human trafficking, female genital mutilation, child and forced marriage, rape as a weapon of war and economic discrimination;
Amendment 49 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Strongly regrets that, as per the European Parliament's study on the implementation of the GAP II, current programming appears to side-line the gender dimension in situations of crisis or difficult conflicts; and that, among other outcomes, this has meant that girls and women victims of war rape do not have access to non-discriminatory care, specifically comprehensive medical care, including abortion, despite the GAP II aiming to empower women to have control over their sexual and reproductive life;
Amendment 59 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the EU and the Member States to speed up negotiations on the ratification and implementation of the Istanbul Convention by the EU and the Member States;
Amendment 63 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises that gender equality and gender mainstreaming, which is an obligation laid down in the Treaties, should be a key priority in all working relations, policies and external actions of the EU and supports the related coordinated efforts in the multilateral dialogues and activities of EU delegations such as election observation missions, as well as the work of the EEAS Principle Advisor on Gender in third countries, aimed at promoting peace, security and fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 68 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Amendment 69 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Notes that adequate funding on gender equality in external relations will be necessary to sustain political commitment to this goal; stresses that current funding for gender equality and women’s empowerment actions remain inadequate and urges to reverse this situation in the next MFF;
Amendment 84 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Condemns the atrocities practised on displaced people such as refugees, migrants and asylum seekers, especially women and girls, around the world, particul; calls on the Member States to take all necessarly in Venezuela and on members of the Rohingya minority in Myanmar.measures to ensure the protection of women migrants, refugees and asylum seekers such as legal counselling, access to health, safe spaces for women and children and access to sexual and reproductive health and rights, including safe abortions;
Amendment 88 #
2018/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Condemns all forms of discrimination and violence against LGBTIQ people; calls on the EEAS to raise and promote global awareness on LGBTIQ rights through the EU external actions in order to end the discrimination they face on a daily basis in line with its Guidelines to Promote and Protect the Enjoyment of All Human Rights by LGBTI Persons;
Amendment 284 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 e (new)
Paragraph 17 e (new)
17e. Emphasises that strengthening regional security in the Indo-Pacific is of critical importance to the interests of the EU and its Member States; stresses that all disputes should be settled through peaceful means based on international laws; takes note that official dialogue between China and Taiwan has been frozen over the past two years; encourages a quick resumption of bilateral talks to de-escalate tensions between the two sides and maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait; reiterates its firm support for Taiwan's meaningful participation in international organisations, mechanisms and activities;
Amendment 1 #
2018/2072(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas the Commission systematically declares all expenditure related to the Turkey Facility, including the financing of Turkish patrol boats, as official development aid which turns Turkey, a non- developing country, into the EU's biggest beneficiary of aid;
Amendment 2 #
2018/2072(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Insists that the Commission reinforces the monitoring of the use of FRT and that it reports regularly in adequate detail to the budgetary authorities on the compatibility of the actions financed with the underlying legal basis in general and the types of actions listed in Article 3(2) of Commission Decision establishing the FRT in particular;
Amendment 4 #
2018/2072(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that the purpose of Draft amending budget No 3/2018 is primarily to allow for the schooling of refugee children in Turkey to continue seamlessly and to strengthen the livelihood and resilience of Syrian refugees in Turkey;
Amendment 5 #
2018/2072(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Is surprised by the fact that the Commission declares systematically all expenditure related to the Turkey Facility as official development aid; is equally surprised that the OECD has largely accepted this practice; considers that this constitutes a serious weakening of the concept of aid;
Amendment 3 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission proposal of 14 March 2012 for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures (Women on boards directive) (COM(2012)0614),
Amendment 6 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 12 September 2017 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, by the European Union, of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence,
Amendment 20 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas less serious offences, when left unchallenged, provide motivation for more serious offences;
Amendment 49 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that sexual harassment is a violation of human rights that is linked to patriarchal power structures that need to urgently be reshaped;
Amendment 50 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the central role of all men in ending all forms of harassment and sexual violence; calls on the Commission and all Member States to actively involve men in awareness-raising and prevention campaigns, as well as education campaigns for gender equality; stresses that prevention campaigns also need to focus on less serious offences;
Amendment 65 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on all Member States which have not already done so to ratify and fully implement the Istanbul Convention without delay and calls on the Member States which have already ratified the Istanbul Convention to fully implement it;
Amendment 68 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the new widespread public debate, including on social media, which is contributing to redrawing the boundaries in relation to sexual harassment and acceptable behaviours; welcomes, in particular, initiatives such as the #MeToo movement and strongly supports all the women and girls who have participated in the campaign, including those who denounced their perpetrators;
Amendment 70 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 74 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Notes that to obtain comparable figures on prevalence of sexual harassment and bullying across EU Member States, greater awareness and recognition of the problems should be prioritised through concerted effort to spread information and training;
Amendment 75 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. CReiterates its calls on the Commission and Member States to adoptto submit a proposal for a directive against all forms of violence against women and girls and of gender- based violence which should include common definitions of the different types of VAW and common legal standards on criminalising VAW, based on women’s stories and first-hand experience;
Amendment 77 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on Member States to ensure that law enforcement officers and judges, judges and all civil servants who deal with cases of bullying and sexual harassment are trained to understand violence and harassment at the workplace and beyond;
Amendment 101 #
2018/2055(INI)
19. Calls on Member States to introduce measures to prevent and combat violence and harassment at the workplace through policies which set out prevention measures, effective, transparent and confidential procedures to deal with complaints, sanctions for perpetrators, and information and trainings to ensure that workers understand policies and procedures and support to companies to draw up actions plans to implement all these measures; stresses that these measures should not be incorporated into existing structures if these structures already have inbuilt gender barriers;
Amendment 110 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Member States to take measures to ensure equal pay and a balanced representation of women on boards of directors, as a means of avoiding the abuse of power and to promote gender equality, which is fundamental to combating VAW; calls on the Commission to step up its efforts to unblock the Directive on Women on Boards, which has been on hold in the Council since 2013;
Amendment 116 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls for the swift adoption of the revision of the Written Statement Directive; retains Parliament’s call for a Directive on decent working conditions, which should cover measures to combat mobbing and sexual harassment in the workplace;
Amendment 122 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Acknowledges that parity lists play a key role in enabling the participation of women in politics and reshaping power structures that discriminate women;
Amendment 124 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on all political parties to take concrete steps to tackle this problem, including the introduction of action plans and the revisingon of internal party regulations to introduce a zero-tolerance policy, preventive measures, procedures to deal with complaints and adequate sanctions for perpetrators of sexual harassment and the bullying of women in politics;
Amendment 127 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Amendment 131 #
2018/2055(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Highlights that awareness-raising campaigns combating gender stereotypes, patriarchal power relations and promoting zero-tolerance on sexual harassment are among the best tools in helping to address gender-based violence in public spaces;
Amendment 23 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the current ratio of contributions to the FRiT from the Union budget (EUR 1 billion) and Member States (EUR 2 billion) should be maintained; calls for a corresponding reduction in the proposed 2019 contribution to the FRiT; insists that the Commission reinforces the monitoring of the use of the FRiT and that it reports regularly in adequate detail to the budgetary authorities on the compatibility of the actions financed with the underlying legal basis in general and the types of actions listed in article 3.2. of the FRiT in particular;
Amendment 28 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that, under current projections, only 19,3 % of the Union budget 2014 – 2020 would be devoted to climate-related measures, failing thus to reach the target of 20 %, an objective which pre-dates the Paris Climate agreement and should anyway be revised upwards; understands that this is largely due to delays in cohesion policy and the rural development programmes; urges Member States, who manage them, to speed up their implementation with a focus on climate- related spending in order to offset the lower allocations made during the first years of the MFF; calls on the Commission to develop an action plan within programmes having massive potential to contribute to reaching the climate-related spending target;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to continue to provide increased support to Ukraine and Tunisia; calls for more funding in support of the stabilisation of Libya, including with regard to supporting civil society and upholding human rights standards and international law;
Amendment 44 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Asks for more funding under the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the ProtectDefenders Mechanism for the protection of human rights defenders;
Amendment 45 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Regrets the cuts in the EU contribution to the European-Inter University Centre for Human Rights and Democratisation (EIUC) and its Global Campus of Human Rights, that will seriously undermine the functioning of this flagship EU academic programme; calls on the Commission to maintain its financial allocation to EIUC at a consistent level compared to past contributions;
Amendment 49 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for Unionenhanced EU support for the Middle East Peace Process, the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA to be strengthened.viability of a two-state solution, the Palestinian Authority, civil society in both Israel and Palestine and UNRWA; expresses alarm at the increase in destruction and confiscation of EU- funded humanitarian assistance in the West Bank; deplores the lack of resolve of the EEAS and the Commission, as highlighted by the European Court of Auditors, to secure compensation from and guarantees of non-repetition by the Israeli authorities; expects the Commission to deduct the equivalent of these losses from bilateral EU assistance to Israel;
Amendment 59 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Expresses its intention to pay particular attention to the implementation by the Commission of the agreements found on the European Defence Industrial Development Programme and the European Solidarity Corps, which should be set out in the Amending Letter, to be issued by the Commission in October 2018;
Amendment 67 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
Amendment 75 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 81 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Expects the pressure on some Member States’ migration and asylum systems, as well as on their borders, to remain high in 2019, and is of the opinion that additional funding is needed in the field of migration, also in view of any future, unpredictable needs in this area; reinforces therefore the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund as regards supporting legal migration to the Union and promoting the effective integration of third-country nationals and enhancing fair and effective return strategies, in particular to support Member States in improving integration measures for migrants, especially children and unaccompanied minors;
Amendment 139 #
2018/2046(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 64
Paragraph 64
Amendment 7 #
2018/2024(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the Commission proposal and believes that it corresponds broadly to Parliament’s own priorities; intends to further defend an appropriate level of appropriations corresponding to the latter; notes the increase of 3.1 % in commitmentNotes the relative lack of ambition of the Commission proposal as reflected in the even lower percentage of GNI as compared to 2018 both for commitment appropriations (1 % as compared to 1.02%) and payment appropriations (0.9% as compared to 0.92%); intends to defend an appropriate higher level of appropriations;
Amendment 24 #
2018/2024(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 42 #
2018/2024(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Commends the fact that the Commission proposal would enable reaching the target of 20 % of the budget being dedicated to climate spending in 2019; regrets, however. that the Commission has not followed up on Parliament’s request regarding offsetting the lower allocations made during the first years of the MFF; believes that more should be done through the development of an action plan within programmes with massive potential, as for example under Horizon 2020, EAGF, EAFRD, EMFF or LIFE+; recalls the Court of Auditors reasoned criticism as regards the methodology deployed by the Commission and calls for swift improvements in this light and in this regard;
Amendment 54 #
2018/2024(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that several important legislative initiatives under negotiation or in the early stages of implementation, such as the revision of the Dublin Regulation, the establishment of the Entry/Exit System and the European Travel Information and Authorisation System, the upgrading of the Schengen Information System and the initiative on interoperability of EU information systems for security, borders and migration management are expected to have significant budgetary implications for the 2019 budget, and underlines the importance of adequate financing to match the Union’s ambition in these areascost efficiency in this regard;
Amendment 88 #
2018/2024(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Believes that in the context of a wide range of security concerns, including changing forms of radicalisation, violence and terrorism that surpass individual Member States’ capacity to respond, the EU budget should encourage cooperation on security-related matters; in this context, questions how this high-risk security context is reconcilable with the proposed significant decrease of commitment appropriations (-26,6 %) for the Internal Security Fund (ISF); highlights that spending in this area can only fall on fertile ground if unjustifiable obstacles to intra-European cooperation and targeted information sharing are removed;
Amendment 3 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas Chile is a strong advocate of democracy and human rights, free and at the international level, while there remain problems inside the country, in particular violent frictions and discriminatory laws concerning ethnic minorities, such as the Mapuche; whereas the Chilean Government is a strong advocate of free and open trade and multilateralism; whereas it is also a key member of the Pacific Alliance, the Organisation of American States (OAS), and the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR);
Amendment 8 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the recent parliamentary and presidential elections have once again demonstrated the stable and mature character of Chilean democracy; whereas Chile has benefited from strong economic growth in recent decadesbased on export of raw materials in recent decades, which has however led to a strong depletion of soils and water, and has also benefited from low wages and the exemption of employers from paying social security;
Amendment 19 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas an updated Association Agreement, together with the agreements with Mexico and Mercosur that are currently being (re-)negotiated, would reinforce the EU’s role as a key trade ally of Latin America, at a time when other players are increasingly trying to gain influence in the region, such as China and Russia, while the USA continue to be the first trade and military partner;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
a) to considerably strengthen cooperation between Chile and the EU, two like-minded partners in an environment of new uncertainty in international relations, on the basis of our shared values and principles of democracy, fight against climate change, ensuring gender equality, the rule of law, good governance, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms;
Amendment 27 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
c) to include a joint commitment to the protection and promotion of human rights, fundamental freedoms, gender equality, and the rights of minorities such as the LGBTI community, ethnic minorities and indigenous people, with enforceable mechanisms for monitoring, regular reporting and sanctioning;
Amendment 30 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
ca) to seek a balance between all three pillars of the agreement (cooperation, political dialogue and trade) so that none can overrule the other or be used as a remedy or compensation for imbalances created by the other, while respect for human rights, and in particular ending discriminatory laws and practice against ethnic minorities and their land, governs all actions;
Amendment 33 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
d) to aim to foster sustainable socio- economic development, fight poverty and reduce inequality levels in Chile, as the overall and common aim of all three pillars, and to include benchmarks as a basis for regular and public reporting;
Amendment 52 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k
Paragraph 1 – point k
k) to enhance cooperation on the fight against corruption, money laundering and tax evasion; to promote international efforts against tax avoidance and tax evasion, and to enshrine concrete measures such as the need of commercial presence of an enterprise for registering, mandatory financial and non-financial reports of enterprises, including banks and insurance agencies, and the protection of whistle blowers;
Amendment 56 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
na) to develop a methodology to show the effects of the modernised agreement on men and women and use the results as a basis for designing policies to achieve gender balance and a fair sharing of reproductive work;
Amendment 58 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o
Paragraph 1 – point o
o) to reaffirm the joint commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement and to provide for a close cooperation on environmental protection and the fight against climate change, including concrete language on the ban of investment into large scale projects with negative effects for the environment and climate;
Amendment 61 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
oa) to take the recent publication of the negotiating directives as an important precedent and commit to publish all negotiating directives for international agreements in the future;
Amendment 65 #
2018/2018(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point o b (new)
ob) to reaffirm access to water as a human right and to rule out the commercialisation of water;
Amendment 158 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the Asylum, Migration and MiIntegration Fund
Amendment 173 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) In order to support efforts to ensure a comprehensive approach to management of migration grounded on mutual trust, solidarity and responsibility sharing among Member States and Union institutions, with the objective of ensuring a common sustainable Union policy on asylum and immigration, Member States should be supported by adequate financial resources in the form of the Asylum, Migration and MiIntegration Fund (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Fund’).
Amendment 214 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Considering the crucial role played by local and regional authorities and civil society organisations in the field of integration and to facilitate the direct access of these entities to funding at Union level, the Fund should facilitate the implementation of actions in the field of integration by local and regional authorities or civil society organisations, including through the use of the thematic facility and through a higher co-financing rate for these actions.
Amendment 287 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 54
Recital 54
(54) Pursuant to paragraph 22 and 23 of the Inter-institutional agreement for Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016, there is a need to evaluate this Fund on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burden, in particular on Member States. These requirements, where appropriate, can include measurable indicators, as a basis for evaluating the effects of the Fund on the ground. In order to measure the achievements of the Fund, common indicators and related targets should be established in relation to each specific objective of the Fund. Through these common indicators and financial reporting, the Commission and the Member States should monitor the implementation of the Fund, in accordance with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) …/2021 of the European Parliament and of the Council [Common Provisions Regulation] and this Regulation. A centralised report outlining monitoring results and implementation of AMIF actions at both local and regional, national and EU level, including specific projects and partners, should be made publicly available and communicated to the European Parliament.
Amendment 335 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a Partnership For the purposes of the Fund, the partnership referred to in Article 6 of the Common Provisions Regulation shall include: (a) local and regional authorities; (b) economic and social partners; (c) relevant bodies representing civil society, environmental partners and bodies responsible for promoting social inclusion, fundamental rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality and non-discrimination. These partners shall be involved in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of programmes.
Amendment 369 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. At least 30% of the financial resources of the thematic facility in line with point (b) of paragraph 2, shall be allocated to activities carried out by local and regional authorities and at least 30% shall be allocated to activities carried out by civil society organisations.
Amendment 371 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
e) support to Member States at local, regional and national level and civil society organisations therein, contributing to solidarity and responsibility efforts; and
Amendment 385 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 6
Article 9 – paragraph 6
6. The thematic facility shall in particular, support actions falling under the implementation measure 2(b) of Annex II that are implemented by the local and regional authorities or civil society organisations. In that regard, a minimum of 10% of the financial envelope of the thematic facility shall be granted under direct or indirect management to local and regional authorities implementing integration actions.
Amendment 546 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 1 – point c
Annex II – point 1 – point c
(c) enhancing solidarity and responsibility-sharing between the Member States, in particular towards those most affected by migratory flows, as well as providing support to Member States and local and regional authorities contributing to solidarity efforts;
Amendment 575 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 1 – point a a (new)
Annex III – point 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) the establishment and development of local integration strategies;
Amendment 586 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 2 – point a
Annex III – point 2 – point a
(a) providing material aid, including assistance at the border and emergency services provided by local authorities;
Amendment 636 #
2018/0248(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point k a (new)
Annex III – point 3 – point k a (new)
(k a) building the capacity of integration services provided by local authorities, including first accommodation, counselling, shelters, housing, education and vocational trainings.
Amendment 130 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) at global level, to consolidate and support democracy, rule of law and human rights, support civil society organisations, including those defending women's rights, further stability and peace and address other global challenges including migration and mobility;
Amendment 133 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) Gender Equality and Women and Girls’ Empowerment;
Amendment 138 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 a (new)
– Gender Equality and Women and Girls’ Empowerment EUR 750 million,
Amendment 149 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. A rights-based approach encompassing all human rights, whether civil and political or economic, social and cultural shall be applied in order to integrate human rights principles, women’s rights and gender equality, to support the right holders in claiming their rights with a focus on poorer and more vulnerable groups and to assist partner countries in implementing their international human rights obligations. This Regulation shall promote gender equality and women’s empowerment.
Amendment 169 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) the Human Rights and Democracy, the Gender Equality and Women and Girls’ Empowerment and Civil Society thematic programmes referred to in Article 4(3)(a), (aa) and (b) shall provide assistance independently of the consent of governments and other public authorities of the third countries concerned. These thematic programmes shall mainly support civil society organisations, including those defending women’s rights.
Amendment 172 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) the partners’ needs, established on the basis of specific criteria, taking into account the population, poverty, inequality, human development, gender equality, economic and environmental vulnerability, and state and societal resilience;
Amendment 174 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) the potential impact of Union funding on gender equality;
Amendment 178 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) a joint document between the Union and the concerned partner or partners setting out a gender impact assessment.
Amendment 180 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Multiannual indicative programmes for thematic programmes shall set out the Union's strategy, the priorities selected for financing by the Union, the specific objectives, the expected results, a gender impact assessment, clear and specific performance indicators, and the international situation and the activities of the main partners for the theme concerned.
Amendment 183 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) needs, using indicators such as population and, level of development and gender equality indicators;
Amendment 186 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) impact on gender equality;
Amendment 190 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall adopt annual or multiannual action plans or measures. The measures may take the form of individual measures, special measures, support measures or exceptional assistance measures. Action plans and measures shall specify for each action the objectives pursued, the expected results and main activities, the methods of implementation, the budget and any associated support expenditures. Action plans shall specify the % of the budget dedicated to achieve the objectives linked to gender equality and women and girls’ empowerment.
Amendment 195 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
Any decision to provide budget support shall be based on budget support policies agreed by the Union, gender budgeting, a clear set of eligibility criteria and a careful assessment of the risks and benefits.
Amendment 197 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to the limitations inherent to the nature and objectives of the action, participation in procurement, grant and prize award procedures for actions financed under the Human Rights and Democracy, Gender equality and Women and Girls’ Empowerment and Stability and Peace programmes as well as rapid response actions, shall be open without limitations.
Amendment 199 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 12
Article 24 – paragraph 12
12. Under the Democracy and Human Rights and the Gender equality and Women and Girls’ Empowerment programmes, any entity not covered under the definition of legal entity in Article 2(6) shall be eligible when this is necessary to pursue the areas of intervention of this programme.
Amendment 201 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The purpose of the EFSD+ as an integrated financial package supplying financial capacity drawing on the methods of implementation set up in Article 23(1)(a), (e), (f) and (g), shall be to support investments and increase access to financing, in order to foster sustainable and inclusive economic and social development and promote the socio-economic resilience in partner countries with a particular focus on the, eradication of poverty, women's economic empowerment, sustainable and inclusive growth, the creation of decent jobs, economic opportunities, skills and entrepreneurship, socioeconomic sectors, micro, small and medium-sized enterprises as well as addressing specific socioeconomic root causes of irregularforced migration for economic reasons, in accordance with the relevant indicative programming documents. Special attention shall be given to countries identified as experiencing fragility or conflict, Least Developed Countries and heavily indebted poor countries.
Amendment 202 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) a mention of the objectives and purpose of this Regulation, a needs assessment, a gender impact assessment and an indication of the expected results, taking into account the promotion of corporate social responsibility and responsible business conduct;
Amendment 203 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point g
Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point g
(g) monitoring, including indicators disaggregated by gender, reporting and evaluation obligations;
Amendment 207 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 5
Article 31 – paragraph 5
5. The annual report shall contain information relating to the previous year on the measures financed, the results of gender responsive monitoring and evaluation exercises, including a chapter on gender equality, the involvement of the relevant partners, and the implementation of budgetary commitments and of payment appropriations broken down by country, region and cooperation sector and specifying the budgetary commitments and payment appropriations allocated to gender equality actions. It shall assess the results of the Union funding using, as far as possible, specific and measurable indicators of its role in meeting the objectives of this Regulation. In the case of development cooperation, the report shall also assess, where possible and relevant, the adherence to development effectiveness principles, including for innovative financial instruments.
Amendment 208 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 6
Article 31 – paragraph 6
6. The annual report prepared in 2021 shall contain consolidated information from annual reports concerning the period from 2014 to 2020 on all funding from the Regulations referred to in Article 40(2), including external assigned revenues and contributions to trust funds, and offering a breakdown of spending by country, use of financial instruments, commitments and payments. The report shall reflect the main lessons learnt, including on the impact of the measures on gender equality, and the follow-up to the recommendations of the external evaluative exercises carried out in previous years.
Amendment 212 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The final evaluation report shall be gender responsive and include a chapter on gender equality.
Amendment 213 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Article 32 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
The final evaluation report shall also contain consolidated information from relevant annual reports on all funding governed by this Regulation, including external assigned revenues and contributions to trust funds offering a breakdown of spending by beneficiary country, use of financial instruments, commitments and payments and spending dedicated to promote gender equality.
Amendment 141 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) With 1.8% of EU GDP, down from 2.2% in 2009, infrastructure investment activities in the Union in 2016 were about 20% below investment rates before the global financial crisis. Thus, while a recovery in investment-to-GDP ratios in the Union can be observed, it remains below what might be expected in a strong recovery period and is insufficient to compensate years of underinvestment. More importantly, the current investment levels and forecasts do not cover the Union’s structural investment needs in the face of technological change and global competitiveness, including for innovation, skills, infrastructure, small and medium- sized enterprises ('SMEs') and the need to address key societal challenges such as sustainability or population ageing. Consequently, continued support is necessary to address market and coordination failures and sub-optimal investment situations to reduce the investment gap in targeted sectors to achieve the Union's policy objectives. In that regard, the primary aim of the InvestEU Programme should be to support otherwise difficult to fund projects that provide European citizens with long-term environmental and societal benefits, such as high quality long-term jobs and public infrastructure. It is therefore of high priority to identify and support projects that provide this genuine additionality and quality.
Amendment 153 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In the last years, the Union has adopted ambitious strategies to complete the Single Market and to stimulate sustainable growth and jobs, such as the Capital Markets Union, the Digital Single Market Strategy, the Clean Energy for all Europeans package, the Union Action Plan for the Circular Economy, the Low- Emission Mobility Strategy, the Defence and the Space Strategy for Europe. The InvestEU Fund should exploit and reinforce synergies between those mutually reinforcing strategies through providing support to investment and access to financing.
Amendment 162 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The InvestEU Fund should contribute to improving the competitiveness of the Unionand value added of the Union's productive structure, including in the field of innovation and digitisation, the sustainability and inclusiveness of the Union's economic growth, the social resilience and inclusiveness and the integration of the Union capital markets, including solutions addressing their fragmentation and diversifying sources of financing for the Union enterprises. To that end, it should support projects that are technically and economically viable by providing a framework for the use of debt, risk sharing and equity instruments underpinned by a guarantee from the Union's budget and by contributions from implementing partners. It should be demand-driven whileProjects support undered by the InvestEU Fund should at the same time focus onfocus on providing strategic, long- term societal and environmental benefits in key areas of EU policy which would otherwise not be funded, thus contributing to meeting policy objectives of the Union.
Amendment 175 #
2018/0229(COD)
(6) The InvestEU Fund should support investments in tangible and intangible assets to foster growth, investment and employment, and thereby contributing to improved well-being and fairer income distribution in the Union. InvestEU funded projects must meet social and environmental standards, such as the respect for labour rights and climate- friendly energy usage and waste management. Intervention through the InvestEU Fund should complement Union support delivered through grants.
Amendment 180 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The Commission, the Investment Committee and the implementing partners should ensure that projects funded under the InvestEU programme representing public-private partnerships do not entail incentives structures for private actors that could lead to large losses to the public sector.
Amendment 181 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The Union endorsed the objectives set out in the United Nations Agenda 2030 and its Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement in 2015 as well as the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. To achieve the agreed objectives, including those embedded in the environmental policies of the Union, action pursuing sustainable development is to be stepped up significantly. Therefore, the principles of sustainable development should feature prominently in the design of the InvestEU Fund, resilience to climate change, safety and climate- proofing should be the basis of the design of the InvestEU Fund. To this aim, fossil fuel infrastructure and nuclear installations in the power sector will not be entitled to funding.
Amendment 185 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) To achieve the Union's and international climate objectives, climate action targets should overall not be lower than 50%. In order to address the European Court of Auditors recommendations, compulsory climate action targets should be laid out in programme specific legislations and require ex-ante earmarking in all programming and planning processes rather than ex-post accounting.
Amendment 186 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union's climate related long-term objectives and remaining carbon budget, the Union's commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the InvestEU Programme will contribute to mainstream climate actions and to the achievement of an overall target of 250 % of the Union budget expenditures supporting climate objectives. Actions under the InvestEU Programme are expected to contribute 30 at least 60% of the overall financial envelope of the InvestEU Programme to climate objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the InvestEU Programme's preparation and implementation and reassessed in the context of the relevant evaluations and review processes. Climate mainstreaming and climate proofing mechanisms should be unified by reforming, expanding and centralising the Rio Market system, in order to differentiate between mitigation and adaptation, and between sectors; and by "Energy Efficiency First" assessments during infrastructure investment planning, as set out in the Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union, as well as clear exclusion criteria.
Amendment 192 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) With regard to the cost of capital of renewable energy projects, the InvestEU Fund should allow for the use of an innovative guarantee instrument to reduce regulatory risk and associated high cost of capital in some Member States. This possibility should be open on a voluntary basis. To achieve this objective, the InvestEU Fund should contribute where appropriate to the enabling framework for investment into renewable energy as set out in Art 3.5 of the revised [Renewables Directive], including the financing mechanism established by Article 27bis of the [Governance Regulation].
Amendment 194 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The contribution of the InvestEU Fund to the achievement of the climate target will be tracked through an EU climate tracking system developed by the Commission in cooperation with implementing partners and using in an appropriate way the criteria established by [Regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment14 ] for determining whether an economic activity is environmentally sustainable. _________________ 14The InvestEU Fund will also contribute to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into EU policies and initiatives, with sustainable development as an essential guiding principle. _________________ 14 COM(2018) 353 final. COM(2018) 353 final.
Amendment 195 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) According to the 2018 Global Risks Report issued by the World Economic Forum, half of the ten most critical risks threatening the global economy relate to the environment. Such risks include air, soil and water pollution, extreme weather events, biodiversity losses and failures of climate-change mitigation and adaptation. Environmental principles are strongly embedded in the Treaties and many of the Union's policies. Therefore, the mainstreaming of environmental objectives should be promoted in the InvestEU Fund related operations. Environmental protection and related risk prevention and management should be integrated in the preparation and implementation of investments. The EU should also track its biodiversity-related and air pollution control-related expenditure in order to fulfil the reporting obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity and Directive (EU) 2016/2284 of the European Parliament and of the Council15 Investment allocated to environmentally sustainability objectivesAll investment should therefore be tracked using common methodologies coherent with that developed under other Union programmes applying to climate, biodiversity and air pollution management in order to allow assessing the individual and combined impact of investments on the key components of the natural capital, including air, water, land, soil and biodiversity.
Amendment 204 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Low infrastructure investment rates in the Union during the financial crisis undermined the Union's ability to boost sustainable and inclusive growth, competitiveness and convergence. Sizeable investments in the European infrastructure, notably interconnection and energy efficiency, are fundamental to meet the Union's sustainability targets, including the Union's commitments towards the SDGs, the 2030 energy and climate targets. Accordingly, support from the InvestEU Fund should target investments into sustainable development-compatible projects in the field of transport, energy, including energy efficiency and renewable energy, environmental, climate action, maritime and digital infrastructure. InvestEU should prioritise the most significantly under-invested areas that require the most additional investment to meet the Union's sustainability targets, such as energy efficiency. To maximise the impact and the value added of Union financing support, it is appropriate to promote a streamlined, climate proof investment process enabling visibility of the project pipeline and consistency across relevant Union programmes. Bearing in mind security threats, investment projects receiving Union support should take into account principles for the protection of citizens in public spaces. This should be complementary to the efforts made by other Union funds such as the European Regional Development Fund providing support for security components of investments in public spaces, transport, energy and other critical infrastructure.
Amendment 211 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (Directive (EU)2018/844) requires Member States to establish a long-term renovation strategy to support the renovation of the national stock of residential and non-residential buildings, both public and private, into a highly energy efficient and decarbonised building stock by 2050, facilitating the cost-effective transformation of existing buildings into nearly zero-energy buildings. Member States are also required to facilitate access to appropriate mechanisms for aggregation of projects and the reduction of the perceived risk for investors and the private sector.
Amendment 212 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) Whereas the level of overall investment in the Union is increasing, investment in higher-risk activities such as research and innovation is still inadequate. The resulting underinvestment in research and innovation is damaging to the industrial and economic competitiveness of the Union and the quality of life of its citizens. The InvestEU Fund should provide the appropriate financial products to cover different stages in the innovation cycle and a wide range of stakeholders, in particular to allow the upscaling of and deployment of solutions at a commercial scale in the Union, in coorder to make such solutions competitive on world marketsination with public procurement to address social and environmental needs. Particular importance should be given to promoting EU excellence in green technologies at a global level.
Amendment 215 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) A significant effort is urgently needed to invest in digital transformation and to distribute the benefits of it to all Union citizens and businesses. The strong policy framework of the Digital Single Market Strategy should now be matched by investment of a similar ambition, including in ethical artificial intelligence. The latter should be subject to an ex-ante ethical impact assessment. This review should extend beyond the narrow confines of privacy and data protection and take into account the broader societal impacts of the underlying AI agenda. Projects that raise substantial ethical and/or societal impact concerns should be subject to enhanced scrutiny and control and to ethical review.
Amendment 216 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) As the single market is negatively impacted by the digital divide, created by lack of network access, uneven speeds between regions and lack of knowledge, the digital transformation of the society should empower citizens, especially the young digital natives, to feel secure to use new technologies, learning about privacy, security and basic safeguards that will protect them from malicious activity and increase their potential for the economy. Therefore, a comprehensive approach to increase coverage, achieve similar levels of connectivity and equal knowledge for all is needed. Moreover, the data generated by InvestEU funded projects should be kept as a source of public value and used for public policy evaluation and enhancing purposes.
Amendment 218 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a crucial role in the Union. However, they face challenges when accessing finance because of their perceived high risk and lack of sufficient collateral. Additional challenges arise from SMEs' need to stay competitive by engaging in digitisation, internationalisation and innovation activities and skilling up their workforce. Moreover, compared to larger enterprises, they have access to a more limited set of financing sources: they typically do not issue bonds, have only limited access to stock exchanges or large institutional investors. The challenge in accessing finance is even greater for those SMEs whose activities focus on intangible assets. SMEs in the Union rely heavily on banks and debt financing in the form of bank overdrafts, bank loans or leasing. Supporting SMEs that face the above challenges and providing more diversified sources of funding is necessary for increasing the ability of SMEs to finance their creation, growth and development, withstand economic downturns, and for making the economy and the financial system more resilient during economic downturn or shocks. This is also complementary to the initiatives already undertaken in the context of the Capital Markets Union. The InvestEU Fund should provide an opportunity to focus on specific, more targeted financial products. Gender disparities also need to be addressed, as female creativity and entrepreneurial potential are an under-exploited source of growth and jobs that should be further developed. Whereas women constitute 52% of the total European population, they represent only 34.4% of the EU self- employed and 30% of start-up entrepreneurs.
Amendment 223 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) As set out in the reflection paper on the social dimension of Europe16 and, the European Pillar of Social Rights17 , and the EU framework on the EU Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, building a more inclusive and fairer Union is a key priority for the Union to tackle inequality and foster social inclusion policies in Europe. Inequality of opportunities affects in particular access to education, training and health. Investment in the social, skills and human capital- related economy, as well as in the integration of vulnerable populations in the society, can enhance economic opportunities, especially if coordinated at Union level. TGiven the significant need for investment into social infrastructure and projects in the fields of social services, healthcare services, education, care and social housing, the InvestEU Fund should be used to support investment in education and training, help increase employment, in particular among the unskilled and long- term unemployed, and improve the situation with regard to gender equality, equal opportunities, intergenerational solidarity, the health sector, homelessness, digital inclusiveness, community development, the role and place of young people in society as well as vulnerable people, including third country nationals. The InvestEU Programme should also contribute to the support of European culture and creativity. To counter the profound transformations of societies in the Union and of the labour market in the coming decade, it is necessary to invest in human capital, microfinance, social enterprise finance and new social economy business models, including social impact investment and social outcomes contracting and forms of employment that support work-life balance and better distribution of care responsibilities. The InvestEU Programme should strengthen nascent social market eco-system, increasing the supply of and access to finance to micro- and social enterprises, to meet the demand of those who need it the most. The report of the High-Level Task- Force on Investing in Social Infrastructure in Europe18 has identified investment gaps in social infrastructure and services, including for education, training, health and housing, which call for support, including at the Union level. Therefore, the collective power of public, commercial and philanthropic capital, as well as support from foundations, should be harnessed to support the social market value chain development and a more resilient Union.
Amendment 224 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) Article 8 of the TFEU lays down the principle for gender mainstreaming in all EU activities. A proper implementation of gender mainstreaming requires the allocation of adequate resources and transparency in the budges lines dedicated to promote gender equality and to combat gender discrimination. The InvestEU Programme should integrate the gender perspective in all its workings and decision making processes, make sure that committees and projects teams are gender balanced and ensure that the implementation of this fund contributes to the promotion of gender equality in compliance with EU gender mainstreaming obligations.
Amendment 225 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 b (new)
Recital 17 b (new)
(17b) The projects funded under InvestEU should promote equality between women and men, in particular in research and innovation, by addressing the underlying causes of gender imbalance, by exploiting the full potential of both female and male researchers, and by integration of the gender dimension in the research and innovation content; as well as by paying particular attention to ensuring gender balance in evaluation panels and in other relevant advisory and expert bodies. Activities should also aim at implementation of principles relating to equality between women and men as laid down in Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty of the European Union, in Article 8 TFEU and Directive 2006/54/EC on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation.
Amendment 231 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Each policy window should be composed of two compartments, that is to say an EU compartment and a Member State compartment. The EU compartment should address Union-wide market and coordination failures or sub-optimal investment situations in a proportionate manner; supported actions should have a clear European added value. The Member State compartment should give Member States the possibility to contribute a share of their resources of Funds under shared management to the provisioning of the EU guarantee to use the EU guarantee for financing or investment operations to address specific market failures or sub-optimal investment situations in their own territory, including in vulnerable and remote areas such as the outermost regions of the Union, to deliver objectives of the Fund under shared management. Actions supported from the InvestEU Fund through either EU or Member State compartments should not duplicate or crowd out private financing or distort competition in the internal market. In no circumstances should the InvestEU Fund substitute for or contradict the objectives of the European Social Fund (ESF), the EU's cohesion policy, or the Europe 2020 strategy.
Amendment 238 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) The Member State compartment should be specifically designed to allow the use of funds under shared managementnational funds to provision a guarantee issued by the Union. That combination aims at mobilising the high credit rating of the Union to promote national and regional investments while ensuring a consistent risk management of the contingent liabilities by implementing the guarantee given by the Commission under indirect management. The Union should guarantee the financing and investment operations foreseen by the guarantee agreements concluded between the Commission and implementing partners under the Member State compartment, the Funds under shared managementnational Funds should provide the provisioning of the guarantee, following a provisioning rate determined by the Commission based on the nature of the operations and the resulting expected losses, and the Member State would assume losses above the expected losses by issuing a back-to-back guarantee in favour of the Union. Such arrangements should be concluded in a single contribution agreement with each Member State that voluntarily chooses such option. The contribution agreement should encompass the one or more specific guarantee agreements to be implemented within the Member State concerned. The setting out of the provisioning rate on a case by case basis requires a derogation from [Article 211(1)] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No XXXX19 (the 'Financial Regulation'). This design provides also a single set of rules for budgetary guarantees supported by funds managed centrally or by funds under shared management, which would facilitate their combination.
Amendment 241 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The InvestEU Fund should be open to contributions from third countries that are members of the European Free Trade Association, acceding countries, candidates and potential candidates, countries covered by the Neighbourhood policy and other countries, in accordance with the conditions laid down between the Union and those countries. This should allow continuing cooperating with the relevant countries, where appropriate, in particular in the fields of research and innovation as well as SMEs. Moreover, cooperation and support should be provided to decrease dependence on fossil fuels and increase access to affordable renewable energy, as well as to support access to science, technology and innovation in line with the SDGs.
Amendment 259 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24 a (new)
Recital 24 a (new)
(24a) The InvestEU Fund should be provided with an appropriate governance structure the function of which should be commensurate with its sole purpose of ensuring the appropriate use of the EU guarantee. That governance structure should be composed of an Advisory Board, a Steering Board and an Investment Committee. The Commission should assess the compatibility of investment and financing operations submitted by the implementing partners with Union law and policies via a dedicated procedure whereas the decisions on financing and investment operations should ultimately be taken by an implementing partner;
Amendment 276 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) A Project Team consisting of experts put at the disposal of the Commission by the implementing partners in order to provide professional expertise in financial and technical assessment of proposed financing and investment operations should score those submitted by the implementing partners to be assessed by the Investment CommitteeBefore a project goes to the Investment Committee, the European Commission shall assess the compatibility of investment and financing operations submitted by the implementing partners with Union law and policies. A dedicated procedure shall enable the Commission to perform a quality control of the due diligence of the proposed financing and investment operations carried out by the implementing partners. The Commission may ask for clarification to implementing partners on above-mentioned matters and shall adjust the ratings in the Scoreboard on non-financial matters accordingly.
Amendment 278 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) An Investment Committee composed of independent experts should conclude on the granting of the support from the EU guarantee to financing and investment operations fulfilling the eligibility criteria, thereby providing external expertise in investment assessments in relation to projects. The Investment Committee should have different configurations to best cover different policy areas and sectors, while it should as a general rule always include experts from climate, environmental and civil society organisations, and be gender- balanced.
Amendment 287 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) In selecting implementing partners for the deployment of the InvestEU Fund, the Commission should consider the counterpart's capacity to fulfil the objectives of the InvestEU Fund and contribute its own resources, in order to ensure adequate geographical coverage and diversification, to crowd-in private investors and to provide sufficient risk diversification as well as new solutions to address market and coordination failures and sub-optimal investment situations. Given its role under the Treaties, its capacity to operate in all Member States and the existing experience under the current financial instruments and the EFSI, the European Investment Bank (‘EIB’) Group should remain a privileged implementing partner under the InvestEU Fund's EU compartment. In addition to the EIB Group, national promotional banks or institutions should be able to offer a complementary financial product range given that their experience and capabilities at regional level could be beneficial for the maximisation of the impact of public funds on the territory of the Union and to ensure a fair geographical balance of projects, contributing to reducing regional disparities. Moreover, it should be possible to have other international financial institutions as implementing partners, in particular when they present a comparative advantage in terms of specific expertise and experience in certain Member States. It should also be possible for other entities fulfilling the criteria laid down in the Financial Regulation to act as implementing partners.
Amendment 299 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) In order to ensure that interventions under the EU compartment of the InvestEU Fund focus on market and coordination failures and sub- optimal investment situations at Union level, but, at the same time, satisfy the objectives of best possible geographic outreach, the EU guarantee should be allocated to implementing partners, which alone or together with other implementing partners, can cover at least three Member States. However, it is expected that around 75 % of the EU guarantee under the EU compartment would be allocated to implementing partner or partners that can offer financial products under the InvestEU Fund in all Member States.
Amendment 306 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) The InvestEU Fund should, where appropriate, allow for a smooth and efficient blending of grants or financial instruments, or both, funded by the Union budget or by the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Innovation Fund with that guarantee in situations where this is necessary to best underpin investments to address particular market and coordination failures or sub- optimal investment situations.
Amendment 307 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) The InvestEU Advisory Hub should support the development of a robust pipeline of investment projects in each policy window, providing for effective implementation of geographic diversification with a view to contributing to the Union objective of economic, social, and territorial cohesion and reducing regional disparities. The Advisory Hub should pay particular attention to the necessity of aggregating small projects and bundle them into larger portfolios. In addition, a cross- sectoral component under the InvestEU Programme should be foreseen to ensure a single-entry point and cross-policy project development assistance for centrally managed Union programmes.
Amendment 316 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37 a (new)
Recital 37 a (new)
(37a) Given the positive track record of national promotional banks in generating, bundling and financing projects, for example on small scale energy efficiency and renewable energy projects on a local and regional level, their expertise should be pooled into advisory hubs and their role as implementing partners should continue to be valued.
Amendment 319 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44
Recital 44
(44) Third countries which are members of the European Economic Area (EEA) may participate in Union programmes in the framework of the cooperation established under the EEA agreement, which provides for the implementation of the programmes by a decision under that agreement. Third countries may also participate on the basis of other legal instruments. A specific provision should be introduced in this Regulation to grant the necessary rights for and access to the authorising officer responsible, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) as well as the European Court of Auditors to comprehensively exert their respective competences and guarantee the rights of the Union to ensure sound financial management and to protect its financial interests.
Amendment 324 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) The InvestEU Programme should address EU-wide market and coordination failures and sub- optimal investment situations and provide for Union-wide market testing of innovative financial products, and systems to spread them, for new or complex market failures. Therefore, action at Union level is warranted,
Amendment 326 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
This Regulation also establishes an advisory support mechanism to support the development of investable and sustainable projects and access to financing and to provide related capacity building (‘InvestEU Advisory Hub’). It also establishes a database granting visibility to projects for which project promoters seek financing and which provides investors with information about investment opportunities (‘InvestEU Portal’).
Amendment 333 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
(4a) 'energy efficiency first' means taking utmost account, in energy planning, policy and investment decisions, of alternative cost-efficient energy efficiency measures to make energy demand and energy supply more efficient, in particular by means of cost-effective energy end-use savings, demand-side response initiatives and more efficient conversion, transmission and distribution of energy, whilst still achieving the objectives of the respective decisions.
Amendment 335 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Amendment 348 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Amendment 363 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the sustainability of the Union economy and its growth, including climate change mitigation and adaptation;
Amendment 372 #
2018/0229(COD)
(da) achieving the climate objectives and international commitments of the Union, as well as delivering long-term environmental and societal benefits.
Amendment 373 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) to support financing and investment operations in researchinclusive and ethical research, product development, innovation and digitisation;
Amendment 381 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) to support building renovation, including but not limited to refurbishment of building projects, investment platforms, pre-financing schemes contributing to the renovation of buildings focused on energy savings, the deployment of decentralised renewable energy and the integration of buildings into a connected energy, storage, digital and transport system
Amendment 391 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
An additional amount of the EU guarantee may be provided for the purposes of the Member State compartment referred to in point (b) of Article 8(1), subject to the allocation by Member States, pursuant to [Article 10(1)] of Regulation [[CPR] number]28 and Article [75(1)] of Regulation [[CAP plan] number]29 , of the corresponding amounts.
Amendment 399 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The financial envelope for the implementation of the measures provided in Chapters V and VI shall be EUR 5725 000 000 (current prices).
Amendment 402 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The InvestEU Fund shall operate through the following fourive policy windows that shall address market and coordination failures or sub- optimal investment situations within their specific scope:
Amendment 405 #
2018/0229(COD)
(a) sustainable infrastructure policy window: comprises sustainable investment in the areas of transport, energy, digital connectivity, supply and processing of raw materials, space, oceans and water, wasteincluding the maintenance or upgrade of existing infrastructure, energy - in particular, the increased deployment of renewable energy, electricity interconnection and energy efficiency investments-, digital connectivity, climate adaptation and mitigation, recycling and processing of raw materials, space, water, waste, avoidance, recycling and reduction and the circular economy, nature and other environment infrastructure, equipment, mobile assets and deployment of innovative technologies that contribute to the environmental or social sustainability objectives of the Union, or to both, orand meet the environmental or social sustainability standards of the Union;
Amendment 410 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) building renovation policy window: comprises finance of individual or aggregated refurbishment of buildings projects, investment platforms, pre- financing schemes with on-bill or on-tax repayment contributing to the renovation of buildings focused on energy savings, the deployment of decentralised renewable energy and the integration of buildings into a connected energy, storage digital and transport system.
Amendment 413 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) research, innovation and digitisation policy window: comprises research, product development and innovation activities, transfer of research and technologies results to the market and public institutions, supporting market enablers and cooperation between enterprises, including regulatory systems, demonstration and deployment of innovative solutions and support to scaling up of innovative companies other than SMEs with regard to the net-zero carbon economy, resilience and adaptation to climate change, on the circular economy, as well as digitisation of Union industry;
Amendment 416 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) SMEs policy window: access to and availability of finance for SMEs and, in duly justified cases, for small mid-cap companies, in particular to environment- friendly production processes, resource and energy efficiency and other climate relevant projects, and female entrepreneurship;
Amendment 421 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Financing and investment operations under the sustainable infrastructureall policy windows referred to in point (a) of paragraph (1) shall be subject to climate, environmental and social sustainability proofing and tracking, through minimum sustainability thresholds in the project scoreboards, with a view to minimise detrimental impacts and maximise benefits on climate, environment and social dimension. For that purpose, promoters requesting financing shall provide adequate information based on guidance to be developed by the Commission. Projects below a certain size defined in the guidance shall be excluded from the proofingThe Commission shall be empowered to adopt this guidance in the form of a delegated act in accordance with article 26, taking fully into account the criteria established by the [Regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment] for determining whether an economic activity is environmentally sustainable, and in line with EU climate objectives.
Amendment 426 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
The Commission guidance shall go beyond current carbon pricing and CO2 footprint methodologies and allow to:
Amendment 428 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) as regards adaptation, ensure the resilience to the potential adverse impacts of climate change through a climate vulnerability and risk assessment, including relevant adaptation measures, and, as regards mitigation, integrate the cost of greenhouse gas emissions and the positive effects of climate mitigation measures in the cost-benefit analysis, and ensure compliance with the EU environmental objectives and standards;
Amendment 430 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) account for consolidated project impact in terms of the principal components of the natural capital relating to air, water, land, soil and biodiversity;
Amendment 431 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) rule out support for any fossil fuel infrastructure, including related to production, processing, transmission, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels;
Amendment 433 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b b (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b b (new)
(bb) rule out support for projects leading to significant greenhouse gas emissions accounted in line with improved greenhouse gasses emission accounting system for the entire project lifecycle assessment compatible with the 1.5ºC objective of the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 434 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b c (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 – point b c (new)
(bc) undertake an assessment whether cost-efficient, technically, economically and environmentally sound alternative energy efficiency measures, by means of cost-effective energy end-use savings, demand-side response initiatives and more efficient conversion, transmission and distribution of energy, could replace in whole or in part the proposed operation whilst still achieving the objectives of the respective undertaking, in line with the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union;
Amendment 436 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. Implementing partners shall provide the information necessary to allow the tracking of investment that contributes to meeting the Union objectives on climate and environment, based on the guidance to be provided by the Commission in accordance with paragraph (3), fully complying with the criteria established by [Regulation on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment] for determining whether an economic activity is environmentally sustainable and being complementary to the role of the Platform on sustainable finance which shall monitor and report regularly to the Commission on capital flows towards sustainable investments..
Amendment 438 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Implementing partners shall targetensure that at least 560 % of the overall investment under the sustainable infrastructure policy window contributes to meeting the Union objectives on climate and environment in line with the EU commitments made under the Paris Agreement.
Amendment 440 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. As to ensure the climate mainstreaming objectives stipulated in this Regulation are fulfilled, the Commission shall put in place a centrally managed system for climate tracking for allocated resources and the actual spending based on the Rio Marker system, differentiating between mitigation and adaptation and the different sectors and its GHG emissions reduction.
Amendment 441 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5 b (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. As to ensure required level of financing, at least 10% of the investment under InvestEU policy windows and in both EU and Member State compartments must be allocated for the "Environment and resources" eligible area.
Amendment 455 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Each policy window referred to in Article 7(1) shall consist of two compartments addressing specific market and coordination failures or sub-optimal investment situations as follows:
Amendment 461 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) market and coordination failures or sub-optimal investment situations related to Union policy priorities and addressed at the Union level;
Amendment 463 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) Union wide market and coordination failures or sub- optimal investment situations; or
Amendment 464 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) new or complex market and coordination failures or sub-optimal investment situations with a view to developing new financial solutions and market structures;
Amendment 467 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the Member State compartment shall address specific market and coordination failures or sub-optimal investment situations in one or several Member States to deliver objectives of the contributing Funds under shared management.
Amendment 469 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 26 to define market and coordination failures and sub-optimal investment situations referred to in paragraph 1 after receiving advice from the Advisory board.
Amendment 473 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Amendment 482 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 483 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the overall amount of the part of the EU guarantee under the Member State compartment pertaining to the Member State, its provisioning rate, the amount of the contribution from Funds under shared managementnational Funds, the constitution phase of the provisioning in accordance with an annual financial plan and the amount of the resulting contingent liability to be covered by a back-to-back guarantee provided by the Member State concerned;
Amendment 486 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) identified market and coordination failures and sub-optimal investment situations which should be addressed by the financed operations;
Amendment 488 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point d
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) the possible contribution from Funds under shared managementnational Funds to the InvestEU Advisory Hub;
Amendment 491 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Where, within nine months from the signature of the contribution agreement, no guarantee agreement has been concluded or the amount of a contribution agreement is not fully committed through one or more guarantee agreements, the contribution agreement shall be terminated in the first case or amended accordingly in the second case and the unused amount of provisioning re-used pursuant to [Article 10(5)] of Regulation [[CPR] number] and Article [75(5)] of Regulation [[CAP plan] number].
Amendment 492 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 493 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) after the constitution phase referred to in point (a) of paragraph 3 of this Article, any annual surplus of provisions, calculated by comparing the amount of provisions required by the provisioning rate and the actual provisions, shall be re- used pursuant to [Article 10(6)] of the [CPR] and to Article [75(6)] of the [[CAP plan] number];
Amendment 518 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10 a (new)
Article 10a Additionality For the purposes of this Regulation, and without prejudice to Article 209(2) of the Financial Regulation, 'additionality' means the support by the Invest EU Fund of operations which address market and coordination failures or sub-optimal investment situations, such as long-term return on investment or higher risk financing needs for projects delivering longer-term environmental and societal benefits, and which could not have been carried out during the period in which the EU guarantee can be used, or not to the same extent, by implementing partners without InvestEU fund support. Projects supported by the InvestEU Fund shall support the objectives laid down in Article 3, shall strive to create long-term employment, public infrastructure, sustainable growth and contribute to achieving the climate objectives of the EU.
Amendment 521 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The InvestEU Fund shall only support financing and investment operations, both public and private, that
Amendment 522 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) comply with the conditions set out in article 10a and [points (a) to (e) of Article 209(2)] of [the Financial Regulation], in particular with the additionality requirement set out in [point (b) of Article 209(2)] of [the Financial Regulation] and, where appropriate, maximising private investment in accordance with [point (d) of Article 209(2)] of the [Financial Regulation];
Amendment 524 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) contribute to social, climate and environmental policy objectives of the Union;
Amendment 525 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) contribute to, complement and are consistent with the Union policy objectives and fall under the scope of the areas eligible for financing and investment operations under the appropriate window in accordance with Annex II to this Regulation; and
Amendment 526 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) are economically and financially viable, while taking into account the specific operating environment;
Amendment 527 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(cb) are technically viable and are sustainable from an environmental and social point of view, in accordance with Annex III to this Regulation;
Amendment 528 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The InvestEU Fund shall not support activities related to the production, processing, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels or CO2 transport infrastructure;
Amendment 529 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. The InvestEU Fund shall not support activities related to the development of the defence industry;
Amendment 548 #
2018/0229(COD)
(f) promotes innovating financial and risk solutions to address market and coordination failures and sub-optimal investment situations.
Amendment 551 #
2018/0229(COD)
(fa) achieves additionality as set out in Article 10a.
Amendment 552 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the capacity of the implementing partner to implement thoroughly the requirements of [Articles 155(2) and 155(3)] of the [Financial Regulation] related to tax avoidance, tax fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, terrorism financing and non- cooperative jurisdictions.
Amendment 557 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. National promotional banks or institutions, including local and regional promotional banks or institutions, may be selected as implementing partners, subject to fulfilling the requirements laid down in this Article and in the second subparagraph of Article 14(1).
Amendment 569 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for equity or quasi-equity investments referred to in Article 13(1)(a), the amounts invested and their associated funding cost and losses arising from fluctuations of currencies other than the euro where possibilities for long-term hedging are limited;
Amendment 573 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article -17 (new)
Article -17 (new)
Article -17 All bodies participating in the decision- making and selection of projects, including the advisory board, the project team and the investment committee shall act according to the principles of transparency, integrity, accountability and guaranteed stakeholder participation, including from civil society organisations. They shall be gender-balanced and composed of independent experts from various technical backgrounds, including climate experts. Information on projects, selection procedure and decision-making, including the minutes of meetings, shall be published on a dedicated website, with the exception of commercially sensitive information, which upon request must be made available to the Members of the European Parliament and staff of political groups in a securitised reading room.
Amendment 588 #
2018/0229(COD)
(ii) provide advice to the Commission about market and coordination failures and sub-optimal investment situations and market conditions;
Amendment 607 #
Amendment 608 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Amendment 611 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Amendment 614 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 616 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Amendment 617 #
2018/0229(COD)
Amendment 619 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 620 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c
(c) the respect of the eligibility criteria, including the compliance with the EU environmental standards, with the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and with the Energy Union's "Energy Efficiency first" principle.
Amendment 623 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) the quality and contribution of the investment operation to sustainable growth and employment;
Amendment 624 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c b (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c b (new)
(cb) the contribution of the investment operation to the realisation of InvestEU Programme objectives;
Amendment 627 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c c (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c c (new)
(cc) the technical and financial contribution to the project;
Amendment 628 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c d (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 – point c d (new)
(cd) whether the proposed operation addresses the identified market and coordination failures or sub-optimal investment situations.
Amendment 629 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
Article 18 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
Each implementing partner shall provide adequate and harmonised information to the project teamCommission in order for it to be able to carry out its risk analysis and prepare the scoreboard.
Amendment 631 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 5
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. A project team expert shall not assess the due diligence or appraisal relating to a potential financing or investment operation submitted by the implementing partner that has put the expert at the disposal of the Commission. That expert shall also not prepare the scoreboard in relation to those proposals.Where necessary, the Commission may provide assistance to implementing partners in the application of the risk assessment methodology and in the compilation of the scoreboard. It shall ensure that scoring methodology is properly applied and that the scoreboards presented to the Investment Committee are of high quality. The Commission shall, following its compliance and due diligence check, adjust the ratings of the scoreboard on non-financial matters before the scoreboard goes to the Investment Committee
Amendment 632 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 6
Article 18 – paragraph 6
Amendment 633 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7
Article 18 – paragraph 7
Amendment 634 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 8
Article 18 – paragraph 8
Amendment 641 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) verify their compliance with this Regulation and the relevant investment guidelines, giving particular attention to the additionality requirement referred to in [Article 209(2)(b)] of the [Financial Regulation] and to the requirement, where appropriate, to crowd in private investment referred to in [Article 209(2)(d)] of the [Financial Regulation]; and
Amendment 642 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) verify their compliance with the specific additionality requirement set out in Article 10a
Amendment 644 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The Investment Committee shall meet in fourive different configurations, corresponding to the policy windows referred to in Article 7 (1).
Amendment 651 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Four members shall be permanent members of all fourive configurations of the Investment Committee. In addition, the fourive configurations shall each have two experts with experience in investment in sectors covered by that policy window. At least one of the permanent members shall have expertise in sustainable investment. The Commission shall assign the Investment Committee members to its appropriate configuration or configurations. The Investment Committee shall elect a chairperson from among its permanent members.
Amendment 671 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Conclusions of the Investment Committee approving the support of the EU guarantee to a financing or investment operation shall be publicly accessible and shall include the rationale for the approval. The publication shall not contain commercially sensitive information, which nevertheless must be made available upon request to Members of the European Parliament and staff of political groups in a securitised reading room.
Amendment 675 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
The scoreboard shall be publicly available after the signature of a financing or investment operation or sub-project, if applicable. The publication shall not contain commercially sensitive informationbefore the approval of the investment operation. The publication shall not contain commercially sensitive information, which nevertheless must be made available upon request to Members of the European Parliament and staff of political groups in a securitised reading room; or personal data not to be disclosed under the Union data protection rules.
Amendment 689 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
The InvestEU Advisory Hub shall provide advisory support at a regional and local level to promote projects with a climate, environmental and social impact and in line with the 'Energy Efficiency first' principle. Such support should also include a communication and a project development assistance component to continue building more capacity to develop sustainable projects and to aggregate smaller projects into larger ones.
Amendment 702 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4
Article 20 – paragraph 4
4. FCommensurate fees may be charged for the services referred to in paragraph 2 to cover part of the costs for providing those services.
Amendment 716 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall report on the implementation of InvestEU Programme in accordance with [Articles 241 and 250] of the [Financial Regulation]. For that purpose, the implementing partners shall provide annually the information necessary to allow the Commission to comply with its reporting obligations. As part of the annual reporting, the Commission shall carry out annually, a robust, multi-annual consolidation exercise to identify whether climate expenditure is on track to achieve the 60% target. The Commission shall provide information on the scale and results of support to climate change objectives differentiating between mitigation and adaptation as well as information on the climate contribution of relevant financial instruments, and make this publicly available.
Amendment 718 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. In addition, each implementing partner shall submit every six months a report to the Commission on the financing and investment operations covered by this Regulation, broken down by the EU compartment and the Member State compartment by Member State, as appropriate. The report shall include an assessment of compliance with the requirements on the use of the EU guarantee and with the key performance indicators laid down in Annex III to this Regulation. The report shall also include operational, statistical, financial and accounting data on each financing and investment operation and at the compartment, policy window and the InvestEU Fund level. One of those reports shall contain the information the implementing partners shall provide in accordance with [Article 155(1)(a)] of the [Financial Regulation]. The Commission shall compile and assess implementing partners' reports and submit a summary in the form of public annual reports, providing information on the level of implementation of the programme against its objectives and performance indicators, indicating risks and opportunities for the financing and investment operations supported by the InvestEU Programme.
Amendment 722 #
2018/0229(COD)
5a. The Commission shall publish on its web portal information on financing and investment operations, including information on expected impacts and benefits of the projects, taking into account the protection of confidential and commercially sensitive information. The web portal shall also provide public access to a registry of eligible counterparts. In accordance with relevant transparency policies and Union rules on data protection and on access to documents and information, the implementing partners and other recipients of Union funds shall pro-actively and systematically make publicly available on their websites information relating to all financing and investment operations covered by this programme, relating in particular to the manner in which those projects contribute to the achievement of the objectives and requirements of this Regulation. Such information shall always take into account the protection of confidential and commercially sensitive information. Implementing partners shall make public Union support in all information, which they publish on financing and investment operations covered by this programme in accordance with this Regulation.
Amendment 732 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. By 30 September 20254, the Commission shall carry out an interim evaluation on the InvestEU Programme, in particular on the use of the EU guarantee.
Amendment 738 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. At the end of the implementation of the InvestEU Programme, but no later than fourone years after the end of the period specified in Article 1, the Commission shall carry out a final evaluation of the InvestEU Programme, in particular on the use of the EU guarantee.
Amendment 740 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 1
Audits on the use of the Union funding carried out by persons or entities, including by others than those mandated by the Union institutions or bodies, shall form the basis of the overall assurance pursuant to [Article 127] of the [Financial Regulation]. The guarantee, payments and recoveries under it, and operations under the InvestEU Programme shall be audited by the Court of Auditors. A special report by the Court of Auditors should be issued 18 months after the entry into force of this regulation.
Amendment 746 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point a
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) up to EUR 11 500 000 00025% of the overall financial envelope indicated in article 4.1 for objectives referred to in point (a) of Article 3(2);
Amendment 750 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) up to EUR 11 250 000 00020% of the overall financial envelope indicated in article 4.1 for objectives referred to in point (b) of Article 3(2);
Amendment 754 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point c
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) up to EUR 11 250 000 00020% of the overall financial envelope indicated in article 4.1 for objectives referred to in point (c) of Article 3(2);
Amendment 760 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point d
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) up to EUR 4 000 000 00015% of the overall financial envelope indicated in article 4.1 for objectives referred to in point (d) of Article 3(2).
Amendment 766 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) up to EUR 20% of the overall financial envelope indicated in article 4.1. for objectives referred to in point (d new) of Article 3(2).
Amendment 767 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex II – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The financing and investment operations may fall under one or more ofshall be limited to the following areas:
Amendment 769 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – introductory part
1. Development of the energy sector, excluding activities related to production, processing, transmission, distribution, storage or combustion of fossil fuels, in accordance with the Energy Union priorities, including security of energy supply, and the commitments taken under the Agenda 2030 and the Paris Agreement, in particular through:
Amendment 770 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) expansion and acceleration of the generation, deployment, supply or use of clean and sustainable renewable energy;
Amendment 772 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c
(c) development, smartening and modernisation of sustainable energy infrastructure, including electricity interconnection (transmission and distribution level, storage technologies);
Amendment 773 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point d
(d) production and supply of synthetic fuels from renewable/carbon-neutral sources; alternative fuels sources under the condition of a positive lifecycle impact and efficiency assessment;
Amendment 774 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point e
Amendment 776 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
2. Development of sustainable transport infrastructures, excluding motorways, expressways and airports, and equipment and innovative technologies in accordance with Union transport priorities and the commitments taken under the Paris Agreement, in particular through:
Amendment 777 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) sustainable projects supporting development of the TEN-T infrastructure and small-scale projects, including its urban nodes, when targeted to multimodality and zero-emission technologies, sustainable maritime and inland ports, multimodal terminals and their connection to the main networks, as well as cross sectorial projects at those ports and terminals such as waste and water recycling and integrated electricity charging stations for ships when at berth;
Amendment 778 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
(b) smart and sustainable urban mobility projects (targeting lowzero-emission urban transport modes, accessibility, air pollution and noise, energy consumption and accidents);
Amendment 779 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
(c) supporting the renewal and retrofitting of transport mobile assets with the view of deploying lowzero-emission mobility solutions;
Amendment 780 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d
(d) railway infrastructure, other rail projects, andincluding regional cross-border missing links that were dismantled or abandoned in the past and sustainable maritime ports;
Amendment 781 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point e
(e) alternative fuels infrastructure, including electric charging infrastructure.
Amendment 783 #
2018/0229(COD)
(ea) maintenance or upgrades of existing infrastructure assets, in transport and energy sectors, with particular focus on EU long-term transport, energy and climate objectives;
Amendment 786 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
(c) projects and enterprises in the fields of environmental resource management and cleansustainable technologies;
Amendment 787 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point f
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point f
(f) climate change actions, including natural hazard disaster risk reduction, climate adaptation and mitigation;
Amendment 788 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point g
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point g
(g) projects and enterprises that implement circular economy by integrating resource and energy efficiency aspects in the production and product life-cycle, including the sustainable supplyrecycling of primary and secondary raw materials;
Amendment 789 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point h
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point h
(h) decarbonisation of and substantial reduction of emissions of energy-intensive industries, including large-scale demonstration of CCU innovative low-zero- emission technologies and their deployment.
Amendment 792 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
(a) research, including research infrastructure and support to academia, product development and innovation projects contributing to the objectives of [Horizon Europe];
Amendment 793 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d
(d) collaboration projects between academia and industry, industry, public enterprises and civil society, including patient and end- user organisations;
Amendment 794 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point f
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point f
(f) new effectivand improved effective, accessible and affordable healthcare products, including pharmaceuticals, vaccines, medical devices, diagnostics and advanced therapy medicinal products and new antimicrobials and innovative development processes that avoid using animal testing.
Amendment 795 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
(a) ethical artificial intelligence subject to prior assessment;
Amendment 796 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point d
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point d
(d) blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies;
Amendment 797 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point e
(e) advanceding digital skills;
Amendment 798 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 7 – introductory part
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 7 – introductory part
7. Financial support to entities employing up to 3 000 employees, with a particular focus on SMEs and small mid- cap companies, in particular through:
Amendment 800 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point b a (new)
(ba) female entrepreneurship
Amendment 804 #
Amendment 805 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c a (new)
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point c a (new)
(ca) promotion of gender equality;
Amendment 806 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point h
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point h
(h) innovative health solutions, including e-health, health services and new care models;
Amendment 807 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 12
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 12
Amendment 814 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point 3.2
Annex III – point 3 – point 3.2
3.2 Investment supporting climate objectives, detailed per policy window and category, as well as share of climate relevance;
Amendment 817 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 3 – point 3.3 a (new)
Annex III – point 3 – point 3.3 a (new)
3.3a Absolute and relative greenhouse gasses emission
Amendment 818 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.2
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.2
4.2 Energy: Number of households with improved energy consumption classification, number of households renovated to NZEB and passive house standard;
Amendment 819 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.2 a (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.2 a (new)
4.2a Energy: energy saved
Amendment 820 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.2 b (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.2 b (new)
4.2b Energy: absolute and relative greenhouse gasses emission
Amendment 821 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.4
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.4
4.4 Transport: Investment mobilised in TEN-T of which: TEN-T core, small-scale projects, other;
Amendment 822 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.4 a (new)
Annex III – point 4 – point 4.4 a (new)
4.4a Transport: absolute and relative greenhouse gasses emission
Amendment 823 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 5 – point 5.2 a (new)
Annex III – point 5 – point 5.2 a (new)
5.2a Contribution to tackling Global Societal Challenges within Horizon Europe: 'Health and well-being', 'Inclusive society', 'Resilient society', 'Sustainable food', 'Natural resources and the Environment';
Amendment 824 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 6 – introductory part
Annex III – point 6 – introductory part
6. Gender disaggregated data on SMEs
Amendment 825 #
2018/0229(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – point 7 – introductory part
Annex III – point 7 – introductory part
7. Gender disaggregated data on Social Investment and Skills
Amendment 22 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) To achieve the Union's and international climate objectives, climate action targets should overall not be lower than 30%. In order to address the European Court of Auditors recommendations, compulsory climate action targets should be laid out in programme specific legislations and require ex-ante earmarking in all programming and planning processes rather than ex-post accounting. Climate mainstreaming and climate proofing mechanisms should be unified by reforming, expanding and centralizing the Rio Marker system, in order to differentiate between mitigation and adaptation, and between sectors; and by 'Energy Efficiency first' assessments during infrastructure investment planning, as set out in the Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union, as well as clear exclusion criteria. Performance frameworks should be based on adequate and elaborate output and result indicators, showing the level of ambition and putting results into perspective of national needs, objectives and opportunities.
Amendment 23 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21a) Article 8 TFEU lays down the principle of gender mainstreaming in all EU activities. A proper implementation of gender mainstreaming requires the allocation of adequate resources and transparency in the budget lines dedicated to promote gender equality and to combat gender discrimination.
Amendment 64 #
2018/0216(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 93 – paragraph 1
Article 93 – paragraph 1
Each Member State shall establish a single CAP Strategic Plan for its entire territory. The new Strategic Plan shall be region specific, and it shall be designed in cooperation with or by regional authorities, fully taking into account the specificities of each territory.
Amendment 43 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Strengthening economic cohesion amongst Member States whose currency is the euro would contribute to the stability of the monetary union and, to the harmonious development and the upwards convergence of the Union as a whole.
Amendment 55 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The unprecedented financial crisis and economic downturn that hit the world and the euro area has shown that in the euro area available instruments such as the single monetary policy, the EU fiscal framework, automatic fiscal stabilisers and discretionary fiscal policy measures at national level are insufficient to absorb large asymmetric shocks.
Amendment 62 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In order to facilitate macroeconomic adjustment and cushion large asymmetric shocks in the current institutional set-up, Member States whose currency is the euro and other Member States that participate in the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II) have to rely more heavily on remaining instruments of economic policy, such as automatic fiscal stabilisers and other discretionary fiscal measures, making the adjustment more difficult overall. The sequence of the crisis in euro area also suggestsputs in evidence a strong reliance on the single monetary policy to provide for macro-economic stabilisation in severe macro-economic circumstances.
Amendment 65 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The financial crisis has resulted in and has been aggravated by a pro-cyclical pattern for fiscal policies, which has been detrimental to the quality of public finances and in particular for public investment. In turn, that shortcoming has contributed to widespread differences in macroeconomic performance between Member States, imperilling cohesion.
Amendment 68 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Additional instruments are therefore necessary to avoid in the future that large asymmetric shocks result into deeper and broader situations of stress and weaken cohesion. Together with the gradual establishment such additional instruments and in order to facilitate macroeconomic adjustment, the revision of the EU fiscal framework should also be a priority as the current framework rules contributed to excessive fiscal austerity during the crisis, thus helping to aggravate and prolong its economic, social and political consequences. Moreover, either because countries did not abide by the rules or because the rules were not sufficiently strictly applied during good years, there was insufficient debt reduction in many countries in the 2000s, which reduced their fiscal capacity during bad years. In addition, the rules suffered from large measurement problems as they are based on the non- observable structural budget balance, the estimation of which is subject to massive errors.
Amendment 75 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) In particular, in order to support Member States whose currency is the euro to respond better to rapidly changing economic circumstances and stabilise their economy by preserving public investments in line with the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate agreement, in the event of large asymmetric shocks, a European Investment Stabilisation Function (EISF) should be established as a first step towards a fully-fledged capacity to address asymmetric shocks in the EMU.
Amendment 78 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The EISF should be bound by the same objectives than the one included in the Article 4.1 of the regulation laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum and Migration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Border Management and Visa Instrument.
Amendment 88 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) EISF should be a Union instrument which complements national fiscal policies. It should be recalled that Member States should pursue sound fiscal policies and build up fiscal buffers in favourable economic times and facilitate counter- cyclical macroeconomic adjustment in bad times. Member States should also pursue in that perspective an upwards fiscal convergence and the fight against fiscal and social dumping.
Amendment 100 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) The European Stability Mechanism (ESM) or its legal successor cshould provide further support in addition to support under EISF.
Amendment 106 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) EISF support should be given in case one or several Member States whose currency is the euro or other Member States that participate in the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II) are confronted with a large asymmetric shock. Changes in unemployment rates are highly correlated with business cycle fluctuations in such Member States. Strong increases in national unemployment rates above their long-term averages are a clear indicator of a large shock in a specific Member State. Asymmetric shocks affect one or several Member States significantly more strongly than the average of Member States.
Amendment 109 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The activation of EISF support should therefore be determined by a doublen activation trigger based on both the level of national unemployment rate compared to its past average and, the change in unemployment compared to a certain threshold or a change in a leading indicator to anticipate turning point in economic activity.
Amendment 118 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Strict eEligibility criteria for grants could be partially based on compliance with decisions and recommendations under the Union's fiscal and economic surveillance framework over a period of two years before the request for EISF support should be fulfilled by the Member State requesting EISF support in in order not to diminish the incentive for that Member State to pursue prudent budgetary policies.
Amendment 121 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
Amendment 129 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 132 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) EISF support should take the form of grants ofr loans to the Member States concerned. That instrument would provide them with financing to continue executing public investments particularly those in line with the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate agreement.
Amendment 136 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In addition to grants and loans, interest rate subsidies should be granted to the Member States concerned to cover the interest costs incurred on such loans, as a specific type of financial assistance under Article 220 of the Financial Regulation. Such an interest rate subsidy would provide additional support in parallel to the loan for Member States undergoing an asymmetric shock and facing tight financing conditions on the financial markets whenever such Member State is not fully eligible for a grant.
Amendment 139 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) With a view to swiftly provide EISF support, the competence for granting the loans when the eligibility and activation criteria arefor grants are not fulfilled and deciding on granting interest rate subsidies should be entrusted to the Commission.
Amendment 143 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Member States should invest the support received under EISF in eligible public investment and also maintain the level of public investment in general compared to the averagehigher level of public investments over the five last years in order to ensure that the objective pursued by this Regulation is achieved. In that respect, there is the expectation that Member States should give priority to maintaining eligible investment in programmes supported by the Union under the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion fund, the European Social Fund, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development..
Amendment 145 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) To that effect, the Commission should examine whether the Member State concerned has respected those conditions. In case of non-compliance the Member State concerned should be subject to exclusion of additional grants for a period of two years or repay part or the entire loan given and should not be entitled to receiving an interest rate subsidy.
Amendment 162 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) A Stabilisation Support Fund should be established to finance the interest rate subsidy. The Stabilisation Support Fund should be endowed with national contributions fromreimburse the borrowing operations due by the EISF endowed with annual payment appropriations from the EU budget within the limits of the multiannual financial framework and a financial envelope of EUR 120000 million foreseen for the implementation of the Stabilisation Support Fund with the aim of covering the reimbursement of borrowing operations carried by the EISF. Such payments should be topped up with national contributions from Member States whose currency is the euro and other Member States that participate in the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II) which experience a current account surplus for a third year in a row. The amount of such contribution should be calculated as the difference between the current account and the maximum threshold whenever a Member State exceeds for a third year in a row the maximum threshold of the current account indicator provided in the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure scoreboard established to in Regulation (EU) 1176/2011. The determination and the transfer of such national contributions should be governed by an intergovernmental agreement to be concluded between Member States whose currency is the euro and other Member States that participate in the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II).
Amendment 166 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Both the determination of the amount of the national contributions to the Stabilisation Support Fund and their transfer should be governed by an intergovernmental agreement to be concluded betweenA new Own Resource within the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework should be established by Member States whose currency is the euro and for other Member States that participate in the exchange rate mechanism (ERM II). That agreement should provide that the national contributions for all the Member States are calculated basedreferred to in Article 140(1) onf the share of the national central banks of those Member States whose currency is the euro in the monetary income of the Eurosystem. For Member States which participate in ERM II a specific key should be foreseen to determine the national contributions. The Commission should assist the Member States for the calculation of those contributions. To that end, the European Central Bank (ECB) should communicate to the Commission the amount of monetary income the national central banks of the Eurosystem are entitled toTreaty of the Functioning of the European Union. Such Own Resource should provide an amount equivalent to be overall financial envelope of the Stabilisation Support Fund.
Amendment 175 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) After that intergovernmental agreement has entered into force, payment of the interest rate subsidy to the Member State concerned should be conditional upon the Member State transferring its yearly contribution to the Stabilisation Support FuGrants and. Payment of interest rate subsidies should be conditional upon the availability of sufficient means in the Stabilisation Support Fund. Grants and Payment of interest rates subsidies from the Stabilisation Support Fund would be postponed in case the interest rate subsidysuch amounts allocated to a specific Member State would exceed 30 percent of the available means in the Stabilisation Support Fund at the moment when such payment is due.
Amendment 184 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) In order to determine the rules for the involvement of the ESM or its legal successor in providing financial assistance in parallel to the Commission in support of public investment, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the exchange of relevant information as regards the EISF loansupport, the impact of the ESM's involvement for calculating the amount of EISF support, and the granting of an interest rate subsidy by theinvolvement of Stabilisation Support Fund to the Member State forregarding costs incurred on ESM financial assistance. The Commission should also be empowered to adopt delegated acts determining the percentage in the formula for calculating the interest rate subsidy, the detailed rules for the administration of the Stabilisation Support Fund and the general principles and criteria for its investment strategy. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 201614. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. _________________ 14 OJ L 231, 12.5.2016, p. 1. OJ L 231, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 186 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Pursuant to paragraph 22 and 23 of the Inter-institutional agreement for Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016, there is a need to evaluate this Regulation in order in particular to assess its effectiveness, its contribution to the conduct of economic policies in Member States and the Union's strategy for jobs and growth, and to determine possible further developments that are needed in order to create an fully-fledged insurance mechanism serving the purpose of macro-economic stabilisation. This will be done on the basis of information collected through specific monitoring requirements, while avoiding overregulation and administrative burdens, in particular on Member States. These requirements, where appropriate, can include measurable indicators, as a basis for evaluating the effects of the Regulation on the ground.
Amendment 193 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) EISF should be considered as a first step in the development over time of a fully-fledged insurance mechanism to cater for macro-economic stabilisation. Currently, EISF would be based on logrants and granting ofloans providing interest rate subsidies. In parallel, it is not excluded that the ESM or its legal successor would be involved in the future by providing financial assistance to Member States whose currency is the euro facing adverse economic conditions in support of public investment. Moreover, a voluntaryfully-fledged insurance mechanism with a borrowing capacity based on voluntary contributions by Member States cshould be set up in the future to provide for a powerful instrument for the purpose of macro-economic stabilisation against asymmetric shocks.
Amendment 208 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The EISF shall provide financial assistance in the form of loans, grants and interest rate subsidies for public investment to a Member State which is experiencing a large asymmetric shock.
Amendment 213 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Amendment 218 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) 'eligible public investment' means: (a) the public investment in support of policy objectives as defined in Regulation (EU) No [XX] of [XX] [insert reference to new Common Provisions Regulation]16 and (b)which finances a sustainable activity as provided for in Regulation No [XX] of [insert reference to the Taxonomy] and (b) and in so far not covered by point a, any expenditure in areas: (i) of education, research and training as defined in Annex A to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 and not covered in point (a);(ii) in energy efficiency, especially those aiming at fighting against energy poverty as defined in Regulation (EU) No XXX on the Governance of the Energy Union1a. _________________ 16 [Insert correct reference to new version of Common Provisions Regulation] 1ahttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52 016PC0759R(01)&from=EN
Amendment 227 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) 'EISF support' means Union financial assistance within the meaning of Article [220] of the Financial Regulation in the form of loans, grants and interest rate subsidies under the EISF in support of eligible public investment;
Amendment 229 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) 'Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth' means the targets and shared objectives guiding the action of Member States and the Union set out in the Conclusions adopted by the European Council of 17 June 2010 as Annex I (New European Strategy for Jobs and Growth, EU Headline Targets), Council Recommendation (EU) 2015/118417 on broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and of the European Union of 14 July 2015 and in Council Decision (EU) 2016/183818, and any revision of such targets and shared objectives including the objectives referred to in Council Decision (EU) 2016/184118 . _________________ 17 OJ L 192, 18.7.2015, p. 27 18 OJ L 280, 18.10.2016, p. 30 18
Amendment 236 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A Member State shall be fully eligible for EISF support where itif it meets its annual intermediate targets in the context of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and is not subject to:
Amendment 263 #
2018/0212(COD)
(d) two successivone decisions of the Council in the same imbalance procedure in accordance with Article 10(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council having established non- compliance by the Member State concerned on grounds that it has not taken the recommended corrective action in the two years prior to requesting support from the EISF;
Amendment 266 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
Amendment 268 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f
Amendment 273 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. When the agreement has entered into force, aA Member State shall only be eligible for receiving an interest rate subsidy if it complies with its obligations under the agreement grant covering 100% of the total amount of the support provided by the EISF if it complies with all eligibility criteria referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 275 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. A Member State, not meeting any the criteria of paragraph 1 shall be eligible for a grant with a cumulative discount of 20% of the total amount of support provided by the EISF for each of the items referred to under points a) to d) of paragraph 1 and a discount of 20% of the total amount of support provided by the EISF if the Member State does not meet its annual intermediate targets in the context of the Union strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Amendment 277 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The amount of support not covered by a grant shall be eligible to a loan with an interest rate subsidy to be determined in accordance with the provisions of Article 9, if within one year of the decisions and recommendations referred to under points a) to d) of paragraph 1 the Member State is not anymore subject to them or if the intermediate targets referred to in paragraph 1 is met for the subsequent two years. Absent such conditions, the interest rate subsidy as referred to in Article 9 shall be equal to zero.
Amendment 279 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A Member State experiencing an unemployment rate below the average unemployment rate in Member States referred to under Article 1, paragraph 3 shall be considered to experience a large asymmetric shock if the following activation criteria (a) and (b) are simultaneously fulfilled or if (ba) is simultaneously fulfilled with either (a) or (b):
Amendment 295 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) a leading indicator designed to anticipate turning points in economic activity based on existing indicators such as the OECD leading composite indicator or other similar indicators published by an international institution or the independent body set in the Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8 November2011 on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States
Amendment 298 #
2018/0212(COD)
2a. A Member State, whose unemployment rate is above the average unemployment rate in the Member States covered under Article 1, paragraph 3 shall be considered to experience a large asymmetric shock if any of the following activation criteria is fulfilled: (a) the quarterly national unemployment rate exceeded the average unemployment rate in the Member State concerned over a period of 60 quarters preceding the quarter during which the request is made; (b) the quarterly national unemployment rate increased above one percentage point in comparison to the unemployment rate observed in same quarter of the previous year.
Amendment 300 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 21, to specify the indicator referred to under point (ba), paragraph 1.
Amendment 314 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) maintain the same level of its public investment as a percentage of gross domestic product compared to the averagehighest level of its public investment bserved during the five previous years.
Amendment 316 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 322 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The year following the disbursement of the EISF loansupport, the Commission shall examine whether the Member State concerned has respected the criteria referred to in paragraph 1. In particular, the Commission shall also verify the extent to which the Member State concerned has maintained eligible public investment in programmes supported by the Union under the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion fund, the European Social Fund, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development.
Amendment 328 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) suspending the eligibility of the Member State to additional grants for a period of two years.
Amendment 338 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall assess and answer the requests in the order it receives them. It shall act without undue delay. At the request of the parliament of the Member State concerned or of the European Parliament, the Commission shall present its assessment to the parliament making the request.
Amendment 345 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall decide the terms of the EISF support in accordance with the provisions of Article 3(2a), 3(2b) and 8. The decision shall contain the amount, and as appropriate, the average maturity, the pricing formula, and the availability period of EISF loan and the amount of the interest rate subsidy, and the other detailed rules needed for the implementation of the support. When deciding on the terms of the EISF support, the Commission shall take into account the amount deemed to be sustainable within the meaning of Article [210(3)] of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No XX (the ‘Financial Regulation’) under the own resources ceiling for payment appropriations.
Amendment 349 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The outstanding amount of grants and loans granted to Member States under this Regulation shall be limitedamount to the higher of: (a) 1% of the cumulative GNI of participating Member States, or (b) to EUR 3120.000 bmillion in principalcurrent prices.
Amendment 358 #
Amendment 387 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) ‘α’ is 11.550%;
Amendment 394 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. An EISF loansupport shall not exceed 30 percent of the available amount referred to in Article 7 after deduction of the total amount of outstanding loans awarded under EISF.
Amendment 401 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 21, to amend this Regulation by determining the percentage referred to in paragraph 1 if this appears necessary in view of the implementation of the agreement or the eventual deferral of payments under Article 18(2).
Amendment 406 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In case the ESM or its legal successor provides financial assistance to Member States in support of eligible public investment to Member States under modalities and conditions consistent with this Regulation, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 21 in order to:
Amendment 411 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) amend or supplement Articles 9 and 18 to allow for providing grantings or an interest rate subsidy by the Stabilisation Support Fund to Member States for interest costs incurred on financial assistance granted by the ESM or its legal successor to Member States in support of eligible public investment.
Amendment 412 #
Amendment 413 #
Amendment 414 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. The EISF grant or loan shall, in principle, be disbursed in one instalment.
Amendment 416 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. The borrowing and lending operations of the EISF shall be carried out in euro.
Amendment 420 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Without prejudice to Articles 4 and 9, the costs incurred by the Union in concluding and carrying out each operation shall be borne by the Member State receiving the EISF loan or by the Stabilisation support fund in case of grants.
Amendment 429 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) contributions from Member States in accordanceannual appropriations authorised by the European Parliament and by the Council within the agreement;limits of the multiannual financial framework.
Amendment 432 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) contributions from Member States recording a current account in excess of the maximum threshold as set out in the scoreboard established to in Regulation (EU) 1176/2011 for a third year in a row. The amount of the contribution shall be equivalent to the difference between the current account experienced by the Member States in the third year and the maximum threshold for that year.
Amendment 433 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. For the purpose of paragraph 2a, the financial envelope for the implementation of the Stabilisation Support Fund is set at EUR 120000 million in current prices.
Amendment 434 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. Revenues of the Stabilisation Support Fund as provided for in point (ad) of paragraph 2 shall constitute external assigned revenue, and revenues as provided for in points (a) to (c) of paragraph 2 shall constitute internal assigned revenue in accordance with Article [21(4)] of the Financial Regulation.
Amendment 435 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4
Article 17 – paragraph 4
Amendment 438 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. The resources of the Stabilisation Support Fund may only be used for the purpose of payment of interest rate subsidies to Member Statescovering the reimbursement needs of the borrowing operations of the EISF referred to in Article 912.
Amendment 442 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Payment of grants together with an interest rate subsidy shall not exceed 30 percent of the available means in the Stabilisation Support Fund at the moment when such payment to the Member State concerned is due. Any further payment shall be deferred. Any new contributions to the Stabilisation Support Fund referred to in Article 17(2) shall be firstly used for honouring deferred payments to the Member States concerned. In case of more than one deferred payment, the order in which such payments shall be honoured shall be determined by the length of time of the deferral starting with the longest time.
Amendment 446 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. By [DATE two years after the entry into force of this Regulation] at the latest, and every fivetwo years after, the Commission shall examine the quality of the public investment management systems and practices in Member States. The Commission shall prepare a report containing a qualitative assessment and a score based on a set of indicators and, if necessary, recommendations to improve the quality of the public investment management systems and practices. The report shall be made public.
Amendment 451 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
An interim evaluation of the EISF shall be performed once there is sufficient information available about the implementation of the EISF and at the latest within two years of the EISF entry into force. A final evaluation of the EISF shall be carried out by the Commission four years after the entry into force of this Regulation,
Amendment 459 #
2018/0212(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point d
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) the appropriateness ofmodalities for developing a voluntaryfully-fledged insurance mechanism serving the purpose of macroeconomic stabilisation.
Amendment 16 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1 a) According to Articles 8 and 10 of the Treaty of Functioning of the EU, the Justice Programme in all its activities should support gender mainstreaming, including gender budgeting, and the mainstreaming of non-discrimination objectives.
Amendment 18 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) These rights and values must continue to be promoted and enforced, shared among the citizens and peoples within the Union and be at the heart of Europe’s societies, Therefore, a new Justice, Rights and Values Fund, comprising the Rights and Values and the Justice programmes shall be created in the Union budget. At a time where European societies are confronted with extremism, radicalism and divisions, it is more important than ever to promote, strengthen and defend justice, equality, rights and EU values: human rights, respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, gender equality, non-discrimination, the rule of law. This will have profound and direct implications for political, social, cultural and economic life in the EU. As a part of the new Fund, the Rights and Values Programme will bring together the 2014- 2020 Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1381/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council10 and the Europe for Citizens programme established by Regulation (EU) No 390/2014 of the Council11 . The Justice programme (hereafter the 'Programme') will continue to support the development of an integrated European justice area and cross-border cooperation, in continuity with the 2014- 2020 Justice Programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1381/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council12 (hereafter 'the predecessor Programme'). __________________ 10 Regulation (EU) No 1381/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme for the period 2014 to 2020 (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 62) 11 Council Regulation (EU) No 390/2014 of 14 April 2014 establishing the ‘Europe for Citizens’ programme for the period 2014-2020 (OJ L 115, 17.4.2014, p.3) 12 Regulation (EU) No 1381/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme for the period 2014 to 2020 (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 62).
Amendment 19 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) The Justice, Rights and Values Fund and its two underlying funding programmes will focus primarily on people and entities which contribute to make our common values, rights and rich diversity alive and vibrant. The ultimate objective is to nurture and sustain our rights-based, equal, inclusive and democratic society. That includes a vibrant civil society, encouraging people’s democratic, civic and social participation and to fostering the rich diversity of European society, also based on our common history and memory. A strong and independent women’s rights and lgtbi movement is essential for improving gender equality. It is key for the EU, in line with its core values, to provide sufficient support to these organisations, grassroots groups and defenders, particularly those working in challenging contexts. Article 11 of the EU Treaty further specifies that the institutions shall, by appropriate means, give citizens and representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action.
Amendment 21 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides for the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice, with respect for fundamental rights and the different legal systems and traditions of the Member States. To that end, the Union may adopt measures to develop judicial cooperation in civil matters and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and to promote and support the action of Member States in the field of crime prevention. Respect for fundamental rights as well as for common principles and values, such as non-discrimination, gender equality, equal treatment on the basis of sex, race or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age and sexual orientation effective access to justice for all, the rule of law and a well-functioning independent judicial system shall be ensured in the further development of a European area of justice.
Amendment 26 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6 a) The incorporation of the gender perspective in justice systems should be considered an important goal to further develop the European area of justice. Intersectional discrimination in the justice system is still one of the main barriers in terms of women’s equal access to justice. The programme should therefore actively contribute to the elimination of any discrimination and barriers to minority, disabled, migrants, asylum seekers, elderly, people living in remote areas or any vulnerable groups that might find restrictions to access to justice and support victim-friendly and gender sensitive procedures and decisions in judicial systems;
Amendment 27 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Pursuant to Articles 81(2)(h) and 82(1)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, the Union shall support the training of the judiciary and judicial staff as a tool to improve judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and of judicial decisions. Training of justice professionals is an important tool to develop a common understanding of how best to uphold the rule of law. It contributes to the building of the European area of justice by creating a common judicial culture among justice professionals of the Member States. It is essential to ensure the correct and coherent application of law in the Union and mutual trust between justice professionals in cross- border proceedings. The training activities supported by the Programme should be based on sound training needs’ assessments, use state of the art training methodology, include cross-border events gathering justice professionals of different Member States, comprise active learning and networking elements and be sustainable. Specific gender training for judges, police and prosecutors should be made available in order to ensure sure victims of trafficking, of gender-based violence and of other crimes are properly protected, identified and respected and to promote cooperation and good practices among judicial system with victim- friendly and gender sensitive procedures;
Amendment 33 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10 a) The programme should also support the promotion of best practices between courts specifically handling gender-based violence and the exchange of common resources and training materials on gender-based violence for judges, public prosecutors, lawyers, police and other professionals that come in contact with victims of gender based violence;
Amendment 40 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16 a) The programme should also aim at promoting better implementation and coordination between the various EU victim-protection instruments, such as the Regulation 606/2013 on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters; Directive 2012/29/EU of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime; and Directive 2011/99 of the European Protection Order. Special attention shall be also put in promoting the well- functioning of the European Protection Order and to coordinate programmes to initiate awareness-raising campaigns within the Member States to inform victims of crime of the possibility to apply for cross-border protection measures and to ensure that victims are aware and have full access to their rights across the EU;
Amendment 45 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) to support and promote judicial training, including gender trainings, with a view to fostering a common legal, judicial and rule of law culture;
Amendment 48 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) to facilitate effective and equal access to justice for all and effective redress, including by electronic means, by promoting efficient civil and criminal procedures and by promoting and supporting the rights of victims of crime as well as the procedural rights of suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings.
Amendment 49 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) To promote the integration of the gender perspective in European justice systems and support victim-friendly and gender sensitive procedures in judicial systems;
Amendment 50 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The budget allocated for actions linked to the promotion of gender equality shall be indicated annually in an independent budget stand;
Amendment 53 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. The performance reporting system shall ensure that data, where applicable disaggregated by gender, for monitoring programme implementation and results are collected efficiently, effectively, and in a timely manner. To that end, proportionate reporting requirements shall be imposed on recipients of Union funds and Member States.
Amendment 55 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Evaluations shall be carried out in a timely manner to feed into the decision- making process. All evaluations shall be gender sensitive and include a specific chapter on gender equality with a detailed analysis of the programme budget dedicated to gender equality related activities.
Amendment 57 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 4
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. 1. The group of experts consulted shall be gender balanced.
Amendment 58 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
2 a. Exchange of good practices on best ways to promote and incorporate the gender perspective in all the phases of the judicial system and best ways to ensure equal access to justice for all
Amendment 61 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
4 a. Specific gender training for judges, layers, police and prosecutors on gender based violence and victims- friendly procedures and exchange of best practices between courts specifically handling gender-based violence
Amendment 63 #
2018/0208(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Annex II – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The Programme will be monitored on the basis of a set of indicators intended to measure the extent to which the general and specific objectives of the Programme have been achieved and with a view to minimising administrative burdens and costs. To that end, data (disaggregated by gender where applicable) will be collected as regards the following set of key indicators:
Amendment 9 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the Rights, Equality and Values programme
Amendment 12 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1
Title 1
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the Rights and Values, Values and Citizenship programme
Amendment 15 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) The Rights and Values Programme should ensure and promote the collective rights of EU citizens including the right to self-determination of peoples as stated in Article 1 of the Charter of the United Nations and in Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Amendment 16 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Citizens should also be more aware of their rights deriving from citizenship of the Union, and should feel at ease about living, travelling, studying, working and volunteering in another Member State, and should feel able to enjoy and exercise all their citizenship rights, place their trust in equal access, full enforceability and protection of their rights without any discrimination, no matter where in the Union they happen to be. Civil society, together with local and regional authorities as well as their representative associations at the national and European level, needs to be supported for the promotion, safeguarding and raising awareness of EU common values under Article 2 TEU and in contributing to the effective enjoyment of rights under Union law. The Programme shall ensure continued support for the implementation and further development of existing local and regional initiatives that contribute to the achievement of these objectives, such as the European Charter for Equality of Women and Men in Local Life.
Amendment 18 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Pursuant to Articles 8 and 10 TFEU, the Programme in all its activities should support gender mainstreaming and the mainstreaming of non-discrimination objectives, including through the use of gender budgeting and gender impact assessment throughout and at all levels of the EU budgetary process.
Amendment 20 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Programme is to protect and promote rights and values as enshrined in the EU Treaties, including by supporting civil society organisations and local and regional authorities and their representative associations, in order to sustain open, democratic and inclusive societies.
Amendment 21 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) to promote gender equality and to advance gender mainstreaming
Amendment 22 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) to promote citizensa Europe for citizens through enhancing their engagement and participation in the democratic life of the Union (Citizens’ engagement and participation strand),
Amendment 23 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall have a regular dialogue with the beneficiaries of the Programme, in particular civil society as well as local and regional authorities and their representative associations in the definition of multi-annual and annual priorities along the programming period. A Civil Dialogue will be established as the main platform for this purpose, which shall be structured along the different specific objectives of the Programme.
Amendment 24 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) preventing and combating inequalities and discrimination on grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, and supporting comprehensive policies to promote gender equality and anti-discrimination and their mainstreaming as well policies to combat racism and all forms of intolerancor age;
Amendment 25 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a Gender equality and gender mainstreaming strand Within the specific objective set out in point (a)(a) of Article 2(2), the Programme shall focus on: (a) preventing and combating inequalities and discrimination on grounds of sex or sexual orientation and supporting comprehensive policies to promote gender equality and anti- discrimination; (b) supporting comprehensive policies to promote gender mainstreaming.
Amendment 26 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) promoting exchange and cooperation between citizens of different countries; to promotea Europe for citizens through enhancing citizens’ civic and democratic participation allowing citizens and representative assothem ciatiozens to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action; as well as the ones of representative associations of civil society and local governments; at sub-national, national and European levels,
Amendment 27 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) preventing and combating all forms of harassment and violence against children, young people and women, as well as violence against other groups at risk;, that occur online and/or in the physical realm, including places of work and public spaces.
Amendment 28 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) EUR [408.705.000]25 % of the overall financial envelope indicated in paragraph 1 for the specific objectives referred to in article 2(2)(a) and 2(2)(c);
Amendment 28 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) A strong and independent women’s rights movement is the most critical factor for improving women’s rights and gender equality. Women’s rights organisations are increasingly under attack in the EU. Therefore, it is key for the EU, in line with its core values, to provide sufficient support to women’s rights organisations, grassroots groups and defenders, particularly those working in challenging contexts.
Amendment 29 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) 15 % of the overall financial envelope indicated in paragraph 1 for the specific objectives referred to in article 2(2)(a)(a)
Amendment 30 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) EUR [233.000.000]35 % of the overall financial envelope indicated in paragraph 1 for the specific objective referred to in Article 2(2)(b);
Amendment 31 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) 25 % of the overall financial envelope indicated in paragraph 1 for the specific objectives referred to in 2(2)(c)
Amendment 32 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The work programme shall be adopted by the Commission by means of an implementing act. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in delegated act. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 196.
Amendment 33 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Indicators to report on progress of the Programme towards the achievement of the specific objectives set out in Article 2 shall be collected, where applicable, disaggregated by gender. The list of indicators are set out in Annex II.
Amendment 34 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Evaluations shall be gender mainstreamed, include a specific chapter for each strand and carried out in a timely manner to feed into the decision- making process.
Amendment 35 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 13 and 14 shall be conferred on the Commission until 31 December 2027.
Amendment 36 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
Annex I
The specific objectives of the Programme referred to in Article 2(2) will be pursued in particular through support to the following activities, at subnational, national and European levels:
Amendment 37 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - point (c) footnote 1
Annex I - point (c) footnote 1
These activities include for instance the collection of data and statistics, disaggregated by sex and age; the development of common methodologies and, where appropriate, indicators or benchmarks; studies, researches, analyses and surveys; evaluations; impact assessment; the elaboration and publication of guides, reports and educational material.
Amendment 37 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Gender-based violence and violence against children and young people constitute a serious violation of fundamental rights and disproportionately affects women and girls. Violence persists throughout the Union, in all social and economic contexts, and has serious repercussions on victims’ physical and psychological health and on society as a whole. Children, young people and women are particularly vulnerable toat risk to suffer violence, in particular in close relationships. Action should be taken to promote the rights of the child and to contribute to the protection of children from harm and violence, which pose a danger to their physical and mental health and constitute a breach of their rights to development, protection and dignity. Combating all forms of violence, promoting prevention and protecting and supporting victims are priorities of the Union which help fulfil individuals’ fundamental rights and contribute to equality between women and men. Those priorities should be supported by the Programme.
Amendment 38 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - point (g)
Annex I - point (g)
(g) bringing together Europeans of different nationalities and cultures by giving them the opportunity to participate in town-twinning activities, including small bilateral twinning projects and network of towns;
Amendment 39 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - point (h)
Annex I - point (h)
(h) encouraging and facilitating active participation in the construction of a more democratic Union as well as awareness of rights and values through support to civil society organisations and local and regional authorities as well as their representative associations;
Amendment 40 #
2018/0207(COD)
(j) developing the capacity of European networks through multiannual operating grants to promote and further develop Union law, enhance bottom-up critical debates on policy goals and strategies as well asnd supporting civil society organisas well as local and regional authorities and their representative associations active in the areas covered by the Programme.
Amendment 40 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Strong political will and coordinated action based on the methods and results of the previous Daphne Programmes, the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme and the Justice Programme are necessary in order to prevent and combat all forms of violence and to protect victims. In particular, since its launch in 1997, the Daphne funding to support victims of violence and combat the violence against women, children and young people has been a genuine success, both in terms of its popularity with stakeholders (public authorities, academic institutions and non-governmental organisations) and in terms of the effectiveness of the funded projects. It has funded projects to raise awareness, to provide support services to victims, to support the activities of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working on the ground. It has addressed all forms of violence, such as for instance domestic violence, sexual violence, trafficking in human beings, as well as new emerging forms of violence such as cyber-bullying. It is therefore important to continue all these actions, foresee an independent budget allocation for Daphne and that those results and lessons learned are taken into due consideration in the implementation of the Programme.
Amendment 41 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - point (l) new
Annex I - point (l) new
(l) Strengthening National Contact Points (NCPs) and create better synergies between the policy developments in the field of citizenship, the objectives of the Programme and the work of NCPs and beneficiaries.
Amendment 42 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - point (m) new
Annex I - point (m) new
(m) Strengthen the online platform showcasing projects developed by beneficiaries, as well as provide guidance for potential beneficiaries, disseminate project results and enhance visibility and follow-up.
Amendment 43 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - point (n) new
Annex I - point (n) new
(n) Further support critical but constructive exchanges addressing challenges which mark the daily life of Europeans such as: employment, integration of migrants, housing, mobility or education.
Amendment 48 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
(15) Pursuant to Articles 8 and 10 TFEU, the Programme in all its activities should support gender mainstreaming, including gender budgeting, and the mainstreaming of non-discrimination objectives.
Amendment 49 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1 – table
Annex II – paragraph 1 – table
Number of people, disaggregated by sex and age, reached by: (i) training activities; (ii) mutual learning and exchange of good practices activities; (iii) awareness raising, information and dissemination activities.
Amendment 49 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) The implementation of gender budgeting requires the allocation of adequate resources and transparency in the budget lines dedicated to promote gender equality and combat gender discrimination.
Amendment 54 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation establishes the Rights, Equality and Values programme (‘Programme’).
Amendment 57 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Programme is to protect and promote rights and values as enshrined in the EU Treaties, including by supporting civil society organisations, in order to sustain open, democratic, equal and inclusive societies.
Amendment 61 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) to promote gender equality and to advance gender mainstreaming (Gender equality and gender mainstreaming strand);
Amendment 64 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) to fight violencegender-based violence and violence against groups at risk (Daphne strand).
Amendment 68 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) preventing and combating inequalities and discrimination on grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, and supporting comprehensive policies to promote gender equality and anti- discrimination and their mainstreaming as well policies to combat racism and all forms of intolerance or a combination thereof;
Amendment 76 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a Gender equality and gender mainstreaming strand Within the specific objective set out in point (a a) of Article2(2), the Programme shall focus on: (a) supporting comprehensive policies to promote women’s rights and gender equality; (b) supporting comprehensive policies to promote gender mainstreaming.
Amendment 80 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) increasing women’s participation and engagement in the democratic life of the Union;
Amendment 84 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) preventing and combating all forms of violence against children, young people and women, as well as violence against other groups at riskgender-based violence;
Amendment 89 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) preventing all forms of violence against children and young people, as well as violence against other groups at risk;
Amendment 91 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) EUR [408.705200.000.000] for the specific objectives referred to in article 2(2)(a) and 2(2)(c);
Amendment 92 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) EUR [105.000.000] for the specific objectives referred to in Article 2(2)(aa);
Amendment 93 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) EUR [175.000.000] for the specific objectives referred to in Article 2(2)(c)
Amendment 97 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The evaluation committee may be composed of external experts. The composition of the evaluation committee shall be gender balanced.
Amendment 100 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. The work programme shall be adopted by the Commission after carrying out a gender impact assessment and by means of an implementing act. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 19.
Amendment 101 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Indicators to report on progress of the Programme towards the achievement of the specific objectives set out in Article 2 shall be collected, where applicable, disaggregated by gender. The list of indicators are set out in Annex II.
Amendment 106 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Evaluations shall be gender sensitive, include a specific chapter for each strand and carried out in a timely manner to feed into the decision- making process.
Amendment 111 #
2018/0207(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. The composition of the group of experts consulted shall be gender balanced.
Amendment 343 #
2018/0193(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 4
Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. When compared with the quantities landed or the result of an inspection, the permitted margin of tolerance in estimates recorded in the fishing logbook of the quantities in kilograms of fish retained on board shall be 10 % per species. For species retained on board or for the case of mixed catches of small pelagic species in the Mediterranean that do not exceed 50kg live weight equivalent, the permitted margin of tolerance shall be 20% per species.
Amendment 369 #
2018/0193(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Masters of Union catching vessels of less than 12 metres’ length overall shall submit by electronic means the information referred to in Article 14, to the competent authority of their flag Member State after the last fishing operation has been completed and before entering portthe landing of the catches.
Amendment 385 #
2018/0193(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to specific provisions contained in multiannual plans, masters of Union fishing vessels of 12 metres’ length overall or more and performing fishing trips longer than 12 hours shall notify by electronic means the competent authorities of their flag Member State at least four hours before the estimated time of arrival at port of the following information:
Amendment 457 #
2018/0193(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Article 25 a – paragraph 1
Article 25 a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure effective control of the landing obligation. For this purpose a minimum percentage of fishing vessels fishing for species subject to the landing obligation and flying their flag established in accordance with paragraph 2, shall be equippincluded with continuously recording Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) systems incorporating data storagin a specific observers programme..
Amendment 471 #
2018/0193(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 23
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Article 25 a – paragraph 3
Article 25 a – paragraph 3
3. In addition to the CCTV systems referred to in paragraph 1, Member States may require the use of other electronic monitoring systems for the purpose of controlling the landing obligation.
Amendment 502 #
2018/0193(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 35
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Article 39a – paragraph 1
Article 39a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that vessels using the following active fishing gears: trawls, seines and surrounding nets, are equipped with permanently installed devices that measure and record engine power within 5 years of the adoption of this Regulation in cases where:
Amendment 631 #
2018/0193(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 49
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Article 60 – paragraph 5 – point c a(new)
Article 60 – paragraph 5 – point c a(new)
(ca) In case of fisheries products destined for human consumption, Member States may authorise weighing of unsorted fisheries products to be market according to the exception of article 56 a bis.3.
Amendment 667 #
2018/0193(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 56
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 56
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009
Article 68 – paragraph 1
Article 68 – paragraph 1
1. Fisheries products when landed and transported before placing on the market or before the first sale in a third country shall be accompanied by a transport document covering the fisheries products and quantities transported.
Amendment 152 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) The Programme should be more inclusive by improving its outreach to those with fewer opportunities, including through more flexible learning mobility formats, and by fostering participation ofmobility formats, simplified administrative procedures, targeting of beneficiary organisations working with groups under-represented in Erasmus+, youth-friendly and clear information and communication about the programme and by fostering and supporting the participation of local organisations and small organisations, in particular newcomers, youth organisations, volunteer-based and community-based grassroots organisations that work directly with disadvantaged learners of all ages. Virtual formats, such as virtual cooperation, blended and virtual mobility, should be promoted to reach more participants, in particular those with fewer opportunities and those for whom moving physically to a country other than their country of residence would be an obstacllearners with fewer opportunities of all ages, and organisations working with and supporting people from marginalised groups, such as people with an ethnic minority background, people with disabilities and LGBTI people. Virtual formats, such as virtual cooperation, blended and virtual mobility, should be promoted to reach more participants and complement the mobility experience.
Amendment 223 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) The Programme should also enhance the learning of languages, including minority and unofficial languages, as well as national sign languages, in particular through widened use of accessible online tools, as e-learning offers additional advantages for language learning in terms of access and flexibility. The online tools and portals must be fully accessible in line with Directive (EU) 2016/2102 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies.
Amendment 429 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) language learning opportunities, including those supporting mobility activities., and including minority and unofficial languages, as well as national sign languages;
Amendment 629 #
2018/0191(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. All Programme documents shall be available in all the official and co- official languages of the European Union in order to ensure equal opportunities.
Amendment 3 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to UN General Assembly Resolution 70/1, entitled ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’,
Amendment 4 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Citation 6 b (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2017 on a European Pillar of Social Rights1, 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2017)0010.
Amendment 5 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Citation 6 c (new)
- having regard to the ratification of the Paris Agreement by the European Parliament on 4 October 20161 and by the Council on 5 October 20162, 1 Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0363. 2 OJ L 282, 19.10.2016, p. 1.
Amendment 7 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Recital C
C. whereas the MFF quickly proved its inadequacy in responding to a series of crises, new international commitments and new political challenges that were not integrated and/or anticipated at the time of adoption; whereas, for the purpose of securing the necessary funding, the MFF was pushed to its limits including an unprecedented recourse to the flexibility provisions and special instruments, after exhausting the available margins; whereas high-priority EU programmes on research and infrastructures were even cut just two years after their adoption;
Amendment 8 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls its position that the goals and objectives of the European Neighbourhood Instrument, the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights should be preserved independentlyas separate and independent instruments due to their specific nature;
Amendment 13 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reminds that the IcSP is the only EU instrument for civilian conflict prevention including mediation, dialogue and reconciliation; regrets that important aspects of the IcSP such as support to reconciliation commissions, actions on child soldiers, combatting the illicit use of fire arms or rehabilitation of victims of armed violence, are not included in the current Commission proposal establishing the NDICI; therefore, calls for the IcSP to remain a separate and independent instrument in order to preserve the Union's credibility, in particular regarding its level of ambition regarding peace and security;
Amendment 17 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates that reform of the current architecture of external financing instruments should enhance accountability, transparency, efficiency and coherence; stresses that these objectives cannot be achieved without a solid governance structure that allows for political control, is strategy-driven, inclusive and accountable, and includes clear objectives, benchmarks and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms; regrets that the Commission’s proposal for the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) contains virtually no such provisions on governance aspects; regrets that no specific mechanism is foreseen for the involvement of the European Parliament in strategic choices on priorities and funding,
Amendment 22 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the 2021-2027 MFF must guarantee the Union’s ability and responsibility to meet emerging needs, new international commitments and additional challenges and attain its political priorities and objectives; points to the serious problems linked to the underfinancing of the 2014-2020 MFF and declares the necessity to avoid a repetition of previous mistakes by securing from the outset a strong, ambitious and credible EU budget for the benefit of the citizens over the next seven-year period;
Amendment 26 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Strongly criticizes that the performance-based allocations of article 17 include “cooperation on migration” among the criteria to determine supplementary financial allocations; stresses that the original purpose of the “more for more” principle was to build stronger partnerships with those neighbours that make more progress towards democratic reform and that “cooperation of migration” deeply jeopardizes this approach and the respect of the EU to the principles included in Article 21 of the TEU;
Amendment 30 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that expenditure from the defence cluster should only be spent on defence purposes such as the defence- related part of actions under the Connecting Europe Facility, the European Defence Fund and the Horizon Europe programmeRecalls that according to Article 41(2) TEU expenditure arising from operations having military or defence implications cannot be charged to the Union budget under the next MFF.
Amendment 33 #
2018/0166R(APP)
5a. Calls on the European Commission to implement gender budgeting in accordance to Article 8 TFEU;
Amendment 34 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 4
4. Declares, moreover, its opposition to any reduction in the level of key EU policies, such as the EU cohesion policy and the common agriculturalReiterates its call for continuous support for existing policies, in particular the long-standing EU policies enshrined in the Treaties, namely the common agricultural and fisheries policies, and cohesion policy (CAP); is particularly opposed to any radical cuts that will adversely impact on the very nature and objectives of these policies, such as the cuts proposed for the Cohesion Fund or for the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development; opposes, in this context, the proposal to reduce the European Social Fund despite its enlarged scope and the integration of the Youth Employment Initiative;
Amendment 42 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the next MFF should enable the Union to provide solutions and emerge strengthened from the crises of the decade: the economic and financial downturn, youth unemployment, persistent poverty and social exclusion, the phenomenon of migration and refugees, climate change and natural disasters, environmental degradation and biodiversity loss, terrorism and instability, to name but a few; underlines that these global, cross-border challenges with domestic implications reveal the interdependency of our economies and societies, and point to the need for joint actions; Underlines, furthermore, the importance of the horizontal principles that should underpin the MFF and all related EU policies; reaffirms, in this context, its position that the EU must deliver on its commitment to be a frontrunner in implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and deplores the lack of a clear and visible commitment to that end in the MFF proposals; requests, therefore, the mainstreaming of the SDGs into all EU policies and initiatives of the next MFF; further emphasises that the elimination of discrimination is vital to fulfil the EU’s commitments towards an inclusive Europe and deplores the lack of gender mainstreaming and gender equality commitments in EU policies, as presented in the MFF proposals; underlines also itsmoreover, takes note of the commission proposal to raise the level of ambition for climate mainstreaming across all EU programmes, with a target of at least 25% of EU expenditure contribution to climate objectives; however regrets the fact that the target is not binding and reiterates its clear position that, following the Paris Agreement, climate-related spending should be significantly increased in comparison with the current MFF and reach 30 % as soon as possible and at the latest by 2027;
Amendment 52 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Deeply regrets that gender mainstreaming has been completely side- lined in the Commission’s proposal and that not only has the situation not improved but the proposals are a step backwards; points at the fact that existing goals dedicated to gender equality have been merged with other policy goals, such us in the Rights and Values programme, and that gender equality requirements, such as the gender equality ex-ante conditionality in the ESI Funds, have been eliminated in the new Commission’s proposals;
Amendment 56 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Repeats its call to strengthen gender equality in the next MFF by including a gender budgeting clause in the new MFF Regulation and a commitment for its effective monitoring in the revision clause;
Amendment 69 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 8
8. Expects, therefore, that the MFF will be placed at the top of Council’s political agenda and regrets that no tangible progress is observed so far; believes that the regular meetings between the successive Council presidencies and Parliament’s negotiating team should intensify and pave the way to official and fully-fledged negotiations; expects that a good agreement is reached before the 2019 European Parliament elections, in order to avoid the serious setbacks for the launch of the new programmes due to the late adoption of the financial framework, as experienced in the past; underlines that this timetable does not prevent the newly elected European Parliament from adjusting the 2021-2027 MFF during the mandatory mid-term revision;
Amendment 75 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that all elements of the MFF/OR package, and notably the MFF figures, should remain on the negotiating table until a final agreement is reached; recalls, in this respect, Parliament’s critical stance on the procedure leading to the adoption of the current MFF Regulation and the dominant role that the European Council assumed in this process by deciding irrevocably on a number of elements, including the MFF ceilings and several sectoral policy-related provisions breaching the spirit and the letter of the treaties;
Amendment 119 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 14 – point xvi
xvi. Maintain the level of 2014-2020 funding for several EU programmes (e.g. Justice, Rights and Values), for which the Commission proposal represents a reduction in real terms;
Amendment 121 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 14 – point xvi a (new)
xvi a. Increase the funding for the Justice, Rights and Values;
Amendment 140 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Underlines the strategic importance of large-scale infrastructure projects, namely the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay (EGNOS), the Global Satellite Navigation System (Galileo), the Earth Observation Programme (Copernicus) and the future Governmental Satellite Communications (GOVSATCOM) for the EU’s future competitiveness, security and political power; points out that the financing of these large-scale projects needs to be secured in the EU budget but, at the same time, ring-fenced, so as to ensure that possible cost overruns do not threaten the funding and successful implementation of other Union policies, as exemplified in the previous MFF in certain individual cases; recalls that, for this purpose, the maximum amount for these projects is currently fixed in the MFF Regulation, and calls for similar provisions in the new regulation;
Amendment 145 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 18
18. Underlines the need to maintain an MFF mid-term revision, building on the positive precedent set in the current framework, and calls for: i. A compulsory and legally binding mid -term revision, following a review gender sensitive of the functioning of the MFF; ii. The relevant Commission proposal to be presented in time for the next Parliament and Commission to conduct a meaningful adjustment of the 2021-2027 framework, and no later than 1 January 2023; iii. The pre-allocated national envelopes not to be reduced through this revision.A fully fledged revision which does not exclude any options, including the possibly to revise the MFF ceilings iv. The revision should be adopted by Qualified Majority Vote in the Council making use of the passerelle clause as provided for in the article 312(2) of the TFEU;
Amendment 156 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Adoption of the MFF 20 a. Considers that the unanimity requirement for the adoption of the MFF Regulation represents a true impediment in the process; calls on the European Council, in this regard, to activate the passerelle clause provided for in Article 312(2) TFEU so as to allow for the adoption of the MFF Regulation by qualified majority; recalls, moreover, that the general passerelle clause set out in Article 48(7) TEU can also be deployed, in order to apply the ordinary legislative procedure; stresses that a shift towards qualified majority voting for the adoption of the MFF Regulation would be in line with the decision-making process for the adoption of virtually all EU multiannual programmes, as well as for the annual procedure for adopting the EU budget;
Amendment 159 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 21
21. AcceptsTakes note of the overall structure of seven MFF headings, as proposed by the Commission, which largely corresponds to Parliament’s own proposal; considers that this structure provides for greater transparency, improves the visibility of EU expenditure, while maintaining the necessary degree of flexibility; considers that this structure improves the visibility of EU expenditure,; agrees, moreover, with the creation of “programme clusters” that are expected to lead to a significant simplification and rationalisation of the EU budget structure and its clear alignment with the MFF headings;
Amendment 172 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 26
26. Stresses the importance of the new sanction mechanism whereby Member States that do not respect the values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) shall be subject to financial consequences to be adopted according to the ordinary legislative procedure; warns, however, that final beneficiaries of the Union budget shall in no way be affected by the disregarding from their government towards fundamental rights and the rule of law; therefore underlines that measures shall not affect the obligation of government entities or of Member States to make payments to final beneficiaries or recipients;
Amendment 183 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 30
30. Stresses that the current system of own resources is highly complex, unfair and non-transparent and totally incomprehensible to the EU’s citizens; calls again for a simplified system that will be more understandable for the EU citizens;
Amendment 193 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 32
32. Supports the suggested modernisation of existing own resources, which implies: - maintaining the customs duties as traditional own resources for the EU, whilst decreasing the percentage Member States retain as “collection cost”; and going back to the normal rate of 10%; - simplifying the Value Added Tax- based own resource, i.e. introducing a uniform call rate without exceptions; - maintaining the GNI-based own resource, with the objective of reducing, to less than 60%, its share in the financing of the EU budget, while preserving its balancing function;
Amendment 194 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32.a Reminds however its position that the introduction of new own resources should have a dual purpose, i.e. first, to bring about a substantial reduction (aiming at 40 %) in the proportion of GNI-based contributions, thus creating savings for Member State budgets; and second, to enable the financing of an higher level of EU spending under the post-2020 MFF, also covering the gap resulting from the withdrawal of the UK;
Amendment 198 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 33
33. Takes positive noteFully supports, in parallel, of the Commission proposal to gradually introduce a basket of new own resources which, without increasing the fiscal burden for citizens, would correspond to two strategic objectives of the EU, the European added value of which is evident and irreplaceable: - the proper functioning, the consolidation and the strengthening of the single market in particular by the implementation of a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) as a basis for a new own resource through the setting of a uniform levy rate on the revenue from the CCCTB; - the fight against climate change and the acceleration of energy transition, through measures such as a share of the emission trading scheme income and a contribution based on the quantity of non- recycled plastic packing; - the fight to protect the environment through a contribution based on the quantity of non-recycled plastic packing;
Amendment 202 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 34
34. RequestDemands the extension of the list of potential new own resources, that cshould include a share of a digital tax, to be presented in the years to come, as well as further consideration ofas soon as possible, as well as the Financial Transaction Tax;
Amendment 208 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 35
35. Approves strongly the suppression of all rebates and other correction mechanisms, accompanied, should the need arise, by a limited period of phasing outfurthermore reminds that in the context of Brexit the UK rebate and the related ‘rebates on the rebate’ will become obsolete;
Amendment 213 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Paragraph 36
36. Calls on the introduction of other revenue of which the allocation to the EU budget cannot be put into question: - fees linked to the implementation of mechanisms in direct relation with the EU, such as the ETIAS system; - fines paid by companies for breaching the Union’s rules, especially in the EU competition law, or fines for late payments of contributions; - Seigniorage, for the purpose of financing a new investment stabilisation mechanism;
Amendment 226 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Article 8 TFEU lays down the principle of gender mainstreaming in all EU activities which requires the allocation of adequate resources, and transparency in the budget allocations dedicated to promote gender equality and to combat gender based discrimination.
Amendment 233 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In order to fulfil the Union’s commitment to be a frontrunner in implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) including gender equality, the MFF revision shall be prepared taking into account progress made in its implementation into all EU policies and initiatives of the 2021-2027 MFF, measured on the basis of performance indicators elaborated by the Commission; the MFF revision shall also be prepared taking into account progress made in achieving the 25% of EU expenditure contribution to climate objectives target over the MFF 2021-2027 and the 30% climate-related spending target, to be achieved as soon as possible and at the latest by 2027, also measured on the basis of performance indicators.
Amendment 235 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 b (new)
Recital 10 b (new)
(10b) In order to address the European Court of Auditors recommendations, compulsory climate action targets should be laid out in programme specific legislations and require ex-ante earmarking in all programming and planning processes rather than ex-post accounting. Climate mainstreaming and climate proofing mechanisms should be unified by reforming, expanding and centralizing the Rio Marker system, in order to differentiate between mitigation and adaptation, and between sectors; and by ‘Energy Efficiency first’ assessments during infrastructure investment planning, as set out in the Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union, as well as clear exclusion criteria. Performance frameworks should be based on adequate and elaborate output and result indicators, showing the level of ambition and putting results into perspective of national needs, objectives and opportunities.
Amendment 239 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 1 - Article 3 a (new)
Chapter 1 - Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a Gender budgeting The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall incorporate a gender responsive perspective at levels of the budgetary procedure for each year concerned and restructure revenues and expenditures in order to promote gender equality and ensure gender mainstreaming.
Amendment 264 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 4 – Article 16
Chapter 4 – Article 16
Before 1 January 20243, the Commission shall present a review of the functioning of the MFF. This review shall, as appropriate, be accompanied by relevant proposalslegislative proposal for the revision of this Regulation in accordance with the procedures set out in the TFEU based on a review of the functioning of the MFF that shall be gender sensitive and include a specific chapter on gender equality. The proposal shall be prepared in order to reach the 25% of EU expenditure contribution to climate objectives target over the MFF 2021-20207 and the 30% climate-related spending target as soon as possible and at the latest by 2027 and to mainstream the UN Sustainable Development Goals, including gender equality.
Amendment 273 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 7 – Article 24 a (new)
Chapter 7 – Article 24 a (new)
Article 24a Transition towards a more democratic and transparent multiannual financial framework In line with the decision of the European Council laid down in the conclusion [XXX], the next multiannual financial frameworks and revisions, including the mid-term revision, shall be adopted by qualified majority in the Council according to the clause provided for in Article 312(2) TFEU.
Amendment 45 #
2018/0064(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) provide relevant information on the rights and obligations of individuals in cross-border labour mobility situations, including on pension rights and maternity, paternity, parental and carers’ leave;
Amendment 85 #
2017/2286(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) guarantee fund has been financed partly at the expense of Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF); reiterates Parliament’s long-standing position that any new initiatives should be financed by new appropriations; and commits to correcting the dammage done to existing programmes through the annual budgetary procedure.
Amendment 87 #
2017/2286(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 145 #
2017/2286(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Believes that both the EU and the Member States should demonstrate solidarity towards migrants arriving in Europe in facing up to this challenge; believes that EU agencies and policies involved in or relating to the management of migration flows should be adequately financed to meet this challenge and that the EU, in order to mitigate the cost in the long term and by acting in a manner befitting its values, should also demonstrate solidarity in creating conditions for peace and prosperity in the countries of origin by placing greater emphasis on development policies; recalls that the redeployment of funding from development to security and defence objectives must be avoided; recognises the importance and the distinct value of development policy, with objectives such as poverty eradication, education, health and economic development in their own right.
Amendment 150 #
2017/2286(BUD)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the fact that, following the mid-term revision of the MFF, the 2018 procedure showreconfirmed that the budgetary authority can fully exercise its prerogatives to determine the level and content of the EU budget through the annual budgetary procedure;
Amendment 60 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Is concerned that ENI funding in politically sensitive contexts remains challenging, especially with regard to promotion of the shared values of democracy and human rights; regrets that the “more for more” approach that was adopted by the Commission in the wake of the so-called Arab Spring has been progressively discarded, and that countries that are manifestly departing from their stated commitments to human rights and democratic reform have enjoyed increasing financial assistance over the recent period;
Amendment 72 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises that the IcSP’s primary added value is its speed and flexibility when it comes to addressing conflict and its broad range of civilian actors with whom the EU can partner; reminds that the IcSP is the only EU instrument for civilian conflict prevention including mediation, dialogue and reconciliation;
Amendment 74 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the need for conflict prevention and to address security challenges have increased drastically in the recent period; believes that there is a very high demand for reconciliation but also mediation and dialogue initiatives in many post-war crisis countries with sectarian cleavages; therefore stresses the need to significantly increase funds available for such initiatives;
Amendment 79 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Stresses that the new military capacity building component (CBSD) may set a precedent for the next MFF which could lead to the IcSP and Heading IV becoming open for all kinds of military funding purposes and pose risks for CSO working with the EU being perceived as parties in armed conflict;
Amendment 82 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the added value of the worldwide holistic approach of the EIDHR, despite its relatively small budget, as well as its unique feature of being the only instrument through which the EU can support civil society actions regardless of the consent of the authorities of the State concerned by such actions;
Amendment 85 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that in the current period the EIDHR has been used more flexibly and with more complementarity than in the previous period; welcomes the increased focus on human rights defenders, including through the emergency fund available at the level of EU delegations, and the establishment and the successful operation of the EU Protect Defenders mechanism;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Is concerned about the difficulties in mainstreaming human rights and democratic values through geographic programmes, leading to increased pressure on the EIDHR and the reduced support by Member States to civil society organisations, leading to increased pressure on the EIDHR at a time of closing space for civil society worldwide;
Amendment 102 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls for EU and universal values to remain at the core of all EU external actions; stresses that EU external action must prioritise tackling critical global challenges, such as the peace, security and development nexus, and recognise that the promotion of human rights and democracy, and support for human rights defenders and civil society organisations, are essential to working towards these interlinked goals;
Amendment 109 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Urges increased synergies and coherence between all instruments under Heading IV, as well as with bilateral assistance programmes of Member States; calls, in this regard, on the Commission and the EEAS to strengthen their cooperation and coordination;
Amendment 155 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27 a. Expresses alarm at the increase in destruction and confiscation of EU- funded humanitarian assistance in the West Bank; deplores the lack of resolve of the EEAS and the Commission, as highlighted by the European Court of Auditors, to secure compensation from and guarantees of non-repetition by the Israeli authorities;
Amendment 167 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls for an improved strategic framework and for synergies between IcSP and follow-up actions under other instruments and by other actors in particular the DCI, IPA II and ENI with regards to medium and long term peacebuilding;
Amendment 175 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Reiterates the importance of supporting and promoting democracy and human rights in third countries, regardless of the consent or acquiescence by third countries;
Amendment 182 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Recommends increased strategic planning in conjunction with political guidance from EU authorities and coherence with the other instruments, especially in countries experiencing a decline in human rights and democratic standards, to counter the global trends of illiberalism and the closing space for civil society; in this context, insists that the EIDHR concentrates its funding on supporting human rights defenders and civil society organisations at risk, notably through the expansion of the EU human rights defenders mechanism and the Emergency Fund;
Amendment 184 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33 a. Underlines the importance to focus on internationally relevant thematic issues that may underpin, in the short-, mid- and/or long-term, the globalisation of human rights and the rule of international law and justice; calls for greater EIDHR support in a number of emerging thematic issues, notably the fight against corruption, business and human rights, environmental rights and rights of migrants;
Amendment 189 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Insists that urgent work is required to further diminish the bureaucratic obstacles encountered by local civil society organisations (CSOs); encourages EU delegations to publish calls for proposals in local languages and to allow applicants to submit project proposals therein;
Amendment 218 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. ReiteratNotes that the EEAS wishes thato reform of the current instrument architecture, claiming that it is required in order to provide more flexibility, efficiency, coherence and responsiveness, and would also increase cost-effectiveness, accountability, transparency and public oversight;
Amendment 228 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Notes that this could bee EEAS proposes to achieved this through a simplification of the current architecture;
Amendment 234 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 a (new)
Paragraph 40 a (new)
40 a. Underlines that the staff working documents on the midterm review declare all instruments “relevant and fit for purpose” and that the EEAS services have so far been lacking any concrete examples to justify why a merger would bring improvements;
Amendment 236 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 b (new)
Paragraph 40 b (new)
40 b. Expresses its concern in particular about the three thematic instruments which differ in the decision-making modalities from the geographical instruments that are programmed in cooperation with the recipient countries: the EIDHR operates independently from the consent of partner country authorities, the IcSP covers in its article 3 non- programmable crisis response measures and the PI is supposed to finance the ‘external dimension of EU’s internal policies’; recalls the specific implementing rules which make for example the IcSP such a useful instrument to support civilian conflict prevention and peacebuilding activities and which need to be maintained (e.g. variety of activities, geographical coverage, range of actors, etc.);
Amendment 238 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40 c (new)
Paragraph 40 c (new)
40 c. Underlines that the EU, when creating the EIDHR and the IcSP, laid a particular focus on human rights, conflict prevention and peace-building; stresses that it is important to preserve these priorities not only in its activities but also visibly for the outside communication by maintaining separate instruments; stresses that the preservation of these thematic instruments is crucial for the Union's credibility, in particular regarding its level of ambition regarding peace and security;
Amendment 240 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
41. Stresses that a single instrument cannot exist without the inclusion of clear and dedicated envelopes for the various goals, objectives and priorities of EU external action, including democracy, human rights, the rule of law, support to civil society, conflict resolution, fragile states, development policy, economic and social development, and support to countries in various stages of EU accessionthe simplification of the current architecture should not result in the merger of all instruments; believes that only in very few cases the merging of instruments generates an added value like in the case of DCI and EDF;
Amendment 250 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41 a. Instructs the EU to keep a single, dedicated instrument for civil society and human rights and democracy, including a mechanism on support and protection for human rights defenders, with its own legal basis and separate from other instruments; underlines that this is in order to ensure that there are no risks to its independence and that its funds cannot be diverted to other objectives; calls on the Commission to ensure that human rights and democracy objectives are mainstreamed into the objectives of all other instruments;
Amendment 253 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 b (new)
Paragraph 41 b (new)
41 b. Instructs the EU to keep a single, dedicated instrument for civilian conflict prevention and rapid civilian crisis response; urges to take into account the growing demand in Europe’s neighbourhood by tripling funds available for civilian conflict prevention in particular for financing initiatives in the field of mediation, dialogue and reconciliation; underlines that such an increase should not be at the expense of civilian conflict prevention and peacebuilding in other regions;
Amendment 257 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
43. Reiterates that flexibility is reliant on the ability to transfer funds between envelopes; recalls that funds destined for external action objectives cannot be rerouted to serve other objectives, including migration management, border security, military capacity-building of partner countries and internal security; calls for a dedicated proportion of the total external action instrument budget (no less than 15 %) to be reserved for flexible and/or urgent action and thus to remain unprogrammed;
Amendment 277 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50 a (new)
Paragraph 50 a (new)
50 a. Believes that the IcSP’s follow-up regulation should not include the military capacity building for partner countries component (CBSD) as this politically weakens the EU’s only instrument for civilian conflict prevention; also recalls that CBSD funding under the current IcSP is noncompliant with Article 209 TFEU, relevant case-law of the ECJ and the limits to military spending imposed by Article 41(2) TEU;
Amendment 278 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50 b (new)
Paragraph 50 b (new)
50 b. Believes that it is of crucial importance to building a reinforced and purely civilian IcSP for the next MFF also for the purpose of redressing the imbalance between low Union commitments regarding civilian conflict prevention and on the other side defence activities such as CBSD, European Defence Fund and PESCO;
Amendment 279 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50 c (new)
Paragraph 50 c (new)
50 c. Notes plans to create a European Peace Facility; underlines that such a facility should be restricted to civilian actions in the field of conflict prevention and peacebuilding and all military activities should be grouped under the umbrella of another dedicated instrument;
Amendment 280 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50 d (new)
Paragraph 50 d (new)
50 d. Recalls that according to 41(2) TEU expenditure arising from operations having military or defence implications cannot be charged to the Union budget under the next MFF; calls therefore on the Council to adapt the ATHENA mechanism to new demands such as military capacity building of partner countries, PESCO and joint research and development in line with the Parliament’s resolution of 22 November 2016 on the European Defence Union (2016/2052(INI)) and the related recommendation contained within its paragraph 47;
Amendment 78 #
2017/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas the situation in Tibet has deteriorated over the past few years, with the Chinese Government curtailing a wide- range of human rights under the pretext of security and stability, and engaging in relentless attacks against Tibetan identity and culture; whereas the Chinese government has created in Tibet an environment in which there are no limits to state authority, a climate of fear is pervasive, and every aspect of public and private life is tightly controlled and regulated; whereas in Tibet, any acts of non-violent dissent or criticism of state policies with regard to ethnic or religious minorities can be considered as ‘splittist’ and therefore criminalized; whereas access to the Tibet Autonomous Region today is more restricted than ever for foreigners, including EU citizens, particularly for journalists, diplomats and other independent observers, and even more difficult for EU citizens of a Tibetan background;
Amendment 224 #
2017/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Urges China to review its policies in Tibet, which far from creating stability are only heightening tensions, as highlighted by the over 150 self- immolations in Tibet since 2009; calls on China to review and amend laws, regulations and measures passed in recent years that severely limit the exercise of civil and political rights of Tibetans, including their freedom of expression and their religious freedom; urges the Chinese leadership to pursue development and environmental policies that respects the economic, social and cultural rights of Tibetans and are inclusive of local populations, in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; calls for the resumption of a constructive dialogue between the Chinese Government and the representatives of the Dalai Lama; urges China to give EU diplomats, journalists and citizens unfettered access to Tibet in reciprocity to the free and open access to the entire territories of the EU Member States that Chinese travellers enjoy; urges the EU Institutions to take the issue of access to Tibet into serious consideration in the discussions on the EU- China visa facilitation agreement;
Amendment 8 #
2017/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Highlights the positive findings in the European Court of Auditors' Special Reports 30/2016 on the effectiveness of EU development support to priority sectors in Honduras and 3/2017 on EU assistance to Tunisia; underlines the Court's assessment, in line with previous special reports on EU development spending, that EU funds have been generally well spent, which is a proof for the high quality of EU development spending;
Amendment 11 #
2017/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Recalls the need to maintain a robust and independent instrument for humanitarian aid as called for by the European Consensus on humanitarian aid;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls the importance of these instruments for the provision of global public goods such as climate change adaptation and mitigation, conflict prevention, stability and the Sustainable Development Goals;
Amendment 26 #
2017/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Welcomes a closer alignment with recipient countries' priorities and urges less fragmentation of thematic programmes;
Amendment 27 #
2017/2258(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Insists on adequate staffing at Headquaters and in EU delegations, both in terms of numbers as well as development and humanitarian aid expertise.
Amendment 1 #
2017/2227(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), as adopted by the General Assembly on 13 September 2007,
Amendment 27 #
2017/2227(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Acknowledges progress made by Australia in the protection of the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; notes at the same time that there is still progress to be made in the field of minorities' rights, notably the need to involve them in policy-making and consultation processes, including the establishment of an Indigenous advisory body to parliament, as recommended by the Referendum Council;
Amendment 28 #
2017/2227(INI)
5. SupportAcknowledges the upcoming launch of negotiations for an EU-Australia free trade agreement, which must be conducted in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit while taking into account the sensitivity of certain products; points out the timely launch of these negotiations, given that Australia has already reached several FTAs with important countries in East Asia and the Pacific and is about to conclude them with other relevant countrie and the full exclusion of the most sensitive sectors;
Amendment 11 #
2017/2145(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Encourages the EEAS and the Commission services to further tighten their cooperation in order to strengthen the proper application of public procurement rules and the prevention of fraud at the delegations;
Amendment 12 #
2017/2145(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Commends the efforts by the EEAS to set clear rules in order define the limits between economic diplomacy and lobbying, both at Headquarters and in the Delegations and urges to continue the efforts;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2145(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Considering numerous poor public pronouncement practices reported in the last years in different EU delegations, which cannot be attributed solely to discrepancies between EU rules and local conditions, suggests to consider creating a centralised unit to give EEAS’ staff additional training;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2145(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Underlines the huge financial losses incurred due to the fact that until recently the EEAS/Commission could in most cases de facto not purchase the delegation premises and had to rent at high costs; welcomes the loan facility of EUR 200million to improve the management of the building policy and calls for this loan facility to be increased;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2136(DEC)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Amendment 1 #
2017/2122(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital 1 a (new)
Recital 1 a (new)
1. whereas the EU is committed to promoting gender equality and ensuring gender mainstreaming in all of its actions;
Amendment 8 #
2017/2122(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that the EU Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development is one of the fundamental tools of the EU to improve gender equality in third countries and therefore believes that GAP2 should take the form of a Commission communication; calls on the Commission to take into account EP’s resolution on the renewal of the GAP;
Amendment 43 #
2017/2122(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Strongly condemns the reinstatement and expansion of the Global Gag Rule and its impact on women’s and girls’ global health care and rights; reiterates its call on the EU and its Member States to fill the financing gap left by the US in the area of sexual and reproductive health and rights, using both national as well as EU development funding.
Amendment 46 #
2017/2122(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on the Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure the protection of women migrants, refugees and asylum seekers such as legal counselling, access to health, safe spaces for women and children and access to sexual and reproductive health and rights, including safe abortions.
Amendment 47 #
2017/2122(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Stresses the need for family reunification procedures to afford individual rights for women and girls joining their families in the EU, in order not to have to depend on a possibly abusive relationship with the male family member for access to health, education or work.
Amendment 49 #
2017/2122(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Condemns all forms of discrimination and violence against LGBTI people; calls on the EEAS to raise and promote global awareness on LGBTI rights through the EU external actions in order to end the discrimination they face on a daily basis.
Amendment 50 #
2017/2122(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 e (new)
Paragraph 8 e (new)
8e. Points out that the rates of people at risk of poverty or social exclusion are higher amongst women and asks the Commission to increase its efforts in implementing measures to combat poverty and social exclusion as part of its development policies.
Amendment 240 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses that preserving peace, stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region is of substantial interest to the EU and its member states; calls for all parties concerned in the region to solve differences through peaceful means and to refrain from taking unilateral actions to change the status quo, including in the East and South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, in order to safeguard regional security; acknowledges the continued good will and flexibility shown by the government of Taiwan in maintaining cross-Strait relations and encourages the resumption of bilateral dialogues, which will be conducive to regional peace and stability; reiterates its commitment to supporting Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations and activities;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas under Article 8 of the TFEU, the EU is committed to promotion ofng equality between men and women iand ensuring gender mainstreaming in all of its actions as a fundamental principle of the European Union; whereas an interinstitutional joint declaration on gender mainstreaming is attached to the MFF;
Amendment 3 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the briefing paper of the European Court of Auditors on the mid-term review of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 from 2016;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas for the 2014-2020 MFF, the attached joint declaration of November 2013 of Parliament, the Council and the Commission embodied the agreement that the annual budgetary procedures applying to the MFF would, as appropriate, integrate gender-responsive elements taking into account the ways in which the overall financial framework of the Union contributes to increased gender equality and ensures gender mainstreaming;
Amendment 5 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the Commission’s communication on the MFF midterm review published in September 2016 makes no reference to the implementation of gender mainstreaming;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to the ratification of the Paris Agreement by the European Parliament and the Council on 4 October 2016[1],[1] P8_TA(2016)0363
Amendment 9 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that gender budgeting is part of an overall strategy on gender equality and stresses, therefore, that the commitment of EU institutions on that area is fundamental; regrets in this context that no EU gender equality strategy 2016-2020 was adopted and, echoing the Council Conclusions on Gender Equality of the 16th of June 2016, calls on the Commission to enhance the status of its Strategic engagement for gender equality 2016-2019 by adopting it as a Communication;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Regrets that, in spite of the joint declaration having been attached to the MFF on gender mainstreaming, there has been little progress in this field and no clear gender equality strategy with specific objectives, concrete targets and allocations, has emerged from the MFF 2014-2020;
Amendment 11 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas a budget is not a compilation of figures but an instrument aiming at financing a political project and vision; whereas the budget is the financial representation of what we value most
Amendment 12 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) was agreed in 2013 and entailed, for the first time, a reduction in real terms of both commitment and payment appropriations compared to the previous financial programming period in spite of growing EU competences and ambitions as set out in the Lisbon Treaty and the Europe 2020 strategy respectively; whereas the self-defeating horse-trading approach which led to the current MFF should no longer prevail; whereas it also involved a significant gap between the level of commitment and payment appropriations, which contributed to a backlog in unpaid bills in the two first years of the MFF; whereas the late adoption of the MFF and the related legal bases contributed to implementation delays, the repercussions of which are still felt today and which might lead to an accumulation of payment claims at the end of the current MFF, spilling over into the next period; whereas, at Parliament’s insistence, new provisions were included in the MFF in order to use its global ceilings to the fullest possible extent and to provide for flexibility mechanisms;
Amendment 15 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that increased funding is needed for an effective European response to modern challenges and to tackle Europe’s new priorities, which are reflected in the EU Global Strategy and the renewed European Neighbourhood policy, including development aid, human rights violations, bad governance, security threats and armed conflicts, and natural disasters and climate change as well as the root causes of current refugee and migratory challenges caused by these issues;
Amendment 15 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the expression of a renewed commitment by Parliament, the Council and the Commission to gender equality in the next MFF, by means of a joint declaration attached to the MFF including a commitment to implement gender budgeting; calls for effective monitoring of the implementation of this declaration in the annual budgetary procedures by including a provision in a review clause of the new MFF regulation;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the MFF 2014-2020 quickly proved its inadequacy in meeting actual needs and political ambitions, as, from the outset, it was called upon to address a series of crises and new challenges in the areas of climate change, investment, migration and refugees, youth employment, security, agriculture and the environment, which had not been anticipated at the time of its adoption; whereas, as a result, the current MFF had already been pushed to its limits after only two years of implementation as available margins had been exhausted, flexibility provisions and special instruments had been mobilised to a substantial extent, existing policies and programmes had been put under pressure or even reduced, and some off-budget mechanisms had been created as a way of compensating for the insufficient level of the EU budget;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for gender equality to be explicitly mentioned in the heading 3, ‘Security and citizenship’linked to citizenship and fundamental rights;
Amendment 20 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas those shortcomings had already become evident at the time of the mid-term review and revision of the MFF launched at the end of 2016, and ought to have merited immediate actions, as demonstrated by Parliament in its resolution of 6 July 2016; whereas the agreed mid-termpost-electoral revision succeeded in broadening the potential of the existing flexibility provisions to a moderate extent, but fell short of revising the MFF ceilings;
Amendment 20 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the need to sufficiently finance, under the European structural and investment funds and EAFRD, measures promoting and supporting good-quality education, employability, entrepreneurship and job creation for women and girls, so that budgetary expenditure is effectively used to achieve policy targets;
Amendment 21 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas on 12 December 2015, in Paris, the EU and the member states signed, and since have ratified, the Paris Climate agreement which entered into force on 4 November2016; whereas The Paris Agreement's aim is to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by keeping a global temperature rise this century well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius;
Amendment 22 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Repeats its call for the Daphne programme to have a separate budget line in order to increase transparency regarding use of the funds concerned and to ensure an appropriatincrease the level of funding for fighting violence against women. to reverse the decrease of funds dedicated to Daphne during the 2014-2020 period;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Believes that there is the need to strengthen and deepen cooperation between Member States on military capabilities needed for the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP);calls on the Member States, the VP/HR, and the Commission to prioritise instruments which would significantly increase the efficiency of national defence spending and the respect for internal market rules in the defence sector; refers to the recent Commission assessment which stressed that collectively the 28 Member States could annually save between EUR 25-100 billion in case they cooperate efficiently on defence research, development, procurement and other relevant areas; therefore rejects any attempts to use scarce EU budget resources for defence research, capability development or other related military activities;
Amendment 27 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas under Article 8 of the TFEU, the EU is committed to promoting equality between men and women and ensuring gender mainstreaming in all of its actions as a fundamental principle; whereas an interinstitutional joint declaration on gender mainstreaming is attached to the MFF;
Amendment 27 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Deplores that the European Fund for Strategic Investments does not include a gender perspective and stresses that a successful process of recovery is not possible without addressing the impact of the crises on women;
Amendment 28 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Rejects any attempts to use scarce EU budget resources for defence research, capability development or other related military activities;
Amendment 29 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Highlights that gender mainstreaming is also among the founding principles of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF); deplores, however, the lack of targeted actions on gender equality with specific budget lines despite Parliament’s reiterated calls to take into account the gender dimension also within migration and asylum policies;
Amendment 30 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Strongly condemns the reinstatement and expansion of the Global Gag Rule and its impact on women’s and girls’ global health care and rights; reiterates its call on the EU and its Member States to fill the financing gap left by the US in the area of sexual and reproductive health and rights, using both national as well as EU development funding;
Amendment 32 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Adoptsffirms that a budget is not a compilation of figures but an instrument aiming at financing a political project and vision; insists on the fact that a budget is the financial representation of what we value most; adopts therefore the present resolution in order to outline Parliament’s position on the post-2020 MFF, with particular attention to its expected priorities, size, structure, duration, flexibility and other horizontal principles, and to point out the specific budgetary orientations for the respective EU policies covered by the next financial framework; expects the Commission to present the legislative proposal for the next MFF together with a new draft interinstitutional agreement that takes into account Parliament’s positions and suggestions; stresses that this resolution also provides a basis for Parliament’s engagement in the procedure leading to the adoption of the next MFF;
Amendment 33 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Adopts, in parallel, a separate resolution to set out its position on the reform of the EU’s own resources system in line with the recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources; calls on the Commission to take due account of Parliament’s position in preparing the legislative proposals on the EU’s own resources, which should be ambitious in scope and presented together with the MFF proposals; stresses that both the expenditure and the revenue side of the next MFF will be treated as a single package in the upcoming negotiations, and that no agreement will be reached on the MFF without corresponding headway being made onstates that it is not prepared to give its consent to the next MFF regulation before the European elections without a reform of the own -resources system;
Amendment 35 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Insists on the fact the in 2015, in Paris, the world took one the most important commitments of its recent History: fighting against the Climate Change and the EU -and its member states- was part of the signatories; considers that now the time has to come to respect and implement the Paris Climate Agreement and to deliver on policies; is the firm opinion that if the EU wants to be coherent with its commitments, it has to be consistent in its policies within and outside the EU in order to protect our Planet.
Amendment 36 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Reminds that a decade after the worst financial, economic and social crisis since the World War II, the EU has still not fully recovered from an economic and social point of view; stresses that millions of Europeans are victims of discriminations, millions of Europeans are desperately looking for a decent life, millions of Europeans are still unemployed and do not see any job opportunity in a near future and millions of Europeans are living in poverty or are at risk of falling into; highlights that in the meanwhile a very tiny group of people have been getting richer and richer; considers that this should be ended; is convinced that if the EU wants to reconnect with the people, we have to tackle growing inequalities and to take care of the people.
Amendment 37 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Stresses that in order to tackle climate change and growing inequalities, the EU has to invest in the future; insists on the need to invest in the future generations, to adapt our infrastructures and to support our research programmes; is convinced that tomorrow has already started; however reminds that changes require time but believes that we can protect our Planet, take care of the people and invest in our future simultaneously; therefore is convinced that EU budget as a key role to play because it has a strong catalytic effects on public and private funding at all level of governances; thus, highlights that, to be coherent, the EU must align its future budget, the so-called Post-2020 MFF and its legal framework.
Amendment 40 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the discussion about the next MFF as an opportunity to prepare the ground for a stronger Europe through one of its most tangible instruments, the Union budget; believes that the next MFF should be embedded in a broader strategy and narrative for the future of Europe and structured in a way that ensures compliance with its international obligations, including the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD); considers therefore that, at least 50% of the post2020 MFF should be Climate-related; calls on the commission to present a clear methodology to calculate the climate-related spending in order to ensure a proper monitoring over the next MFF; proposes furthermore to introduce a gender mainstreaming in the next MFF in order to really combats gender discriminations and inequalities in order to ensure the protection of women's rights as laid down in the treaties; calls on the commission to present a clear methodology in order to properly and effectively ensure its monitoring;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Maintains that EU external financing instruments are essential for effective EU external action in particular in the European Neighbourhood (European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI)) and pre- accession countries (Instrument for Pre- accession Assistance II); points out that the ENI should take account of the increased emphasis on stabilisation, peace processes, post-crisis reconstruction and resilience; underlines the urgent need to strengthen the EU’s civilian conflict prevention capacities; underlines the need to increase funds for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP) and its preventive activities such as mediation, dialogue and reconciliation;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Regrets that, inspire of the joint declaration having been attached to the MFF on gender mainstreaming, there has been little progress in this field and no clear gender equality strategy with specific objectives, concrete targets and allocations, has emerged from the MFF 2014-2020; calls for the expression of a renewed commitment by Parliament, the Council and the Commission to gender equality in the next MFF, by means of a joint declaration attached to the MFF including a commitment to implement gender budgeting; calls for effective monitoring of the implementation of this declaration in the annual budgetary procedures by including a provision in are view clause of the new MFF regulation; believes that it is fundamental to implement gender budgeting as part of an overall gender mainstreaming strategy which is key to ensure the protection of women's rights and it is also an obligation laid down in the treaties; therefore, in order to see a stronger and more efficient integration of gender mainstreaming in the next period, proposes to renew the commitment in form of a joint declaration with an specific mention to gender budgeting and to introduce an effective monitoring of the implementation of this declaration by including a provision in the post-electoral revision clause of the post 2020 MFF regulation;
Amendment 51 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Believes that post-2020 period there is the need to find a legally sound instrument for the possibility of future EU military capacity-building measures outside of a renewed IcSP; underlines that future EU military capacity-building in support of security and development should not be financed via transfers from other external action budgets such as the neighbourhood policy (ENI), the police and rule-of-law missions (CFSP), development policy (DCI), or the buffer for unforeseen international crisis;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is convinced that the next MFF should build on the Union’s well- established policies and priorities, which aim at protecting the planet, taking care of the people and investing in the future in the EU and for the world; moreover, believes that promoting peace, democracy and human rights, atfighting against climate change boosting welfare, long- term and sustainable economic growthdevelopment, high- quality jobs, sustainable developmentresearch and innovation, and at fostering economic, social and territorial cohesion as well as solidarity between Member States and citizens, territories and citizens should remained the main objectives of the EU budget; considers that these pillars are prerequisites for a properly functioning single market and Economic and Monetary Union as well as for reinforcing Europe’s position in the world; trusts that they are more relevant than ever for Europe’s future endeavours;
Amendment 78 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the next MFF should enable the Union to provide solutions and emerge strengthened from the crises of the decade: the economic and financial downturn, the phenomenon of migration and refugees, climate change environmental degradation, biodiversity loss and natural disasters, terrorism and instability, to name but a few; underlines that these global, cross-border challenges with domestic implications reveal the interdependency of our economies and societies, and point to the need for joint actions;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that the next MFF provides an opportunity for the Union to demonstrate that it stands together and is able to address political developments such as Brexit, the rise of nationalist populist and xenophobic movements and changes in global leadership; underlines that divisions and self-centredness are not an answer to global issues and to citizens’ concerns; considers that the Brexit negotiations, in particular, show that the benefits of being a Union member greatly outweigh the cost of contributing to its budget; considers therefore that we are all winners in the European project;
Amendment 93 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls, therefore, for continuous support for existing policies, in particular the long-standing EU policies enshrined in the Treaties, namely the common agricultural and fisheries policies, and the cohesion policy; rejects any attempt to renationalise these policies, as this would neither reduce the financial burden on taxpayers and consumers, nor achieve better results, but would instead hamper growth and the functioning of the single market while widening the disparities between territories and economic sectors; intends to secure the samreduce moderately in a fair and sustainable way the level of funding for the EU-27 for these policies in the next programming period while further improving their added value and simplifying the procedures associated with them; intends therefore to reduce the share of the 2 main blocks to roughly half of the EU budget;
Amendment 107 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that Europe should offer prospects to the younger generation as well as to the future-oriented undertakings that make the EU more successful in the global arena; is determined to substantially scale up two offuture-oriented policies should be double in volume in order to invest in the future generations, in the future technologies and in the future infrastructures; is determined to substantially scale up Youth-related programmes such as ERASMUS +and Youth Employment Initiative (YEI); is in favour of increasing the its flagship programmes, namely the Research Framework Programme and Erasmus+, which cannot satisfy the very high demand involving top quality applications with their current means; calls also for progress to be made in the fight against youth unemployment and in support for small and medium- sized enterprises by equipping the successor programmes of the Youth Employment Initiative and the programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and medium-sized enterprises (COSME) with greater financial means;, supports also in massive increase for the CEF 2.0; is in favour of a massive increase for cultural programmes)
Amendment 122 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Union to assume its role in two emerging policy areas with internal and external dimensions, which have appeared in the course of the current MFF: on the one hand, by developing a comprehensive asylum, migration and integration policy and addressing the root causes of migration and displacement in third countriescommon security and justice policy covering the fields of asylum, migration and integration and on the other hand, by providing security to European citizens and promoting stability abroad, notably by pooling research efforts and capabilities in the area of defencend peace abroad;
Amendment 149 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that a stronger and a more ambitious Europe can only be achieved if it is provided with reinforced financial means; calls, in the light of the above- mentioned challenges and priorities, and taking into account the UK’s withdrawal from the Union, for a significant increase of the Union’s budget;guaranteeing that the EU budget will not decrease compare to the MFF ceilings in 2020 and estimates the required MFF expenditure ceilings at 1.3 % of the GNI of the EU-27, notwithstanding the range of instruments to be counted over and above the ceilings;
Amendment 161 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls1a the budgetary principles of unity, budgetary accuracy, annuality, equilibrium, universality, specification, additionality, sound financial management and transparency, which need to be respected when establishing and implementing the Union budget; __________________ 1a AM suggested by NABU - Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.
Amendment 169 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3 a (new)
Subheading 3 a (new)
coherence of the EU budget1a __________________ 1a AM suggested by NABU - Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.
Amendment 170 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls1a on the Union to sustainability proof the next MFF, which can increase the efficiency of the Union spending by increasing coherence and balancing economic, social and environmental dimensions as required by the Treaty, through identifying the key areas where adjustments are needed and developing specific and targeted proposals for change in substantive, procedural and institutional tools throughout the policy and implementation cycles of the MFF. __________________ 1a AM suggested by NABU - Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.
Amendment 172 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Believes that the EU budget should reflect the majority vote of the EU citizens; therefore considers that the MFF should be adopted by a Qualified Majority in the Council as provided for in Article 312(2) of the TFEU and by a Qualified Majority in the EP;
Amendment 174 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Is of the opinion that the decision on the duration of the MFF should strike the right balance between two seemingly conflicting requirements: on the one hand, the need for several EU policies – especially those under shared management, such as agriculture and cohesion – to operate on the basis of the stability and predictability of a commitment of at least seven years, and, on the other hand, the need for democratic legitimacy and accountability that results from the synchronisation of each financial framework with the five- year political cycle of the European Parliament and the European Commission and, on the other hand, the need for several EU policies – especially those under shared management, such as agriculture and cohesion – to operate on the basis of the stability and predictability;
Amendment 176 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Is of the opinion that the best option is a 5 + 5 year-long MFF; However, considers that the non- negotiable condition to agree on a 10year- long EU budget is too have a sunset clause by the end of 2025 unless there is a post-electoral revision clause adopted by Qualified Majority in 2025; believes that the first political act of the newly elected EU commission in 2024 should be to present a revision of the 2021-2030 MFF according to the outcome of the EU 2024 elections and taking into account the Parliament and Council majorities; is convinced that if the conditions are not met for a 5 + 5 year long MFF, the 7 years represents the second best option;
Amendment 177 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses that in case of a 7 year MFF it is a political imperative for each newly elected Parliament and Commission to be able to substantially influence the MFF during its electoral cycle, both in terms of amounts and political priorities; stresses that the European Parliament elections provide the opportunity for EU citizens to express directly their position on the budgetary priorities of the Union that should be reflected in a binding post- electoral adjustmentrevision of the financial framework by a Qualified Majority; believes, therefore, that during each political cycle, the Commission shouldall propose and both Parliament and Council shouldall decide either on the establishment of the subsequent MFF or on a mandatory mid- term revision of the ongoing MFF;
Amendment 178 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 183 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
Amendment 189 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Is convinced of the necessity to maintain a legally binding and compulsory MFF mid-term review andpost electoral revision, enshrined in the new MFF Regulation; recalls that the 2016 mid-term revision was the historic first occasion on which an actual revision of the MFF Regulation took place and that was assessed positively by both Council and Parliament, notably in terms of reinforcing the MFF flexibility provisions;
Amendment 190 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Considers that, for the best option (2021-202730 MFF), the mid-termpost electoral revision to be done by the end of2025 should be the first political act of the newly elected Commission; is of the opinion that this revision could lead to a partial or full revision of some legal bases and programs; however stresses that, for the second best option (2021-2027 MFF), the post electoral revision should be proposed and decided in due time to allow for the next Parliament and Commission to adjust the financial framework accordingly; underlines that any revision of the MFF should ensure the involvement of Parliament and safeguard its prerogatives as an equal arm of the budgetary authority; underlines, moreover, that any real revision also entails the revision of the MFF ceilings, should their inadequacy be established for the rest of the period;
Amendment 212 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Notes, in particular, the significant mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund to provide assistance in an increased number of serious climate-related natural disasters with substantial budgetary consequences; stresses also the positive impact that this instrument has on public opinion; proposes the reinforcement of its financial envelope to an annual allocation of EUR 1 billion;
Amendment 218 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Considers that the use of the EGF, providing EU solidarity and support to workers losing their jobs as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns arising from globaliszation or as a result of the global economic and financial crisis, has not lived up to expectations and needs to be improved; points out, inter alia, that the procedures for implementing support from the EGF are too time- consuming and cumbersome; believes that a revised EGF should be endowed with at least an identical annual allocation under the new MFF and should be oriented towards providing solutions for workers from high-carbon and energy-intensive sectors in line with a zero-carbon economy by 2050;;
Amendment 240 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
Paragraph 44
44. Agrees that the search for European added value should be one of the main principles guiding the EU institutions when deciding about the type of spending in the next MFF; points out, however, the existence of multiple interpretations of the concept and calls for a clear definition of the criteria thereof that should be based on sustainability and the balanced approach to environmental, social and economic aspects and take territorial specificities into account;
Amendment 265 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48
Paragraph 48
48. Underlines that the ‘health check’ of EU spending cannot provide for a reduction in the level of EU ambition or a sectoralisation of EU policies and programmes, nor should it lead to a replacement of grants by financial instruments with a view to generating some savings, as the great majority of actions supported by the EU budget are not suitable to be funded by the latter and would limit access by civil society, therefore the mix of funding modalities, grant sizes that suit the variety of applicants should be increased;
Amendment 270 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
49. Calls for a far-reaching harmoniszation of the rules with the aim of creating a single rulebook for all EU budgetary instrumenthile urging that each fund be governed under its own rules, taking account of sector-specific characteristics, diverse territorial needs and different target groups, in order to provide for a funding environment tailored to specific circumstances; encourages the Commission to tackle the issue of the combination of various sources of funding by providing clear guidelines in this respect;
Amendment 273 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
Paragraph 50
50. Advocates also a real simplification of sectorial implementation rules for beneficiaries and a reduction of administrative burdens whilst ensuring a harmonised interpretation and incorporate easier access to grants through less administrative burden and simpler procedures across all funding instruments, together with more capacity building, information and technical assistance especially for small applicants, while ensuring proper use of fund through clear spending rules, monitoring and evaluation at the same time;
Amendment 277 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
Paragraph 52
52. Questions the justification and added value of establishing instruments outside the Union budget; considers that decisions to set up or maintain such instruments are in reality driven by attempts to conceal the real financial needs and to bypass the constraints of the MFF and own resources ceilings; deplores that they often also result in bypassing Parliament in its triple responsibility as legislative, budgetary and control authority; is therefore of the firm opinion that all instruments should be established inside the EU budget with an adjustment of the MFF ceilings accordingly;
Amendment 282 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
Paragraph 54
Amendment 287 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55 a (new)
Paragraph 55 a (new)
55a. Believes1a that it is important to strengthen the transparency of the MFF in the next period, and, in this regard, highlights the untapped potential to connect with the EU’s digital agenda by using innovative European digital platforms to make information about the objectives, beneficiaries and results of EU spending and lending more visible and accessible to citizens and investors; __________________ 1a AM suggested by NABU - Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.
Amendment 291 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
Paragraph 58
58. Calls for the future payment ceilings to be set at an appropriate level, leaving only a limited and realistic gap between the level of commitment and payment appropriations andthe same level of the commitment ceilings; reminds that the payments are a logic and legal consequences of the commitments and therefore commitments will become payments; stresses that the payment ceilings does not fix the level of payment for the annual budgets, to be adopted by the two branches of the budgetary authority, but the maximum level which could be agreed upon; therefore considers that any technical measures should be used in order to avoid payment to be made; - especially in order takinge into account the need to honour the commitments stemming from the current financial period that will turn into payments only after 2020;
Amendment 295 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60
Paragraph 60
60. Recognises the potential of financial instruments to increase the economic and political impact of the Union budget; highlights, however, that they can be applied only for revenue-generating projects and therefore constitute only a complementary rather thanoption to the grant system and should not be seen as an alternative form of funding as compared to grants, as some projects can be financed only through subsidies; stresses therefore that Financial Instruments are not bound by the Objectives and goals; calls on the Commission to revise all Financial Instruments, including EFSI, in order to make them bound by the post EU2020 strategy, goals and objectives and compatible with the Paris Climate agreement and/or the Agenda 2030;
Amendment 301 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
Paragraph 61
61. Recalls its request to the Commission to identify EU policy areas where grants could be combined with financial instruments and to reflect on a proper balance between the two; is convinced that subsidies should remain the predominant way of funding the EU project in the next MFF; underlinestresses the lack of accountability and the low level of reporting on results achieved in the real economy and the high management fees of the financial instruments; therefore considers that loans, guarantees, risk- sharing and equity financing should be used with caution, based on appropriate ex- ante assessments and only when their use can demonstrate a clear added value and a leverage effect;
Amendment 308 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 62
Paragraph 62
62. Calls on the Commission to simplify and harmonise the rules governing the use of financial instruments in the next MFF in order to maximise their efficient application; considers the option of a single fund that would integrate financial instruments at EU level that are centrally managed under such programmes as the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), Horizon 2020, COSME, Creative Europe and the Employment and Social Innovation programme (EaSI) on the one hand and the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) on the other, a proposal to be discussed further; is of the opinion that such an umbrella solution should provide for a clear structure for the choice of different types of financial instruments for different policy areas and types of actions; underlines, however, that such a fund could never integrate financial instruments managed by Member States under cohesion policy or fund projects at odds with the EU’s domestic and international commitments;
Amendment 314 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 64 a (new)
Paragraph 64 a (new)
64a. Considers that the structure of the MFF should also reflect the EU economy and include programme and instruments supporting entrepreneurship and all of its business forms from individual projects to joint projects, such as cooperative enterprises;
Amendment 327 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66 a (new)
Paragraph 66 a (new)
66a. Insists on the fact that the Paris Climate agreement should be the main axis of the post 2020 MFF; therefore considers that all policies and programs should be deeply reformed in order to make them the most COP21compatible in order to get at least 50% Climate-related spending in the post-2020 MFF;
Amendment 328 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66 b (new)
Paragraph 66 b (new)
66b. Is of the opinion that in order to protect our Planet, to take care of the people and to invest in our future in the EU and for the World, nuclear-related, gas-related, road-related and defence- related expenditures should be excluded from any kind of direct or indirect support from the EU budget; consequently, the EU budget should no longer finance directly or indirectly fossil fuel infrastructures in EU and abroad;
Amendment 332 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 16
Subheading 16
Amendment 335 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 67
Paragraph 67
67. Highlights1a the importance of completing the European research area, the energy union and the digital single market as fundamental elements of the European single market; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future''
Amendment 338 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 68
Paragraph 68
68. Believes1a that2a the next MFF should see a greater concentration of budgetary resources in areas that demonstrate a clear European added value and stimulate economic growth, competitiveness and employmentmake the European economy stronger and more resilient by promoting long- term competitiveness, sustainability and solidarity; stresses, in this context, the importance of research and innovation in creating a sustainable, world-leading, knowledge-based economy, and regrets that, due to the lack of adequate financing, only a small proportion of high-quality projects in this field has received EU funding under the current MFF; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future'' 2a AM suggested by NABU - Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.
Amendment 349 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69
Paragraph 69
69. Calls1a, therefore, for a substantial increase in the overall budget earmarked for the FP9Horizon 2030 programme in the next MFF that should be set at a level of at least EUR 1205 billion; considers this level to be appropriate for securing Europe’s global competitiveness, scientific and industrial leadership, for responding to societal challenges, and for helping to achieve the EU’s climate goals; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future''
Amendment 358 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 70
Paragraph 70
70. Calls1a, furthermore, for a greater focus on implementing research and innovation through joint undertakings and for supporting investment in key technologies to close the investment gap in innovation; emphasises that the increase in funds must be coupled with a simplification of funding procedures; welcomes the Commission’s efforts in this respect and insists that these should continue under the next programming period; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future''
Amendment 366 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 71
Paragraph 71
71. Stresses1a that SMEs, including cooperatives, are key drivers of economic growth, innovation and employment and recognises their important role in ensuring the recovery and boosting of a sustainable EU economy; recalls that there are more than 20 million SMEs in the EU and that they account for 99 % of all businesses; considers that improving access to finance for SMEs should continue to remain an important policy objective for the next MFF and calls, therefore, for a doubling of the COSME programme’s financial envelope in order for it to correspond to the actual needs of the EU economy and the significant demand for participation; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future''
Amendment 374 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 72
Paragraph 72
72. Reiterates1a its strong commitment to EFSI that aims at mobilising EUR 500 billion in new investment in the real economy under the current MFF; believes that EFSI has already delivered a powerful and targeted boost to economic sectors that are conducive to sustainable growth and jobs; welcomes, therefore, the Commission’s intention to put forward a legislative proposal for the continuation and improvement of this investment scheme under the new MFF; stresses that any legislative proposal should be based on the conclusions of a Commission review and independent evaluation; and that all spending at odds with the EU’s domestic and international commitments should be excluded from eligibility; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future''
Amendment 378 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 72 a (new)
Paragraph 72 a (new)
Amendment 384 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 73
Paragraph 73
73. Insists1a on2a the importance of the MFF for sectors relying on long-term investment, such as the sustainable transport sector; highlights that transport infrastructures are the backbone of the single market and the basis for sustainable growthdevelopment and job creation; notes that accomplishing a single European transport area connected to neighbouring countries requires major transport infrastructure and must be treated as a key priority in terms of the EU’s competitiveness and for economic, social and territorial cohesion, including for peripheral areas; considers, therefore, that the next MFF should provide for sufficient funding for projects that contribute in particular to the completion of the TEN-T core network and its corridors, which should be further extended; stresses that an updated and more effective CEF programme should cover all modes of transport in line with the EU's climate and energy commitments and focus on interconnections and the completion of the network in peripheral areas while using common standards; to further connectivity and restoration of habitats, the trans-European Network for Green Infrastructure (TEN-G) should be established and financed inter alia through CEF; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future'' 2a AM suggested by NABU - Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.
Amendment 396 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 74
Paragraph 74
74. Underlines1a the importance of ensuring financing for completing the digital single market by making full use of the spectrum, 5G deployment and gigabit connectivity, and by making further progress on the harmonisation of EU telecom rules to create the right regulatory framework for the improvement of internet connectivity throughout the Union; stresses that CEF Telecom should continue to support the Digital Service Infrastructures and the broadband networks by enabling their accessibility, including in remote regions and rural areas, and by improving digital literacy, interconnectivity and interoperability; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future''
Amendment 407 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 75
Paragraph 75
75. Considers1a it2a essential to secure a sustainable and affordable energy supply in Europe; calls, therefore, for continuous support for investments ensuring the diversification of energy sources, increasing energy security and enhancing energy efficiency, including by CEF Energy; stresses in particular the importance of providing for comprehensive support, especially for carbon-intensive regions, energy transition, transition to a low-carbon and nuclear-free economy, the modernisation of power generation and grids, carbon capture storage and utilisation technologiesmart grids, and the modernisation of district heating; considers that the transformation of the energy sector in the light of the climate objectives shouldall be supported by the creation of an Energy Transition Fund under the next MFF that would facilitate the structural changes in energy-intensive industries and carbon- intensive electricity production plants, and create incentives for low-carbon, nuclear- free investments and innovative solutions; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future'' 2a AM partly suggested by NABU - Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V.
Amendment 417 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 76
Paragraph 76
76. Underlines1a the strategic importance of large-scale infrastructure projects such as the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay (EGNOS), the Global Satellite Navigation System (Galileo) and the Earth Observation Programme (Copernicus) for the EU’s future competitiveness; considers that the financing of these large-scale projects should be secured in the EU budget but, at the same time, ring-fenced, so as to ensure that possible cost overruns do not threaten the funding and successful implementation of other Union policies, as was the case in the previous MFF; recalls that, for this purpose, the maximum amount for these projects is currently fixed in the MFF Regulation, and calls for similar provisions in the new regulation; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in the future''
Amendment 421 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 77
Paragraph 77
77. Affirms that the common agricultural policy is fundamental for food security ’s objectives should be radically reviewed to reflect social demands autonomy, the preservationnd the finite limits of roural populations, sustainable development and the provision of high- quality and affordable food products for Europeans; points out that food requirements have increased, as environment and planetary resources, and to take into account climate change, extinction and ecosystem collapse, and depletion of resources that affects us all. We believe thast the need to develop environmentally friendly farming practices and the need to tackle climate changeCAP should be used at reinvigorating local economies in order to get vibrant rural communities; focusing on healthy diets and organic farming; and supporting farmers’ autonomy and their role in the transition; underlines that the CAP is one of the most integrated policies and is mainly financed at EU level and, therefore, replaces national spending;
Amendment 439 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 78
Paragraph 78
78. Expects the global amount of direct paymentstresses that 30% of the CAP subsidies tgo be kept intact under the next MFF, as they generate clear EU added value and strengthen the single market by avoiding distortions of competition between Member States; opposes any renationalisation and any national co-financing in that respect; stresses the need to increase funding in line with responses to the various cyclical crises in sensitive sectors, to create new instruments that can mitigate price volatility and to increase funding for Programmes of Options Specifically Relating to Remoteness and Insularity (POSEI)to 1% of the farmers receiving more than 50 000€ per annum and per beneficiary; proposes therefore to cap direct payments at 50 000€ per annum and per beneficiary; insists that part of those savings should be redistributed in a fair and sustainable way in the CAP budget mainly for new and smaller farmers, for organic farming...; insists on the fact that only 1% of the EU farmers would be impacted by such capping; opposes any renationalisation and any national co-financing in that respect; concludes, therefore, that the CAP budget in the next MFF should be at least maintained at its current level for the EU-27reduced slightly in a fair and sustainable way ;
Amendment 461 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 79
Paragraph 79
79. Stresses the socioeconomic and ecological importance of the fisheries sector, the ‘blue economy’ and their contribution to the food autonomy of the EU; points out that the common fisheries policy is an exclusive EU competence; emphasises, in this respect, the need to keep a specific, substantial, independent and accessible fisheries fund to implement this policy; calls, at least, for the level of financial appropriations dedicated to the fisheries sector under the current MFF to be maintained and, if new needs arise, to increase the financial appropriations for maritime affairs; warns about the possible negative impacts of a hard Brexit on this sector; notes that other financial instruments, in addition to non-repayable aid, could provide complementary financing possibilities; stresses that the fisheries policy is a critically important fund for promoting the transformation of fishing into an environmentally sustainable industry that maintains fish at abundant levels and allows profitable fishing that no longer requires financial support; is of the opinion that the Fund must continue its transformation away from direct subsidies to the fleet to measures to reduce the environmental impact of fishing, provide safe and healthy food and ensure sufficient money for scientific research and fisheries controls;
Amendment 466 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 80
Paragraph 80
80. Stresses the importance of the EU’s leading role in tackling climate change and its internal and external biodiversity commitments and goals; asks for appropriate financial resources to be provided to implement the Paris agreementat LIFE + is one key programme in order to contribute to the shift towards a resource-efficient, low- carbon and climate- resilient economy, to the protection and improvement of the quality of the environment and to halting and reversing biodiversity loss, including the support of the Natura 2000 network and tackling the degradation of ecosystems; asks for tripling its budget and to spend, at least, 1% of the EU budget for LIFE +; furthermore asks for appropriate financial resources to be provided to implement the Paris agreement, the Agenda 2030 for sustainable development and the targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and thorough climate and environment mainstreaming of future EU spending; recalls that the next MFF should help the Union to achieve its 2030 climate and energy framework objectives; underlines that the EU should not finance projects and investments that are contrary to the achievement of these goals;
Amendment 479 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 17
Subheading 17
Amendment 480 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 81
Paragraph 81
81. Stresses that cohesion policy post- 2020 should remain the main investment policy of the European Union covering all EU regions while concentrating the majority of the resources on the most vulnerable ones; believes that, beyond the goal of reducing the disparities between levels of development and enhancing convergence as enshrined in the Treaty, it should focus on the achievement of the broad EU political objectives and proposes, therefore, that under the next MFF, the three cohesion policy funds – the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Fund – shouldall concentrate mainly on providing support for innovation, digitalisation, reindustrialisation, SMEs, transport, climate change adaptationjust transition, SMEs, sustainable mobility, climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity and green infrastructure, employment and social inclusion and fight against poverty; calls, moreover, for a reinforced territorial cooperation component and an urban dimension for the policy; calls on the commission to include in its post 2020Cohesion policy concrete measures in order to make the article 174(3) of the TFEU a reality; considers that ‘‘rural areas, are as affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density and island, cross- border and mountain regions’’ should also be taken into account as enshrined in the treaties;
Amendment 499 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82
Paragraph 82
82. Considers that cohesion policy post-2020 could be slightly reduced compare to the level of the 2014-2020 budget ; insists on the fact that the least developed regions should maintaining the financing of cohesion policy post- 2020 for the EU-27 at least at the level of the 2014- 2020 budget to be of the utmost importance; stresses that GDP should remain one of the parameters for the allocation of cohesion policy funds, but believes that it should be complemented by an additional set of social, environmental and demographic indicators to better take into account new types of inequalities between EU regions; supports, in addition, the continuation under the new programming period of the elements that rendered cohesion policy more modern and performance-oriented under the current MFF;
Amendment 525 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83
Paragraph 83
83. Is strongly committed to the delivery of Social Europe and the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights, and points to the existing instruments contributing to these goals, notably the ESF, the Youth Employment Initiative, the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived, the EGF and EaSI; believes that they shouldall be safeguarded in the next MFF; considers that the ESF has a key role to play in combatting poverty and supporting social inclusion; proposes therefore to increase to, at least, 30% of the total combined CP funds to the ESF in each Member states and, at least, to 35% in the Member states with unemployment rates significantly higher than the EU average;
Amendment 531 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83 a (new)
Paragraph 83 a (new)
83a. Is convinced that the main strengths of the CP should be kept and reinforced after 2020(co-financing system, ex ante conditionality's, multi- level governance, bottom-up approach...); however continues to reject macro- economic conditionality in cohesion policy or any kind of sanction mechanism based on economic governance arrangements which punishes EU regions and beneficiaries for decisions taken at central government level;
Amendment 534 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83 b (new)
Paragraph 83 b (new)
83b. Defends an alternative conditionality in cases which could fall into the so-called ‘‘rule-of-law conditionality’’; proposes that the principle of shared management should be temporarily suspended and that the CP funding would be directly managed by the European commission in close collaboration with regional and local authorities in case of a breach of law by a Member State; is convinced that it would better prevent state governments from misbehaving and will allow the EU to still take care of the people in the different territories;
Amendment 538 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83 c (new)
Paragraph 83 c (new)
83c. Is of the opinion to increase the funding for the programmes contributing to the further development of an area where equality and the rights of persons, as enshrined in the Treaty, the Charter and international human rights conventions, are promoted and protected such as ‘‘rights, equality and citizenship’’ programs; considers that the latter should be increased fivefold and DAPHNE which aims to contribute to the protection of children, young people and women against all forms of violence should get a separate budget line and autonomous programme with a budget multiplied by 10;
Amendment 541 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83 d (new)
Paragraph 83 d (new)
83d. Furthermore, calls on the Commission to create a dedicated and separate budget line for ''Promote equality between women and men and gender mainstreaming'' in order to implement gender budgeting;
Amendment 542 #
Amendment 543 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83 e (new)
Paragraph 83 e (new)
83e. Considers that the ''investing in the future'' encompassing the future- oriented programs should become the first spending block of the EU budget slightly bigger than the 2 first spending blocks;
Amendment 545 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 84
Paragraph 84
84. Emphasises in particular thethat the youth is still unfairly impacted by the consequences of the financial and economic crisis; considers therefore that there is a continuous need to fight unemployment, especially among young people, and calls, therefore, for a doubling ofmultiplying eightfold the Youth Employment Initiative envelope in the next programming period in order to be equivalent to the ERASMUS program; considers that investment to boost education and training, especially the development of digital skills, remains one of the top priorities of the EU;
Amendment 568 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 85
Paragraph 85
85. Expresses support for programmes in the areas of culture, education, media, youth, sports and citizenship that have clearly demonstrated their European added value and enjoy lasting popularity among beneficiaries; advocates, therefore, continuous investment in the Education and Training 2020 framework through the Erasmus+, Creative Europe and Europe for Citizens programmes in order to pursue reaching out to young people and providing them with valuable competences and life skills through lifelong learning, learner-centred and non-formal education, as well as informal learning opportunities; calls in particular for a tripling ofbudgeting up fivefold the Erasmus+ envelope in the next MFF with the aim of reaching many more young people and learners across Europe, and achieving the full potential of the programme; recommends, moreover, the continuation of the European Solidarity Corps and reiterates its support for strengthening the external dimension of the Erasmus+ and Creative Europe programmes;
Amendment 571 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 85 a (new)
Paragraph 85 a (new)
85a. Proposes moreover that all Cultural programmes, such as Europe for Citizens, Creative Europe, which deliver an unquestionable EU added value for the EU budget to be increased tenfold; believes in the European motto ‘‘Unity in diversity’’ and considers that it should be translated into programmes supporting all languages despite their legal status, by promoting the common EU heritage and patrimony, by strengthening the exchange programmes and/or by enhancing twining programs for EU territories and cities for instance;
Amendment 583 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 86
Paragraph 86
86. Expects1a that in the post-2020 period, the European Union will move from crisis-management mode to a permanent, European policy in the field of asylum and migration; stresses that the actions in this field should be covered by a dedicated instrument, i.e. the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund accessible for local, regional or national authorities;; emphasises that the future fund, as well as the relevant Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies, must be equipped with an adequate level of funding for the whole of the next MFF to address the comprehensive challenges in this area; believes, furthermore, that the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) should be complemented by additional components the root causes of tackling this issue under other policies, in particular by the cohesion funds and the instruments financing external actions, as no single tool could hope to address the magnitude and complexity of needs in this field; recognises, moreover, the importance of cultural, educational and sports programmes in integrating refugees and migrants into European society; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Investing in our common security and Justice''
Amendment 590 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 87
Paragraph 87
87. Recognises1a the European added value of collaboration in addressing common public health threats; notes that no single Member State can tackle cross- border health challenges alone, and calls for the next MFF to reflect the EU’s responsibility to support Member States in reducing health inequalities; considers that, on the basis of the positive outcome of the ongoing actions in this field, the next MFF should include a robust next generation Health programme that addresses these issues on a cross-border basis; recalls that good health is a prerequisite for achieving other goals set by the EU and that policies in such fields as agriculture, environment, employment, social issues or inclusion also have an impact on the health of Europeans; calls, therefore, for the strengthening of health impact assessments and for cross- sectoral cooperation in the next MFF in this field; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapter ''Protecting the Planet''
Amendment 595 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 18
Subheading 18
Amendment 596 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 87 a (new)
Paragraph 87 a (new)
87a. Is of the firm opinion that the EU should be consistent in its budgetary policy; thus, considers that the 3 main pillars (protecting the Planet, taking care of the people and investing in the future) should be reflected in the external affairs’ budget; furthermore believes that the budget for EU’s external actions should acknowledge our responsibility and show our solidarity by fighting poverty worldwide and defends human rights through increased aid budget in line with 2030 Agenda and the UN SDG;
Amendment 597 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 87 b (new)
Paragraph 87 b (new)
87b. Is of the opinion that the EU budget should primarily be used to support Peace, Human rights, civil societies and NGOs; furthermore considers that ‘‘more for more and less for less’’ principle should be applied in its two components in a proportional but consistent way; is of the opinion that, in a changing world, the EU should fine-tune its external policy and adopt a country- specific approach rather than keeping its regional/bloc policy; finally believes that, in order to be coherent, the EU external policies, particularly the trade policy, should be aligned to the EU’s international commitments and objectives;
Amendment 598 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 87 c (new)
Paragraph 87 c (new)
87c. Strives for simplifying and strengthening the budget of the EU external policy; is convinced that 2/3 of the budget for the world should be dedicated for Peace and human rights, humanitarian aid and sustainable development;
Amendment 599 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 87 d (new)
Paragraph 87 d (new)
87d. proposes therefore to triple the budget for Stability and Peace and to double the CFSP budget;
Amendment 601 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 88
Paragraph 88
88. Stresses that the world is confronted with multiple challenges including conflicts, cyber-attacks, terrorism, disinformation, natural disasters, climate change and environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, human rights violations and protracted crises; believes that the Union has a particular political and financial responsibility which is founded on rules-based foreign policy, cooperation with partner countries and development effectiveness principles, poverty eradication and crisis response; expects the EU, given the universality of the 2030 Agenda and its treaty obligation to ensure Policy Coherence for sustainable Development, to support policies and funding which are consistent and not detrimental to partner countries’ efforts in achieving sustainable development;
Amendment 615 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 89
Paragraph 89
89. Emphasises that substantial additional funding is necessary for the Union to play its role in the framework of its global strategy and of its neighbourhood, development and enlargement policies and to address the most pressing needs of people and communities who face the multifaceted challenges of climate change, environmental degradation, poverty and inequality, including gender inequality; draws attention to the commitment by the EU and its Member States to increase their official development assistance (ODA) to 0.7 % of GDP by 2030; expects the next MFF to reflect the unprecedented needs of neighbourhood countries struggling with conflicts and the consequences of the challenges presented by migration and refugees, as well as the needs for humanitarian aid as a result of natural and manmade disasters; expects the next MFF to deliver on EU’s international commitments on climate and biodiversity, increasing the current benchmark for climate relevant spending in external instruments, ensuring a balance between adaptation and mitigation funding, focusing on the most vulnerable developing countries, as well as to follow through on the commitment in the EU development consensus to mainstream climate and environment in EU external financing and to maintain and extend support to civil society;
Amendment 629 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90 a (new)
Paragraph 90 a (new)
90a. Notes with interest the proposal put forward by the President of the EIB to establish a European Development Bank; calls for a thorough assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the current European actors; calls for an open and transparent debate with all stakeholders in order to develop the best possible architecture for such operations in order to bring about the best development impacts;
Amendment 636 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 19
Subheading 19
Amendment 640 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 91
Paragraph 91
91. Believes that a new heading dedicated to ‘Security, peace and stability for all’''common security and justice'' would be a demonstration of the priority given by the Union to this emerging policy responsibility, acknowledge its specificity, and achieve consistency between its internal and external dimensions;
Amendment 651 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 93
Paragraph 93
Amendment 663 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 94
Paragraph 94
94. In1a the context of the increased attention given to security and defence in the Union, requests a reassessment of all external security expenditure; looks forward in particular to a reform of the Athena mechanism and of the African Peace Facility after the budgetisation of the EDF; welcomes the recent commitments by Member States under permanent structured cooperation and asks the High Representative and the Commission to provide clarification as regards its future financing; calls for a successor programme for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace focusing on crisis response and capacity building for security and development, while finding a legally sound solution for military; __________________ 1aparagraph to be placed under the chapacity building;ter ''a budget for the World''
Amendment 666 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 20
Subheading 20
An efficient administration at the service of Europeans budget for the Administration
Amendment 676 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 96 a (new)
Paragraph 96 a (new)
96a. Considers that the EU institutions and bodies should respect both the geographical balance and the gender balance, particularly by ensuring a composition of at least 40% of each gender at the junior and senior managerial positions by the end of 2024;
Amendment 677 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 96 b (new)
Paragraph 96 b (new)
96b. Is convinced that the EU budget should make some reasonable and targeted savings regarding its administrative budget while not weakening its highly qualified and performing staff and administration; believes that EP should have a single seat in Brussels; thus proposes, in return, a fair and equivalent solution for Strasbourg to be discussed within the framework of the MFF negotiations; furthermore, reminds that the staff regulation should be revised before 2024; proposes therefore to integrate all allowances in the taxable revenue; suggests to increase the progressiveness of the tax system for the EU staff; is of the opinion that the expatriated allowance should be transformed into a lump-sum system which should have a 5 year- phasing out period after a fix period of 10 years;
Amendment 679 #
2017/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99
Paragraph 99
99. Underlines that, with the Commission’s proposals due in May 2018, a formal decision on the next MFF should be taken within one year; insists that this timetable will allow, inter alia, for the swift adoption of all sectorial regulations most probably after the European elections, thus enabling the new programmes to start without delay on 1 January 2021; recalls that, in previous financial frameworks, the new programmes were essentially launched some years after the beginning of the period;
Amendment 32 #
2017/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. SupportsTakes note of the imminent launch of the EU-New Zealand free trade agreement negotiations;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2044(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Draws attention to recent worrying political developments in the Western Balkans that require the Union's urgent attention to avoid progress achieved in the past decades being put into question; rejects, therefore, the proposed cut of almost EUR 90 million to support for political reforms in the region under the Instrument for Pre-Accession assistance (IPA); supports the reduction of funding for Turkey under the "Support for economic, social and territorial development" line; believes however that an increase in EIDHR funding should be earmarked for Turkey in order to support civil society directly.
Amendment 16 #
2017/2044(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Opposes the drastic reductions of financial contributions from the external financial instruments ENI, IPA, PI and DCI to Erasmus+, despite the fact that youth exchange programs can be considered as one of the most successful long-term investments into cultural diplomacy and mutual understanding, and calls rather for an increase of these contributions;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2044(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the fact that the proposed appropriations for the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP) return to their pre-2017 levels and are further strengthened in view of new capacity building tasks which should result from the ongoing revision ofits role as the Union's only instrument for civilian conflict prevention; urges Member State to consider implementing the Union's new capacity building tasks for military actors within the appropriate legal framework, which is the CFSP; calls therefore on the Commission to withdraw its 5 July 2016 legislative amendment to the IcSP regulation;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2044(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of stimulating cooperative defence research, development, acquisition, and maintenance in Europe for addressing key capability shortfalls at a time when international developments increasingly require Europe to step up its efforts on defence; fully supports the idea of increased allocation for the Preparatory Action on defence researchpooling and sharing arrangements between Member States; calls on the Commission to start enforcing the 2009 defence procurement directive; urges Member States and the Commission to focus on methods which increase efficiency of national defence spending instead of diverting Union budget funds from existing programs such as Erasmus+, the European Regional Development Funds or the Connecting Europe Facility;
Amendment 4 #
2017/2043(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Calls for maintaining the EU support to sports policy, the sports chapter of the Erasmus+ programme and the financing of Special Events, such as the Special Olympics in 2017;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2015 on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect 1a, _________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0408.
Amendment 9 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 b (new)
Citation 9 b (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2016 on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect 2a, _________________ 2a Text adopted, P8_TA(2016)0310.
Amendment 10 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 c (new)
Citation 9 c (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 8 July 2015 on tax avoidance and tax evasion as challenges for governance, social protection and development in developing countries 3a, _________________ 3a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2015)0265.
Amendment 29 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas in many countries corruption not only constitutes a significant systemic obstacle to the realisation of all human rights and to the spread of democracy and political freedom, balanced and sustainable development and reduction of poverty across the world, but may also cause many human rights violations; whereas corruption is one of the most neglected human rights violations of our times as it fuels injustice, inequality and deprivation;
Amendment 33 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas corruption severely weakens states, thus possibly leading to social upheaval and major political instability, and even civil war or regional conflict;
Amendment 34 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
B b. whereas some governments or State agencies are reported to carry out acts of corruption of government officials or public institutions in third countries with a view to affecting public decisions in their favour; whereas such corruption instigated by States may also target media and influential policy makers; whereas a number of autocratic regimes are reported to carry out deliberate strategies of corruption of decision-makers and public officials in third countries, including EU Member States and institutions, in order to prevent criticism in the field of human rights at bilateral or multilateral level;
Amendment 37 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas corruption, far from being an abstract crime, has specific negative impacts on the enjoyment of human rights affecting individuals, targeted groupsvulnerable groups such as women, children, persons with disabilities, the elderly, the poor, indigenous people or people belonging to minorities, or society at large, notably as regards financial and economic resources and the realisation of democracy and the rule of law;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas many third countries do not yet have the capacity to exchange tax information with EU countries and thus they do not receive any information from EU countries on their citizens which potentially evade tax;
Amendment 60 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas developing countries are disproportionately affected by corporate tax avoidance, which is responsible for depriving them of the essential resources to fund public services and for undermining EU development cooperation policies;
Amendment 149 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that States are bound to fulfil their human rights obligations; underlines that States are responsible for reacting to any negative impact of corruption occurring in their territory; calls for States to establish private rights of action in civil proceedings for damages against those who commit acts of corruption in accordance with Article 35 of the UNCAC; recalls the responsibilities of business operators to respect human rights and tackle corruption; stresses the need to integrate a human rights perspective into anti-corruption strategies;
Amendment 155 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the need to mainstream the principle of local and democratic ownership of projects financed under EU assistance programmes; highlights the need to establish and operationalise conditionality andemphasizes that a strong focus on results and strengthened conditionality should be implemented with the specification of clear milestones and indicators and progress monitored rigorously through annual reporting; highlights the need to establish and operationalize incentives of EU external financial instruments based on anti- corruption norms and commitments made by partner countries;
Amendment 233 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Strongly recommends that the EU supports additional measures to promote the adoption and implementation of compliance, anti-bribery/-corruption codes and standards in individual companies; underlines that large companies bidding for public contracts should have in place a robust anti-bribery and anticorruption code and tax good governance principles;
Amendment 249 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Stresses that acts of corruption of officials in international organizations may severely undermine the credibility of these organizations as a whole, notably those active in the field of human rights or election observation, which should respect the highest degree of ethical standards; welcomes the recent decision by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe to set up an independent investigation to look into recent allegations of corruption of one of its members; encourages all international and regional organizations to establish the adequate safeguards to prevent third countries from undermining their credibility through corruption and to investigate any allegations of such conduct;
Amendment 251 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 b (new)
Paragraph 21 b (new)
21 b. Vigorously denounces any attempt by autocratic regimes in third countries to influence individual Members of the European Parliament through direct or indirect means; calls for a comprehensive assessment of the public diplomacy and other means of influence carried out by such regimes towards the European Parliament and its Members; calls for Parliament to adopt robust measures, including in relation to the hitherto informal and unregulated Friendship groups with third countries, in order to prevent such acts of corruption which undermine the credibility and legitimacy of the Parliament's action, including on human rights;
Amendment 266 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24 a. Strongly advocates for the implementation of public country by country reporting standards in Europe and in third countries, whereby multinational corporations should be required to submit reports with basic financial information for each jurisdiction in which they operate in order to prevent corruption and tax avoidance;
Amendment 271 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 b (new)
Paragraph 24 b (new)
24 b. Underlines the need to support developing countries in building their tax capacity and calls for the OECD Global Standard on Automatic Exchange of Information to include a transition period for developing countries (whereby the standard would not be reciprocal) so that those countries that still have low capacity to set up the necessary infrastructure to collect, manage and share the required information may effectively be included;
Amendment 275 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 c (new)
Paragraph 24 c (new)
24 c. Invites the Commission and the Member States, where appropriate, to conduct spill-over analysis of national and EU tax policies, in order to assess the impact on corruption and human rights in third countries, in line with their policy coherence for development commitment;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Goal 5 of the Sustainable Development Goals states that gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls is not only a fundamental human right, but a necessary foundation for a peaceful, prosperous and sustainable world; whereas providing women and girls with equal access to education, health care, decent work, and representation in political and economic decision-making processes will fuel sustainable economies and benefit societies and humanity at large;
Amendment 12 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to United Nations Security Council resolutions on women, peace and security 1325 (2000);1820 (2009);1888 (2009);1889 (2010);1960 (2011);2106 (2013);2122 (2013) and 2242 (2015),
Amendment 19 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that the role of the EU Delegations increased with the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty and that they now play a central role in implementing GAP II; notes that they are the first point of contact for coordination of EU efforts with international partners in the country in question, and highlights the requirement that they ensure the implementation of policies, including the mainstreaming, protection and promotion of gender equality; welcomes the appointment of gender focal points (GFP) in the Delegations but expresses concern about their workload and time constraints, since the tasks linked to the GFP are additional to their core or other responsibilities; notes that it is indispensable that the Delegations and the GFP develop a robust understanding of the gender context to inform country strategy objectives, programmes, projects, dialogue and their implementation; calls on the VP/HR and the EEAS to develop clear operational guidelines on the role of the focal points in Delegations so that they act as true human rights advisors and carry out their work effectively;
Amendment 21 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Deplores that according to the latest available EEAS statistics, only 20,6% of heads of EU delegations are women and that only one out of the seven EU Special Representatives is a woman, both statistics being below the 2014 baseline ratio of women as EU Heads of Missions; also deplores that women constitute only about 25 % of staff in CSDP civilian missions and that there are no comprehensive statistics available regarding the participation of women in CSDP military missions and operations; calls on the EEAS and the Council to lead by example and to take immediate corrective measures to improve the participation of women in external missions and to enhance their appointment to senior and high-profile positions within the EU and notably in EU Delegations;
Amendment 22 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Regrets that according to an EEAS report of November 2016, only a few EU CSDP missions have trainings on sexual or gender-based harassment and notes that in 2015 no cases of sexual or gender- based harassment, abuse or violence were reported by CSDP missions; stresses the importance of applying a zero-tolerance policy regarding cases of sexual or gender-based harassment and supporting institutional structures focused on preventing gender or sexual violence; calls on the EEAS and its Member States to support all efforts to combat sexual or gender-based violence in international peace-keeping operations and to ensure that whistle-blowers and victims are effectively protected;
Amendment 24 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Asks all institutions and political actors involved in the development of EU external action to prioritise compliance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child, its Protocols and the relevant international treaties in order to guarantee special protection and care for children; calls on the EEAS and Member States to urge the USA, as the last UN Member State not to have ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), to accede urgently to this instrument, thereby making the CRC the first universally ratified UN human rights convention; asks that the empowerment and human rights of girls be promoted, in the knowledge that empowerment requires the active participation of girls in decision- making processes; underlines that these points should be considered essential elements in the implementation of GAP II;
Amendment 25 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the principle of equality between women and men is enshrined in the EU Treaty and gender mainstreaming shall be promoimplemented in all EU activities as enshrined in Article 8 TFEU so as to deliver equality in practice;
Amendment 36 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas it is difficult to determine the budget allocated to actions pursuing gender equality as gender mainstreaming is not yet internalised in all budget allocations and spending decisions as part of a gender budgeting methodology;whereas according to the Commission EU financial commitments to gender equality have increased but the Commission’s and the EEAS’s human resource capacity to manage this increasing volume of work did not;
Amendment 39 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
D b. whereas gender equality tends to be absent from programme and project monitoring systems and evaluation processes and whereas gender analysis is hardly used in order to inform country strategy objectives, programmes, projects and dialogue;
Amendment 47 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets that in a global context of shrinking civil society space, Objective 18 focusing on women’s rights organisations and women’s human rights defenders is receiving insufficient attention; is concerned that the thematic priority on political and civil rights, specifically the enjoyment of women and girls of their political and civil rights, has been given limited priority in GAP II implementation;
Amendment 48 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the release in August 2017 of the first annual implementation report for the year 2016, which demonstrates a clearertain momentum towards the implementation of the GAP II;
Amendment 49 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the Commission, in the Joint Staff Working Document on the 2016-2020 framework, recognised that the EU’s financial investment in gender equality has not been systematically measured; calls on the Commission to adopt a clear results-driven approach that sets high standards for reporting, evaluation and accountability mechanisms and to promote evidence- based decision making in order to use the financial resources more efficiently and effectively; requests a report to determine exactly how much funding has been specifically committed to gender mainstreaming and to identify the most noteworthy goals achieved;
Amendment 50 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls the importance of sexual education and family planning as tools among others to foster women's empowerment and the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases; regrets that the persistence of unequal gender roles in society and the existence of a total or qualified ban on abortion poses a threat to the rights of women, especially to those from underdeveloped, rural areas; strongly condemns the reinstatement and expansion of the Global Gag Rule and its impact on women’s and girls’ global health care and rights; reiterates its call on the EU, together with its Member States, to fill the financing gap left by the USA in the area of sexual and reproductive health and rights, using EU development funding;
Amendment 52 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Notes that the concept of gender mainstreaming is still often poorly understood and that qualitative reporting which would allow an evaluation of the implementation of the Gender Action Plan into existing policies and projects is lacking;welcomes the efforts made in providing training to some implementing actors;
Amendment 53 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Strongly regrets that, as per the European Parliament's study on the implementation of the GAP II, current programming appears to side-line the gender dimension in situations of crisis or difficult conflicts and that, among other outcomes, this has meant that many girls and women victims of rape in the context of war do not have access to non- discriminatory care, specifically comprehensive medical care, including abortion, despite the aim of GAP II to empower women to have control over their sexual and reproductive life;
Amendment 55 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses the importance of continued implementation of the EU’s commitment to enhance girls and women’s physical and psychological integrity as one of the four pivotal areas of action, notably in relation to sexual and reproductive health and rights; in this context, calls on the EEAS and the Commission to prioritize their efforts towards third countries which continue to outlaw abortion under any circumstances, namely the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and the Vatican City;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls on the Commission to systematically implement the GAP II, including in humanitarian settings where it must provide non-discriminatory access to medical services, in line with international humanitarian law; calls once again on the Commission to actively inform its humanitarian partners that the Commission's policy foresees that, in cases where the pregnancy threatens a woman’s or a girl’s life or causes unbearable suffering, international humanitarian law and/or international human rights law may justify offering a safe abortion rather than perpetuating what amounts to inhumane treatment;
Amendment 61 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Recalls the obligation of the EU and the Member States to respect the rights of girls and women as migrants, refugees and asylum seekers, when implementing and developing the EU’s migration policy; in this context, calls for the reassessment of the engagement of the EUNAVFORMED Operation Sophia with the Libyan coast guards in light of the reports of systematic sexual violence against women in the detention centres on Libyan soil;
Amendment 74 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the expansion of the gender action plan to all EU external services and to the member states and notes the impoa certaint progress in shifting EU institutional cultureachieved at headquarters and delegation levels; reiterates however the need for continued improvements in coherence and coordination among EU institutions and member states while using the existing structures and budget;
Amendment 81 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Positively notes the practical steps towards culture change: placing the overall responsibility for reporting on the GAP lying with the head of delegation, an increased number of high level staff involved in the implementation of the GAP II and the appointment of an increasing number of gender champions and gender focal points in EU delegations; regrets however that only 20% of the gender focal point positions are covered and that no gender champions have been reported from fragile and conflict states; calls for more management level time to be dedicated to gender and for the remaining delegations to appoint their gender focal points. All gender focal points should be given sufficient time and capacity to carry out their tasks;
Amendment 94 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Notes that only a few recurrent components of gender equality are applied in programming and project selection;calls on implementing actors to use the whole scope of gender equality;
Amendment 96 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Strongly regrets that, as per the European Parliament's study assessment on the implementation of the GAP II, current programming appears to side-line the gender dimension in situations of crisis or difficult conflicts;and that, among other outcomes, this has meant that girls and women victims of war rape do not have access to non-discriminatory care, specifically comprehensive medical care, including abortion, despite the GAP II aiming to empower women to have control over their sexual and reproductive life;
Amendment 99 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8 c. Regrets that in a context of shrinking civil society space Objective 18 focusing on women’s rights organisations and women’s human rights defenders is receiving little attention;is concerned that the thematic priority on political and civil rights, specifically the participation of women and girls in political and civil rights, has been given little priority in GAP II implementation;
Amendment 115 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for strengthening human resource capacity dedicated to gender mainstreaming within the Commission services through tailored training and, rearrangement of the existing structures and additional staff; suggests that increased staff training as well as a gender focal point per unit and a gender coordination group across units in DG DEVCO, DG NEAR, DGECHO and the EEAS would better help to mainstream gender across the external policy units;
Amendment 118 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the guidance note of 8 March 2016 that outlines the resources and tools for the implementation of GAP II that applies to DG DEVCO and EEAS and calls for the implementation of a guidance note for all the European services involved in the implementation of GAP II;
Amendment 119 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. Calls on the Commission to systematically implement the GAP II, including in humanitarian settings where it must provide non-discriminatory access to medical services, in line with international humanitarian law;calls once again on the Commission to actively inform its humanitarian partners that the Commission's policy foresees that, in cases where the pregnancy threatens a woman’s or a girl’s life or causes unbearable suffering, international humanitarian law and/or international human rights law may justify offering a safe abortion rather than perpetuating what amounts to inhumane treatment;
Amendment 128 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the link between trade and gender is not sufficiently addressed in the GAP II; recalls in this respect that negotiation of trade agreements could be used as an effective tool for advancing equality between women and men and calls for all EU trade agreements to include referenclabour rights chapters and specific clauses ton women’s rights and gender equality;
Amendment 131 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Calls on the EEAS to promote the role of women as peace-builders, to encourage women’s participation in leadership and decision-making process, and to place these tasks at the core of the EU Global Strategy and Political Dialogues, particularly when it comes to conflict prevention and promoting human rights and democratic reform in post- conflict reconstruction;
Amendment 132 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11 b. Welcomes the thematic priority on economic and social Empowerment and the analysis of barriers in accessing productive resources including land and the corresponding activities;reiterates that while the EU has committed to investing in gender equality in agriculture, women farmers are not primary targets of agricultural ODA and calls on the EU and its Member States to allocate more resources to women farmers, in line with Objective 5 of the GAP II;
Amendment 135 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Strongly encourages the institutions to substantially improve the ratio of women Heads of Delegations, which is now 28 women out of 138 EU delegations, and the ratio of women Heads of Missions, which is now 5 out of 17;
Amendment 146 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. Calls for the establishment of a sanction system for EU delegations lacking commitment in the GAP implementation;
Amendment 149 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13 b. Notes that adequate funding on gender equality in external relations will be necessary to sustain political commitment to this goal;stresses that current funding for gender equality and women’s empowerment actions remain inadequate and urges to reverse this situation in the next MFF;
Amendment 150 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13 c. Strongly condemns the reinstatement and expansion of the Global Gag Rule and its impact on women’s and girls’ global health care and rights;reiterates its call on the EU, together with its Member States, to fill the financing gap left by the US in the area of sexual and reproductive health and rights, using EU development funding;
Amendment 164 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls the importance of using gender mainstreaming inobligation under the treaties to apply gender mainstreaming in all EU activities, including political dialogues and across sectorial policy dialogues;
Amendment 167 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Notes that gender mainstreaming training is taking place only in some delegations and that large parts of the staff trained had contractual status with temporary assignments;calls on the EU delegations to fix this situation;
Amendment 169 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the importance of conducting systematic gender analysis, using sex-disaggregated data, with the participation of local CSOs and women’s groups; welcomes that 42 country gender analyses have been completed and encourages rapid completion for all other countries; encourages the EU to explore possibilities for sharing and managing gender analysis in a more systematic manner to help improve coordination and a far higher use of gender equality criteria in programme and project monitoring systems and evaluation processes and for gender analysis to play a role in defining country strategy objectives, programmes, projects and dialogue; encourages the EU to explore possibilities for sharing and managing gender analysis in a more systematic manner to help improve coordination and not to limit gender analysis to obvious policy fields like education and maternal health, but to consider as well policy fields, which are currently wrongly considered to be gender neutral notably agriculture, climate or energy;
Amendment 198 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Encourages European Parliament delegations in their work with their partner countries to enquire systematically about gender programming and work on promoting gender equality as well as women’s empowerment and to include meetings with women organisations (women business organisations, organisations representing female workers, organisations defending human and women rights, etc.) in the mission programmes;
Amendment 206 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on the European Parliament to ensure a better gender-balanced composition of members taking part in its delegations;
Amendment 213 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Calls on the Commission to collect gender-disaggregated data in the implementation of EU financed programmes on women’s empowerment;
Amendment 215 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20 b. Recalls, however, that engendering data is more than collecting gender- disaggregated data and calls for the improvement of data collection in order to be able to make a qualitative analysis of women’s situation, for example, regarding working conditions;
Amendment 216 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20 c. Stresses the need to improve the reliability of the gender analysis by harmonising the data collected by EU delegations in a manner to make it comparable;
Amendment 217 #
2017/2012(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21 a. Points that international and national partners, academia, think tanks, and women’s organisations should not only be consulted but their input and expertise should also feed into the monitoring of EU financed activities and programmes on gender equality;
Amendment 24 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Citation 1
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 153(1)(b) and (2)(b) and article 157 thereof,
Amendment 29 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Since the adoption of Council Directive 91/533/EEC,33 labour markets have undergone far-reaching changes due to demographic developments and digitalisation leading to the creation of new forms of employment, which have supported job creation and labour market growth. New forms of employment are often not as regular or stable as traditional employment relationships and lead , among others, to reduced predictability for the workers concerned, creating uncertainty as to applicable rights and social protection, with clear gender effects as women tend to be over-represented in irregular, precarious and atypical forms of work. In this evolving world of work, there is therefore an increased need for workers to be not only fully informed about, but also better protected as regards of their essential working conditions, which should occur in a written form and in a timely manner. In order adequately to frame the development of new forms of employment, workers in the Union should also be provided with a number of new minimum rights aimed at promoting security and predictability in employment relationships while achieving upward convergence across Member States and preserving labour market adaptability. _________________ 33 Council Directive 91/533/EC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p. 32).
Amendment 33 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) Minimum requirements relating to information on the essential aspects of the employment relationship and relating to working conditions that apply to every worker should therefore be established at Union level in order to guarantee all workers in the Union an adequatregardless of their formal status in the Union the highest possible degree of transparency and predictability as regards their working conditions.
Amendment 35 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 39 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
Amendment 42 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Several different natural or legal persons may in practice assume the functions and responsibilities of an employer. Member States should remain free to determine more precisely the person(s) who are considered totally or partially responsible for the execution of the obligations that this Directive lays down for employers, as long as all those obligations are fulfilled. Member States should also be able to decide that some or all of these obligations are to be assigned to a natural or legal person who is not party to the employment relationship. Member States should be able to establish specific rules to exclude individuals acting as employers for domestic workers in the household from the obligations to consider and respond to a request for a different type of employment, to provide cost-free mandatory training, and from coverage of the redress mechanism based on favourable presumptions in the case of missing information in the written statementIf several natural and or legal persons are responsible as employer, they are jointly and severally liable.
Amendment 44 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Information on remuneration to be provided should include but not be limited to all elements of the remuneration, as well as the method of calculation and information on pay levels, broken down by gender, for categories of employees doing the same work or work of equal value, including contributions in cash or kind, directly or indirectly received by the worker in respect of his or her work overtime payments, bonuses and other entitlements, such as sick pay or leaves. The provision of such information should be without prejudice to the freedom for employers to provide for additional elements of remuneration such as one-off payments. The fact that elements of remuneration due by law or collective agreement have not been included in that information should not constitute a reason for not providing them to the worker.
Amendment 46 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14 a) Zero-hour and on-demand type of contracts should be prohibited. They are a danger to the worker and a damage to both society and employers respecting a level-playing field.
Amendment 47 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Workers should have the right to be informed about their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship in writing at the start of employment. The relevant information should therefore reach them at the latest onbefore the first day of the employment.
Amendment 50 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Probationary periods allow employers to verify thatif workers are suitable for the position for which they have been engaged while providing them with accompanying support and training. Such periods may be accompanied by reduced protection against dismissal. Any entry into the labour market or transition to a new position should not be subject to prolonged insecurity. As established in the European Pillar of Social Rights, probationary periods should therefore be of reasonable duration. A substantial number of Member States have established a general maximum duration of probation between three and six months, which should be considered reasonable. Probationary periods may be longer than six months where this is justified by the nature of the employment such as for managerial positions and where this is in the interest of the worker, such as in the case of long illness or in the context of specific measures promoting permanent employment notably for young workers, and therefore by no means be exceeded beyond.
Amendment 56 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Where employers are required by legislation or collective agreements to provide training to workers to carry out the work for which they are employed, it is important to ensure that such training is provided equally, and without discrimination, including to those in non- standard forms of employment. The costs of such training should not be charged to the worker nor withheld or deducted from the worker's remuneration. The training should take place during working hours.
Amendment 58 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27 a (new)
Recital 27 a (new)
(27 a) The Member States should ensure the elimination of all kind of discrimination with regard to all aspects of remuneration, respecting the principle of equal pay for equal work and work of equal value, and in the terms and conditions of employment, regardless of the contract type of the worker as defined by this Directive.
Amendment 65 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Directive lays down minimum rights that apply to every worker in the Union. These minimum rights apply to every person who is de facto a worker regardless of the formal status of the person.
Amendment 67 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Paragraph 2 is without prejudice to workers who are undergoing training including trainees and apprentices.
Amendment 70 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Amendment 77 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Amendment 80 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) ‘trainee’ means a worker who does a traineeship, this being a limited period of work practice which includes a learning and training component, in line with the Council Recommendation of 10 March 2014 on a Quality Framework for Traineeships.
Amendment 82 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall includeat least include, but not be limited to:
Amendment 84 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) the remuneration method of calculation and information on pay levels, broken down by gender, for categories of employees doing the same work or work of equal value;
Amendment 87 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point h
(h) the amount of paid leave and the different forms to take up the leave to which the worker is entitled or, where this cannot be indicated when the information is given, the procedures for allocating and determining such leave;
Amendment 90 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
(i a) all prerogatives and rights workers are entitled to, such as sickness, maternity and equivalent, parental, paternity, care, old-age, invalidity, survivors', unemployment, pre-retirement, pension or family benefits;
Amendment 92 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point j
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point j
(j) the initial basic amount, any other component elements indicated separately, such as payments of overtime, bonuses and other entitlements, such as sick pay, the frequency and method of payment of the remuneration to which the worker is entitled;
Amendment 97 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l – point ii a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point l – point ii a (new)
(ii a) the conditions and the level of financial compensation in case of cancellation of work by the employer.
Amendment 98 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point n a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point n a (new)
(n a) the mechanisms through which workers may lodge complaints, including information on specific mechanisms for complains on psychological and sexual harassment.
Amendment 100 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The information referred to in Article 3(2) shall be provided individually to the worker in the form of a document at the latest ons early as possible but at the latest at the commencement the first day of the employment relationship. That document may be provided and transmitted electronically as long as it is easily accessible by the worker and can be stored and printed.
Amendment 105 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) where applicable the changes to the worker’s social security situation
Amendment 107 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Article 6 – paragraph 4
Amendment 111 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may provide for longerA probationary periods in cases where this is justified by the nature of the employment or is in the inter shall not hamper the accrual of rights and can only be agreed in casest of the workeropen-ended contracts.
Amendment 117 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall ensure that the open- ended contract remains the norm.
Amendment 118 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Zero-hour or on-demand type of contracts are prohibited
Amendment 120 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The worker remains entitled to its remuneration, as if he/she would have been working and the training shall take place during working hours
Amendment 121 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11 a Equal treatment and non discrimination The Member States shall ensure the principle of equal pay for equal work and work of equal value and put in place measures that ensure that employers in undertakings and organisations regularly inform of the average remuneration by category of employee or position, broken down by gender. The Member States shall ensure the elimination of all forms of discrimination with regard to all aspects and conditions of remuneration, equal treatment and opportunities in accessing and in the terms and conditions of employment, regardless of their employment status.
Amendment 130 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Member States shall introduce measures necessary to protect all workers regardless of their legal or formal status, including workers who are employees' and trade union representatives, from any adverse treatment by the employer or adverse consequences resulting from a complaint lodged with the employer or from any legal proceedings initiated with the aim of enforcing compliance with the rights provided for in this Directive.
Amendment 131 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Member States shall introduce measures to prevent psychological and sexual harassment at the work place through policies which set out prevention measures, effective, transparent and confidential procedures to deal with complaints, sanctions for perpetrators, information and trainings for workers and employers and support to companies to draw up actions plans to implement all the measures thereof.
Amendment 138 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a Facilitation of Complains Member States shall ensure that there are effective mechanisms through which workers may lodge complaints against their employers, directly or through third parties designated by Member States such as trade unions or other associations or a competent authority of the Member State when provided for by national legislation. Member States shall ensure specific and confidential procedures to deal with complaints on psychological and sexual harassment.
Amendment 142 #
2017/0355(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 a (new)
Article 21 a (new)
Article 21 a Inspections Member States shall ensure that effective and adequate inspections are carried out to control the rights laid down in this Directive.
Amendment 4 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
Citation 6
– having regard to the Preparatory Action for Culture in External Relations1 and its recommendations1, __________________ 1 http://ec.europa.eu/culture/library/publicati ons/global-cultural-citizenship_en.pdf
Amendment 19 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU is abecoming a more prominent actor in international politics playing an ever-increasing role in world affairs, including through an enhanced capacity of promoting culture in international relationsrelations and should put additional resources and energy into the promotion of its common culture, cultural heritage, artistic creation and innovation within regional diversity, based on Art. 167 of the TFEU;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas culture has an intrinsic value,the EU experience has shown that cultural exchanges can serves as a powerful bridge between people of different ethnic, religious and social backgrounds, reinforces intercultural and interreligious dialogue and mutual understanding, and should therefore be part of EU foreign policy;
Amendment 32 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas in order for the EU to foster intercultural understanding, it will have to expand on common communication tools in form of genuinely European media such as for example Arte, Euronews or Euranet;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the EU and its Member States have common cultural roots and heritage and are united therefore in their diversity; whereas European cultures and cultural heritage represents the diversity of European societies and regions, their majority societies as much as minority and migrant cultures;
Amendment 47 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas in EU history, cultural relations arehave been fundamental drivers of social cohesion and sustainable economic and human development, while playing a crucial role in strengthening civil society capacities, reinforcing democratisation processes and in conflict prevention and resilience;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the joint communication on ‘'Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations’' provides a framework for the EU’'s international cultural relations; whereas, however, it falls short of it renounces to identifying thematic and geographical priorities, concrete objectives and outcomes, target groups, common, target groups, it clarifies financial opportunities of the EU programs, and intserests and initiatives, financing provisions and implementation modalities common goal as to education and the relevance of inter- cultural exchanges of young people, students, researchers, and of European Voluntary Service;
Amendment 59 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas people to people contacts such as youth exchanges, city twinning, and partnerships in the professional field, have been important vehicles to foster intercultural understanding and should be promoted by the EU in its foreign policy relations;
Amendment 61 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas establishing a visa policy going along with the mobility of researchers, students and staff to and from third countries and alumni networks of former participants in EU programmes17 are a key part ofis essential to the EU’'s international cultural relations; __________________ 17 For instance, Erasmus and Horizon 2020.
Amendment 69 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas a visa policy for artists and cultural professionals is key to a successful cooperation and a free circulation of works, through European and international networks, as well as ensuring vivid artists' residencies programmes involving civil society in the different countries and regions of the world;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for artistic freedom of expression to be promoted as a value and an endeavour of the European Union, fostering free dialogue and exchange of good practices at international level;
Amendment 99 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises that while the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality shouldhave to be respected in the field of culture, the benefit of exchanges and creating the habit to work and create together has built up respect and understanding of other cultures;
Amendment 108 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the mutual advantages of working together: the EU is an arena in which all Member States join forces to play a stronger role in the field of international cultural relations; suggests that each Member State’s rotating presidency could launch joint actions together with the EU, such as exhibitions, particularly for smaller states osimilar to the Europalia, the EU delegations and the Member States embassies could highlight every 2nd year a different EU country and launch joint actions around its particular culture all over those with no cultural representations abroaorld;
Amendment 122 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. ReWelcommends that international cultural relations be embedded in the cultural and creative sectors (CCS), thus reinforcing and promoting the role of professionals, including through regional creative hubs and clusterthe Joint Communication introduces cultural and creative industries as an important element of the EU's strategy for international cultural relations, especially with regards to regional creative hubs and clusters, as well as skills development for young creative professionals;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Urges the Commission, in the next multiannual financial framework, to provide for a budget line dedicated to supportingppropriate and decent funding for international cultural relations in existing programmes and future calls, especially in the next generation of programmes on culture and education, so that these can develop their international action in a proper way;
Amendment 142 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Proposes that a dedicatedstronger line in the next generation of EU programme for culture be designed and resources focusdeveloped on international mobility and exchanges such as, based on the present experience with residency programmes especially for young cultural and creative professionals and artists;
Amendment 155 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Underlines that for reasons of sustainability the EU's external cultural funding activities must result from a strong involvement of local partners, adaptation of programmes to local realities and a due consideration of the post-funding period for projects including transition to national financing or other revenue-models;
Amendment 161 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to include culture in all existing and future bilateral and multilateral cooperation; and trade agreements with adequate budgets and with due respect to the commitments made under the UNESCO Convention on Cultural Diversity, taking into account the economic potential of cultural heritage and CCS for a sustainable growth and jobsdevelopment; calls for EU indicators to be developed in that field;
Amendment 179 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to appoint a ‘focal point’ in each EU delegation to liaise with Member States’ national cultural institutes, representatives and local civil society, actors and authorities in a collaborative approach aimed at identifying priority areas, needs and methods of cooperation, and to provide an adequate budget; asks the Commission and the EEAS to report annually to the European Parliament on state of implementation and achieved results;
Amendment 182 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to appoint a ‘'focal point’' in each EU delegation to liaise with Member States’' national cultural institutes, representatives and local civil society, actors and authorities in a collaborative approachstructured dialogue process aimed at jointly identifying common priority areas, needs and methods of cooperation, and to provide an adequate budget;
Amendment 204 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the establishment of the Cultural Diplomacy Platform, and calls for it to be made sustainable; and asks for its further expansion to include a one-stop- shop for potential beneficiaries of EU funding programmes in this area, a platform for exchange of best practices and networking amongst practitioners and an expansion of current training offers to a wider audience; and recogniszes that many different institutional and non- institutional stakeholders19 are active in the area of international cultural relations, and asks the Commission to promote a structured dialogue among all stakeholders, including through the open method of coordination; __________________ 19 Commission Directorates-General (notably for Education and Culture (EAC), International Cooperation and Development (DEVCO), Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations (NEAR), Research and Innovation (RTD) and Communications Networks, Content and Technology (CONNECT), the EEAS, the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments (FPI), EU delegations, Member State delegations, Member States’ cultural institutes abroad, the Council of Europe, the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions, EUNIC, the International Council of Museums (ICOM), the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM), UNESCO, international organisations, civil society organisations, non-governmental organisations, local cultural actors, street artists and other platforms and networks.
Amendment 228 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Recognises young people, as future decision-makers, tothat the exposure to other cultures and languages fall on particularly fruitful ground at a young age, while offering experiences which often create a livelong affinity and underlines that the youth should be one of the main target groups in the EU and partner countries, and acknowledges that music, film, li in the context of EU internature, social media and digital trends in geneional cultural are the best channels to reach themlations;
Amendment 233 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Underlines the great value of the Erasmus+ program; believes that it would be the single most efficient instrument of EU international cultural relations if it could be enhanced through much increased funding and staff, notably for the youth exchange program with third countries;
Amendment 238 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25b. Notes in this context the proposal for a European Solidarity Corps, which could be a very welcome enlargement of existing programs like the European Voluntary Service, if it is designed as not to divert funding and personnel from those successful activities; believes that the inclusion of at least the neighbourhood countries in this future program could create intercultural synergies comparable to Erasmus inside the EU in the past;
Amendment 239 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 c (new)
Paragraph 25 c (new)
25c. Welcomes initiatives by the Commission to promote peer-to-peer learning for young cultural entrepreneurs like the Medculture programme or to support initiatives like training to intercultural relations like More Europe;
Amendment 241 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Advocates allowing third countries to participate as easily as possible in cross- border and joint projects20 such as the European Capital of Culture, Lux Prize or the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe, as well as including them as players in the future strategy; suggests for the EU delegations in third countries to take full advantage of EU cultural activities such as the Lux Price for their work in third countries; recalls that digital tools, technological platforms such as Europeana and cultural networks21 can play a crucial role in reaching larger audiences and disseminating best practices; __________________ 20 The EU delegations should play a greater role by working with local artists and civil society actors, focus their efforts, involve more local artists and serve as key contact points in order to create synergies with EU projects. 21 For example, the Cultural Innovators Network and the Cultural Leaders Network.
Amendment 243 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Advocates allowing third countries to participate as easily as possible in cross- border and joint projects20 such as the European Capital of Culture, Lux Prize or the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe, as well as including them as players in the future strategy; recalls that digital tools, technological platforms such as Europeana and cultural networks21 can play a crucial role in reaching larger audiences and disseminating best practices; __________________ 20 The EU delegations should play a greater role by working with local artists and civil society actors, focus their efforts, involve more local artists and serve as key contact points in order to create synergies with EU projects. 21 For example, the Cultural Innovators Network and the Cultural Leaders Network.
Amendment 244 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Calls for the creation of a Cultural Visa Programme, along the lines of the existing Scientific Visa Programme, for third-country nationals, artists and other professionals in the cultural field with the aim of fostering cultural relations and eliminating obstacles to mobility in the cultural sector;
Amendment 263 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Calls for a paradigm shift in media coverage with the launch of an EU cultural portal, the European Houses of Culture and festivals, including through engagement with local media and through structured engagement with local media and social media platforms24 ; __________________ 24 In cooperation with EURONEWS and EURANET, among others.
Amendment 264 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Stresses the need to further clarify the concept of European Culture Houses and their potential role in the EU's international cultural relations and expresses its willingness to further specify such a concept in the context of an EU pilot project;
Amendment 273 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Amendment 5 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of the large investment gap in Europe, which the Commission estimates at a minimum of EUR 200-300 billion a year; , highlights in particular, against this backdrop, the marketpublic needs in Europe for high-risk financing, for instance in the fields of R&D, energy and ICTparticularly in the fields of the strategic areas transport, communications and energy infrastructure, necessary to sustain inclusive economic development based on independence from the physical and political risks of fossil fuels; is concerned by the fact that the most recent data on national accounts do not indicate any surge in investment since the Investment Plan for Europe, including the CMU and European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), was launched, leading to risks ofconcerns that, without a change in focus, there will be continued subdued growth and continuing high unemployment rates; stresses that closing this investment gap by creating an environment conducive to investment in certain strategic areas is key to reviving growth, fighting unemployment and attaining long-term EU policy objectives;
Amendment 30 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that EFSI was launched to help resolve difficulties and remove obstacles to financing as well as to implement strategic, transformative and productive investments that provide a high level of added value to the economy, the environment and societysociety through improving the economy and mitigating environmental threats;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Regrets the low levels of investment with regard to social infrastructure, environmental infrastructure and energy efficiency, and calls for concerted efforts to boost investment in respect thereof;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Recalls that the COP 21 climate agreement requires a major shift in investment towards energy efficiency, renewable energy and sustainable modes of transport, and a swift phasing out of investment in fossil fuel investment and modes of transport. Stresses that the eligibility criteria for EFSI need to be fully coherent with the COP 21 agreement;
Amendment 41 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls the role of Parliament as foreseen in the regulation, in particular in relation to the monitoring of EFSI implementation; acknowledges, however, that it is too early to finalise a comprehensive assessment of the functioning of EFSI and its impact on the EU economy, but is of the opinion that a preliminary evaluation based on comprehensive data on the projects selected and rejected and the related decisions is crucial in order to identify possible areas of improvement for EFSI 2.0 and thereafter;
Amendment 53 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the purpose of EFSI is to ensure additionality by helping to address market failures or suboptimal investment situations and supporting operations which could not have been carried out under existing Union financial instruments and would not have been funded from private sources without the involvement of EFSI;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the projects supported by EFSI, while striving to create employment, sustainable growth, economic, territorial and social cohesion, are considered to provide additionality if they carry a risk corresponding to EIB special activities, as defined in Article 16 of the EIB Statute and by the credit risk policy guidelines of the EIB; underlines that EIB projects carrying a risk lower than the minimum risk under EIB special activities may also be supported by EFSI only if use of the EU guarantee is required to ensure additionalityconsiders that projects carrying a risk corresponding to EIB special activities may be a desirable feature but is in practice too simplistic a criterion for the assessment of additionality as it is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for ensuring that resulting investments are of a kind that would not have been made without EFSI; underlines that EIB projects carrying a risk lower than the minimum risk under EIB special activities may also be supported by EFSI only if they are strategic in nature and the use of the EU guarantee is necessary to ensure an adequate amount of financing from other public or private sources; further underlines that the mere fact that a project carries a risk corresponding to EIB special activities are not necessarily strategic;
Amendment 80 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that, while all projects approved under EFSI are presented as ‘special activities’, an independent evaluation has found that some projects could have been financed otherwiswithout the use of the EU guarantee;
Amendment 90 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the EIB, to draw up an inventory of all EU-backed EIB financing falling under the additionality criteria and to provide clear and comprehensive explanations of the evidence that they could not have been achieved through other means;
Amendment 119 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Strongly recommends that the revised scoreboard be made available to applicants for EFSI financing in order to incentivise the design of projects to maximise the scores;
Amendment 121 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers that the criteria according to which projects and eligible counterparts are assessed are unclear and lack transparency; requests further information from the EFSI governing bodies on the evaluations carried out on all projects approved under EFSI accordingly, in particular as regards their additionality and contribution to growth and job creation as defined in the Regulation; As regards eligible counterparts, regrets that scandal- ridden financial undertakings such as Bankia have been chosen, and calls for strict rules on corporate governance for these type of entities to become acceptable EFSI partners;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that the scoreboard is supposed to be used by the Investment Committee (IC) to ensure an independent and transparent assessment of the potential and actual use of the EU guarantee and to prioritise projects; requestsgrets that this is not in fact done as the IC has chosen to assess each project individually and not in relation to other potential investments in violation of basic optimal investment principles; insists that this non- conformity with EU law be rectified immediately and that the project selection criteria be properly applied and this process be made more transparent; recalls that according to the Annex to the current Regulation the IC must assign equal importance to each pillar of the scoreboard when prioritising projects, irrespective of whether the individual pillar yields a numerical score, or whether it is composed of unscored qualitative and quantitative indicators; regrets that Pillar 3 relevant to technical aspects of the projects are in the current scoreboard given the same weight as Pillars 1 and 2 which relate to the more important desired outcomes and that “promoter capabilities”, another technical aspect, is inexplicably placed in Pillar 2 rather than Pillar 3; criticises the fact that the EIB itself admits that the IC’s experts only make use of the 4th pillar for information purposes, not for decision- making; requests that scoreboards, with the exclusion of commercially sensitive information, are made public after the endorsement of the respective projects, including the scoreboard for rejected projects of material size and a summary scoreboard for the entire portfolio;
Amendment 143 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls for the Scoreboard to be redesigned to give much more weight to final outcomes, such as quality jobs and public infrastructure conducive to long- term sustainable economic development and much less weight to intermediate goals such as the ratio of private to public funds deployed or technical aspects of delivery;
Amendment 150 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges that it may take some years to prepare new innovative and strategic projects, that the EIB is regrettably under pressure to achieve the EUR 315 billion goalsimplistic and purely quantitative EUR 315 billion goal rather than seek the best way to address output and employment gaps and therefore had no option but to launch EFSI activities immediatehastily, is concerned, however, that the EIB, when implementing EFSI, has consequently thus far drawn on its existing project pipeline with lower risk projects to a large extent, thereby reducing its own conventional financing; fears that EFSI does not provide complementary financing for high-risk innovative and strategic projects; underlines that even though a project qualifies as a special activity, this does not necessarily imply that it is risky, however the classification as a special activity might also stem from the fact that its financing has been structured in an artificially risky fashion, implying that very low-risk projects can also easily end up as high-risk projects;
Amendment 164 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Considers it important to discuss whether the envisaged leverage of 15 is appropriate to enable EFSI to support high quality projects bearing a higher risk; invites the EIB to weigh up complemensubordinating the volume requirement with secondary goals to be achievedprimary goals to be achieved related to closing output and unemployment gaps; Notes also that the methodology used to calculate the leverage or multiplier effect risks overstating the actual impact of the use of EU funds, particularly for the investment projects to which investors had already committed or which were part of national programmes that were in place or planned even before EFSI was launched; welcomes the Court of Auditors suggestion to align the ‘EFSI Multiplier Methodology’ with the relevant methodology suggested by the OECD;
Amendment 229 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Recalls that the IC experts are responsible for EFSI project selection, granting the EU guarantee and for approving operations with investment platforms and National Promotional Banks (NPBs) or institutions; recalls further that they are independent; considers that project selection is not transparent enough and that decisions have to be accounted for; stresses that the EIB should make improvements to the disclosure of information about the projects it approves under EFSI, with a proper justification of additionality and the scoreboard with a particular emphasis on the expected impact of EFSI operations, in aggregate and separately for large projects or programs, on the employment and output gaps in the Union; is concerned about documented conflicts of interest on the part of IC members;
Amendment 241 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. As regards the EP internal organisation and in the light of the EIB’s growing tasks and responsibilities, urges the Conference of Presidents to make a proposal for a single committee approach, with view to ensuring a permanently high level of accountability of the EIB towards the EP and civil society.
Amendment 244 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls that as a result of their know-how, NPBs are necessary for the success of EFSI, as they are close to the local markets; finds that synergies have so far not been exploited to the requisite extent ; observes a risk of local institutions being crowded out by the EIB; recognises that EFSI and the EIB are increasingly willing to take more junior/subordinated tranches with the NPBs and urges them to continue to do so; invites the EIB to discuss whether it would be useful to incorporate NPB expertise into the SB; Encourages NPBs to enter into collaboration agreements with the EIF to foster exchange of expertise and market knowledge.
Amendment 251 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls that diversified investments with a geographical or thematic focus should be made possible by helping to finance and bundle projects and funds from different sources; notes that the first investment platform was only set up in the third quarter of 2016; highlights the need to simplify the rules for establishing investment platforms; encourages the Commission to enlarge its investment platform approach as developed with regard to the circular economy to other EU priority sectors;
Amendment 277 #
2016/2064(INI)
28. Welcomes that by the end of 2016, all 28 countries received EFSI funding; underlines, however, that as of 30 June 2016, EU-15 had received 91% whereas EU-13 had only received 9% of EFSI support; regrets that EFSI support has mainly benefitted a limited number of countries where the employment and output gaps are already below the EU average;
Amendment 285 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Acknowledges that GDP and the number of projects approved are linked; recognises that larger Member States are able to take advantage of more developed capital markets and are therefore more likely to benefit from a market-driven instrument such as EFSI but insists that the EFSI was set up to address market failures in investment areas necessary to close output and employment gaps and not to take advantage of market success; underlines that lower EFSI support in EU- 13 may be attributable to other factors, such as the small size of projects, and competition from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF); observes with concern, however, the disproportionate benefit to certain countries and underlines the need to diversify geographical distribution further, especially in crucial sectors such asstrategic areas related to the modernising and improving the productivity and sustainability of economies;
Amendment 315 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Recalls that the Union provides an irrevocable and unconditional guarantee to the EIB for financing and investment operations under EFSI; is convinced that the EU Guarantee has enabled the EIB to take on higher risk for the Infrastructure and Investment Window (IIW) and has permitted the financing of SMEs, Midcaps under COSME and InnovFin forsupported by the SME Window (SMEW) to be enhanced and frontloaded; believes that the current threshold of € 25 Million should be lowered to improve access of SMEs to EFSI;
Amendment 320 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
41. Stresses that, due to a very strong uptake reflecting the high market demand,making use of a pre- existing pipeline of funding requests for the COSME Loan Guarantee Facility (LGF) and the InnovFin – Horizon 2020 SME Guarantee (SMEG) facility the SME Window was further reinforced by EUR 500 million from the IIW Debt Portfolio under the existing legislative framework; welcomes that, due to the flexibility of the EFSI Regulation, the additional financing was granted to benefit SMEs and small mid-caps; intends to monitor closely the allocation of the guarantee under the two windows;
Amendment 341 #
2016/2064(INI)
45. NIs concerned about the complementarity between EFSI and ESIF and notes that awareness of overlaps and competition between EFSI and financial instruments of the EU budget on the part of the Commission and the EIB has led to the adoption of guidelines recommending the combination of EFSI and ESI financing; points, however, to persistent differences in the eligibility criteria, regulations, timeframe for reporting and the application of state aid rules, which hinder combined usage; believes that given the required assessments, the ERDF’s public procurement and innovation projects participation in EFSI should be automatic; welcomes the fact that the Commission has begun to address these in its proposal for a revision of the Financial Regulation; believes that further efforts are required and that the second and third pillars of the investment plan are key to this end;
Amendment 350 #
2016/2064(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Is concerned about the Commission proposal requiring the highest risk-taking tranche of the investment to be covered by ESI Funds instead of EFSI when the instruments are combined; Believes that this leads to legal uncertainty in the use of ESI Funds, and runs counter to the initial EFSI rationale to provide for new risk-bearing capacity for EU investment;
Amendment 7 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) It is necessary to increase the effectiveness of the European system to return illegally staying third-country nationals. This is essential for maintaining public trust in the Union migration and asylum policy and providing support to persons in need of international protection.
Amendment 10 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Member States should take all necessary measures to return illegally staying third-country nationals in an effective and proportionate manner, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2008/115/EC and with full respect of fundamental rights and in particular the principle of non-refoulement.
Amendment 62 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Amendment 63 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) whether the person concerned is armed, violent, has escaped or is involved in an activity as referred to in Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism;
Amendment 66 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
An alert may not be entered without the data referred to in (a),(g),(k),(m),(n),(w) and (wx). When available, all other data listed above shall also be entered.
Amendment 69 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e
Amendment 75 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be immediately deleted when the decision upon which the alert was based has been withdrawn or annulled by the competent authority. Alerts on return shall also be deleted when the third-country national concerned can demonstrate that they have left the territory of the Member States in compliance with a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC.
Amendment 81 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information pursuant to this Regulation may be transferred or made available to a third-country in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 with the authorisation of the issuing Member State, only for the purpose of identification of and issuance of an identification or travel document to an illegally staying-third country national in view of return and with full respect of the principle of non-refoulement.
Amendment 82 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Prior to any transfer of information to a third country, the competent authorities must confirm that the life and freedom of a returnee will not be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.
Amendment 83 #
2016/0407(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new)
(1) Data related to any previous asylum application or immigration status of the returnee in territory of the Member States shall not be transferred to a third country for the purpose of this Regulation.
Amendment 57 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital -1 (new)
Recital -1 (new)
(-1) The primary aim of EFSI should be to support otherwise unfundable projects that provide European citizen with long-term environmental and societal benefits such as high quality long-term jobs and public infrastructure. It is therefore much more important to identify and support projects that provide this genuine additionality and quality rather than being driven by technical aspects such as leverage factors or project speed and volumes.
Amendment 84 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The EFSI, implemented and co- sponsored by the EIB Group, is firmly on track to deliver the objective of mobilising at least EUR 315 billion in additional investments in the real economy by mid- 2018. The market absorption has been particularly quick under the SME Window where the EFSI is delivering well beyond expectations. In July 2016 the SME Window was thus scaled-up by EUR 500 million within the existing parameters of Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017. A larger share of financing to be geared towards SMEs given the exceptional market demand for SME financing under the EFSI: 40% of the increased risk bearing capacity of the EFSI should be geared towards increasing access to financing for SMEs. Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017 should be revised so as to enable the EFSI to focus its efforts on sustainable investments allowing the EU honouring its COP21 commitments. With this in mind, a larger share of financing is also to be geared towards climate relevant projects of SMEs.
Amendment 93 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) The EFSI was established for an initial period of three years and with the aim of mobilising at least EUR 315 billion in investments. Given its success, the Commission is committed to the doubling of the EFSI, both in terms of duration and financial capacity. The legal extension covers the period of the current Multiannual Financial Framework and should provide a total of at least half a trillion euro investments by 2020. In order to enhance the firepower of On 11 November 2016, the European Court of Auditors concluded that it was still too soon for the economic, social and environmental impacts to be measured or for a conclusion to be drawn as to whether EFSI even further and reach the aim of doubling the investment target, Member States should also contribute as a matter of prioritywas achieving its objectives. A comprehensive impact assessment should provide for the necessary evidence whether or not to extend EFSI.
Amendment 111 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) The extended EFSI should address remaining market failures and sub-optimal investment situations and continue to mobilise private sector financing in investments crucial for Europe’'s future job creation – including for the youth –, growth and competitiveness with strengthened additionality. They include investments in the areas of energy, environment and climate action, social and human capital and related infrastructure, healthcare, research and innovation, cross- border and sustainable transport, as well as the digital transformation. In particular, the contribution of operations supported by the EFSI to achieving the Union's ambitious targets set at the Paris Climate Conference (COP21) should be reinforced. Energlectricity interconnection priority projects and energy efficiency projects should also be increasingly targeted. In addition, EFSI support to motorways should be avoided, unless it is needed to support private investment in transport in cohesion countries or in cross-border transport projects involving at least one cohesion country. For reasons of clariexcept for cross-border sections as defined in transport in Article 2 (2) of regulation 1316/2013 between cohesion countries. It should be explicitly laid down that projects in the fields of agriculture, fishery and aquaculture are not eligible for EFSI support. EFSI support for fossil fuel projects, especially infrastructure and nuclear installations should be avoided. Given the very high rates of poverty, although they are already eligible, it should be explicitly laid down that projects in the fields of agriculture, fishery and aquaculturend social exclusion in Europe, the operations supported by the EFSI to tackling this issue should be reinforced. Further given the significant need for investment into social infrastructure, projects in the fields of social services, healthcare services, education and social housing come within the general objectives eligible for EFSI support.
Amendment 130 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Additionality, a key feature of the EFSI, should be strengthened in the selection of projects. In particular, operations should only be eligible for EFSI support if they address clearly identified market failures or sub-optimal investment situations. Operations in infrastructure under the Infrastructure and Innovation Window linking two or more Member Stre strategic, generating long-term societal and environmental benefits in key areas of EU policy, and would not otherwise be funded. The Investment Committee should ensure that additionality is verified in its selection procedure. The EFSI should operates, in cluding e-infrastructure, should be considered additional given oser conjunction with the Structural Funds and otheir inherent difficulty and their high added value for the UnionEU cohesion policy funds. EFSI should not, however, in any way substitute the EU's cohesion policy.
Amendment 144 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9 a) The EFSI should neither contradict the achievements of the European Social Fund (ESF), the EU's cohesion policy, especially the achievements of the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), nor contradict the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy.
Amendment 155 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
Recital 10 a (new)
(10 a) With a view to contributing to the Union objective of economic, social, and territorial cohesion and reducing regional disparities, the geographic balance of EFSI support needs urgently be enhanced by providing for effective implementation of geographic diversification and by strengthening the role of the European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH), including the creation of decentralised regional clusters of technical assistance.
Amendment 157 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
Amendment 195 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In line with the exceptional market demand for SME financing under the EFSI which is expected to continue, the EFSI SME Window should be enhanced. Particular attention should be paid to social enterprises and social services, including through the development and deployment of new instruments, adequate for the sector's needs and specificities.
Amendment 209 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) With a view to enhancing the transparency of EFSI operations, the Investment Committee should explain in its decisions, which are made public and accessible, the reasons why it deems that an operation should be granted the EU guarantee, with particular focus on compliance with the additionality criterion. The scoreboard of indicators should be made public once an operation under the EU guarantee is signedapproved. The Investment Committee should provide the scoreboard of indicators of the operations rejected to the Parliament, with the exclusion of commercially sensitive information.
Amendment 217 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The operations supported by the EFSI should adhere to the Union's principles of tax good governance and its social acquis.
Amendment 223 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH) should be enhanced through increased accessibility and transparency, and its activities should focus on needs not covered adequately under current arrangements. It should pay particular attention to supporting the preparation of projects providing genuine additionality, involving two or more Member States and projects that contribute to achieving the objectives of COP21, and the Europe 2020 strategy, including tackling poverty and social exclusion. Notwithstanding its objective to build upon existing advisory services of the EIB and the Commission, so to act as a single technical advisory hub for project financing within the Union, the EIAH should also contribute actively to the objective of sectorial and geographical diversification of the EFSI and support the EIB where needed in originating projectsand eventually aggregating projects., for example in the area of energy efficiency. It should also actively contribute to the establishment of investment platforms, including sectorial ones and provide advice on the combination of other sources of Union funding with the EFSI, as well as informing about the respective eligibility criteria to be respected by these funds. An extension of guidance on how to create an investment platform, the different forms it can adopt, theoretical models of operation without any prejudice to keep the necessary flexibility would be appropriate.
Amendment 235 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21 a (new)
Recital 21 a (new)
(21 a) The European Fund for Strategic Investments should be enhanced through the inclusion of a gender perspective as a successful process of recovery is not possible without addressing the impact of the crises on women1a. _________________ 1aEP INI on poverty: a gender perspective, 2015/2228(INI); EP INI on EU funds for gender equality 2016/2144(INI)
Amendment 254 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph -1 (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 2 – point 8 a (new)
Article 2 – point 8 a (new)
(-1) in Article 2 the following point is added: ‘(8a) Strategic operation' means an investment project or program that has as its primary aim the realisation of infrastructure, physical capital, goods or services that contribute to social and environmental policy objectives of the European Union or to the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development;’;
Amendment 262 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
(2) in Article 5(1) the third subparagraph is replaced by the following: 'To better address market failures or sub- optimal investment situFor the purposes of this Regulations, EIB special activities'additionality' means the supported by the EFSI shall typically have features such as subordination, participation in risk- sharing instruments, cross-borderof strategic operations which address employment and output gaps and which could not have been characteristics, exposure to specific risks or other identifiable aspects as further described in Annex II. EIB projects carrying a risk lower than the minimum risk under EIB special activities may also be supported by the EFSI if the use of the EU guarantee is requiried out in the period during which the EU guarantee can be used, or not to the same extent, by the EIB, the EIF or under existing Union financial instruments without EFSI support. The Investment Committee shall ensured to ensurehat additionality ais deverifined in the first subparagraph of this paragraph. The projects supported by the EFSI that consist of physical infrastructure linking two or more Member States or of the extension of physical infrastructure or services linked to physical infrastructure from one Member State to one or more Member States, shall also be considered to provide additionalityselection procedure and that the reasons for the assessment that an operation meets the additionality criterion are fully documented as part of that procedure.';
Amendment 290 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
2015/1017
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 297 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The EFSI Agreement shall provide that the EFSI is to support projects which address market failures or sub-optimal investment situoperations and which:;
Amendment 299 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(3 a) are economically viablein Article 6(1), point (a) is replaced by the following: ‘(a) provide a remuneration for the public contributors to the EFSI that is commensurate with their aggregate cost of funds according to a cost- benefit analysis following Union standards, taking into account possible support from, and co- financing by, private and public partners to a project;’;
Amendment 301 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 6 – Paragraph 1 – Point b
Article 6 – Paragraph 1 – Point b
(3 b) are consistent with Union policies, including the objective of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, quality job creation, and economic, social and territorial cohesionin Article 6(1), point (b) is replaced by the following: ‘(b) are strategic operations;’;
Amendment 302 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 6 – Paragraph 1 – Point d
Article 6 – Paragraph 1 – Point d
(d) mobilisation of private sector capital; and3 c) Article 6 (1), point (d) is deleted. maximise where possible the
Amendment 319 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point - i (new) Regulation (EU) No
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point - i (new) Regulation (EU) No
2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point d
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point d
(-i) point (d) is replaced by the following: ‘(d) information and communication technologies infrastructures;, such as energy efficient block chain technologies to create economic incentives for environmentally responsible behaviour;’
Amendment 322 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point i b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point i b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point k
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – point k
(i b) point (k) is replaced by the following: ‘(k) social infrastructures, social services and the social and solidarity economy.;’
Amendment 330 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point dRegulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point dRegulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 12 – subparagraph 2 – second sentence
‘Decisions approving the use of the EU guarantee shall be publicshed and accessible through detailed minutes, and include the rationale for the decision, with particular focus on compliance with the additionality criterion. The publication shall not contain commercially sensitive information. In reaching its decision, the Investment Committee shall be supported by the documentation provided by the EIB.’; Scoreboard referred to in paragraph 14 shall function as a means for prioritising investment in order to maximise the aggregate score over the EFSI portfolio and shall be publicly available after the evaluation of projects applying for the use of the EU guarantee. The publication shall not contain commercially sensitive information. In reaching its decision, the Investment Committee shall be supported by the documentation provided by the EIB. The EIB shall submit twice a year to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a list of all decisions of the Investment Committee rejecting the use of the EU guarantee as well as subject to strict confidentiality requirements.’
Amendment 337 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point d a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point d a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 7 – paragraph 14
Article 7 – paragraph 14
(d a) article 7 para 14 is replaced by the following: ‘14. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 23(1) to (3) and (5) to supplement this Regulation by establishing a scoreboard of indicators to be used by the Investment Committee to ensure an independent and transparent assessment of the potential and actual use of the EU guarantee. The scoreboard shall consist of 3 pillars: - a "Strategic Targeting" pillar which shall include indicators assessing the degree to which a proposed operation qualifies as "additional" as defined in this regulation as well as the degree to which the proposed operation contributes to the general objectives set out in Article 9 - a "Citizens' Impact" pillar which shall include indicators such as long term job creation and gross value added, weighted by the unemployment and output gaps applicable in the geographical areas concerned and distinguishing between direct and indirect effects - a "Technical Execution" pillar which shall include indicators relating to the efficiency of the investment process such as the ratio of public to private commitments, the quality and capabilities of promoters, intermediaries and platforms. The scores under each pillar shall be combined as a weighted sum where the "targeting" and "overall impact" pillar scores are equally weighted and the "technical" pillar score receives a weight of no more than half of that applied to the other pillars. Such delegated acts shall be prepared in close dialogue with the EIB.
Amendment 339 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point - a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point - a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
(-a) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘The EU guarantee shall be granted for EIB financing and investment operations approved by the Investment Committee referred to in Article 7(7) or for funding or guarantees to the EIF in order to conduct EIB financing and investment operations in accordance with Article 11(3). The operations concerned shall be consistent with Union policies andstrategic operations and shall directly support any of the following general objectives: (a) research, development and innovation, in particular through: (i) projects that are in line with Horizon 2020; (ii) research infrastructures; (iii) demonstration projects and programmes as well as deployment of related infrastructures, technologies and processes; (iv) support to academia including collaboration with industry; (v) knowledge and technology transfer; (b) development of the energy sector in accordance with the Energy Union priorities, including security of energy supply, and the 2020, 2030 and 2050 climate and energy frameworks, in particular through: (i) expansion of the use or supply of renewable energy; (ii) energy efficiency and energy savings (with a focus on reducing demand through demand- side management and the refurbishment of buildings); (iii) development and modernisation of energy infrastructure (in particular interconnections, smart grids at distribution level, energy storage and synchronisation of networks); (c) development of transport infrastructures, and equipment and innovative technologies for transport, in particularcluding small scale projects, that are listed in the individual member states' Transport Master Plans, through: (i) projects and horizontal priorities eligible under Regulations (EU) No 1315/2013 and (EU) No 1316/2013; (ii) smart and sustainable urban mobility projects (targeting accessibility, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and accidents); (iii) projects connecting nodes to TEN- T infrastructures; (d) financial support through the EIF and the EIB to entities having up to 3 000 employees, with a particular focus on SMEs and small mid- cap companies, in particular through: (i) provision of working capital and investment; (ii) provision of risk financing from seed to expansion stages for SMEs, start- ups, small mid- cap companies and mid- cap companies, to ensure technological leadership in innovative and sustainable sectors; (e) development and deployment of information and communication technologies, in particular through: (i) digital content; (ii) digital services; (iii) telecommunications infrastructures of high speed; (iv) broadband network; (f) climate change mitigation and adaptation, environment and resource efficiency, in particular through: (i) projects and infrastructures in the field of environmental protection and management; (ii) strengthening of eco- system services; (iii) sustainable urban and rural development; (iv) climate change actions; (g) human capital, culture and health, in particular through: (i) education and training; (ii) cultural and creative industries and projects in line with the Cultural and Creative Sector Guarantee Facility (CCS GF); (iii) innovative health solutions; (iv) new effective medicines; (v) quality social infrastructures, social services and social and solidarity economy; (vi) tourism. ; EFSI may not be used for defence or military related expenditure and current EIB lending criteria must continue to apply in this regard to purely civilian ends. The EIB shall ensure that at least 50 % of EFSI financing under the infrastructure and innovation window supports projects that contribute directly to the COP21 commitments, including that at least 20% of EFSI financing shall go to projects in the sectors listed in Article 9 (2) point (b) (ii), 20% to sectors listed point (c) related to sustainable, energy efficient, low- carbon transport and mobility projects. The EIB shall ensure that at least 20% of all EFSI financing supports projects contributing directly to tackling poverty and social exclusion The Steering Board shall provide detailed guidance to that end. All EFSI projects shall comply with National Energy and Climate Plans in delivering 2030 targets and should simultaneously be climate- proofed in line with the COP21 commitments. The Steering Board shall develop adequate assessment tools and detailed guidance to that end. EFSI financing in support of projects that contribute to climate action shall not be included into the EIB climate action target established for its standard portfolio of projects
Amendment 348 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – points (h) and (i)
Amendment 350 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h
Amendment 359 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point i
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point i
Amendment 362 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a
Amendment 379 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The investment period during which the EU guarantee may be granted for supporting financing and investment operations covered by this Regulation shall last until: (a) 31 December 2020, for EIB operations for which a contract between the EIB and the beneficiary or financial intermediary has been signed by 31 December 2022; (b) 31 December 2020, for EIF operations for which a contract between the EIF and the financial intermediary has been signed by 31 December 2022. A new investment period may be set in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 18.
Amendment 386 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
(c a) in Article 9(6), the following subparagraph 2a is added: ‘When EFSI is combined with other funds such as Horizon 2020, CEF or the European Structural and Investment Funds, the additionality criteria must apply, the highest risk tranche shall be covered by EFSI and the project eligibility criteria of the European Structural and Investment Funds shall apply to the entire project;’
Amendment 392 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) EIB loans, guarantees, counter- guarantees, capital market instruments, any other form of funding or credit enhancement instrument, including subordinated debt, equity or quasi- equity participations, including in favour of national promotional banks or institutions, investment platforms or funds;
Amendment 400 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 – point c
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – point a
(a) for debt instruments referred to in Article 10(2)(a), the principal and all interest and amounts due to the EIB but not received by it in accordance with the terms of the financing operations until the event of default; losses arising from fluctuations of currencies other than the euro in markets where possibilities for long-term hedging are limited; for subordinated debt a deferral, reduction or required exit shall be considered to be an event of default;
Amendment 404 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point i
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – second sentence
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – second sentence
Such support shall include providing targeted support on the use of technical assistance for project structuring, on the use of innovative financial instruments and on the use of public-private partnerships, and advice, as appropriate, on relevant issues relating to Union law, taking into account the specificities and needs of Member States with less- developed financial markets and different sectors.
Amendment 409 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point i a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point i a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
(i a) In Article 14, the second subparagraph is replaced by the following ‘The EIAH shall be able to provide technical assistance in the areas listed in Article 9(2), in particular energy efficiency, TEN-T and T, urban mobility. and social infrastructure.’
Amendment 410 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point ii
Regulation (UE) 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – sentence 1 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – sentence 1 a (new)
Amendment 412 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a – point ii
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – sentence 1 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – sentence 1 a (new)
It shall also support the preparation of climate action and circular economy projects or components thereof, in particular in the context of COP21, the preparation of projects in the digital sector, in the development of projects tackling poverty and social exclusion, as well as the preparation of projects referred to in the fifth subparagraph of Article 5(1).’
Amendment 417 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point i
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point i
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) leveraging local knowledge to facilitate EFSI support across the Union and contributing where possible to the objective of sectorial and geographical diversification of the EFSI referred to in Section 8 of Annex II by supporting the EIB to originate and aggregate operations;
Amendment 422 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point ii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point ii
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point e
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) providing pro-active support on the establishment of investment platforms, including sectoral investment platforms and notably in the area of energy efficiency;
Amendment 427 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point iii
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – point iii
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) providing advice on the combination of other sources of Union funding (such as the European Structural and Investment Funds, Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility) with the EFSIunder the prerequisite of EFSI taking the highest risk taking tranche, as well as informing about the respective eligibility criteria to be respected for project selection of these funds and therefore by the project as a whole;
Amendment 430 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point b – introductory part
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(iii a) The following point (fa) is added: (fa) EIAH services provided to projects covered by targeted funding under Art. 9.2. shall also be free of charge.
Amendment 435 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point d
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 14 – paragraph 6 – second sentence
Article 14 – paragraph 6 – second sentence
Cooperation between, on the one hand, the EIAH and, on the other hand, a national promotional bank or institution, an international financing institution or an institution or a managing authority, including those acting as a national advisor, having expertise relevant for the purposes of the EIAH, may take the form of a contractual partnership. In this respect, the EIAH shall assess the possibility to establish decentralised regional clusters of technical assistance to better meet the needs of a specific sector and/or region. This assessment shall be done with the involvement of Member States and national promotional banks. The EIAH shall in particular assess the relevance of establishing such a decentralised regional cluster to support energy efficiency projects in South- Eastern Europe.
Amendment 444 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c
(9 a) Article 16 (2) c) is replaced by the following: ‘(c) an assessment of the extent to which operations covered by this Regulation contribute to the achievement of the general objectives set out in Article 9(2) including an assessment of the level of EFSI investments in the areas of research, development and innovation and transport (including TEN -T and urban mobility), telecommunications, energy infrastructure and, energy efficiency; and social infrastructure, social services and social and solidarity economy;’
Amendment 445 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point f
(9 b) article 16 (2) f) is replaced by the following: ‘(f) a description of the projects where the support of the European Structural and Investment Funds is combined with the support of the EFSI, and the total amount of the contributions from each source; as well as the risk profile of each one;’
Amendment 448 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 16 – paragraph 16 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 16 a (new)
(9 b) In Article 16, a new paragraph is added: ‘16a. The Commission shall submit an annual report listing the details of all projects per policy area that received EU support through EFSI, the total amount of the contribution of each source, as well as the risk profiles.’
Amendment 456 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The EIB and EIF shall inform or shall oblige financial intermediaries to inform the final beneficiaries, including SMEs, of the existence of EFSI support. projects selected for potential use of the EFSI guarantee shall also be notified as such on the EIB website before the Investment Committee's decision. The EIB and EIF shall inform or shall oblige financial intermediaries to inform the final beneficiaries, including SMEs, of the existence of EFSI support. Financial intermediaries shall carry out active communication campaigns to potential beneficiaries of the existing EU resources managed by them, the conditions offered and how can they access to them.
Amendment 460 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In particular the EIB and the EIF shall not participate in any financing or investment operation through a vehicle located in a jurisdiction that does not co-operate with the Union in relation to the application of the intnon-cooperative jurisdiction, characterised in particular by no, or only nominal, or low taxes, a lack of effective automatic exchange of information in tax matters, a lack of transparency in legislative, judicial or administrative provisions and providing harmful tax measures as defined by the Code of Conduct on Business taxation or, identified by the Organisation for Economic Coopernationally agreed tax standards on transparency and exchange of informa and Development as being a non-cooperative jurisdiction or, identified as high risk countries pursuant to article 9 paragraph 2 of DIRECTIVE (EU) 2015/849 or, included in the common EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions.
Amendment 466 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
The Commission shall provide detailed guidance, where needed fully taking into account the obligations set out in this article.
Amendment 469 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
(12 a) In Article 22, a new paragraph 2a is added: ‘The EIB shall put in place procedures to detect when an intermediary or final recipient of EFSI funds has infringed the legislation referred to in the first subparagraph and to recover the EFSI funds from them.’
Amendment 470 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 22 a (new)
Article 22 a (new)
(12 b) A new Article is added: ‘Article 22a Gender Mainstreaming EFSI investments shall promote gender equality and the selected projects shall respect the principles of gender budgeting, notably identifying objectives linked to gender equality, designing policies according to these objectives, allocating of funds and ensuring the identification of gender indicators to measure the impact of these investments.’
Amendment 473 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – first and second sentence
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – first and second sentence
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 7(13) and (14) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from 4 July 2015. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period.; The Commission shall propose a revision of delegated regulation 2015/1558 within one month after this regulation is published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 480 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1
Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Amendment 484 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 1 – point a
Annex II – point 1 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Annex II – section 2 – point b – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Annex II – section 2 – point b – subparagraph 1 a (new)
EFSI support to motorways and airports shall be avoided, unless it is needed to support private investment in transport in cohesion countries or in cross-border transport projects involving at least one cohesion country. and refocused on low- carbon public transport projects unless directly related to mitigation of environmental damage due to existing infrastructure. EFSI support shall not be used for fossil fuel infrastructure or nuclear energy. EFSI support shall not be used for defence sector.
Amendment 491 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 1 – point b Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
Annex II – point 1 – point b Regulation (EU) No 2015/1017
In this context, it is expected that the EIB will provide finance under the EFSI with a view to reach an overall target of at least EUR 500 000 000 000 of maximum realisation of quality projects contributing i.e. to achieve EU COP21 commitments through public or private investment, including financing mobilised through the EIF under EFSI operations relating to the instruments referred to in Article 10(2)(b), national promotional banks or institutions and increased access to financing for entities having up to 3 000 employees.;
Amendment 493 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point -2 (new)
Annex II – point -2 (new)
Regulation 2015/1017
Annex II – section 3 – subparagraph 1
Annex II – section 3 – subparagraph 1
(-2) In section 3, the firs subparagraph is replaced by the following: ‘The EU guarantee shall be granted in support of operations that meet the criterion of providing additionality as defined in Article 5(1) of this Regulation. and shall generate long-term societal and environmental benefits.’
Amendment 495 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 3
Annex II – point 3
The scoreboard shall be made public as soon as an operation under the EU guarantee is signed, with the exclusion of commercially sensitive informationis approved, with the exclusion of commercially sensitive information. the Investment Committee shall provide the Parliament with the scoreboard of indicators of rejected operations with the exclusion of commercially sensitive information as well as an overview of the investment-weighted aggregate scores of approved projects.
Amendment 499 #
2016/0276(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 6 – point c a (new)
Annex II – point 6 – point c a (new)
Regulation 2015/1017
Annex II – section 8 – point b
Annex II – section 8 – point b
(c a) in section 8, point b, the first paragraph is replaced by the following: ‘EFSI- supported operations shall not be concentrated in any specific territory at the end of the initial investment period. To this end the Steering Board shall adopt and ensure the effective implementation of indicative geographical diversification and concentration guidelines. The Steering Board may decide to modify these indicative limits, after consulting the Investment Committee. The Steering Board shall explain its decisions relating to the indicative limits to the European Parliament and the Council in writing. The EFSI shouldall aim to cover all Member States.’
Amendment 223 #
2016/0225(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Regulation EU No 516/2014
Article 17 - paragraph 1
Article 17 - paragraph 1
1. In addition to their allocation calculated in accordance with point (a) of Article 15(1), Member States shall receive for each resettled person in accordance with a targeted Union resettlement scheme a lump sum of EUR 10,000. All financial resources allocated are addressed to resettlement purposes and not other actions financed by Regulation EU No 516/2014 such as funding of Immigration Detention Centres.