5 Amendments of Carlos COELHO related to 2010/2154(INI)
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls that the use of body scanners must comply with Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for people who are willing to be submitted to a body scan to be properly and comprehensibly informed about the body scanner, including their right to refuse to be submitted to a body scan and their right to complain and seek redress in case of perceived irregularities related to the body scan or their refusal to be submitted to it and the subsequent standard security check; recalls that the training of airport security personnel is a basic necessity;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Underlines the importance of penalties for any instances of misuse of body scanner images;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that any proposal to allow the deployment and use of body scanners as a permissible screening method should be extensively justified in an impact assessment covering inter aliashowing what the real added value of this kind of initiative would be; insists in this regard on the importance of calculating the cost of investment, maintenance and management which would be incurred by installing and using body scanners; recalls that the impact assessment must also cover the fundamental rights aspect of body scanners and, the possible health risks – particularly for vulnerable persons – and the protection of personal data, taking into account the opinions of the European Union, international and national human rights and data protection authorities, such as the EDPS, the Article 29 Working Party, the FRA and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Protection of Human Rights while Countering Terrorism;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Underlines that those Member States which decide to use body scanners should be able, under the principle of subsidiarity, to apply more rigid standards than those defined in the European legislation on the protection of citizens and their personal data;