BETA

10 Amendments of Carlos COELHO related to 2016/0357A(COD)

Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) The ETIAS should also support the objectives of the Schengen Information System (SIS) related to the alerts in respect of persons wanted for arrest or for surrender or extradition purposes, on missing persons, on persons sought to assist with a judicial procedure and on persons for discreet checks, inquiry checks or specific checks. For this purpose the ETIAS should carry out an automated processing of the application files against the relevant alerts in the SIS. This processing will be carried for the purpose of supporting the SIS. Accordingly, any hit resulting from this comparison should be stored in should be dealt with in accordance withe SIS legislation.
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
In particular, tThe ETIAS Central System shall verify:
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 568 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) an alert in respect of persons wanted for arrest for surrender purposes or extradition purposes;deleted
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 570 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Any hit resulting from this comparison shall be stored in the SIS.deleted
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Where the comparison referred to in paragraph 7 reports one or several hits, the ETIAS Central System shall send an automated notification to the ETIAS Central Unit which shall verify whether the applicant personal data corresponds to the personal data contained in the alert having triggered that hit. If the comparison referred to in paragraph 7 reports one or several hits during the automated processing referred to in Article 18 (2) (a), (c) and (d), the ETIAS Central System shall send an automated notification to the SIRENE Bureau of the Member State that created the alert, which shall verify whether the applicant personal data corresponds to the personal data contained in the alert having triggered that hit.
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. The notification provided to the SIRENE Bureau of the Member State that issued the alert shall contain the following data: (a) surname(s), first name(s) and, if any, alias; (b) place and date of birth; (c) sex; (d) nationality(ies); (e) address of the first intended stay or, in case of transit, Member State of first intended transit entry; (f) travel authorization status information, indicating whether a travel authorisation has been issued, refused or whether the application is subject to a manual assessment pursuant to Article 22; (g) a reference to the hit(s)obtained, including the date and time of the hit.
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. The ETIAS Central System shall add a reference to any hit obtained to the application file.
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Where the automated processing laid down in Article 18(2) to (5) reports a hit of a European Arrest Warrant, and without prejudice to the procedure laid down in paragraph 7a of article 18 and in Article 22, the travel authorization shall not be refused.
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The ETIAS National Unit of the responsible Member State may request, in accordance with the [SIS directive], that an alert for specific, [inquiry] or discreet check is created in SIS. Such alert may also be created upon the request of a consulted Member State.
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 783 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. A travel authorization shall not preclude any actions regarding an alert on the SIS.
2017/10/04
Committee: LIBE