76 Amendments of Martin SCHIRDEWAN related to 2018/0114(COD)
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) The Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council41 regulates cross-border mergers of limited liability companies. These rules represent a significant milestone in improving the functioning of the Single Market for companies and firms and to exercise the freedom of establishment and, at the same time, offer appropriate and adequate protection to the parties concerned, such as workers, creditors and minority shareholders. However, evaluation of these rules shows that there is a need for modifications in cross-border merger rules. Furthermore, it is appropriate to provide for rules regulating cross-border conversions and divisions. _________________ 41 Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 relating to certain aspects of company law (codification) (OJ L 169, 30.6.2017, p. 46).
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) It is appropriate therefore to provide procedural and substantive rules on cross-border conversions which would contribute to the abolition of restrictions onsimplify freedom of establishment and provide at the same time adequate and proportionateprovide strong protection for stakeholders such as employees, creditors and minority shareholders.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The right to convert an existing company formed in a Member State into a company governed by another Member State may in certain circumstances be used for abusive purposes such as for the circumvention of labour standards, social security payments, tax obligations, creditors', minority shareholders' rights or rules on employees participation. In order to combat such possible abuses, a general principle of Union law, Member States are required to ensure that companies do not use the cross-border conversion procedure in order to create purely artificial arrangements aimed at obtaining undue tax advantages or at unduly prejudicing the legal or contractual rights of employees, creditors or members. Member States should be able to block the possibility of conversions and mergers leading to artificial arrangements resorted to by undertakings with the aim of evading future obligations arising from national rules on taxation and employee participation. In so far as it constitutes a derogation from a fundamental freedom, the fight against abuses must be interpreted strictly and be based on an individual assessment of all relevant circumstances. A procedural and substantive framework which describes the margin of discretion and allows for the diversity of approach by Member States whilst at the same time setting out the requirements to streamline the actions to be taken by national authorities to fight abuses in conformity with Union law should be laid down.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) To allow all stakeholders' legitimate interests to be taken into account in the procedure governing a cross-border conversion, the company should disclose the draft terms of the cross-border conversion containing the most important information about the proposed cross- border conversion, including the envisaged new company form, the instrument of constitution and the proposed timetable for the conversion. Members, creditors, trade unions and employees of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion should be notified in order that they can submit comments with regard to the proposed conversion.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) In order to assess the accuracy of the information contained in the draft terms of conversion and merger and in the reports addressed to the members and employees and to provide factual elements necessary to assess whether the proposed conversion constitutes an artificial arrangement, an independent expert report should be required to be prepared in order to assess the proposed cross-border conversion and merger. In order to securguarantee the independence of the expert, the expert should be appointed jointly by the competent authority, following an application by the companyat the request of the company and, if available, by the competent body of the organisation representing the company’s employees. In this context, the expert report should present all relevant information to enable the competent authority in the departure Member State to take an informed decision as to whether or not to issue the pre- conversion certificate. To this end, the expert should be able to obtain all the relevant company information and documents and carry out all necessary investigations in order to gather all the evidence required. He or she should also be required to receive and consider comments and opinions from financial authorities, social insurance bodies, the representatives of the employees of the company, or, where there are no such representatives, from the employees themselves and also from the creditors and members of the company. The expert should use information, in particular net turnover and profit or loss, number of employees and the composition of balance sheet collected by the company in view of the preparation of financial statements in accordance with Union law and the law of Member States. However, in order to protect any confidential information, including business secrets of the company, the critical parts of such information should not form part of the expert’s final report which itself would bbe redacted before being made publically available. as part of the final report.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Recital 14
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The issue of the pre-conversion certificate by the departure Member State should be scrutinised to ensure the legality of the cross-border conversion of the company. The competent authority of the departure Member State should decide on the issue of the pre-conversion certificate within onetwo months of the application by the company, unless it has serious concerns as to the existence of an artificial arrangement aimed at obtaining undue tax advantages or unduly prejudicing the legal or contractual rights of employees, creditors or members. In such a case, the competent authority should carry out an in- depth assessment. However, this in-depth assessment should not be carried out systematically, but it should be conducted on a case-by-case basis, where there are serious concerns as to the existence of an artificial arrangement. For their assessment, competent authorities should take into account at least a number of factors laid down in this Directive which however should be only considered as indicative factors in the overall assessment and not be considered in isolation. In order not to burden companies with an overly lengthy procedure, this in-depth assessment should in any event be concluded within twofour months of informing the company that the in-depth assessment will be carried out.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) After having received a pre- conversion certificate, and after verifying that the incorporation requirements in the destination Member State are fulfilled, the competent authorities of the destination Member State should register the company in the business register of that Member State. Only after this registration should the competent authority of the departure Member State strike the company off its own register. It should not be possible for the competent authority of the destination Member State to challenge the accuracy of the information provided by the pre- conversion certificate, particularly in order to avoid artificial arrangements. As a consequence of the cross-border conversion, the converted company should retain its legal personality, its assets and liabilities and all rights and obligations, including rights and obligations arising from contracts, acts or omissions.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) The evaluation of the implementation of the cross-border merger rules in Member States has shown that the number of cross-border mergers in the Union has significantly increased. However, this evaluation has also revealed certain shortcomings in relation specifically to creditor protection, protection of employees and shareholder protection as well as to the lack of simplified procedures which impede the full effectiveness and efficiency of those cross-border merger rules.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
Recital 37
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
Recital 38
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
Recital 38
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
Recital 39
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 40
Recital 40
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
Recital 41
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 42
Recital 42
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 43
Recital 43
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 44
Recital 44
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
Recital 45
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 46
Recital 46
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 47
Recital 47
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 48
Recital 48
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 49
Recital 49
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 50
Recital 50
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 51
Recital 51
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 52
Recital 52
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 53
Recital 53
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 54
Recital 54
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 55
Recital 55
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 56
Recital 56
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 58
Recital 58
(58) The provisions of this Directive do not affect the legal or administrative provisions, including the enforcement of tax rules in cross-border conversions, and mergers and divisions, of national law relating to the taxes of Member States, or itstheir territorial andor administrative subdivisions.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 60
Recital 60
(60) Since the objectives of this Directive, to facilitate and regulate cross- border conversions, and mergers and divisions, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 b – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 86 b – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6a) ‘artificial arrangement’ means a company structure set up for abusive purposes, such as the circumvention of obligations arising from the legal and contractual rights of employees, creditors, or minority shareholders, the avoidance of rules on employee involvement, of social security payments, or of tax obligations due on profits generated, or a company structure which does not carry out a substantive or genuine economic activity supported by staff, equipment, assets and premises, such as, in particular, in the case of a ‘letterbox’ or ‘front’ subsidiary.
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 c – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 86 c – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(e a) there is a suspicion of welfare fraud or the infringement of workers’ rights;
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 c – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
Article 86 c – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
(eb) the company was involved in tax fraud, tax evasion or the setting up of harmful tax structures;
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 c – paragraph 3
Article 86 c – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that the competent authority of the departure Member State shall not authorise the cross- border conversion where it determines, after an examination of the specific case and having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances, that it constitutes an artificial arrangement aimed at obtaining undue tax advantages or at unduly prejudicing the legal or contractual rights of employees, creditors or minority members. The company carrying out the cross-border conversion must demonstrate, on the basis of ascertainable objective factors, that it is actually established and pursues substantive and genuine economic activity in the destination Member State for an indefinite period.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 d – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
Article 86 d – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
(ka) detailed information on the transfer of the central administration or principle place of business;
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 e – paragraph 4
Article 86 e – paragraph 4
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 f – paragraph 3
Article 86 f – paragraph 3
3. The report referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, shall be made available, at least electronically, to the trade unions and the representatives of the employees of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion or, where there are no such representatives, to the employees themselves not less than two months before the date of the general meeting referred to in Article 86i. That report shall also be made similarly available to the members of the company carrying out the cross-border conversion.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 f – paragraph 5
Article 86 f – paragraph 5
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 86 g – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that the company carrying out the cross-border conversion and, where one exists, the competent organ of the company’s employee representation applies not less than twofour months before the date of the general meeting referred to in Article 86i to the competent authority designated in accordance with Article 86m(1), to appoint an expert to examine and assess the draft terms of the cross-border conversion and the reports referred to in Articles 86e and 86f for both form and content, subject to the proviso set out in paragraph 6 of this Article.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 86 g – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) a detailed assessment of the accuracy of the reports and information submitted by the company carrying out the cross-border conversion in terms of both form and content;
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 4
Article 86 g – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that the independent expert shall be entitled to obtain, from the company carrying out the cross-border conversion, all relevant information and documents and to carry out all necessary investigations to verify all elements of the draft terms or management reports. The expert shall also be entitlobliged to receive and consider comments and opinions from thefinancial authorities, social security programmes, trade unions, representatives of the employees of the company, or, where there are no such representatives, from the employees themselves and also from the creditors and members of the company. These shall be attached to the report as appendices.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 5
Article 86 g – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that information and opinions submitted to the independent expert can only be used for the purpose of drafting their report and that confidential information, including business secrets, shall not be disclosed. Where appropriate, the expert may submit a separate document containing any such confidential information to the competent authority, designated in accordance with Article 86m(1) and that separate document shall only be made available to the company carrying out the cross- border conversion and not be disclosed to any other paare treated as confidential. Business secrets in particular shall be redacted at key points in the reporty.
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 6
Article 86 g – paragraph 6
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 g – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 86 g – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. For reasons of transparency, the report shall be made available to the public.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 h – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 86 h – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 l – paragraph 2
Article 86 l – paragraph 2
2. However, the rules in force concerning employee participation, if any, in the destination Member State shall not apply, where the company carrying out the conversion has, in the six monthsyear prior to the publication of the draft terms of the cross- border conversion as referred to in Article 86d of this Directive, an average number of employees equivalent to four fifths of the applicable threshold, laid down in the law of the departure Member State, which triggers the participation of employees within the meaning of point (k) of Article 2 of Directive 2001/86/EC, or where the same is true of the converted company within one year of the conversion, or where the national law of the destination Member State does not:
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 l – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 86 l – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) provide for employees of establishments and subsidiaries of the company resulting from the conversion that are situated in other Member States the same entitlement to exercise participation rights as is enjoyed by those employees employed in the destination Member State.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 l – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 86 l – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. In the cases referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, the participation of employees in the converted company and their involvement in the definition of such rights shall be regulated by the Member States, mutatis mutandis and subject to paragraphs 4 to 7 of this Article, in accordance with the principles and procedures laid down in Article 12(1), (2), (3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 and the following provisions of Directive 2001/86/EC:
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 l – paragraph 4 – point a
Article 86 l – paragraph 4 – point a
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 l – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 86 l – paragraph 4 – point b
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 l – paragraph 7
Article 86 l – paragraph 7
7. Where the converted company is operating under an employee participation system, that company shall be obliged to take measures to ensure that employees' participation rights are protected in the event of any subsequent cross-border or domestic merger, division or conversion for a period of threfive years after the cross- border conversion has taken effect, by applying mutatis mutandis the rules laid down in paragraphs 1 to 6.
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 m – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 86 m – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 m – paragraph 6
Article 86 m – paragraph 6
6. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities designated in accordance with paragraph 1 may consult other relevant authorities from both the departure Member State and the destination member state with competence in the different fields concerned by the cross-border conversion.
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 m – paragraph 7 – introductory part
Article 86 m – paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. Member States shall ensure that the assessment by the competent authority is carried out within onetwo months of the date of receipt of the information concerning the approval of the conversion by the general meeting of the company. It shall have one of the following outcomes:
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 m – paragraph 7 – point c
Article 86 m – paragraph 7 – point c
(c) where the competent authority has serious concernsre is reason to suspect that the cross-border conversion constitutes an artificial arrangement referred to in Article 86c(3), it may, the authority should decide to carry out an in-depth assessment in accordance with Article 86n and shall inform the company about its decision to conduct such an assessment and of the subsequent outcome.
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Member States shall ensure in order to assess whether the cross-border conversion constitutes an artificial arrangement within the meaning of Article 86c(3), that the competent authority of the departure Member State carries out an in-depth assessment of all relevant facts and circumstances and shall take into account at a minimum the following: the characteristics of the establishment in the destination Member State, including the intent, the sector, the investment, the net turnover and profit or loss, number of employees, the composition of the balance sheet, the tax residence, the assets and their location, the habitual place of work of the employees and of specific groups of employees, the place where social contributions are due and the commercial risks assumed by the converted company in the destination Member State and the departure Member State.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 n – paragraph 2
Article 86 n – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that where the competent authority referred to in paragraph 1 decides to carry out an in- depth assessment, it is able to hear the company and all parties that have submitted observations pursuant Article 86h(1)(c) in accordance with national law. The competent authorities referred to in paragraph 1 may also hear any other interested third parties in accordance with national law. The competent authority shall take its final decision regarding the issue of the pre-conversion certificate within twofour months from the start of the in-depth assessment.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 o – paragraph 2
Article 86 o – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that the decision to issue the pre-conversion certificate is sent to the authorities referred to in Article 86m(1) and to all parties that have submitted observations pursuant to Article 86h(1)(c) in accordance with national law and that the decisions to issue or refuse to issue a pre-conversion certificate are available through the system of interconnection of registers set up in accordance with Article 22.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 86 p – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 86 p – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b a (new)
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 119 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 119 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 120 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new)
Article 120 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new)
(e a) there is a suspicion of social fraud or infringements of workers’ rights;
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 123 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 123 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 124 – paragraph 3
Article 124 – paragraph 3
3. The report shall be made available, at least electronically, to the members of each of the merging companies not less than one month before the date of the general meeting referred to in Article 126. The report shall also be made similarly available to the trade unions and the representatives of the employees of each of the merging companies, or where there are no such representatives, to the employees themselves. However, where the approval of the merger is not required by general meeting of the acquiring company in accordance with Article 126(3), the report shall be made available, at least one month before the date of the general meeting of the other merging company or companies.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 124 – paragraph 4
Article 124 – paragraph 4
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 124 a – paragraph 4
Article 124 a – paragraph 4
4. Where the management or administrative organ of one or more of the merging companies receives, in good time, an opinion from the representatives of their employees, or, where there are no such representatives, from the employees themselves, as provided for under national law, the members shall be informed thereof and that opinion shall be appended to the report.
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – introductory part
(11) in Article 125(1), the following second subparagraph is added is amended as follows:
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 125 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 125 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 125
Article 125
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point a
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 127 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 127 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15 – point b
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 128 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 128 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point -a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18 – point -a (new)
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Article 133 – paragraph 2
Article 133 – paragraph 2
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 20
Directive (EU) No 2017/1132
Title II – Chapter IV (new)
Title II – Chapter IV (new)
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall, no later than five years after [OP please insert the date of the end of the transposition period of this Directive] and subsequently every five years, carry out an evaluation of this Directive and present a Report on the findings to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal. The evaluation shall in particular examine whether a positive impact has been achieved regarding eliminating artificial and/or harmful arrangements, and its impact on workers’ rights. The European Commission shall consult the European social partners. Member States shall provide the Commission with the information necessary for the preparation of that report, in particular by providing data on the number of cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions, their duration and related costs.