8 Amendments of Caroline NAGTEGAAL related to 2020/2015(INI)
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that the development of AI technologies in the transport sector has the potential to bring considerable economic, societal, environmental and safety benefits;will bring innovation, research, creation of new jobs, mobilisation of investment, employment, economic, societal, environmental and safety benefits that can make the sector more attractive to new generations
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Affirms that defining the appropriate legal framework at EU level for intellectual property rights for AI and connectivity innovations, as well as for access to and security of data will be key in the development and smooth and wide dissemination of AI technologies in transport and for the creation of confidence and legal certainty in the sector;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that IP protection strategies will constantly evolve over time as AI evolves, and that it will be necessary to take account of issues such as flexible copyright, patent protection or even trade secrets rules, and to consider what route will provide innovators with the broadest and most robust means of IP protection that combine legal certainty and encourage new investment in private enterprises, universities, SMEs, clusters using public-private collaboration to support for research and development;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the current fragmented legal framework of IP rights represents an obstacle for the development of AI technologies in transport;and calls on the Commission, therefore, to evaluate the fitness of its intellectual property regime for the development of AI technologies and to put forward the legislative proposals it finds necessaryo review the current legislation and to put forward the legislative proposals it finds necessary in order to have a more transparent system and avoid fragmentation at European level by jeopardising the internal market;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the possibility and relevance for companies of obtaining patents based on software or algorithms with a view to ensuring both the protection of innovation and the need for transparency required for trustworthy AI; stresses the need of maintaining a level playing field between these companies, as well as the importance of remaining consistent with competition law. stresses the importance of addressing the AI and IP in the transport sector, in full compliance with the principle of technological neutrality;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Is fully aware that progress in AI will have to be paired with public investment in infrastructure, training in digital skills, major improvements in connectivity in order to come to full fruition; takes note of the intensive patenting activity taking place in the transport sector when it comes to AI; expresses its concern that this may result in massive litigation that will be detrimental to the industry as a whole; if we do not legislate urgently at European level;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to address the questionurgently the legislative proposals of data and intellectual property protection;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to pay special attention to access for SMEs and clusters to data that could boost their activity as well as to technology centres and universities to promote their research programmes;