BETA

7 Amendments of Caroline NAGTEGAAL related to 2021/0239(COD)

Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33 a (new)
(33a) The use of electronic money products is increasingly considered to be a substitute for bank accounts which, in addition to the measures laid down in Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, justifies subjecting those products to anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) obligations. However, in certain proven low-risk circumstances and under strict risk- mitigating conditions, Member States should be allowed to exempt electronic money products from certain customer due diligence measures, such as the identification and verification of the customer and of the beneficial owner, but not from the monitoring of transactions or of business relationships. The risk- mitigating conditions should include a requirement that exempt electronic money products be used exclusively for purchasing goods or services and that the amount stored electronically be low enough to preclude circumvention of the AML/CFT rules. Such an exemption should be without prejudice to the discretion given to Member States to allow obliged entities to apply simplified customer due diligence measures to other electronic money products posing lower risks. _________________ 1a Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 2000/46/EC (OJ L 267, 10.10.2009, p. 7).
2022/07/04
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 94
(94) The use of large cash payments is highly vulnerable to money laundering and terrorist financing; this has not been sufficiently mitigated by the requirement for traders in goods to be subject to anti- money laundering rules when making or receiving cash payments of EUR 10 000 or more. At the same time, differences in approaches among Member States have undermined the level playing field within the internal market to the detriment of businesses located in Member States with stricter controls. It is therefore necessary to introduce a Union-wide limit to large cash payments of EUR 10 5000. Member States should be able to adopt lower thresholds and further stricter provisions.
2022/07/04
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15a Exemption from the application of customer due diligence 1. By way of derogation from Article 16(1), first subparagraph, points (a), (b) and (c), and Article 19, and based on an appropriate risk assessment which demonstrates a low risk, obliged entities may decide not to apply certain customer due diligence measures with respect to electronic money where all of the following risk-mitigating conditions are met: (a) the payment instrument used to store the electronic money is not reloadable or has a maximum monthly payment transaction limit of EUR 150 which can be used only in that Member State; (b) the maximum amount stored electronically on the payment instrument does not exceed EUR 150; (c) the payment instrument is used exclusively to purchase goods or services; (d) the payment instrument cannot be funded with anonymous electronic money; (e) the issuer carries out sufficient monitoring of the transactions or business relationship to enable the detection of unusual or suspicious transactions. 2. The derogation provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article shall not apply in the case of redemption in cash or cash withdrawal of the monetary value of the electronic money where the amount redeemed exceeds EUR 50 or, in the case of remote payment transactions as defined in Article 4, point (6), of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, where the amount paid exceeds EUR 50 per transaction. 3. Credit institutions and financial institutions acting as acquirers shall only accept payments carried out with anonymous prepaid cards issued in third countries where such cards meet requirements equivalent to those set out in paragraphs 1 and 2. 4. Member States may decide not to accept on their territory payments carried out by using anonymous prepaid cards. _________________ 1a Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35).
2022/07/05
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 885 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1
1. To the extent that it is strictly necessary for the purposes of preventing money laundering and terrorist financing, obliged entities may processand AML compliance entities may process personal data, including special categories of personal data referred to in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences referred to in Article 10 of that Regulation subject to the safeguards provided for in paragraphs 2 and 3. On the basis of this Regulation, only to the extent that it is necessary and proportionate for the purposes of the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, obliged entities may share this data with other obliged entities.
2022/07/05
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 900 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 a (new)
Article 55a Information exchange (1) Obliged persons, competent authorities [within the meaning of Art. 2(31) of the Draft Regulation] and other public authorities of the EU and EU Member States, insofar as they act for the purpose of combating money laundering or terrorist financing, may provide each other, directly or through public-private partnerships (PPPs), insofar as they pursue the purpose of combating money laundering or terrorist financing, with information containing anomalies or unusual features indicating money laundering, one of its predicate offences or terrorist financing. The exchange of information may only take place for the purpose of combating money laundering, one of its predicate offenses or the financing of terrorism. (2) Within the framework of the exchange of information pursuant to paragraph 1, the persons referred to in paragraph 1 may also process personal data within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 1 of the General Data Protection Regulation [as defined in Art. 4 No. 2 of the General Data Protection Regulation]. Art. 14 (1) to (4) of the General Data Protection Regulation shall not apply; Art. 15, 16 and 18 of the General Data Protection Regulation shall apply subject to the consent of the competent authorities [as defined in Art. 2 (31) of the Draft Regulation]. The personal data shall be deleted after the expiration of 5 years after receipt of the data, unless there is a legal obligation or justification for the continued retention of the data. (3) Information pursuant to paragraph 1, which is related to specific facts, may only be disclosed by obligated parties, irrespective of the submission of a notification pursuant to Art. 50 et seq. Draft Regulation may only be disclosed by obligated parties to other obligated parties if the information is not disclosed to 1. the contracting party of the obligated party submitting the report, 2. the principal of a transaction related to the facts of the case, 3. the beneficial owner of the persons referred to in points 1 and 2, 4. a person who has been appointed as a representative or messenger by one of the persons mentioned in numbers 1 to 3, 5. the legal counsel mandated by any of the persons referred to in numbers 1 to 4, and 6. other third parties not mentioned in paragraph 1. (4) Information referred to in paragraph 1, for which an obliged person has made a report pursuant to Art. 50 et seq. of the Draft Regulation or on the basis of which such a report is about to be made, may be shared pursuant to paragraph 1 only if the competent authorities [within the meaning of Art. 2 par. 31 of the Draft Regulation] have previously given their consent to an exchange of information to all or selected persons referred to in paragraph 1. An information exchange pursuant to Art. 54 (2)-(6) of the Draft Regulation remains unaffected by this.
2022/07/05
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 903 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 b (new)
Article 55b Exchange of data under Public Private Partnerships 1. For the purpose of combating money laundering and terrorist financing and related predicate offences, including for the fulfilment of their obligations under Chapter V of this Regulation [(reporting obligations)], obliged entities may, together with competent authorities as defined in Article 2(31) of this Regulation, including Europol, participate in cooperation arrangements established in one or across several Member States. 2. Without prejudice of Regulation 2016/679, for no other purposes than those specifically mentioned in the arrangements pursuant to this Article and to the extent it is necessary to exchange information referred to in Article 54, by way of derogation of Article 54(1) of this Regulation, obliged entities participating in such arrangements may exchange the necessary information with other participating obliged entities and the competent authorities. Within the cooperation arrangements referred to in paragraph 1 and where such arrangements involve, inter alia, cooperation and information exchange between obliged entities and the aforementioned authorities, obliged entities shall process personal data in accordance with [new article on processing of personal data for AML purposes].
2022/07/05
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 926 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 1
1. Persons trading in goods or providing services may accept or make a payment in cash only up to an amount of EUR 10 5000 or equivalent amount in national or foreign currency, whether the transaction is carried out in a single operation or in several operations which appear to be linked.
2022/07/05
Committee: ECONLIBE