BETA

8 Amendments of Evelyne GEBHARDT related to 2011/2085(INI)

Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that the mutual evaluation process enables Member States’ administrations to get to know each other better and leads to the creation of a basis of human trust which is the foundation of a successful internal market;
2011/07/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Notes, however, that the mutual evaluation procedure can be cumbersome, time-consuming and expensive, and that the correlation tables are therefore indispensable in the transposition of European legislation;
2011/07/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the involvement of stakeholders in the process of mutual evaluation was limited; acknowledges that a certain degree of confidentiality was an important condition to create a mutual trust between Members States; Nevertheless, regrets that the regular feedback of the process has not been provided to the stakeholders;Does not affect English text.
2011/07/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to focus its targeted actions on the requirements which if removed would bring maximum added value to the functioning of the single market for services in full compliance with Article 1 of the Services Directive; asks the Commission to target its work towards the sectors and professions with a high potential for cross - border provision of services;
2011/07/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Urges the Commission to work further to ensure the proper application of the freedom to provide services clause in Article 16;Does not affect English text.
2011/07/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. rReiterates its support to the use of mutual evaluation in other policy areas, where appropriate; Bbelieves that mutual evaluation has proven innovative and useful and shouldmay be seen as a tool to improve the functioning of the Single Market;
2011/07/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Recommends that mutual evaluation should be used as a 'flexible instrument' on a case-by-case basis; suggests that the tool should be proposed for thein a targeted manner for inclusion in selected Directives of a 'horizontal' nature which imply numerous transposition measures and provide for a wide margin of discretion for the Member States; suggests furthermore a targeted use of mutual evaluation whereby only a key provisions of a Directive are subject to the procedure;
2011/07/19
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Asks the Commission to increase transparency by regular reports throughout the different stages of mutual evaluation to keep stakeholders updated; calls on the Commission to make the main conclusions of the cluster and plenary meetings public;Does not affect English text.
2011/07/19
Committee: IMCO