4 Amendments of Arba KOKALARI related to 2020/2016(INI)
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that AI used by police and judicial authorities has to be categorised as high-risk, given that the role of these authorities is to defend the public interest; considers that the EU should take the lead in laying down basic rules on the development and use of AI to ensure the same high level of consumer protection across the EU while encouraging innovation and minimising regulatory burdens on businesses, especially SMEs;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that AI should help to ease the administrative burden on public authorities, without ever replacing human decisions, and that AI systems should rely on human oversight;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that such tools should be released as open source software under the public procurement procedure, and that a fundamental rights audit should be part of a prior conformity assessment; believes that – while ensuring the respect of EU law and values and the applicable data protection rules, and without jeopardising investigations or criminal prosecutions – training data must be open datashould be publicly available when relevant and proportionate;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls the high risk of abuse of certain types of AI, including facial recognition technologies in public spaces, automated behaviour detection and profiling to divide people into risk categories at borders, and calls on the Commission to ban them; carefully monitor and evaluate the use of these technologies;