4 Amendments of Arba KOKALARI related to 2020/2017(INI)
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the use of AI-based products in education and the potential of technology to make high-quality education available to all EU pupils, especially in sparsely populated and socio- economically vulnerable areas;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. ExpStresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good)how important it is that the market for technological services used in education should be characterised by free competition and diversity of providers; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; welcomes the use of data from AI applications used in the public sector in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices;
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the unreliability offact that the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared; calls for a ban on generalised moderation and automated content filters are not always sufficient;
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for recommendation algorithmStresses the importance of access to consumer information for a system of recommendations and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services; stresses that measures to ensure transparency and the possibility of opting out from recommended and personalised serviceof personal recommendations must be proportionate and take into account implementation costs for SMEs.