BETA

56 Amendments of Niclas HERBST related to 2022/0155(COD)

Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Subsequently, the provider shall update the risk assessment where necessary and at least once every three years from the date at which it last carried out or updated the risk assessment. However: (a) for a service which is subject to a detection order issued in accordance with Article 7, the provider shall update the risk assessment at the latest two months before the expiry of the period of application of the detection order; (b) the Coordinating Authority of establishment may require the provider to update the risk assessment at a reasonable earlier date than the date referred to in the second subparagraph, where there is evidence indicating a possible substantial change in the risk that the service is used for the purpose of online child sexual abuse.deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 876 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 a (new)
Article6a End-to-end encrypted services Nothing in this Regulation shall be interpreted as prohibiting, weakening or compromising the integrity and confidentiality of end-to-end encrypted content and communications. Nothing in this regulation shall thus be interpreted as justifying client-side scanning with side- channel leaks or other measures by which the provider of a hosting service or a provider of interpersonal communication services provides third party actors access to end-to-end encrypted content. No provider of a hosting service or provider of interpersonal communication services shall be compelled to enable or create access to communcations by means of bypassing user authentication or encryption under the scope of this regulation.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 882 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – title
Issuance of targeted detection orders
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 888 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The Coordinating Authority of establishment shall have the power to request the competent judicial authority of the Member State that designated it or another independent administrative authority of that Member State to issue a targeted detection order requiring a provider of hosting services or a provider of interpersonal communications services under the jurisdiction of that Member State to take the measures specified in Article 10 to detect indivdual cases of online child sexual abuse on a specific service. The scope of a targeted detection order shall be limited to individual users or groups of users for whom there is evidence suggesting that their conduct might have a link with child sexual abuse offences.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 893 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The Coordinating Authority of establishment shall have the power to request the competent judicial authority of the Member State that designated it or another independent administrative authority of that Member State to issue a targeted detection order requiring a provider of hosting services or a provider of interpersonal communications services under the jurisdiction of that Member State to take the measures specified in Article 10 to detect online child sexual abuse on a specific service.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 900 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The request of the Coordinating Authority of establishment shall, before requesting the issuance of a detection order, carry out the investigations and assessments necessary to determfor a targeted detection order shall include any evidence suggesting individual or collective conduct that establishes a linek whether the conditions of paragraph 4 have been metith child sexual abuse offences, in particular previous offences.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 903 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
To that end, it may, where appropriate, require the provider to submit the necessary information, additional to the report and the further information referred to in Article 5(1) and (3), respectively,evidence within a reasonable time period set by that Coordinating Authority, or request the EU Centre, another public authority or relevant experts or entities to provide the necessary additional information.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 907 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
[...]deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 950 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Coordinating Authority of establishment shall request the issuance of the detection order, and the competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority shall issue the detection order where it considers that the following conditions are met:
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 953 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Coordinating Authority of establishment shall request the issuance of the targeted detection order, and the competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority shall issue the targeted detection order where it considers that the following conditions are met:in accordance with the applicable legal standard for evidence in criminal law.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 955 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) there is evidence of a significant risk of the service being used for the purpose of online child sexual abuse, within the meaning of paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, as applicable;deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 964 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) the reasons for issuing the detection order outweigh negative consequences for the rights and legitimate interests of all parties affected, having regard in particular to the need to ensure a fair balance between the fundamental rights of those parties.deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 975 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
When assessing whether the conditions of the first subparagraph have been met, account shall be taken of all relevant facts and circumstances of the case at hand, in particular: (a) the risk assessment conducted or updated and any mitigation measures taken by the provider pursuant to Articles 3 and 4, including any mitigation measures introduced, reviewed, discontinued or expanded pursuant to Article 5(4) where applicable; (b) any additional information obtained pursuant to paragraph 2 or any other relevant information available to it, in particular regarding the use, design and operation of the service, regarding the provider’s financial and technological capabilities and size and regarding the potential consequences of the measures to be taken to execute the detection order for all other parties affected; (c) the views and the implementation plan of the provider submitted in accordance with paragraph 3; (d) the opinions of the EU Centre and of the data protection authority submitted in accordance with paragraph 3.deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 997 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. As regards detection orders concerning the dissemination of known child sexual abuse material, the significant risk referred to in paragraph 4, first subparagraph, point (a), shall be deemed to exist where the following conditions are met: (a) it is likely, despite any mitigation measures that the provider may have taken or will take, that the service is used, to an appreciable extent for the dissemination of known child sexual abuse material; (b) there is evidence of the service, or of a comparable service if the service has not yet been offered in the Union at the date of the request for the issuance of the detection order, having been used in the past 12 months and to an appreciable extent for the dissemination of known child sexual abuse material.deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1000 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6
6. As regards detection orders concerning the dissemination of new child sexual abuse material, the significant risk referred to in paragraph 4, first subparagraph, point (a), shall be deemed to exist where the following conditions are met: (a) it is likely that, despite any mitigation measures that the provider may have taken or will take, the service is used, to an appreciable extent, for the dissemination of new child sexual abuse material; (b) there is evidence of the service, or of a comparable service if the service has not yet been offered in the Union at the date of the request for the issuance of the detection order, having been used in the past 12 months and to an appreciable extent, for the dissemination of new child sexual abuse material; (c) for services other than those enabling the live transmission of pornographic performances as defined in Article 2, point (e), of Directive 2011/93/EU: (1) a detection order concerning the dissemination of known child sexual abuse material has been issued in respect of the service; (2) the provider submitted a significant number of reports concerning known child sexual abuse material, detected through the measures taken to execute the detection order referred to in point (1), pursuant to Article 12.deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1009 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 7
7. As regards detection orders concerning the solicitation of children, the significant risk referred to in paragraph 4, first subparagraph, point (a), shall be deemed to exist where the following conditions are met: (a) the provider qualifies as a provider of interpersonal communication services; (b) it is likely that, despite any mitigation measures that the provider may have taken or will take, the service is used, to an appreciable extent, for the solicitation of children; (c) there is evidence of the service, or of a comparable service if the service has not yet been offered in the Union at the date of the request for the issuance of the detection order, having been used in the past 12 months and to an appreciable extent, for the solicitation of children. The detection orders concerning the solicitation of children shall apply only to interpersonal communications where one of the users is a child user.deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1016 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8
8. The Coordinating Authority of establishment when requesting the issuance of detection orders, and the competent judicial or independent administrative authority when issuing the detection order, shall target and specify it in such a manner that the negative consequences referred to in paragraph 4, first subparagraph, point (b), remain limited to what is strictly necessary to effectively address the significant risk referred to in point (a) thereof. To that aim, they shall take into account all relevant parameters, including the availability of sufficiently reliable detection technologies in that they limit to the maximum extent possible the rate of errors regarding the detection and their suitability and effectiveness for achieving the objectives of this Regulation, as well as the impact of the measures on the rights of the users affected, and require the taking of the least intrusive measures, in accordance with Article 10, from among several equally effective measures. In particular, they shall ensure that: (a) where that risk is limited to an identifiable part or component of a service, the required measures are only applied in respect of that part or component; (b) where necessary, in particular to limit such negative consequences, effective and proportionate safeguards additional to those listed in Article 10(4), (5) and (6) are provided for; (c) subject to paragraph 9, the period of application remains limited to what is strictly necessary.deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1018 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
The Coordinating Authority of establishment when requesting the issuance of detection orders, and the competent judicial or independent administrative authority when issuing the targeted detection order, shall target and specify it in such a manner that the negative consequences referred to in paragraph 4, first subparagraph, point (b), remain limited to what is strictly necessary to effectively address the significant risk referred to in point (a) thereofeffective and proportionate with regards to the applicable standards of criminal law.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1037 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 1
The competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority shall specify in the targeted detection order the period during which it applies, indicating the start date and the end date.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1040 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
The start date shall be set taking into account the time reasonably required for the provider to take the necessary measures to prepare the execution of the targeted detection order. It shall not be earlier than three months from the date at which the provider received the targeted detection order and not be later than 12 months from that date.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1044 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 3
The period of application of targeted detection orders concerning the dissemination of known or new child sexual abuse material shall not exceed 24 months and that of detection orders concerning the solicitation of children shall not exceed 12 months.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1054 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – title
Additional rules regarding targeted detection orders
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1059 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority shall issue the detection orders referred to in Article 7 using the template set out in Annex I. D. Targeted detection orders shall include at minimum:
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1063 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority shall issue the targeted detection orders referred to in Article 7 using the template set out in Annex I. DTargered detection orders shall include:
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1065 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) information regarding the measures to be taken to execute the detection order, including the indicators to be used and the safeguards to be provided for, including the reporting requirements set pursuant to Article 9(3) and, where applicable, any additional safeguards as referred to in Article 7(8);
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1068 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) identification details of the competent judicial authority or the independent administrative authority issuing the detection order and authentication of the targeted detection order by that judicial or independent administrative authority;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1069 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) (c) the name of the user(s) for whom a targeted detection order has been issued, insofar it is known, and digital aliases in use by the user(s).
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1070 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the specific service in respect of which the targeted detection order is issued and, where applicable, the part or component of the service affected as referred to in Article 7(8);
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1074 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) whether the targeted detection order issued concerns the dissemination of known or new child sexual abuse material or the solicitation of children;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1076 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) the start date and the end date of the targeted detection order;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1078 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) a sufficiently detailed statement of reasonsevidence explaining why the targeted detection order is issued;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1081 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) a reference to this Regulation as the legal basis for the targeted detection order;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1083 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) the date, time stamp and electronic signature of the judicial or independent administrative authority issuing the targeted detection order;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1084 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) easily understandable information about the redress available to the addressee of the targeted detection order, including information about redress to a court and about the time periods applicable to such redress.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1088 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority issuing the targeted detection order shall address it to the main establishment of the provider or, where applicable, to its legal representative designated in accordance with Article 24.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1089 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The targeted detection order shall be transmitted to the provider’s point of contact referred to in Article 23(1), to the Coordinating Authority of establishment and to the EU Centre, through the system established in accordance with Article 39(2).
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1091 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The targeted detection order shall be drafted in the language declared by the provider pursuant to Article 23(3).
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1094 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. If the provider cannot execute the detection order because it contains manifest errors or does not contain sufficient information for its execution, the provider shall, without undue delay, request the necessary clarification to the Coordinating Authority of establishment, using the template set out in Annex II.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1096 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 86 in order to amend Annexes I and I I where necessary to improve the templates in view of relevant technological developments or practical experiences gained.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1101 #
Redress, information, reporting and modification of targeted detection orders
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1106 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of hosting services and providers of interpersonal communications services that have received a targeted detection order, as well as users affected by the measures taken to execute it, shall have a right to effective redress. That right shall include the right to challenge the targeted detection order before the courts of the Member State of the competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority that issued the detection order.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1111 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
When the targeted detection order becomes final, the competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority that issued the targeted detection order shall, without undue delay, transmit a copy thereof to the Coordinating Authority of establishment. The Coordinating Authority of establishment shall then, without undue delay, transmit a copy thereof to all other Coordinating Authorities through the system established in accordance with Article 39(2).
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1112 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of the first subparagraph, a targeted detection order shall become final upon the expiry of the time period for appeal where no appeal has been lodged in accordance with national law or upon confirmation of the targeted detection order following an appeal.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1115 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Where the period of application of the detection order exceeds 12 months, or six months in the case of a detection order concerning the solicitation of children, the Coordinating Authority of establishment shall require the provider to report to it on the execution of the detection order at least once, halfway through the period of application.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1118 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Those reports shall include a detailed description of the measures taken to execute the detection order, including the safeguards provided, and information on the functioning in practice of those measures, in particular on their effectiveness in detecting the dissemination of known or new child sexual abuse material or the solicitation of children, as applicable, and on the consequences of those measures for the rights and legitimate interests of all parties affected.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1120 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
In respect of the targeted detection orders that the competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority issued at its request, the Coordinating Authority of establishment shall, where necessary and in any event following reception of the reports referred to in paragraph 3, assess whether any substantial changes to the grounds for issuing the detection orders occurred and, in particular, whether the conditions of Article 7(4) continue to be met. In that regard, it shall take account of additional mitigation measures that the provider may take to address the significant risk identified at the time of the issuance of the detection orderevidence has been substantiated.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1122 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
That Coordinating Authority shall request to the competent judicial authority or independent administrative authority that issued the detection order the modification or revocation of such order, where necessary in the light of the outcome of that assessment. The provisions of this Section shall apply to such requests, mutatis mutandis.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1131 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of hosting services and providers of interpersonal communication services that have received a targeted detection order shall execute it by installing and operating technologies to detect the dissemination of known or new child sexual abuse material or the solicitation of children, as applicable, using the corresponding indicators provided by the EU Centre in accordance with Article 46 and with Article 6a.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1139 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The provider shall be entitled to acquire, install and operate, free of charge, technologies made available by the EU Centre in accordance with Article 50(1), for the sole purpose of executing the targeted detection order. The provider shall not be required to use any specific technology, including those made available by the EU Centre, as long as the requirements set out in this Article are met. The use of the technologies made available by the EU Centre shall not affect the responsibility of the provider to comply with those requirements and for any decisions it may take in connection to or as a result of the use of the technologies.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1173 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) take all the necessary measures to ensure that the technologies and indicators, as well as the processing of personal data and other data in connection thereto, are used for the sole purpose of detecting the dissemination of known or new child sexual abuse material or the solicitation of children, as applicable, insofar as strictly necessary to execute the targeted detection orders addressed to them;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1186 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) inform the Coordinating Authority, at the latest one month before the start date specified in the targeted detection order, on the implementation of the envisaged measures set out in the implementation plan referred to in Article 7(3);
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1195 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the fact that it operates technologies to detect online child sexual abuse to execute the targeted detection order, the ways in which it operates those technologies and the impact on the confidentiality of users’ communications;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1199 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
The provider shall not provide information to users that may reduce the effectiveness of the measures to execute the targeted detection order, notwithstanding Article 6a and general advice on confidential communication.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1202 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 6
6. Where a provider detects potential online child sexual abuse through the measures taken to execute the targeted detection order, it shall inform the users concerned without undue delay, after Europol or the national law enforcement authority of a Member State that received the report pursuant to Article 48 has confirmed that the information to the users would not interfere with activities for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of child sexual abuse offences.
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1314 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the specific service in respect of which the targeted detection order is issued;
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 1886 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
[...]deleted
2023/07/28
Committee: LIBE