BETA

4 Amendments of Irena JOVEVA related to 2020/2022(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that fundamental rights constitute an objective system of values which ensures that fundamental communication freedoms are not alterable, including by private-law agreements or business terms and conditions; points out that consumer protection, user safety, the option of online anonymity and freedom of speech must be at the core of protecting the fundamental rights; stresses the importance of helping consumers and users take greater control of and responsibility for their own data and identity;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for all proactive protective measures which might at the same time be detrimental to fundamental rights to remain tasks for the State that are subject to thorough judicial review and for no public- authority tasks to be transferred to private- sector firms; stresses the need to comply with the overarching legislative framework, to be subjected to judicial oversight, and not merely left to the discretion of private sector firms; calls for establishing a clear EU-wide framework for content blocking with clear constraints, while promoting transparency on what content is blocked and why; calls for balanced solutions regarding content removals with cooperation between platforms, regulative authorities, fact- checkers and users; stresses that sharing GDPR-compliant data on illegal activity with the law enforcement and other authorities should be a priority for platforms in addition to their own effective and appropriate safeguards;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for recognition of the fact that services developed in the EU which guarantee effective and comprehensive privacy protection and maximum digital freedom represent an advantage in global competition that should not be underestimated, and calls on the Commission to promote their development in a more targeted manner; calls for European values to be upheld in a safe digital environment, promoting diversity of opinion, net neutrality, freedom of speech and access to information; calls for clear, uniform rules, for more platform and advertising industries to apply their principles on platform liability, illegal or harmful content, algorithmic accountability, transparent advertising and fight against dissemination of disinformation, hate speech and fake or bot accounts, to preserve fundamental people rights and freedom;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recognises that the disinformation Code of Practice (CoP) has helped to structure a dialogue with platforms and regulatory bodies; stresses however, that this is not sufficient; calls for mandatory «notice and takedown» orders, requiring that illegal content to be removed from platforms, including certain types of racism and xenophobia from their sites, with fines for non-compliance; calls for uniform and detailed rules for the removal of illegal content, with specific differentiation between illegal content and harmful content on principles of transparency and equal treatment, as well as to prevent removal of content which is not illegal; calls for large social platforms to be obliged to verify flagged content and to reply to uploaders, with a reasoned decision for blocking their content, while preventing abuse of notice services;
2020/04/28
Committee: CULT