6 Amendments of Olivier CHASTEL related to 2020/2143(DEC)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines that the CJEU still overestimates some commitments as stated in the discharge resolution of 2017: for budget lines such as ‘missions for members’, budget line 104: EUR 299.750 committed versus EUR 34 340 paid; ‘missions persons working with institution’, budget line 162: EUR 498 500 committed versus EUR 272 898 paid; ‘training for members’, budget line 106: EUR 270 065 committed versus EUR 164 263 paid; and ‘training persons working with institution’, budget line 1612: EUR 1.528.061 committed versus EUR 706.717 paid; notes, however, that substantial amounts were paid in 2020 from the commitments carried forward; calls on the CJEU to pursue its efforts to ensure sound financial management for all budget lines in order to avoid significant discrepancies between commitments and payments;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for improvements in the context of geographical balance of staff, in particular for management positions, as at presentby mid-2020, 15 out of 58 heads of unit (25,8 %) and 2 out of 15 directors (13,3 %) come from Member States that have joined the Union since May 2004 (compared to 15 out of 57 heads of unit and 2 out of 13 directors in 2018); acknowledges that these figures have to be seen in the context of the percentage of CJEU staff coming from those member states (29 %); calls on the CJEU to strengthen its efforts in this regard;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is concerned that only 46 8,5% of traineeships at the CJEU were paid in 2019; notes, however, that this share rose from 24,1 31,7% in 2018; recognises that 2019 was a transition year towards the gradual introduction of the new regime (CJEU’s decision of 3 December 2018, providing for the possibility of taking on trainees paid by the institutions); notes the estimation that for 2020 the CJEU will remunerate 75 % of its trainees; notes that all traineeships cancelled in the context of the COVID-19- crisis were unpaid traineeships; welcomes the fact that the CJEU foresees the possibility of increasing further the number of paid traineeships, highlights the fact that the possibility of hosting unpaid trainees should only be maintained in the case where such trainees receive payments from other sources, based on inter-institutional agreements signed by the CJEU;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Encourages the CJEU to strengthen its efforts to finalise a general package of measures in relation to the code of conduct for staff; recalls that the last revised code of conduct for members entered into force on 1 January 2017; reiterates the need for detailed provisions related to issues such as conflicts of interest, outside activities, occupational activities after leaving service and gainful employment of spouses; notes that the additional workload owing to the current health situation has delayed the process;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Appreciates that the CJEU is continuously improving its environmental performance by applying Regulation (EC) No 1221/20096 (EMAS III)which requires monitoring of the different environmental aspects based on indicators; welcomes the fact that most of the 2811 indicators, in the form of a ratio per FTE (Full-Time Equivalent), showed a favourable trend in 2019 compared to 2015, the base year of the CJEU’s EMAS system; _________________ 6Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC (EUT L 342 af 22.12.2009, s. 1).
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Welcomes the completion of the third phase of structural reform in 2019, bringing significant structural changes at the General Court, in particular the creation of specialised chambers for intellectual property and staff cases, a greater involvement of the presidents and the vice-president in judicial work, the modernisation of systems for the statistical monitoring of the performance of the chambers and for the mid-term planning of the General Court;