5 Amendments of Christine ANDERSON related to 2020/2216(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that AI shouldmust be used in a fair and ethical manner and with due respect foron the basis of mandatory compliance with Union values and principles, human rights, freedom of expression, the right to privacy, data protection, non- discrimination, media pluralism and cultural diversity;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the crucial importance ofat a coherent vision at Union level may be important in order to achieve a genuine digital single market within an AI-powered society that would must fully benefit users;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Deplores the omission ofAttaches importance to factoring culture frominto AI strategies and policy recommendations at both national and Union level; stresses the need to set uppropose a clear legal framework within Member States that prioritises culture in order to bring the Union, albeit with ratification and implementation of that framework to be under the sole discretion and responsibility of Member States, so that EU Member States can be brought to the forefront of AI-driven innovations and value creation worldwide and to maximise its benefits, while assessinghe benefits of AI are maximised, while at the same time assessing and factoring in its potential risks for society;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that theRecommends that Member States review transposition of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD), into national law is crucial to achieving a genuine digital single market; urges the Member States that have not yet done so to complete the transposition as soon as possible; stresses that the future Digital Services Act (DSA) and any future regulation on AI, with particular regard to the cultural and creative sectors, should be in line with the principles and obligations of the AVMSD particular with regard to compatibility with the right to freedom of expression;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that AI can be an effective dangerous tool for cenfsorcing the rules on online content, such as illegal content or fake news, through automated content filteringfor example where a political decision has been taken to automatically filter content that is declared illegal or declared to be 'fake news', and can also be used to implement the ‘'notice, take down and stay down’' mechanisms; stresses, however, that AI mayought to pose challenges to fundamental rights, in particular freedom of expression, as well as access to information, cultural diversity and media and opinion pluralism;