30 Amendments of Jaak MADISON related to 2020/2111(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
Citation 2
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
Citation 3
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4
Citation 4
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
Citation 5
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
Citation 6
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7
Citation 7
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
Citation 9
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU has a responsibility to act as a global player and adjust its foreign policy in line withEU Member States are contributing supportive assistance to the fight against the COVID-19 crisis, this should not be seen as a global actor's responsibility;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the health and economic scale of the COVID-19 crisis is more than just a burden on the Member States, and this has corresponding consequences at social, health and above all economic level;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. RegretNotes the lack of global leadership anda coordinated international response in the initial phasearly stages of the COVID- 19 crisis, as well as tendencies to opt for isolationist solutions, the withholding of critical information, the rise of authoritarian nationalthe withholding of key information and the lack of response by the EU and its institutions to the crisis; recalls that in the early stages of the COVID 19 crisism, state- sponsored disinformation campaigns and the promotion of false narratives which create distrust and undermine international cooperationthe response and possible solutions were provided solely at national level; in this respect, is sceptical about the self-appointed role of the EU as a "global actor";
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the geopolitical competition and tensions following the COVID- 19 outbreak, and recognises that the European Union still has to position itself in the new world order in which, alongside the EU, the US, China and Russia play a leading roleEU Member States are responding accordingly at the external level to find solutions, including bilaterally, to calm the geopolitical situation; recalls that the main task of the EU should be first and foremost to focus internal European action and crises;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is worried aboutwelcomes the decision of the US to withdraw funding fromto the World Health Organizsation (WHO) and the general tendency of its President to withdraw the US from the multilateral organisations that were created to establish a rules-based world orderunderstands the wish of the US Administration to withdraw from multilateral organisations that they predominantly fund but are not fit for purpose; suggests that EU Member States should do the same;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Acknowledges the need to find a new methodStresses the continued importance of cooperation between the EU and USthe United States, based on mutual respect and a jointcommon agenda toin defend multilateralismce democracy, the rule of law and human rights;
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Urges the Chinese regime to fully cooperate with an independent investigation into the origins of COVID- 19, and calls on the Member States to present a united front towards a rising China, which is leading a crackdown on the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong and has threatened to annex Taiwan; calls on the Member States to advocate Taiwan’s membership of the WHO;
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 342 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5
Subheading 5
Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recognises the global security, socio-economic and political risks that could be caused by the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, and is worried about the fact that the EU’s main international counterparts were prepared to use the crisis to unravel the rules-based world orderuropean Commission attempted to take advantage of the situation by underpminned by multilateral organisationing the Member States;
Amendment 359 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 381 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that only a more unitedn EU, backed up by sufficient and credible military capacities, will be able to conduct a strong foreign policy, and believes that the VP/HR should receive a stronger mandate in speaking on behalf of the EU destabilising actor in international relations;
Amendment 404 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believesis convinced that the end of the unanimity rule on foreign policy would help the EU to conduct a foreign policy that is more effective and more proactivirreparably weaken the sovereignty of Member States and would have as well far-reaching consequences for the external action of Member States; stresses that unanimity on foreign policy issues must have remained in place;
Amendment 417 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines the important role of theMember States' armed forces during the COVID- 19 pandemic and believes that a more in- depth joint operations and effective coordination of mMember sStates’' armed forces within existing frameworks - such as the European Medical Command - or within new frameworks - such as military hospital trains - could lead to greater efficiency and contribute tohelp ensure that the EU’ is preparedness to fight pandemics; recognises the need to review the EU’s security and defence strategies to develop strategic autonomy, to become better prepared and more resilient to the new and hybrid threats and technologies that have made the nature of warfare less conventional and challenge the traditional role of the military, as well as for a future in which Russia and China are becoming more assertive; stresses that the futurestresses that Member States' armed forces should take into account the wider geopolitical implications of COVID-19; is convinced that Member Strategic Compass on security and defence should reflect these developments and take account of the broader geopolitical implications of COVID-19; believes that, given the new political balance and a potential worsening of the international security environment following COVID-19, the EU defence budgets must not be cuts' defence spending must not be reduced in the face of a potentially deteriorating international security environment as a result of COVID-19;
Amendment 446 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for the expansion and modernisation of EU communication strategies so that EU action is sufficiently visible both within and beyond the EU; urges the European External Action Service (EEAS) to further strengthen its capbetween EU Member States to make their acities to counter disinformation, including the creation of a dedicated far- East StratCom Task Force focused on the disinformation emanating from China, and imposing costs on countries that deliberately spread disinformation to divide and harm the EU and its Member Statesons more effective both inside and outside the EU;
Amendment 465 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses that its biggest global consumer market of almost 500 million people gives the EU Member States leverage on the world stage, and believes that a geopolitical Commission should use this leverage when other countries are not prepared to comply with the rule of law or international treatiesis leverage should be utilised in trade negotiations; urges the EU and its Member States to make aid granted to developing countries conditional upon agreements on the effective readmission of all illegal immigrants present in the EU eligible for return;
Amendment 492 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 519 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Underlines the strategic importance of EU engagement and support in its neighbourhood, both in the East and in the South; stresses that the EU must give Western Balkan countries that are not yet part of the EU a fair chance to join the EU, and that the EU must continue its efforts to invest in the regionCOVID-19 pandemic does not provide the excuse for the EU to expand still further, and under no circumstances should the EU admit new members; stresses that Turkey has taken advantage of the pandemic situation to continue its destabilising policies in the Eastern Mediterranean and all accession talks should be discontinued on a permanent basis;
Amendment 536 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Stresses that the COVID-19 crisis could destabilise countries in Africa which often have a fragile health infrastructure and high debts; calls for the EU presence in Africa to be strengthened, for financial assistance and recovery plans to be fostered and for an alternative to Chinese investments to be provided; stresses, however, that priorities should first be set with those EU Member States that are most affected by the COVID crisis; suggests that Member States should provide a coordinated aid and medical personnel to African countries in order to effectively address the COVID 19 crisis in the affected countries; stresses, however, that a new approach to the migration crisis is needed now in order to effectively protect external borders and combat illegal migration, as this could also potentially spread COVID 19 outbreaks in the respective Member States;
Amendment 566 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 577 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Is of the opinionUnderlines that the COVID- 19 crisis has highlighted certain weaknesses of our Union and has shown the urgent need for an effective and efficient Union; believes that the Conference on the Future of Europe will provide a good platform to move forward in constructing more efficient decision making in EU external policies; is therefore determined to start the Conference as soon as possiblestill further the weaknesses in the European Union and believes that these weaknesses are irreconcilable with good governance, and calls on the Member States to halt the long march towards a faux European federal states; underlines the urgent need for a shift of competences towards national decision-making, especially in crisis situations with appropriate coordination at Council level; considers that the Conference on the Future of Europe does not serve a possible reform approach as it does not represent broad public opinion; criticises the fact that the crisis has been used by the EU to push through controversial political agendas which also have an impact at foreign policy level;