62 Amendments of Nathalie LOISEAU related to 2024/0035(COD)
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Research has shown that limiting the dissemination of child sexual abuse material is not only crucial to avoid the re- victimisation linked to the circulation of images and videos of the abuse but is also essential as a form of offender-side prevention, as accessing child sexual abuse material is often the first step towards hands-on abuse, regardless of whether it depicts real or simply realistic abuse and exploitation. The ongoing development of artificial intelligence applications capable of creating realistic images that are indistinguishable from real images, the number of so-called ‘deep-fake’ and AI generated images and videos depicting child sexual abuse is expected to grow exponentially in the coming years. In addition, the development of augmented, extended and virtual reality settings making use of avatars including sensory feedback, e.g. through devices providing a perception of touch are not fully covered by the existing definition. The inclusion of an explicit reference to ‘reproductions and representations’ should ensure that the definition of child sexual abuse material covers these and future technological developments in a sufficiently technology- neutral and hence future-proof way.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) To prevent offences involving the sexual abuse of children, the definition of child sexual abuse material should include so-called ‘paedophile manuals’. Paedophile manuals'instruction manuals on how to sexually abuse children'. 'Instruction manuals on how to sexually abuse children' provide advice on how to find, groom and abuse children and avoid being identified and prosecuted. By lowering barriers and providing the necessary know-how, they contribute to inciting offenders and support the commission of sexual abuse. Their online dissemination has already led certain Member States to amend their criminal law and explicitly criminalise possession and distribution of such manuals. The lack of harmonisation creates an uneven level of protection across the EU.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) In adopting legislation on substantive criminal law, the Union should ensure consistency of such legislation in particular with regard to the level of penalties. This Directive, because it contains an exceptionally high number of different offences, requires, in order to reflect the various degrees of seriousness, a differentiation in the level of penalties which goes further than what should usually be provided in Union legal instruments. The Directive must however ensure that technology-facilitated offences committed are covered by the same penalties as other offences, the seriousness and trauma resulting from them being equivalent.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) Solicitation of children for sexual purposes is a threat with specific characteristics in the context of the Internet, as the latter provides unprecedented anonymity to users because they are able to conceal their real identity and personal characteristics, such as their age. In the last decade, the use of information and communication technologies has provided offenders with increasingly easy access to children, where the contact often starts with the offender luring the child, for example by pretending to be a peer or with other deceitful or flattering conduct, into compromising situations. This increased access to children has led to the rapid growth of phenomena such as ‘sextortion’ (i.e. the conduct of threatening to share intimate material depicting the victim to obtain money, child sexual abuse material or any other benefit), affecting children both below and above the age of sexual consent. There has been a surge in recent years of financially motivated sexual extortion by organised crime groups that target in particular teenage boys, which have led to multiple cases of those children taking their lives. It is therefore essential that all these phenomena are appropriately covered in Member States’s law. At the same time, Member States acknowledge the importance of also combating the solicitation of a child outside the context of the Internet, in particular where such solicitation is not carried out by using information and communication technology. Member States are encouraged toshould criminalise the conduct where the solicitation of a child to meet the offender for sexual purposes takes place in the presence or proximity of the child, for instance in the form of a particular preparatory offence, attempt to commit the offences referred to in this Directive or as a particular form of sexual abuse. Whichever legal solution is chosen to criminalise ‘off-line grooming’, Member States should ensure that they prosecute the perpetrators of such offences.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) This Directive does not govern Member States’ policies with regard to consensual sexual activities in which children may be involved and which can be regarded as the normal discovery of sexuality in the course of human development, taking account of the different cultural and legal traditions and of new forms of establishing and maintaining relations among children and adolescents, including through information and communication technologies. Member States which avail themselvesAmong others, the United Nations Committee ofn the possibilities referred to in this Directive do so in the exercise of their competences. More particularly, Member States should be able to exempt from criminalisation consensual sexual activities involving exclusively children above the age of sexual consent, as well asRights of the Child and the Lanzarote Committee have stated that consensual activities between peers who are close in age, maturity and development for consensual and non-exploitative sexual activity should not be criminalised provided that there is no element of coercion, abuse of trust or dependency between the them. Accordingly, Member States should protect children from criminalisation for consensual sexual activities involving peers. The amendments to that Article are intended to clarify the scope of the derogation, in light of the fact that some Member States appear to have interpreted its original wording too broadly (e.g. by exempting from criminalisation consensual activities between minors above the age of consent and adults of any age, considered to be ‘peers’ despite a significant age difference). This means that only consensual activities between peers who are close in age, maturity and development should be protected from criminalisation. The provisions related to age of consent should not be interpreted in limiting in any manner the criminalisation of child sexual abuse and exploitation of children who have reached and are above the age of consent as no child can consent to their sexual abuse.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) Victims of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children are often unable to report the crime for several decades after its commission due to the shame, guilt and self-blame, which can be related, among others, to the social and cultural stigma that still surround sexual abuse, the secrecy in which the abuse takes place, threatening or blaming conduct by the perpetrator, and/or trauma. Due to children’s specific vulnerabilities and developmental limitations, they may not fully grasp that what occurred was abusive, especially if the abuser was a trusted adult. It may take reaching adulthood for survivors to develop the emotional maturity to recognize the abuse for what it was and understand its long-term effects. Trauma can cause victims to repress or block out the memories as a protective measure for years. Perpetrators of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, unlike perpetrators of other violent crimes, tend to remain active until old age, continuing to pose a threat to children. In light of this, effective investigation and prosecution of offences involving sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children, as well as appropriate victims’ assistance and support, can only be provided if statutes of limitations allow victims to re abolished. Therepforte, the crime for a significantly extended period of time.minimum standards provided in the Directive should be interpreted as a first step towards abolition
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31 a (new)
Recital 31 a (new)
(31 a) At least two-thirds of victims of child sexual abuse and exploitation are girls; Crimes in the area of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children against girls are forms of violence against women as per article 2.a of Directive (EU) 2024/1385 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on combating violence against women and domestic violence, which shall be applicable. Consequently, when implementing the Directive at hand, a gender sensitive approach shall be applied.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) Measures to protect child victims in a comprehensive manner should be adopted in their best interest, taking into account an assessment of their needs. Effective child protection requires a whole of society approach. With the child at the centre, all relevant authorities and services should work together to protect and support the child, in their best interests. The “Barnahus” model of providing a child-friendly environment staffed with specialists from all relevant disciplines is currently the most advanced example of a child-friendly approach to justice and to avoiding revictimisation. The relevant provisions of this Directive are built on the principles of that model. That model aims to ensure that all children involved in child abuse or child sexual exploitation investigations benefit from a high-quality assessment in child-friendly settings, appropriate psychosocial support and child protective services. This Directive attempts to ensurequires that all Member States uphold these principles and establish age-appropriate multidisciplinary and interagency structures to provide care and legal support to victims under one roof, although it does not require the Member States to follow the Barnahus model as such. Where medical examinations of the child are necessary for the purposes of the criminal investigations, for example to gather evidence of abuse, these should be limited to the strictly necessary in order to limit retraumatisation. This obligation should not prevent other medical examinations necessary for the well-being of the child. All children who are likely to be, for whatever reason and in whatever capacity, brought into contact with criminal, civil or administrative justice systems should have easy access to child friendly justice. Child-friendly justice refers to justice systems which guarantee the respect and the effective implementation of all children’s rights at the highest attainable level and giving due consideration to the child’s level of maturity and understanding and the circumstances of the case. It is of particular importance that justice is accessible, age appropriate, speedy, diligent, adapted to and focused on the needs and rights of the child, respecting the rights of the child including the rights to due process, to participate in and to understand the proceedings, to respect for private and family life and to integrity and dignity. Child victims should have easy access to child friendly justice, legal remedies and measures to address conflicts of interest where sexual abuse or sexual exploitation of a child occurs within the family. When a special representative should be appointed for a child during a criminal investigation or proceeding, this role may be also carried out by a legal person, an institution or an authority. Moreover, child victims should be protected from penalties, for example under national legislation on prostitution, if they bring their case to the attention of competent authorities. Furthermore, participation in criminal proceedings by child victims should not cause additional trauma to the extent possible, as a result of interviews or visual contact with offenders. All authorities involved in the proceedingsprofessionals who come into contact with children in the justice system should be trained in child friendly justice. A good understanding of children and how they behave when faced with traumatic experiences will help to ensure a high quality of evidence-taking and also reduce the stress placed on children when carrying out the necessary measures. Where child victimsren participate in criminal proceedings, the court should take full account of their age and maturity in conducting the proceedings and should ensure that the proceedings are accessible and understandable to the child. The court should prioritize the child's right to participate meaningfully, ensuring that their views are heard and respected throughout the process.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 39
Recital 39
(39) Directive 2012/29/EU establishes a set of victims’ rights in criminal proceedings, including the right to protection and the right to receive a decision on compensation from the offender and any organisation liable for child sexual abuse and exploitation. The proposal for the revision of the Victims’ Rights Directive provides for targeted amendments to all victims’ rights. In addition to the rights established under that Directive, child victims of sexual abuse, sexual exploitation and child sexual abuse material should be given access to legal counselling and, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice systems, to legal representation, including for the purpose of claiming compensation. Such legal counselling and legal representation could also be provided by the competent authorities for the purpose of claiming compensation from the Statein criminal and civil proceedings. The purpose of legal counselling is to enable victims to be informed and receive advice about the various possibilities open to them. Legal counselling should be provided by a person having received appropriate legal training without necessarily being a lawyer. Legal counselling and, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice systems, legal representation should be provided free of charge, at least when the victim does not have sufficient financial resources, in a manner consistent with the internal procedures of Member States.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
(a) any material that visually depictsrepresentation, by whatever means, of a child or any part of the body of a child engaged in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct;
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
(b) depictionAny representation, by whatever means of the sexual organparts of a child for primarily sexual purposes;
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point c
(c) aAny material that visually depictsrepresentation, by whatever means, of any person appearing to be a child engaged in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct or any depiction of the sexual organparts of any person appearing to be a child, for primarily sexual purposes;
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point d
(d) Any realistic images , reproductions or representations of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct or of the sexual organparts of a child, for primarily sexual purposes;
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4
(4) ‘child exploitation in prostitution’' means the use of a child for sexual activities where money or any other form of remuneration, gain, advantage, benefit or consideration is given or promised as payment in exchange for the child engaging in sexual activities, regardless of whether that payment, promise, gain, advantage, benefit or consideration is made to the child or to a third party;
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
(b) the sexual organparts of a child for primarily sexual purposes;
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
(5 a) ‘sexual extortion of children’ means the conduct of threatening to share intimate material depicting the child victim to obtain money, child sexual abuse material or any other benefit under the threat of sharing the material beyond the consent of the depicted person;
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
(7 a) 'information and communication technology’ means any technological tool and resource used to digitally store, create, share or exchange information, including smart phones, computers, social networking and other media applications and services;
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
(8) ‘peers’ means persons who are close in age and degree of psychological and physical development orand maturity.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 7 – point a a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 7 – point a a (new)
(a a) causing a child below the age of sexual consent to engage themselves, in any act of vaginal, anal or oral penetration of a sexual nature, with any bodily part or object;
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 8
Article 3 – paragraph 8
8. Where the child is above the age of sexual consent and does not consent to the act, the conduct referred to in paragraph 7 shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 102 years.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 9 – point a
Article 3 – paragraph 9 – point a
(a) a non-consensual act is understood as an act which is performed without the child’s consent given clearly and voluntarily, as a result of the child’s free will assessed in the context of the surrounding circumstances, or where the child is unable to form a free will due to the presence of circumstances referred to in paragraph 5, or due to other circumstances, including the child’s physical or mental condition such as a state of unconsciousness, intoxication, freezing, illness or bodily injury;
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 9 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 9 – point c
(c) the absence of consent cannot be refuted exclusively by the child’s silence, verbal or physical non-resistance or past sexual conduct.
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Coercing or forcing a child to share intimate material depicting the child to obtain money, child sexual abuse material or any other benefit under the threat of sharing the material beyond the consent of the depicted person shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 8 years.
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Acquisition or possession of child sexual abuse material shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 12 years.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Knowingly obtaining access, including by means of information and communication technology, to child sexual abuse material shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 12 years.
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. Production of child sexual abuse material shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 38 years.
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 8 – point a a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 8 – point a a (new)
a a. promptly notify and request online service providers to remove reported illegal material hosted on their platform;
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 9
Article 5 – paragraph 9
9. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whetherMember States shall ensure that this Article applies to cases involving child sexual abuse material as referred to in Article 2 , point (36)(c) , where the person appearing to be a child was in fact 18 years of age or older at the time of depiction.
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
Article5a Instructions manuals on how to commit the offences listed in Articles 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional conduct, when committed without right, referred to in paragraphs 2 to 6 is punishable. 2. Acquisition or possession of instructions manual on how to sexually abuse children shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 2 years. 3. Knowingly obtaining access, including by means of information and communication technology, to instructions manual on how to sexually abuse children shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment at least 2 years. 4. Distribution, dissemination or transmission of child sexual abuse material and instructions manual on how to sexually abuse children shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment at least 2 years. 5. Offering, supplying or making available child sexual abuse material and instructions manual on how to sexually abuse children shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment at least 2 years. 6. Production of child sexual abuse material and instructions manual on how to sexually abuse children shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment at least 8 years.
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) proposing , including by means of information and communication technology, to meetestablish a relationship with a child either online or in person , for the purpose of committing any of the offences referred to in Article 3(4) , (5), (6) and (7) andArticle 4, Article 5(6) and Article 7, where that proposal was followed by material acts leading to such a meetingoffences, shall be punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 1 year;
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) The conduct referred to in the first subparagraph does not cover consensual relationships between peers who are close in age and degree of psychological and physical development and maturity, provided that there is no element of coercion, abuse of trust or dependency between the peer;
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an attempt, including by means of information and communication technology, to commit the offences provided for in Article 5(2) and (3) by an adult soliciting a child to provide child sexual abuse material is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 6 months .
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an attempt, including by means of information and communication technology, to commit the offences provided for in Article 4(2) and (5) by an adult causing a child to participate in child sexual abuse performances and exploitation in prostitution is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 6 months.
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Member States shall ensure that law enforcement authorities promptly investigate attempts of solicitation of children for sexual purposes. Member States shall ensure that victims of such solicitation attempts are effectively referred to relevant support services for assistance and protection.
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – title
Article 7 – title
Solicitation of child sexual abuse and exploitation
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that intentionally promising or giving any third person money, or other form of remuneration or consideration, including by means of information and communication technology, to cause themis person to commit any of the offences listed in Article 3(4), (5),(6), (7), and (8), Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 5(6) is punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 3 years.
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 10 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Member States should ensure that peers are protected from prosecution for consensual and non-exploitative sexual activity, provided that there is no element of coercion, abuse of trust or dependency between the peers;
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whetherMember States shall ensure that Article 3(2), (4) and (4)7) do not apply to consensual sexual activities between peers, in so far as the acts did not involve any abuseprovided that there is no element of coercion, abuse of trust or dependency between the peers.
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. It shall be within the discretion of Member States to decide whetherMember States shall ensure that Article 4(4) does not appliesy to a performance that takes place in the context of a consensual relationship where the child has reached the age of sexual consent or between peers , in so far as the acts did not involve any abuse or exploitation and no money or other form of remuneration or consideration is given as payment in exchange for the performance.
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
For the purpose of paragraphs 1 to 4, a child above the age of sexual consent can be considered as having consented to an activity only where the consent was given clearly and voluntarily, as result of the child’s free will assessed in the context of the surrounding circumstances.
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 3
The absence of consent cannot be refuted exclusively by the child’s silence, verbal or physical non-resistance or past conduct.
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) the offence involved serious violence or caused serious physical or psychological harm to the child ;
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the offence or another criminal offence of child sexual abuse or sexual exploitation was committed repeatedly;
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(j a) the offence was committed due to a motive based on one or more than one grounds protected under Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and resulted in either a direct or an indirect discrimination, prohibited under EU law.
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. In order to avoid the risk of repetition of offences, Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a natural person who has been convicted of any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 mayshall be temporarily or permanently prevented from exercising at least professional activities involvn organised voluntary activities involving or facilitating direct and regular contacts with children.
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that any employers, when recruiting a person, including staff, consultants and volunteers, for professional or organised voluntary activities involving or facilitating direct and regular contacts with children, and organisations acting in the public interest against child sexual abuse, when recruiting staffa person, are required to request information in accordance with national law by way of any appropriate means, such as access upon request or via the person concerned, of the existence of criminal convictions for any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 , entered in the criminal record or of the existence of any disqualification from exercising activities involving direct and regular contacts with children arising from those criminal convictions.
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) at least 240 years from the date the victim has reached the age of majority for the offences punishable under this Directive by a maximum penalty of at least 3 years of imprisonment;
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point c
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. The period of time referred to in the second subparagraph shall be interrupted by any act initiating the judicial proceedings or any subsequent proceedings for offences listed in paragraph 2 first subparagraph conducted against the same offender.
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. If the offender commits another offence listed in paragraph 2 first subparagraph before the expiry of the limitation period, the limitation period of the initial offence is prolonged until the the date on which the limitation period for the new offence expires.
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 17 – paragraph 3
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that at leastll professionals and volunteers working in close contact with children in the child protection, education, childcare and health care sectors are obliged to report to the competent authorities if they have reasonable grounds for believing that an offence punishable under this Directive has been committed or is likely to be committed.
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 21 – paragraph 3
Article 21 – paragraph 3
3. Where it is necessary to provide for interim accommodation, children shall, as a priority, be placMember States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the need for and the type of interim accommodation is assessed with other family members, where necessary best in temporary or permanent housing, equipped with support servicesrest of the child as primary consideration.
Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) at least 240 years from the date the victim has reached the age of majority for the offences punishable under this Directive by a maximum penalty of at least 3 years;
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – point c
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall develop national action plan to prevent and tackle child sexual abuse and exploitation. Member States shall take appropriate actions, including through the Internet, such as information and awareness-raising campaigns, research, education and training programmes or material on how to identify, prevent and report child sexual abuse and exploitation, where appropriate in cooperation with relevant civil society organisations and other stakeholders, aimed at raising awareness and reducing the risk of children, becoming victims of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation. Member States should integrate sexual education, digital literacy and safe online practices in school curriculum and promoted in communities.
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – title
Article 30 – title
Measures against websites containing or disseminating child sexual abuse material and instructions manuals on how to sexually abuse children
Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure the prompt removal of web pages containing or disseminating child sexual abuse material hosted in their territory and to endeavour to obtain the removal of such pages hosted outside of their territory. ‘Prompt removal’ means that the content must be removed within 24 hours of being notified.
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that online service providers who fail to remove the content promptly, as outlined in paragraph 1, is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, which may include criminal or non- criminal fines or other sanctions, such as listed in Article 14 (1).
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Member States shall require online service providers: (a) to provide information about competent national support services and reporting mechanisms; (b) to report to the competent child protection service any child victim of offences referred to in Articles 3 to 9 who they know about or suspects, in good faith, to have been committed.
Amendment 738 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may take measures to promptly block access to web pages containing or disseminating child sexual abuse material towards the Internet users within their territory. These measures must be set by transparent procedures and provide adequate safeguards, in particular to ensure that the restriction is limited to what is necessary and proportionate, and that users are informed of the reason for the restriction. Those safeguards shall also include the possibility of judicial redress. For the purpose of paragraph 1, ‘prompt removal’ means that the content must be blocked within 24 hours of being notified.