Activities of Salima YENBOU related to 2019/2194(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Achieving an effective policy legacy for the European Year of Cultural Heritage (debate)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on achieving an effective policy legacy for the European Year of Cultural Heritage
Amendments (19)
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 47 a (new)
Citation 47 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 11 September 2018 on language equality in the digital age,
Amendment 6 #
- having regard to its resolution of 13 November 2018 on minimum standards for minorities in the EU,
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 47 c (new)
Citation 47 c (new)
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education on endangered European languages and linguistic diversity in the European Union (A7-0239 / 2013),
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that Europeanall the languages spoken in Europe enable and promote the richness and diversity of European cultural heritage, as mother tongues are alsovectors of values and knowledge which are often used to transmit intangible cultural heritage; urges the Commission and the Member States to take greater action to protect and strengthen language diversity in the digital age;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Regrets the fact that communication work about the European Heritage Label has not yet been sufficiently developed - it constitutes not only a mark of recognition for a place or a project, but also its link with the theme of European citizenship; would like places that have already been awarded the Label to be promoted and to be granted a substantive follow-up and also logistical support;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the European Union and the Member States to be more alert to the extreme threat facing many European languages classified as endangered and to commit wholeheartedly to the protection and promotion of the exceptional diversity of the Union's linguistic and cultural heritage by deploying ambitious revitalisation policies for the languages concerned and setting aside a reasonable budget for this purpose; recommends that these policies should also aim at developing a broader awareness among EU citizens of the linguistic and cultural richness these communities represent; encourages Member States to draw up action plans on the basis of shared good practices which already exist within a number of linguistic communities in Europe;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Reminds the Commission and the Member States of the need to fully include the cultural heritage of the minorities present in Europe in any reflection on the European heritage by committing themselves to recognising and promoting their contribution to the cultural, linguistic and artistic wealth and diversity of the Union and endeavouring to establish and implement concerted and coordinated measures for the sustainable management and promotion of these cultures;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of all types of education – formal, non-formal and informal – relating to history and cultural heritage, at all ages; reiterates the significance of including art,ll artistic forms, including music, film and theatre, design and architecture in school curricula or in curriculum support activities at all levels of study;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the House of European History shouldmust be provided with the financial means necessary to fully play its role as a gateway for all sections of the public to understand the common history of the countries of the European Union, so that it becomes a knowledge and collaboration hub for young researchers from across the EU;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Expresses its concern about the lack of skilled craftspeople, restoration professionals and heritage experts, a situation which is putting European heritage at risk; the diversity of the preserved, maintained and promoted heritage at risk; urges the Member States also to develop practical learning cycles for heritage professions, by allowing the mobility of apprentices or students, and their teachers, to be developed in particular within the new Erasmus programme;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Reiterates the need to improve socio-economic and labour conditions and gender balance and to promote mobility opportunities for different specialists employed in the cultural heritage sector;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the importaurgencey of digitising cultural material so as not only to preserve it for future generations (the storing function), but to also make it more easily accessible to a larger audience by bringing cultural heritage online, using open source software capable of being read and transferred throughout Europe and of being used with a horizon extending beyond a few years;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Recalls the potential for digitising the cultural heritage so as not only to preserve it for future generations (the storage function), but to also make it more easily accessible to a broader public by bringing it online; encourages the Commission and the Member States to fully develop this potential as a source of education, research opportunities, job creation, better social inclusion, better access for persons with disabilities or living in inaccessible areas, and sustainable economic development;
Amendment 91 #
11a. Welcomes the recent changes concerning the EUROPEANA project and stresses the importance of continuing joint work to develop this unique platform for making available the collections of national libraries and museums. Calls for greater efforts to make it a platform known to the general public, and to ensure sustainable funding;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Recognises the importance of exploiting the cultural heritage in digital form to allow access to places and works for all, in particular persons with disabilities or who are disadvantaged; wishes in this regard to see collaboration between places of historical significance and of heritage protection and museums in order to develop systems recognised and used throughout the European Union;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises that the cultural heritage sector’s contributiones to economic development is, with noteworthy, with spillover effects in other economic sectors; notes that over 300 000 people in Europe are employed in the cultural heritage sector, while 7.8 million jobs in Europe are indirectly linked to it51; _________________ 51 http://blogs.encatc.org/culturalheritagecoun tsforeurope/wp- content/uploads/2015/06/CHCfE_FULL- REPORT_v2.pdf.
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Recognises the essential role played by the European Capitals of Culture in the promotion of cities and regions, which, by building an economic framework around their cultural, artistic and social projects, integrate the notions of sustainable tourism and enhance their tangible and intangible heritage, traditions and innovations, for the benefit and appreciation of all European citizens and citizens beyond Europe’s borders;
Amendment 122 #
19a. Stresses the need for action to limit the consequences for the cultural heritage of climate change and natural disasters; calls, in this regard, for appropriate prevention and adaptation measures to be determined and for knowledge-sharing between the Member States to be improved;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates that the illicit trafficking of cultural artefacts is a serious issue with a global dimension that requires coordinated action not only among Member States, but also at international level; points out that any reflection on Europe’s heritage must also take a fresh look at works that have been looted and stolen during wars and the waves of colonisation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to work in a coordinated manner to facilitate the restitution of cultural goods which have been unlawfully removed from their country of origin;