Activities of Beata KEMPA related to 2021/2103(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on the shrinking space for civil society in Europe
Amendments (19)
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas civil society organisations (CSOs) are non-profit making organisations independent of public institutions and commercial interests, whose activities should contribute to the realisation of EU values and fundamental rights; whereas human rights defenders, activists and informal groups are also key actors in civil society;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas freedom of thought and freedom of expression, including online, are the cornerstone of every free and democratic society;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas in some Member States, restrictions have been imposed with the deliberate aim of limiting civic space and are accompanied by legal, administrative and fiscal harassment, criminalisation and negative rhetoric aimed at stigmatising and delegitimising CSOs and draining their capacity to carry out their legitimate work; whereas hate speech, harassment and attacks also emanate from non-state actors; whereas CSOs working on women’s rights, including sexual and reproductive health and rights, environmental issues and the protection of minorities and LGBTI rights, as well as those providing assistance to asylum seekers and those involved in search and rescue operations, are particularly exposed;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Asserts the crucialimportant role played by CSOs in the realisation of EU values and fundamental rights, and the implementation of EU policies and strategies; stresses their keyimportant contribution to informed public debate, articulating aspirations present in society, giving a voice to vulnerable and marginalised people, providing expertise in policy-making, promoting active citizenship and acting as schools of democracy;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomNotes the Commission’s acknowledgement of the importance of civil society in a number of EU policies and strategies; stresses, however, that the fragmented nature of this approach results in little effective improvement of the situation of CSOs on the ground;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Member States to limit peaceful assemblies only if strictly necessary and in a proportionate way; condemns any unnecessary use of force against protesters, as well as their criminalisation and surveillance; calls on the Commission to issue guidelines for the protection of freedom of peaceful assembly;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Points out that during the pandemic, a significant proportion of civil society activities have moved online; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure full freedom of expression, including on online social networks in particular;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Warns against the detrimental impact of policies and rhetoric instilling a chilling effect on civic space; urges the Commission to make the analysis of chilling effects a key aspect of its annual rule of law report, to build on case C- 78/1810to challenge measures having a chilling effect on the exercise of Charter rights when similar approaches are possible and to apply for interim measures to avoid irreparable damage while judicial review is ongoing; _________________ 10 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2020, European Commission v Hungary, C-78/18, EU:C:2020:476.
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. WelcomesTakes note of the adoption with an increased budget of the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme; calls on the Commission to actively consult CSOs in the definition of work programmes and funding mechanisms so as to ensure transparency, flexibility and user- friendliness; welcomes re-granting mechanisms in the Union Values strand;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Condemns attempts by certain Member States to impose limitations on foreign funding and the related political narratives they have promulgated and measures they have taken with the aim of stigmatising CSOs; calls on the Member States to be fully transparent in disclosing the sources of funding for CSOs;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Regrets that civil dialogue often remains an ad hoc process; calls on the Member States to develop coherent policy frameworks that ensure structured, predictable and long-term processes, inclusive participation and systematic review; calls on the Commission to provide recommendations based on the analysis of existing practices;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24