7 Amendments of Elżbieta KRUK related to 2022/0219(COD)
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Reinforcing the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) throughout the Union should therefore be at the core of those efforts. Indeed difficulties and gaps still exist and the European defence industrial base remains highlycapabilities remain fragmented, lacking sufficient collaborative action and inter- operability of products.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) The current geopolitical situation in the Eastern neighbourhood of the Union has shown that, whereas the duplication of efforts should be avoided, a diversified defence market can contribute to the variety of products immediately available on the market and can therefore be beneficial to an adequate satisfaction of Member States’ urgent needs.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) FurthermoreNevertheless, efforts should be made so that the increased spending results in a much stronger European Defence Technological and Industrial Base. Indeed, without coordination andDTIB throughout the Union. Closer cooperation, together withe increased national investments, are likely to deepen the fragmentation of the European defence industrystrengthen the European defence capabilities as well as increase global competitiveness and efficiency of the defence industry across the Union.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) In the light of the above challenges and the related structural changes in the EU Defence industry, it appears necessary to speed up the adjustment of the European Defence Technological and Industrial BaseDTIB, enhance its competitiveness and efficiency, and thereby contribute to strengthening and reforming Member States’ defence industrial capabilities. Addressing industrial shortfalls throughout the Union should include promptly tackling the most urgent gaps.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Common investment and defence procurement should in particular be incentivised, as such collaborative actions would ensure that the necessary changes in the EU industrial base takes place in a collaborative manner, avoiding further fragmentation of the industry.
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Grants under the Instrument mayshould take the form of financing not linked to cost based on the achievement of results by reference to work packages, milestones or targets of the common procurement process, in order to create the necessary incentive effect.
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to foster cooperation in defence procurement process between participating Member States in order to contributinge to solidarity, interoperability, and prevention of crowding- out effects, avoiding fragmentation and increasings well as to reduce fragmentation, when it is not beneficial for the competition and diversity of products available on the European defence market, and to increase the effectiveness of public spending.