Activities of Elżbieta RAFALSKA related to 2022/2046(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
POSITION IN THE FORM OF AMENDMENTS on upscaling the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework: a resilient EU budget fit for new challenges
Amendments (7)
Amendment 14 #
Draft report
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights that, in the short term, large-scale humanitarian aid in Ukraine and financial support to Member States receiving and helping to settle people fleeing the conflict are needed to address the impact of the war against Ukraine;
Amendment 25 #
Draft report
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 37 #
Draft report
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its position that the Social Climate Fund must be fully incorporated into the EU budget and within the MFF without negatively impacting other programmes and funds under this heading, bearing in mind the importance of ensuring food security and delivering onprovided that there is an automatic MFF adjustment mechanism so that SCF budget is fully dynamic and reflects the Greven Deal; calls for the ceiling of Heading 3 to be adjusted accordinglyues from auctioned allowance;
Amendment 41 #
Draft report
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Emphasises that the war against Ukraine has placed unexpected demands on the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Border Management and Visa Instrument (BMVI) and the decentralised agencies in Heading 4; expresses further concern, furthermore, that successive Commission proposals for agency mandate extensions are eroding the BMVI’s financial envelope; calls for the ceiling of Heading 4 to be increased significantly to reflect the real financing needs of the Union’s migration and border management;
Amendment 42 #
Draft report
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Deplores the fact that, even prior to the war against Ukraine, funds available under Heading 6 were woefully inadequate and that pressure has since increased substantially; underlines that the continued funding for the needs of refugees from Syria, Iraq and other countries was not factored into the MFF or NDICI-Global Europe negotiations and should therefore have been financed by fresh appropriations with a corresponding increase in the ceiling of Heading 6; highlights that, owing to the risk of default on MFA loans provided to Ukraine, a, also to strengthen Instrument faor higher rate of provisioning than the standard 9 % is likely to be required as further loans are rolled outPre- Accession given the new candidate countries; underlines that additional needs in Ukraine must not lead to money being diverted away from other geographic regions in need; insists, therefore, on an increase in the ceiling for Heading 6 to fully cover the current and projected future needs of the Union’s external action, which have dramatically increased both in neighbouring countries and worldwide as a result of the food, energy and economic crises;
Amendment 43 #
Draft report
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Points out that MFF and own resources are interlinked; emphasises, in this context, the need for sustainable and resilient and non-regressive revenue for the EU budget; recalls that, in the IIA, Parliament, the Council and the Commission committed to introducing sufficient new own resources to at least cover the repayment of EURI debt;
Amendment 44 #
Draft report
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Underlines that the temporary and short-term flexibility introduced into cohesion policy funds through the series of Cohesion’s Action for Refugees in Europe (CARE) proposals provided some helped to Member States to deal quickly with the impact of the war against Ukraine, but for some Member States still insufficient for the scale of needs, following on from the model of the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiatives, CRII and CRII+, which enabled EU action at the beginning of the COVID- 19 pandemic;