4 Amendments of Karen MELCHIOR related to 2020/2015(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the potential that AI has to deliver innovative services to businesses, consumers and the public sector; underlines that the development and use of AI in the internal market will depend onbenefit from a balanced and effective system of intellectual property rights (IPRs);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that disruptive technologies such as AI offer both small and large companies the opportunity to develop market-leading products; considers that all companies shouldcan benefit from equally efficient and effective IPR protection;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that where AI applications are certified, they should demonstrate transparency, explainability and adherence to ethical standards, but notes that this aim isheir adherence to ethical standards, their processes need to be transparent, and their decisions should be explainable to the extent possible, but notes that these objectives are not necessarily achieved only, or at all,solely through simple disclosure of the algorithm or code;