4 Amendments of Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN related to 2022/2134(DEC)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Recalls that the agencies are the most qualified at assessing the use of resources and play a crucial role in supporting the right sustainable projects in line with the European Green Deal; calls on the Commission to ensure funding supporting the EU agencies in securing the social dialogue; notes that EU agencies have a crucial role in securing social dialogue with the EU institutions;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Recalls that gender balance must be ensured within the Union agencies in accordance with the basic regulations establishing them; asks, therefore, that the Union agencies collect and present data on gender balance for all categories of management staff (from the lowest to the highest level) to gather the basic data on the basis of which the Union agencies are encouraged to address gender imbalance in management and to pursue gender mainstreaming in all fields;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Highlights that transparency and citizens' awareness of the existence of the agencies are essential for their democratic accountability;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Welcomes that 9 agencies had introduced their own internal rules to deal with the lack of provisions in EU legislation governing the activities of members of agencies’ boards; notes with concern that the remaining 31 agencies only take into account potential ‘revolving door’ cases concerning their current and former staff, leading to only a small fraction of potential ‘revolving door’ cases of agencies’ board members being subject to any assessment; is concerned that during the period 2019-2021 only 20 of the 40 agencies examined by ECA had considered any potential revolving-door cases related to their senior staff members; calls on agencies to urgently introduce internal rules for members of their boards on conflicts of interest in general and ‘revolving door’ situations in particular;