10 Amendments of Gilles BOYER related to 2024/2055(INI)
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes thatCalls for detailed analysis of the creaoption of a separate jurisdiction for EU banks with substantial cross-border operations13 in order to be able to accurately assess to what extent it would help to complete the BU; _________________ 13 Draghi report, p. 61.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the adoption by co- legislators of the new banking package implementing Basel III standards in the EU; underlines the continued lack of clarity concerning implementation of the Basel III standards in some other jurisdictions and the risk of international level playing field issues that this could create; stresses that the Commission should evaluate thoroughly whether a delay in implementation is necessary to maintain the competitiveness of EU banks; welcomes, in this regard, the delegated act postponing the date of application of the new market risk framework by one year to 1 January 2026;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that, already within the existing regulatory framework, the banking sector has shown its resilience during the market events of recent years, and that the average Common Equity Tier 1 ratio has remained at high levels, at 15.81 %;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the need to enhance the resilience of non-bank financial intermediaries and establish a level playing field with the banking sector, including by designing specific regulatory and supervisory tools to prevent a liquidity crisis;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the objective of the proposal on crisis management and deposit insurance of ensuring a more consistent approach across all Member States to the application of resolution tools and deposit protection to enhance financial stability, taxpayer protection and depositor confidence; notes that small banks do not pose any risks to financial stability;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Recalls that a sufficient minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities is crucial for a credible resolution framework and for ensuring that resolution authorities have sufficient flexibility to effectively apply the resolution strategies needed in a specific crisis situation; warns that reductions in this minimum requirement, resulting from specific resolution strategies in the resolution planning phase, could hamper the resolvability of banks;
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that national deposit guarantee schemes have been introduced successfully and have proved their functionality in a number of cases; underlines the need to take specific national characteristics into account and to preserve the well-functioning systemsconsiders that the introduction of a European Deposit Insurance Scheme should lead to a reduction of risk for smaller banks that are already in place in some Member Stateswithin the Banking Union; underlines that the contributions to a European Deposit Insurance Scheme should take into account the risk profile of each participating sector;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Recalls that breaking the link between bank and sovereign risk remains a challenge for the BU; emphasises that the risk on banks’ balance sheets can be reduced further through the regulatory treatment ofe need to find ways to further diversify banks’ sovereign exposures going forward;