4 Amendments of Stéphanie YON-COURTIN related to 2020/2017(INI)
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sectoruses of certain AI applications in the education sector that are subject to certification schemes or include sensitive personal data in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stressesmaking full use of the public procurement directives and to train public buyers adequately, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights for the procurement of such services in the public sector; stresses to that effect the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non- discrimination and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removingat, in line with existing legal provisions, technologies using artificial intelligence can be a relevant and efficient tool in the fight against illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared; calls for a ban on generalised moderation and automated content filter; stresses that these technologies must be used in a proportionate manner, with safeguards, and ensure the respect of fundamental rights;