4 Amendments of Stéphanie YON-COURTIN related to 2020/2175(DEC)
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Acknowledges that the composition of the Board of Supervisors seems appropriate to deal with the EIOPA’s rulemaking responsibilities, but less so for their supervisory roles; Reiterates its concern that national supervisors have a decisive say in the Authority’s main governing body, which means that they are in a position to decide the scope of the Authority’s action to review their own effectiveness (peer reviews); stresses that the lack of resources prevents the Authority from fulfilling its duties independently from member states4a; _________________ 4aSee special report of the Court of auditors: “In all its activities, EIOPA relies largely on co-operation with NCAs [national comepetent authorities], but it does not always receive their full support.(...) With only 20 staff members working on oversight issues and a further seven on related topics, EIOPA is faced with a real challenge in terms of carrying out the broad range of complex tasks for which it is responsible”https://www.eca.europa.eu/Li sts/ECADocuments/SR18_29/SR_EIOPA _EN.pdf
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. calls on the Authority to draw inspiration from the publication by the ECB's Ethics Committee of its opinions on cases of conflict of interest and post- mandate gainful employment, in order to increase transparency on potential conflicts of interest and on post-mandate gainful employment;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Calls on the Authority to draw inspiration from the ECB's initiatives to propose internal programmes for the promotion of women and for greater diversity among its staff;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Welcomes the Authority's intention to publish a short list consisting of at least one woman and one man for nomination as its Chair;