124 Amendments of Francisco GUERREIRO related to 2022/0278(COD)
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Past crises, especially the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, have shown that the internal market (also referred to as the Single Market and its supply chains, businesses, workers and consumers can be severely affected by such crises, and appropriate crisis management tools and coordination mechanisms are either lacking, do not cover all aspects of the Single market or do not allow for a timely response to such impacts.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Actions by the Commission were delayed by several weeks due to the lack of any Union wide contingency planning measures and ofclarity as to which part of the national administration to contact to find rapid solutions to the impact on the Single Market being cause by the crisis. In addition it became clear that uncoordinated restrictive actions taken by the Member States would further aggravate the impacts of the crisis on the Single market. It emerged that there is a need for arrangements between the Member States and Union authorities as well as stakeholders and social partners as regards contingency planning, technical level coordination and cooperation and information exchange.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) Representative organisations of economic operators and social partners have suggested that economic operators did not have sufficient information on the crisis response measures of the Member States during the pandemics, partly due to not knowing where to obtain such information, partly due to language constraints and the administrative burden implied in making repeated inquiries in all the Member States, especially in a constantly changing regulatory environment. This prevented them from making informed business decisions as to what extent they may rely on their free movement rights or continue cross-border business operations during the crisis. It is necessary to improve the availability of information on national and Union level crisis response measures
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) These recent events have also highlighted the need for the Union to be better prepared for possible future crises, especially as we consider the continuaggravating effects of climate change and resulting natural disasters as well as global economic and geopolitical instabilities. Given the fact that it is not known which kind of crises could come up next and produce severe impacts on the Single Market and its supply chains in the future, it is necessary to provide for an instrument that would apply with regards to impacts on the Single Market of a wide range of crises.
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) Since any specific aspects of future crises that would impact the Single Market and its supply chains are hard to predict, this Regulation should provide for a general framework for anticipating, preventing, preparing for, mitigating and minimising the negative impacts which any crisis may cause on the Single Market and its supply chains. . while fully respecting and safeguarding fundamental human rights. by fostering its resilience. In order to do so, this Regulation should support the EU Green Deal’s objectives and the Green Deal Industrial Plan, including the transition to a full circular economy by 2050 based on short and diverse supply chains, less dependence on raw materials’ imports as well as high environmental, social and consumer protection standards while fully respecting and safeguarding fundamental human rights.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 – indent 1
Recital 9 – indent 1
— the necessary means to ensure the continued functioning of the Single Market, the businesses that operate on the Single Market and its strategic supply chains, including the free circulation of goods, services and persons in times of crisis and the availability of crisis relevant goods and services to citizens, businesses and public authorities at the time of crisis; while making sure that freedom of movement can be preserved under safe conditions especially for workers involved in the production and provision of those goods and services;
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 – indent 3
Recital 9 – indent 3
— the means for the timely accessibility and availability of the information which is needed for a targeted response and adequate market behaviour by businesses, workers and citizens during a crisis.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Where possible, this Regulation should allow for anticipation and prevention of events and crises, building on on-going analysis concerning strategically important areas of the Single Market economy and the Union’s continuous foresight work.
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) In order to account for the exceptional nature of and potential far- reaching consequences for the fundamental operation of the Single Market of a Single Market emergency, implementingvigilance and emergency, delegated powers should exceptionally be conferred ton the Councilmmission for the activation of Single Market vigilance and emergency mode pursuant to Article 281(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) Article 21 TFEU lays down the right of EU citizens to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and the measures adopted to give them effect. The detailed conditions and limitations are laid down in Directive 2004/38/EC. This Directive sets out the general principles applicable to these limitations and the grounds that may be used to justify such measures. These grounds are public policy, public security or public health. InMember States shall refrain from introducing restrictions on the free movement of Union citizens and their family members and of this rd-countext, restrictions to freedom of movement can be justified if they are proportionate and non-ry nationals legally staying or residing in the territories of the Member States as well as refugees and beneficiaries of international protection that restrict on grounds of public policy, public security and public health without individual risk assessment or that are directly discriminatory. This Regulation is not intended to provide for additional grounds for the limitation of the right to free movement of persons beyond those provided for in Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38/EC.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Article 45 TFEU lays down the right to free movement of workers, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and the measures adopted to give them effect. This Regulation contains provisions which complement the existing measures in order to preinforcserve free movement of persons, increase transparency and provide administrative assistance during Single Market emergencies while ensuring the safety of persons exercising their freedom of movement also in times of crisis. Such measures include setting up and making available of the single points of contact to workers and their representatives in the Member States and at Union level during the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes under this regulation.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) If Member States should refrain from adopting measures affecting the free movement of goods or persons, goods or the freedom to provide services in preparation for and during Single Market emergencies, they should limit such measures to what isunless justified on grounds of legitimate public policy, security and health, in a proportionate and non-discriminatory manner. Especially in Single Market emergencies, citizens, workers, consumers and businesses depend on a well functioning Single Market and on the preservation of safe freedom of movement. Therefore, any such measures restricting the free movement of goods and services have to be limited to what is absolutely necessary and have to be remove themd as soon as the situation allows it. Such measures should respect the principles of proportionality and non- discrimination and should take into consideration the particular situation of border regionsgive special regard to the particular situation of border regions, to the provision of services that are essential to the functioning of the affected sector and to sectors that are notably dependent on mobile workers especially in services of general interest. Workers who due to the nature of their tasks and responsibilities are objectively unable to work remotely should not be subject to undue restrictions as long as their safety can be guaranteed.
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The activation of the Single Market emergency mode should trigger an obligation for the Member States to notify crisis-relevant free movement restrictionsMember States shall notify any free movement restrictions without delay, and give a justified assessment of their proportionality and necessity.
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) When examining the compatibility of any notified draft or adopted measures with the principle of necessity and proportionality, the Commission should pay due regard to the evolving crisis situation and often limited information that is at the disposal of the Member States when they seek to reduce the emerging risks in the context of the crisis. Where justified and necessary in the circumstances, the Commission may consider based on any available information, including specialised or scientific information,consult with stakeholders such as social partners in order to assess the impact on the labour market. The Commission should assess the merits of Member State arguments including those relying on the precautionary principle enshrined in Article 191 TFEU as a reason for adoption of free movement of persons restrictions. It is the task of the Commission to ensure that such measures comply with Union law and do not create unjustified obstacles to the functioning of the Single Market and to the right to free movement. The Commission should react to the notifications of Member States as quickly as possible, taking into account the circumstances of the particular crisis, and at the latest within the time-limits set out by this Regulation.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure that the specific Single Market vigilance and emergency measures provided for in this Regulation are used only where this is indispensable for preparing for or responding to a particular Single Market emergency, such measures should require individual activation by means of Commission implementingand deactivation by means of delegated acts, which indicate the reasons for such activation and the crisis-relevant goods or services that such measures apply to. On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable delegated acts as referred to in Articles 9, 10, and 14, 15 and 23 in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3). In order to ensure transparency and democratic scrutiny, the European Parliament has the right to demand the Commission to annually report on the ongoing monitoring of the Single Market’s crisis preparedness, including its mapping of supply chains and the undertaken stress tests, including climate stress tests, on measures taken to increase its resilience as well as on measures taken under vigilance and emergency modes in particular vigilance and emergency situations.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Furthermore, in order to ensure the proportionality of the implementingdelegated acts and due respect for the role of economic operators in crisis management, the Commission should only resort to the activation of the Single Market emergency mode, where economic operators are not able to provide a solution on a voluntary basis within a reasonable time, this exchange should be thoroughly and clearly documented. Why this is the case should be indicated in each such act, and in relation to all particular aspects of a crisis.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) The activation of the Single Market emergency mode, where needed, should also trigger the application of certain crisis- response procedures which introduce adjustments to the rules governing the design, manufacture, conformity assessment and the placing on the market of goods subject to Union harmonised rules in full respect of the precautionary principle of Article 191 TFEU to ensure a high level of protection when it comes to human, animal, plant and environmental health. These crisis-response procedures should enable products, designated as crisis-relevant goods to be placed swiftly on the market in an emergency context. TWhen in Union harmonisation legislation, the conformity assessment is carried out by a third party, the conformity assessment bodies should prioritise the conformity assessment of crisis-relevant goods over any other ongoing applications for other products. On the other hand, in cases, where there are undue delays in the conformity assessment procedures, the national competent authorities should be able to issue authorisations for products, which have not undergone the applicable conformity assessment procedures to be placed on their respective market, provided that they comply with the applicable safety requirements. Such author, social and environmental legislations shall be only valid on the territory of the issuing Member State and laid down in relevant Union harmonisation legislation, including harmonised standards. A rolling review can ensure that the latest scientific evidence is taken into account. Such authorisations shall be only limited to the duration of the Single Market emergency and for a maximum of six months. In addition, in order to facilitate the increase in supply of crisis-relevant products, certain flexibilities should be introduced with respect to the mechanism of presumption of conformity. In order to ensure transparency about the products being placed on the market in one member state in a state of emergency under the presumption of conformity, a traceability tool shall give economic operators, market surveillance authorities and consumers the transparency and information needed about a product and its conformity. To enable regular monitoring of crisis relevant goods and goods that risk on becoming crisis- relevant, a traceabiliy tool therefore shall cover these products. In the context of a Single Market emergency, the manufacturers of crisis-relevant goods should be able to rely also on national and international standards, whichif they provide an equivalent level of protection to the harmonised European standards. In cases where the later do not exist or the compliance with them is rendered excessively difficult by the disruptions to the Single Market, the Commission should be able to issue common technical specifications of voluntary or of mandatory application in order to provide ready-to-use technical solutions to the manufacturers.
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
(29) In order to leverage the purchasing power and negotiating position of the Commission during the Single Market vigilance mode and the Single Market emergency mode, Member States should be able to request the Commission to procure on their behalf. Mandates and contracts of such joint procurement undertakings should be made available to the public.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
(30) Where there is a severe shortage of crisis-relevant products or services on the Single market during a Single Market emergency, and it is clear that the economic operators that operate on the Single market do not produce any such goods, but would in principle be able to repurpose their production lines or would have insufficient capacity to provide the goods or services needed, the Commission should be able to recommend to the Member States as a last resort to take measures to facilitate or request the ramping up or repurposing of production capacity of manufacturers or the capacity of the service providers to provide crisis- relevant services. In doing so the Commission would inform the Member States, the advisory group and the European Parliament as to the severity of the shortage and the type of the crisis- relevant goods or services that are needed and would provide support and advice in relation to the flexibilities in the EU acquis for such purposes.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
(31) The measures ensuring regulatory flexibility would allow the Commission to recommend that Member States accelerate the procedures for granting permits that would be necessary for enhancement of the capacity to produce crisis-relevant goods or provide crisis-relevant services without prejudice to the precautionary principle and fully respecting environmental, social and consumer protection standards.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Additionally, to ensure that crisis- relevant goods are available during the Single Market emergency, the Commission may invite the economic operators that operate in crisis-relevant supply chains to prioritise the orders of inputs necessary for the production of final goods that are crisis relevant, or the orders of such final goods themselves. Should an economic operator refuse to accept and prioritise such orders, following objective evidence that the availability of crisis-relevant goods is indispensable, the Commission may decide to invitshould oblige the economic operators concerned to accept and prioritise certain orders, the fulfilment of which will then take precedence over any other private or public law obligations. In the event of failure to accept, the operator in question should explain its legitimate reasons for declining the request. The Commission mayshould make such reasoned explanation or parts of it public, with due regard to business confidentiality.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) Furthermore, to ensure availability of crisis-relevant goods during the Single Market emergency, the Commission may recommend that Member States distribute strategic reserves, having with due regard to the principles of solidarity, necessity and proportionality. Intra-EU export bans shall be prohibited.
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
(35) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards the possibility to adopt supportive measures for facilitating free movement of persons and their protection, for establishing a list of individual targets (quantities and deadlines) for those strategic reserves that the Member States should maintain, so that the objectives of the initiative are achieved. Furthermore, implementingdelegated powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activating the vigilance mode and vigilance measures in order to carefully monitor the strategic supply chains and coordinate the building up of strategic reserves for goods and services of strategic importance. Moreover, implementingdelegated powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards activation of specific emergency response measures at the time of a Single Market emergency, to allow for a rapid and coordinated response. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’) and the right to liberty and security of person (Article 6). In particular, it respects the right to privacy of the economic operators enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter, right to data protection set out in Article 8 of the Charter, the freedom to conduct business and the freedom of contract, which are protected by Article 16 of the Charter, the right to property, protected by Article 17 of the Charter, right to collective bargaining and action protected by Article 26 of the Charter as well as the right to strike and the right to an effective judicial remedy and to a fair trial as provided for in Article 47 of the Charter. Since the objective of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective. The Regulation should not affect the autonomy of the social partners as recognised by the TFEU.
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
(38) The Union framework shall include interregional elements to establish coherent, multi-sectoral, cross-border Single Market vigilance and emergency response measures, in particular considering the resources, capacities and vulnerabilities across neighbouring regions, specifically border regions and cross-border workers and service providers in their local labour markets.
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) an advisory group to advise the Commission on the appropriate measures for anticipating, preparing, preventing or responding to the impact of a crisis on the Single Market;
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) contingency measures aiming at anticipation and planning, preparing, preventing and planning in order to strengthen the Single Market’s resilience;
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d
(d) measures for addressing Single and labour Market impacts of significant incidents that have not yet resulted in a Single Market emergency (Single Market vigilance), including a set of vigilance measures and
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall regularly exchange information on all matters falling within the scope of this Regulation among themselves, with the advisory group, the European Parliament and with the Commission.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. This Regulation shall not affect the fundamental rights as recognised at EU level and in Member States , including the freedom or right to strike or to take other action covered by the specific industrial relations systems in Member States.
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 5
(5) ‘goods and, services and technology of strategic importance’ means goods and, services and technology that are indispensable for ensuring the functioning of the Single Market in strategically important areas and which cannot be substituted or diversified in a timely manner;
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) ‘crisis-relevant goods and, services and technology’ means goods and, services and technology that are indispensable for responding to the crisis or for addressing the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market during a Single Market emergency ;
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall chair the advisory group and ensure its secretariat. The Commission may inviteshall ensure the presence of a representative of the European Parliament, representatives of EFTA States that are contracting parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area49 , representatives of economic operators, stakeholder organisations, social partners and experts, to attend meetings of the advisory group as observers. It shall invite the representatives of other crisis- relevant bodies at Union level as observers to the relevant meetings of the advisory group. __________________ 49 OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3.
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. For the purpose of contingency planning and strengthening the Single Market’s resilience under Articles 6 to 8, the advisory group shall assist and advise the Commission as regards the following tasks:
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) assessingment of significant incidents that the Member States have alerted the Commission to with regards to their impact on the free movement of goods, persons and services and on the labour market.
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new)
(b a) assessing measures taken by the European Commission to strengthen the Single Market’s resilience such as mapping of relevant supply chains with relevant economic operators and technology as well as stress tests, including climate stress tests, conducted by the European Commission.
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – point c
(c) consulting the representatives of economic operators, including SMEs, as well as social partners and industry to collect market intelligence;
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 7
Article 4 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall ensure the participation of all bodies at Union level that are relevant to the respective crisis. The advisory group shall cooperate and coordinate closely, where appropriate, with other relevant crisis-related bodies at Union level. The Commission shall ensure coordination with the measures implemented through other Union mechanisms, such as the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) or the EU Health Security Framework. The advisory group shall ensure information exchange with the Emergency Response Coordination Centre under the UCPM. The Commission shall annually report to the European Parliament on the work of the advisory board.
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion of the advisory group and the input of relevant Union level bodies, is empowered after consulting the Member States, to adopt a delegated act to supplement this Regulation with a framework setting out crisis protocols regarding crisis cooperation, exchange of information and crisis communication for the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes, in particular:
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) cooperation between national and Union level competent authorities for the exchange of Single Market resilience measures, the management of the Single Market vigilance and emergency modes in vigilance and emergency modes across the sectors of the Single Market;
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) a coordinated approach to risk and crisis communication also vis-à-vis the public and stakeholders with a coordinating role for the Commission;
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) consultation of the representatives of economic operators and social partnesocial partners and economic operators , including SMEs, on their initiatives and actions to mitigate andactions to respond to potentialssible supply chain disruptions and overcomresolve potential shortages of goods and services in the Single Market; including their impact on the labour markets and measures put in place to protect the safety and rights of workers and service providers in the identified strategic areas;
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall organise the training on crisis preparation, coordination, cooperation, communication and information exchange referred to in Article 6 for the staff of the designated central liaison offices. It shall organise simulations involving the staff of the central liaison offices from all Member States based on potential scenarios of Single Market emergencies.
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the number of economic operators affected by the disruption or potential disruption, including possible disruptions of the labour market;
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where the Commission, taking into consideration the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers that the threat referred to in Article 3(2) is present, it shall activate the vigilance mode for a maximum duration of six months by means of an implementing act. Such an implementing act shall contain the following: delegated act which shall be immediately applicable in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 43a.
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) an assessment of the potential impact of the crisis, laying out why this crisis is of critical importance to the Union and its Member States, pointing out why this crisis is of systemic and vital importance for public security, public safety, public order or public health, and how this crisis would have a significant impact on the functioning of the Single Market;
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The implementingdelegated act referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 412(2).
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, if it considers that the reasons for activating the vigilance mode pursuant to Article 9(1) remain valid, and taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, may extend the vigilance mode for a maximum duration of six months by means of an implementingdelegated act.
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Commission, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, finds that the threat referred to in Article 3(2) is no longer present, with respect to some or all vigilance measures or for some or all of the goods and services, it shall deactivate the vigilance mode in full or in part by means of an implementingdelegated act.
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Article 10 – paragraph 3
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Article 11 – paragraph 1
1. When the vigilance mode has been activated in accordance with Article 9, national competent authorities shall monitor the supply chains of goods and services of strategic importance that have been identified in the implementingdelegated act activating the vigilance mode.
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall set up and maintain an inventory of the most relevant economic operators established on their respective national territory that operate along the supply chains of goods and services of strategic importance that have been identified in the implementingdelegated act activating the vigilance mode.
Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. On the basis of the inventory set up pursuant to Article 6, national competent authorities shall address requests for voluntary provision of information to the most relevant operators along the supply chains of goods and services identified in the implementingdelegated act adopted pursuant to Article 9 and other relevant stakeholders established in their respective national territory. Such requests shall in particular states which information about factors impacting the availability of the identified goods and services of strategic importance isand about the impact on the labour market are requested. Each economic operator/stakeholder that voluntarily provides information shall do so on an individual basis in line with the Union rules on competition governing the exchange of information. The national competent authorities shall transmit the relevant findings to the Commission and the advisory group without undue delay via the respective central liaison office.
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission may askshall consult with the advisory group to discuss theon findings and prospects of evolution based on the monitoring of supply chains of goods and services of strategic importance.
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7
Article 11 – paragraph 7
7. On the basis of the information collected through the activities carried out in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission mayshall provide a report of the aggregated findings.
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Commission may, among the goods of strategic importance listed in an implementingdelegated act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1),, identify those for which it may be necessary to build a reserve in order to prepare for a Single Market emergency, taking into account the probability and impact of shortages on vital societal and vital economic activities. The Commission shall inform the Member States, the European Parliament and advisory board thereof.
Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission mayshall require, by means of implementing acts, that the Member States provide information on the goods listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1), as regards all of the following:
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. Taking due account of stocks held or being built up by economic operators on their territory, Member States shall deploy their best efforts to build up strategic reserves of the goods of strategic importance identified in accordance with paragraph 1. The Commission shall provide support to Member States to coordinate and streamline their efforts.
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – introductory part
4. Where the building of strategic reserves of goods of strategic importance identified pursuant to paragraph 1 can be rendered more effective by streamlining among Member States, the Commission mayshall draw up and regularly update, by means of implementing acts, a list of individual targets regarding the quantities and the deadlines for those strategic reserves that the Member States should maintain. When setting the individual targets for each Member State, the Commission shall take into account:
Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part
Following such an assessment, where the Commission establishes, supported by objective data, which is factual, measurable, substantiated and not informed by bias that
Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. When assessing the severity of a disruption for the purposes of ascertaining whether the impact of a crisis on the Single Market qualifies as a Single Market emergency, the Commission shall, based on concrete and reliable evidence, takinge into account at least the following indicators:
Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) when the freedom of movement of persons, goods and/or on services was already or is likely to be severely impacted because of the crisis;
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) an estimation of the number of economic operations or us, users or consumers relying on the disrupted sector or sectors of the Single Market for the provision of the goods or services concerned;
Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the impacts in terms of degree and duration on economic and societal activities, the environmentclimate, the environment, consumers, workers and public safety;
Amendment 608 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the importance of economic operators in the affected seconomic operator in maintaining a sufficient level of supply of the goods or services, taking into account the availability of alternative means for the provision of those goods or services; and
Amendment 618 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. Where the Commission, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers there is a Single Market emergency, it shall propose to the Council to activate the Single Market emergency mode by means of a delegated act which shall be immediately applicable in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 43a.
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The Council may activate the Single Market emergency mode by means of a Council implementing act. The duration of the activation, shall be specified in the implementingdelegated act, and shall be a maximum of six months.
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5
Article 14 – paragraph 5
5. As soon as the Single Market emergency mode is activated, the Commission shall, in consultation with the advisory group including relevant stakeholders, without delay, adopt a list of crisis-relevant goods and services and sectors that are notably depending on mobile workers by means of an implementing act. The list may be amended by means of implementing acts.
Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Where the Commission considers, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, that an extension of the Single Market emergency mode is necessary, it shall propose to the Council to extend the Single Market emergency mode by means of a delegated act which shall be immediately applicable in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 43a. Subject to urgent and exceptional changes in circumstances, the Commission shall endeavour to do so no later than 30 days before the expiry of the period for which the Single Market emergency mode has been activated. The Council may extend the Single Market emergency mode by no more than six months at a time by means of an implementing act and for a maximum duration of six months.
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Where the advisory group has concrete and reliable evidence that the Single Market emergency should be deactivated, it may formulate an opinion to that effect and transmit it to the Commission. Where the Commission, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, considers a Single Market emergency no longer exists, it shall propose to the Council without delay propose the deactivation of the Single Market emergency mode by means of a delegated act.
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Any restriction shall be limited in time and removed as soon as the situation allows it. Additionally, any restriction should take into account the situation of border regions and their cross-border and mobile workers.
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Any requirement imposed on citizens, workers and businesses shall not create an undue or unnecessary administrative burden.
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall inform citizens, consumers, businesses, workers and their representatives about measures that affect their free movement rights in a clear and unambiguous manner so as to facilitate cross-border coordination in close cooperation with social partners at national and local level.
Amendment 686 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) intraUnion export bans or other measures having equivalent effect on crisis-relevant goods or services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 5;
Amendment 689 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) restrictions on the free movement of persons involved in the production of crisis-relevant goods that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 5 and their parts or in provision of crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14 paragraph 5 or which are essential to the functioning of the relevant sectors, or other measures having equivalent effect, that:
Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Restrictions on the free movement of Union citizens and their family members and of third-country nationals legally staying or residing in the territories of Member States, as well as of refugees and beneficiaries of international protection, or other measures having equivalent effect, that: (i) restrict the freedom of movement on grounds of public policy, public security or public health without individual risk assessment or (ii) are directly discriminatory based on the nationality of the person.
Amendment 713 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point d
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) imposing prohibitions on travel, including travel for imperative family reasons, which are not appropriate for the achievement of any legitimate public interest purportedly pursued by such measures or which manifestly go beyond what is necessary to achieve that aim including established partnerships;
Amendment 716 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e
Article 17 – paragraph 4 – point e
(e) imposing restrictions on workers and service providers and their representatives, unless to do so in inherent to the nature of the crisis/Single Market emergency and it does not manifestly go beyond what is necessary for that purpose. with due regard to mobile and cross border workers, in particular those which require on-location work;
Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 6 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 6 – point a
(a) Those service providers that provide crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5), or business representatives or workers that are involved in production of crisis-relevant goods or provision of crisis-relevant services that are listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5) including those that are essential to the functioning of the affected sector to allow them to have access to the place of their activities, if activities in the sector concerned are still allowed in the Member State;
Amendment 723 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 7
Article 17 – paragraph 7
7. When taking the measures referred to in this provision, the Member States shall ensure full compliance with the Treaties and Union law, including the protection of workers, service providers and business representatives, ensuring they are able to exercise their freedom of movement under safe conditions. Nothing in this provision shall be construed as authorising or justifying restrictions to free movement contrary to the Treaties or other provisions of Union law.
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. During the Single Market emergency mode, the Commission may provide for supportive measures to reinforcfacilitate free movement of persons referred to in Article 17(6) and 17(7) and to ensure that they can exercise their freedom of movement under safe conditions by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 422(2). On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency relating to the impacts of the crisis on the Single Market, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(3).
Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall provide to the Commission a statement of the reasons which make the enactment of such measure justified and proportionate, where those reasons have not already been made clear in the notified measureaccompanied by an assessment of the necessity and proportionality of such measures. Member States shall assess in particular whether the proposed measures are likely to adequately remedy or address the Single Market emergency and whether other less restrictive measures could attain the same objective, having regard to the impact of the adopted measures on freedom of movement and other fundamental rights, their scope and duration. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the full text of the national legislative or regulatory provisions which contain or are modified by the measure.
Amendment 745 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 5
Article 19 – paragraph 5
5. If the advisory group chooses to deliver an opinion on a notified measure, it shall do so within fourtwo working days from the date of receipt by the Commission of the notification concerning that measure.
Amendment 747 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 6
Article 19 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall ensure that citizens and businesses are informed of the notified measures, unless Member States request that the measures remain confidential, or the Commission deems disclosure of those measures would affect the security and public order of the European Union or its Member States, as well as of the decisions and Member States’ comments adopted in accordance with this Article.
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 8
Article 19 – paragraph 8
8. Within 105 days from the date of receipt of the notification, the Commission shall examine the compatibility of any draft or adopted measure with Union law, including Articles 16 and 17 of this Regulation as well as the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination, and may provide comments on the notified measure when there are immediately obvious and serious grounds to believe that it does not comply with Union law. Such comments shall be taken into account by the notifying Member State. In exceptional circumstances, in particular to receive scientific advice, evidence or technical expertise in the context of an evolving situation, the period of 105 days may be extended by the Commission. The Commission shall set out the reasons justifying any such extension, shall set a new deadline and shall inform the Member States about the new deadline and the reasons for the extension without delay.
Amendment 753 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 10
Article 19 – paragraph 10
10. The notifying Member State shall communicate the measures it intends to adopt in order to comply with the comments delivered in accordance with paragraph 8 to the Commission within 105 days after receiving them.
Amendment 756 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 11
Article 19 – paragraph 11
11. If the Commission finds that the measures communicated by the notifying Member State are still not in accordance with Union law, it may issue within 3015 days of that communication, a decision requiring that Member State to refrain from adopting the notified draft measure. The notifying Member State shall communicate the adopted text of a notified draft measure to the Commission without delay.
Amendment 760 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 13
Article 19 – paragraph 13
13. The period of 3015 days referred to in paragraphs 11 and 12 may be exceptionally extended by the Commission in order to take account of a change of circumstances, in particular to receive scientific advice, evidence or technical expertise in the context of an evolving situation. The Commission shall set out the reasons justifying any such extension and shall set a new deadline and shall inform the Member States about the new deadline and the reasons for the extension without delay.
Amendment 762 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 14
Article 19 – paragraph 14
14. The Commission decisions referred to in paragraphs 11 and 12 shall be based on available information and may be issued when there are immediately obvious and serious grounds to believe that the notified measures do not comply with Union law, including Article 16 or 17 of this Regulation, the principle of proportionality or the principle of non-discrimination. The adoption of those decisions shall be without prejudice to the possibility for the Commission to adopt measures at a latIn case a Member State fails to notify the Commission or in case the Commission decides a measure taken by a Member sStage, including the launching ofte is non-compliant with EU law, the Commission shall launch an infringement procedure on the basis of Article 258 TFEU.
Amendment 769 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) assistance in dissemination of information to businesses, consumers and workers by closely cooperating with stakeholders at national and local level such as social partners and consumer organisations.
Amendment 778 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) assistance in requesting and obtaining information as regards Union level and other Member States’ crisis response measures that are relevant to the activated Single Market emergency or which affect the exercise of the free movement of goods, services, persons and workers;
Amendment 787 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. Binding measures included in this Chapter may be adopted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in accordance with Articles 24(2), first subparagraph of Article 26 and Article 27(2) may be adopted only after a Single Market Emergency has been activated by means of a Council implementingdelegated act in accordance with Article 14.
Amendment 793 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Where there is a severe crisis- related shortages or an immediate threat thereof, the Commission mayshall invite representative organisations or economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains to transmit on a voluntary basis, within a set time limit, specific information to the Commission on the production capacities and possible existing stocks of crisis- relevant goods and components thereof in Union production facilities and third country facilities which it operates, contracts or purchases supply from, as well as information on any relevant supply chain disruptions within a given deadline.
Amendment 798 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2
2. If the addressees do not transmit the information requested in accordance with paragraph 1 within the time-limit andor do not provide a valid justification for not doing so within 14 days, the Commission mayshall, by means of an implementing act, require that they transmit the information, indicating in the implementing act why it is proportionate and necessary to do so, specifying the crisis-relevant goods and services and addressees concerned by the information request, and the information that is sought, providing where necessary a template with the questions that may be addressed to the economic operators.
Amendment 808 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. Following the activation of the mandatory information requests to economic operators by means of an implementing act, the Commission shall address a formal decision to each of those representative organisations or economic operators in crisis- relevant supply chains that have been identified in the implementing act, requesting them to provide the information specified in the implementing act. The Commission shall rely, where possible, on the relevant and available contact lists of the economic operators active in the selected supply chains of crisis-relevant goods and services, compiled by the Member States and on the mapping of economic operators as referred to in Art. 6 (3new). The Commission may obtain the necessary information on the relevant economic operators from the Member States.
Amendment 813 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 5
Article 24 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission Decisions containing individual information requests shall contain a reference to the implementing act referred to in paragraph 2 on which they are based and to the situations of severe crisis-related shortages or an immediate threat thereof which has given rise to them. Any information request shall be duly justified and proportionate in terms of the volume, nature and granularity of the data, as well as the frequency of access to the data requested, and shall be necessary for the management of the emergency or for compiling relevant official statistics. A request shall set out a reasonable time limit within which the information is to be provided but which is no longer than 10 days. It shall take into account the effort required to collect and make the data available by the economic operator or representative organisation. The formal decision shall also contain safeguards for protection of data in accordance with Article 39 of this Regulation, safeguards for non-disclosure of sensitive business information contained in the reply in accordance with Article 25, and information on the possibility of contesting it before the Court of Justice of the European Union in line with relevant Union law and the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply and the timeline for a reply.
Amendment 831 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
When the Single Market emergency mode has been activated by means of a Council implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14, and there is a shortage of crisis relevant goods the Commission may activate by means of implementing acts the emergency procedures included in the Union legal frameworks amended by [Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/424, Regulation (EU) 2016/425, Regulation (EU) 2016/426, Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 and Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 and introducing emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context of a Single Market emergency and Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2013/29/EU, 2014/28/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/31/EU, 2014/32/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU, and 2014/68/EU and introducingas regard emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance in the context ofdue to a Single Market] as regards crisis-relevant goods, indicating which crisis-relevant goods and emergency procedures are subject to the activation, providing reasons for such activation and its proportionality, and indicating the duration of such activation while complying with the applicable safety requirements, social and environmental legislation laid down in relevant Union harmonisation legislation. The duration can be for maximum six months. A rolling review should ensure that the latest scientific evidence is taken into account even under emergency procedures.
Amendment 836 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a Traceability 1. For products admitted under Article 26 in this Regulation, and after consulting the Consumer Safety Network, relevant expert groups and relevant stakeholders, the Commission shall set up a system of traceability to which economic operators who place and make available those products on the market shall adhere. 2. The system of traceability shall consist of the collection and storage of data, including by electronic means, enabling the identification of the product, its components or of the economic operators involved in its supply chain, as well as in modalities to display and to access those data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents. 3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts to supplement this Regulation by: (a) determining the crisis relevant products, as referred to in paragraph 1; (b) specifying the type of data which economic operators are to collect and store by means of the system of traceability referred to in paragraph 2; (c) specifying the modalities to display and to access data, including placement of a data carrier on the product, its packaging or accompanying documents as referred to in paragraph 2; (d) specifying the actors that shall have access to the data as referred to in point (b) and to what data they shall have access, including consumers, economic operators, providers of online marketplaces, competent national authorities, the Commission, and public interest organisations, or any organisation acting on their behalf. 4. Market surveillance authorities, consumers, economic operators and other relevant actors shall have access to the data referred to in paragraph 3 based on their respective access rights set out in the applicable delegated act adopted pursuant to paragraph 3, point (d). 5. When adopting the measures referred to in paragraph 3, the Commission shall take into account: (a) an adequate timeframe to allow economic operators to prepare for those measures; and (b) the compatibility and interoperability with other product traceability systems already set up at Union or at international level.
Amendment 841 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission, informing the European Parliament, may invite one or more economic operators in crisis-relevant supply chains established in the Union to accept and prioritise certain orders for the production or supply of crisis-relevant goods (‘priority rated order’).
Amendment 846 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 2
2. If an economic operator does not accept andor prioritise priority rated orders, the Commission may, at its own initiative or at the request of 14 Member States, assess the necessity and proportionality of resorting to priority rated orders in such cases, the Commission shall give the economic operator concerned as well as any parties demonstrably affected by the potential priority rated order, the opportunity to state their position within a reasonable time limit set by the Commission in light of the circumstances of the case. In exceptional circumstances, following such an assessment, the Commission may address an implementing act to the economic operator concerned, requiring it to either accept and prioritise the priority rated orders specified in the implementing act or explain in written why it is not possible or appropriate for that operator to do so. The Commission’s decision shall be based on objective data which is factual, measurable, substantiated and not informed by bias showing that such prioritisation is indispensable to ensure the maintenance of vital societal or vital economic activities in the Single Market
Amendment 851 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 27 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Where the economic operator to which the decision referred to in paragraph 2 is addressed declines to accept the requirement to accept andperform the prioritise they rated orders specified in the decision, it shall provide to the Commission, within 10 days from the notification of the decision, a reasoned explanation setting out duly justified reasons why it is not possible or appropriate, in light of the objectives of this provision, for it to comply with the requirement. Such reasons include the inability of the operator to perform the priority rated order on account of insufficient production capacity or a serious risk that accepting the order would entail particular hardship or economic burden for the operator, or other considerations of comparable gravity.
Amendment 855 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 6
Article 27 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall take the decision referred to in paragraph 2 in accordance with applicable Union law, including the principles of necessity and proportionality, and the Union’s obligations under international law. The decision shall in particular take into account the legitimate interests of the economic operator concerned and any available information concerning the cost and effort required for any change in production sequence. It shall state the legal basis for its adoption, fix the time limits within which the priority rated order is to be performed and, where applicable, specify the product and quantity. It shall state the fines provided for in Article 28 for failure to comply with the decision. The priority rated order shall be placed at a fair and reasonable price.
Amendment 863 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission mayshall, by means of a decision, where deemed necessary and proportionate, impose fines:
Amendment 865 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) where a representative organisation of economic operators or an economic operator, intentionally or through gross negligence, supplies incorrect, incomplete or misleading information in response to a request made pursuant to Article 24, or does not supply the information within the prescribed time limit;
Amendment 866 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Amendment 871 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 3
3. Fines imposed in the cases referred to in paragraph 1 (c) shall not exceedbe lower than 1 % of the average daily turnover in the preceding business year for each working day of non-compliance with the obligation pursuant to Article 27 (priority rated orders) calculated from the date established in the decision not exceeding 1% of total turnover in the preceding business year.
Amendment 893 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Where the strategic reserves constituted by the Member States in accordance with Article 12 prove to be insufficient to meet the needs related to the Single Market emergency, the Commission, taking into consideratibuilding upon the opinion provided by the advisory group, may recommend to the Member States to distribute the strategic reserves in a targeted way, where possible, having regard to the need not to further aggravate disruptions on the Single Market, including in geographical areas particularly affected by such disruptions and in accordance with the principles of necessity, proportionality and solidarity and establishing the most efficient use of reserves with a view to ending the Single Market emergency.
Amendment 904 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) aiming at accelerating permitting of crisis-relevant goods. fully respecting social and environmental legislation;
Amendment 906 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(c a) aiming at using all flexibilities of the international framework on intellectual property protection..
Amendment 909 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 1
1. TWhen respectively the vigilance mode or Single Market emergency mode has been activated pursuant to Article 9 or 14, two or more Member States may request that the Commission launch a procurement on behalf of the Member States that wish to be represented by the Commission (ʽparticipating Member Statesʼ), for the purchasing of goods and services of strategic importance listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 9(1) or crisis-relevant goods and services listed in an implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 14(5).
Amendment 914 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall assess the utility, necessity and proportionality of the request. Where the Commission intends not to follow the request, it shall inform the Member States concerned and the advisory group referred to in Article 4 and give reasons for its refusal.
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 3
Article 34 – paragraph 3
3. Where the Commission agrees to procure on behalf of the Member States, it shall draw up a proposal for a framework agreement to be concluded with the participating Member States allowing the Commission to procure on their behalf. This agreement shall lay down the detailed conditions, practical arrangements for this procedure as well as rules for decision- making, for the procurement on behalf of the participating Member States referred to in paragraph 1 and shall be made public.
Amendment 918 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1
Article 35 – paragraph 1
1. The agreement [referred to in Article 34(3) shall establish a negotiating mandate, including on elements such as definition of technical specifications, award criteria and assessment of tenders received, for the Commission to act as a central purchasing body for relevant goods and services of strategic importance or crisis-relevant goods and services on behalf of the participating Member States through the conclusion of new contracts. which shall be made public
Amendment 926 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3
Article 35 – paragraph 3
3. Representatives of the Commission or experts nominated by the Commission may carry out on-regular on-site visits, including not anounced site visits at the locations of production facilities of relevant goods of strategic importance or crisis-relevant goods.
Amendment 929 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2
Article 36 – paragraph 2
2. The contracts mayshall include a clause stating that a Member State which has not participated in the procurement procedure may become a party to the contract after it has been signed, laying out in detail the procedure for doing so and its effects.
Amendment 930 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36 a Publication of joint public procurement contracts 1. The Commission must ensure all joint procurement contracts are made available to the public and accessible on the Commission's website within 30 days after signing of the contract. Information disclosed for public scrutiny shall include: (a) the amount of public investment paid to the contractor, broke down by cost structure of the product; (b) price per unit of the product; (c) number of product units to be delivered per quarter; (d) number and locations of the product’s manufacturing sites; (e) arrangements related to product donations, intellectual property and technology transfer within the Union and with third countries; (f) product liability clauses and compensation for any damage caused by the product; (g) terms and conditions related to the breach of the contracts and their termination. The European Court of Auditors shall have full access to all relevant documents to provide accurate annual scrutiny of signed contracts and public investment;
Amendment 942 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1
Article 40 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation shall be without prejudice to the obligations of Member States relating to their processing of personal data under Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 and Directive 2002/58/EC on privacy and electronic communications, or the obligations of the Commission and, where appropriate, other Union institutions and bodies, relating to their processing of personal data under Regulation (EU) No 2018/1725, when fulfilling their responsibilities.
Amendment 946 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3
Article 40 – paragraph 3
3. Where processing of personal data is not strictly necessary to the fulfilment of the mechanisms established in this Regulation can be achieved with processing anonymised data, personal data shall be rendered anonymous in such a manner that the data subject is not identifiable.
Amendment 949 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
Article 41 – paragraph 1
The Commission and the Member States may set up interoperable digital open source tools or IT infrastructures supporting the objectives of this Regulation. Such tools or infrastructures may be developed outside the duration of the Single Market Emergency.
Amendment 952 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 2
Article 43 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of fivetwo years from date of entry into force of this Directive or any other date set by the co- legislators.
Amendment 953 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 a (new)
Article 43 a (new)
Article 43 a Urgency procedure 1. Delegated acts adopted under this Article shall enter into force without delay and shall apply as long as no objection is expressed. 2. The notification of a delegated act to the European Parliament and to the Council shall state the reasons for the use of the urgency procedure. 3. Either the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act. In such a case, the Commission shall repeal the act immediately following the notification of the decision to object by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Amendment 958 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
Article 44 – paragraph 1
1. By [OP: please insert date = five years from the entry into force of this Regulation] and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the functioning of the contingency planning, vigilance and Single Market emergency response system suggesting any improvements if necessary, accompanied, where appropriate, by relevant legislative proposals and report on reslience measures.