7 Amendments of Angelika WINZIG related to 2021/2162(INI)
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Believes that, as a matter of principle, the same level of protection should be guaranteed for the whole EU budget, regardless if it is under direct, indirect or shared management mode;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Reminds that performance based budgeting should be a guiding principle;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Emphasises that the Financial Regulation should include provisions that require the responsible actors to gather and keep uniform records of economic operators and beneficial owners in order to allow identification across EU programmes, regardless of who implements these programmes and of management mode; considers that these requirements should be balanced to reflect strictly relevant information items; underlines that data may only be published in line with data protection requirements and the standing jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Unionemphasises the need to remove any technical and legal barriers to the collection of data on company structures and beneficial ownership and establish measures to ensure a digital and interoperable, standardised collection of information on the recipients of Union funding, including on those ultimately benefitting, directly or indirectly, from Union funding and their beneficial owners; acknowledges that the EDPS sees no general data protection issues on establishing such interoperability, but the necessity for a clear legal basis; considers that compulsory information items collected for audit and control purposes need to include as a minimum the registration number of legal entities, national identification number for natural persons, an indication of the type of beneficiary, sub-contractors, beneficial owners, whether the beneficiary also receives State aid and contact information; underlines that the system needs to facilitate the aggregation of individual amounts concerning the same direct or ultimate beneficiary; considers that publicly accessible systems should facilitate both individual searches through a web-based tool and systemic analysis through bulk downloads; urges Member States and the Commission to guarantee an increased interoperability of the existing, European and national, databases and data-mining tools;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that Article 63 of the Financial Regulation should be modified to include ARACHNE as a compulsory risk scoring tool made available by the Commission to Member States and other implementing partners; considers that the Financial Regulation should also indicate whichprovide indicators, which ARACHNE uses to determine the risk score of economic operators; stresses the need of harmonizing such basic indicators with the exclusions grounds of the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES); considers that ARACHNE should be made simpler and more user-friendly in terms of risk indicators, for example through visualisations; considers that any additional administrative burden, from inserting information multiple times in various IT systems, including ARACHNE, must be avoided;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for the use of the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) to be made compulsory under shared management; further notes that EDES does not distinguish between subsidiaries of larger corporations; calls on the Commission to make this distinction and to specify in the rules for early detection and for exclusion which entity of a multi- national or multi-company corporation is registered for early detection or exclusion; is of the opinion that the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) could help the Union institutions and national bodies to better fight and prevent corruption and fraud in the Member States; regrets that the database lists relatively few economic operators; views this as a sign that EDES is not properly implemented;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Suggests thatAsks the Commission to analyse the possibility of extending the re-use of decommitted appropriations as a result of full or partial non-implementation of projects pursuant to Article 15(3) of the Financial Regulation should be extended beyond research and innovation, to include appropriations that support social policies, you; expresses its concern about the potential breach of the and humanitarian aidnuality principle; believes that decommitted appropriations should be made available in their entirety the year following that of their decommitmentas decided by the two budgetary authorities;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Suggests that the Financial Regulation be revised to guarantee the appropriate role of Parliament in the setting up and scrutiny of any new trust fund, including in the drawing up of the constitutive agreement and the mobilisation of the Union’s contribution, the implementation, continuation and possible liquidation; reminds that the extensive use of trust funds undermines the principle of unity of the EU budget;