8 Amendments of Dragoş TUDORACHE related to 2020/2115(INI)
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas a global connectivity strategy should serve the goals of the EU’s key policies such as the European Green Deal, the Digital Transformation and the global promotion of human rights; whereas it should build on Europe’s strength in trade policy, and address newly urgent challenges such as global health and security and the rise of disinformation and fake news in the context of hybrid threats;;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that connectivity as a fundamental orientation of the European Union is deeply ingrained in the EU’s approach to domestic and international challenges; points out with pride that connectivity policies have been implemented successfully in many of the EU’s external relations; encourages the Commission and EEAS to create a Global EU Connectivity Strategy (‘the Strategy’) as an extension of the current EU-Asia connectivity strategy in order to align our connectivity philosophy and connectivity policies with the goal of strengthening the EU’s role as a true geopolitical and geo- economic actor and of strengthening partnerships with democracies around the globe who share our fundamental values;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Invites economic and societal stakeholders and relevant experts in the field at the EU level and in the Member States to participate in the development of the Strategy;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that, in order to generate sustainable growth and jobs, connectivity investments need to respect the public good, market efficiency and fiscal viability, while avoiding debt entrapment or compromises in the detriment of human rights and dignity; highlights that such investments need to support economic resilience and decarbonisation of the economy, and respect high environmental and biodiversity standards; stresses that they need to adhere to high standards of social and labour rights, transparency, human rights, due diligence, and good governance, and give a voice to the people affected by the projects;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up their ambition for the digital transformation; expects the EU to become a competitive global actor in digitalisation on a par with the US and China; considers, in this context, the promotion of digital connectivity a high priority for the EU; believes that the development of open strategic autonomy in this sector must include digitalisation partnerships with third countries who share our values and who deploy technology in full respect of fundamental rights; underlines that the EU should aim at co- leadership in setting and defending international standards and practices and to lead the way in defining such international standards in accordance with European values;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14 b. Stresses that 5G infrastructure is the backbone of the future digital society and economy and a strategic element in Europe’s strategic resilience; calls on the Commission to elaborate a plan for developing European 5G and for phasing- out of 5G technology built by third countries who do not share European values and ethical standards;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Underlines that rapid advances in Artificial Intelligence and new technologies provide non-democratic regimes with ample opportunities to use technology to restrictor infringe upon the rights of their citizens; urges the Commission to strongly condition connectivity projects with third countries on the ethical use of technology, both domestically and abroad;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Highlights the importance of trade and investment in achieving the objectives of the Strategy; emphasises, in this context, in particular the role of international norms and standards; is of the view that the EU model of standardisation policy has the advantage of being innovative, open and inclusive, and must be en abled to continue coping with the global competition between different standardisation paradigms; emphasises in this context the need to prevent any authoritarian tendencies in future standardisation of ICT and the internet of things; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to coordinate closer with likeminded democratic partners in international standard-setting fora to promote international standards that support democracy, the rule of law, and fundamental rights;