150 Amendments of Günther SIDL related to 2023/0226(COD)
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) NGTs constitute a diverse group of genomic techniques, and each of them can be used in various ways to achieve different results and products. They can result in organisms with modifications equivalent to what can be obtained by conventional breeding methods or in organisms with more complex modifications. Among NGTs, targeted mutagenesis and cisgenesis (including intragenesis) introduce genetic modifications without inserting genetic material from non-crossable species (transgenesis). They rely only on the breeders’ gene pool, i.e. the total genetic information that is available for conventional breeding including from distantly related plant species that can be crossed by advanced breeding techniques. Targeted mutagenesis techniques result in modification(s) of the DNA sequence at precise locations in the genome of an organism. Cisgenesis techniques result in the insertion, in the genome of an organism, of genetic material already present in the breeders’ gene pool. Intragenesis is a subset of cisgenesis resulting in the insertion in the genome of a rearranged copy of genetic material composed of two or more DNA sequences already present in the breeders’ gene pool.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) There is ongoing public and private research using NGTs on a wider variety of crops and traits compared to those obtained through transgenic techniques authorised in the Union or globally(33 ). This includes plants with improved tolerance or resistance to plant diseases and pests, plants with improved tolerance or resistance to climate change effects and environmental stresses, improved nutrient and water-use efficiency, plants with higher yields and resilience and improved quality characteristics. These types of new plants, coupled with the fairly easy and speedy applicability of those new techniques, could deliver benefits to farmers, consumers and to the environment. Thus, NGTs have the potential to contribute to the innovation and sustainability goals of the European Green Deal (34 ) and of the ‘Farm to Fork’ (35 ), Biodiversity (36 ) and Adaptation to Climate Change(37 ) Strategies, to global food security (38 ), the Bioeconomy Strategy (39 ) and to the Union’s strategic autonomy (40 ). _________________ 33 Insights and solutions stemming from EU-funded research and innovation projects on plant breeding strategies may contribute to address detection challenges, ensure traceability and authenticity, and promote innovation in the area of new genomic techniques. More than 1,000 projects were funded under the Seventh Framework Programme and successor Horizon 2020 programme with an investment of over 3 billion Euros. Horizon Europe support to new collaborative research projects on plant breeding strategies is also ongoing, SWD(2021) 92. 34 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, The European Green Deal, COM/2019/640 final. 35 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally friendly food system, COM/2020/381 final. 36 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives, COM/2020/380 final. 37 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions forging a Climate-Resilient Europe - The New EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change, COM(2021) 82 final 38 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Safeguarding food security and reinforcing the resilience of food systems, COM (2022) 133 final; Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), 2022, Gene editing and agrifood systems, Rome, ISBN 978-92-5- 137417-7. 39 European Commission, Directorate- General for Research and Innovation, A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe – Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment: updated bioeconomy strategy, Publications Office, 2018, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/792130 . 40 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Trade Policy Review - An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy, COM(2021)66 final.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The deliberate release into the environment of organisms obtained by NGTs, including products containing or consisting of such organisms, as well as the placing on the market of food and feed produced from these organisms, are subject to Directive 2001/18/EC and, Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 (41 ) of the European Parliament and of the Council and, in the case of food and feed, also to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (42 ), while the contained use of plant cells is subject to Directive 2009/1/EC, and transboundary movements of NGT plants to third countries are regulated by Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 (‘the Union GMO legislation’) ), in line with the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. _________________ 41 Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 24). 42 Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1).
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) In its judgment in case C-528/16 Confédération paysanne and Others43 the Court of Justice of the European Union held that GMOs obtained by means of new techniques/methods of mutagenesis that had appeared or had been mostly developed since Directive 2001/18/EC was adopted could not be considered excluded from the scope of that Directive, as the new mutagenesis techniques/methods have a comparable risk potential to the production of transgenic plants, in which foreign genetic material is introduced into the genome of organisms. In accordance with the precautionary principle, the regulations of the Genetic Engineering Law would therefore have to be applied (Art.2 No.2 of Directive 2001/18; fourth, eighth and 25th recitals). These organisms and all products derived from them must therefore be subjected to a comprehensive safety assessment for humans, animals and the environment before being placed on the market. Likewise, they must be traceable and labelled. _________________ 43 Judgement of the Court of Justice of 25 July 2018, Confédération paysanne and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’agriculture, de l’agroalimentaire et de la forêt, C-528/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:583.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The Commission’s study on new genomic techniques (45 ) concluded that the Union GMO legislation is not fit for the purpose of regulating the deliberate release of plants obtained by certain NGTs and the placing on the market of related products including food and feed. In particular, the study concluded that the authorisation procedure and risk assessment requirements for GMOs under the Union GMO legislation are not adapted to the variety of potential organisms and products that can be obtained with some NGTs, namely targeted mutagenesis and cisgenesis (including intragenesis), and these requirements can be disproportionate or inadequate. The study showed that this is particularly the case for plants obtained by these techniques, given the amount of scientific evidence that is already available, in particular on their safety. Furthermore, the Union GMO legislation is difficult to implement and enforce for plants obtained by targeted mutagenesis and cisgenesis and related products. In certain cases, genetic modifications introduced by these techniques are indistinguishable with analytical methods from natural mutations or from genetic modifications introduced by conventional breeding techniques, whereas the distinction is generally possible for genetic modifications introduced by transgenesis. The Union GMO legislation is also not conducive to developing innovative and beneficial products that could contribute to sustainability, food security and resilience of the agri-food chain. _________________ 45 Study on the status of new genomic techniques under Union law and in light of the Court of Justice ruling in Case C- 528/16, SWD(2021) 92 final.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) The legal framework for NGT plants should share the objectives of the Union GMO legislation to ensure a high level of protection of human and animal health and of the environment and the good functioning of the internal market for the concerned plants and products, while addressing the specificity of NGT plants. This legal framework should enable the development and placing on the market of plants, food and feed containing, consisting of or produced from NGT plants and o, while fully respecting ther products containing or consisting of NGT plants (‘NGT products’) so as to contribute to the innovation and sustainability objectives of the European Green Deal and the Farm to Fork, Biodiversity and Climate Adaptation strategies and to enhance the competitiveness of the Union agri-food sector at Union and world levelecautionary principle.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and the Council on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) 834/2007(47 ) prohibits the use of GMOs and products from and by GMOs in organic production. It defines GMOs for the purposes of that Regulation by reference to Directive 2001/18/EC, excluding from the prohibition GMOs which have been obtained through the techniques of genetic modification listed in Annex 1.B of Directive 2001/18/EC. As a result, category 2 NGT plants willNGT should be banned in organic production. However, it is necessary to clarify the status of category 1 NGT plants for the purposes of organic production. The use of new genomic techniques is currently incompatible with the concept of organic production in the Regulation (EC) 2018/848 and with consumers’ perception of organic products. The use of category 1 NGT plants should therefore be also prohibited in organic production. _________________ 47 Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (OJ L 150, 14.6.2018, p. 1).
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
Recital 24
(24) Provision should be made to ensure transparency as regards the use of category 1all in EU approved NGT plant varieties, to ensure that production chains that wish to remain free from NGTs can do so and thereby safeguard consumer trust. NGT plants that have obtained a category 1 NGT plant status declarationAll in the EU approved NGT plants should be listed in a publicly available database. To ensure traceability, transparency and choice for operators, during research and plant breeding, when selling seed to farmers or making plant reproductive material available to consumers and third parties in any other way, plant reproductive material of category 1 NGT plants should be labelled as category 1 NGTNGT plants should be labelled as GMO according to existing EU law, Directive 2001/18 and Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003. consumers and farmers NGT plants and products should be labelled according to existing EU law, Directive 2001/18 and Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Category 2 NGT plants should remain subject to the requirements of the Union GMO legislation given that on the basis of current scientific and technical knowledge, their risks need to be assessed. Special rules should be provided in order to adapt the procedures and certain other rules laid down in Directive 2001/18/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 to the specific nature of category 2 NGT plants and the differing levels of risk that they may pose. The precautionary principle may not be harmed, if differing risk levels will be chosen.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
(26) Category 2 NGT plants and products, in order to be released into the environment or placed on the market, should remain subject to a consent or authorisation in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. However, given the wide variety of those NGT plants, the amount of information necessary for the risk assessment will vary on a case-by-case basis. The Authority, in its scientific opinions on plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis48 and on plants developed through targeted mutagenesis49 recommended flexibility in data requirements for the risk assessment of these plants. Based on the Authority’s ‘Criteria for risk assessment of plants produced by targeted mutagenesis, cisgenesis and intragenesis’ (50 ), considerations on the history of safe use, familiarity for the environment and the function and structure of the modified/inserted sequence(s) should assist in determining the type and amount of data required to perform the risk assessment of those NGT plants. It is therefore necessary to establish general principles and criteria for the risk assessment of these plants, while providing for flexibility and possibility to adapt risk assessment methodologies to scientific and technical progress. _________________ 48 EFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms), Mullins E, Bresson J-L, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, Firbank LG, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Moreno FJ, Naegeli H, Nogué F, Sánchez Serrano JJ, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Casacuberta, J, Fernandez Dumont A, Gennaro A, Lenzi, P, Lewandowska A, Munoz Guajardo IP, Papadopoulou N and Rostoks N, 2022. Updated scientific opinion on plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis. EFSA Journal 2022;20(10):7621, 33 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7621. 49 EFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms), Naegeli H, Bresson J-L, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, Firbank LG, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Moreno FJ, Mullins E, Nogué F, Sánchez Serrano JJ, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Casacuberta J, Gennaro A, Paraskevopoulos K, Raffaello T and Rostoks N, 2020. Applicability of the EFSA Opinion on site-directed nucleases type 3 for the safety assessment of plants developed using site-directed nucleases type 1 and 2 and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. EFSA Journal 2020;18(11):6299, 14 pp. https://doi. org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6299. 50 EFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms), Mullins E, Bresson J-L, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, Firbank LG, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Moreno FJ, Naegeli H, Nogué F, Rostoks N, Sánchez Serrano JJ, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Fernandez A, Gennaro A, Papadopoulou N, Raffaello T and Schoonjans R, 2022. Statement on criteria for risk assessment of plants produced by targeted mutagenesis, cisgenesis and intragenesis. EFSA Journal 2022;20(10):7618, 12 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7618.
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Requirements on the content of notifications for consent for the placing on the market of products containing or consisting of GMOs other than food or feed and on the content of applications for authorisation for the placing on the market of genetically modified food and feed are laid down in different pieces of legislation. To ensure consistency between the notifications for consent and applications for authorisation for category 2 NGT products, the content of such notifications and applications should be the same, except those concerning the assessment of food and feed safety assessment as these are only relevant to category 2 NGT food and feed.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
Recital 30
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) To increase transparency and consumers’ information, operators should be allowed to complement the labelling of category 2 NGT products as GMO with information on the trait conferred by the genetic modification. In order to avoid misleading or confusing indications, a proposal for such a labelling should be provided in the notification for consent or in the application for authorisation and should be specified in the consent or in the authorisation decisionlabel all NGT products which comply with the requirements laid down existing EU law, Directive 2001/18 and Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003.
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
(33) Regulatory incentives should be offered to potential notifiers or applicants for category 2 NGT plants and products containing traits with the potential to contribute to a sustainable agri-food system, in order to steer the development of category 2 NGT plants towards such traits. The criteria to trigger these incentives should focus on broad trait categories with the potential to contribute to sustainability (such as those linked to tolerance or resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, improved nutritional characteristics or increased yield) and should be based on the contribution to the value for sustainable cultivation and use as defined in [Article 52(1) of the Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of plant reproductive material in the Union52 ]. The applicability of the criteria across the EU does not allow a narrower definition of traits to focus on specific issues or address local and regional specificities. _________________ 52 COM(2023) 414 final
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) In order to enable NGT plants to contribute to the sustainability objectives of the Green Deal and the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies, cultivation of NGT plants in the Union should be facilitatedregulated under existing EU law, in Directive 2001/18 and Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003. This requires predictability for breeders and farmers as regards the possibility to cultivate such plants in the Union. Therefore, the possibility for Member States to adopt measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation of category 2 NGT plants in all or part of their territory, set out in Article 26b of Directive 2001/18/EC wshould undermine those goals. remain.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
Recital 40
(40) In its judgment of 25 July 2018, in case C-528/1610 the Court of Justice of the European Union held that organisms obtained by means of techniques/methods of mutagenesis which have not conventionally been used in a number of applications and do not have a long safety record come within the scope of Directive 2001/18 and are, therefore, subject to the obligations arising from that directive. Given the novelty of the NGTs, it will be important to monitor closely the development and presence on the market of NGT plants and products and evaluate any accompanying impact on human and animal health, the environment and environmental, economic and social sustainability. Information should be collected regularly and within five years after the adoption of the first decision allowing the deliberate release or the marketing of NGT plants or NGT products in the Union, the Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Regulation to measure the progress made towards the availability of NGT plants containing such characteristics or properties on the EU market.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
Recital 45
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 46
Recital 46
(46) The Commission should regularly collect information in order to assess the performance of the legislation in achieving the development and availability of NGT plants and NGT products in the market that can contribute to the objectives of the Green Deal and the Farm to Fork, Biodiversity and Climate Adaptation strategies and in order to inform an evaluation of the legislation. A broad set of indicators have been identified56 and should be periodically reviewed by the Commission. The indicators should support monitoring of potential risks to health or the environment of category 2 NGT plants and related NGT products, impact of NGT plants on environmental, economic and social sustainability as well as impact on organic agriculture and on consumers acceptance of NGT products. A first monitoring report should be presented three years after the first products have been notified/authorised, to ensure that enough data is available after full implementation of the new legislation, and at regular intervals thereafter. The Commission should carry out an evaluation of this Regulation two years after the first monitoring report has been published, in order to allow for the impact of the first products going through the verification or authorisation to fully materialise. _________________ 56 SWD(2023) 412
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
This Regulation corresponds to the provisions of Directive 2001/18 and extends these provisions to the deliberate release of plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques (hereinafter "NGT plants"). In accordance with the precautionary principle, and with the primary objective of ensuring a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment, this Regulation lays down specific rules for the deliberate release into the environment for any other purpose than placing on the market of plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques (‘NGT plants’) and for the placing on the market of food and feed containing, consisting of or produced from such plants, and of products, other than food or feed, containing or consisting of such plants.
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) NGT plants in their use as agricultural crops;
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new)
This regulation does not apply to: (1) patented material or material for which a patent application is being processed; (2) Wild plants and trees.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) the definitions of ‘organism’, ‘deliberate release’ set out in Directive 2001/18/EC (1a), ‘deliberate release’ set out in Directive 2001/18/EC (1b) and ‘placing on the market’ set out in Directive 2001/18/EC, (1e) those of ‘food’ and ‘feed’ set out in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, (1f) that of ‘traceability’ set out in Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003, (1e) that of ‘plant’ set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council(58 ) and that of(1f) ‘plant reproductive material’ set out in [the Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of plant reproductive material in the Union59 ]; _________________ 58 Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on protective measures against pests of plants, amending Regulations (EU) No 228/2013, (EU) No 652/2014 and (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 69/464/EEC, 74/647/EEC, 93/85/EEC, 98/57/EC, 2000/29/EC, 2006/91/EC and 2007/33/EC (OJ L 317, 23.11.2016, p. 4). 59 COM(2023) 414 final
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) ‘NGT plant’ means a genetically modified plant obtained by targeted mutagenesis or cisgenesis, or a combination thereof, on the conditions that: (a) it does not contain any genetic material originating from outside the breeders’ gene pool that temporarily may have been inserted during the development of the NGT plant, (b) it is not patented and no patent application is being processed regarding that plant;
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘genetically modified organism’ or ‘GMO’ means a genetically modified organism as defined in Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC, excluding organisms obtained through the techniques of genetic modification listed in Annex I B to Directive 2001/18/EC;
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
(9) ‘NGT plant for food use’ means a NGT plant that may be used as food or as a source material for the production of food in line with the One Health approach;
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 10
(10) ‘NGT plant for feed use’ means a NGT plant that may be used as feed or as a source material for the production of feed in line with the One Health approach;
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 a (new)
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 15 b (new)
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Without prejudice to other requirements of Union law and with strict regard to the precautionary principle, an NGT plant may only be deliberately released into the environment for any other purpose other than placing on the market, and an NGT product may only be placed on the market, if: the plant has been authorised in accordance with Chapter III.
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) the plant is a category 2n NGT plant and has been authorised in accordance with Chapter III and is front-labelled as “NGT food” or “NGT feed”.
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
(2a) an extended producer responsibility (EPR) scheme has been established by an implementing act to ensure the financement of risks and possible future damages of human health, animal health or the environment or cross-contamination of organic food are financed in line with the polluter pays principle.
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
(2b) a social impact assessment has been made by the Commission to ensure the affordability of food for consumers, taking into account the short-, mid- and long-term effects of patent and monopols on the price for end consumers and the freedom of choice to consume or not consume NGT products and price difference between non-NGT products and organic food in respect of affordability and social implications.
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter II – title
Chapter II – title
II Category 1 NGT plants and category 1 NGT productsThe European Parliament deletes this chapter
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5
Article 5
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6
Article 6
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7
Article 7
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8
Article 8
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Article 9
Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10
Article 10
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 743 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter III – title
Chapter III – title
III Category 2 NGT plants and category 2 NGT products
Amendment 747 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – title
Article 12 – title
Status of Category 2 NGT plants and category 2 NGT products
Amendment 752 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter III – Section 1 – title
Chapter III – Section 1 – title
1 Deliberate release of category 2 NGT plants for any other purpose than for placing on the market
Amendment 753 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
As regards the deliberate release of a category 2n NGT plant for any other purpose than placing on the market, the notification referred to in Article 6(1) of Directive 2001/18/EC shall include:
Amendment 759 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) information relating to the category 2 NGT plant(s);
Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
(iv) information on the interactions between the category 2 NGT plant(s) and the environment;
Amendment 764 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v
(v) a plan for monitoring in order to identify effects of the category 2 NGT plant(s) on human health or the environment;
Amendment 771 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter III – Section 2 – title
Chapter III – Section 2 – title
2 Placing on the market of category 2 NGT products other than food or feed
Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. As regards the placing on the market of category 2 NGT products other than food and feed, the notification referred to in Article 13(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC, without prejudice to any additional information that may be required in accordance with Article 32b of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, shall contain:
Amendment 776 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) designation and specification of the category 2 NGT plant;
Amendment 784 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) where appropriate, a monitoring plan for environmental effects in accordance with Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC, including a proposal for the time-period of the monitoring plan; this time-period may be different from the proposed period for the consent. If, based on the results of any release notified in accordance with Section 1, the findings of the environmental risk assessment, the characteristics of the NGT plant, the characteristics and scale of its expected use and the characteristics of the receiving environment, in accordance with the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 27, point (d), the notifier considers that the NGT plant does not need a monitoring plan, the notifier may propose not to submit a monitoring plan;
Amendment 788 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point j
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) proposed commercial names of the products and names of category 2 NGT plants contained therein, and a proposal for a unique identifier for the category 2 NGT plant, developed in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 (60 ). After the consent any new commercial names should be provided to the competent authority; _________________ 60 Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms (OJ L 10, 16.1.2004, p. 5).
Amendment 795 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point l
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point l
(l) methods for sampling (including references to existing official or standardised sampling methods), detection, identification and quantification of the NGT plant. In cases where it is not feasible to provide an analytical method that detects, identifies and quantifies, if duly justified by the notifierconcluded by the Union Reference Laboratory, the modalities to comply with analytical method requirements shall be adapted as specified in the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 27, point (e) and the guidance referred to in Article 29(2);
Amendment 797 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point m
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point m
(m) samples of the category 2 NGT plant and their control samples, and information as to the place where the reference material can be accessed;
Amendment 799 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. The notifier shall include in this notification information on data or results from releases of the same category 2 NGT plant or the same combination of category 2 NGT plants previously or currently notified and/or carried out by the notifier either inside or outside the Union.
Amendment 808 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
The written consent referred to in Article 19 of Directive 2001/18/EC shall either specify monitoring requirements, as described in Article 19(3) point (f) or state that monitoring is not required. Article 17(2), point (b), of Directive 2001/18/EC shall not apply if monitoring is not required by the consentf this regulation. Seeds and other reproductive material has to be subjected to monitoring. Exemption from monitoring may be granted, if duly justified, for the release of non-reproductive material.
Amendment 812 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Amendment 817 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The consent granted under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC shall, after the firsteach renewal in accordance with Article 17 of Directive 2001/18/EC, be valid for an unlimited period, unless the decision referred to in Article 17(6) or (8) provides that the renewal is for a limited period, on justified grounds based on the findings of the risk assessment carried out pursuant to this Regulation and on experience with the use, including results of monitoring, if so specified in the consent10 years.
Amendment 825 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter III – Section 3 – title
Chapter III – Section 3 – title
3 Placing on the market of category 2 NGT plants for food or feed use and of category 2 NGT food and feed
Amendment 827 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) category 2 NGT plants for food use or for feed use;
Amendment 830 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) food containing, consisting or produced from category 2 NGT plants or containing ingredients produced from category 2 NGT plants (‘category 2 NGT food’);
Amendment 831 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) feed containing, consisting or produced from category 2 NGT plants (‘category 2 NGT feed’).
Amendment 835 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By way of derogation from Articles 5(3), point (e), and 17(3), point (e), of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, and without prejudice to any additional information that may be required in accordance with Article 32b of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, an application for authorisation of a category 2 NGT plant for food or feed use, or category 2 NGT food or feed shall be accompanied by a copy of the studies, including, where available, independent, peer-reviewed studies, which have been carried out and any other available material to demonstrate that:
Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 850 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. By way of derogation from Articles 5(5) and 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, in the case of category 2 NGT plants or food or feed containing or consisting of category 2 NGT plants, the application shall also be accompanied by:
Amendment 857 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 4
Article 19 – paragraph 4
Amendment 870 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter III – Section 4 – title
Chapter III – Section 4 – title
4 Common provisions for category 2 NGT plants and category 2 NGT products
Amendment 883 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – title
Article 22 – title
Incentives for category 2 NGT plants and category 2 NGT products containing traits relevant for sustainability
Amendment 888 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The incentives in this Article shall apply to category 2 NGT plants and category 2 NGT products, where at least one of the intended trait(s) of the NGT plant conveyed by the genetic modification is contained in Part 1 of Annex III and it does not have any traits referred to in Part 2 of that Annex.
Amendment 897 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point b
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) for potential notifications in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 2001/18/EC in conjunction with Article 14 and for potential applications under Articles 5 or 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 in conjunction with Article 19 concerning a category 2 NGT plant to be used as seeds or other plant reproductive material, the pre-submission advice shall be provided by the Authority together, or in close collaboration with the competent authority of the Member State to which the notification or application is going to be submitted;
Amendment 898 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point c
Article 22 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) the Authority shall make public without delay a summary of the pre- submission advice once an application or notification has been considered valid. Articles 38(1a) (enter regulation) shall apply mutatis mutandis;
Amendment 901 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – point a
Article 22 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) the information necessary to establish that the intended trait(s) conveyed by the genetic modification of the category 2 NGT plant meet the conditions referred to in paragraph 1;
Amendment 907 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 8
Article 22 – paragraph 8
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – title
Article 23 – title
Labelling of authorised category 2 NGT products
Amendment 918 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Amendment 924 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – title
Article 24 – title
Measures to avoid the unintended presence of category 2 NGT plants
Amendment 930 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 1
Member States shall take appropriate measures to avoid the unintended presence of category 2 NGT plants in products not subject to Directive 2001/18 or Regulation 1829/2003. This includes an obligation of NGT growers to inform organic and certified non-gm growers with field plots in a distance were outcrossing is possible to those where NGT plants are grown, according to the details specified in implementing act XXX.
Amendment 942 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25
Article 25
Article 26b of Directive 2001/18/EC shall not apply to category 2 NGT plants.5 deleted Cultivation
Amendment 944 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Amendment 956 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Article 26 – paragraph 1
Amendment 957 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Amendment 960 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Amendment 965 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Amendment 966 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 5
Article 26 – paragraph 5
Amendment 967 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 6
Article 26 – paragraph 6
Amendment 973 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 974 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 979 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 984 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) the methodology and information requirements to demonstrate that a trait can be considered to be sustainable.
Amendment 985 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
(eb) the methodology and information on how to define the inclusion of genetic information in the breeders gene pool.
Amendment 986 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
(ec) Definitions of and methodology to define risk profiles necessary for Annex II.
Amendment 987 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Article 27 – paragraph 2
Before adopting the implementing acts referred to in points (a) to (d), the Commission shall consult the Authority. Before adopting the implementing act(s) referred to in point (e), the Commission shall consult the Joint Research Centre with the European Union Reference Laboratory for Genetically Modified Food and Feed. The implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 28(3).
Amendment 991 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Amendment 996 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. No sooner than three years after the first decision is adopted in accordance with Article 6(8) or (10) or Article 7(6) or in accordance with Sections 2 or 3 of Chapter III, whichever is the earliest, and thereafter every five years, the Commission shall forward to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a report on the implementation of this Regulation.
Amendment 1000 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. The report shall also address any ethicalsocial, ethical or economic issues that have arisen with the application of this Regulation.
Amendment 1018 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1
Article 31 – paragraph 1
With regard to category 2 NGT plants, references in other Union legislation to Annex II or Annex III to Directive 2001/18/EC shall be construed as references to Parts 1 and 2 of Annex II to this Regulation.
Amendment 1020 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32
Article 32
Any decision taken under, or failure to exercise, the powers vested in the Authority by this Regulation may be reviewed by the Commission on its own initiative or in response to a request from a Member State or from any person directly and individually concerned. To this effect a request shall be submitted to the Commission within two months from the day on which the party concerned became aware of the act or omission in question. The Commission shall prepare a draft decision within two months requiring, if appropriate, the Authority to withdraw its decision or to remedy its failure to act.rticle 32 deleted Administrative review
Amendment 1034 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33
Article 33
EU 2017/625
Article 23
Article 23
Amendments to Regulation (EU) Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 is amended as follows: (1) in paragraph 2, point (a)(ii) is replaced by the following: ‘(ii) the cultivation of GMOs for food and feed production and the correct application of the plan for monitoring referred to in Article 13(2), point (e), of Directive 2001/18/EC, in Article 5(5), point (b), and Article 17(5), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Articles 14(1), point (h) and 19(3), point (b) of Regulation [reference to this Regulation];; ‘(b) the cultivation of GMOs for food and feed production and the correct application of the plan for monitoring referred to in Article 13(2), point (e), of Directive 2001/18/EC, in Article 5(5), point (b), and Article 17(5), point (b), of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and in Articles 14(1), point (h) and 19(3), point (b) of Regulation [reference to this Regulation];.rticle 33 deleted 2017/625
Amendment 1037 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 34 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
It shall apply from [248 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
Amendment 1040 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I
Annex I
Amendment 1104 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – subheading 1
Annex II – subheading 1
Risk assessment of category 2 NGT plants and category 2 NGT food and feed
Amendment 1107 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – paragraph 1
Annex II – paragraph 1
Part 1 of this Annex describes the general principles to be followed to perform the environmental risk assessment of category 2 NGT plants referred to in Article 13, points (c) and (d), Article 14(1), point (e), and Article 19(3), point (a), and the safety assessment of category 2 NGT food and feed referred to in Article 19(1), point (b). Part 2 describes specific information for the environmental risk assessment of category 2 NGT plants and Part 3 describes specific information for the safety assessment of category 2 NGT food and feed.
Amendment 1108 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 1
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 1
The environmental risk assessment shall be carried out in accordance with the precautionary principle and the principles set out in Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC.
Amendment 1111 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
The type and amount of information necessary for the environmental risk assessment of category 2 NGT plants laid down in Annex III of Directive 2001/18/EC and for the food and feed safety assessment of category 2 NGT food and feed shall be adapted to their risk profile. Factors to be considered include:
Amendment 1113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) characteristics of the recipient plant (i.a. allergenicity; potential for gene flow; weed potential; ecological function);
Amendment 1114 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new)
(ab) long safety record of the recipient plant;
Amendment 1117 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
The environmental risk assessment of category 2 NGT plants and the risk assessment of category 2 NGT food and NGT feed shall consist of the following:
Amendment 1118 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – point a
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) problem formulation including hazard identification and hazard characterisation;
Amendment 1121 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – point b
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) exposure characterisation and assessment;
Amendment 1125 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) risk management strategies
Amendment 1129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – point c b (new)
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 3 – point c b (new)
(cb) overall evaluation
Amendment 1132 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part
(a) problem formulation, hazard identification and characterisation
Amendment 1135 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point a – point i a (new)
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point a – point i a (new)
(ia) information relating to the genetic modification and their intended effects
Amendment 1136 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point a – point ii
(ii) molecular characterisation to check for intended and unintended effects. The information shall be provided by collating already available data from scientific literature or from other sources or generating scientific data where necessary by performing appropriate experimental and bioinformatic studies.
Amendment 1141 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point b – paragraph 1
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point b – paragraph 1
Information shall be provided on the likelihood of each identified potential adverse effect. Thisto cover all relevant exposure routes to humans, livestock, and the environment. Exposure shall be evaluated taking into consideration, as relevant, the characteristics of the receiving environment(s), the intended function, the dietary role, the expected level of use of the food and feed in the EU and the scope of the application for authorisation.
Amendment 1142 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point c – paragraph 1
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 4 – point c – paragraph 1
The applicant shall base its risk characterisation of NGT plants and foods and feed on information from hazard identification, hazard characterisation and exposure assessment. The risk shall for each protection goal (including specific protection goals) be characterised by combining, for each potential adverse effect, the magnitude with the likelihood of that adverse effect occurring to provide a quantitative or semi quantitative estimation of the risk. Where relevant, the uncertainty for each identified risk shall be described and the uncertainties associated with this estimate.
Amendment 1146 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 5
Annex II – Part 1 – paragraph 5
Amendment 1149 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – title
Annex II – Part 2 – title
2 Specific information for the environmental risk assessment of category 2 NGT plants concerning hazard identification and characterisation
Amendment 1150 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – point 1
Annex II – Part 2 – point 1
(1) Analysis of agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics according to Annex II of Directive 2001/18/EC
Amendment 1153 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 2 – point 8
Annex II – Part 2 – point 8
(8) Effects on human and, animal health and the food and feed chain
Amendment 1158 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 3 – title
Annex II – Part 3 – title
3 Specific information for the environmental risk assessment of category 2 NGT plantssafety assessment of NGT food and feed concerning hazard identification and characterisation
Amendment 1161 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 3 – point 1 a (new)
Annex II – Part 3 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) Analysis of potential for persistence and invasiveness resulting from transport, loss, and spillage
Amendment 1163 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Part 3 – point 2
Annex II – Part 3 – point 2
(2) Ecotoxicology and Toxicology
Amendment 1167 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – subheading 1
Annex III – subheading 1
Traits referred to in Article 3 and 22
Amendment 1174 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Annex III – Part 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) yield, including yield stability and yield under low-input conditions can justify incentives when combined with another trait or other traits under (2)-(7);
Amendment 1185 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
Annex III – Part 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7
(7) reduced need for external inputs, such as plant protection products and fertilisersfertilisers, if it does not contradict with Annex III part 2.
Amendment 1192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Part 2 – paragraph 1
Annex III – Part 2 – paragraph 1
Traits excluding the application of the incentives referred to in Article 22: tolerance to herbicides, plants producing insecticides, pesticides.